Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:03:33.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2022

Tomoko Ishikawa
Tomoko Ishikawa
Affiliation:
Nagoya University, Japan
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Corporate Environmental Responsibility in Investor-State Dispute Settlement
The Unexhausted Potential of Current Mechanisms
 , pp. 247 - 299
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadie, Pauline. ‘A New Story of David and Goliath: The Alien Tort Claims Act Gives Victims of Environmental Injustice in the Developing World a Viable Claim against Multinational Corporations’ (2004) 34(3) Golden Gate Law Review 745–796.Google Scholar
Abel, Patrick. ‘Counterclaims Based on International Human Rights Obligations of Investors in International Investment Arbitration: Fallacies and Potentials of the 2016 ICSID Urbaser v. Argentina Award’ (2018) 1 Brill Open Law 61–90.Google Scholar
Abramchayev, Liliya. ‘A Social Contract Argument for the State’s Duty to Protect from Private Violence’ (2004) 18(3) Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development 849–874.Google Scholar
Addo, Michael K. ‘Human Rights and Transnational Corporations: An Introduction’, in Addo, Michael K. (ed.), Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999), 3–37.Google Scholar
Adeola, Francis O. ‘Environmental Injustice and Human Rights Abuse: The States, MNCs, and Repression of Minority Groups in the World System’ (2001) 8(1) Human Ecology 39–59.Google Scholar
Adeyeye, Adefolake. ‘Corporate Responsibility in International Law: Which Way to Go?’ (2007) 11 Singapore Year Book of International Law 141–161.Google Scholar
Aftab, Yousuf. ‘The Intersection of Law and Corporate Social Responsibility: Human Rights Strategy and Litigation Readiness for Extractive-Sector Companies’, 60th Annual Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute (2014), 1–30.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Farrah and Perry, Adam. ‘The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations’ (2014) 73(1) Cambridge Law Journal 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexis, Gwendolyn Yvonne. ‘Global Sullivan Principles’, in Cohen, Nevin and Robbins, Paul (eds.), Green Business: An A-to-Z Guide (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2011), 279–281.Google Scholar
Al Faruque, Abdullah. ‘Mapping the Relationship between Investment Protection and Human Rights’ (2010) 11(4) Journal of World Investment & Trade 539–560.Google Scholar
Alford, Roger P. ‘The Future of Human Rights Litigation after Kiobel’ (2014) 89(4) Notre Dame Law Review 1749–1772.Google Scholar
Alford, Roger P. ‘Human Rights after Kiobel: Choice of Law and the Rise of Transnational Tort Litigation’ (2014) 63(5) Emory Law Journal 1089–1162.Google Scholar
Ali, Shahla F. and Repousis, Odysseas G. ‘Investor–State Mediation and the Rise of Transparency in International Investment Law: Opportunity or Threat?’ (2018) 45(2) Denver Journal of International Law 225–249.Google Scholar
Allen, John C. ‘Training Environmental Mediators: A Community-Based Approach’, in Walton Blackburn, J. and Bruce, Willa Marie (eds.), Mediating Environmental Conflicts: Theory and Practice (Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 1995), 49–59.Google Scholar
Alschner, Wolfgang and Skougarevskiy, Dmitriy. ‘Convergence and Divergence in the Investment Treaty Universe: Scoping the Potential for Multilateral Consolidation’ (2017) 8(2) Trade, Law, and Development 152–183.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E. ‘Are Corporations “Subjects” of International Law?’ (2011) 9(1) Santa Clara Journal of International Law 1–36.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E. ‘Is Investor–State Arbitration “Public”?’ (2016) 7(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 534–576.Google Scholar
Amado, Jose Daniel, Kern, Jackson Shaw and Rodriguez, Martin Doe. Arbitrating the Conduct of International Investors (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), Chapters 1, 2, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amel-Zadeh, Amir and Serafeim, George. ‘Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey’ (2018) 74(3) Financial Analyst Journal 87–103.Google Scholar
American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law, Third, Torts: Liability for Physical and Emotional Harm (St. Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers, 2010).Google Scholar
Amianto, Lodovico. ‘The Role of “Unclean Hands” Defences in International Investment Law’ (2019–2020) 6(1) McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution 1–37.Google Scholar
Ancelin, Julien. ‘À-propos de la “théorie des mains propres”: Observations sur les sentences arbitrales Yukos de la Cour Permanente d’Arbitrage du 18 juillet 2014’ (2015) LXI Annuaire Français de droit international 831–856.Google Scholar
Anderson, Michael R. ‘Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection: An Overview’, in Boyle, Alan and Anderson, Michael R. (eds.), Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), 71–87.Google Scholar
Anderson, Michael R. ‘Transnational Corporations and Environmental Damage: Is Tort Law the Answer?’ (2002) 41(3) Washburn Law Journal 399–426.Google Scholar
Andreoni, James and Levinson, Anik. ‘The Simple Analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve’ (2001) 80(2) Journal of Public Economics 269–286.Google Scholar
Andrews, Neil. Contract Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), Part II.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anning, Molly. ‘Counterclaims Admissibility in Investment Arbitration: The Case of Environmental Disputes’, in Chaisse, Julien, Choukroune, Leïla and Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Singapore: Springer, 2019), 1277–1325.Google Scholar
Anton, Donald K. and Shelton, Dinah L. Environmental Protection and Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), Chapter 1.Google Scholar
Antonopoulos, Constantine. Counterclaims before the International Court of Justice (Berlin: Springer, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzilotti, Dionisio. ‘La demande reconventionnelle en procédure internationale’ (1930) 57(4) Journal du Droit International 857–877.Google Scholar
Arcuri, Alessandra and Montanaro, Francesco. ‘Justice for All? Protecting the Public Interest in Investment Treaties’ (2018) 59(8) Boston College Law Review 2791–2824.Google Scholar
Arcuri, Alessandra and Violi, Federica. ‘Human Rights and Investor–State Dispute Settlement: Changing (Almost) Everything, So That Everything Stays the Same?’ (2019) 3 Diritti umani e diritto internazionale 579–596.Google Scholar
Arcuri, Alessandra, Montanaro, Francesco and Violi, Federica. ‘Proposal for a Human Rights – Compatible International Investment Agreement: Arbitration for All’, OHCHR, 2018.Google Scholar
Aristova, Ekaterina. ‘Tort Litigation against Transnational Corporations in the English Courts: The Challenge of Jurisdiction’ (2018) 14(2) Utrecht Law Review 1–21.Google Scholar
Ascensio, Hervé. ‘Les activités normatives des entreprises multinationals’, in Dubin, Laurence, Bodeau-Livinec, Pierre, Iten, Jean-Louis and Tomkiewicz, Vincent (eds.), L’entreprise multinationale et le droit international (Paris: Pedone, 2017), 265–278.Google Scholar
Atanasova, Dafina, Martínez Benoit, Carlos Adrián and Ostřanský, Josef. ‘Counterclaims in Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) under International Investment Agreements (IIAs)’ (2012) Trade and Investment Law Clinic Papers 1–60.Google Scholar
Augenstein, Daniel. ‘Torture as Tort? Transnational Tort Litigation for Corporate-Related Human Rights Violations and the Human Right to a Remedy’ (2018) 18(3) Human Rights Law Review 593–612.Google Scholar
Augenstein, Daniel and Kinley, David. ‘Beyond the 100 Acre Wood: In Which International Human Rights Law Finds New Ways to Tame Global Corporate Power’ (2015) 19(6) International Journal of Human Rights 828–848.Google Scholar
Baade, Björnstjern. ‘Due Diligence and the Duty to Protect Human Rights’, in Krieger, Heike, Peters, Anne and Kreuzer, Leonhard (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 92–109.Google Scholar
Baba, Sofiane and Raufflet, Emmanuel. ‘L’acceptabilité sociale: une notion en consolidation’ (2015) 19(3) Management International/International Management/Gestiòn Internacional 98–114.Google Scholar
Backer, Larry Catá. ‘On the Evolution of the United Nations’ “Protect-Respect-Remedy” Project: The State, the Corporation and Human Rights in a Global Governance Context’ (2010) 9(1) Santa Clara Journal of International Law 37–80.Google Scholar
Baetens, Freya. ‘Procedural Issues Relating to Shared Responsibility in Arbitral Proceedings’ (2013) 4(2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 319–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baez, Cristina, Dearing, Michele, Delatour, Margaret and Dixon, Christine. ‘Multinational Enterprises and Human Rights’ (2000) 8(1) University of Miami International & Comparative Law Review 183–338.Google Scholar
Baiashvili, Tamar and Gattini, Luca. ‘Impact of FDI on Economic Growth: The Role of Country Income Levels and Institutional Strength’ (2020) EIB Working Paper 2020/02.Google Scholar
Balcerzak, Filip. Investor-State Arbitration and Human Rights (Leiden: Brill NIjhoff, 2017), Chapters 2, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltag, Crina. ‘Reforming the ISDS System: In Search of a Balanced Approach’ (2019) 12(2) Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 279–312.Google Scholar
Baltag, Crina. ‘The Role of Amici Curiae in Light of Recent Developments in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Legitimizing the System?’ (2020) 35(1–2) ICSID Review 279–310.Google Scholar
Baltag, Crina and Dautaj, Ylli. ‘Investors, States, and Arbitrators in the Crosshairs of International Investment Law and Environmental Protection’ (2019) 3(1) International Investment Law and Arbitration 1–77.Google Scholar
Banifatemi, Yas. ‘The Law Applicable in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in Yannaca-Small, Katia (ed.), Arbitration under International Investment Agreements (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 191–210.Google Scholar
Bantekas, Ilias. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in International Law’ (2004) 22(2) Boston University International Law Journal 309–348.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. ‘A Functional Approach to “General Principles of International Law”’ (1990) 11(3) Michigan Journal of International Law 768–818.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. ‘Geographies of Injustice: Human Rights at the Alter of Convenience’, in Scott, Craig Martin (ed.), Torture as Tort: Comparative Perspectives on the Development of Transnational Human Rights Litigation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), 197–212.Google Scholar
Beckers, Anna. Enforcing Corporate Social Responsibility Codes: On Global Self-Regulation and National Private Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015), Chapters 3, 4.Google Scholar
Beckers, Anna. ‘Regulating Corporate Regulators through Contract Law? The Case of Corporate Social Responsibility Codes of Conduct’ (2016) MWP 2016/12 Max Weber Programme, available at: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/41485/MWP_2016_12.pdf?sequence=4.Google Scholar
Bederman, David J. ‘Contributory Fault and State Responsibility’ (1990) 30(2) Vanderbilt Journal of International Law 335–370.Google Scholar
Beharry, Christina L. and Kuritzky, Melinda E. ‘Going Green: Managing the Environment through International Investment Arbitration’ (2015) 30(3) American University International Law Review 383–429.Google Scholar
Bellia, Anthony J. and Clark, Bradford R. ‘The Alien Tort Statute and the Law of Nations’ (2011) 78(2) University of Chicago Law Review 445–552.Google Scholar
Ben Hamida, Walid. ‘L’arbitrage Etat-investisseur cherche son équilibre perdu: Dans quelle mersure l’Etat peut introduire des demandes reconventionnelles contre l’investisseur privé?’ (2005) 7(4) International Law FORUM du droit international 261–272.Google Scholar
Bennouna, Mohamed. ‘Experts before the International Court of Justice: What for?’ (2018) 9(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 345–351.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha. La due diligence en droit international (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2021), Chapitre IV.Google Scholar
Beuscher, J. H. ‘The Use of Experts by the Courts’ (1941) 54(7) Harvard Law Review 1105–1127.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Kinnari and Türkelli, Erdem, Gamze. ‘OECD National Contact Points as Sites of Effective Remedy: New Expressions of the Role and Rule of Law within Market Globalization?’ (2021) 6(3) Business and Human Rights Journal 423–448.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, ‘ David. ‘Introduction: Putting Flesh on the Bone – What Should a Business and Human Rights Treaty Look Like?’, in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds.), Building a Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Context and Contours (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 1–24.Google Scholar
Binder, Christina and Hofbauer, Jane A. ‘Case Study: Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador/Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku v Ecuador’ (2016) Committee on the Implementation of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples of the International Law Association, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2810062.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, Andrea K. ‘The Role of Counterclaims in Rebalancing Investment Law’ (2013) 17(2) Lewis & Clark Law Review 461–480.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, Andrea K. and Vanhonnaeker, Lukas. ‘Article 42’, in Fouret, Julien, Gerbay, Rémy and Alvarez, Gloria M. (eds.), The ICSID Convention, Regulations and Rules: A Practical Commentary (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2019), 347–369.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, Andrea K. and Vanhonnaeker, Lukas. ‘Yukos: The Clean Hands Doctrine Revisited’ (2015) 9(2) Diritti umani e diritto internazionale 365–385.Google Scholar
Blackaby, Nigel and Wilbraham, Alex. ‘Practical Issues Relating to the Use of Expert Evidence in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2016) 31(3) ICSID Review 655–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, J. Walton. ‘Environmental Mediation Theory and Practice: Challenges, Issues, and Needed Research and Theory Development’, in Walton Blackburn, J. and Bruce, Willa Marie (eds.), Mediating Environmental Conflicts: Theory and Practice (Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 1995), 267–279.Google Scholar
Blanton, Shannon Lindsey and Blanton, Robert G. ‘A Sectoral Analysis of Human Rights and FDI: Does Industry Type Matter?’ (2009) 53(2) International Studies Quarterly 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blowfield, Michael and Murray, Alan, Corporate Social Responsibility, 4th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), Chapter 2.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel. ‘Legitimacy in International Law and International Relations’, in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 321–342.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel and Crook, John R. ‘Introduction and Overview’ (2002) 96(4) American Journal of International Law 773–791.Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. ‘Environmental Protection and Investment Arbitration: Yin and Yang?’ (2017) 10 Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional, Bogotá 371–399.Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. ‘The Principle of Compétence de la Compétence in International Adjudication and Its Role in an Era of Multiplication of Courts and Tribunals’, in Arsanjani, Mahnoush H., Cogan, Jacob Katz, Sloane, Robert D. and Wiessner, Siegfried (eds.), Looking to the Future: Essays in Honor of W. Michael Reisman (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010), 1027–1064.Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, Mbengue, Makane Moise, Das, Rukmini and Gros, Guillaume. ‘One Size does not Fit All – Uses of Experts before International Courts and Tribunals: An Insight into the Practice’ (2018) 9(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 477–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfanti, Angelica. ‘Applying Corporate Social Responsibility to Foreign Investment: Failures and Prospects’, in Treves, Tullio, Seatzu, Francesco and Trevisanut, Seline (eds.), Foreign Investment, International Law and Common Concerns (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014), 230–246.Google Scholar
Bonnitcha, Jonathan. Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), Chapters 4, 5.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin. ‘Protection of Citizens Abroad and Change of Original Nationality’ (1934) 20(4) Yale Law Journal 359–392.Google Scholar
Born, Gary and Forrest, Stephanie. ‘Amicus Curiae Participation in Investment Arbitration’ (2019) 34(3) ICSID Review 626–665.Google Scholar
Boscariol, John W., Taborda, Ashley and Zaccaria, Melina. ‘Mitigating Risk Exposure to Forced Labour in the Supply Chain: Part II – Canada’s Response to Forced Labour’, McCarthy Tétrault, 2 November 2021, available at: www.mccarthy.ca/en/insights/blogs/terms-trade/mitigating-risk-exposure-forced-labour-supply-chain-part-ii-canadas-response-forced-labour#_ftn16.Google Scholar
Bose, Debadatta. ‘David R Aven v Costa Rica: The Confluence of Corporations, Public International Law and International Investment Law’ (2020) 35(1–2) ICSID Review 20–28.Google Scholar
Bottini, Gabriel. ‘Legality of Investments under ICSID Jurisprudence’, in Waibel, Michael, Kaushal, Asha, Chung, Liz Kyo-Hwa and Balchin, Claire (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010), 297–314.Google Scholar
Boutilier, Robert G. ‘Frequently Asked Questions about the Social Licence to Operate’ (2014) 32(4) Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 263–272.Google Scholar
Boutilier, Robert G., Black, Leeora D. and Thomson, Ian. ‘From Metaphor to Management Tool: How the Social License to Operate Can Stabilise the Socio-political Environment for Business’ (2012) International Mine Management 2012 Proceedings 227–237.Google Scholar
Boyle, Alan. ‘Human Rights and the Environment: Where Next?’ (2012) 23(3) European Journal of International Law 613–642.Google Scholar
Boyle, Alan. ‘Human Rights or Environmental Rights? A Reassessment’ (2006) 18(3) Fordham Environmental Law Review 470–511.Google Scholar
Boyle, Alan. ‘Some Reflections on the Relationship of Treaties and Soft Law’ (1999) 48(4) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 901–913.Google Scholar
Bravin, Mark N. and Kaplan, Alex B. ‘Arbitrating Closely Related Counterclaims at ICSID in the Wake of Spyridon Roussalis v. Romania’ (2012) 9(4) Transnational Dispute Management 1–11.Google Scholar
Brierly, James Leslie. The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace, 6th ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963), Chapter VI.Google Scholar
Bronckers, M. ‘Is Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Superior to Litigation before Domestic Courts? An EU View on Bilateral Trade Agreements’ (2015) 18(3) Journal of International Economic Law 655–677.Google Scholar
Brower, Charles N. and Schill, Stephan W. ‘Is Arbitration a Threat or a Boon to the Legitimacy of International Investment Law?’ (2009) 9(2) Chicago Journal of International Law 471–498.Google Scholar
Brown, Chester. ‘The Protection of Legitimate Expectations as a “General Principle of Law”: Some Preliminary Thoughts’ (2009) 6(1) Transnational Dispute Management 1–10.Google Scholar
Brown, Chester and Winch, Phoebe. ‘The Confidentiality and Transparency Debate in Commercial and Investment Mediation’, in Titi, Catharine and Gómez, Katia Fach (eds.), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 321–341.Google Scholar
Bubrowski, Helene. ‘Balancing IIA Arbitration through the Use of Counterclaims’, in de Mestral, Armand and Lévesque, Céline (eds.), Improving International Investment Agreements (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013), 212–246.Google Scholar
Buhmann, Karin. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: What Role for Law? Some Aspects of Law and CSR’ (2006) 6(2) Corporate Governance 188–202.Google Scholar
Buhmann, Karin. ‘Public Regulators and CSR: The “Social Licence to Operate” in Recent United Nations Instruments on Business and Human Rights and the Juridification of CSR’ (2016) 136(4) Journal of Business Ethics 699–714.Google Scholar
Bungenberg, Marc and Reinisch, August. From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court: Options Regarding the Institutionalization of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (Berlin: Springer Open, 2018).Google Scholar
Burda, Julien. ‘Le consentement aux demandes reconventionnelles dans le cadre du CIRDI à la lumière de la sentence Spyridon Roussalis contre Roumanie’ (2003) 3(1) Revue d’arbitrage et de médiation 25–51.Google Scholar
Burke-White, William W. and von Staden, Andreas. ‘The Need for Public Law Standards of Review in Investor-State Arbitrations’, in Schill, Stephan W. (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 689–720.Google Scholar
Burke-White, William W. and von Staden, Andreas. ‘Private Litigation in a Public Law Sphere: The Standard of Review in Investor-State Arbitrations’ (2010) 35(2) Yale Journal of International Law 283–346.Google Scholar
Butler, Lisa F. ‘Parens Patriae Representation in Transnational Crisis: The Bhopal Tragedy’ (1987) 17(1) California Western International Law Journal 175–207.Google Scholar
Buur, Lars, Nystrand, Malin J. and Pedersen, Rasmus Hundsbæk. ‘The Political Economy of Land and Natural Resource Investments in Africa: An Analytical Framework’ (2017) Danish Institute for International Studies Working Paper 2017:2, 1–48.Google Scholar
Calamita, N. Jansen. ‘The Challenge of Establishing a Multilateral Investment Tribunal at ICSID’ (2017) 32(3) ICSID Review 611–624.Google Scholar
Campbell, Christopher. ‘House of Cards: The Relevance of Legitimate Expectations under Fair and Equitable Treatment Provisions in Investment Treaty Law’ (2013) 30(4) Journal of International Arbitration 361–379.Google Scholar
Carballo Leyda, Alejandro. ‘Model Instrument for Management of Investment Disputes’, in Chaisse, Julien, Choukroune, Leïla and Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Singapore: Springer, 2021), 681–707.Google Scholar
Caron, David D. ‘The Nature of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal and the Evolving Structure of International Dispute Resolution’ (1990) 84(1) American Journal International Law 104–156.Google Scholar
Carroll, Archie B. ‘A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices’, in Crane, Andrew, Matten, Dirk, McWilliams, Abagail, Moon, Jeremy and Siegel, Donald S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 19–45.Google Scholar
Cazala, Julien. ‘Le respect des droits de l’homme comme justification de la violation d’un traité d’investissement’, in Hamida, Walid Ben and Coulée, Frédérique (eds.), Convergences et contradictions du droit des investissements et des droits de l’homme: une approche contentieuse (Paris: Pedone, 2017), 333–355.Google Scholar
Chen, Richard C. ‘A Contractual Approach to Investor-State Regulatory Disputes’ (2015) 40(2) Yale Journal of International Law 295–336.Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (London: Stevens, 1953), Chapter 14.Google Scholar
Chetail, Vincent. ‘The Legal Personality of Multinational Corporations, State Responsibility and Due Diligence: The Way Forward’, in Alland, Denis, Chetail, Vincent, de Frouville, Olivier and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), Unity and Diversity of International Law: Essays in Honour of Prof, Pierre-Marie Dupuy (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2014), 105–130.Google Scholar
Chew, Seraphina, Reed, Lucy and Thomas QC, J. Christopher. ‘Report: Survey on Obstacles to Settlement of Investor-State Disputes’ (2018) NUS Centre for International Law Research Paper No. 18/01; NUS Law Working Paper No. 2018/022.Google Scholar
Choudhury, Barnali. ‘Investor Obligations for Human Rights’ (2020) 35(1–2) ICSID Review 82–104.Google Scholar
Choudhury, Barnali. ‘The Role of Soft Law Corporate Responsibilities in Defining Investor Obligations in International Investment Agreements’, in Ho, Jean and Sattorova, Mavluda (eds.), Investors’ International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2021), 151–168.Google Scholar
Churchill, Robin R. ‘Environmental Rights in Existing Human Rights Treaties’, in Boyle, Alan and Anderson, Michael R. (eds.), Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), 89–108.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew. Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), Chapters 1, 2.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew. Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), Chapter 4.Google Scholar
Clapp, Jennifer. ‘Transnational Corporations and Global Environmental Governance’, in Dauvergne, Peter (ed.), Handbook of Global Environmental Politics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005), 284–297.Google Scholar
Claxton, James M. ‘Compelling Parties to Mediate Investor-State Disputes: No Pressure, No Diamonds?’ (2020) 20(1) Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 78–100.Google Scholar
CoeJr., Jack. ‘Concurrent Co-Mediation: Toward a More Collaborative Centre of Gravity in Investor-State Dispute Resolution’, in Titi, Catharine and Gómez, Katia Fach (eds.), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 61–78.Google Scholar
CoeJr., Jack. ‘Should Mediation of Investment Disputes Be Encouraged, and, If So, by Whom and How?’ (2009) 3 Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation: The Fordham Papers 339–357.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jesse, Johnson, Lise, Güven, Brooke, Cotula, Lorenzo and Berger, Thierry. ‘Third Party Rights in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Options for Reform’ (2019) Submission to UNCITRAL Working Group III on ISDS Reform, contributed by Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), and International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), available at: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/wgiii_reformoptions_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Constain, Silvia. ‘Mediation in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Government Policy and the Changing Landscape’ (2014) 29(1) ICSID Review 25–40.Google Scholar
Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘International Arbitration and the Quest for the Applicable Law’ (2008) 8(3) Global Jurist 1–42.Google Scholar
Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Why Arbitration Needs Conflict of Laws Rules’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 17 October 2018.Google Scholar
Corkin, Joseph. ‘Misappropriating Citizenship: The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility’, in Boeger, Nina, Murray, Rachel and Villiers, Charlotte (eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008), 39–62.Google Scholar
Cosbey, Aaron, Maennling, Nicolas, Geipe, Jeff, Mann, Howard, Toledano, Perrinem and Brauch, Martin Dietrich. ‘Mining a Mirage? Reassessing the Shared-Value Paradigm in Light of the Technological Advances in the Mining Sector’, International Institute for Sustainable Development, September 2016.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas, Echandi, Roberto, Leal-Arcas, Rafael, Liechti, Rachel and Payosova, Tetyana. ‘The Principle of Proportionality in International Law: Foundations and Variations’ (2017) 18(4) Journal of World Investment & Trade 628–672.Google Scholar
Cotula, Lorenzo. ‘(Dis)integration in Global Resource Governance: Extractivism, Human Rights, and Investment Treaties’ (2020) 23(2) Journal of International Economic Law 431–454.Google Scholar
Cotula, Lorenzo and Neal, Terrence. ‘UNCITRAL Working Group III: Can Reforming Procedures Rebalance Investor Rights and Obligations?’ (2019) Investment Policy Brief No. 15, 1–5.Google Scholar
Cotula, Lorenzo and Perrone, Nicolas M. ‘Investors’ International Law and Its Asymmetries: The Case of Local Communities’, in Ho, Jean and Sattorova, Mavluda (eds.), Investors’ International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2021), 71–88.Google Scholar
Cotula, Lorenzo and Perrone, Nicolas M. ‘Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement: What about Third-Party Rights?’ (2019) IIED Briefing 1–4.Google Scholar
Cotula, Lorenzo and Schröder, Mika. Community Perspectives in Investor-State Arbitration (2017) IIED Land, Investment and Rights Series, available at: https://pubs.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/12603IIED.pdf.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul P. ‘Substantive Legitimate Expectations in Domestic and Community Law’ (1996) 55(2) Cambridge Law Journal 289–312.Google Scholar
Crawford, James. Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 9th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), Chapter 31.Google Scholar
Crawford, James. ‘The ILC’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect’ (2002) 96(4) American Journal of International Law 874–890.Google Scholar
Crawford, James. ‘Treaty and Contract in Investment Arbitration’ (2008) 24(3) Arbitration International 351–374.Google Scholar
Crawford, James and Olleson, Simon. ‘The Application of the Rules of State Responsibility’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Griebel, Jörn, Hobe, Stephan and Reinisch, August (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015), 411–441.Google Scholar
Crow, Kevin and Lorenzoni Escobar, Lina. ‘International Corporate Obligations, Human Rights, and the Urbaser Standard: Breaking New Ground?’ (2017) 144 Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht 1–31.Google Scholar
Custer, Lawrence B. ‘The Origins of the Doctrine of Parens Patriae’ (1978) 27(2) Emory Law Journal 195–208.Google Scholar
Dahlsrud, Alexander. ‘How Corporate Social Responsibility Is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions’ (2008) 15(1) Corporate Social Responsibility Environment Management 1–13.Google Scholar
Dahran, M. R. and Von Kumberg, Wolf. ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reconceptionalized: Regulation of Disputes, Standards and Mediation’ (2017) 17(2) Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 467–496.Google Scholar
Đajić, Sanja. ‘Mapping the Good Faith Principle in International Investment Arbitration: Assessment of Its Substantive and Procedural Value’ (2012) 46(3) Zbornik Radova 207–234.Google Scholar
Dalhuisen, Hendrik and Guzman, Andrew T. ‘The Applicable Law in Foreign Investment Disputes’ (2014) 8(2) World Arbitration and Mediation Review 229–250.Google Scholar
Daly, Brooks W. and Poon, Fiona. ‘Technical and Legal Experts in International Investment Disputes’, in Giorgetti, Chiara (ed.), Litigating International Investment Disputes: A Practitioner’s Guide (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2014), 323–374.Google Scholar
Dani, Mojtaba and Akhtar-Khavari, Afshin. ‘Rethinking the Use of Deference in Investment Arbitration: New Solutions against the Perception of Bias’ (2018) 22(1) UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 37–69.Google Scholar
Danic, Olivia. ‘Droit international des investissements, droits de l’homme, droit de l’environnement’, in Leben, Charles (ed.), Droit international des investissements et de l’arbitrage transnational (Paris: Pedone, 2015), 531–579.Google Scholar
Danis-Fatôme, Anne and Viney, Geneviève. ‘La responsabilité civile dans la loi relative au devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des entreprises donneuses d’ordre’ (2017) 28 Recueil Dalloz 1610–1618.Google Scholar
Daoud, Emmanuel and Le Corre, Clarisse. ‘Arrêt Erika: marée verte sur le droit de la responsabilité civile et pénale des compagnies pétrolières’ (2012) 122 Le Lamy droit pénal des affaires 1–7.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Susmita, Laplante, Benoit, Wang, Hua and Wheeler, David, ‘Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve’ (2002) 16(1) Journal of Economic Perspectives 147–168.Google Scholar
Davis, Seth and Whytock, Christopher A. ‘State Remedies for Human Rights’ (2018) 98(2) Boston University Law Review 397–484.Google Scholar
De Brabandere, Eric. Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), Chapter 2.Google Scholar
De Castro, Gregorio. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Restructuring in the EU: A Historical Overview of Recent Developments’, in International Institute for Labour Studies, Governance, International Law & Corporate Social Responsibility (Geneva: ILO, 2008), 129–154.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Alice. Transnational Corporations and International Law: Accountability in the Global Business Environment (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), Chapter 8.Google Scholar
De Luca, Anna and Baltag, Crina. ‘Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration: Reflections on UNCITRAL WG III Reform’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 5 November 2021.Google Scholar
De Luca, Anna and Bonfanti, Angelica. ‘Investment and Human Rights: Is There an Elephant in the Room?’ (2020) 282 Columbia FDI Perspectives 1–3.Google Scholar
De Ly, Filip, Friedman, Mark and Brozolo, Luca Radicati Di. ‘International Law Association International Commercial Arbitration Committee’s Report and Recommendations on “Ascertaining the Contents of the Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration”’ (2010) 26(2) Arbitration International 193–220.Google Scholar
De Nanteuil, Arnaud. ‘Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration: Old Questions, New Answers?’ (2018) 17(2) The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 374–392.Google Scholar
De Schutter, Olivier. ‘La responsabilité des Etats dans le contrôle des sociétés transnationales: vers une Convention internationale sur la lutte contre les atteintes aux droits de l’homme commises par les sociétés transnationales’, in Decaux, Emmanuel (ed.), La responsabilité des entreprises multinationales en matière de droits de l’homme (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2010), 19–100.Google Scholar
De Schutter, Olivier. ‘Transnational Corporations as Instruments of Human Development’, in Alston, Philip and Robinson, Mary (eds.), Human Rights and Development: Towards Mutual Reinforcement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 403–444.Google Scholar
Deacon, Robert T. and Norman, Catherine S. ‘Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve Describe How Individual Countries Behave?’ (2006) 82(2) Land Economics 291–315.Google Scholar
Decaux, Emmanuel. ‘Présentation’, in Decaux, Emmanuel (ed.), La responsabilité des entreprises multinationales en matière de droits de l’homme (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2010), 11–17.Google Scholar
Deumier, Pascale. ‘Les codes de conduite des entreprises et l’effectivité des droits de l’Homme’, in Boy, Laurence, Racine, Jean-Baptiste and Siiriainen, Fabrice (eds.), Droit économique et droits de l’Homme (Belgium: Larcier, 2009), 671–696.Google Scholar
Deva, Surya. ‘International Investment Agreements and Human Rights: Assessing the Role of the UN’s Business and Human Rights Regulatory Initiatives’, in Chaisse, Julien, Choukroune, Leïla and Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Singapore: Springer, 2021), 1733–1758.Google Scholar
Diehl, Alexandra. The Core Standard of International Investment Protection: Fair and Equitable Treatment (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2012), Chapter 6.Google Scholar
Diel-Gligor, Katharina and Hennecke, Rudolf. ‘Investment in Accordance with the Law’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Griebel, Jörn, Hobe, Stephan and Reinisch, August (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015), 566–576.Google Scholar
DiMascio, Nicholas and Pauwelyn, Joost. ‘Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?’ (2008) 102(1) American Journal of International Law 48–89.Google Scholar
Dimitropoulos, Georgios. ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform and Theory of Institutional Design’ (2018) 9(4) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 535–569.Google Scholar
Dimsey, Mariel. ‘Article 4: Submission by a Third Person’, in Euler, Dimitrij, Gehring, Markus and Scherer, Maxi (eds.), Transparency in International Investment Arbitration: A Guide to the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-Based Investor-State Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 128–195.Google Scholar
Dodge, William S. ‘Breaking the Public Law Taboo’ (2002) 43(1) Harvard International Law Journal 161–236.Google Scholar
Dodge, William S. ‘Jesner v. Arab Bank: The Supreme Court Preserves the Possibility of Human Rights Suits Against U.S. Corporations’, UC Davis School of Law Faculty Blogs, 26 April 2018.Google Scholar
Dodge, William S. ‘Local Remedies under NAFTA Chapter 11’, in Gaillard, Emmanuel and Bachand, Frédéric (eds.), Fifteen Years of NAFTA Chapter 11 Arbitration (Huntington, NY: Juris, 2011), 37–56.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Today’s Contours’ (2013) 12(1) Santa Clara Journal of International Law 7–34.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf. ‘The Impact of International Investment Treaties on Domestic Administrative Law’ (2005) 37(4) New York Journal of International Law and Politics 953–972.Google Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph. Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), Chapter X.Google Scholar
Dörr, Oliver, ‘Article 32: Supplementary Means of Interpretation’, in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Heidelberg: Springer, 2012), 571–586.Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary. ‘The Enforcement of Environmental Norms in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in Dupuy, Pierre-Marie and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), Harnessing Foreign Investment to Promote Environmental Protection: Incentives and Safeguards (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 415–444.Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary. ‘The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2003) 74(1) British Yearbook of International Law 151–289.Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary. The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), Chapters 1–6.Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary. ‘International Responsibility for Domestic Adjudication: Denial of Justice Deconstructed’ (2014) 63(4) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 867–900.Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary. ‘Other Specific Regimes of Responsibility: Investment Treaty Arbitration and ICSID: Investment Treaty Arbitration and ICSID’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 815–842.Google Scholar
Douglas, Zachary. ‘The Plea of Illegality in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2014) 29(1) ICSID Review 155–186.Google Scholar
Drimmer, Jonathan and Torrance, Michael. ‘CSR Risk Management and Due Diligence’, in Lindsay, Rae and Martella, Roger (eds.), Corporate Responsibility, Sustainable Business: Environmental, Social and Governance Frameworks for the 21st Century (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2020), 611–627.Google Scholar
Dubin, Laurence. ‘L’entreprise multinationale, de la fragmentation à la reconstruction par le droit international’, in Dubin, Laurence, Bodeau-Livinec, Pierre, Iten, Jean-Louis and Tomkiewicz, Vincent (eds.), L’entreprise multinationale et le droit international (Paris: Pedone, 2017), 13–51.Google Scholar
Dudas, Stefan. ‘Treaty Counterclaims under the ICSID Convention’, in Baltag, Crina (ed.), ICSID Convention after 50 Years: Unsettled Issues (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2017), 385–405.Google Scholar
Dugard, John. ‘Diplomatic Protection and Human Rights: The Draft Articles of the International Law Commission’ (2005) 24(1) Australian Yearbook of International Law 75–91.Google Scholar
Duggal, Kabir A. N. and van de Ven, Laurens H. ‘The 2019 Netherlands Model BIT: Riding the New Investment Treaty Waves’ (2019) 35(3) Arbitration International 347–374.Google Scholar
Dukes, E. Franklin. ‘What We Know about Environmental Conflict Resolution: An Analysis Based on Research’ (2004) 22(1–2) Conflict Resolution Quarterly 191–220.Google Scholar
Dumberry, Patrick. ‘The Clean Hands Doctrine as a General Principle of International Law’ (2020) 21(4) Journal of World Investment & Trade 489–527.Google Scholar
Dumberry, Patrick. ‘L’entreprise, sujet de droit international? Retour sur la question à la lumière des développements récents du droit international des investissements’ (2004) 108(1) Revue générale de droit international public 103–121.Google Scholar
Dumberry, Patrick. A Guide to General Principles of Law in International Investment Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), Chapters 1, 3, 4.Google Scholar
Dumberry, Patrick. ‘The Protection of Investors’ Legitimate Expectations and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105’ (2014) 31(1) Journal of International Arbitration 47–74.Google Scholar
Dumberry, Patrick. ‘State of Confusion: The Doctrine of Clean Hands in Investment Arbitration after the Yukos Award’ (2016) 17(2) Journal of World Investment & Trade 229–259.Google Scholar
Dumberry, Patrick and Dumas-Aubin, Gabrielle. ‘When and How Allegations of Human Rights Violations Can Be Raised in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2012) 13(3) Journal of World Investment & Trade 349–372.Google Scholar
Dupuy, Florian and Dupuy, Pierre-Marie. ‘What to Expect from Legitimate Expectations? A Critical Appraisal and Look into the Future of the “Legitimate Expectations” Doctrine in International Investment Law’, in Abdel Raouf, Mohamed, Leboulanger, Philippe and Ziadé, Nassib G. (eds.), Festschrift Ahmed Sadek El-Kosheri: From the Arab World to the Globalization of International Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2015), 273–298.Google Scholar
Earnest, David L. ‘The Duty of Arbitrators to Delimitate between Jurisdiction and Admissibility in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2018) 17(1) The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 135–144.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank and Fischel, Daniel. ‘Limited Liability and the Corporation’ (1985) 52(1) Chicago Law Review 89–117.Google Scholar
Eccles, Robert G. and Klimenko, Svetlana. ‘The Investor Revolution: Shareholders Are Getting Serious about Sustainability’, Harvard Business Review, May–June 2019.Google Scholar
Elrifai, Silke Noa. ‘Equity-Based Discretion and the Anatomy of Damages Assessment in Investment Treaty Law’ (2017) 34(5) Journal of International Arbitration 835–888.Google Scholar
Endicott, Martin. ‘Remedies in Investor-State Arbitration: Restitution, Specific Performance and Declaratory Awards’, in Kahn, Philippe and Wälde, Thomas W. (eds.), Les aspects nouveaux du droit des investissements internationaux/New aspects of international investment law (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007), 517–552.Google Scholar
English, Alexander. ‘Calming the Waters: Environmental Mediation and Water Resources Disputes’ (2017) 47(1) Texas Environmental Law Journal 1–16.Google Scholar
Enneking, Liesbeth. ‘Crossing the Atlantic? The Political and Legal Feasibility of European Foreign Direct Liability Cases’ (2009) 40(4) George Washington International Law Review 903–938.Google Scholar
Enneking, Liesbeth. Foreign Direct Liability and Beyond: Exploring the Role of Tort Law in Promoting International Corporate Social Responsibility and Accountability (The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2012), Chapter 9.Google Scholar
Eroglu, Muzaffer. Multinational Enterprises and Tort Liabilities (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008), Chapters 5, 7.Google Scholar
Erwin, Patrick M. ‘Corporate Codes of Conduct: The Effects of Code Content and Quality on Ethical Performance’ (2011) 99(4) Journal of Business Ethics 535–548.Google Scholar
Esty, Daniel C. ‘The World Trade Organization’s Legitimacy Crisis’ (2002) 1(1) World Trade Review 7–22.Google Scholar
Evans, Kimberly. ‘Foreign Portfolio and Direct Investment: Complementarity, Differences and Integration’ (2002) Paper prepared on the OECD Global forum on international investment in Shanghai, available at: www.oecd.org/investment/investmentfordevelopment/2764407.pdf.Google Scholar
Fahner, Johannes Hendrik. ‘The Conundrum of Contributory Fault in Investment Arbitratin: From Causation to Apportionment, Book Review of Jarrett Martin, Contributory Fault and Investor Misconduct in Investment Arbitration (CUP 2019)’ (2021) 37(3) Arbitration International 769–780.Google Scholar
Fahner, Johannes Hendrik. Judicial Deference in International Adjudication: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford: Hart, 2020), Chapter 3.Google Scholar
Farmer, Susan Beth. ‘More Lessons from the Laboratories: Cy Pres Distributions in Parens Patriae Antitrust Actions Brought by State Attorneys General’ (1999) 68(2) Fordham Law Review 361–406.Google Scholar
Fatoux, François. ‘La différenciation normative selon les activités’, in Decaux, Emmanuel (ed.), La responsabilité des entreprises multinationales en matière de droits de l’homme (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2010), 155–160.Google Scholar
Fenton, Ruth. ‘A Civil Matter for a Common Expert: How Should Parties and Tribunals Use Experts in International Commercial Arbitration?’ (2006) 6(2) Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 279–293.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Feijoo, Belen, Romero, Silvia and Ruiz, Silvia. ‘Effect of Stakeholders’ Pressure on Transparency of Sustainability Reports within the GRI Framework’ (2014) 122(1) Journal of Business Ethics 53–63.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Gerald. ‘The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’ (1957) 92 Recueil des Cours 1–227, Chapter VII.Google Scholar
Flett, James. ‘When Is an Expert Not an Expert?’ (2018) 9(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 352–360.Google Scholar
Fontanelli, Filippo. Jurisdiction and Admissibility in Investment Arbitration: The Practice and the Theory (Leiden: Brill, 2017), Part B.Google Scholar
Foster, Caroline E. ‘New Clothes for the Emperor? Consultation of Experts by the International Court of Justice’ (2014) 5(1) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 139–173.Google Scholar
Foster, George K. ‘Investors, States, and Stakeholders: Power Asymmetries in International Investment and the Stabilizing Potential of Investment Treaties’ (2013) 17(2) Lewis & Clark Law Review 361–422.Google Scholar
Francioni, Francesco. ‘Access to Justice, Denial of Justice and International Investment Law’ (2009) 20(3) European Journal of International Law 729–747.Google Scholar
Francioni, Francesco. ‘International Human Rights in an Environmental Horizon’ (2010) 21(2) European Journal of International Law 41–55.Google Scholar
Franck, Susan D. ‘The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law through Inconsistent Decisions’ (2005) 73(4) Fordham Law Review 1521–1625.Google Scholar
Franck, Susan D. ‘Using Investor-State Mediation Rules to Promote Conflict Management: An Introductory Guide’ (2014) 29(1) ICSID Review 66–89.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), Chapters 1, 2.Google Scholar
Fredman, Sandra. Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), Introduction, Chapter 3.Google Scholar
French, Duncan. ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’ (2006) 55(2) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 281–314.Google Scholar
Frey, Barbara A. ‘The Legal and Ethical Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations in the Protection of International Human Rights’ (1997) 6(1) Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 153–188.Google Scholar
Friedman, Mark W. and Popova, Ina C. ‘Can State Counterclaims Salvage Investment Arbitration?’ (2014) 8(2) World Arbitration and Mediation Review 139–179.Google Scholar
Fry, James D. ‘International Human Rights Law in Investment Arbitration: Evidence of International Law’s Unity’ (2007) 18(1) Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 77–149.Google Scholar
Gaillard, Emmanuel. ‘L’avenir des traités de protection des investissements’, in Leben, Charles (ed.), Droit international de l’investissement et de l’arbitrage transnational (Paris: Pedone, 2015), 1037–1041.Google Scholar
Gaillard, Emmanuel and Banifatemi, Yas. ‘The Meaning of ‘‘and’’ in Article 42(1), Second Sentence, of the Washington Convention: The Role of International Law in the ICSID Choice of Law Process’ (2003) 18(2) ICSID Review 375–411.Google Scholar
Gaja, Giorgio. ‘The Position of Individuals in International Law: An ILC Perspective’ (2010) 21(1) European Journal of International Law 11–14.Google Scholar
Galindo, Alvaro and Elsisi, Ahmed. ‘Non-Disputing Parties’ Rights in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: The Application of the Monetary Gold Principle’, in Gómez, Katia Fach (ed.), Private Actors in International Investment Law (Cham: Springer, 2021), 175–190.Google Scholar
Galvão Teles, Patrícia. ‘The Impact and Influence of the Articles on State Responsibility on the Work of the International Law Commission and Beyond’, European Journal of International Law Talk!, 3 August 2021.Google Scholar
García-Sánchez, Isabel-María, Hussain, Nazim, Martínez-Ferrero, Jennifer and Ruiz-Barbadillo, Emiliano. ‘Impact of Disclosure and Assurance Quality of Corporate Sustainability Reports on Access to Finance’ (2019) 26(4) Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 832–848.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Richard. Treaty Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), Chapter 8.Google Scholar
Garner, Bryan A. (editor in chief), Black’s Law Dictionary, 11th ed. (St. Paul, MN: Thomson Reuters, 2019).Google Scholar
Garsten, Bryan. ‘Representative Government and Popular Sovereignty’, in Shapiro, Ian, Stokes, Susan C., Jean Wood, Elisabeth and Kirshner, Alexander S. (eds.), Political Representation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 90–109.Google Scholar
Gathii, James Thuo. ‘Understanding Tanzania’s Termination of Its BIT with the Netherlands in Context’, AfronomicsLaw, 1 April 2019, available at: www.afronomicslaw.org/2019/04/01/understanding-tanzanias-termination-of-its-bit-with-the-netherlands-in-context.Google Scholar
Gaukrodger, David. ‘Business Responsibilities and Investment Treaties’ (2021) OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2021/02, 1–128.Google Scholar
Gazzini, Tarcisio. ‘General Principles of Law in the Field of Foreign Investment’ (2009) 10(1) Journal of World Investment & Trade 103–119.Google Scholar
George, James Paul. ‘Defining Filartiga: Characterizing International Torture Claims in United States Courts’ (1984) 3(1) Dickinson Journal of International Law 1–42.Google Scholar
Ghouri, Ahmad Ali. ‘On Genealogy of Proposals to Reform Investor-State Arbitration’ (2014) 11(1) Transnational Dispute Management 1–11.Google Scholar
Gill, Judith and Gupta, Rishab. ‘The Principle of Contributory Fault after Yukos’ (2015) 9(2) Dispute Resolution International 93–114.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. ‘International Substitutes for Domestic Institutions: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Governance’ (2005) 25(1) International Review of Law & Economics 107–123.Google Scholar
Giorgetti, Chiara. ‘Hulley Enterprises Ltd. (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation, Yukos Universal Ltd. (Isle of Man) v. Russian Federation, Veteran Petroleum Ltd. (Cyprus) v. Russian Federation’ (2015) 109(2) American Journal of International Law 387–393.Google Scholar
Giuliani, Elisa and Macchi, Chiara. ‘Multinational Corporations’ Economic and Human Rights Impacts on Developing Countries: A Review and Research Agenda’ (2014) 38(2) Cambridge Journal of Economics 479–517.Google Scholar
Glinski, Carola. ‘Corporate Codes of Conduct: Moral or Legal Obligation?’, in McBarnet, Doreen, Voiculescu, Aurora and Campbell, Tom (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 119–147.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Stephen B., Sander, Frank E. A., Rogers, Nancy H. and Cole, Sarah Rudolph. Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation, Arbitration, and Other Processes, 7th ed. (New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2020), Chapter 5.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Stephen B. and Shaw, Margaret L. ‘The Past, Present, and Future of Mediation as Seen through the Eyes of Some of Its Founders’ (2010) 26(2) Negotiation Journal 237–253.Google Scholar
Goldhaber, Michael D. ‘Corporate Human Rights Litigation in Non-U.S. Courts: A Comparative Scorecard’ (2013) 3(1) University of California Irvine Law Review 126–149.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Itay and Razin, Assaf. ‘Foreign Direct Investment vs Foreign Portfolio Investment’ (2005) NBER Working Paper No. 11047.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Itay, Razin, Assaf and Tong, Hui. ‘Liquidity, Institutional Quality and the Composition of International Equity Flows’ (2010) NBER Working Paper No. 15727.Google Scholar
Gordon, Kathryn and Pohl, Joachim. ‘Environmental Concerns in International Investment Agreements: A Survey’ (2011) 1 OECD Working Papers on International Investment 9–14.Google Scholar
Gouiffès, Laurent and Ordonez, Mellisa. ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility: Are We Closer to a Line in the Sand?’ (2015) 31(1) Arbitration International 107–122.Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, Anastasios. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law: The Art of Watching Out for Both the “Elephants” and the “Fleas” in the (Normative) “Room” of Investment Protection’ (2015) 16(2) Journal of World Investment & Trade 335–359.Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, Anastasios. ‘The Nature of Investor’s Rights under Investment Treaties: A Comment on Paparinskis’ “Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility”’, European Journal of International Law Talk!, 22 October 2013.Google Scholar
Grehan, Kevin J. ‘Comparative Negligence’ (1981) 81(8) Columbia Law Review 1668–1701.Google Scholar
Grisel, Florian. ‘The Sources of Foreign Investment Law’, in Douglas, Zachary, Pauwelyn, Joost and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 214–233.Google Scholar
Grossman, Nienke. ‘The Normative Legitimacy of International Courts’ (2013) 86(1) Temple Law Review 61–106.Google Scholar
Grušić, Uglješa. ‘Responsibility in Groups of Companies and the Future of International Human Rights and Environmental Litigation’ (2015) 74(1) Cambridge Law Journal 30–34.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, Kagan, Robert A. and Thornton, Dorothy. ‘Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go beyond Compliance’ (2004) 29(2) Law & Social Inquiry 307–341.Google Scholar
Guntrip, Edward. ‘A Host State Human Rights Counterclaim in Investment Arbitration’ (2018) Crowd-Drafting: Designing a Human Rights-Compatible International Investment Agreement, Session at the United Nations Forum on Business and Human Rights 2018.Google Scholar
Güven, Brooke Skartvedt. ‘Investor-State Mediation: An Opportunity to Advance Sustainable Outcomes’ (2020) CCSI, available at: https://ccsi.columbia.edu/news/investor-state-mediation-opportunity-advance-sustainable-outcomes.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. ‘Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes’ (1980) 32(3) World Politics 357–405.Google Scholar
Haftel, Yoram Z. and Thompson, Alexander. ‘When Do States Renegotiate Investment Agreements? The Effect of Arbitration’ (2018) 13(1) The Review of International Organizations 25–48.Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica. ‘State Bystander Responsibility’ (2010) 21(2) European Journal of International Law 341–385.Google Scholar
Hamamoto, Shotaro. ‘Protection of the Investor’s Legitimate Expectations: Intersection of a Treaty Obligation and a General Principle of Law’, in Shan, Wenhua and Jinyuan, Su (eds.), China and International Investment Law: Twenty Years of ICSID Membership (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2015), 141–169.Google Scholar
Hamann, Andrea. ‘The Use of Ex Curia Experts in International Litigation: Why the WTO Dispute Settlement Cannot Serve to Improve ICJ Practice’, in Fabri, Hélène Ruiz (ed.), International Law and Litigation: A Look into Procedure (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2019), 107–146.Google Scholar
Hamdani, Khalil and Ruffing, Lorraine. ‘Lessons from the UN Centre on Transnational Corporations for the Current Treaty Initiative’, in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds.), Building a Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Context and Contours: Context and Contours (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 27–47.Google Scholar
Handl, Gunther F., Reisman, W. Michael, Simma, Bruno, Dupuy, Pierre-Marie and Chinkin, Christine. ‘A Hard Look at Soft Law’ (1988) 82 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 371–395.Google Scholar
Hanna, Gabrielle J. ‘The Helicopter State: Misuse of Parens Patriae Unconstitutionally Precludes Individual and Class Claims’ (2017) 92(4) Washington Law Review 1955–1990.Google Scholar
Hansen, Robin F. ‘Parallel Proceedings in Investor-State Treaty Arbitration: Responses for Treaty-Drafters, Arbitrators and Parties’ (2010) 73(4) Modern Law Review 523–550.Google Scholar
Happold, Matthew and Radović, Relja. ‘The ECOWAS Court of Justice as an Investment Tribunal’ (2018) 19(1) Journal of World Investment & Trade 95–117.Google Scholar
Harder, Jennifer. ‘Environmental Mediation: The Promise and the Challenge’ (1995) 19(1) Environs: Environmental Law and Policy Journal 29–43.Google Scholar
Harmon-Darrow, Caroline, Charkoudian, Lorig, Ford, Tracee, Ennis, Michele and Bridgeford, Erricka. ‘Defining Inclusive Mediation: Theory, Practice, and Research’ (2020) 37(4) Conflict Resolution Quarterly 305–324.Google Scholar
Harrison, James. ‘Environmental Counterclaims in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2016) 17(3) Journal of World Investment & Trade 479–488.Google Scholar
Harrison, John. ‘Environmental Mediation: The Ethical and Constitutional Dimension’ (1997) 9(1) Journal of Environmental Law 79–102.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Law Series, 1961), Chapter V.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. ‘Discretion’ (2013) 127(2) Harvard Law Review (written in 1956) 652–665.Google Scholar
Hartka, Margaret. ‘The Role of International Law in Domestic Courts: Will the Legal Procrastination End?’ (1990) 14(1) Maryland Journal of International Law 99–125.Google Scholar
Haynes, Jason. ‘The Evolving Nature of the Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) Standard: Challenging Its Increasing Pervasiveness in Light of Developing Countries’ Concerns – The Case for Regulatory Rebalancing’ (2013) 14(1) Journal of World Investment & Trade 114–146.Google Scholar
Haynes, Jason. ‘The Shifting Pendulum: Foreign Investors’ Liability under Canada’s Common Law for Breaches of Customary International Law’ (2021) 36(3) Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 447–465.Google Scholar
Hedley, R. Alan. ‘Transnational Corporations and Their Regulation: Issues and Strategies’ (1999) 40(2) International Journal of Comparative Sociology 215–230.Google Scholar
Heiskanen, Veijo. ‘Ménage à trois? Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Competence in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2014) 29(1) ICSID Review 231–246.Google Scholar
Helleringer, Geneviève and Garcia, Kiteri. ‘Le rayonnement des droits de l’Homme et des droits fondamentaux en droit privé’ (2014) 66(2) Revue internationale de droit comparé, Études de droit contemporain. Contributions françaises au 19e Congrès international de droit comparé (Vienne, 20 – 26 juillet 2014) 283–336.Google Scholar
Henckels, Caroline. ‘Legitimate Expectations and the Rule of Law in International Investment Law’ (2020) available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3409086.Google Scholar
Henckels, Caroline. Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), Chapters 1, 2.Google Scholar
Henckels, Caroline. ‘Protecting Regulatory Autonomy through Greater Precision in Investment Treaties: The TPP, CETA, and TTIP’ (2016) 19(1) Journal of International Economic Law 27–50.Google Scholar
Hepburn, Jarrod. Domestic Law in International Investment Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), Chapters 5–7.Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), Chapter 3.Google Scholar
Hilson, Gavin. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the Extractive Industries: Experiences from Developing Countries’ (2012) 37(2) Resources Policy 131–137.Google Scholar
Hindelang, Steffen. ‘Restitution and Compensation: Reconstructing the Relationship in Investment Treaty Law’, in Hofmann, Rainer and Tams, Christian J. (eds.), International Investment Law and General International Law: From Clinical Isolation to Systemic Integration? (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2011), 161–199.Google Scholar
Ho, Jean. ‘International Law’s Opportunities for Investor Accountability’, in Ho, Jean and Sattorova, Mavluda (eds.), Investors’ International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2021), 13–44.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Mélida and Stewart, Melissa. ‘Experts in Investor-State Arbitration: The Tribunal as Gatekeeper’ (2018) 9(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 453–463.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Anne K. ‘Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration’ (2013) 28(2) ICSID Review 438–453.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Anne K. ‘Counterclaims: Spyridon Roussalis v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/01’, in Kinnear, Meg, Fischer, Geraldine R., Almeida, Jara Mínguez, Torres, Luisa Fernanda and Bidegain, Mairée Uran (eds.), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2015), 505–520.Google Scholar
Igbokwe, Virtus Chitoo. ‘Determination, Interpretation and Application of Substantive Law in Foreign Investment Treaty Arbitrations’ (2006) 23(4) Journal of International Arbitration 267–300.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, Tomoko. ‘Counterclaims and the Rule of Law in Investment Arbitration’ (2019) 113 American Journal of International Law Unbound 33–37.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, Tomoko. ‘Intervention: Investment Arbitration’, in Fabri, Hélène Ruiz (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Iten, Jean-Louis. ‘Les rattachements de l’entreprise multinationale: le point de vue du droit international public’, in Dubin, Laurence, Bodeau-Livinec, Pierre, Iten, Jean-Louis and Tomkiewicz, Vincent (eds.), L’entreprise multinationale et le droit international (Paris: Pedone, 2017), 99–113.Google Scholar
Jacur, Francesca Romanin. ‘Remarks on the Role of Ex Curia Scientific Experts in International Environmental Disputes’, in Boschiero, Nerina, Pitea, Cesare, Ragni, Chiara and Scovazzi, Tullio (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law: Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves (The Hague: Asser Press, 2013), 441–455.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Kathleen. ‘Environmental Claims under the Alien Tort Statute’ (2010) 28(2) Berkeley Journal of International Law 519–536.Google Scholar
Jägers, Nicola. Corporate Human Rights Obligations: In Search of Accountability (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2002), Chapters I, VI.Google Scholar
Jamali, Dima. ‘The CSR of MNC Subsidiaries in Developing Countries: Global, Local, Substantive or Diluted?’ (2010) 93(Suppl. 2) Journal of Business Ethics 181–200.Google Scholar
Jana, Andrés. ‘Reparation in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2016) 110 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 288–292.Google Scholar
Janis, Mark W. ‘The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens and the Bhopal Case’ (1987) 34(2) Netherlands International Law Review 192–203.Google Scholar
Jarrett, Martin. Contributory Fault and Investor Misconduct in Investment Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019), Chapters 1, 3–6.Google Scholar
Jarrett, Martin. ‘Responding to Investor Misconduct: The Line between Lawful and Unlawful Responses and Apportionment in Cases of Unlawful Responses’, in Ho, Jean and Sattorova, Mavluda (eds.), Investors’ International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2021), 169–191.Google Scholar
Jarrett, Martin, Puig, Sergio and Ratner, Steven. ‘Investor Accountability: Indirect Actions, Direct Actions by States, and Direct Actions by Individuals’ (2021) Academic Forum on ISDS Concept Paper 2021/1, 1–26.Google Scholar
Javillier, Jean-Claude. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Law: Synergies Are Needed for Sustainable Development’, in International Institute for Labour Studies, Governance, International Law & Corporate Social Responsibility (Geneva: ILO, 2008) 37–62.Google Scholar
Jaworek, Małgorzata and Kuzel, Marcin. ‘Transnational Corporations in the World Economy: Formation, Development and Present Position’ (2015) 4(1) Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting 55–70.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Rhys. ‘Globalization, Corporate Social Responsibility and Poverty’ (2005) 81(3) International Affairs 525–540.Google Scholar
Jenks, C. Wilfred. ‘The Interpretation and Application of Municipal Law by the Permanent Court of International Justice’ (1938) 19 British Yearbook of International Law 67–103.Google Scholar
Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arthur (eds.). Oppenheim’s International Law: Volume I: Peace, 9th ed. (London: Longman, 1992), Chapter 1, Section 21.Google Scholar
Jijelava, David and Vanclay, Frank. ‘Legitimacy, Credibility and Trust as the Key Components of a Social Licence to Operate: An Analysis of BP’s Projects in Georgia’ (2017) 140(3) Journal of Cleaner Production 1077–1086.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jennifer L. ‘Public-Private-Public Convergence: How the Private Actor Can Shape Public International Labor Standards’ (1998) 24(1) Brooklyn Journal of International Law 291–356.Google Scholar
Johnson, Lise and Guven, Brooke Skartvedt. ‘The Settlement of Investment Disputes: A Discussion of Democratic Accountability and the Public Interest’, Investment Treaty News, 13 March 2017.Google Scholar
Joshi, Riddhi Dhananjay and Gurpur, Shashikala. ‘The Silent Spring of Human Rights in Investment Arbitration: Jurisprudence Constante through Case-Law Trajectory’ (2020) 36(4) Arbitration International 557–570.Google Scholar
Jouannet, Emmanuel. ‘L’impossible protection des droits du tiers par la Cour internationale de justice dans les affaires de délimitation maritime’, in Lucchini, Laurent and Quéneudec, Jean-Pierre (eds.), La mer et son droit: Mélanges offerts à Laurent Lucchini et Jean-Pierre Quéneudec (Paris: Pedone, 2003), 315–341.Google Scholar
Juarsa, Nyoman Indra and Persian, Yanuarda Yudo. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in International Economic Law Perspective’ (2015) 2(2) Brawijaya Law Journal 84–102.Google Scholar
Kaeb, Caroline. ‘Emerging Issues of Human Rights Responsibility in the Extractive and Manufacturing Industries: Patterns and Liability Risks’ (2008) 6(2) Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 327–353.Google Scholar
Kaldunski, Marcin. ‘Principle of Clean Hands and Protection of Human Rights in International Investment Arbitration’ (2015) 4(2) Polish Review of International and European Law 69–101.Google Scholar
Kalicki, Jean E. ‘Counterclaims by States in Investment Arbitration’, Investment Treaty News, 14 January 2013.Google Scholar
Kamminga, Menno T. and Zia-Zarifi, Saman. ‘Liability of Multinational Corporations under International Law: An Introduction’, in Kamminga, Menno T. and Zarifi, Saman Zia (eds.), Liability of Multinational Corporations under International Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000), 1–15.Google Scholar
Kang, Kaiser. ‘Innovative but Insufficient? The Investment Court System (ICS) in the EU-Vietnam Investment Protection Agreement (EVIPA)’, European Institute for Asian Studies, 17 August 2021.Google Scholar
Kantor, Mark. ‘The Impact of Contributory Investor Conduct: Only with Difficulty Commensurable’, in Kinnear, Meg, Fischer, Geraldine R., Almeida, Jara Mínguez, Torres, Luisa Fernanda and Bidegain, Mairée Uran (eds.), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2015), 533–553.Google Scholar
Kapoor, Surya. ‘Singapore Convention Series: How Does the Singapore Mediation Convention Affect International Dispute Resolution? ISDS Perspective’, Kluwer Mediation Blog, 15 November 2019.Google Scholar
Karavias, Markos. Corporate Obligations under International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Chapters I–III.Google Scholar
Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle. ‘The Arbitrator and the Law: Does He/She Know It? Apply It? How? And a Few More Questions’ (2005) 21(4) Arbitration International 631–638.Google Scholar
Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle and Potestà, Michele. ‘The Composition of a Multilateral Investment Court and of an Appeal Mechanism for Investment Awards’, CIDS Supplemental Report, 2017, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3457310.Google Scholar
Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle and Potestà, Michele. Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts: Current Framework and Reform Options (Cham: Springer, 2020).Google Scholar
Kendra, Thomas. ‘State Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration: A New Lease of Life?’ (2013) 29(4) Arbitration International 575–606.Google Scholar
Kerbrat, Yann. ‘Les manifestations de la notion d’entreprise multinationale en droit international’, in Dubin, Laurence, Bodeau-Livinec, Pierre, Iten, Jean-Louis and Tomkiewicz, Vincent (eds.), L’entreprise multinationale et le droit international (Paris: Pedone, 2017), 57–69.Google Scholar
Kessedjian, Catherine. ‘Transnational Public Policy’, in van den Berg, Albert Jan (ed.), International Arbitration 2006: Back to Basics? (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2007), 857–870.Google Scholar
Kessedjian, Catherine, van Aaken, Anne, Lie, Runar and Mistelis, Loukas. ‘Mediation in Future Investor-State Dispute Settlement’ (2020) Academic Forum on ISDS Concept Paper 2020/16.Google Scholar
Kethireddy, Srinath Reddy. ‘Still the Law of Nations: Legitimate Expectations and the Sovereigntist Turn in International Investment Law’ (2019) 44(2) Yale Journal of International Law 315–354.Google Scholar
Khoury, Stéfanie and Whyte, David. ‘Sidelining Corporate Human Rights Violations: The Failure of the OECD’s Regulatory Consensus’ (2019) 18(4) Journal of Human Rights 363–381.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict and Schill, Stephan. ‘Investor-State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality and the Emerging Global Administrative Law’ (2009) IILJ Working Paper 2009/6 (Global Administrative Law Series), 1–53.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Stewart, Richard. ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’ (2005) 68(3–4) Law & Contemporary Problems 15–62.Google Scholar
Kinley, David and Tadaki, Junko. ‘From Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law’ (2004) 44(4) Virginia Journal International Law 931–1024.Google Scholar
Kinnear, Meg. ‘ICSID in the Twenty-First Century: An Interview with Meg Kinnear’ (2010) 104 American Society of International Law Proceedings 413–434.Google Scholar
Kinnear, Meg and Le Cannu, Paul-Jean. ‘Concluding Remarks: ICSID and African States Leading International Investment Law Reform’ (2019) 34(2) ICSID Review 542–551.Google Scholar
Kinney, Eleanor D. ‘The International Human Right to Health: What Does This Mean for Our Nation and World?’ (2001) 34(4) Indiana Law Review 1457–1475.Google Scholar
Kjos (Veenstra-Kjos), Hege Elisabeth. Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration: The Interplay between National and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), Chapters 2, 4, and 6.Google Scholar
Kjos (Veenstra-Kjos), Hege Elisabeth. ‘Counterclaims by Host States in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2007) 4(4) Transnational Dispute Management 1–48.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan. An Introduction to International Institutional Law, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), Chapter 3.Google Scholar
Kläger, Roland. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), Chapter 4.Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher R. ‘International Human Rights Litigation after Bauman: The Viability of Veil Piercing to Hale Foreign Parent Corporations into U.S. Courts’ (2016) 41(2) University of Dayton Law Review 214–260.Google Scholar
Knox, John H. ‘Human Rights, Environmental Protection, and the Sustainable Development Goals’ (2015) 24(3) Washington International Law Journal 517–536.Google Scholar
Knox, John H. and Pejan, Ramin. ‘Introduction’, in Knox, John H. and Pejan, Ramin (eds.), The Human Right to a Healthy Environment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 1–16.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘Transnational Legal Process’, (1996) 75(1) Nebraska Law Review 181–207.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘Transnational Public Law Litigation’ (1991) 100(8) Yale Law Journal 2347–2402.Google Scholar
Kolk, Ans and van Tulder, Rob. ‘Setting New Global Rules? TNCs and Codes of Conduct’ (2005) 14(3) Transnational Corporations 1–28.Google Scholar
Kordos, Marcel and Vojtovic, Sergej. ‘Transnational Corporations in the Global World Economic Environment’ (2016) 230 Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 150–158.Google Scholar
KotubyJr., Charles T. and Sobota, Luke A. General Principles of Law and International Due Process: Principles and Norms Applicable in Transnational Disputes (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017), Chapters 1–2.Google Scholar
Krajewski, Markus. ‘The State Duty to Protect against Human Rights Violations through Transnational Business Activities’ (2017) 23 Deakin Law Review 13–40.Google Scholar
Krajewski, Markus, Tonstad, Kristel and Wohltmann, Franziska. ‘Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence in Germany and Norway: Stepping, or Striding, in the Same Direction?’ (2021) 6(3) Business and Human Rights Journal 1–9.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, in Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1983), 1–22.Google Scholar
Kreindler, Richard. ‘Corruption in International Investment Arbitration: Jurisdiction and the Unclean Hands Doctrine’, in Hobér, Kaj, Magnusson, Annette and Öhrström, Marie (eds.), Between East and West: Essays in Honour of Ulf Franke (Huntington, NY: Juris, 2010), 309–328.Google Scholar
Kressel, Kenneth. ‘Mediation Revisited’, in Deutsch, Morton, Coleman, Peter T. and Marcus, Eric C. (eds.), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2011), 726–756.Google Scholar
Kriebaum, Ursula. ‘Human Rights of the Population of the Host State in International Investment Arbitration’ (2009) 10(5) Journal of World Investment & Trade 653–677.Google Scholar
Kriebaum, Ursula. ‘Investment Arbitration – Illegal Investments’, in Klausegger, Christian et al. (eds.), Austrian Arbitration Yearbook 2010 (Vienna: C. H. Beck, Stämpfli & Manz, 2010), 307–335.Google Scholar
Kriebaum, Ursula. ‘Is the European Court of Human Rights an Alternative to Investor-State Arbitration?’, in Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich and Francioni, Francesco (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 219–245.Google Scholar
Kryvoi, Yaraslau (Yarik). ‘Counterclaims in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2012) 21(2) Minnesota Journal of International Law 216–252.Google Scholar
Kryvoi, Yaraslau ‘Economic Crimes in International Investment Law’ (2018) 67(3) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 577–605.Google Scholar
Kryvoi, Yaraslau ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil in International Arbitration’ (2010–2011) 1(2) Global Business Law Review 169–186.Google Scholar
Kubasek, Nancy and Silverman, Gary. ‘Environmental Mediation’ (1988) 26(3) American Business Law Journal 533–556.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Jürgen. ‘On Foreign Investor “Privilege” and the Limits of the Law: A Reply to Ivar Alvik’ (2020) 31(1) European Journal of International Law 313–319.Google Scholar
Kusek, Peter and Silva, Andrea. ‘What Matters to Investors in Developing Countries: Findings from the Global Investment Competitiveness Survey’, in Global Investment Competitiveness Report 2017/2018: Foreign Investor Perspectives and Policy Implications (Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2017), 19–49.Google Scholar
Laborde, Gustavo. ‘The Case for Host State Claims in Investment Arbitration’ (2010) 1(1) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 97–122.Google Scholar
Lahlou, Yasmin, Willard, Rainbow and Craven, Meredith. ‘The Rise of Environmental Counterclaims in Mining Arbitration’, in Fry, Jason and Bret, Louis-Alexis (eds.), The Guide to Mining Arbitration (Global Arbitration Review, 2019), 51–67, available at: www.litigationboutique.com/uploads/files/Canada.pdf.Google Scholar
Lalive, Pierre. ‘Transnational (or Truly International) Public Policy and International Arbitration’, in Sanders, Pieter (ed.), Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration (Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 1987), 258–318.Google Scholar
Lalive, Pierre and Halonen, Laura. ‘On the Availability of Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in Bělohlávek, Alexander J. and Rozehnalová, Naděžda (eds.), Rights of the Host States within the System of International Investment Protection: Czech Yearbook of International Law, Volume II (Huntington, NY: Juris, 2011), 141–156.Google Scholar
Lamb, Sophie, Harrison, Daniel and Hew, Jonathan. ‘Recent Developments in the Law and Practice of Amicus Briefs in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2017) 5(2) Indian Journal of Arbitration Law 72–92.Google Scholar
Langford, Malcolm and Behn, Daniel. ‘Managing Backlash: The Evolving Investment Treaty Arbitrator?’ (2018) 29(2) European Journal of International Law 551–580.Google Scholar
Langford, Malcolm, Potestà, Michele, Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle and Behn, Daniel. ‘Special Issue: UNCITRAL and Investment Arbitration Reform: Matching Concerns and Solutions: An Introduction’ (2020) 21(2–3) Journal of World Investment & Trade 167–187.Google Scholar
Laryea, Emmanuel T. ‘Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Concept and Scope of Application’, in Chaisse, Julien, Choukroune, Leïla and Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Singapore: Springer, 2021), 97–120.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Eli. ‘Issues of Compensation and Nationality in the Taking of Energy Investments’ (1990) 8(1–4) Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 241–250.Google Scholar
Le Cannu, Paul-Jean. ‘Foundation and Innovation: The Participation of African States in the ICSID Dispute Resolution System’ (2018) 33(2) ICSID Review 456–500.Google Scholar
Lee, Thomas H. ‘The Supreme Court of the United States as Quasi-International Tribunal: Reclaiming the Court’s Original and Exclusive Jurisdiction over Treaty-Based Suits by Foreign States Against States’ (2004) 104(7) Columbia Law Review 1765–1885.Google Scholar
Legum, Barton and Petculescu, Ioana. ‘GATT Article XX and International Investment Law’, in Echandi, Roberto and Sauve, Pierre (eds.), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy: World Trade Forum (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 340–362.Google Scholar
Lehr, Amy K. and Smith, Gare A. Implementing a Corporate Free, Prior, and Informed Consent Policy: Benefits and Challenges (Foley Hoag eBook, 2010), available at: https://foleyhoag.com/-/media/files/foley%20hoag/publications/ebooks%20and%20whitepapers/2010/implementing%20a%20corporate%20free%20prior%20and%20informed%20consent%20policy%20benefits%20and%20challenges%200710.ashx.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, Markku, Kojo, Matti, Jartti, Tuija, Litmanen, Tapio and Kari, Mika. ‘The Roles of the State and Social Licence to Operate? Lessons from Nuclear Waste Management in Finland, France, and Sweden’ (2020) 61 Energy Research & Social Science 1–12.Google Scholar
Leikin, Eric, Gadodia, Stuti and Loudon, Charles. ‘The State Doesn’t Strike Back After All: India’s Final Model BIT Takes the Bite out of Investor Obligations and Eliminates State Counterclaims’ (2018) 15(2) Transnational Dispute Management 1–21.Google Scholar
Leinhardt, Stephanie B. ‘Some Thoughts on Foreign Investors’ Responsibilities to Respect Human Rights’ (2013) 10(1) Transnational Dispute Management 1–26.Google Scholar
Lemos, Margaret H. ‘Aggregate Litigation Goes Public: Representative Suits by State Attorneys General’ (2012) 126(2) Harvard Law Review 486–549.Google Scholar
Levashova, Yulia. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment and Investor’s Due Diligence under International Investment Law’ (2020) 67(2) Netherlands International Law Review 233–255.Google Scholar
Lévesque, Céline. ‘The Inclusion of GATT Article XX Exceptions in IIAs: A Potentially Risky Policy’, in Echandi, Roberto and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy: World Trade Forum (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 363–370.Google Scholar
Lim, Alwyn and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. ‘Globalization and Commitment in Corporate Social Responsibility: Cross-National Analyses of Institutional and Political-Economy Effects’ (2012) 77(1) American Sociology Review 69–98.Google Scholar
Lim, Chin Leng, Ho, Jean and Paparinskis, Martins. International Investment Law and Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), Chapter 19.Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf. ‘Who Are “the Parties”? Article 31, Paragraph 3(c) of the 1969 Vienna Convention and the “Principle of Systemic Integration” Revisited’ (2008) 55(3) Netherlands International Law Review 343–364.Google Scholar
Lindroos, Anja and Mehling, Michael. ‘Dispelling the Chimera of “Self-Contained Regimes” International Law and the WTO’ (2005) 16(5) European Journal of International Law 857–877.Google Scholar
Llamzon, Aloysius P. Corruption in International Investment Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Chapter 6.Google Scholar
Llamzon, Aloysius P. ‘Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation: The State of the “Unclean Hands” Doctrine in International Investment Law: Yukos as Both Omega and Alpha’ (2015) 30(2) ICSID Review 315–325.Google Scholar
Llamzon, Aloysius and Sinclair, Anthony. ‘Investor Wrongdoing in Investment Arbitration: Standards Governing Issues of Corruption, Fraud, Misrepresentation and Other Investor Misconduct’, in van den Berg, Albert Jan (ed.), Legitimacy: Myths, Realities, Challenges (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2015), 451–530.Google Scholar
Lopez, Carlos. ‘Human Rights Legal Liability for Business Enterprises: The Role of an International Treaty’, in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds.), Building a Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Context and Contours (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 299–317.Google Scholar
Lorz, Ralph Alexander and Busch, Manuel. ‘Investment in Accordance with the Law: Specifically Corruption’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Griebel, Jörn, Hobe, Stephan and Reinisch, August (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015), 577–589.Google Scholar
Loucaides, Loukis. ‘Environmental Protection through the Jurisprudence of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2004) 75(1) British Yearbook of International Law 249–267.Google Scholar
Loutit, Jennifer, Mandelbaum, Jacqueline and Szoke-Burke, Sam. ‘Emerging Practices in Community Development Agreements’ (2016) 7(1) Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy 64–96.Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan. ‘Corporations as International Actors and International Law Makers’ (2004) 13 The Italian Yearbook of International Law 23–38.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, Andreas F. ‘Public Law in the International Arena: Conflict of Laws, International Law, and Some Suggestions for Their Interaction’ (1979-II) 163 Recueil Des Cours 321–428.Google Scholar
Mach, Tomáš. ‘Legitimate Expectations as Part of the FET Standard: An Overview of a Doctrine Shaped by Arbitral Awards in Investor-State Claims’ (2018) ELTE Law Journal 2018/1, 105–121.Google Scholar
MacKay, William R. ‘Parens Patriae as Basis for Provincial Standing in Judicial Review of Federal Decisions’ (2008) 45(4) Alberta Law Review 961–988.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Sorcha. ‘The United Nations, Human Rights and Transnational Corporations: Challenging the International Legal Order’, in Boeger, Nina, Murray, Rachel and Villiers, Charlotte (eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008), 64–84.Google Scholar
Magnus, Ulrich and Martin-Casals, Miquel. ‘Comparative Conclusions’, in Magnus, Ulrich and Martin-Casals, Miquel (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Contributory Negligence (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004), 259–290.Google Scholar
Maheandiran, Bernadette. ‘Calling for Clarity: How Uncertainty Undermines the Legitimacy of the Dispute Resolution System under the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises’ (2015) 20 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 205–244.Google Scholar
Malintoppi, Loretta and Haeri, Hussein. ‘The Non-Disputing State Party in Investment Arbitration: An Interested Player or the Third Man Out?’, in Caron, David D., Schill, Stephan W., Smutny, Abby Cohen and Triantafilou, Epaminontas E. (eds.), Practising Virtue: Inside International Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 565–583.Google Scholar
Mann, Frederick. Further Studies in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), Chapter 14.Google Scholar
Mann, Howard. ‘Investment Agreements and the Regulatory State: Can Exceptions Clauses Create a Safe Haven for Governments?’ (2007) IISD Background Papers for the Developing Country Investment Negotiators’ Forum, 2–23.Google Scholar
Marboe, Irmgard. Calculation of Compensation and Damages in International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), Chapter 3.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle Z. and Hawkins, Jennifer K. ‘Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2012) 3(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 493–507.Google Scholar
Marcoux, Jean-Michel. ‘Transnational Public Policy as an International Practice in Investment Arbitration’ (2019) 10(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 496–515.Google Scholar
Marcoux, Jean-Michel and Bjorklund, Andrea K. ‘Foreign Investors’ Responsibilities and Contributory Fault in Investment Arbitration’ (2020) 69(4) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 877–905.Google Scholar
Marcoux, Jean-Michel and Newcombe, Andrew. ‘Bear Creek Mining Corporation v Republic of Peru: Two Sides of a “Social License” to Operate’ (2018) 33(3) ICSID Review 653–659.Google Scholar
Mares, Radu. ‘Liability within Corporate Groups: Parent Companies’ Accountability for Subsidiary Human Rights Abuses’, in Deva, Surya and Birchall, David (eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Business (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020), 446–470.Google Scholar
Marquais, Olivier. ‘Faute contributive et calcul des dommages dans les arbitrages d’investissement’, Arbitrage International, 9 September 2015.Google Scholar
Márquez, Daniel Iglesias. ‘Legal Avenues for Holding Multinational Corporations Liable for Environmental Damages in a Globalized World’ (2015) 2(3) ARACÊ – Direitos Humanos em Revista 58–74.Google Scholar
Matten, Dirk and Moon, Jeremy. ‘“Implicit” and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility’ (2008) 33(2) Academy of Management Review 404–424.Google Scholar
Mbengue, Makane Moise. ‘Les obligations des investisseurs étrangers’, in Dubin, Laurence, Bodeau-Livinec, Pierre, Iten, Jean-Louis and Tomkiewicz, Vincent (eds.), L’entreprise Multinationale et le droit international (Paris: Pedone, 2017), 295–337.Google Scholar
Mbengue, Makane Moïse and Schacherer, Stefanie. ‘Africa and the Rethinking of International Investment Law about the Elaboration of the Pan-African Investment Code’, in Roberts, Anthea, Stephan, Paul B., Verdier, Pierre-Hugues and Versteeg, Mila (eds.), Comparative International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 547–569.Google Scholar
Mbengue, Makane Moïse and Schacherer, Stefanie. ‘Evolution of International Investment Agreements in Africa: Features and Challenges of Investment Law “Africanization”’, in Chaisse, Julien, Choukroune, Leïla and Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Singapore: Springer, 2021), 2597–2618.Google Scholar
McBarnet, Doreen. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Beyond Law, Through Law, for Law: The New Corporate Accountability’, in McBarnet, Doreen, Voiculescu, Aurora and Campbell, Tom (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 9–56.Google Scholar
McBarnet, Doreen and Kurkchiyan, Marina. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility through Contractual Control? Global Supply Chains and “Other-Regulation”’, in McBarnet, Doreen, Voiculescu, Aurora and Campbell, Tom (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 59–92.Google Scholar
McBarnet, Doreen and Schmidt, Patrick. ‘Corporate Accountability through Creative Enforcement: Human Rights, the Alien Tort Claims Act and the Limits of Legal Impunity’, in McBarnet, Doreen, Voiculescu, Aurora and Campbell, Tom (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 148–176.Google Scholar
McBeth, Adam. ‘Crushed by an Anvil: A Case Study on Responsibility for Human Rights in the Extractive Sector’ (2008) 11(1) Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal 127–166.Google Scholar
McConnaughay, Philip J. ‘Reviving the “Public Law Taboo” in International Conflict of Laws’ (1999) 35(2) Stanford Journal of International Law 255–312.Google Scholar
McCorquodale, Robert. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law’ (2009) 87(2) Journal of Business Ethics 385–400.Google Scholar
McCorquodale, Robert and Smit, Lise. ‘Human Rights, Responsibilities and Due Diligence’, in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds.), Building a Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Context and Contours (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 216–237.Google Scholar
McCrudden, Christopher. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Procurement’, in McBarnet, Doreen, Voiculescu, Aurora and Campbell, Tom (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 93–118.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell. ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’ (2008) 57(2) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 361–401.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell. ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Art 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54(2) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 279–320.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Campbell, Shore, Laurence and Weiniger, Matthew. International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), Chapters 6–7.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Nina A. ‘A Control-Based Approach to Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts’ (2002) 102(5) Columbia Law Review 1203–1303.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. ‘Golden Rules for Transboundary Pollution’ (1997) 46(5) Duke Law Journal 931–1019.Google Scholar
Merrills, John G. ‘Environmental Rights’, in Bodansky, Daniel, Brunnée, Jutta and Hey, Ellen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 663–680.Google Scholar
Miles, Cameron A. ‘Corruption, Jurisdiction and Admissibility in International Investment Claims’ (2012) 3(2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 329–369.Google Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Mitra, Trisha. ‘Relevance of Domestic Court Decisions to the Merits in Investment Arbitration’, in Chaisse, Julien, Choukroune, Leïla and Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Singapore: Springer, 2021), 1103–1121.Google Scholar
Moffat, Kieren, Lacey, Justine, Zhang, Airong and Leipold, Sina. ‘The Social Licence to Operate: A Critical Review’ (2016) 89(5) Forestry 477–488.Google Scholar
Mollengarden, Zachary and Zamir, Noam. ‘The Monetary Gold Principle: Back to Basics’ (2021) 115(1) American Journal of International Law 41–77.Google Scholar
Moloo, Rahim. ‘A Comment on the Clean Hands Doctrine in International Law’ (2010) Inter Alia: University of Durham Student Law Journal 39–51.Google Scholar
Moloo, Rahim and Khachaturian, Alex. ‘The Compliance with the Law Requirement in International Investment Law’ (2011) 34(6) Fordham International Law Journal 1473–1501.Google Scholar
Montt, Santiago. State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Global Constitutional and Administrative Law in the BIT Generation (Oxford: Hart, 2009), Chapters 5–6.Google Scholar
Moore, Christopher W. The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving, 4th ed. (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2014), Part Two.Google Scholar
Moran, Theodore H. ‘The United Nations and Transnational Corporations: A Review and a Perspective’ (2009) 18(2) Transnational Corporations 91–112.Google Scholar
Morgera, Elisa. Corporate Accountability in International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), Chapters 1–3.Google Scholar
Mortenson, Julian Davis. ‘The Travaux of Travaux: Is the Vienna Convention Hostile to Drafting History?’ (2013) 107(4) American Journal of International Law 780–822.Google Scholar
Mosca, Fabrizio and Civera, Chiara. ‘The Evolution of CSR: An Integrated Approach’ (2017) 1 Symphonya 16–35.Google Scholar
Motte-Baumvol, Julia. ‘Le comportement de l’investisseur’, in Ben Hamida, Walid and Coulée, Frédérique (eds.), Convergences et contradictions du droit des investissements et des droits de l’homme: une approche contentieuse (Paris: Pedone, 2017), 197–225.Google Scholar
Mouawad, Caline and Beess und Chrostin, Jessica. ‘The Illegality Objection in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2021) 37(1) Arbitration International 57–95.Google Scholar
Mowery, Lauren A. ‘Earth Rights, Human Rights–Can International Environmental Human Rights Affect Corporate Accountability?’ (2002) 13(2) Fordham Environmental Law Review 343–373.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter. ‘“Caveat Investor”?: The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ (2006) 55(3) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 527–558.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter. ‘Limited Liability and Multinational Enterprises: A Case for Reform?’ (2010) 34(5) Cambridge Journal of Economics 915–928.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter. Multinational Enterprises and the Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), Chapter 1.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter. ‘Towards a Coherent International Investment System: Key Issues in the Reform of International Investment Law’, in Echandi, Roberto and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013) 411–442.Google Scholar
Murphy, Sean D. ‘Counter-Claims Article 80 of the Rules’, in Zimmermann, Andreas, Tams, Christian J., Oellers-Frahm, Karin and Tomuschat, Christian (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 1104–1134.Google Scholar
Mushkat, Roda. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility, International Law, and Business Economics: Convergences and Divergences’ (2012) 12(1) Oregon Review of International Law 55–76.Google Scholar
Nahman, Anton and Antrobus, Geoff. ‘The Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Literature Survey’ (2005) 73(1) South African Journal of Economics 105–120.Google Scholar
Nappert, Sophie. ‘Mammoth Arbitrations: The Yukos Awards of 18 July 2014’ (2015) 12(5) Transnational Dispute Management 1–35.Google Scholar
Nardin, Michel. ‘Is There a Future for Tribunal-Appointed Experts?’ (2019) 37(1) ASA Bulletin 48–63.Google Scholar
Narine, Marcia. ‘Disclosing Disclosure’s Defects: Addressing Corporate Irresponsibility for Human Rights Impacts’ (2015) 47(1) Columbia Human Rights Law Review 84–150.Google Scholar
Nedumpara, James J. and Laddha, Aditya. ‘Human Rights and Environmental Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in Chaisse, Julien, Choukroune, Leïla and Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Singapore: Springer, 2021), 1831–1849.Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew. ‘General Exceptions in International Investment Agreements’, in Segger, Marie-Claire Cordonier, Gehring, Markus W. and Newcombe, Andrew (eds.), Sustainable Development in World Investment Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011), 351–370.Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew. ‘Investor Misconduct: Jurisdiction, Admissibility or Merits?’, in Brown, Chester and Miles, Kate (eds.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 187–200.Google Scholar
Newcombe, Andrew and Marcoux, Jean-Michel. ‘Hesham Talaat M. Al-Warraq v Republic of Indonesia: Imposing International Obligations on Foreign Investors’ (2015) 30(3) ICSID Review 525–532.Google Scholar
Newman, Dwight G. ‘Be Careful What You Wish For: Why Some Versions of “Social Licence” Are Unlicensed and May Be Anti-Social’ (2014) Macdonald-Laurier Institute Publication Commentary 1–9.Google Scholar
Neyret, Laurent. ‘L’affaire Erika: moteur d’évolution des responsabilités civile et pénale’ (2010) 1 Recueil Dalloz 2238–2246.Google Scholar
Nitschke, Frauke. ‘The IBA’s Investor-State Mediation Rules and the ICSID Dispute Settlement Framework’ (2014) 29(1) ICSID Review 112–132.Google Scholar
Nitschke, Frauke. ‘The Proposed ICSID Mediation Rules’ (2021) 17(2) University of St. Thomas Law Journal 422–454.Google Scholar
Nogales, Francisco S. ‘The NAFTA Environmental Framework, Chapter 11 Investment Provisions, and the Environment’ (2002) 8(1) Annual Survey International & Comparative Law 97–149.Google Scholar
Nolan-Haley, Jacqueline. ‘Mediation, Self-Represented Parties, and Access to Justice: Getting There from Here’ (2018) 87 Fordham Law Review Online 1–11.Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred and Januszewski, Karolina Miriam. ‘Non-State Actors and Human Rights’, in Noortmann, Math, Reinisch, August and Ryngaert, Cedric (eds.), Non-State Actors in International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2017), 113–161.Google Scholar
Nowrot, Karsten. ‘Obligation of Investors’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Griebel, Jörn, Hobe, Stephan and Reinisch, August (eds.), International Investment Law (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015), 1154–1185.Google Scholar
Nwauche, Enyinna S. ‘The ECOWAS Community Court of Justice and the Horizontal Application of Human Rights’ (2013) 13(1) African Human Rights Law Journal 30–54.Google Scholar
Obersteiner, Thomas. ‘“In Accordance with Domestic Law” Clauses: How International Investment Tribunals Deal with Allegations of Unlawful Conduct of Investors’ (2014) 31(2) Journal of International Arbitration 265–288.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Clair Methven. ‘The Home State Duty to Regulate the Human Rights Impacts of TNCs Abroad: A Rebuttal’ (2018) 3(1) Business and Human Rights Journal 47–73.Google Scholar
Ogbodo, S. Gozie. ‘An Overview of the Challenges Facing the International Court of Justice in the 21st Century’ (2012) 18(1) Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law 93–114.Google Scholar
Okowa, Phoebe. ‘Issues of Admissibility and the Law on International Responsibility’, in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.), International Law, 5th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 450–483.Google Scholar
Ong, David M. ‘Locating the “Environment” within Corporate Social Responsibility: Continuing Problems of Legal Definition and Representation’, in Boeger, Nina, Murray, Rachel and Villiers, Charlotte (eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008), 186–223.Google Scholar
Ong, David M. ‘Regulating Environmental Responsibility for the Multinational Oil Industry: Continuing Challenges for International Law’ (2015) 11(2) International Journal of Law in Context 153–173.Google Scholar
Orrego Vicuña, Francisco. ‘Interim Report on “The Changing Law of Nationality of Claims”’, Report of the Sixty-Ninth Conference Held in London, 25–29 July 2000, London, International Law Association, 631–648.Google Scholar
Oshionebo, Evaristus. Mineral Mining in Africa: Legal and Fiscal Regimes (London: Routledge, 2021), Chapter 1.Google Scholar
Ostřanský, Josef. ‘An Exercise in Equivocation: A Critique of Legitimate Expectations as a General Principle of Law under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’, in Gattini, Andrea, Tanzi, Attila and Fontanelli, Filippo (eds.), General Principles of Law and International Investment Arbitration (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2018), 344–377.Google Scholar
Owen, John R. and Kemp, Deanna. ‘Social Licence and Mining: A Critical Perspective’ (2013) 38(1) Resources Policy 29–35.Google Scholar
Paine, Joshua. ‘Standard of Review (Investment Arbitration)’, in Fabri, Hélène Ruiz (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Palchetti, Paolo. ‘Litigating Member State Responsibility: The Monetary Gold Principle and the Protection of Absent Organizations’ (2015) 12(2) International Organizations Law Review 468–483.Google Scholar
Palombo, Dalia. ‘The Duty of Care of the Parent Company: A Comparison between French Law, UK Precedents and the Swiss Proposals’ (2019) 4(2) Business and Human Rights Journal 265–286.Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins. ‘Inherent Powers of ICSID Tribunals: Broad and Rightly So’, in Weiler, Todd J. and Laird, Ian A. (eds.), Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law, volume 5 (Huntington, NY: Juris, 2012), 11–42.Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins. The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), Chapters 6, 7, 9.Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins. ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility’ (2013) 24(2) European Journal of International Law 617–647.Google Scholar
Parance, Béatrice. ‘L’influence du droit international de l’environnement sur les entreprises multinationals, à propos de la proposition de loi française relative au devoir de vigilance des entreprises’, in Dubin, Laurence, Bodeau-Livinec, Pierre, Iten, Jean-Louis and Tomkiewicz, Vincent (eds.), L’entreprise multinationale et le droit international (Paris: Pedone, 2017), 279–294.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine. ‘Meta-Regulation: Legal Accountability for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in McBarnet, Doreen, Voiculescu, Aurora and Campbell, Tom (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 207–237.Google Scholar
Parlett, Kate. ‘Parties’ Engagement with Experts in International Litigation’ (2018) 9(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 440–452.Google Scholar
Parra, Antonio R. ‘Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2009) 6(1) Transnational Dispute Management 1–15.Google Scholar
Partiti, Enrico. ‘Polycentricity and Polyphony in International Law: Interpreting the Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights’ (2021) 70(1) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 133–164.Google Scholar
Pathak, Harshad. ‘Consenting to Counterclaims under the ICSID Convention’ (2019) 19(1) Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 101–125.Google Scholar
Pauker, Saar A. ‘Admissibility of Claims in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2018) 34(1) Arbitration International 1–78.Google Scholar
Paulsson, Jan. ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility’, in Aksen, Gerald (ed.), Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner (Paris: ICC Publishing, 2005), 601–617.Google Scholar
Paulsson, Jan and Petrochilos, Georgios. ‘Revision of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: A Report,’ 2006, UNCITRAL Law Library, 347.918 P385.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), Chapter 3.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?’ (2001) 95(3) American Journal of International Law 535–578.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. ‘The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2002) 51(2) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 325–364.Google Scholar
Pearsall, Patrick W. and Heath, J. Benton. ‘Causation and Injury in Investor-State Arbitration’, in Beharry, Christina L. (ed.), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2018), 85–110.Google Scholar
Pellet, Alain. ‘Le Projet d’articles de la C.D.I. sur la protection diplomatique, une codification pour (presque) rien’, in Kohen, Marcelo G. (ed.), Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law, Liber Amicorum Lucius Caflisch (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2006), 1133–1155.Google Scholar
Peloso, Margaret and Hunt, Travis. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting’, in Lindsay, Rae and Martella, Roger (eds.), Corporate Responsibility, Sustainable Business: Environmental, Social and Governance Frameworks for the 21st Century (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2020), 125–172.Google Scholar
Peña, Susana C. Mijares. ‘Human Rights Violations by Canadian Companies Abroad: Choc v Hudbay Minerals Inc.’ (2014) 5(1) Western Journal of Legal Studies 1–19.Google Scholar
Pentikäinen, Merja. ‘Changing International “Subjectivity” and Rights and Obligations under International Law – Status of Corporations’ (2012) 8(1) Utrecht Law Review 145–154.Google Scholar
Peralta, Raúl F. Zúñiga. ‘The Judicialisation of the Social License to Operate: Criteria for International Investment Law’ (2021) 22(1) Journal of World Investment & Trade 92–128.Google Scholar
Percival, Robert V. ‘Liability for Environmental Harm and Emerging Global Environmental Law’ (2010) 25(1) Maryland Journal of International Law 37–63.Google Scholar
Pereira de Andrade, Priscila and Monebhurrun, Nitish. ‘Mapping Investor’s Environmental Commitments and Obligations’, in Ho, Jean and Sattorova, Mavluda (eds.), Investors’ International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2021), 263–290.Google Scholar
Perrone, Nicolás M. ‘The International Investment Regime and Local Populations: Are the Weakest Voices Unheard?’ (2016) 7(3) Transnational Legal Theory 383–405.Google Scholar
Perrone, Nicolás M. ‘Taking Local Expectations Seriously: A Fresh Start for Foreign Investment Governance?’, in Haskell, John D. and Rasulov, Akbar (eds.), New Voices and New Perspectives in International Economic Law (Cham: Springer, 2020), 113–131.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne. ‘Corruption as a Violation of International Human Rights’ (2018) 29(4) European Journal of International Law 1251–1287.Google Scholar
Peterson, Luke Eric and Gray, Kevin R. ‘International Human Rights in Bilateral Investment Treaties and in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2003) A Research Paper Prepared by the IISD for the Swiss Department of Foreign Affairs, available at: www.iisd.org/publications/pub.aspx?id=577.Google Scholar
Pigrau, Antoni, Borràs, Susana, Manzano, Jordi Jariai and Cardesa-Salzmann, Antonio. ‘Legal Avenues for EJOs to Claim Environmental Liability’ (2012) 4 Environmental Justice Organisation Liabilities and Trade Report 1–98.Google Scholar
Pomson, Ori. ‘Does the Monetary Gold Principle Apply to International Courts and Tribunals Generally?’ (2019) 10(1) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 88–125.Google Scholar
Pomson, Ori and Horowitz, Yonatan. ‘Humanitarian Intervention and the Clean Hands Doctrine in International Law’ (2015) 48(2) Israel Law Review 219–252.Google Scholar
Popova, Ina C. and Poon, Fiona. ‘From Perpetual Respondent to Aspiring Counterclaimant? State Counterclaims in the New Wave of Investment Treaties’ (2015) 2(2) BCDR International Arbitration Review 223–260.Google Scholar
Porterfield, Matthew C. ‘Exhaustion of Local Remedies in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?’ (2015) 41 Yale Journal of International Law Online 1–11.Google Scholar
Potestà, Michele. ‘Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Understanding the Roots and the Limits of a Controversial Concept’ (2013) 28(1) ICSID Review 88–122.Google Scholar
Potestà, Michele and Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle. ‘Can the Mauritius Convention Serve as a Model for the Reform of Investor-State Arbitration in Connection with the Introduction of a Permanent Investment Tribunal or an Appeal Mechanism? – Analysis and Roadmap’, 2016, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3455511.Google Scholar
Poulton, Ed, Kryvoi, Yarik, Finkel, Ekaterina and Bednarz, Janek. ‘Empirical Study: Corporate Restructuring and Investment Treaty Protections’, BIICL and Baker McKenzie, 2020, available at: www.biicl.org/documents/89_biicl-baker-mckenzie-corporate-restructuring-and-investment-treaty-protections-2020.pdf.Google Scholar
Puig, Sergio and Shaffer, Gregory. ‘Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law’ (2018) 112(3) American Journal of International Law 361–409.Google Scholar
Puma, Giuseppe. ‘Human Rights and Investment Law: Attempts at Harmonization through a Difficult Dialogue between Arbitrators and Human Rights Tribunals’, in Arcari, Maurizio and Balmond, Louis (eds.), Judicial Dialogue in the International Legal Order: Between Pluralism and Legal Certainty (Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica, 2014), 193–243.Google Scholar
Radi, Yannick. ‘The “Human Nature” of International Investment Law’ (2013) 10(1) Transnational Dispute Management 1–26.Google Scholar
Ramasastry, Anita. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility versus Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Gap between Responsibility and Accountability’ (2015) 14(2) Journal of Human Rights 237–259.Google Scholar
Ranjan, Prabhash. ‘Investor Obligations in Investment Treaties: Missing Text or a Matter of Application?’, in Ho, Jean and Sattorova, Mavluda (eds.), Investors’ International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2021), 125–149.Google Scholar
Ranjan, Prabhash and Anand, Pushkar. ‘The 2016 Model Indian Bilateral Investment Treaty: A Critical Deconstruction’ (2017) 38(1) Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 1–54.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R. ‘Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility’ (2001) 111(3) Yale Law Journal 443–545.Google Scholar
Redgwell, Catherine. ‘Life, The Universe and Everything: A Critique of Anthropocentric Rights’, in Boyle, Alan and Anderson, Michael R. (eds.), Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), 71–87.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August. ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility in International Investment Law’ (2017) 16(1) The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 21–43.Google Scholar
Reinisch, August. ‘Will the EU’s Proposal Concerning an Investment Court System for CETA and TTIP Lead to Enforceable Awards?: The Limits of Modifying the ICSID Convention and the Nature of Investment Arbitration’ (2016) 19(4) Journal of International Economic Law 761–786.Google Scholar
Reisman, Diana A. A. ‘Apportioning Fault for Performance Corruption in Investment Arbitration’ (2021) 37(1) Arbitration International 1–19.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael. ‘International Investment Arbitration and ADR: Married but Best Living Apart’ (2009) 24(1) ICSID Review 185–192.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael. ‘The Regime for Lacunae in the ICSID Choice of Law Provision and the Question of Its Threshold’ (2000) 15(2) ICSID Review 362–381.Google Scholar
Renneboog, Luc, Ter Horst, Jenke and Zhang, Chendi. ‘Socially Responsible Investment Funds’, in Aras, Güler and Crowther, David (eds.), A Handbook of Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility (Farnham: Gower, 2010), 395–412.Google Scholar
Ripinsky, Sergey and Williams, Kevin. Damages in International Investment Law (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2008), Chapter 8.Google Scholar
Risso, Giorgio and Amato, Anna Chiara. ‘Pleas of Illegality and the Application of Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2020) 9(1) Cambridge International Law Journal 96–116.Google Scholar
Rivas, José Antonio. ‘ICSID Treaty Counterclaims: Case Law and Treaty Evolution’ (2014) 11(1) Transnational Dispute Management 1–45.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea. ‘Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System’ (2013) 107(1) American Journal of International Law 45–94.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea. ‘Incremental, Systemic and Paradigmatic Reform of Investor-State Arbitration’ (2018) 112(3) American Journal of International Law 410–432.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea. ‘Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States’ (2010) 104(2) American Journal of International Law 179–225.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? (Washington, DC: Institute of International Economics, 1997), Chapter 5.Google Scholar
Roe, Thomas and Happold, Matthew. Settlement of Investment Disputes under the Energy Charter Treaty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), Chapter 3.Google Scholar
Rolland, Sonia E. and Trubek, David M. ‘Legal Innovation in Investment Law: Rhetoric and Practice in the South’ (2017) 39(2) University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 355–434.Google Scholar
Roorda, Lucas and Ku, Julian G. ‘Applying International Law to Corporations: The Limits to the Lessons Offered by the United States Experience with the Alien Tort Statute’, in Ho, Jean and Sattorova, Mavluda (eds.), Investors’ International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2021), 213–234.Google Scholar
Roorda, Lucas and Leader, Daniel Leader. ‘Okpabi v Shell and Four Nigerian Farmers v Shell: Parent Company Liability Back in Court’ (2021) 6(2) Business and Human Rights Journal 368–376.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. ‘Judicial Independence and Corruption’, in Transparency International (ed.), Global Corruption Report 2007: Corruption in Judicial Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 15–24.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Kim. ‘Practical and Innovative Use of Experts’ (2018–2019) 13(4) Construction Law International 20–26.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Friedrich. ‘Arbitral Praeliminaria – Reflections on the Distinction between Admissibility and Jurisdiction after BG v. Argentina’ (2016) 29(1) Leiden Journal of International Law 137–154.Google Scholar
Rudall, Jason. ‘The Tribunal with a Toolbox: On Perenco v Ecuador, Black Gold and Shades of Green’ (2020) 11(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 485–500.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. ‘Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda’, (2007) 101(4) American Journal of International Law 819–840.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (New York: W. W. Norton, 2013), Chapter Two.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. ‘Multinationals as Global Institution: Power, Authority and Relative Autonomy’ (2018) 12(3) Regulation & Governance 317–333.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. Obstacles to Justice and Redress for Victims of Corporate Human Rights Abuse (Oxford: Oxford Pro Bono Publico, 2008), Introduction.Google Scholar
Rühmkorf, Andreas. Corporate Social Responsibility, Private Law and Global Supply Chains: Corporations, Globalisation and the Law series (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2015), Chapter 5.Google Scholar
Rusk, Dean. ‘A Comment on Filartiga v. Pena-Irala’ (1981) 11(2) Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 311–316.Google Scholar
Sabahi, Borzu. Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration: Principles and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), Chapter 7.Google Scholar
Sabahi, Borzu and Duggal, Kabir. ‘Occidental Petroleum v Ecuador (2012): Observations on Proportionality, Assessment of Damages and Contributory Fault’ (2013) 28(2) ICSID Review 279–290.Google Scholar
Sabahi, Borzu, Duggal, Kabir and Birch, Nicholas. ‘Principles Limiting the Amount of Compensation’, in Beharry, Christina L. (eds.), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2018), 325–346.Google Scholar
Sachs, Klaus and Schmidt-Ahrendts, Nils. ‘Protocol on Expert Teaming: A New Approach to Expert Evidence’, in van den Berg, Albert Jan (ed.), Arbitration Advocacy in Changing Times (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011), 135–148.Google Scholar
Sachs, Noah M. ‘Beyond the Liability Wall: Strengthening Tort Remedies in International Environmental Law’ (2008) 55(4) UCLA Law Review 837–904.Google Scholar
Sadowski, Wojciech. ‘Yukos and Contributory Fault’ (2015) 12(5) Transnational Dispute Management 1–36.Google Scholar
Salas-Fouksmann, Olivier. ‘Corporate Liability of Energy/Natural Resources Companies at National Law for Breach of International Human Rights Norms’ (2013) 2(1) UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 201–229.Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe, Peel, Jacqueline, Fabra, Adriana and MacKenzie, Ruth. Principles of International Environmental Law, 4th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), Chapter 5.Google Scholar
Sanger, Andrew. ‘Transnational Corporate Responsibility in Domestic Courts: Still Out of Reach?’ (2019) 113 American Journal International Law Unbound 4–9.Google Scholar
Sasson, Monique. Substantive Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration: The Unsettled Relationship between International and Municipal Law, 2nd ed. (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2017), Introduction, Chapters 1, 4, 6.Google Scholar
Sattorova, Mavluda. ‘The Foreign Investor as a Good Citizen: Investor Obligations to do Good’, in Ho, Jean and Sattorova, Mavluda (eds.), Investors’ International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2021), 45–69.Google Scholar
Sauvant, Karl P. ‘The Negotiations of the United Nations Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations: Experience and Lessons Learned’ (2015) 16(1) Journal of World Investment & Trade 11–87.Google Scholar
Sauvant, Karl P. and Güneş, Ünüvar, ‘Can Host Countries Have Legitimate Expectations?’ (2016) 183 Columbia FDI Perspectives 1–4.Google Scholar
Savadogo, Louis. ‘Le recours des juridictions internationales à des experts’ (2004) 50 Annuaire français de droit international 231–258.Google Scholar
Schepel, Harm. The Constitution of Private Governance: Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets (Oxford: Hart, 2005), Chapters 1, 10.Google Scholar
Scherer, Maxi, Bruce, Stuart and Reschke, Juliane. ‘Environmental Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2021) 36(2) ICSID Review 413–440.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W. ‘Deference in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Re-conceptualizing the Standard of Review’ (2012) 3(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 577–607.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W. ‘“Fair and Equitable Treatment” as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law’, in Hofmann, Rainer and Tams, Christian (eds.), The International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID): Taking Stock after 40 Years (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2007), 31–72.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W. ‘General Principles of Law and International Investment Law’, in Gazzini, Tarcisio and Brabandere, Eric De (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2018), 133–181.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W. ‘Illegal Investments in International Arbitration’ (2012) 11(2) The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 281–323.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W. ‘Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement: A (Comparative and International) Constitutional Law Framework’ (2017) 20(3) Journal of International Economic Law 649–672.Google Scholar
Schill, Stephan W. and Djanic, Vladislav. ‘International Investment Law and Community Interests’, in Benvenisti, Eyal and Nolte, Georg (eds.), Community Interests Across International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 221–248.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Rudolf B. ‘Research on the General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations’ (1957) 51(4) American Journal of International Law 734–753.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph H. ‘Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2014) 1(1) McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution 1–25.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph H. ‘Why Still ICSID?’ (2012) 9(3) Transnational Dispute Management 1–7.Google Scholar
Schreuer, Christoph H., Malintoppi, Loretta, Reinisch, August and Sinclair, Anthony. The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), Articles 42, 46.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Gary T. ‘Contributory and Comparative Negligence: A Reappraisal’ (1978) 87(4) Yale Law Journal 697–727.Google Scholar
Scott, Craig. ‘Multinational Enterprises and Emergent Jurisprudence on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, in Eide, Asbjørn, Krause, Catarina and Rosas, Allan (eds.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook, 2nd ed. (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 2001), 563–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seck, Sara L. and Ogunranti, Akinwumi. ‘Accountability: Legal Risks and Remedies’, in Lindsay, Rae and Martella, Roger (eds.), Corporate Responsibility, Sustainable Business: Environmental, Social and Governance Frameworks for the 21st Century (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2020), 587–609.Google Scholar
Seif, Isabella. ‘Business and Human Rights in International Investment Law: Empirical Evidence’, in Chaisse, Julien, Choukroune, Leïla and Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Singapore: Springer, 2021), 1759–1782.Google Scholar
Senogles, Geoffrey. ‘Some Views from the Crucible: The Perspective of an Expert Witness on the Adversarial Principle’ (2018) 9(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamir, Ronen. ‘Between Self-Regulation and the Alien Tort Claims Act: On the Contested Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility’ (2004) 38(4) Law & Society Review 635–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, Wenhua and Feng, Yunya. ‘A Trinity Analytical Framework for ISDS Reform’ (2018) 112 American Journal of International Law Unbound 244–248.Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval. ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility’, in Romano, Cesare P. R., Alter, Karen J. and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 779–805.Google Scholar
Shao, Xuan. ‘Environmental and Human Rights Counterclaims in International Investment Arbitration: At the Crossroads of Domestic and International Law’ (2021) 24(1) Journal of International Economic Law 157–179.Google Scholar
Sharma, Rajesh. ‘Mediation of Investor-State Disputes: Should It Be Transparent?’ (2020) 13(2) Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 349–364.Google Scholar
Sharma, Uma Jitendra. ‘What’s Past Is Prologue: Revisiting Proportionality in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2018–2019) 36 Singapore Law Review 152–185.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Jeremy K. and Jacob, Marc. ‘Counterclaims and State Claims’, in Beharry, Christina L. (ed.), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2018), 347–368.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah. ‘Human Rights, Environmental Rights, and the Right to Environment’, (1991) 28(1) Stanford Journal of International Law 103–138.Google Scholar
Sherman, III, John, F. ‘Beyond CSR: The Story of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’, in Lindsay, Rae and Martella, Roger (eds.), Corporate Responsibility, Sustainable Business: Environmental, Social and Governance Frameworks for the 21st Century (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2020), 473–503.Google Scholar
Shihata, Ibrahim F. I. and Parra, Antonio R. ‘The Experience of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes’ (1999) 14(2) ICSID Review 299–361.Google Scholar
Shirlow, Esmé. ‘Investor-State Arbitration Meets Mediation: Potential Problems?’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 30 September 2020.Google Scholar
Shirlow, Esmé. Judging at the Interface: Deference to State Decision-Making Authority in International Adjudication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021), Chapters 4, 5.Google Scholar
Shrivastava, Ankur. ‘Category-wise Analysis of Awarded Cases Related to Compensation to the Bhopal Gas Victims’, Legal Services India, available at: www.legalservicesindia.com/article/750/Category-wise-Analysis-of-Awarded-Cases-related-to-compensation-to-the-Bhopal-Gas-Victims.html.Google Scholar
Shue, Henry. Basic Rights, 2nd ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996), Chapter 2.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno. ‘Foreign Investment Arbitration: A Place for Human Rights?’ (2011) 60(3) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 573–596.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno. ‘Self-Contained Regimes’ (1985) 26 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 111–136.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno and Pulkowski, Dirk. ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-contained Regimes in International Law’ (2006) 17(3) European Journal of International Law 483–529.Google Scholar
Simmons, Joshua B. ‘Valuation in Investor-State Arbitration: Toward a More Exact Science’ (2012) 30(1) Berkeley Journal of International Law 196–250.Google Scholar
Simons, Penelope. ‘The Value-Added of a Treaty to Regulate Transnational Corporations’, in Deva, Surya and Bilchitz, David (eds.), Building a Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Context and Contours (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 48–78.Google Scholar
Skinner, Gwynne. ‘Beyond Kiobel: Providing Access to Judicial Remedies for Corporate Accountability for Violations of International Human Rights Norms by Transnational Corporations in a New (Post-Kiobel) World’ (2014) 46(1) Columbia Human Rights Law Review 158–265.Google Scholar
Skinner, Gwynne. ‘Parent Company Accountability: Ensuring Justice for Human Rights Violations’, The International Corporate Accountability Roundtable, 2015, available at: www.bhrinlaw.org/documents/pcap-report-2015.pdf.Google Scholar
Skinner, Gwynne, McCorquodale, Robert and Shutter, Olivier De. ‘The Third Pillar. Access to Judicial Remedies for Human Rights Violations by Transnational Business’, ICAR-CORE-ECCJ, December 2013.Google Scholar
Sloss, David. ‘Treaty Enforcement in Domestic Courts: A Comparative Analysis’, in Sloss, David (ed.), The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 1-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloss, David. ‘Using International Court of Justice Advisory Opinions to Adjudicate Secessionist Claims’ (2001) 42(2) Santa Clara Law Review 357–390.Google Scholar
Sloss, David and Van Alstine, Michael. ‘International Law in Domestic Courts’, in Sandholtz, Wayne and Whytock, Christopher A. (eds.), Research Handbook on the Politics of International Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017), 79–115.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, Elizabeth. ‘Protecting Investors’ Legitimate Expectations – Recognizing and Delimiting a General Principle’ (2006) 21(1) ICSID Review 1–58.Google Scholar
Söderlund, Christer and Burova, Elena. ‘Is There Such a Thing as Admissibility in Investment Arbitration?’ (2018) 33(2) ICSID Review 525–559.Google Scholar
Sohn, Louis B. and Baxter, R. R. ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries to the Economic Interests of Aliens: II. Draft Convention on the International Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens’ (1961) 55(3) American Journal of International Law 548–584.Google Scholar
Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy. The International Law on Foreign Investment, 4th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017), Chapters 1–4, 8.Google Scholar
Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy. Resistance and Change in the International Law on Foreign Investment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), Chapters 1, 5–7.Google Scholar
Spar, Debora. ‘Foreign Investment and Human Rights’ (1999) 42(1) Challenge 55–80.Google Scholar
Sparks, Tom. ‘Reassessing State Consent to Jurisdiction: The Indispensable Third Party Principle before the ICJ’ (2020) Max Planck Institute, MPIL Research Paper Series No. 2020-22.Google Scholar
Spears, Suzanne A. ‘Corporate Responsibility and National and International Legal Frameworks’, in Lindsay, Rae and Martella, Roger (eds.), Corporate Responsibility, Sustainable Business: Environmental, Social and Governance Frameworks for the 21st Century (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2020), 557–586.Google Scholar
Spears, Suzanne A. ‘The Quest for Policy Space in a New Generation of International Investment Agreements’ (2010) 13(4) Journal of International Economic Law 1037–1075.Google Scholar
Spieler, Paula. ‘The La Oroya Case: The Relationship between Environmental Degradation and Human Rights Violations’ (2010) 18(1) Human Rights Brief 19–23.Google Scholar
Spiermann, Ole. ‘Applicable Law’, in Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Federico and Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 89–118.Google Scholar
St John, Taylor. The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration: Politics, Law, and Unintended Consequences (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), Chapter 8.Google Scholar
Steiner, Richard. ‘Double Standard: Shell Practices in Nigeria Compared with International Standards to Prevent and Control Pipeline Oil Spills and the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill’, Friends of the Earth Netherlands, November 2010, available at: www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/20101109-rapport-Double-Standard.pdf.Google Scholar
Steingruber, Andrea Marco. ‘Antoine Goetz and others v Republic of Burundi: Consent and Arbitral Tribunal Competence to Hear Counterclaims in Treaty-Based ICSID Arbitrations’ (2013) 28(2) ICSID Review 291–300.Google Scholar
Steingruber, Andrea Marco. ‘Some Remarks on Veijo Heiskanen’s Note “Ménage à trois? Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Competence in Investment Treaty Arbitration”’ (2014) 29(3) ICSID Review 675–689.Google Scholar
Steinitz, Maya. The Case for an International Court of Civil Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Stephens, Beth. ‘Corporate Liability: Enforcing Human Rights through Domestic Litigation’ (2001) 24(3) Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 401–414.Google Scholar
Stephens, Beth. ‘Translating Filártiga: A Comparative and International Law Analysis of Domestic Remedies for International Human Rights Violations’ (2002) 27(1) Yale Journal of International Law 1–58.Google Scholar
Stephens-Chu, Gisele. ‘Is It Always All about the Money? The Appropriateness of Non-Pecuniary Remedies in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2014) 30(4) Arbitration International 661–686.Google Scholar
Stern, David, Common, Michael S. and Barbier, Edward. ‘Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation: The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Sustainable Development’ (1996) 24(7) World Development 1151–1160.Google Scholar
Stern, Marc J. ‘Coercion, Voluntary Compliance and Protest: The Role of Trust and Legitimacy in Combating Local Opposition to Protected Areas’ (2008) 35(3) Environmental Conservation 200–210.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. ‘Investor-State Arbitration: Proportionality’s New Frontier’ (2010) 4(1) Law & Ethics of Human Rights 46–76.Google Scholar
Stoyanova, Vladislava. ‘Common Law Tort of Negligence as a Tool for Deconstructing Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2019) 24(5) International Journal of Human Rights 632–655.Google Scholar
Strebel, Felix D. ‘The Enforcement of Foreign Judgements and Foreign Public Law’ (1999) 21(1) Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal 55–130.Google Scholar
Strong, Stacie I. ‘Third Party Intervention and Joinder as of Right in International Arbitration: An Infringement of Individual Contract Rights or a Proper Equitable Measure?’ (1998) 31(4) Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 915–996.Google Scholar
Šturma, Pavel. ‘Public Goods and International Investment Law: Does the New Generation of IIAs Better Protect Human Rights?’ (2018) 1 Brill Open Law 5–15.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Rory and Hachez, Nicolas. ‘Human Rights Norms for Business: The Missing Piece of the Ruggie Jigsaw – The Case of Institutional Investors’, in Mares, Radu (ed.), The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Foundations and Implementation (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012), 217–244.Google Scholar
Susskind, Lawrence. ‘Environmental Mediation and the Accountability Problem’ (1981) 6(1) Vermont Law Review 1–48.Google Scholar
Svoboda, Ondřej. ‘Coming of Age: The System of OECD 1 National Contact Points for Responsible 2 Business Conduct in Its 20 Years’, in Bungenberg, Marc et al. (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law, volume 11 (Berlin: Springer, 2020), 31–54.Google Scholar
Svoboda, Ondřej. ‘Investors’ Responsibilities beyond Investment Treaties: A Workaround to Balance the Investment Protection Regime’ (2020) 11 Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law 462–474.Google Scholar
Symeonides, Symeon C. Codifying Choice of Law Around the World: An International Comparative Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Chapter 2.Google Scholar
Tams, Christian J. Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), Chapter 1.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Yoshifumi. The Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), Chapter 7.Google Scholar
Taylor, Prudence E. ‘From Environmental to Ecological Human Rights: A New Dynamic in International Law?’ (1998) 10(2) Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 309–398.Google Scholar
Thi-Huyen Dinh, Trang, Vo, Duc Hong, Vo, Anh The and Nguyen, Thang Cong. ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in the Short Run and Long Run: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries’ (2019) 12(4) Journal of Risk and Financial Management 176–187.Google Scholar
Thienel, Tobias. ‘Third States and the Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice: The Monetary Gold Principle’ (2014) 57 German Yearbook of International Law 322–353.Google Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh. ‘The International Court of Justice’, in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.), International Law, 5th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 573–600.Google Scholar
Thomas, Margaret S. ‘Parens Patriae and the States’ Historic Police Power’ (2016) 69(4) SMU Law Review 759–810.Google Scholar
Titi, Catharine. ‘Mediation and the Settlement of International Investment Disputes: Between Utopia and Realism’, in Titi, Catharine and Gómez, Katia Fach (eds.), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 21–38.Google Scholar
Toope, Stephen J. ‘Formality and Informality’, in Hey, Ellen, Brunnée, Jutta and Bodansky, Daniel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 107–124.Google Scholar
Toope, Stephen J. Mixed International Arbitration: Studies in Arbitration between States and Private Persons (Cambridge: Grotius, 1990), Chapter III.Google Scholar
Toral, Mehmet and Schultz, Thomas. ‘The State, a Perpetual Respondent in Investment Arbitration? Some Unorthodox Considerations’, in Waibel, Michael, Kaushal, Asha, Chung, Kyo-Hwa and Balchin, Claire (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009), 577–602.Google Scholar
Tudor, Ioana. The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in the International Law of Foreign Investment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), Chapter 7.Google Scholar
Tully, Stephen (ed.). International Documents on Corporate Responsibility (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005), Chapter 2.Google Scholar
Uff, Alexander. ‘La réparation du dommage et la place du règlement transactionnel, point de vue des praticiens’, in Dubin, Laurence, Bodeau-Livinec, Pierre, Iten, Jean-Louis and Tomkiewicz, Vincent (eds.), L’entreprise multinationale et le droit international (Paris: Pedone, 2017), 483–507.Google Scholar
Urdaneta, Juan Felipe Merizalde. ‘Proportionality, Contributory Negligence and Other Equity Considerations in Investment Arbitration’, in Weiler, Todd J. and Laird, Ian A. (eds.), Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law, volume 8 (Huntington, NY: Juris, 2015), 301–325.Google Scholar
Uribe, Mariano de Alba. ‘Drawing the Line: Addressing Allegations of Unclean Hands in Investment Arbitration’ (2015) 12(1) Brazilian Journal of International Law 322–338.Google Scholar
Vadi, Valentina. ‘The Migration of Constitutional Ideas to Regional and International Economic Law: The Case of Proportionality’ (2015) 35(3) Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 557–589.Google Scholar
Vagts, Detlev F. ‘The Multinational Enterprise: A New Challenge for Transnational Law’ (1970) 83(4) Harvard Law Review 739–792.Google Scholar
Valderrama, Carlos José. ‘Investor-State Dispute Prevention: The Perspective of Peru’, in Titi, Catherine (ed.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law Special Issue: Public Actors in International Investment Law (Berlin: Springer, 2021), 117–133.Google Scholar
Vallat, Julie. ‘Les apports de la responsabilité sociétale des entreprises (RSE), point de vue des enterprises’, in Dubin, Laurence, Bodeau-Livinec, Pierre, Iten, Jean-Louis and Tomkiewicz, Vincent (eds.), L’entreprise multinationale et le droit international (Paris: Pedone, 2017), 477–482.Google Scholar
van Aaken, Anne and Lehmann, Tobias. ‘Sustainable Development and International Investment Law: An Harmonious View from Economics’, in Echandi, Roberto and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 317–339.Google Scholar
van den Beukel, Jilles and Geuns, Lucia van. ‘Groningen Gas: The Loss of a Social License to Operate’ (2019) Hague Centre for Strategic Studies 1–21.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, Paul F. et al. (eds.), ‘3 Inter-American Court of Human Rights: The Standing of Legal Entities in the Inter-American Human Rights System, Advisory Opinion OC-22/16, 26 February 2016’ (2017) 3 International Labor Rights Case Law 29–38.Google Scholar
van Dam, Cees. ‘Tort Law and Human Rights: Brothers in Arms on the Role of Tort Law in the Area of Business and Human Rights’ (2011) 2(3) Journal of European Tort Law 221–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Damme, Isabelle. ‘The Assessment of Expert Evidence in International Adjudication’ (2018) 9(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement 401–410.Google Scholar
Van Harten, Gus. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), Chapter I.Google Scholar
Van Harten, Gus, and Loughlin, Martin. ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law’ (2006) 17(1) European Journal of International Law 121–150.Google Scholar
Van Harten, Gus, Kelsey, Jane and Schneiderman, David. ‘Phase 2 of the UNCITRAL ISDS Review: Why “Other Matters” Really Matter’ (2019) Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper 1–15.Google Scholar
Van Loo, Relinde. ‘The Rise and Fall of the Dutch Groningen Gas Field’, E&C Consultants, 16 August 2018, available at: www.eecc.eu/blog/groningen-gas-field.Google Scholar
Van Putten, Ingrid E., Cvitanovic, Christopher, Fulton, Elizabeth, Lacey, Justine and Kelly, Rachel. ‘The Emergence of Social Licence Necessitates Reforms in Environmental Regulation’ (2018) 23(3) Ecology and Society 1–11.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Kenneth J. ‘Sustainable Liberalism and the International Investment Regime’ (1998) 19(2) Michigan Journal International Law 373–399.Google Scholar
Vastardis, Anil Yilmaz and Chambers, Rachel. ‘Overcoming the Corporate Veil Challenge: Could Investment Law Inspire the Proposed Business and Human Rights Treaty?’ (2018) 67(2) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 389–423.Google Scholar
Vaypan, Grigory. ‘Choosing among the Shades of Nuance: The Discourse of Proportionality in International Law’ (2015) 15(2) Global Jurist 237–259.Google Scholar
Vázquez, Carlos Manuel. ‘Alien Tort Claims and the Status of Customary International Law’ (2012) 106(3) American Journal of International Law 531–546.Google Scholar
Vázquez, Carlos Manuel. ‘Choice-of-Law as Geographic Scope Limitation’, in Giorgetti, Chiara and Klein, Natalie (eds.), Resolving Conflicts in the Law: Essays in Honour of Lea Brilmayer (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2020), 42–77.Google Scholar
Vázquez, Carlos Manuel. ‘Customary International Law as U.S. Law: A Critique of the Revisionist and Intermediate Positions and a Defense of the Modern Position’ (2011) 86(4) Notre Dame Law Review 1495–1634.Google Scholar
Vázquez, Carlos Manuel. ‘Direct vs. Indirect Obligations of Corporations under International Law’ (2005) 43(3) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 927–960.Google Scholar
Vázquez, Carlos Manuel. ‘Jurisdiction and Choice of Law for Non-Contractual Obligations Part I: Hemispheric Approaches to Jurisdiction and Applicable Law for Non-Contractual Civil Liability’, Organization of American States Permanent Council 62nd Regular Session, Rio de Janeiro, 10–21 March 2003.Google Scholar
Verbist, Herman. ‘Mediation as an Alternative Method to Settle Investor-State Disputes’, in Chaisse, Julien, Choukroune, Leïla and Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Singapore: Springer, 2021), 759–786.Google Scholar
Vermeer-Künzli, A. ‘As If: The Legal Fiction in Diplomatic Protection’ (2007) 18(1) European Journal of International Law 37–68.Google Scholar
Viñuales, Jorge E. ‘International Investment Law and Natural Resource Governance’ (2015) E15Initiative. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum, 2015. www.e15initiative.org/ (accessed 15 December 2021).Google Scholar
Viñuales, Jorge E. ‘Investor Diligence in Investment Arbitration: Sources and Arguments’ (2017) 32(2) ICSID Review 346–370.Google Scholar
Viñuales, Jorge E. Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), Chapters 1, 5.Google Scholar
Virgo, Graham. ‘Whose Conscience? Unconscionability in the Common Law of Obligations’, in Robertson, Andrew and Tilbury, Michael (eds.), Divergencies in Private Law (Oxford: Hart, 2016), 293–320.Google Scholar
Vohryzek-Griest, Ana. ‘State Counterclaims in Investor-State Disputes: A History of 30 Years of Failure’ (2009) 15 International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional 83–124.Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, Armin and Venzke, Ingo. In Whose Name?: A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), Chapter 4.Google Scholar
von Kumberg, Wolf, Lack, Jeremy and Leathes, Michael. ‘Enabling Early Settlement in Investor-State Arbitration: The Time to Introduce Mediation Has Come’ (2014) 29(1) ICSID Review 133–141.Google Scholar
von Staden, Andreas. ‘Deference or No Deference, That Is the Question: Legitimacy and Standards of Review in Investor-State Arbitration’, Investment Treaty News, 19 July 2012.Google Scholar
von Staden, Andreas. ‘The Democratic Legitimacy of Judicial Review beyond the State: Normative Subsidiarity and Judicial Standards of Review’ (2012) 10(4) International Journal of Constitutional Law 1023–1049.Google Scholar
von Wobeser, Claus. ‘The Arbitral Tribunal-Appointed Expert’ (2007) 4(3) Transnational Dispute Management 1–11.Google Scholar
Vurro, Clodia. ‘The Evolutionary Path of the Concept of CSR’, in Perrini, Francesco, Pogutz, Stefano and Tencati, Antonio (eds.), Developing Corporate Social Responsibility: A European Perspective (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006), 54–71.Google Scholar
Wagner, Markus. ‘Regulatory Space in International Trade Law and International Investment Law’ (2014) 36(1) University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 1–87.Google Scholar
Waibel, Michael. ‘Investment Arbitration: Jurisdiction and Admissibility’, in Bungenberg, Marc, Griebel, Jörn, Hobe, Stephan and Reinisch, August (eds.), International Investment Law: A Handbook (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015), 1212–1287.Google Scholar
Wälde, Thomas W. ‘Efficient Management of Transnational Disputes: Mutual Gain by Mediation or Joint Loss in Litigation’ (2006) 22(2) Arbitration International 205–232.Google Scholar
Wälde, Thomas W. ‘Pro-Active Mediation of International Business and Investment Disputes Involving Long-Term Contracts: From Zero-Sum Litigation to Efficient Dispute Management’ (2004) 1(2) Transnational Dispute Management 1–10.Google Scholar
Wälde, Thomas and Kolo, Abba. ‘Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and “Regulatory Taking” in International Law’ (2001) 50(4) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 811–848.Google Scholar
Ward, Halina. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Law and Policy’, in Boeger, Nina, Murray, Rachel and Villiers, Charlotte (eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008), 8–38.Google Scholar
Ward, Halina. ‘Legal Issues in Corporate Citizenship’ (2003) Paper Prepared for the Swedish Partnership for Global Responsibility, available at: https://pubs.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/16000IIED.pdf.Google Scholar
Ward, Peter. ‘Tort Cause of Action’ (1956) 42(1) Cornell Law Review 28–58.Google Scholar
Webb, Philippa, ‘Forum non conveniens: Recent Developments at the Intersection of Public and Private International Law’, in Giorgetti, Chiara and Klein, Natalie (eds.), Resolving Conflicts in the Law: Essays in Honour of Lea Brilmayer (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2020), 78–97.Google Scholar
Weeramantry, Romesh and Chang, Brian. ‘Investor-State Conciliation and Mediation’ (2021) Oxford Bibliography Online 1–25.Google Scholar
Wehland, Hanno. ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility in Proceedings under the ICSID Convention and the ICSID Additional Facility Rules’, in Baltag, Crina (ed.), ICSID Convention after 50 Years: Unsettled Issues (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2017), 227–247.Google Scholar
Weil, Prosper. ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?’ (1983) 77(3) American Journal of International Law 413–442.Google Scholar
Weiler, Todd. ‘Balancing Human Rights and Investor Protection: A New Approach for a Different Legal Order’ (2004) 27(2) Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 429–452.Google Scholar
Weissbrodt, David and Kruger, Muria. ‘Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights’ (2003) 97(4) American Journal of International Law 901–922.Google Scholar
Welsh, Nancy A. and Schneider, Andrea K. ‘The Thoughtful Integration of Mediation into Bilateral Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2013) 18 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 71–144.Google Scholar
Wettstein, Florian. Multinational Corporations and Global Justice: Human Rights Obligations of a Quasi-Governmental Institution (Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books, 2009), Part III.Google Scholar
Whitsitt, Elizabeth and Bankes, Nigel. ‘The Evolution of International Investment Law and Its Application to the Energy Sector’ (2013) 51(2) Alberta Law Review 207–247.Google Scholar
Wildhaber, Luzius. ‘Some Aspects of the Transnational Corporation in International Law’ (1980) 27(1) Netherlands International Law Review 79–88.Google Scholar
Wittich, Stephan. ‘Domestic Courts and the Content and Implementation of State Responsibility’ (2013) 26(3) Leiden Journal of International Law 643–665.Google Scholar
Wongkaew, Teerawat. Protection of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Wongkaew, Teerawat. ‘Specific Approval Requirement in Investment Treaties: A Pursuit of Legitimate Policy Objectives’, in Chaisse, Julien, Choukroune, Leïla and Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Singapore: Springer, 2021), 71–96.Google Scholar
Wood, Michael and Sthoeger, Eran. ‘Third-Party Intervention and Involvement in Inter-State Arbitration’, in Fabri, Helene Ruiz et al. (eds.), A Bridge over Troubled Waters: Dispute Resolution in the Law of International Watercourses and the Law of the Sea (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2020), 61–82.Google Scholar
Wouters, Jan and Chanet, Leen. ‘Corporate Human Rights Responsibility: A European Perspective’ (2008) 6(2) Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 262–302.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Hiroko, Ramesh, Shreya and Seelmann-Eggebert, Sebastian. ‘Perenco Ecuador v Republic of Ecuador Lessons from Perenco: Tribunal-Appointed Experts and Avoiding Double Recovery’ (2020) 35(3) ICSID Review 459–467.Google Scholar
Yates, Brian F. and Horvath, Celesa L. ‘Social License to Operate: How to Get It, and How to Keep It’ (2013) 2013 Pacific Energy Summit Working Papers, available at: www.nbr.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/programs/PES_2013_summitpaper_Yates_Horvath.pdf.Google Scholar
Yotova, Rumiana. ‘Challenges in the Identification of the “General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations”: The Approach of the International Court’ (2017) University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 38.Google Scholar
Zamir, Noam. ‘The Applicability of the Monetary Gold Principle in International Arbitration’ (2017) 33(4) Arbitration International 523–538.Google Scholar
Zarsky, Lyuba. ‘Global Reach: Human Rights and Environment in the Framework of Corporate Accountability’, in Zarsky, Lyuba (ed.), Human Rights and the Environment: Conflicts and Norms in a Globalizing World (London: Earthscan, 2012), 31–56.Google Scholar
Zeinemann, Robert. ‘The Characterization of Public Sector Mediation’ (2001) 24(2) Environs: Environmental Law and Policy Journal 49–64.Google Scholar
Zerk, Jennifer. ‘Corporate Liability for Gross Human Rights Abuses: Towards a Fairer and More Effective System of Domestic Law Remedies’ (2012) A Report Prepared for the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, available at: www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/DomesticLawRemedies/StudyDomesticeLawRemedies.pdf.Google Scholar
Zerk, Jennifer A. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and International Law: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Headed?’, in Lindsay, Rae and Martella, Roger (eds.), Corporate Responsibility, Sustainable Business: Environmental, Social and Governance Frameworks for the 21st Century (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2020), 173–203.Google Scholar
Zerk, Jennifer A. Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility: Limitations and Opportunities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), Chapters 1, 4, and 5.Google Scholar
Zeyl, Trevor. ‘Charting the Wrong Course: The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations in investment Treaty Law’ (2011) 49(1) Alberta Law Review 203–235.Google Scholar
Zomorrodi, Ahmad and Zhou, Xiaoyan. ‘Impact of FDI on Environmental Quality of China’ (2017) 4(1) International Journal of Business, Economics and Management 1–15.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Tomoko Ishikawa, Nagoya University, Japan
  • Book: Corporate Environmental Responsibility in Investor-State Dispute Settlement
  • Online publication: 24 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076425.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Tomoko Ishikawa, Nagoya University, Japan
  • Book: Corporate Environmental Responsibility in Investor-State Dispute Settlement
  • Online publication: 24 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076425.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Tomoko Ishikawa, Nagoya University, Japan
  • Book: Corporate Environmental Responsibility in Investor-State Dispute Settlement
  • Online publication: 24 November 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009076425.011
Available formats
×