Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-24T10:12:53.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2022

Péter Mezei
Péter Mezei
Affiliation:
Szeged Law School, Hungary
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Copyright Exhaustion
Law and Policy in the United States and the European Union
 , pp. 205 - 253
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Abbott, Frederick M.: Second Report (Final) to the Committee on International Trade Law of the International Law Association on the Subject of the Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights and Parallel Importation, FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper, 2000 (http://ssrn.com/%20abstract=1921856).Google Scholar
Abbott, Frederick M.: Parallel Importation: Economic and Social Welfare Dimensions, 2007 (www.iisd.org/pdf/2007/parallel_importation.pdf).Google Scholar
Abelson, Sarah: An Emerging Secondary Market for Digital Music – The Legality of ReDigi and the Extent of the First Sale Doctrine, Entertainment and Sports Lawyer, Winter 2012, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
Acquah, Daniel: Opoku: CJEU Invokes ERTA Principle to Assert EU Competence to Ratify Marrakesh Treaty, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 7/2017, pp. 548–550.Google Scholar
Acquah, Daniel: Book Review – Peter Mezei: Copyright Exhaustion: Law and Policy of the United States and the European Union, European Review of Private Law, Vol. 3/2019, pp. 673–678.Google Scholar
Ahrens, Sönke: Die Auswirkungen des Brexits auf die Rechte des geistigen Eigentums, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 3/2020, pp. 382–392.Google Scholar
Akkermans, Bram, and Ramaekers, Eveline: Article 345 TFEU (ex. 295 EC), Its Meanings and Interpretations, European Law Journal, Vol. 3/2010, pp. 292–314.Google Scholar
Alderman, Elliott C.: Resale Royalties in the United States for Fine Visual Artists: An Alien Concept, Journal of Copyright Society, Vol. 40/1983, pp. 265–283.Google Scholar
Alderman, Liz: Along the Seine, Booksellers Try to Hold Off an Unhappy Ending, The New York Times, November 7, 2020 (www.nytimes.com/2020/11/07/world/europe/france-paris-seine-books.html).Google Scholar
Aldridge, Lindsay R.: Costco v. Omega and the First Sale Doctrine, North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 12/2011, pp. 325–344.Google Scholar
Allfeld, Philipp: Das Urheberrecht an Werken der Literatur und der Tonkunst, Zweite, vielfach veränderte Auflage, Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München, 1928.Google Scholar
Alter, Alexandra: Amazon Unveils E-Book Subscription Service, With Some Notable Absences, The New York Times, July 18, 2014 (www.nytimes.com/2014/07/19/business/media/amazon-introduces-kindle-subscription-service.html).Google Scholar
Alter, Alexandra: The World of Books Braces for a Newly Ominous Future, The New York Times, March 16, 2020 (www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/books/coronavirus-impact-publishing-industry-booksellers-authors.html).Google Scholar
Alvarado, Daniela: Seamaster-ing the First Sale Doctrine: A Tripartite Framework for Navigating the Applicability of Section 109(a) to Gray Market Goods, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 2012, pp. 885–925.Google Scholar
Amundsen, Kaitlyn E.: From Your Land to Mine: The Benefits of Applying the First Sale Doctrine to Goods Manufactured Abroad, George Mason Journal of International Commercial Law, Spring 2012, pp. 339–364.Google Scholar
Aplin, Tanya: The ECJ Elucidates the Database Right, Intellectual Property Quarterly, Vol. 2/2005, pp. 204–221.Google Scholar
Apel, Simon: Keine Anwendung der “UsedSoft”-Rechtsprechung des EuGH jenseits von Computerprogrammen – Eine Bestandaufnahme zur Erschöpfung bei “gebrauchten”digitalen Gütern, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 8–9/2015, pp. 640–648.Google Scholar
Appl, Clemens, and Schmidt, Marlene: Zweitverwertung gebrauchter Digitalgüter – Die Folgen des UsedSoft-Urteils für Schöpfungen anderer Werkarten, Medien und Recht, Vol. 4/2014, pp. 189–200.Google Scholar
Aragon, Nina: Calculating Artists’ Royalties: An Analysis of the Courts’ Dualistic Interpretations of Recording Contracts Negotiated in a Pre-Digital Age, Cardozo Law Review De Novo, 2017, pp. 180–209.Google Scholar
Arena, Amedeo: The ERTA Pre-emption Effects of Minimum and Partial Harmonisation Directives: Insights from Opinion 3/15 on the Competence to Conclude the Marrakesh Treaty, European Law Review, Vol. 5/2018, pp. 770–779.Google Scholar
Arnerstål, Stojan: Licensing Digital Content in a Sale of Goods Context, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 10/2015, pp. 750–758.Google Scholar
Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI): Report and Opinion on the Making Available and Communication to the Public in the Internet Environment – Focus on Linking Techniques on the Internet, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 149–154.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Benedict, and Fitzgerald, Brian: A Short History of Copyright – The Genie Information, Springer, Cham, 2014.Google Scholar
Außner, Nils W.: Gekaufte Binärdateien klassischer urheberrechtlicher Werke im digitalen Nachlass – Überlegungen zur Vererbbarkeit von Musik-, Film- und E-Book-Dateien, Erbrecht, Vol. 4/2021, pp. 280–289.Google Scholar
Axberg, Robyn: File-Sharing Tools and Copyright Law: A Study of In Re Aimster Copyright Litigation and MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., Loyola University Chicago Law Review, Fall 2003, pp. 389–456.Google Scholar
Bäcker, Kerstin, and Michael Höfinger, Frank: Online-Vertrieb digitaler Inhalte: Erstvertrieb, nachgelagerte Nutzungen und nachgelagerte Märkte, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 8-9/2013, pp. 623–641.Google Scholar
Bacon, Thomas J.: Caveat Bibliotheca: The First Sale Doctrine and the Future of Libraries after Omega v. Costco, John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 11/2011, pp. 414–438.Google Scholar
Bailey, Jonathan: VidAngel: It’s Not About Filtering, Plagiarism Today, January 12, 2017 (www.plagiarismtoday.com/2017/01/12/vidangel-important-case-dont-know/).Google Scholar
Bainbridge, David: Software Copyright Law, 4th ed., Butterworths, London, 1999.Google Scholar
Balderston, Michael: Global Streaming Subs Saw Record Growth in Q3 2020, Finds Strategy Analytics, TV Technology, December 17, 2020 (www.tvtechnology.com/news/global-streaming-subs-saw-record-growth-in-q3-2020-finds-strategy-analytics).Google Scholar
Barbour, Adrienne Clare: Used iTunes: The Legality of ReDigi’s Model for a Second-Hand Digital Music Store, Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Fall 2012, pp. 165–198.Google Scholar
Barfield, Claude E., and Groombridge, Mark A: The Economic Case for Copyright Owner Control over Parallel Imports, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 6/1998, pp. 904–939.Google Scholar
Barker, Emily: The California Resale Royalty Act: Droit de [Not So] Suite, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 2/2011, pp. 387–406.Google Scholar
Barnes, Brooks, and Sperling, Nicole: Studio’s Movies in Theaters Will Be Offered for In-Home Rental, The New York Times, March 16, 2020 (www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/business/media/coronavirus-universal-home-movies.html).Google Scholar
Barrett, Jonathan: An Analysis of Jean-François Millet’s The Angelus and the Origins of Droit de Suite through the Multifocal Lens of Love, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 8/2018, pp. 660–668.Google Scholar
Batchelor, Bill, and Montani, Luca: Exhaustion, Essential Subject Matter and Other CJEU Judicial Tools to Update Copyright for an Online Economy, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 8/2015, pp. 591–600.Google Scholar
Beck, Gunnar: Judicial Activism in the Court of Justice of the EU, University of Queensland Law Journal, Vol. 2/2017, pp. 333–353.Google Scholar
Beier, Friedrich-Karl: Territoriality of Trademark Law and International Trade, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 1, Vol. 1/1970, pp. 48–72.Google Scholar
Benabou, Valerie Laure: Digital Exhaustion of Copyright in the EU or Shall We Cease Being So Schizophrenic? In: Stamatoudi, Irini (Ed.): New Developments in EU and International Copyright Law, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2016, pp. 351–378.Google Scholar
Bently, Lionel, and Sherman, Brad: Intellectual Property Law, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 2009.Google Scholar
Berger, Christian: Urheberrechtliche Erschöpfungslehre und digitale Informationstechnologie, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 3/2002, pp. 198–203.Google Scholar
Berger, Christian: Verkehrsfähigkeit “Digitaler Güter”: Zur Dogmatik der Verkehrsfähigkeit von Rechten, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 170–194.Google Scholar
Bice, Scott H.: The Limited Grant of Certiorari and the Justification of Judicial Review, Wisconsin Law Review, 1975, pp. 343–413.Google Scholar
Biehler, Manuel, and Apel, Simon: Anmerking zu OLG Hamm, Urteil vom 15. Mai 2014 – I-22 U 60/13 – Keine Erschöpfung des Verbreitungsrechts bei per Download vertriebenen Hörbüchern, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 8–9/2014, pp. 727–729.Google Scholar
Billah, Muhammad Masum: Resale of Digital Works Under Copyright Laws: A Legal and Economic Analysis, John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, 2018, pp. 123–143.Google Scholar
Bjelke, Harald: The Development of Nordic Copyright in the Light of Court Usage, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 1/1991, pp. 33–55.Google Scholar
Blomqvist, Jørgen: Primer on International Copyright and Related Rights, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2014.Google Scholar
Bodewig, Theo: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights in the European Union. In: Takenaka, Toshiko (Ed.): Intellectual Property in Civil Law and Common Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013, pp. 401–415.Google Scholar
Bodewits, Joke: The Reselling of Second Hand E-Books Allowed in the Netherlands, E-Commerce Law Reports, Vol. 4/2014, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
Bodó, Balázs, Gervais, Daniel, and Quintais, João Pedro: Blockchain and Smart Contracts: the Missing Link in Copyright Licensing?, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 4/2018, pp. 311–336.Google Scholar
Bolch, Ben W., Damon, William W, and Hinshaw, C. Elton: An Economic Analysis of the California Art Royalty Statute, Connecticut Law Review, 1978, pp. 689–701.Google Scholar
Bonadio, Enrico: Parallel Imports in a Global Market: Should a Generalised International Exhaustion be the Next Step?, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2011, pp. 153–161.Google Scholar
Borghi, Maurizio: Exceptions as Users’ Rights in EU Copyright Law. In: Rosati, Eleonora (Ed.): The Routledge Handbook of EU Copyright Law, Routledge, 2021, pp. 263–280.Google Scholar
Borghi, Maurizio, Maggiolino, Mariateresa, Montagnani, Maria Lillá, and Nuccio, Massimiliano: Determinants in the Online Distribution of Digital Content: An Exploratory Analysis, European Journal for Law and Technology, Vol. 2/2012, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Bouchè, Gionata: BGH: Uploading a Free-Trial Version of Microsoft Office Is Also Making Available to the Public, Kluwer Copyright Blog, February 20, 2020 (http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2020/02/20/bgh-uploading-a-free-trial-version-of-microsoft-office-is-also-making-available-to-the-public/).Google Scholar
Boutsikaris, Constance: Can I Sell My iTunes Library? The Implications of Expanding the First Sale Doctrine to Digital Goods, Landslide, November/December 2015, pp. 26–29.Google Scholar
Bracha, Oren: United States Copyright, 1672–1909. In: Alexander, Isabella and Gómez-Arostegui, H. Tomás (Eds.): Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 335–371.Google Scholar
Braun, Thorsten: Schutz geistigen Eigentums contra Berufsausübungsfreiheit am Beispiel der Tonträgervermietung, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 8–9/1998, pp. 627–630.Google Scholar
Bräutigam, Peter: Second-Hand Software in Europe – Thoughts on the Three Questions of the German Federal Court of Justice Referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union, Computer Law Review International, Vol. 1/2012, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breagelmann, Tom: Copyright Law in and under the Constitution: The Constitutional Scope and Limits to Copyright Law in the United States in Comparison with the Scope and Limits Imposed by Constitutional and European Law on Copyright Law in Germany, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 27/2009, pp. 99–144.Google Scholar
Brison, Fabienne: The Influence of the Seven First European Directives on Belgian Copyright. In: Janssens, Marie-Christine and Van Overwalle, Geertrui (Eds.): Harmonisation of European IP Law – Contributions in Honour of Frank Gotzen, Bruylant/Larcier, Brussels, 2012, pp. 31–54.Google Scholar
Brooks, Samuel: Battling Gray Markets through Copyright Law: Omega, S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 20/2010, pp. 19–33.Google Scholar
Brown, Ralph S., and Denicola, Robert C.: Copyright – Unfair Competition, and Related Topics Bearing on the Protection of Works of Authorship, 10th ed., Foundation Press, New York, 2009.Google Scholar
Brustein, Joshua: Spotify Hits 10 Million Paid Users. Now Can It Make Money?, Bloomberg Businessweek, May 21, 2014 (www.businessweek.com/%20articles/2014–05–21/why-spotify-and-the-streaming-music-industry-cantmake-money).Google Scholar
Business Insider: How Netflix Bankrupted and Destroyed Blockbuster, March 1, 2011 (www.businessinsider.com/how-netflix-bankrupted-anddestroyed-blockbuster-infographic-2011-3).Google Scholar
Bussey, Alexander: The Incompatibility of Droit de Suite with Common Law Theories of Copyright, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 3/2013, pp. 1063–1104.Google Scholar
Büscher, Mareile, and Müller, Judith: Urheberrechtliche Fragestellungen des Audio-Video-Streamings, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 6/2009, pp. 558–560.Google Scholar
Calaba, Victor F.: Quibbles’n Bits: Making a Digital First Sale Doctrine Feasible, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 9/2002, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Calboli, Irene: Trademark Exhaustion in the European Union: Community-Wide or International? The Saga Continues, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 6/2002, pp. 47–86.Google Scholar
Calboli, Irene: The United States Supreme Court’s Decision in Kirtsaeng v. Wiley & Sons: An “Inevitable” Step in Which Direction?, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 1/2014, pp. 75–91.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alec: Copyright Exceptions for the Digital Age: New Rights of Private Copying, Parody and Quotation, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 12/2014, pp. 1002–1007.Google Scholar
Capobianco, Gregory: Rethinking ReDigi: How a Characteristics-Based Test Advances the “Digital First Sale” Doctrine Debate, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 35/2013, pp. 391–424.Google Scholar
Capon, Alex: Brexit Deal Retains Artist’s Resale Right as Part of Level Playing Field, Antiques Trade Gazette, January 18, 2021 (www.antiquestradegazette.com/print-edition/2021/january/2476/news/brexit-deal-retains-artist-s-resale-right-as-part-of-level-playing-field/?).Google Scholar
Carrington, Victoria: .ca Domain Names Are Personal Property, World Intellectual Property Review, May/June 2014, p. 81.Google Scholar
Cassiers, Vincent, and Strowel, Alain: Intellectual Property Law Made by the Court of Justice of the European Union. In: Geiger, Christophe, Nard, Craig A. and Seuba, Xavier (Eds.): Intellectual Property and the Judiciary, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2018, pp. 175-206.Google Scholar
Challis, Ben: Warner Music Moves to Settle Digital Royalties Class Action, The 1709 Blog, January 9, 2014 (http://the1709blog.blogspot.hu/2014/01/warner-music-moves-to-settle-digital.html).Google Scholar
Chatterjee, I. Neel: Imperishable Intellectual Creations: The Limits of the First Sale Doctrine, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 5/1995, pp. 383–425.Google Scholar
Chiappetta, Vincent: The Desirability of Agreeing to Disagree: The WTO, TRIPS, International IPR Exhaustion and a Few Other Things, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 21/2000, pp. 333–392.Google Scholar
Chiappetta, Vincent: Patent Exhaustion: What’s It Good For?, Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 51/2011, pp. 101–161.Google Scholar
Chiappetta, Vincent: Working toward International Harmony on Intellectual Property Exhaustion (and Substantive Law). In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 125–144.Google Scholar
Chiarizio, Matthew: An American Tragedy: E-Books, Licences, and the End of Public Lending Libraries, Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 2/2013, pp. 615–644.Google Scholar
Choderker, Ivy: The First Sale Doctrine Defense as a Limit on the Right of Publicity: Allison v. Vintage Sports Plaques, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 19/1998–1999, pp. 413–444.Google Scholar
Cistaro, Mario: The Interface between the EU Copyright Law and the Fundamental Economic Freedoms of Trade and Competition in the Digital Single Market: From the FAPL Case to the Decision, UsedSoft, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 133–153.Google Scholar
Clark, Charles R.: Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Sony Corporation of America: Application of the Fair Use Doctrine under the United States Copyright Acts of 1909 and 1976, New England Law Review, Vol. 15/1979–1980, pp. 661–681.Google Scholar
Coats, William S., Rafter, Heather D., Feeman, Vickie L, and Given, John G: Blows against the Empire: Napster, Aimster, Grokster and the War against P2P File Sharing, Practising Law Institute, Vol. 765/2003, pp. 445–488.Google Scholar
Cohen, Patricia: Lobbyists Set to Fight Royalty Bill for Artists, New York Times, March 23, 2014 (www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/arts/design/auction-houses-taking-no-chances-on-american-royalties-too-act.html).Google Scholar
Cohen Jehoram, Herman: Cabletelevision, Satellites and Copyright, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 2–3/1985, pp. 188–195.Google Scholar
Cohen Jehoram, Herman: Harmonising Intellectual Property Law within the European Community, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 5/1992, pp. 622–629.Google Scholar
Cohen Jehoram, Herman: The EC Copyright Directives, Economics and Authors’ Rights, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 6/1994, pp. 821–839.Google Scholar
Cohen Jehoram, Herman: Prohibition of Parallel Imports through Intellectual Property Rights, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 5/1999, pp. 495–511.Google Scholar
Cohen Jehoram, Herman: European Copyright Law – Ever More Horizontal, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 5/2001, pp. 532–545.Google Scholar
Collins, Maureen B.: Crossing Parallel Lines: The State of the First Sale Doctrine after Costco v. Omega, Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 8/2012, pp. 26–49.Google Scholar
Congdon, Julie S.: Copyright Law – Gray Marketing – The First Sale Doctrine of Copyright Law Closes Another Avenue of Redress, Villanova Law Review, Vol. 34/1989, pp. 597–609.Google Scholar
Cook, Trevor: EU Intellectual Property Law, Oxford University Press, New York, 2010.Google Scholar
Corbet, Jan: The Law of the EEC and Intellectual Property, Journal of Law and Commerce, Vol. 13/1994, pp. 327–369.Google Scholar
Corbet, Jan: Transposition de la Directive 2001/29/CE en Belgique, Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 4/2005, pp. 5–69.Google Scholar
Corrado, Sean M.: Care for a Sample? De Minimis, Fair Use, Blockchain, and an Approach to an Affordable Music Sampling System for Independent Artists, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 1/2019, pp. 181–244.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M.: Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Oxford Commentaries on the GATT/WTO Agreements, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.Google Scholar
Correa, Carlos M., and Correa, Juan I.: Parallel Imports and the Principle of Exhaustion of Rights in Latin America. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 198–225.Google Scholar
Corsello, Kenneth R.: The Computer Software Rental Amendments Act of 1990: Another Bend in the First Sale Doctrine, Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 41/1991, pp. 177–209.Google Scholar
Costanza, Nicholas: Digital Music Garage Sale: An Analysis of Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc. and a Proposal for Legislative Reform in Copyright Enabling a Secondary Market for Digital Music, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, Winter 2015, pp. 135–161.Google Scholar
Covotta, Brian, and Sergeeff, Pamela: ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 1998, pp. 35–54.Google Scholar
Cozine, John C.: Fade to Black? The Fate of the Gray Market after L’anza Research International, Inc. v. Quality King Distributors, Inc., University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 66/1998, pp. 775–800.Google Scholar
Craig, Carys: The Changing Face of Fair Dealing in Canadian Copyright Law: A Proposal for Legislative Reform. In: Geist, Michael (Ed.): In the Public Interest – The Future of Canadian Copyright Law, Irwin Law, Toronto, 2005, pp. 437–461.Google Scholar
Craig, Carys, and Tarantino, Bob: “An Hundred Stories in Ten Days”: COVID-19 Lessons for Culture, Learning, and Copyright Law, Osgood Hall Law Journal, Fall 2020, pp. 567–604.Google Scholar
Cross, John: Case Note: Mai Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc. (9th Cir. 1993), Law, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1/1994, pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
Cross, John: Case Note: Revisiting the “Shrinkwrap License”: ProCD Inc v. Zeidenberg, Information & Communications Technology Law, Vol. 1/1997, pp. 71–75.Google Scholar
Crowne, Emir: Anything but Tired: The Doctrine of Exhaustion in Canada, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 11/2015, pp. 801–802.Google Scholar
Cuevas, Michel Olmedo: Copyright: Dutch Copyright Succumbs to Aging as Exhaustion Extends to E-Books, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 1/2015a, pp. 8–10.Google Scholar
Cuevas, Michel Olmedo: Hot News: Amsterdam Court of Appeal Gives Tom Kabinet Three Days to Shut Down, The 1709 Blog, January 20, 2015b (http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/hot-news-amsterdam-court-of-appeal.html).Google Scholar
Dannreuther, Anna: Freedom to Contract Prevails: Anyone Can Bear the Cost of the Artist’s Resale Royalty, European Law Reporter, Vol. 1/2015, pp. 2–7.Google Scholar
Davis, Nakimuli: Reselling Digital Music: Is There a Digital First Sale Doctrine?, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 29/2009, pp. 363–373.Google Scholar
Dawson, , Mark, Bruno De Witte, , and Muir, Elise (Eds.): Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013.Google Scholar
de Beer, Jeremy, and Burri, Mira: Transatlantic Copyright Comparisons: Making Available via Hyperlinks in the European Union and Canada, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 2/2014, pp. 95–105.Google Scholar
de Beer, Jeremy, and Tomkowicz, Robert: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights in Canada, Canadian Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2009, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
Degner, Andrew: Wise-ing Up about the First Sale Doctrine: A Look at the Ninth Circuit’s Approach to Vernor v. Autodesk, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 35/2012, pp. 581–606.Google Scholar
de la Durantaye, Katharina, and Kuschel, Linda: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz – Josef Kohler, UsedSoft, and Beyond, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 195–217.Google Scholar
de la Merced, Michael J.: Pandora, Faded Star of Online Music, Gets Cash Infusion from Sirius XM, The New York Times, June 9, 2017 (www.nytimes.com/2017/06/09/business/dealbook/pandora.html).Google Scholar
Del Mar, Maksymilian, and William, Twining (Eds.): Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice, Springer, Cham, 2015. Google Scholar
Derclaye, Estelle: The Legal Protection of Databases – A Comparative Analysis, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2008.Google Scholar
Desurmont, Thierry: The Author’s Right to Control the Destination of Copies Reproducing His Work, Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 4/1987, pp. 2–69.Google Scholar
Determann, Lothar: Digital Exhaustion: New Law from the Old World’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2018, pp. 177–223.Google Scholar
Determann, Lothar, and Fellmeth, Aaron Xavier: Don’t Judge a Sale by Its License: Software Transfers under the First Sale Doctrine in the United States and the European Community, University of San Francisco Law Review, Fall 2001, pp. 1–107.Google Scholar
Determann, Lothar, and Nimmer, David: Software Copyright’s Oracle from the Cloud, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Spring 2015, pp. 161–211.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Askan, and Zimmerman, Robert: Customs Seizure Proceedings in the European Union and the United States, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 4/2014, pp. 276–286.Google Scholar
Dietz, Adolf: The Possible Harmonization of Copyright Law within the European Community, ICC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 10/1979, pp. 395–411.Google Scholar
Dietz, Adolf: The Harmonization of Copyright in the European Community, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 4/1985, pp. 379–411.Google Scholar
Dobson, Monica L.: Comment: ReDigi and the Resale of Digital Media: The Courts Reject a Digital First Sale Doctrine and Sustain the Imbalance between Copyright Owners and Consumers, Akron Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 7/2015, pp. 179–211.Google Scholar
Doi, Teruo: Japan: Copyright – Whether Computer Games Are Cinematographic Works – Exhaustion of Distribution Rights, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 9/2002, pp. N147–148.Google Scholar
Donatello, Gary: Killing the Secondary Market: How the Ninth Circuit Interpreted Vernor and Aftermath to Destroy the First Sale Doctrine, Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law, Vol. 22/2012, pp. 59–92.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Darren E.: Parallel Trade and International Harmonization of the Exhaustion of Rights Doctrine, Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, Vol. 2/1997, pp. 445–515.Google Scholar
Donohue, James P.: The Use of Copyright Laws to Prevent the Importation of “Genuine Goods,” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, Spring 1986, pp. 183–204.Google Scholar
Dredge, Stuart: Spotify Financial Results Show Struggle to Make Streaming Music Profitable, The Guardian, May 11, 2015 (www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/may/11/spotify-financial-results-streaming-musicprofitable).Google Scholar
Dreier, Thomas: Online and Its Effect on the “Goods” versus “Services” Distinction, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 2/2013, pp. 137–139.Google Scholar
Dreier, Thomas, and Leistner, Matthias: Urheberrecht im Internet: die Forschungsherausforderungen, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 9/2013, pp. 887–888.Google Scholar
Dreier, Thomas, and Schulze, Gernot: Urheberrechtsgesetz, Vierte Auflage, C. H. Beck, München, 2013.Google Scholar
DuBoff, Leonard D., King, Christy A., and Murray, Michael D.: Art Law in a Nutshell, 5th ed., West Academic, St. Paul, 2017.Google Scholar
Dutfield, Graham, and Suthersanen, Uma: Pope versus Curll (1741) Revisited: Being a Fair and True Account of the Views of Certain Well-Respected Authors on Publishing, Pyracy and Propertie in the Eighteenth Century. In: Ghosh, Shubha (Ed.): Forgotten Intellectual Property Lore – Creativity, Entrepreneurship and Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, pp. 55–77.Google Scholar
Dyekjaer, Karen: Internet Sales into the EU of Fake “Replicas,” Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Vol. 7/2014, pp. 550–551.Google Scholar
Eichelberger, Jan: Das urheberrechtliche Verbreitungsrecht (§ 17 Abs. 1 UrhG) nach den Entscheidungen EuGH Peek & Cloppenburg/Cassina und BGH – Le Corbusier-Möbel II, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 4/2011, pp. 403–434.Google Scholar
Eichelberger, Jan: (Wieder-) Ausdehnung des urheberrechtlichen Verbreitungsrechts durch den EuGH?, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 12/2012, pp. 954–959.Google Scholar
Eisnach, Michael: Omega v. Costco: An Unprecedented Decision without Precedent, ABA Section of International Law, International Intellectual Property Newsletter, Spring 2011, p. 4.Google Scholar
Elio, Anthony: The Rise and Fall of Pokémon Go, Innovation & Technology Today, December 5, 2016 (https://innotechtoday.com/rise-fall-pokemongo/).Google Scholar
Elvy, Stacy-Ann: Hybrid Transactions and the Internet of Things: Goods, Services, or Software?, Washington and Lee Law Review, Winter 2017, pp. 77–172.Google Scholar
Espantaleon, Jaime: Exhaustion Light in European Television, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 1/2010, pp. 29–42.Google Scholar
Etherington, Darrell: Apple Patents a System for the Resale and Transfer of “Used” Digital Goods, Techcrunch, March 7, 2013 (http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/07/apple-patents-a-system-for-the-resale-and-transfer-of-used-digital-goods/).Google Scholar
Etienne, Stefan: Microsoft Stops Selling eBooks and Will Refund Customers for Previous Purchases, The Verge, April 2, 2019 (www.theverge.com/2019/4/2/18292177/microsoft-ebooks-refund-stops-selling-digital-books-store).Google Scholar
Evans, Mark, and Prévost, Geneviève: Copyright Licensing Not the Answer to Grey Imports, Managing Intellectual Property, September 2007, pp. 58–59.Google Scholar
Evans, Whitney: 4 Hollywood Studios Sue Utah Movie Editing Service VidAngel, Desert News, June 10, 2016 (www.deseretnews.com/article/865656008/Major-Hollywood-studios-sue-movie-editing-service-VidAngel.html).Google Scholar
Fabian, Ewa: Blockchain, Digital Music and Lex Mercatoria, US-China Law Review, Vol. 12/2017, pp. 852–863.Google Scholar
Fagundes, David: Property Rhetoric and the Public Domain, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 94/2010, pp. 652–705.Google Scholar
Fazio, Marie: Forgotten Copy of Super Mario Bros. Sets Record at Auction, New York Times, April 3, 2021 (www.nytimes.com/2021/04/03/business/super-mario-bros-nintendo-auction.html).Google Scholar
Feiler, Lukas: Birth of the First-Download Doctrine: The Application of the First-Sale Doctrine to Internet Downloads under EU and U.S. Copyright Law, Journal of Internet Law, October 2012, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
Fennelly, Nial: Rules and Exceptions: Freedom of Movement and Intellectual Property Rights in the European Union. In: Hansen, Hugh C (Ed.): International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, Vol. 5, Juris, Huntington, 2003, pp. 33-1–33-19.Google Scholar
Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: The Spring 1997 Horace S. Manges Lecture – Copyright for the Digital Era: The WIPO “Internet” Treaties, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, Spring–Summer 1997, pp. 197–223. Google Scholar
Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: The Law of Copyright and the Internet: The 1996 WIPO Treaties, Their Interpretation and Implementation, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.Google Scholar
Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: Guide to the Copyright and Related Rights Treaties Administered by WIPO and Glossary of Copyright and Related Rights Terms, Publication 891(E), World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, 2003.Google Scholar
Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: Current Issues of Exhaustion of Rights (Kirtsaeng & Quality King, ReDigi v. UsedSoft), Copyright See-Saw, January 28, 2014a (www.copyrightseesaw.net/archive/?sw_10_item=55).Google Scholar
Ficsor, Dr. Mihály: Svensson: Honest Attempt at Establishing Due Balance Concerning the Use of Hyperlinks – Spoiled by the Erroneous “New Public” Theory, Copyright See-Saw Blog, May 4, 2014b (www.copyrightseesaw.net/archive/?sw_10_item=63).Google Scholar
Fiegerman, Seth: Netflix Nears 100 Million Subscribers, CNN Tech, April 17, 2017 (http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/17/technology/netflix-subscribers/).Google Scholar
50 Years of the Video Cassette Recorder, WIPO Magazine, November 2006, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
Figliomeni, Marco: The Song Remains the Same: Preserving the First Sale Doctrine for a Secondary Market of Digital Music, Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, November 2014, pp. 219–244.Google Scholar
Finck, Michèle, and Moscon, Valentina: Copyright Law on Blockchains: Between New Forms of Rights Administration and Digital Rights Management, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 1/2019, pp. 77–108.Google Scholar
Fischman Afori, Orit: Copyright Infringement without Copying – Reflections on the Théberge Case, Ottawa Law Review, Vol. 1/2007, pp. 25–61.Google Scholar
Frankel, Susy: Tangible Meets the Intangible: International Trade in Intellectual Property. In: Lai, Jessica C and Dominicé, Antoinette Maget (Eds.): Intellectual Property and Access to Im/material Goods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 204–224.Google Scholar
Frankel, Susy, and Gervais, Daniel: International Intellectual Property Rules and Parallel Imports. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 85–105.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton: Price Theory, 4th printing, Transaction, New Brunswick, 2008.Google Scholar
Frosio, Giancarlo: It’s All Linked: How Communication to the Public Affects Internet Architecture, Computer Law & Security Review, July 2020, Article 105410.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L.: Legal Fictions, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1967Google Scholar
Gadd, Ian: The Stationers’ Company in England before 1710. In: Alexander, Isabella and Gómez-Arostegui, H. Tomás (Eds.): Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 81–95.Google Scholar
García, Kristelia A.: Copyright Arbitrage, California Law Review, February 2019, pp. 199–266.Google Scholar
Gardner, Eriq: “Weird Al” Yankovic Settles $5 Million Lawsuit against Sony Music, The Hollywood Reporter, December 18, 2013 (www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/weird-al-yankovic-settles-5–666550).Google Scholar
Gaster, Jens: “Obtinere” of Data in the Eyes of the ECJ – How to Interpret the Database Directive after British Horseracing Board Ltd et al. v. William Hill Organisation Ltd, Computer und Recht: International, Vol. 3/2005, pp. 129–135.Google Scholar
Gaubiac, Yves: The Exhaustion of Rights in the Analogue and Digital Environment, Copyright Bulletin, Vol. 4/2002, pp. 2–15.Google Scholar
Gautam, S. Zubin: The Murky Waters of First Sale: Price Discrimination and Downstream Control in the Wake of Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 29/2014, pp. 717–758.Google Scholar
Geiger, Christophe: Der urheberrechtliche Interessenausgleich in der Informationsgesellschaft – Zur Rechtsnatur der Beschränkungen des Urheberrechts, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht International, Vol. 10/2004, pp. 815–821.Google Scholar
Geiger, Christophe: The Role of the Court of Justice of the European Union: Harmonizing, Creating and Sometimes Disrupting Copyright Law in the European Union. In: Stamatoudi, Irini (Ed.): New Developments in EU and International Copyright Law, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2016, pp. 435–446.Google Scholar
Geiregat, Simon: Digital Exhaustion of Copyright After CJEU Judgment in Ranks and Vasiļevičs, Computer Law & Securities Review, Vol. 4/2017, pp. 521–540.Google Scholar
Geiregat, Simon: Paris Court on digital exhaustion and videogames, The IPKat, October 2, 2019 (https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2019/10/guest-post-paris-court-on-digital.html).Google Scholar
Geiregat, Simon: Digital Exhaustion and Internal Market Law: Tom Kabinet, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 4/2021, pp. 1207–1228.Google Scholar
Geist, Rachel Ann: A “Licence to Read”: The Effect of E-books on Publishers, Libraries and the First Sale Doctrine, IDEA, Vol. 52/2012, pp. 63–100.Google Scholar
Gervais, Daniel J.: Copyright, Culture and the Cloud. In: Pager, Sean A. and Candeub, Adam (Eds.): Transnational Culture in the Internet Age, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2012, pp. 31–54.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Shubha: The Implementation of Exhaustion Policies – Lessons from National Experiences, Issue Paper 40, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Geneva, 2013.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Shubha, and Calboli, Irene: Exhausting Intellectual Property Rights – A Comparative Law and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2018.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Shubha, and Mezei, Péter: Elusive Quest for Digital Exhaustion in US and EU: The CJEU’s Tom Kabinet Ruling as Milestone or Millstone for Legal Evolution?, Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, 2020, p. 249–275.Google Scholar
Giannopoulou, Alexandra, Quintais, João Pedro, Mezei, Péter, and Bodó, Balázs: The Rise of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and the Role of Copyright Law – Part I, Kluwer Copyright Blog, April 14, 2021 (http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/04/14/the-rise-of-non-fungible-tokens-nfts-and-the-role-of-copyright-law-part-i/).Google Scholar
Gill, Lex: Law, Metaphor, and the Encrypted Machine, Osgood Hall Law Journal, 2018, pp. 440–477.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Jane C.: Four Reasons and a Paradox: The Manifest Superiority of Copyright over Sui Generic Protection of Computer Software, Columbia Law Review, December 1994, pp. 2559–2572.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Jane C.: Hyperlinking and “Making Available,” European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 147–148.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Jane C., and Treppoz, Edouard: International CopyrightLaw – U.S. and E.U. Perspectives, Text and Cases, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2015.Google Scholar
Gladwell, David: The Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 12/1986, pp. 366–370.Google Scholar
Glenn, H. Patrick: The Aims of Comparative Law. In: Smits, J. M. (Ed.): Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2006, pp. 57–65.Google Scholar
Göbel, Alexander: The Principle of Exhaustion and the Resale of Downloaded Software – The UsedSoft v. Oracle Case [UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corporation, ECJ (Grand Chamber), Judgment of 3 July 2012, C-128/11], European Law Reporter, Vol. 9/2012, pp. 226–234.Google Scholar
Goetzel, Dwayne K.: Recent Developments in Copyright Law, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Spring 1999, pp. 445–461.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Melissa: A Textbook Dilemma: Should the First Sale Doctrine Provide a Valid Defense for Foreign-Made Goods?, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 80/2012, pp. 3057–3092.Google Scholar
Goldmann, Michael, and Möller, Ralf: Anbieten und Verbreiten von Werken der angewandten Kunst nach der “Le-Corbusier-Möbel”-Entscheidung des EuGH, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 6/2009, pp. 551–558.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Paul, and Hugenholtz, P. Bernt: International Copyright – Principles, Law and Practice, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.Google Scholar
Gomber, Amit Jyoti S.: First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Era. In: Sinha, Manoj Kumar and Mahalwar, Vandana (Eds.): Copyright Law in the Digital World, Springer, Singapore, 2017, pp. 251–277.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Alexis: Why the Supreme Court Said Yes to the First Sale Doctrine in Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L’anza Research International, Inc., University of Miami Business Law Review, Vol. 8/1999, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Gotzen, Frank: Distribution and Exhaustion in the EC, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 8/1990, pp. 299–303.Google Scholar
Graber, Christoph B.: Tethered Technologies, Cloud Strategies and the Future of the First Sale/Exhaustion Defence in Copyright Law, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 4/2015, pp. 389–408.Google Scholar
Graham, Lorie M., and Stephen M., McJohn: Intellectual Property’s First Sale Doctrine and the Policy Against Restraints on Alienation, Texas A&M Law Review, Spring 2020, pp. 497–541.Google Scholar
Granmar, Claes: Intellectual Property Rights and the Single Market, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 4/2011, pp. 321–351.Google Scholar
Gratz, Joseph: Digital Book Distribution – The End of the First-Sale Doctrine?, Landslide, May/June 2011, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Jonathan: Exhaustion and the Alteration of Copyright Works in EU Copyright Law – (C-419/13) Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright, ERA Forum, Vol. 17/2016, pp. 73–84.Google Scholar
Grigoriadis, Lazaros G.: The Distribution of Software in the European Union after the Decision of the CJEU “UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp.” (“UsedSoft”), Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, Vol. 3/2013, pp. 198–205.Google Scholar
Grimmelmann, James: Grimmelmann: Issues in Kirtsaeng “Significant,” Publishers Weekly, March 20, 2013 (www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/copyright/article/56444-grimmelmann-issues-inkirtsaeng-too-signifcant-to-end-with-supreme-court.html).Google Scholar
Grisse, Karina, and Koroch, Stefan: The British Private Copying Exception and Its Compatibility with the Information Society Directive, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 7/2015, pp. 562–569.Google Scholar
Groffe-Charrier, Julie: Diversity of Works in Video Games – Some Thoughts on the Difficulties Inherent in Placing Rights on a Secure Footing, Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 1/2021, pp. 47–81.Google Scholar
Grützmacher, Malte: “Gebrauchtssoftware” und Erschöpfungsgrundlehre: zu den Rahmenbedingungen eines Second-Hand-Marktes für Software, Zeitschrift für Urheberund Medienrecht, Vol. 4/2006, pp. 302–306.Google Scholar
Grützmacher, Malte: Endlich angekommen im digitalen Zeitalter!? Die Erschöpfungslehre im europäischen Urheberrecht: der gemeinsame Binnenmarkt und der Handel mit gebrauchter Software, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 1/2013, pp. 46–83.Google Scholar
Grützmacher, Malte: Digitale Brüche im Urheberrecht – und ihre Auswirkungen insbesondere bei softwarebasierten hybriden Werken, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 4/2017, pp. 438–439.Google Scholar
Guadamuz, Andres: All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace: A Critical Look at Smart Contracts, Computer Law & Security Review, Vol. 6/2019, No. 105338, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Guadamuz, Andres: Can copyright teach us anything about NFTs?, TechnoLlama, March 7, 2021 (www.technollama.co.uk/can-copyright-teach-us-anything-about-nfts).Google Scholar
Guibault, Lucie, and van’t Klooster, Kevin: Netherlands. In: Hilty, Reto M. and Nérisson, Sylvie (Eds.): Balancing Copyright – A Survey of National Approaches, Max Planck Institute Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law 18, Springer, München, 2012, pp. 677–718.Google Scholar
Günther, Petteri: The Principle of Exhaustion and the Resale of Digital Music in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of the UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp. and Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi, Inc. Cases, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 205–229.Google Scholar
Haberstumpf, Helmut: Der Handel mit gebrauchter Software im harmonisierten Urheberrecht – Warum der Ansatz des EuGH einen falschen Weg zeigt, Computer und Recht, Vol. 9/2012, pp. 561–572.Google Scholar
Haberstumpf, Helmut: Josef Kohler und die Erschöpfungslehre, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 4/2014, pp. 470–496.Google Scholar
Halpern, Marcelo, Kapgan, Yury, and Yu, Kathy: Vernor v. Autodesk: Software and the First Sale Doctrine under Copyright Law, Intellectual Property and Technology Law Journal, Vol. 23/2011, pp. 7–10.Google Scholar
Hamborg, Benjamin: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng: The Uncertain Future of the First-Sale Doctrine, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology, Vol. 13/2012, pp. 899–924.Google Scholar
Hamilton, David: It’s My Copy and I’ll Sell It If I Want to: Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc., Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 2015, pp. 232–255.Google Scholar
Handley, Lucy: Streaming Services Like Disney+ Aren’t Likely to Make Money “Anytime Soon,” Analyst Says, CNBC, December 9, 2019 (www.cnbc.com/2019/12/09/streaming-services-arent-likely-to-make-money-anytime-soon.html).Google Scholar
Hansen, William R., and Suzanne, M. Morales, M: John Wiles & Sons Case: Limits on the First Sale Doctrine on U.S. Copyright Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 8/2012, pp. 558–563.Google Scholar
Hanuz, Bianca: Liability Implications of Extending the Communication to the Public Right to Third-party Re-posting of Images Already Freely Available Online with Right Holder Permission, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2019, pp. 190–196.Google Scholar
Harkai, István: Mezei, Péter: Copyright Exhaustion – Law and Policy in the United States and the European Union (Book Review), Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, 2019, pp. 577–579.Google Scholar
Harmon, Steph, and Clark, Lucy: Magda Szubanski May Leave Australia If Changes to Book Industry Go Ahead, The Guardian, May 20, 2016 (www.theguardian.com/books/2016/may/20/authors-condemn-book-copyright-and-import-proposal-as-massive-own-goal).Google Scholar
Harris, Keith: For Promotional Use Only: Is the Resale of a Promotional CD Protected by the First Sale Doctrine?, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 30/2009, pp. 1745–1772.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Thomas: Weiterverkauf und “Verleih” online vertriebener Inhalte – Zugleich Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 3. Juli 2012, Rs. C-128/11 – UsedSoft./. Oracle, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 11/2012, pp. 980–989.Google Scholar
Hartzler, Matthew H.: Shipping the Old Man across the Sea: The Importation of Books in the Public Domain Abroad, University of Illinois Law Review, 2020, pp. 1007–1043.Google Scholar
Hasik, Daniel, and Łapińska, Anna: The Seizure by Customs Authorities of Counterfeited Goods: The Ruling by the European Court of Justice in Blomqvist v. Rolex and the Changes Brought about by Regulation (EU) No. 608/2013, ERA-Forum: scripta iuris europaei, 2015 pp. 73–87.Google Scholar
Hauck, Ronny: Digitale Inhalte – Verkehrsfähigkeit oder Lizenzketten?, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 1/2017, pp. 47–71.Google Scholar
Hauck, Ronny, Hofmann, Franz, and Zech, Herbert: Verkehrsfähigkeit digitaler Güter, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 141–148.Google Scholar
Heath, Christopher: Parallel Imports and International Trade, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 5/1997, pp. 623–632.Google Scholar
Helberger, Natali, Huygen, Annelies, and van Eijk, Nico: Ups and Downs – Economic and Cultural Effects of File Sharing on Music, Film and Games, Culture and Science, Economic Affairs and Justice, Amsterdam Law School Research Paper 2012-33, Institute for Information Law Research Paper 2012-27, February 2009.Google Scholar
Helft, Miguel: Netflix to Deliver Movies to the PC, New York Times, January 16, 2007 (www.nytimes.com/2007/01/16/technology/16netflix.html).Google Scholar
Helm, Sabrina V., Ligon, Victoria, Stovall, Tony, and Van Riper, Silvia: Consumer Interpretations of Digital Ownership in the Book Market, Electronic Markets, Vol. 2/2018, pp. 177–189.Google Scholar
Hess, Evan: Code-ifying Copyright: An Architectural Solution to Digitally Expanding the First Sale Doctrine, Fordham Law Review, March 2013, pp. 1965–2011.Google Scholar
Heun-Rehn, Stefan Lars-Thoren, and Wagner, Eva: Das Folgerecht nach dem Tod des Künstlers – Erste Vorabentscheidung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs, European Law Reporter, Vol. 7/2010, pp. 212–218.Google Scholar
Hieger, Barbara: Verletzung von Marken- und Urheberrechten durch Versand rechtsverletzender Ware aus Drittstaat in die EU, Ecolex, Vol. 25/2014: p. 548.Google Scholar
Hill, Brad: Pandora Earnings: Revenue Growth, Gross Profit, Net Loss, and Savaged Stock, Radio and Internet News, October 23, 2015 (http://rainnews.com/pandora-earnings-revenue-growth-gross-profit-net-loss-and-savaged-stock/).Google Scholar
Hilty, Reto M.: “Exhaustion” in the Digital Age. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 64–82.Google Scholar
Hilty, Reto M.: Kontrolle der digitalen Werknutzung zwischen Vertrag und Erschöpfung, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 9/2018, pp. 865–880. Google Scholar
Hilty, Reto M., and Nérisson, Sylvie (Eds.): Balancing Copyright – A Survey of National Approaches, Max Planck Institute Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law 18, Springer, München, 2012.Google Scholar
Hoeren, Thomas: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz bei Software – Körperliche Übertragung und Folgeprobleme, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 8/2010a, pp. 665–673.Google Scholar
Hoeren, Thomas: Die Online-Erschöpfung im Softwarebereich – Fallgruppen und Beweislast, Multimedia und Recht, Vol. 7/2010b, pp. 447–450.Google Scholar
Hoeren, Thomas, and Försterling, Matthias: Onlinevertrieb “gebrauchter” Software – Hintergründe und Konsequenzen der EuGH-Entscheidung “Used-Soft,” Multimedia und Recht, Vol. 10/2012, pp. 642–647.Google Scholar
Hoffelder, Nate: Used eBook Website Launches in Europe, The Digital Reader, June 19, 2014a (http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/06/19/used-ebook-website-launches-europe/).Google Scholar
Hoffelder, Nate: Used eBook Website Faces Lawsuit in Europe, The Digital Reader, June 27, 2014b (http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/06/27/used-ebook-website-faces-lawsuit-europe/).Google Scholar
Hoffelder, Nate: Publishers Lose First Round of Lawsuit against Used eBook Marketplace, The Digital Reader, July 21, 2014c (http://the-digitalreader.com/2014/07/21/publishers-lose-first-round-lawsuit-used-ebookmarketplace/).Google Scholar
Hofmann, Franz: Grundsatz der Technikneutralität im Urheberrecht? Zugleich Gedanken zu einem more technological approach, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 4/2016, pp. 482–512.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Franz: Recht der digitalen Güter: Keine digitale Erschöpfung bei der Weitergabe von E-Books – Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 19.12.2019 – C-263/18 – NUV u. a./Tom Kabinet Internet u. a. (ZUM 2020, 129), Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 2/2020, pp. 136–138.Google Scholar
Hohmann, Jasmin: Case Note – eBooks: Exhaustion of Distribution Rights and Communication to the Public, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 5/2020, pp. 547–550.Google Scholar
Hojnik, Janja: Technology Neutral EU Law: Digital Goods within the Traditional Goods/Services Distinction, International Journal of Law and IT, Vol. 25/2017, pp. 63–84.Google Scholar
Homar, Philipp: Unzulässigkeit der Weiterveräußerung von E-Books – Schlussfolgerungen aus EuGH C-263/18 – Tom Kabinet, Medien und Recht, Vol. 1/2020, pp. 27–35.Google Scholar
Horowith, Martin L.: Video Games, The Licensing Journal, June/July 2020, p. 27.Google Scholar
Horowitz, David H.: The Record Rental Amendment of 1984: A Case Study in the Effort to Adapt Copyright Law to New Technology, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & Arts, March 1988, pp. 31–72.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert: Post-Sale Restraints and Competitive Harm: The First Sale Doctrine in Perspective, New York University Annual Survey of American Law, Vol. 66/2011, pp. 487–547.Google Scholar
Hugenholtz, Bernt: Harmonization or Unification of EU Copyright Law. In: Axhamn, Johan (Ed.): Copyright in a Borderless Online Environment, The Institute for Legal Research, 2012, pp. 189–204.Google Scholar
Hugenholtz, Bernt: Is Harmonization a Good Thing? The Case of the Copyright Acquis. In: Pila, Justine and Ohly, Ansgar (Eds.): The Europeanization of Intellectual Property Law: Towards a European Legal Methodology, Oxford University Press, New York, 2013, pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
Hugenholtz, P. Bernt, Quaedvlieg, Antoon, and Visser, Dirk (Eds.): A Century of Dutch Copyright Law: Auteurswet 1912–2012, deLex, Amsterdam, 2012.Google Scholar
Hunnings, N. March (Ed.): Industrial Property Cases from Common Market Law Reports, Common Law Reports Ltd., London, 1973.Google Scholar
Husa, Jaakko: Methodology of Comparative Law Today: From Paradoxes to Flexibility?, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, Vol. 4/2006, pp. 1095–1117.Google Scholar
Hyland, Mark: The Football Association Premier League Ruling – the Bosman of Exclusive Broadcasting Rights?, Communications Law, Vol. 1/2012, pp. 7–13.Google Scholar
IFPI: Global Music Report – Music Consumption Exploding Worldwide, State of the Industry Overview, 2016 (www.ifpi.org/downloads/GMR2016.pdf).Google Scholar
IFPI: Global Music Report – Annual State of the Industry, 2017 (www.ifpi.org/downloads/GMR2017.pdf).Google Scholar
IFPI: Global Music Report – The Industry in 2019, 2020 (www.ifpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Global_Music_Report-the_Industry_in_2019-en.pdf).Google Scholar
Igel, Dominic: Anmerkung zu OLG Frankfurt am Main, Urteil vom 18. Dezember 2012 – 11 U 68/11, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 4/2013, pp. 300–303.Google Scholar
Ikeler, Kim: Sony v. Universal City Studios: Can the Marketplace Relationship between Creator and Consumer Be Preserved?, Denver University Law Review, Vol. 62/1985, pp. 873–897.Google Scholar
Industrial Property and Copyright before the European Court of Justice, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 4/1982, pp. 415–430.Google Scholar
Ingham, Tim: iTunes: Music, Movie, TV and e-Book Sales Drop 7%, Music Business Worldwide, January 30, 2015 (www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/itunes-music-movie-tv-e-book-sales-drop-7/).Google Scholar
Jankowski, Donald Frank, II: The End of Ownership?, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 14/2013, pp. 103–121.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Georgia: An Extended Doctrine of Implied Consent – A Digital Mediator?, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 6/2021, pp. 706–733.Google Scholar
Joliet, René: Patented Articles and the Free Movement of Goods within the EEC, Current Legal Problems, Vol. 1/1975, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar
Jolly, Ieuan, and Westmoreland, Jill: Case Comment: Can You Sell “Used” Music Purchased on iTunes – the ReDigi Decision, Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 5/2013, pp. 180–182.Google Scholar
Jotzo, Florian: Der EuGH als Interimsnormgeber im digitalen Urheberrecht, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 4/2017, pp. 447–470.Google Scholar
Joyce, Craig P., and Patterson, L. Ray: Copyright in 1791: An Essay Concerning the Founders’ View of the Copyright Power Granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution, Emory Law Journal, Vol. 52/2003, pp. 909–952.Google Scholar
Joyce, Craig P., Leaffer, Marshall, Jaszi, Peter, Ochoa, Tyler, and Carroll, Michael: Copyright Law, 9th ed., LexisNexis, New Providence, 2013.Google Scholar
Jütte, Bernd Justin: Reconstructing European Copyright Law for the Digital Single Market – Between Old Paradigms and Digital Challenges, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2017.Google Scholar
Jütte, Bernd Justin: A Plaidoyer for the Relevance of Copyright Exhaustion, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 10/2018a, pp. 838–839.Google Scholar
Jütte, Bernd Justin: Ein horizontales Konzept der Öffentlichkeit – Facetten aus dem europäischen Urheberrecht, UFITA – Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft, Vol. 2/2018b, pp. 354–374.Google Scholar
Jütte, Bernd Justin: Finding the Balance in Copyright Law: Internal and External Control through Fundamental Rights. In: Torremans, Paul (Ed.): Intellectual Property Law and Human Rights, 4th ed., Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2020, pp. 461–484.Google Scholar
Kaczanowska, Agata: DVD, Game & Video Rental in the US, IBISWorld Industry Report 53223, May 2011 (www.ibisworld.com/industry/default.aspx?indid=1370).Google Scholar
Kaiser, Ansgar: Exhaustion, Distribution and Communication to the Public – The CJEU’s Decision C-263/18 – Tom Kabinet on E-Books and Beyond, GRUR International, Vol. 5/2020, pp. 489–495.Google Scholar
Kalimo, Harri, Meyer, Trisha, and Mylly, Tuomas: Of Values and Legitimacy – Discourse Analytical Insights on the Copyright Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Modern Law Review, Vol. 2/2018, pp. 282–307.Google Scholar
Kaltner, Jonathan: Zum EuGH-Urteil “Phil Collins,” Ecolex, Vol. 5/1994, pp. 33–34.Google Scholar
Karapapa, Stavroula: Exhaustion of Rights on Digital Content under EU Copyright: Positive and No Perspectives. In: Aplin, Tanya (Ed.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Digital Technologies, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, pp. 483–505.Google Scholar
Karjala, Dennis S.: “Copying” and “Piracy” in the Digital Age, Washburn Law Journal, Spring 2013, pp. 245–266.Google Scholar
Karmel, Dan: Off the Wall: Abandonment and the First Sale Doctrine, Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, Spring 2012, pp. 353–378. Google Scholar
Karnell, Gunnar W. G.: Exhaustion of Copyright – Swedish Law in a European Setting, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 6/1999, pp. 654–660.Google Scholar
Kass, Sean M.: Misinterpreting the Record Rental Amendment: Brilliance Audio v. Haights Cross Communications, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 21/2007, pp. 297–319.Google Scholar
Katz, Ariel: The First Sale Doctrine and the Economics of Post-Sale Restraints, Brigham Young University Law Review, 2014, pp. 55–142.Google Scholar
Katz, Ariel, Perzanowski, Aaron, and Rub, Guy A: The Interaction of Exhaustion and the General Law: A Reply to Duffy and Hynes, Virginia Law Review Online, Vol. 102/2016, pp. 8–24.Google Scholar
Katzenberger, Paul: The Droit de Suite in Copyright Law, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 3–4/1973, pp. 361–375.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Anthony: The Vanishing: The Demise of VHS, and the Movies Disappearing Along with It, Museum Moving Image, February 26, 2009 (www.movingimagesource.us/articles/the-vanishing-20090226).Google Scholar
Kawabata, B. Makoa: Unresolved Textual Tension: Capitol Records v. ReDigi and a Digital First Sale Doctrine, UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Winter 2014, pp. 33–78.Google Scholar
Keeling, David T.: Intellectual Property Rights in EU Law, Vol. 1, Free Movement and Competition Law, Oxford EC Law Library, Oxford University Press, New York, 2003.Google Scholar
Kerber, Wolfgang: Exhaustion of Digital Goods: An Economic Perspective, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 149–169.Google Scholar
Kernochan, John M.: The Distribution Right in the United States of America: Review and Reflections, Vanderbilt Law Review, October 1989, pp. 1407–1438.Google Scholar
Khoury, May: Exhausted Yet? The First-Sale Doctrine and the Second-Hand Market for Software Licenses in the European Union, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 45–57.Google Scholar
Knopf, Howard P.: Parallel Imports & the Internet: Bits, Borders, Barriers & Exhaustion. In: Hansen, Hugh C (Ed.): International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, Vol. 6, Juris, Huntington, 2001, pp. 113-1–113-66.Google Scholar
Koehler, Philipp: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz des Urheberrechts im Online-Bereich, C. H. Beck, München, 2000.Google Scholar
Kohler, Joseph: Das Authorrecht – Eine zivilistische Abhandlung, Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena, 1880.Google Scholar
Koktvedgaard, Mogens: The Principle of Exhaustion of Rights in the Law of Intellectual Property, Especially Copyright Law, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 3/1982, pp. 355–362.Google Scholar
Kon, Stephen, and Heide, Thomas: BHB/William Hill: Europe’s Feist. Court of Appeal Confirmation Establishes Bright Lines, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 1/2006, pp. 60–66.Google Scholar
Korah, Valentine: The Limitation of Copyright and Patents by the Rules for the Free Movement of Goods in the European Common Market, Case Westerne Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 7/1982, pp. 7–45.Google Scholar
Kremen, Hillary A.: Caveat Venditor: International Application of the First Sale Doctrine, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, Vol. 23/1997, pp. 161–185.Google Scholar
Kretsinger, Marilyn J.: Droit de Suite: The Artist’s Right to a Resale Royalty, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, Summer 1993, pp. 967–978.Google Scholar
Krüger, Stefan, Biehler, Manuel, and Apel, Simon: Keine “Used Games” aus dem Netz – Unanwendbarkeit der “UsefSoft”-Entscheidung des EuGH auf Videospiele, Multimedia und Recht, Vol. 12/2013, pp. 760–765.Google Scholar
Kur, Annette: Händlerwerbung für Markenartikel aus urheberrechtlicher Sicht – Präsentationsrecht als neue Schutzschranke?, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 1/1999, pp. 24–30.Google Scholar
Kuschel, Linda: Zur urheberrechtlichen Einordnung des Weiterverkaufs digitaler Werkexemplare Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 19.12.2019 – C-263/18 – NUV u. a./Tom Kabinet Internet u. a. (ZUM 2020, 129), Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 2/2020, pp. 138–140.Google Scholar
Laddie, Hugh, Prescott, Peter, Vitoria, Mary, Speck, Adrian, and Lane, Lindsay: The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs, Vol. 2, Butterworths, London, 2000.Google Scholar
LaFrance, Mary: Global Issues in Copyright Law, West Academic, St. Paul, 2009.Google Scholar
LaFrance, Mary: Using Trademark Law to Override Copyright’s First Sale Rule for Imported Copies in the United States. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 390–407.Google Scholar
Lapatoura, Ioanna: Copyright & NFTs of Digital Artworks, IPKat, March 23, 2021 (https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2021/03/guest-post-copyright-nfts-of-digital.html).Google Scholar
Larsson, Stefan: Conceptions in the Code: How Metaphors Explain Legal Challenges in Digital Times, Oxford University Press, New York, 2017Google Scholar
Lauff, Steve: Decompilation of Collective Works: When the First Sale Doctrine Is a Mirage, Texas Law Review, 1998, pp. 869–904.Google Scholar
Lauterbach, Thorsten: Copyright Law Trumps Free Movement of Unlawfully Distributed Goods, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Vol. 1/2013, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar
Lay, Stacia N.: The First Sale Doctrine in a Digital World?, The Copyright & New Media Law Newsletter, Vol. 4/2013, pp. 3–4, 11.Google Scholar
Lavin, Sean, Klees, Tracey, Lee, Daye, Mah, Scott, Marhsall, Caroline, and Watlington, Ellen: Intellectual Property Crimes, American Criminal Law Review, Summer, 2019, pp. 1101–1149.Google Scholar
Leahy, Brandon: Supreme Indecision: Copyright’s First Sale Doctrine in the Gray Aftermath of Costco v. Omega, Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, Fall 2011, pp. 45–67.Google Scholar
Lee, Yin Harn: UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp. (Case C-128/11) – Sales of “Used” Software and the Principle of Exhaustion, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 7/2012, pp. 846–853.Google Scholar
Lee, Yin Harn: United Kingdom Copyright Decisions and Post-Brexit Copyright Developments 2020, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 3/2021, pp. 319–328.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Michael: Digitisation and Copyright Agreements. In: Stamatoudi, Irini A and Paul, L. Torremans, C (Eds.): Copyright in the New Digital Environment: The Need to Redesign Copyright, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2000, pp. 193–204.Google Scholar
Leiss, Ludwig: Verlagsgesetz – Kommentar mit Vertragmustern, De Gruyter, Berlin, 1973.Google Scholar
Leistner, Matthias: Gebrauchtsoftware auf dem Weg nach Luxemburg – Der Vorlagebeschluss des BGH in Sachen Oracle v. UsedSoft, Computer und Recht, Vol. 4/2011a, pp. 209–215.Google Scholar
Leistner, Matthias: “Used” Software before Europe’s Top Court – the German Federal Supreme Court Refers the Oracle v. UsedSoft Case to the European Court of Justice, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 5/2011b, pp. 503–506.Google Scholar
Leistner, Matthias, and Antoine, Lucie: Exhaustion and Second-Hand Digital Goods/Contents. In: Heath, Christopher, Sanders, Anselm Kamperman and Moerland, Anke (Eds.): Intellectual Property Rights as Obstacles to Legitimate Trade?, Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2018, pp. 159–180.Google Scholar
Lejeune, Mathias: Remarks to USA: No Second Hand Digital Music (Yet), Computer Law Review International, Vol. 3/2013, pp. 88–90.Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark A.: Disappearing Content (manuscript), December 29, 2020, pp. 1–36. (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3715133).Google Scholar
Leong, Terence: When the Software We Buy Is Not Actually Ours: An Analysis of Vernor v. Autodesk on the First Sale Doctrine and Essential Step Defense, Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, January 2012, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Leval, Pierre: Toward a Fair Use Standard, Harvard Law Review, 1990, pp. 1105–1136.Google Scholar
Lichfield, Gideon: We’re Not Going Back to Normal, MIT Technology Review, March 17, 2020 (www.technologyreview.com/s/615370/coronavirus-pandemic-social-distancing-18-months/).Google Scholar
Lindey, Alexander, and Landau, Michael: Lindey on Entertainment, Publishing and the Arts, 3rd ed., Thomson Reuters, 2016.Google Scholar
Linklater, Emma: UsedSoft and the Big Bang Theory: Is the e-Exhaustion Meteor about to Strike?, JIPITEC, Vol. 1/2014, pp. 12–22.Google Scholar
Lipton, Jacqueline: Rethinking Cyberlaw – A New Vision for Internet Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2015.Google Scholar
Lipton, Jacqueline: Mass Digitization in the Ebook Market: Copyright Protections and Exceptions. In: Aplin, Tanya (Ed.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Digital Technologies, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, pp. 186–200.Google Scholar
Litman, Jessica: Digital Copyright, Prometheus Books, Amherst, 2006.Google Scholar
Liu, Joseph P.: Owning Digital Copies: Copyright Law and the Incidents of Copy Ownership, William and Mary Law Review, April 2001, pp. 1245–1366.Google Scholar
Loades, D. M.: The Press under the Early Tudors: A Study in Censorship and Sedition, Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, Vol. 4/1964, pp. 29–50.Google Scholar
Lober, Andreas, Klein, Susanne, and Groothuis, Florian: The Long and Winding Road of Digital Distribution. Or: Why the ECJ’s UsedSoft Decision Is of No Use to Keysellers, Interactive Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 1/2018, pp. 44–51.Google Scholar
Loewenheim, Ulrich (Ed.): Handbuch des Urheberrechts, Vol. 2. Auflage/C. H. Beck, München, 2010.Google Scholar
Long, Doris Estelle: Globalization: A Future Trend or a Satisfying Mirage, Journal of Copyright Society, Vol. 49/2001, pp. 313–343.Google Scholar
Long, Doris Estelle: Deviant Globalization: The Next Step in the Multilateral Protection of Intellectual Property. In: Weckström, Katja (Ed.): Governing Innovation and Expression: New Regimes, Strategies and Techniques, Private Law Series A:132, University of Turku Faculty of Law, Turku, 2013, pp. 49–84.Google Scholar
Long, Henry Sprott, III: Reconsidering the “Balance” of the “Digital First Sale” Debate: Re-examining the Case for a Statutory Digital First Sale Doctrine to Facilitate Second-Hand Digital Media Markets, Alabama Law Review, Vol. 59/2008, pp. 1183–1201.Google Scholar
Longdin, Louise: Making the Most of Article 6: Parallel Importing in Australia and New Zealand. In: Hansen, Hugh C (Ed.): International Intellectual Property Law & Policy, Vol. 6, Juris, Huntington, 2001, pp. 112-1–112-38.Google Scholar
Longdin, Louise, Eagles, Ian, and Lim, Pheh Hoon: Sale versus Licence Offline and Online: Can Competition Law Bridge the Doctrinal Gap? Sale versus Licence Offline and Online, International Journal of Law and IT, Vol. 4/2014, pp. 311–333.Google Scholar
Longdin, Louise, and Lim, Pheh Hoon: Inexhaustible Distribution Rights for Copyright Owners and the Foreclosure of Secondary Markets for Used Software, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Vol. 5/2013, pp. 541–567.Google Scholar
Loughlan, Patricia: “You Wouldn’t Steal a Car”: Intellectual Property and the Language of Theft, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 29/2007, pp. 401–405.Google Scholar
Lucas, André: Copyright in the European Community: The Green Paper and the Proposal for a Directive Concerning Legal Protection of Computer Programs, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 29/1991, pp. 145–167.Google Scholar
Lunney, Glynn S., Jr.: Copyright’s Price Discrimination Panacea, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Spring 2008, pp. 387–456.Google Scholar
Maclean, Fiona: European Union (CJEU) has delivered its long-awaited decision in UsedSoft v. Oracle International Corp., Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, Vol. 1/2013, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Maggioni, Ilaria: Kirtsaeng v. Wiley Incentivizes Digital Distribution, les Nouvelles, December 2013, pp. 260–262.Google Scholar
Maher, Imelda: Trade Marks & International Exhaustion, The Bar Review, Vol. 5/2000, pp. 243–246.Google Scholar
Malovic, Nedim: Copyright: Distribution Right Encompasses Advertisement for Sale of Copyright Works, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Vol. 12/2015, pp. 895–896.Google Scholar
Marly, Jochen, and Wirz, Anna-Lena: Die Weiterverbreitung digitaler Güter, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, Vol. 1/2017, pp. 16–19.Google Scholar
Matthews, Brander: The Evolution of Copyright, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 5/1890, pp. 583–602.Google Scholar
Matulionyte, Rita: Lending E-Books in Libraries: Is a Technologically Neutral Approach the Solution?, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 4/2017, pp. 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCusker, John, and Menard, Russell R: The Economy of British America, 1607–1789, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1991.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Jeff A.: Recent Copyright Case Law Development, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 5/1997, pp. 293–317.Google Scholar
McInerney, John E., III: California Resale Royalties Act: Private Sector Enforcement, University of Sand Francisco Law Review, 1984, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Hugh: Spotify Officially Hits 50 Million Paid Subscribers, Forbes, March 3, 2017 (www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2017/03/03/spotify-officially-hits-50-million-paying-subscribers/).Google Scholar
McJohn, Steven M.: Copyright – Examples & Explanations, Aspen Publishers, New York, 2006.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Elizabeth: A Book by Any Other Name: E-Books and the First Sale Doctrine, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 12/2013, pp. 57–73.Google Scholar
Menell, Peter S.: In Search of Copyright’s Lost Ark: Interpreting the Right to Distribute in the Internet Age, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, Vol. 59/2012, pp. 201–267.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry: The Wrath of Robert Rauschenberg, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Winter 1993, pp. 103–127.Google Scholar
Meurer, Michael J.: Copyright Law and Price Discrimination, Cardozo Law Review, November 2001, pp. 55–148.Google Scholar
Mezei, Péter: The Painter, the One Horn Cow and Ole Hank Wilson’s Back Lot – The Future of Library Digitization in the European Union and Hungary, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 5/2015, pp. 535–562.Google Scholar
Mezei, Péter: Enter the Matrix: The Effects of the CJEU’s Case Law on Linking and Beyond, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 10/2016, pp. 887–900.Google Scholar
Mezei, Péter: The Doctrine of Exhaustion in Limbo – Critical Remarks on the CJEU’s Tom Kabinet Ruling, Zeszty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego - Prace z Prawa Wlasnosci Intelektualnej (Jagiellonian University Intellectual Property Law Review), Vol. 2/2020a, pp. 130–153.Google Scholar
Mezei, Péter: Acquis Communautaire+ The Copyright Aspects of the EU’s Free Trade Agreements. In: Nagy, Csongor (Ed.): World Trade and Local Public Interest – Trade Liberalization and National Regulatory Sovereignty, Springer, Cham, 2020b, pp. 51–64.Google Scholar
Mezei, Péter, and Jütte, Bernd Justin: CJEU Clarifies that Framing Infringes Copyright if TPMs are Circumvented, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 6/2021, pp. 461–463.Google Scholar
Mezei, Péter, Quintais, João Pedro, Giannapoulou, Alexandra, and Bodó, Balázs: The Rise of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and the Role of Copyright Law – Part II, Kluwer Copyright Blog, April 22, 2021 (http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/04/22/the-rise-of-non-fungible-tokens-nfts-and-the-role-of-copyright-law-part-ii/).Google Scholar
Miller, Claire Cain, and Bosman, Julie: E-Books Outsell Print Books at Amazon, The New York Times, May 19, 2011 (www.nytimes.com/2011/05/20/technology/20amazon.html).Google Scholar
Miller, Esti: NAFTA: Protector of National Intellectual Property Rights or Blueprint for Globalization? The Effect of NAFTA on the First Sale Doctrine in Copyright Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 16/1995, pp. 475–511.Google Scholar
Mills, Mary L.: New Technology and the Limitations of Copyright Law: An Argument for Finding Alternatives to Copyright Legislation in an Era of Rapid Technological Change, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 1989, pp. 307–339.Google Scholar
Mohn, Ludwig: Juristische Hilfsbücher für Studium und Praxis, Springer, Berlin, 1919.Google Scholar
Mok, M. Robert: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights: EC-wide or Worldwide? In: Schulze, Reiner (Ed.): Auslegung europäischen Privatrechts und angeglichenen Rechts, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 1999, pp. 89–95.Google Scholar
Morgan, Alexandra, Abbott, Paul and Stothers, Christopher: ECJ Rules That the Sale of Second-Hand E-Books Infringes Copyright, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 4/2020, pp. 236–238.Google Scholar
Morris, P. Sean: Beyond Trade: Global Digital Exhaustion in International Economic Regulation, Campbell Law Review, Fall 2013, pp. 107–145.Google Scholar
Mosley, C. Todd: Mourning the Loss of Copyright’s Unsung Hero: Destruction of the First Sale Doctrine, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 14/2015, pp. 235–262.Google Scholar
Mount, Dan: A Review of Public Library E-Lending Models, Civic Agenda European Unit, December 2014 (www.bibliotheksportal.de/fileadmin/user_upload/content/bibliotheken/international/Study_Public_Library_ELending_Models_2014.pdf).Google Scholar
Moyse, Pierre-Emmanuel: From Importation to Digital Exhaustion: A Canadian Copyright Perspective. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 478–497.Google Scholar
Mtima, Lateef: So Dark the CON(TU) of Man: The Quest for a Software Derivative Work Right in Section 117, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 70/2008, pp. 1–100.Google Scholar
Mtima, Lateef: The Idea Exclusions in Intellectual Property Law, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol 3/2020, pp. 343–391.Google Scholar
Mueller-Langer, Frank: Copyright and Parallel Trade. In: Watt, Richard (Ed.): Handbook on the Economics of Copyright – A Guide for Students and Teachers, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2014, pp. 287–310.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Deirdre K., and Schultz, Jason M: Neglecting the National Memory: How Copyright Term Extensions Compromise the Development of Digital Archives, Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, Vol. 4/2002, pp. 451–473.Google Scholar
Muñoz, Rodolphe, Case C-1/96, The Queen v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Compassion in World Farming Limited. Judgment of 19 March 1998, [1998] ECR I-1251, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 4/1999, pp. 831–839.Google Scholar
Mutimear, Jane: Merck v Primecrown: The Challenge to Merck v Stephar, European Competition Law Review, Vol. 2/1996, pp. 185–188.Google Scholar
Mylly, Tuomas: A Silhouette of Fortress Europe? International Exhaustion of Trade Mark Rights in the EU, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 7/2000, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Mysoor, Poorna: Exhaustion, Non-exhaustion and Implied Licence, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Vol. 6/2018, pp. 656–684.Google Scholar
Navarro, Arthur I.: Selected Recent Developments in Copyright, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 3/1995, pp. 107–114.Google Scholar
Naylor, David, and Parris, Emily: After ReDigi: Contrasting the EU and US Approaches to the Re-sale of Second-Hand Digital Assets, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 8/2013, pp. 487–490.Google Scholar
Newman, Joshua W.: Selling the Right to License: Examination of the First Sale Doctrine Through the Lens of UMG Recordings & Quanta Computer, Journal of Corporation Law, Summer 2010, pp. 849–866.Google Scholar
Ng Boyte, Alina: The Conceits of our Legal Imagination: Legal Fiction and the Concept of Deemed Authorship, Legislation and Public Policy, 2014, p. 707–762.Google Scholar
Nimmer, Melville B., and Nimmer, David: Nimmer on Copyright, Matthew Bender, 2013.Google Scholar
Norman, Helen: Perfume, Whisky and Leaping Cats of Prey: A UK Perspective on Three Recent Trade Mark Cases before the European Court of Justice, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 8/1998, pp. 306–312.Google Scholar
Norman, Helen: Parallel Imports from Non-EEA Member States: The Vision Remains Unclear, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 4/2000, pp. 159–170.Google Scholar
Norton, Thomas B.: Watch What You *Bleeping* Want: Interpretation of Statutes Dealing with Advancing Technology in Light of the Ninth Circuit Case of Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. VidAngel, Inc., Journal of Intellectual Property Law, Fall 2018, pp. 287–314.Google Scholar
Nowak, Peter: Netflix Launches Canadian Movie Service, CBCNews, September 22, 2010 (www.cbc.ca/news/technology/netflix-launches-canadian-movie-service-1.872505).Google Scholar
Nugent, Annabel: Ed Sheeran’s First-Ever Demo Written Aged 13 Sells for £50,000, Independent, September 9, 2020 (www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/ed-sheeran-first-demo-album-auction-b420874.html).Google Scholar
O’Connor, Sean M.: The Overlooked French Influence on the Intellectual Property Clause, The University of Chicago Law Review, 2015, pp. 733–830.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Sean M.: Distinguishing Different Kinds of Property in Patents and Copyrights, George Mason Law Review, Fall 2019, pp. 205–261.Google Scholar
Oderkerk, Marieke: The Importance of Context: Selecting Legal Systems in Comparative Legal Research, Netherlands International Law Review, XLVIII, 2001, pp. 293–318.Google Scholar
O’Dwyer, Anthony: The Artists’ Resale Right Directive 2001/84: Reflecting upon a Distasteful Encounter of Art and Commerce, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 1/2018, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
Ohly, Ansgar: Ohly, Ansgar: Unmittelbare und mittelbare Verletzung des Rechts der öffentlichen Wiedergabe nach dem “Córdoba”-Urteil des EuGH, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 10/2018, pp. 996–1004.Google Scholar
Ohly, Ansgar: Anmerkungen zur “Öffentliche Wiedergabe” durch Verkauf “gebrauchter” E-Books – NUV ua/Tom Kabinet, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 2/2020, pp. 184–186.Google Scholar
Oliar, Dotan: Making Sense of the Intellectual Property Clause: Promotion of Progress as a Limitation on Congress’s Intellectual Property Power, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 94/2006, pp. 1771–1845.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Megan: How Netflix Bankrupted and Destroyed Blockbuster, Social Times, March 1, 2011, www.businessinsider.com/how-netflix-bankruptedand-destroyed-blockbuster-infographic-2011-3.Google Scholar
Opri, Debra A.: Video Rentals and the First Sale Doctrine: The Deficiency of Proposed Legislation, Whittier Law Review, Vol. 8/1986, pp. 331–352.Google Scholar
Oprysk, Liliia: “Digital” Exhaustion and the EU (Digital) Single Market. In: Synodinou, Tatiana-Eleni, Jougleux, Philippe, Markou, Christiana, and Prastitou, Thalia (Eds.): EU Internet Law in the Digital Era, Springer, Cham, 2019a, pp. 161–180.Google Scholar
Oprysk, Liliia: The CJEU Judgment in Ranks and Vasilevics: You Can Buy a Used License, but Will a Copy Follow? In: Holm, Cyril (Ed.): Secure Digitalisation. Nordic Yearbook of Law and Informatics 2016–2018, Poseidon Förlag AB, 2019b, pp. 77–82.Google Scholar
Oprysk, Liliia: Secondary Communication Under the EU Copyright Acquis after Tom Kabinet, JIPITEC, Vol. 2/2020, 200–214.Google Scholar
Oprysk, Liliia, and Sein, Karin: Limitations in End-User Licensing Agreements: Is There a Lack of Conformity Under the New Digital Content Directive?, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Vol. 5/2020, pp. 594–623.Google Scholar
Oprysk, Liliia, Matulevičius, Raimundas, and Kelli, Aleksei: Development of a Secondary Market for E-books – The Case of Amazon, JIPITEC, Vol. 2/2017, 128–138.Google Scholar
Overdijk, Tjerd, van der Putt, Polo, de Vries, Eva, and Schafft, Thomas: Exhaustion and Software Resale Rights – A Comparison between the European Exhaustion Doctrine and the U.S. First Sale Doctrine in the Light of Recent Case Law, Computer Law Review International, Vol. 2/2011, pp. 33–39.Google Scholar
Owen, Laura: Like Amazon, Apple Wants to Create a Marketplace for Used Digital Goods, Gigaom, March 8, 2013 (https://gigaom.com/2013/03/08/like-amazon-apple-wants-to-create-a-marketplace-for-used-digital-goods/).Google Scholar
Pagenberg, Jochen: The Exhaustion Principle and “Silhouette” Case, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, Vol. 1/1999, pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
Pahlow, Louis: Lizenzen als handelbare Güter? Nutzungrecht und Nutzunggegenstand im Softwareverkehr, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum – Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 218–238.Google Scholar
Pallante, Maria A.: The Next Great Copyright Act, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Vol. 36/2013, pp. 315–344.Google Scholar
Parker, James: Comparing Strategies of the 2d Punic War: Rome’s Strategic Victory over the Tactical/Operational Genius, Hannibal Barca, USAWC Strategy Research Project, US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, 2001 (www.iwar.org.uk/military/resources/hannibal/Parker_J_P_01.pdf).Google Scholar
Patry, William: In Praise of the Betamax Decision: An Examination of Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Sony Corp. of America, South Texas Law Journal, Vol. 22/1982, pp. 211–248.Google Scholar
Patry, William: Copyright Law and Practice, Vol. 2, Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC, 1994.Google Scholar
Patry, William: Patry on Copyright, Thomson Reuters, 2016.Google Scholar
Patterson, L. Ray, Birch, Stanley F, and Joyce, Craig: A Unified Theory of Copyright – Chapter 2: The Copyright Clause and Copyright History, Houston Law Review, Vol. 46/2009, pp. 215–397.Google Scholar
Pegoraro, Rob: The Paper-to-Pixels Workaround Activists Want to Use to Keep Libraries Online, Forbes, March 27, 2021 (www.forbes.com/sites/robpegoraro/2021/03/27/the-paper-to-pixels-workaround-activists-want-to-use-to-keep-libraries-online/).Google Scholar
Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus: Das Territorialitätprinzip im Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht vor dem Hintergrund der technischen Entwicklungen, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 1/2006, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, Shira: Resale Royalties for Artists: An Analysis of the Register of Copyrights’ Report, Journal of Copyright Society, 1983, pp. 284–314.Google Scholar
Perzanowski, Aaron, and Hoofnagle, Chris Jay: What We Buy When We Buy Now, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, January 2017, pp. 315–378.Google Scholar
Perzanowski, Aaron, and Schultz, Jason: Digital Exhaustion, UCLA Law Review, April 2011, pp. 889–946.Google Scholar
Perzanowski, Aaron, and Schultz, Jason: Legislating Digital Exhaustion, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Symposium 2014, pp. 1535–1557.Google Scholar
Perzanowski, Aaron, and Schultz, Jason: The End of Ownership – Personal Property in the Digital Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2016.Google Scholar
Peter, Christof: Urheberrechtliche Erschöpfung bei digitalen Gütern, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 6/2019, pp. 490–501.Google Scholar
Petty, M. Elizabeth: Rauschenberg, Royalties, and Artists’ Rights: Potential Droit de Suite Legislation in the United States, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 977–1009.Google Scholar
Pfennig, Gerhard: The Resale Right of Artists (droit de suite), Copyright Bulletin, Vol. 3/1997, pp. 20–29.Google Scholar
Pickton, Miggie: Ebook Price Increases from Three Publishers, Research Support Hub, July 5, 2013 (https://researchsupporthub.northampton.ac.uk/2013/07/05/ebook-price-increases-from-three-publishers/).Google Scholar
Pila, Justine, and Torremans, Pauk: European Intellectual Property Law, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Glasgow, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitell, Lisa R.: Non-transferability of Software Licences in the European Union, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 9/2004, pp. 390–401.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander B.: A Second Look at First Sale: An International Look at U.S. Copyright Exhaustion, Journal of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 1/2011, pp. 201–230.Google Scholar
Porter, Jon: Spotify Surges Past 300M Users After Successful Russia Launch, The Verge, October 29, 2020 (www.theverge.com/2020/10/29/21539759/spotify-320-million-monthly-active-users-155-subscribers-q3-2020-earnings).Google Scholar
Puig, Antoni Rubí: Copyright Exhaustion Rationales and Used Software – A Law and Economics Approach to Oracle v. UsedSoft, JIPITEC, Vol. 3/2013, pp. 159–178.Google Scholar
Quintais, João Pedro: Untangling the Hyperlinking Web: In Search of the Online Right of Communication to the Public, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 5/2018, pp. 385–420.Google Scholar
Racine, Pierre-Luc: Copyright Digital Exhaustion: A Public Interest Approach for the Retransfer of Licensed Digital Content in Canada, Intellectual Property Journal, September 2019, pp. 361–383.Google Scholar
Rahmatian, Andreas: A Comparison of German Moveable Property Law and English Personal Property Law, Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 1/2010, pp. 197–248.Google Scholar
Ramalho, Ana: Copyright Law-Making in the EU: What Lies under the “International Market” Mask?, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 208–224.Google Scholar
Raue, Benjamin: Öffentliche Wiedergabe auf Webseite durch Einstellen einer anderweitig zugänglich gemachten Fotografie, GPR - Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union, Vol. 4/2019, pp. 165–167.Google Scholar
Rauer, Nils, and Ettig, Diana: Can E-Books and Other Digital Works Be Resold?, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 9/2015, pp. 713–716.Google Scholar
Raymond, Art: VidAngel ordered to pay $62 million to Disney, others for copyright infringement, Deseret News, June 17, 2019 (www.deseret.com/2019/6/17/20675845/vidangel-ordered-to-pay-62-million-to-disney-others-for-copyright-infringement).Google Scholar
Reddy, Michael B.: The Droit de Suite: Why American Fine Artists Should Have the Right to a Resale Royalty, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal, 1995, pp. 509–546.Google Scholar
Reese, R. Anthony: The First Sale Doctrine in the Era of Digital Networks, Boston College Law Review, March 2003, pp. 577–652.Google Scholar
Rehbinder, Manfred: Urheberrecht, 15., neubearbeitete Auflage, C. H. Beck, München, 2008.Google Scholar
Reimer, Dietrich: Der Erschöpfungsgrundsatz im Urheberrecht und gewerblichen Rechtsschutz unter Berücksichtigung der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 6/1972, pp. 221–234.Google Scholar
Reimer, Dietrich: Copyright Law and the Free Movement of Goods, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 4/1981, pp. 493–511.Google Scholar
Reimer, Dietrich: Principle of Exhaustion of Rights, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 3/1982, pp. 362–367.Google Scholar
Reinbothe, Jörg: The EC Directive on Rental and Lending Rights and Rights Related to Copyright. In: Jehoram, Herman Cohen, Keuchenius, Petra, and Seignette, Jacqueline (Eds.): Audiovisual Media and Copyright in Europe, Kluwer, Deventer, 1999, pp. 41–51.Google Scholar
Reinbothe, Jörg, and von Lewinski, Silke: The WIPO Treaties 1996 – The WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, Commentary and Legal Analysis, Butterworths Lexis Nexis, London, 2002.Google Scholar
Reiner, Richard F.: Home Videorecording: Fair Use or Infringement?, Southern California Law Review, 1978–1979, pp. 573–634.Google Scholar
Reis, Sarah: Toward a “Digital Transfer Doctrine”? The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Era, Northwestern University Law Review, 2015, pp. 173–208.Google Scholar
Reischl, Gerhard: Industrial Property and Copyright before the European Court of Justice, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 13/1982, pp. 415–430.Google Scholar
Rendas, Tito: Lex Specialis(sima): Videogames and Technological Protection Measures in EU Copyright Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 1/2015, pp. 39–45.Google Scholar
Research and Markets: Global E-Book Market Growth, Trends and Forecast (2018–2023): In 2013, E-Books Held 12.3% of Total Books Sales, and the Percentage Is Expected to Rise to 25.8% by the End of 2018, Globe Newswire, December 10, 2018 (www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/12/10/1664294/0/en/Global-E-Book-Market-Growth-Trends-and-Forecast-2018-2023-In-2013-E-Books-Held-12-3-of-Total-Books-Sales-and-the-Percentage-is-Expected-to-Rise-to-25-8-by-the-End-of-2018.html).Google Scholar
Reyburn, Scott: JPG File Sells for $69 Million, as “NFT Mania” Gathers Pace, New York Times, March 11, 2021 (www.nytimes.com/2021/03/11/arts/design/nft-auction-christies-beeple.html).Google Scholar
Richelieu, William: Gray Days Ahead? The Impact of Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L’anza Research International, Inc., Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 27/2000, pp. 827–859.Google Scholar
Ricketson, Sam: WIPO Study in Limitations and Exceptions of Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Environment, Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, Ninth Session, Geneva, June 23–27, 2003 (www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_9/sccr_9_7.pdf).Google Scholar
Ricketson, Sam: Proposed International Treaty on Droit de Suite/Resale Royalty Right for Visual Artists, Revue Internationale de Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 3/2015, pp. 3–263.Google Scholar
Ricketson, Sam, and Ginsburg, Jane C.: International Copyrights and Neighboring Rights – Berne Convention and Beyond, 2nd ed., Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006.Google Scholar
Riehl, Damien, and Kassim, Jumi: Is “Buying” Digital Content Just “Renting” for Life? Contemplating a Digital First-Sale Doctrine, William Mitchell Law Review, Vol. 40/2014, pp. 783–812.Google Scholar
Rigamonti, Cyrill P.: Der Handel mit Gebrauchtsoftware nach schweizerischem Urheberrecht, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 43/2009, pp. 14–27.Google Scholar
Rizzuto, Francesco: The European Court of Justice Rules in Tom Kabinet that the Exhaustion of Rights in Copyright Has Little Place in the Age of Online Digital Formats, Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, Vol. 4/2020, pp. 108–115.Google Scholar
Roa, John C.: Gray Market Goods and the First Sale Doctrine: The Last Nail in the Coffin?, Mississippi College Law Review, Vol. 20/1999, pp. 211–234.Google Scholar
Rognstad, Ole-Andreas: Legally Flawed but Politically Sound? Digital Exhaustion of Copyright in Europe after UsedSoft, Oslo Law Review, Vol. 1/2014, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Rosati, Eleonora: Online Copyright Exhaustion in a Post-Allposters World, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 9/2015, pp. 673–681.Google Scholar
Rosati, Eleonora: Brexit and Copyright: A Pyrrhic Victory, Intellectual Property Forum, March 2019, pp. 62–65.Google Scholar
Rosati, Eleonora: Ebooks and Mass Digitization Projects: The Role of Licensing. In: Aplin, Tanya (Ed.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Digital Technologies, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020a, pp. 201–216.Google Scholar
Rosati, Eleonora: Round-up of CJEU Copyright Decisions in 2019, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 4/2020b, pp. 264–275.Google Scholar
Rosén, Jan: Free Trade, Competition and Copyright: Viewpoints from the Nordic EFTA Countries, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 2/1987, pp. 120–131.Google Scholar
Rothnie, Warwick A.: Parallel Imports, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1993.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Robert H., Evitt, Emily F, and Williams, Matthew: The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age, Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, March 2010, pp. 23–27.Google Scholar
Rott, Peter: Download of Copyright-Protected Internet Content and the Role of (Consumer) Contract Law, Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 4/2008, pp. 441–457.Google Scholar
Röttinger, Moritz: Copyright and the Rules on the Free Movement of Goods, Revue Internationale de Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 3/1993, pp. 50–127.Google Scholar
Rub, Guy A.: The Economics of Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: The Efficiency of a Balanced Approach to the First Sale Doctrine, Fordham Law Review Res Gestae, Vol. 81/2013, pp. 41–54.Google Scholar
Rub, Guy A.: The Unconvincing Case for Resale Royalties, The Yale Law Journal Forum, 2014, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Rub, Guy A.: Rebalancing Copyright Exhaustion, Emory Law Journal, Vol. 64/2015, pp. 741–817.Google Scholar
Rub, Guy A.: Experimenting with State-Enacted Resale Rights, Kentucky Law Journal, Vol. 107/2018, pp. 651–684.Google Scholar
Rubí-Puig, Antoni: Fairness v. Welfare in the Discussion of Copyright Law and Policies: Royalties for the Resale of Artworks as a Case Study. In: Gervais, Daniel J. (Ed.): Fairness, Morality and Ordre Public in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, pp. 76–95.Google Scholar
Rucz, Melinda: Does the Doctrine of Exhaustion Apply to Videogames Purchased Digitally? French Court Says Oui, Kluwer Copyright Blog, December 12, 2019 (http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/12/12/does-the-doctrine-of-exhaustion-apply-to-videogames-purchased-digitally-french-court-says-oui/).Google Scholar
Ruffler, Friedrich: Is Trading in Used Software an Infringement of Copyright? The Perspective of European Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 6/2011, pp. 375–383.Google Scholar
Runge, Philipp: Prinzip der gemeinschaftsweiten Erschöpfung im Urheberrecht, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, Vol. 21/2006, pp. 666–667.Google Scholar
Rutz, Christian: Germany: Copyright – Exhaustion of Rights and Re-sale of Pre-installed Software, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 6/2009, pp. N48–50.Google Scholar
Sanders, Rick: Will Professor Nimmer’s Change of Heart on File Sharing Matter?, Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, Summer 2013, pp. 857–881.Google Scholar
Sang, Yoonmo: Toward Cultural Democracy: Digital First Sale Doctrine and Copyright, Communication Law and Policy, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 221–249.Google Scholar
Sang, Yoonmo: Revisiting Copyright Theories: Democratic Culture and the Resale of Digital Goods, Communication Theory, Vol. 3/2018, pp. 277–296.Google Scholar
Savič, Maša: The CJEU Allposters Case: Beginning of the End of Digital Exhaustion?, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 6/2015a, pp. 389–394.Google Scholar
Savič, Maša: The Legality of Resale of Digital Content after UsedSoft in Subsequent German and CJEU Case Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 7/2015b, pp. 414–429.Google Scholar
Schack, Haimo: Urheber- und Urheber vertragsrecht, Vol. 3, Neubearbeitete Auflage, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2005.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Michael: Legal Issues in Peer-to-Peer File Sharing, Focusing on the Making Available Right. In: Strowel, Alain (Ed.): Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Secondary Liability in Copyright Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2009, pp. 43–70.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Thomas Rainer: Gewährleistung für digitale Inhalte – neuer Vorschlag, alte Probleme. In: Staudegger, Elisabeth and Thiele, Clemens (Eds.): Jahrbuch Geistiges Eigentum 2017, NWV, 2017, pp. 279–314.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Thomas Rainer: UsedSoft ≠ UsedBook – eine Besprechung des EuGH-Urteils “Tom Kabinet,” JusIT – Zeitschrift für IT-Recht, Rechtsinformation und Datenschutz, Vol. 2/2020, no. 5.Google Scholar
Schneider, Jochen, and Spindler, Gerald: Der Kampf um die gebrauchte Software – Revolution im Urheberrecht? – Das Urteil des EuGH vom 3.7.2012 – Rs. C-128/11 – “UsedSoft” Gebrauchtsoftware, Computer und Recht, Vol. 8/2012, pp. 492–493.Google Scholar
Schneider, Marius, and Maillefer, Christophe: How Europe Deals with Private Imports of Counterfeit and Pirated Goods, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 4/2015, pp. 262–268.Google Scholar
Scholz, Jochen: Mögliche vertragliche Gestaltungen zur Weitergabe von Software nach “UsedSoft II,” Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 2/2015, pp. 142–150.Google Scholar
Schonhofen, Sven: UsedSoft and Its Aftermath: The Resale of Digital Content in the European Union, Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 16/2015, pp. 262–297.Google Scholar
Schovsbo, Jens: Integrating Consumer Rights into Copyright Law: From a European Perspective, Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 4/2008, pp. 393–408.Google Scholar
Schovsbo, Jens: The Exhaustion of Rights and Common Principles of European Intellectual Property Law. In: Ohly, Ansgar (Ed.): Common Principles of European Intellectual Property Law, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2010, pp. 169–187.Google Scholar
Schovsbo, Jens: Constitutional Foundations and Constitutionalization of IP Law – A Tale of Different Stories?, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 4/2015, pp. 383–394.Google Scholar
Schricker, Gerhard: Harmonization of Copyright in the European Economic Community, NIR – Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd, Vol. 4/1988, pp. 489–505.Google Scholar
Schricker, Gerhard: Harmonization of Copyright in the European Economic Community, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 4/1989, pp. 466–484.Google Scholar
Schricker, Gerhard: Urheberrecht – Kommentar, Vol. 3, Neubearbeitete Auflage, C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München, 2006.Google Scholar
Schulder, Diane B.: Art Proceeds Act: A Study of the Droit de Suite and a Proposed Enactment for the United States, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 61/1966, pp. 19–43.Google Scholar
Schulte-Nölke, Hans: Incorporation of Standard Contract Terms on Websites Observations on the American Law Institute’s Restatement of Consumer Contract Law, European Review of Contract Law, Vol. 2/2019, pp. 103–129.Google Scholar
Schulze, Ellen Franziska: Resale of Digital Content Such as Music, Films or eBooks under European Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 1/2014, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
Schulze, Gernot: Anspruch auf Folgerechtsvergütungen bei Tod des Urhebers, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 6/2010, pp. 529–530.Google Scholar
Schuster, Edmund: Cloud Crypto Land, The Modern Law Review, 2020, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Schwabach, Aaron: The Internet Archive’s National Emergency Library: Is There an Emergency Fair Use Superpower?, Northwestern Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, March 2021, pp. 187–216.Google Scholar
Scott, Mark: In Global Expansion, Netflix Makes Friends with Carriers, New York Times, February 26, 2017 (www.nytimes.com/2017/02/26/technology/netflix-streaming-expansion-mwc.html).Google Scholar
Sein, Karin, and Spindler, Gerald: The New Directive on Contracts for Supply of Digital Content and Digital Services – Conformity Criteria, Remedies and Modifications – Part 2, European Review of Contract Law, Vol. 4/2019, pp. 365–391.Google Scholar
Senftleben, Martin: Die Fortschreibung des urheberrechtlichen Erschöpfungsgrundsatzes im digitalen Umfeld, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, Vol. 40/2012, pp. 2924–2927.Google Scholar
Serra, Theodore: Rebalancing at Resale: ReDigi, Royalties, and the Digital Secondary Market, Boston University Law Review, October 2013, pp. 1753–1801.Google Scholar
Seville, Catherine: Developments in United Kingdom Copyright Law, Revue Internationale de Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 2/2015, pp. 50–151.Google Scholar
Seville, Catherine: EU Intellectual Property Law and Policy, 2nd ed., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016.Google Scholar
Sganga, Caterina: A Plea for Digital Exhaustion in EU Copyright Law, JIPITEC, Vol. 3/2018, pp. 211–239.Google Scholar
Sganga, Caterina: Is the Digital Exhaustion Debate Really Exhausted? Some Afterthoughts on the Grand Chamber Decision in Tom Kabinet (C-263/18), Kluwer Copyright Blog, May 19, 2020 (http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2020/05/19/is-the-digital-exhaustion-debate-really-exhausted-some-afterthoughts-on-the-grand-chamber-decision-in-tom-kabinet-c-263-18/).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Doug: One Clear Casualty of the Streaming Wars: Profit, The Startup, October 27, 2020 (https://medium.com/swlh/one-clear-casualty-of-the-streaming-wars-profit-683304b3055d).Google Scholar
Shaverdian, Phillip: Blockchain-based Digital Assets and the Case for Revisiting Copyright’s First Sale Doctrine, UCLA Law Review (online), February 19, 2019 (www.uclalawreview.org/blockchain-based-digital-assets-and-the-case-for-revisiting-copyrights-first-sale-doctrine-2/).Google Scholar
Sheinblatt, Julie S.: The WIPO Copyright Treaty, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 1998, pp. 535–550.Google Scholar
Shemtov, Noam: Software and Graphical User Interfaces. In: Aplin, Tanya (Ed.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Digital Technologies, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, pp. 2–25.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Jenny Lynn: Does the Rise of Property Rights Theory Defeat Copyright’s First Sale Doctrine?, Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 52/2012, pp. 297–372.Google Scholar
Shinall, Michael A.: Software & Copyright Exhaustion: A Proposal to Amend §117 & Restore Balance to the Copyright System, Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 24/2014, pp. 365–405.Google Scholar
Shipley, David E.: Droit de Suite, Copyright’s First Sale Doctrine and Preemption of State Law, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, Winter, 2017, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
Sikich, Adam W.: Buyer Beware: The Threat to the First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age, Journal of Internet Law, January 2011, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Sirinelli, Pierre: Exceptions and Limits to Copyright and Neighboring Rights, Workshop on implementation issues of the WIPO copyright treaty (WCT) and the WIPO performances and phonograms treaty (WPPT), Geneva, December 6 and 7, 1999, WIPO (www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=1266).Google Scholar
Sisario, Ben: Site to Resell Music Files Has Critics, New York Times, November 14, 2011 (www.nytimes.com/2011/11/15/business/media/reselling-of-music-files-is-contested.html).Google Scholar
Sisario, Ben, and Russell, Karl: In Shift to Streaming, Music Business Has Lost Billions, New York Times, March 24, 2016 (www.nytimes.com/2016/03/25/%20business/media/music-sales-remain-steady-but-lucrative-cd-sales-decline.html).Google Scholar
Slotboom, Marco M.: The Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights – Different Approaches in EC and WTO Law, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, May 2003, pp. 421–440.Google Scholar
Sluiter, Saba: The Dutch Courts Apply UsedSoft to the Resale of eBooks, Kluwer Copyright Blog, January 28, 2015 (http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2015/01/28/the-dutch-courts-apply-usedsoft-to-the-resale-of-ebooks/).Google Scholar
Smith, B. Chase: International or National Exhaustion: The Need for Legislative Intervention Regarding the First Sale Doctrine, Wake Forest Journal of Business and Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 14/2014, pp. 578–598.Google Scholar
Smith, Judith Klerman: The Computer Software Rental Act: Amending the “First Sale Doctrine” to Protect Computer Software Copyright, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 20/1987, pp. 1613–1639. Google Scholar
Snijders, Thom, and van Deursen, Stijn: The Road Not Taken – the CJEU Sheds Light on the Role of Fundamental Rights in the European Copyright Framework – a Case Note on the Pelham, Spiegel Online and Funnke Medien Decisions, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 9/2019, pp. 1176–1190.Google Scholar
Solsman, Joan E.: Netflix Subscriber Growth Soars Past 200 Million Members, CNET, January 20, 2021 (www.cnet.com/news/netflix-fourth-quarter-subscribers-soar-past-200-million-members-stock/).Google Scholar
Soma, John T., and Kugler, Michael K.: Why Rent When You Can Own? How ReDigi, Apple, and Amazon Will Use the Cloud and the Digital First Sale Doctrine to Resell Music, E-Books, Games, and Movies, North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, March 2014, pp. 425–461.Google Scholar
Sosnitza, Olaf: Gemeinschaftsrechtliche Vorgaben und urheberrechtlicher Gestaltungsspielraum für den Handel mit gebrauchter Software, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 7/2009, pp. 521–526.Google Scholar
Spedicato, Giorgio: Online Exhaustion and the Boundaries of Interpretation. In: Caso, Roberto and Giovanella, Federica (Eds.): Balancing Copyright Law in the Digital Age – Comparative Perspectives, Springer, Berlin, 2015, pp. 27–64.Google Scholar
Spedicato, Giorgio: Digital Lending and Public Access to Knowledge. In: Lai, Jessica C and Dominicé, Antoinette Maget (Eds.): Intellectual Property and Access to Im/material Goods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 149–175.Google Scholar
Spitz, Brad: Guide to Copyright in France, Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2015.Google Scholar
Spoor, J. H., Verkade, D. W. F., and Visser, D. J. G.: Auteursrecht, Kluwer, Deventer, 2005.Google Scholar
Stazi, Andrea: Digital Copyright and Consumer/User Protection: Moving toward a New Framework?, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 2/2012, pp. 158–174.Google Scholar
Steimer, Maureen: Restoring the Balance: Bringing Back Consumers Rights in UMG Recordings v. Augusto by Reaffirming the First Sale Doctrine in Copyright Law, Villanova Sports and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 16/2009, pp. 313–342.Google Scholar
Stephens, Katherine: Brexit: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights, Bird & Bird News Centre, January 2020 (www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2019/uk/exhaustion-of-intellectual-property-rights-post-brexit).Google Scholar
Sterling, J. A. L.: World Copyright Law, Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1998.Google Scholar
Stern, Richard H.: Some Reflections on Parallel Importation of Copyrighted Products into the United States and the Relation of the Exhaustion Doctrine to the Doctrine of Implied Licence, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 4/1989, pp. 119–127.Google Scholar
Stern, Richard H.: USA: Copyright – Transnational Exhaustion of Rights, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/2009, pp. N31–32.Google Scholar
Stokes, Simon: Copyright and Artistic Practice: Allposters Revisited, Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 5/2016, pp. 172–174.Google Scholar
Stokes, Simon: Art and Copyright, 3rd ed., Hart, Oxford, 2021.Google Scholar
Stothers, Christopher: When Is Copyright Exhausted by a Software Licence? UsedSoft v. Oracle, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 11/2012, pp. 787–791.Google Scholar
Streitfeld, David: Amazon Offers All-You-Can-Eat Books; Authors Turn Up Noses, New York Times, December 27, 2014 (www.nytimes.com/2014/12/28/technology/amazon-offers-all-you-can-eat-books-authors-turn-up-noses.html).Google Scholar
Strowel, Alain (Ed.): Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Secondary Liability in Copyright Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2009.Google Scholar
Sun, Haochen: Higher Education as a Luxury Good, NYU Journal of Law & Business, Fall 2020, pp. 153–209.Google Scholar
Synodinou, Tatiana Eleni: E-Books, a New Page in the History of Copyright Law?, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 4/2013, pp. 220–227.Google Scholar
Synodinou, Tatiana Eleni: Lawfulness for Users in European Copyright Law: Acquis and Perspectives, JIPITEC, Vol. 1/2019, pp. 20–37.Google Scholar
Szpunar, Maciej: Territoriality of Union Law in the Era of Globalization. In: Petrlík, David, Bobek, Michal and Passer, Jan M. (Eds.): Evolution des rapports entre les ordres juridiques de l’Union européenne, international et nationaux. Liber Amicorum Jiří Malenovský, Bruylant, Bruxelles, 2020, pp. 149–168.Google Scholar
Tai, Eric Tjong Tjin: Exhaustion and Online Delivery of Digital Works, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 5/2003, pp. 207–211.Google Scholar
Targosz, Tomasz: Exhaustion in Digital Products and the “Accidental” Impact on the Balance of Interests in Copyright Law. In: Bently, Lionel, Suthersanen, Uma, and Torremans, Paul (Eds.): Global Copyright – Three Hundred Years since the Statute of Anne, from 1709 to Cyberspace, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2010, pp. 337–353.Google Scholar
Tobin, Jonathan C.: Licensing as a Means of Providing Affordability and Accessibility in Digital Markets: Alternatives to a Digital First Sale Doctrine, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, Vol. 93/2011, pp. 167–187.Google Scholar
Torremans, Paul L. C.: The Future Implications of the UsedSoft Decision, CREATe Working Paper 2014/2, February 2014, p. 1–10.Google Scholar
Tournier, Alphonse: L’arrêt de Bruxelles du 9 mai 1953 sur l’usage radiophonique des disques du commerce, Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 1/1953, pp. 10–43.Google Scholar
Tournier, Alphonse: Quelques considérations nouvelles sur l’usage radiphonique des disques du commerce, Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 4/1961, pp. 84–107.Google Scholar
Trampuž, Miha: An Oracle on European Copyright Exhaustion, Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur, Vol. 3/2016, pp. 155–255.Google Scholar
Trapova, Alina and Fava, Emanuele: Aren’t We All Exhausted Already? EU Copyright Exhaustion and Video Game Resales in the Games-as-a-Service Era, Interactive Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 2/2020, pp. 77–93.Google Scholar
Travers, Noel: Rental Rights and the Specific Subject-Matter of Copyright in Community Law, European Law Review, Vol. 2/1999, pp. 171–177.Google Scholar
Trimble, Marketa: The Marrakesh Treaty and the Targeted Uses of Copyright Exhaustion. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 461–477.Google Scholar
Tritton, Guy: Intellectual Property in Europe, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2002.Google Scholar
Tseng, David: Bypassed: The Kirtsaeng Decision’s Underwhelming Impact on Exhaustion, AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Vol. 43/2015, pp. 559–593.Google Scholar
Tucker, Annette V.: The Validity of the Manufacturing Clause of the United States Copyright Code as Challenged by Trade Partners and Copyright Owners, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Summer 1985, pp. 577–624.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephanie B.: The Artist’s Resale Royalty Right: Overcoming the Information Problem, UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 2/2012, pp. 329–370.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephanie B.: The Artist’s Resale Royalty Right: Overcoming the Information Problem, UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 19/2014, pp. 329–370.Google Scholar
Tweney, Dylan F.: Amazon Sells More E-Books than Hardcovers, WIRED, July 19, 2010 (www.wired.com/2010/07/amazon-more-e-books-than-hardcovers/).Google Scholar
Twigg-Flesner, Christian: Conformity of Goods and Digital Content/Digital Services. In: Amayuelas, Esther Arroyo and Lapuente, Sergio Cámara (Eds.): El Derecho privado en el nuevo paradigma digital, Barcelona-Madrid, Marcial Pons, 2020, pp. 49–78.Google Scholar
Ubertazzi, Luigi Carlo: Copyright and the Free Movement of Goods, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 1/1985, pp. 46–75.Google Scholar
Ulmer, Eugen: The “Droit de Suite” in International Copyright Law, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 1/1975, pp. 12–28. Google Scholar
Ulmer, Eugen: Die Entscheidungen zur Kabelübertragung von Rundfunksendungen im Lichte urheberrechtlicher Grundsätze, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 6/1981, pp. 372–378.Google Scholar
UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development: Resource Book on TRIPS and Development, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.Google Scholar
Vacca, Ryan: Expanding Preferential Treatment under the Record Rental Amendment beyond the Music Industry, Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 11/2007, pp. 605–632.Google Scholar
Vale, Shannon T., and Brennan, Daniel J: Recent Developments in Copyright Law, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 4/1996, pp. 321–334.Google Scholar
Vanden Heuvel, Sage: Fighting the First Sale Doctrine: Strategies for a Struggling Film Industry, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, Vol. 18/2012, pp. 661–689.Google Scholar
Van Calster, Geert: Case Law: Case C-1/96, The Queen v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Compassion in World Farming Limited [1998] ECR 1–1251, The Columbia Journal of European Law, Vol. 1/2000, pp. 115–123.Google Scholar
Vanherpe, Jozefien: White Smoke, but Smoke Nonetheless: Some (Burning) Questions Regarding the Directives on Sale of Goods and Supply of Digital Content, European Review of Private Law, Vol. 2/2020, pp. 251–274.Google Scholar
Van Hoecke, Mark: Methodology of Comparative Legal Research, Law and Method, 2015, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Van Oostveen, Dirk: Netherlands: Copyright, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 3/1997, pp. D74–75.Google Scholar
Verbraeken, Erik: The Exhaustion Theory Is Not Yet Exhausted, les Nouvelles, March 2013, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
Verellen, Thomas: Opinion 3/15 on the Marrakesh Treaty: ECJ Reaffirms Narrow “Minimum Harmonisation” Exception to ERTA Principle, European Law Blog, March 1, 2017 (https://europeanlawblog.eu/2017/03/01/opinion-315-on-the-marrakesh-treaty-ecj-reaffirms-narrow-minimum-harmonisation-exception-to-erta-principle/).Google Scholar
Verkade, Feer: “First-Sale” or Exhaustion Doctrine in the Netherlands. In: Hugenholtz, P. Bernt, Quaedvlieg, Antoon, and Visser, Dirk (Eds.): A Century of Dutch Copyright Law: Auteurswet 1912–2012, deLex, Amsterdam, 2012, pp. 291–305.Google Scholar
Verma, S. K.: Exhaustion of Intellectual Property Rights and Free Trade – Article 6 of the TRIPS Agreement, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 5/1998, pp. 534–567.Google Scholar
Villasenor, John: Rethinking a Digital First Sale Doctrine in a Post-Kirtsaeng World: The Case for Caution, CPI Antitrust Chronicle, May 2013, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Vinje, Thomas, Marsland, Vanessa, and Gärtner, Anette: Software Licensing after Oracle v. UsedSoft – Implications of Oracle v. UsedSoft (C-128/11) for European Copyright Law, Computer Law Review International, Vol. 4/2012, pp. 97–102.Google Scholar
von Lewinski, Silke: Proposed EC Directive on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society as It Progresses, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 7/1999, pp. 767–782.Google Scholar
von Lewinski, Silke: International Exhaustion of the Distribution Right under EC Copyright Law?, European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 7/2005, pp. 233–236.Google Scholar
von Lewinski, Silke: International Copyright Law and Policy, Oxford University Press, New York, 2008.Google Scholar
von Lewinski, Silke: Proposed EC Directive on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society as It Progresses, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 7/2014, pp. 767–782.Google Scholar
von Ungern-Sternberg, Joachim: Erschöpfung des Verbreitungsrechts und Vermietung von Videokassetten, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 4/1984, pp. 262–267.Google Scholar
Völtz, Gregor: Das Kriterium der “neuen Öffentlichkeit” im Urheberrecht, Computer und Recht, Vol. 11/2014, pp. 721–726.Google Scholar
Walter, Michel M.: Zum Vermieten von Werken der angewandten Kunst, Medien und Recht, Vol. 5/2008, pp. 246–248.Google Scholar
Walter, Michel M.: Das EuGH-Urteil “Stichting Leenrecht”: Das Vermiet- und Verleihrecht und die Erschöpfung des Verbreitungsrechts bei E-Books, Medien und Recht, Vol. 7-8/2016, pp. 333–336.Google Scholar
Walter, Michel M., and von Lewinski, Silke: European Copyright Law – A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010.Google Scholar
Wandtke, Artur-Axel, and von Gerlach, Felix-Tessen: Die urheberrechtliche Rechtmäßigkeit der Nutzung von Audio-Video Streaminginhalten im Internet, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 7/2013, pp. 676–683.Google Scholar
Weicher, Michael B.: K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.: A Black Decision for the Gray Market, American University Law Review, Vol. 38/1989, pp. 463–489.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Karl Egbert, and Burkhardt, Emanuel H: Urheberrecht für die Praxis, Vol. 5, Vollständig überarbeitete Auflage, Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, Köln, 2009.Google Scholar
Westkamp, Guido: Exhaustion and the Internet as a Distribution Channel: The Relationship between Intellectual Property and European Law in Search of Clarification. In: Calboli, Irene and Lee, Edward (Eds.): Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 498–517.Google Scholar
Wiebe, Andreas: Europäischer Datenbankschutz nach “William Hill” – Kehrtwende zur Informationsfreiheit?, Computer und Recht, Vol. 3/2005, pp. 169–174.Google Scholar
Wiebe, Andreas: The Principle of Exhaustion in European Copyright Law and the Distinction between Digital Goods and Digital Services, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 2/2009, pp. 114–118.Google Scholar
Winghardt, Stefan: Gemeinschaftsrechtliches Diskriminierungsverbot und Inländerbehandlungsgrundsatz unter dem Blickwinkel der kollektiven Wahrnehmung urheberrechtlicher Ansprüche, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 12/2001, pp. 993–1011.Google Scholar
Witzel, Michaela: Remarks to EU: Exhaustion of Distribution Right for Software Copy, Computer Law Review International, Vol. 4/2012, pp. 121–123.Google Scholar
Wolff, Lutz-Christian: Artificial Intelligence ante portas: The End of Comparative Law?, The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 3/2019, pp. 484–504.Google Scholar
Won, Alice J.: Exhausted? Video Game Companies and the Battle against Allowing the Resale of Software Licenses, Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, Vol. 1/2013, pp. 386–438.Google Scholar
Woods, Tanya: Copyright Enforcement at All Costs? Finding a Place for Balance in the International Enforcement Agenda, AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Summer 2009, pp. 347–393.Google Scholar
Wright, Aaron, and De Filippi, Primavera: Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia, March 10, 2015 (https://ssrn.com/%20abstract=2580664).Google Scholar
Wu, Michelle M.: Building a Collaborative Digital Collection: A Necessary Evolution in Libraries, Law Library Journal, Vol. 4/2011, pp. 527–551.Google Scholar
Wu, Michelle M.: Revisiting Controlled Digital Lending Post-ReDigi, First Monday, May 2019 (https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/9644).Google Scholar
Xalabarder, Raquel: The Role of the CJEU in Harmonizing EU Copyright Law, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 6/2016, pp. 635–639.Google Scholar
Yen, Alfred C., and Liu, Joseph P.: Copyright Law – Essential Cases and Materials, 2nd ed., American Casebook Series, West, St. Paul, 2011.Google Scholar
Yu, Peter K.: Anticircumvention and Anti-Anticircumvention, Denver University Law Review, 2006, pp. 13–77.Google Scholar
Yu, Peter K.: The Global Intellectual Property Order and Its Undetermined Future, The WIPO Journal, Vol. 1/2009, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Yu, Peter K.: Region Codes and the Territorial Mess, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 2012, pp. 187–264.Google Scholar
Yu, Peter K.: The Alphabet Soup of Transborder Intellectual Property Enforcement. In: Weckström, Katja (Ed.): Governing Innovation and Expression: New Regimes, Strategies and Techniques, Private Law Series A:132, University of Turku Faculty of Law, Turku, 2013, pp. 239–257.Google Scholar
Yu, Peter K.: How Copyright Law May Affect Pop Music without Our Knowing It, UMKC Law Review, 2014a, pp. 363–401.Google Scholar
Yu, Peter K.: TPP and Trans-Pacific Perplexities, Fordham International Law Journal, May 2014b, pp. 1129–1181.Google Scholar
Yu, Peter K.: What Apple’s New Music Streaming Service Will Mean for Underpaid Songwriters, The Conversation, June 17, 2015 (http://theconversation.com/what-apples-new-music-streaming-service-will-mean-for-underpaidsongwriters-42230).Google Scholar
Yu, Peter K.: The Copy in Copyright. In: Lai, Jessica C and Dominicé, Antoinette Maget (Eds.): Intellectual Property and Access to Im/material Goods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016, pp. 65–93.Google Scholar
Zech, Herbert: Vom Buch zur Cloud – Die Verkehrsfähigkeit digitaler Güter, Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 3/2013, pp. 369–396.Google Scholar
Zeilinger, Martin: Digital Art as “Monetised Graphics”: Enforcing Intellectual Property on the Blockchain, Philosophy & Technology, Vol. 1/2018, pp. 15–41Google Scholar
Zweigert, Konrad, and Kötz, Hein: Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung, 3. Auflage, J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen, 1996.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

COM(85) 310 = White Paper from the Commission to the European Council: Completing the Internal Market, COM(85) 310 final, Brussels, June 14, 1985.Google Scholar
COM(96) 568 = Follow-up to the Green Paper on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, 1996, COM(96) 568 final, Brussels, November 20, 1996.Google Scholar
COM(2000) 199 = Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee on the implementation and effects of Directive 91/250/EEC on the legal protection of computer programs, COM(2000) 199 final, Brussels, April 10, 2000.Google Scholar
COM(2011) 635 = Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Common European Sales Law, COM(2011) 635 final, Brussels, November 10, 2011.Google Scholar
COM(2015) 626 = Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Towards a modern, more European copyright framework, COM(2015) 626 final, Brussels, December 9, 2015.Google Scholar
DMCA Section 104 Report (2001) = DMCA Section 104 Report – A Report of the Register of Copyrights Pursuant to §104 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, August 2001 (www.copyright.gov/reports/studies/dmca/sec-104-report-vol-1.pdf).Google Scholar
Entwurf (2012) = Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Ermöglichung der privaten Weiterveräußerung unkörperlicher Werkexemplare, Drucksache 17/8377, January 18, 2012 (www.cr-online.de/20120207_1708377.pdf).Google Scholar
EU Position Paper (2015) = The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) – Towards an EU-US trade deal, Intellectual property, EU Position Paper, March 20, 2015 (http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/html/153331.htm).Google Scholar
Green Paper (1988) = Commission of the European Communities: Green Paper on Copyright and the Challenge of Technology – Copyright Issues Requiring Immediate Action, COM (88) 172 final, Brussels, June 7, 1988.Google Scholar
Green Paper (1995) = Green Paper – Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, Brussels, COM (95) 382 final, Brussels, June 19, 1995.Google Scholar
H.R. Rep (1909) = The House Report 1 on the Copyright Act of 1909, February 1909 (http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/lipa/copyrights/The%20House%20Report%201%20on%20the%20Copyright%20Act%20of%201909.pdf).Google Scholar
H.R. Rep. (1976) = H.R. Rep. No. 94–1476 (1976).Google Scholar
H.R. Rep. (1984) = H.R. Rep. No. 98–987 (1984).Google Scholar
Public Consultation (2014) = Public Consultation on the review of the EU copyright rules, 2014 (http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2013/copyright-rules/docs/consultation-document_en.pdf).Google Scholar
Report to Congress (2001) = Report to Congress: Study Examining 17 U.S.C. Sections 109 and 117 Pursuant to Section 104 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, March 21, 2001 (www.ntia.doc.gov/report/2001/reportcongress-study-examining-17-usc-sections-109-and-117-pursuant-section-104-digital).Google Scholar
SEC (2012) 680 = Orientation Debate on Content in the Digital Economy, SEC (2012) 680, Brussels, November 28, 2012.Google Scholar
S.Rep. (1983) = S. Rep. No. 98–162 (1983).Google Scholar
Pallante Statement (2015) = Statement of Maria A. Pallante, United States Register of Copyrights and Director of the U.S. Copyright Office, Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives, “The Register’s Perspective on Copyright Review,” April 29, 2015 (http://judiciary.house.gov/_cache/files/1c82a3a6–3b1b-4a51-b212–281454d1e56e/written-testimony-of-register-maria-a-pallante.pdf).Google Scholar
UKIPO (2020a) = Intellectual Property after 1 January 2021, UKIPO, October 28, 2020 (www.gov.uk/government/news/intellectual-property-after-1-january-2021)Google Scholar
UKIPO (2020b) = Changes to Copyright Law from 1 January 2021, UKIPO, January 30, 2020 (www.gov.uk/guidance/changes-to-copyright-law-after-the-transition-period).Google Scholar
USCO (1992) = U.S. Copyright Office: Droit de Suite: The Artist’s Resale Royalty, December 1992 (www.copyright.gov/history/droit_de_suite.pdf).Google Scholar
USCO (2013) = U.S. Copyright Office: Resale Royalties: an Updated Analysis, December 2013 (www.copyright.gov/docs/resaleroyalty/usco-resaleroyalty.pdf).Google Scholar
USCO (2016) = U.S. Copyright Office: The Making Available Right in the United States, February 2016 (www.copyright.gov/docs/making_available/making-available-right.pdf).Google Scholar
U.S. Green Paper (1994) = Information Infrastructure Task Force, Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: A Preliminary Draft of the Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights, July 1994.Google Scholar
U.S. White Paper (1995) = Information Infrastructure Task Force, Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: The Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights, September 1995.Google Scholar
U.S. White Paper (2016) = The Department of Commerce – Internet Policy Task Force: White Paper on Remixes, First Sale and Statutory Damages – Copyright Policy, Creativity, and Innovation in the Digital Economy, January 2016 (www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/copyrightwhitepaper.pdf).Google Scholar
A&M Records, Inc., et al. v. Napster, Inc., et al., 239 F.3d 1004 (2001).Google Scholar
Adobe Systems Inc. v. Stargate Software Inc., 216 F.Supp.2d 1051 (2002).Google Scholar
Aftermath Records, et al. v. F.B.T. Records, LLC, et al., 131 S.Ct. 1677 (2011).Google Scholar
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., et al. v. Aereo, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 2498 (2014).Google Scholar
Andrew Paul Leonard v. Stemtech Health Sciences, Inc., et al., 2013 WL 5288266.Google Scholar
Apple Inc., v. Pystar Corporation, 658 F.3d 1150 (2011).Google Scholar
Art & Allposters International BV v. Stichting Pictoright, Case C-419/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:27.Google Scholar
Atlantic Recording Corporation, et al., v. Pamela and Jeffrey Howell, 554 F.Supp.2d 976 (2008).Google Scholar
BASCA v Secretary of State for Innovation and Skills [2015] EWHC 1723 (Admin).Google Scholar
BestWater International GmbH v. Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch, Case C-348/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2315.Google Scholar
BGH 21.11.1958 (I ZR 98/57) – Der Heiligenhof, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 4/1959, pp. 200–204.Google Scholar
BGH 07.11.1980 (I ZR 24/79) – Kabelfernsehen in Abschattungsgebieten, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 4/1981, pp. 413–419.Google Scholar
BGH 06.05.1981 (I ZR 92/78) – Schallplattenexport, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 2/1982, pp. 100–102.Google Scholar
BGH 21.03.1985 (I ZR 166/82) – Schallplattenimport II, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 10/1985, pp. 924–926.Google Scholar
BGH 15.05.1986 (I ZR 22/84) – Videofilmvorführung, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 10/1986, pp. 742–743.Google Scholar
BGH 16.06.1994 (I ZR 24/92) – Folgerecht bei Auslandsbezug, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 11/1994, pp. 798–800.Google Scholar
BGH 22.12.1999 (VIII ZR 299/98) – Ablieferung von Standard-Software, JurPC Web-Dok. 70/2000, Abs. 1–26. (www.jurpc.de/jurpc/show?id=20000070).Google Scholar
BGH 7.6.2001 (I ZR 21/99) – Keine Erschöpfungswirkung bei Vertrieb im Wege des Kaufs auf Probe, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 10–11/2001, pp. 1036–1038.Google Scholar
BGH 15.11.2006 (XII ZR 120/04) – Zur Rechtsnatur der Softwareüberlassung im Rahmen eines ASP-Vertrages, Medien Internet und Recht, Vol. 1/2007, p. 3. (http://medien-internet-und-recht.de/pdf/vt_MIR_Dok_009–2006.pdf).Google Scholar
BGH 11.02.2010 (I ZR 178/08) – Half-Life 2, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 9/2010, pp. 822–824.Google Scholar
BGH 17.07.2013 (I ZR 129/08) – Zulässigkeit des Vertriebs gebrauchter Softwarelizenzen – UsedSoft II., Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 3/2014, pp. 264–272. (Anm. Stieper).Google Scholar
BGH 11.12.2014 (I ZR 8/13) – Erschöpfung des Verbreitungsrechts an Kopien eines Computerprogramms – UsedSoft III, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 8/2015, pp. 772–780. (Anm. Sattler).Google Scholar
BGH 19.3.2015 (I ZR 4/14) – Voraussetzungen zur Zulässigkeit der Weiterveräußerung gebrauchter Software – Green-IT, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 11/2015, pp. 1108–1114.Google Scholar
BGH 9.7.2015 (I ZR 46/12) – Keine öffentliche Wiedergabe durch “Framing” – Die Realität II, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 171–176.Google Scholar
BGH 28.3.2019 (I ZR 132/17) – Öffentliche Wiedergabe bei Bereithalten eines Computerprogramms zum Abruf auf Downloadportal – Testversion, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 9/2019, pp. 950–953.Google Scholar
BMG Music, et al., v. Edmundo Perez, et al., 952 F.2d 318 (1991).Google Scholar
Bobbs-Merrill Company v. Isidor Straus and Nathan Straus, 210 U.S. 339 (1908).Google Scholar
Brilliance Audio, Inc. v. Haights Cross Communications, Inc., 474 F.3d 365 (2007).Google Scholar
Burke & Van Heusen Inc. v. Arrow Drug Inc., et al., 233 F.Supp. 881 (1964).Google Scholar
Capitol Records Inc., et al., v. Jammie Thomas, 579 F.Supp.2d 1210 (2008).Google Scholar
Capitol Records, LLC, v. ReDigi Inc., 934 F.Supp.2d 640 (2013).Google Scholar
Capitol Records, LLC, et al., v. ReDigi, Inc., 2017 WL 2131544.Google Scholar
Capitol Records, LLC, v. ReDigi Inc., 910 F.3d 649 (2018).Google Scholar
Cartoon Network LP, LLLP, et al. v. CSC Holdings, Inc., et al., 536 F.3d 121 (2008).Google Scholar
CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13Google Scholar
Christie Brinkley v. John Casablancas, et al., 438 N.Y.S.2d 1004 (1981).Google Scholar
Centrafarm BV and Adriaan de Peijper v. Sterling Drug Inc., Case 15/74, ECLI:EU:C:1974:114.Google Scholar
Christie’s France SNC v. Syndicat national des antiquaires, Case C-41/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:119.Google Scholar
Chuck Close, et al. v. Sotheby’s, Inc. et al., 894 F.3d 1061 (2018).Google Scholar
Cinéthèque SA and Others v. Fédération nationale des cinémas français, Joined Cases 60/84 and 61/84, ECLI:EU:C:1985:329.Google Scholar
Clemens v. Estes, 22 Fed. Rep. 899 (1885).Google Scholar
Coditel SA, Compagnie générale pour la diffusion de la télévision and Others v. Ciné-Vog Films SA and Others, Case 262/81, ECLI:EU:C:1982:334.Google Scholar
Columbia Broadcasting System Inc. v. Scorpio Music Distributors Inc., 569 F.Supp. 47 (1983).Google Scholar
Columbia Broadcasting System Inc. v. Scorpio Music Distributors Inc., 738 F.2d 424 (1984).Google Scholar
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., et al., v. Aveco, Inc., et al., 800 F.2d 59 (1986).Google Scholar
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., et al., v. Redd Horne, Inc., et al., 749 F.2d 154 (1984).Google Scholar
Cosmair Inc., et al. v. Dynamite Enterprises Inc., et al., 226 U.S.P.Q. 344 (1985).Google Scholar
Costco Wholesale Corp., v. Omega S.A., 559 U.S. 1066 (2010).Google Scholar
Costco Wholesale Corp., v. Omega S.A., 131 S.Ct. 565 (2010).Google Scholar
Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v. Tom Kabinet, 200 154 572/01 SKG NL:GHAMS: 2015:66, January 20, 2015, Computer Law Review International, Vol. 2/2015, pp. 47–50.Google Scholar
Criminal proceedings against Titus Alexander Jochen Donner, Case C-5/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:370.Google Scholar
Denbicare U.S.A., Inc., et al., v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., 84 F.3d 1143 (1996).Google Scholar
Denbicare U.S.A., Inc. v. Toys “R” Us, Inc. 519 U.S. 873 (1996).Google Scholar
Design Options, Inc., v. Bellepointe, Inc., 940 F.Supp. 86 (1996).Google Scholar
Deutsche Grammophon Gesellschaft mbH v. Metro-SB-Großmärkte GmbH & Co. KG, Case 78/70, ECLI:EU:C:1971:59.Google Scholar
Deutsche Grammophon Geselschaft mbH v. Metro-SB-Großmärkte GmbH & Co. KG (3 U 108/1970), Hanseatische OLG, October 28, 1971.Google Scholar
Dimensione Direct Sales srl and Michele Labianca v. Knoll International Spa, Case C-516/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:315.Google Scholar
Disney Enterprises, Inc., et al., v. Redbox Automated Retail, LLC, 336 F.Supp.3d 1146 (2018).Google Scholar
Disney Enterprises, Inc., et al., v. VidAngel, Inc., 2016 WL 8292206 (2016).Google Scholar
Disney Enterprises, Inc., v. VidAngel, Inc., 869 F.3d 848 (2017).Google Scholar
District Court of Amsterdam, Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v Tom Kabinet, C/13/567567/KG ZA 14–795 SP/MV, July 21, 2014.Google Scholar
District Court Mid-Nederlands, CWS v. Vendorlink, ECLI:NL: RBMNE:2015:1096, 25.03.2015, Computer Law Review International, Vol. 2/2016, pp. 60–62.Google Scholar
Dutch Supreme Court, Beeldbrigade, ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BV1301, 27.04.2012, Computerrecht, Vol. 2/2012, pp. 339–353.Google Scholar
Edmundo Perez v. BMG Music, et al., 505 U.S. 1206 (1992).Google Scholar
Elisa Allison, et al., v. Vintage Sports Plaques, et al., 136 F.3d 1443 (1998).Google Scholar
EMI Electrola GmbH v. Patricia Im- und Export and Others, Case C-341/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:30.Google Scholar
Entertainment Software Association v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 34, [2012] 2 R.C.S. 231.Google Scholar
Estate of Robert Graham, et al., v. Sotheby’s, Inc., 860 F.Supp.2d 1117 (2012).Google Scholar
Estate of Robert Graham, et al., v. Sotheby’s, Inc., 178 F.Supp.3d 974 (2016).Google Scholar
Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v. Commission of the European Economic Community, Joined Cases 56 and 58/64, ECLI:EU:C:1966:41.Google Scholar
Euro-Excellence Inc. v. Kraft Canada Inc., [2007] 3 S.C.R. 20, 2007 S.C.C. 37.Google Scholar
European Commission v France, Case C-479/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:141.Google Scholar
F.B.T. Records, LLC, et al. v. Aftermath Records, et al., No. CV 07–3314 PSG (MANx), 2009 WL 137021.Google Scholar
F.B.T. Records, LLC, et al. v. Aftermath Records, et al., 621 F.3d 958 (2010).Google Scholar
Flava Works, Inc., v. Marques Rondale Gunter, et al., 689 F.3d 754 (2012).Google Scholar
Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v. QC Leisure and Others, Joined Cases C-403/08. and C-429/08, ECLI:EU:C:2011:631.Google Scholar
Fundación Gala-Salvador Dalí and Visual Entidad de Gestión de Artistas Plásticos (VEGAP) v. Société des auteurs dans les arts graphiques et plastiques (ADAGP) and Others, Case C-518/08, ECLI:EU:C:2010:191.Google Scholar
Ganghua Liu v. Pearson Education, Inc., et al., 133 S.Ct. 1630 (2013).Google Scholar
G. Basset v. Société des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs de musique (SACEM), Case 402/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:197.Google Scholar
Genesis Publications, Inc., et al., v. Anne C. Goss, 437 So.2d 169 (1983), cert. denied, 449 So.2d 264 (1984).Google Scholar
Geophysical Service, Inc., v. TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company, 850 F.3d 785 (2017).Google Scholar
Geophysical Service, Inc., v. TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company, 2017 WL 5598593 (2017).Google Scholar
Geophysical Service, Inc., v. TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company, 2018 WL 3032575 (2018).Google Scholar
Geophysical Service, Inc., v. TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company, 784 Fed.Appx. 253 (2019).Google Scholar
Geophysical Service, Inc., v. TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company, 140 S.Ct. 2802 (2020).Google Scholar
Harrison v. Maynard, Merrill & Co., 61 Fed. Rep. 689 (1894).Google Scholar
Hearst Corporation, et al., v. J. Ben Stark, et al., 639 F.Supp. 970 (1986).Google Scholar
Henry Bill Publishing Co. v. Smythe, 27 Fed. Rep. 914 (1886).Google Scholar
Herbert S. Zim v. Western Publishing Company, 573 F.2d 1318 (1978).Google Scholar
Independent News Co., Inc., et al., v. Harry Williams, 293 F.2d 510 (1951).Google Scholar
Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades Forening, Case C-5/08, ECLI:EU:C:2009:465.Google Scholar
ITV Broadcasting Ltd and Others v TV Catch Up Ltd., Case C-607/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:147.Google Scholar
Johan Deckmyn and Others v Helena Vandersteen and Others, Case C-201/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2132.Google Scholar
John Hampton, et al. v. Paramount Pictures Corporation, et al., 279 F.2d 100 (1960) cert. denied 364 U.S. 882 (1960).Google Scholar
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Supap Kirtsaeng, et al., 2009 WL 3364037 (S.D.N.Y., 2009).Google Scholar
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng, 654 F.3d 210 (2011).Google Scholar
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Supap Kirtsaeng, 713 F.3d 1142 (2013).Google Scholar
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Supap Kirtsaeng, 2013 WL 6722887 (S.D.N.Y., 2013).Google Scholar
KG 26.1.2001 (5 U 4102/99) – Erschöpfung des Urheberrechts an Dias – Gruß aus Potsdam, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Rechtssprechungs-Report, Vol. 4/2002, pp. 125–126.Google Scholar
K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., 108 S.Ct. 1811 (1988).Google Scholar
Kraft Canada Inc. v. Euro-Excellence Inc., 2007 SCC 37.Google Scholar
Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v. Dirk Renckhoff, Case C-161/17, ECLI:EU:C:2018:634.Google Scholar
Lantern Press Inc. v. American Publishers Co., 419 F.Supp. 1267 (1976).Google Scholar
L’anza Research International v. Quality King Distributors, Inc., 1995 WL 908331 (C.D. Cal.).Google Scholar
L’anza Research International v. Quality King Distributors, Inc., 98 F.3d 1109 (1996).Google Scholar
Laserdisken ApS v. Kulturministeriet, Case C-479/04, ECLI:EU:C: 2006:549.Google Scholar
LG Bielefeld 05.03.2013 (4 O 191/11) – Einschränkung der Rechte beim Erwerb urheberrechtlich geschützter Werke über das Internet, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 8/2013, pp. 688–694.Google Scholar
LG München I. 19.01.2006 (7 O 23237/05) – Online-Erwerb von Software/Erschöpfungsgrundsatz Urheberrecht (Deutschland), Medien und Recht International, Vol. 4/2006, pp. 201–204.Google Scholar
LG München I. 15.03.2007 (7 O 7061/06) – Handel mit “gebrauchten” Softwarelizenzen, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 5/2007, pp. 409–417.Google Scholar
London-Sire Records, Inc. v. John Doe 1, 542 F.Supp.2d 153 (2008).Google Scholar
MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc., 991 F.2d 511 (1993).Google Scholar
Marc Soulier and Sara Doke v. Premier ministre and Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication, Case C-301/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:878.Google Scholar
Martin Blomqvist v. Rolex SA and Manufacture des Montres Rolex SA, Case C-98/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:55.Google Scholar
Mazer, et al. v. Stein, et al., 347 U.S. 201 (1954).Google Scholar
Merck & Co. Inc. v. Stephar BV and Petrus Stephanus Exler, Case 187/80, ECLI:EU:C:1981:180,Google Scholar
Metronome Musik GmbH v. Music Point Hokamp GmbH, Case C-200/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:172.Google Scholar
Microsoft Corp. v. Software Wholesale Club, Inc., 129 F.Supp.2d 995 (2000).Google Scholar
Mirage Editions, Inc., et al., v. Albuquerque A.R.T. Co., 856 F.2d 1341 (1988).Google Scholar
M Kramer MfG. Co. v. Andrews, 783 F.2d 421 (1986).Google Scholar
Morseburg v. Balyon, 621 F.3d 972 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 983 (1980).Google Scholar
Motown Record Co., LP, et al., v. Theresa DePietro, 2007 WL 576284 (E.D.Pa.).Google Scholar
Musik-Vertrieb membran GmbH and K-tel International v. GEMA – Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte, Joined Cases 55 and 57/80, ECLI:EU:C:1981:10.Google Scholar
Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v. Tom Kabinet Internet BV and Others, Case C-263/18, Judgment, EU:C:2019:1111.Google Scholar
Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v. Tom Kabinet Internet BV and Others, Case C-263/18, Opinion, EU:C:2019:697.Google Scholar
Neutrogena Corporation v. U.S., Secretary of the Treasury, 7 U.S.P.Q.2d 1900 (1988).Google Scholar
Nils Svensson and Others v. Retriever Sverige AB, Case C-466/12, ECLI: EU:C:2014:76.Google Scholar
Nintendo of America, Inc., v. Elcon Industries, Inc., et al., 564 F.Supp. 937 (1992).Google Scholar
Nintendo Co. Ltd and Others v. PC Box and Others, Case C-355/12, ECLI: EU:C:2014:25.Google Scholar
OGH 23.05.2000 4 Ob 30/00s, Medien und Recht, Vol. 4/2000, pp. 249–253. (Anm. Walter).Google Scholar
OLG Düsseldorf 29.06.2009 (20 U 247/08) – Zweck des Erschöpfungsgrundsatzes, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Rechtssprechungs-Report, Vol. 1/2009, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
OLG Frankfurt am Main 12.05.2009 (11 W 15/09) – Handel mit Software-Echtheitszertifikaten und Product-Keys, Medien Internet und Recht, Vol. 6/2009, pp. 1–4 (http://medien-internet-und-recht.de/pdf/VT_MIR_2009_131.pdf).Google Scholar
OLG Frankfurt am Main 18.12.2012 (11 U 68/11) – Erschöpfung des Verbreitungsrechts on online übermittelter Software – Adobe/UsedSoft, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 3/2013, pp. 279–285.Google Scholar
OLG Frankfurt am Main 22.12.2016 (11 U 108/13) – Keine Erschöpfung durch Herunterladen einer Testversion, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 6/2017, pp. 512–517.Google Scholar
OLG Hamburg 04.12.2014 (10 U 5/11) – Keine Erschöpfung bei Online-Diensten – eBook-AGB, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht – Rechtssprechungs-Report, Vol. 9/2015, pp. 361–365.Google Scholar
OLG Hamm 15.05.2014 (22 U 60/13) – Keine Erschöpfung bei Audiodateien – Hörbuch-AGB, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Vol. 9/2014, pp. 853–863.Google Scholar
OLG München 03.07.2008 (6 U 2759/07) – Handel mit “gebrauchten” Softwarelizenzen, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht, Vol. 1/2009, pp. 70–74 (Anm. Herzog).Google Scholar
OLG Stuttgart 03.11.2011 (2 U 49/11) – Keine Erschöpfung bei Online-Vertrieb von Hörbüchern, Computer und Recht, Vol. 5/2012, pp. 301–302 (Anm. Schmidt).Google Scholar
Omega S.A., et al., v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 2007 WL 7029734 (C.D.Cal., 2007).Google Scholar
Omega S.A., et al., v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 541 F.3d 982 (2008).Google Scholar
Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 2011 WL 8492716 (C.D.Cal., 2011). Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 776 F.3d 692 (2015).Google Scholar
Opinion 3/15 of the Court, ECLI:EU:C:2017:114.Google Scholar
Opinion, Axel W. Bierbach, administrator of UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp., Case C-128/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:234.Google Scholar
Opinion, Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v. QC Leisure and Others, Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08, ECLI:EU:C:2011:43.Google Scholar
Opinion, Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v. Tom Kabinet Internet BV and Others, Case C-263/18, EU:C:2019:697.Google Scholar
Opinion, Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v. Stichting Leenrecht, Case C-174/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:459.Google Scholar
Opinion, VG Bild-Kunst v. Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Case C-392/19, ECLI:EU:C:2020:696.Google Scholar
Paramount Home Entertainment v. British Sky Broadcasting [2014] EWHC 937 (Ch).Google Scholar
Parfums Christian Dior SA and Parfums Christian Dior BV v. Evora BV, Case C-337/95, ECLI:EU:C:1997:517.Google Scholar
Parfums Givenchy, Inc. v. Drug Emporium, Inc., 38 F.3d 477 (1994).Google Scholar
Parfums Givenchy, Inc. v. Drug Emporium, Inc., 514 U.S. 1004 (1995).Google Scholar
Paul Edmond Dowling v. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985).Google Scholar
Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Ganghua Liu, et al., 656 F.Supp.2d 407 (2009).Google Scholar
Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Ganghua Liu, et al., 10–894-mv (Second Circuit, 2011; unpublished).Google Scholar
Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Mohit Arora, et al., 717 F.Supp.2d 374 (2010).Google Scholar
Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Mohit Arora, et al., 438 Fed.Appx. 34 (2011).Google Scholar
Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Vinod Kumar, et al., 721 F.Supp.2d 166 (2010).Google Scholar
Pearson Education, Inc., et al., v. Vinod Kumar, et al., 452 Fed.Appx. 11 (2011).Google Scholar
Peek & Cloppenburg KG v. Cassina SpA, Case C-456/06, ECLI:EU:C: 2008:232.Google Scholar
Pelham GmbH and Others v. Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider-Esleben, Case C-476/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:624.Google Scholar
Phil Collins v. Imtrat Handelsgesellschaft mbH and Patricia Im- und Export Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH and Leif Emanuel Kraul v. EMI Electrola GmbH, Joined Cases 92/92 and 326/92, ECLI:EU:C:1993:847.Google Scholar
Platt & Munck Co., Inc. v. Republic Graphics Inc., et al., 315 F.2d 847 (1963).Google Scholar
Polydor Limited and RSO Records Inc. v. Harlequin Records Shops Limited and Simons Records Limited, Case C-270/80, ECLI:EU:C:1982:43.Google Scholar
ProCD, Inc., v. Matthew Zeidenberg, et al., 86 F.3d 1447 (1996).Google Scholar
Procureur du Roi v. Benoît and Gustave Dassonville, Case C-8/74, ECLI:EU:C:1974:82.Google Scholar
Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L’anza Research International, Inc., 523 U.S. 135 (1998).Google Scholar
Recording Industry Association of America v. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc., 180 F.3d 1072 (1999).Google Scholar
Red Baron-Franklin Park Inc., et al., v. Taito Corp., et al., 883 F.2d 275 (1989).Google Scholar
Red Baron-Franklin Park, Inc. v. Taito Corp. 493 U.S. 1058 (1990).Google Scholar
Redbox Automated Retail, LLC, v. Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Inc., et al., 399 F.Supp.3d 1018 (2019).Google Scholar
ReDigi Inc., et al., v. Capitol Records, LLC, et al., 139 St.C. 2760 (2019).Google Scholar
RG 26.03.1902 (Rep. I. 303/01) – Guajakol-Karbonat, 51 RGZ 139.Google Scholar
RG 10.06.1906 (Rep. I. 5/06) – Königs Kursbuch, 63 RGZ 394.Google Scholar
RG 10.06.1906, 39 RGSt 108.Google Scholar
Rogers Communications Inc. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2012 SCC 35, [2012]2 R.C.S. 283.Google Scholar
SA Compagnie générale pour la diffusion de la télévision, Coditel and Others v. Ciné Vog Films and Others, Case 62/79, ECLI:EU:C:1980:84.Google Scholar
Sam Francis Foundation, et al., v. Christie’s, Inc., 784 F.3d 1320 (2015).Google Scholar
Sam Francis Foundation, et al., v. Christie’s, Inc., 2015 WL 4429309.Google Scholar
Sam Francis Foundation, et al., v. Christie’s, Inc., 136 S.Ct. 795 (2016).Google Scholar
Scarves by Vera Inc. v. American Handbags Inc., 188 F.Supp. 255 (1960).Google Scholar
Schweizerisches Bundesgericht 1.3.2007 (4C.384/2006) – Enter the Matrix, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht Internationaler Teil, Vol. 1/2008, pp. 70–72.Google Scholar
Sebastian International Inc. v. Consumer Contacts (PTY) Ltd., et al., 664 F.Supp. 909 (1987).Google Scholar
Sebastian International Inc. v. Consumer Contacts (PTY) Ltd., et al., 847 F.2d 1093 (1987).Google Scholar
SoftMan Products Co. v. Adobe Sys. Inc., 171 F.Supp.2d 1075 (2001).Google Scholar
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al., v. Joel Tenenbaum, 660 F.3d 487 (2011).Google Scholar
Sony Corporation of America, et al. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., et al., 464 U.S. 417 (1984).Google Scholar
Spiegel Online GmbH v. Volker Beck, Case C-516/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:625.Google Scholar
Staatlich genehmigte Gesellschaft der Autoren, Komponisten und Musikverleger registrierte Genossenschaft mbH (AKM) v Zürs.net Betriebs GmbH, Case C-138/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:218.Google Scholar
Stern v. Lavender, 319 F.Supp.3d 650 (2018).Google Scholar
Stowe v. Thomas, 23 F.Cas. 201 (1853).Google Scholar
Supap Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S.Ct. 1351 (2013).Google Scholar
T.B. Harms Company v. Jem Records, Inc., 655 F.Supp. 1575 (1987).Google Scholar
Technische Universität Darmstadt v. Eugen Ulmer KG, Case C-117/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2196.Google Scholar
The British Horseracing Board Ltd and Others v. William Hill Organization Ltd., Case C-203/02, ECLI:EU:C:2004:695.Google Scholar
The C. M. Paula Company v. L. Gene Logan, 355 F.Supp. 189 (1973).Google Scholar
The Sam Francis Foundation, et al., v. eBay Inc., 2012 WL 12294395.Google Scholar
The Queen v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Compassion in World Farming Ltd., Case C-1/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:113.Google Scholar
Théberge v. Galerie d’Art du Petit Champlain Inc., et al., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 336, 2002 SCC 34.Google Scholar
Timothy S. Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc., 555 F.Supp.2d 1164 (2008).Google Scholar
Timothy S. Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc., 621 F.3d 1102 (2010).Google Scholar
Timothy S. Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc., 132 S.Ct. 105 (2011).Google Scholar
Triad Systems Corp. v. Souteastern Express Company, 64 F.3d 1330 (1995).Google Scholar
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Troy Augusto, 628 F.3d 1175 (2011).Google Scholar
United States v. Belmont et al., 715 F.2d 459 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1022 (1984).Google Scholar
United States v. Goss, 803 F.2d 638 (1986).Google Scholar
United States v. Raymond Joseph Atherton, 561 F.2d 747 (1977).Google Scholar
United States v. Wise, 550 F.2d 1180 (1977).Google Scholar
Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, et al., v. Clint Bigwood, 441 F.Supp.2d 185 (2006).Google Scholar
UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v. Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and Others, Case C-314/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:192.Google Scholar
UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp., Case C-128/11, ECLI:EU:C: 2012:407.Google Scholar
Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v. Stichting Leenrecht, Case C-174/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:856.Google Scholar
Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort (VG Wort) v. Kyocera and Others, Joined Cases C-457/11 to C-460/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:426.Google Scholar
VG Bild-Kunst v. Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Case C-392/19, ECLI:EU:C:2021:181.Google Scholar
VidAngel, Inc. v. Sullivan Entertainment Group, Inc., et al., 2018 WL 3611068 (2018).Google Scholar
Vinod Kumar, et al., v. Pearson Education, Inc., et al., 133 S.Ct. 1631 (2013).Google Scholar
Wall Data, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, 447 F.3d 769 (2006).Google Scholar
Walt Disney Productions v. John Basmajian and Christie, Manson & Woods International, Inc., 600 F.Supp. 439 (1984).Google Scholar
Warner Brothers Inc. and Metronome Video ApS v. Erik Viuff Christiansen, Case 158/86, ECLI:EU:C:1988:242.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Péter Mezei
  • Book: Copyright Exhaustion
  • Online publication: 17 February 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914918.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Péter Mezei
  • Book: Copyright Exhaustion
  • Online publication: 17 February 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914918.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Péter Mezei
  • Book: Copyright Exhaustion
  • Online publication: 17 February 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914918.007
Available formats
×