Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:17:21.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Case-Based Approach to Specific Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2024

Neville M. Jadeja  and
Kyle C. Rossi
Neville M. Jadeja
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Kyle C. Rossi
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Critical Care EEG Basics
Rapid Bedside EEG Reading for Acute Care Providers
 , pp. 123 - 210
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Leitinger, M, Beniczky, S, Rohracher, A, et al. Salzburg consensus criteria for non-convulsive status epilepticus – Approach to clinical application. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2015 Aug 1;49:158–63.Google Scholar
Leitinger, M, Trinka, E, Zimmermann, G, Beniczky, S. Salzburg criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Details matter. Epilepsia. 2019 Nov;60(11):2334.Google Scholar
Krogstad, MH, Høgenhaven, H, Beier, CP, Krøigård, T. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Validating the Salzburg criteria against an expert EEG examiner. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2019 Mar 1;36(2):141–5.Google Scholar
Trinka, E, Cock, H, Hesdorffer, D, et al. A definition and classification of status epilepticus: Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification of Status Epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2015 Oct;56(10):1515–23.Google Scholar
Rossetti, AO, Lowenstein, DH. Management of refractory status epilepticus in adults: Still more questions than answers. Lancet Neurology. 2011 Oct 1;10(10):922–30.Google Scholar
Hocker, SE, Britton, JW, Mandrekar, JN, Wijdicks, EF, Rabinstein, AA. Predictors of outcome in refractory status epilepticus. JAMA Neurology. 2013 Jan 1;70(1):72–7.Google Scholar
Phabphal, K, Chisurajinda, S, Somboon, T, Unwongse, K, Geater, A. Does burst suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus? BMC Neurology. 2018 Dec;18(1):1–7.Google Scholar
Das, AS, Lee, JW, Izzy, S, Vaitkevicius, H. Ultra-short burst suppression as a “reset switch” for refractory status epilepticus. Seizure: European Journal of Epilepsy. 2019 Jan 1;64:41–4.Google Scholar
Johnson, EL, Martinez, NC, Ritzl, EK. EEG characteristics of successful burst suppression for refractory status epilepticus. Neurocritical Care. 2016 Dec;25(3):407–14.Google Scholar
Thompson, SA, Hantus, S. Highly epileptiform bursts are associated with seizure recurrence. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2016 Feb 1;33(1):66–71.Google Scholar
Panayiotopoulos, CP. Typical absence seizures and their treatment. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1999 Oct 1;81(4):351–5.Google Scholar
Datta, P, Hope, O, Kalamangalam, GP. Teaching NeuroImages: De novo absence status epilepticus in an adult. Neurology. 2016 Apr 26;86(17):e186.Google Scholar

References

Hirsch, LJ, Fong, MW, Leitinger, M, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society’s Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2021 version. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2021 Jan 1;38(1):1.Google Scholar
Johnson, EL, Kaplan, PW. Population of the ictal-interictal injury zone: The significance of periodic and rhythmic activity. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice. 2017 Jan 1;2:107–18.Google Scholar
Gelisse, P, Crespel, A, Genton, P, Jallon, P, Kaplan, PW. Lateralized periodic discharges: Which patterns are interictal injury, ictal, or peri-ictal? Clinical Neurophysiology. 2021 Jul 1;132(7):1593–603.Google Scholar
Hirsch, LJ, Claassen, J, Mayer, SA, Emerson, RG. Stimulus‐induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges (SIRPIDs): A common EEG phenomenon in the critically ill. Epilepsia. 2004 Feb;45(2):109–23.Google Scholar
Braksick, SA, Burkholder, DB, Tsetsou, S, et al. Associated factors and prognostic implications of stimulus-induced rhythmic, periodic, or ictal discharges. JAMA Neurology. 2016 May 1;73(5):585–90.Google Scholar

References

Laccheo, I, Sonmezturk, H, Bhatt, AB, et al. Non-convulsive status epilepticus and non-convulsive seizures in neurological ICU patients. Neurocritical Care. 2015 Apr;22(2):202–11.Google Scholar
Hirsch, LJ, Fong, MW, Leitinger, M, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society’s Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2021 version. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2021 Jan 1;38(1):1.Google Scholar
Payne, ET, Zhao, XY, Frndova, H, et al. Seizure burden is independently associated with short term outcome in critically ill children. Brain. 2014 May 1;137(5):1429–38.Google Scholar
Yoo, JY, Rampal, N, Petroff, OA, Hirsch, LJ, Gaspard, N. Brief potentially ictal rhythmic discharges in critically ill adults. JAMA Neurology. 2014 Apr 1;71(4):454–62.Google Scholar
Yoo, JY, Jetté, N, Kwon, CS, et al. Brief potentially ictal rhythmic discharges and paroxysmal fast activity as scalp electroencephalographic biomarkers of seizure activity and seizure onset zone. Epilepsia. 2021 Mar;62(3):742–51.Google Scholar
Smith, SJ. EEG in the diagnosis, classification, and management of patients with epilepsy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2005 Jun 1;76(suppl 2):ii2–7.Google Scholar
Sam, MC, So, EL. Significance of epileptiform discharges in patients without epilepsy in the community. Epilepsia. 2001 Oct 29;42(10):1273–8.Google Scholar
Sanchez Fernandez, I, Loddenkemper, T, Galanopoulou, AS, Moshé, SL. Should epileptiform discharges be treated? Epilepsia. 2015 Oct;56(10):1492–504.Google Scholar

References

Herman, ST, Abend, NS, Bleck, TP, et al. Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, Part I: Indications. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015 Apr;32(2):87.Google Scholar
Sutter, R, Ristic, A, Rüegg, S, Fuhr, P. Myoclonus in the critically ill: Diagnosis, management, and clinical impact. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2016 Jan 1;127(1):67–80.Google Scholar
Brenner, RP. Electroencephalography in syncope. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 1997 May 1;14(3):197–209.Google Scholar
Oto, M, Reuber, M. Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: Aetiology, diagnosis, and management. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. 2014 Jan;20(1):13–22.Google Scholar

References

Britton, JW, Frey, LC, Hopp, JL, et al. Electroencephalography (EEG): An introductory text and atlas of normal and abnormal findings in adults, children, and infants [Internet]. American Epilepsy Society, 2016.Google Scholar
Brigo, F, Cicero, R, Fiaschi, A, Bongiovanni, LG. The breach rhythm. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2011 Nov 1;122(11):2116–20.Google Scholar
Gaspard, N, Manganas, L, Rampal, N, Petroff, OA, Hirsch, LJ. Similarity of lateralized rhythmic delta activity to periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges in critically ill patients. JAMA Neurology. 2013 Oct 1;70(10):1288–95.Google Scholar
Mameniškienė, R, Wolf, P. Epilepsia partialis continua: A review. Seizure. 2017 Jan 1;44:74–80.Google Scholar

References

Hooshmand, H. The clinical significance of frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity (FIRDA). Clinical Electroencephalography. 1983 Jul;14(3):135–7.Google Scholar
Lee, SI, Kirby, D. Absence seizure with generalized rhythmic delta activity. Epilepsia. 1988 Jun;29(3):262–7.Google Scholar
Boulanger, JM, Deacon, C, Lécuyer, D, Gosselin, S, Reiher, J. Triphasic waves versus nonconvulsive status epilepticus: EEG distinction. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 2006 Jul;33(2):175–80.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D, Chen, PM, Gaspard, N, et al. Response rates to anticonvulsant trials in patients with triphasic-wave EEG patterns of uncertain significance. Neurocritical Care. 2016 Apr;24(2):233–9.Google Scholar
Hirsch, LJ, Fong, MW, Leitinger, M, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society’s Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2021 version. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2021 Jan 1;38(1):1.Google Scholar
Kassab, MY, Farooq, MU, Diaz-Arrastia, R, Van Ness, PC. The clinical significance of EEG cyclic alternating pattern during coma. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2007 Dec 1;24(6):425–8.Google Scholar

References

Schmitt, SE, Pargeon, K, Frechette, ES, Hirsch, LJ, Dalmau, J, Friedman, D. Extreme delta brush: A unique EEG pattern in adults with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Neurology. 2012 Sep 11;79(11):1094–100.Google Scholar
Nathoo, N, Anderson, D, Jirsch, J. Extreme delta brush in anti-NMDAR encephalitis correlates with poor functional outcome and death. Frontiers in Neurology. 2021;12.Google Scholar
Herlopian, A, Rosenthal, ES, Chu, CJ, Cole, AJ, Struck, AF. Extreme delta brush evolving into status epilepticus in a patient with anti-NMDA encephalitis. Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports. 2017 Jan 1;7:69–71.Google Scholar
Hirsch, LJ, Fong, MW, Leitinger, M, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society’s Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2021 version. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2021 Jan 1;38(1):1.Google Scholar
Westmoreland, BF, Klass, DW, Sharbrough, FW, Reagan, TJ. Alpha-coma: Electroencephalographic, clinical, pathologic, and etiologic correlations. Archives of Neurology. 1975 Nov 1;32(11):713–18.Google Scholar
Kaplan, PW, Genoud, D, Ho, TW, Jallon, P. Etiology, neurologic correlations, and prognosis in alpha coma. Clinical Neurophysiology. 1999 Feb 1;110(2):205–13.Google Scholar
Fernández-Torre, JL, Hernández-Hernández, MA, Muñoz-Esteban, C. Non confirmatory electroencephalography in patients meeting clinical criteria for brain death: Scenario and impact on organ donation. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2013 Dec 1;124(12):2362–7.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, TA, Ashwal, S, Mathur, M, Mysore, M, Committee for Determination of Brain Death in Infants Children. Guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: An update of the 1987 task force recommendations – executive summary. Annals of Neurology. 2012 Apr;71(4):573–85.Google Scholar
Machado, C, Jeret, JS, Shewmon, DA, et al. Evidence-based guideline update: Determining brain death in adults: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2011 Jan 18;76(3):307–9.Google Scholar
Stecker, MM, Sabau, D, Sullivan, LR, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society guideline 6: Minimum technical standards for EEG recording in suspected cerebral death. The Neurodiagnostic Journal. 2016 Oct 1;56(4):276–84.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×