Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:36:23.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 13 - Critical Thinking in STEM Disciplines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2019

By
Robert J. Sternberg
Edited by
Robert J. Sternberg  and
Diane F. Halpern
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Diane F. Halpern
Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College, California
Get access

Summary

Critical thinking in science and many other disciplines should encompass creative, analytical, practical, and wise thinking. Underlying it are both cognitive processes and dispositions–that is, what a person can do and what a person chooses to do. Critical thinking is both domain-general and domain-specific. The domain-specific elements of it cannot be well captured by general tests of critical thinking. We have found that critical thinking in STEM disciplines involves skills that are quite different from those involved in taking tests of cognitive and academic skills. Some of these skills are generating hypotheses, generating experiments, and drawing conclusions. In our tests of these skills, which we have administered to students at Cornell University, scores on the tests correlated not at all or even negatively with tests of academic preparation, such as the SAT and the ACT. Thus, universities that select future scientists and engineers on the basis of such standardized tests may be choosing the wrong people unless they can assure that those people are good scientific reasoners, not just good takers of analytically-oriented tests.

Keywords

availabilitycritical thinkinganalytical thinkingcreative thinkingpractical thinkingdomain-general skillsdomain-specific skills
Type
Chapter
Information
Critical Thinking in Psychology , pp. 309 - 327
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baer, J. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review, 37(3), 165–178.Google Scholar
Baron, J. B., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (1987). Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355–429. DOI:10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, A. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36, 1118–1133.Google Scholar
Carr, P. B., & Dweck, C. S. (in press). Intelligence and motivation. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2003). The psychology of problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Detterman, D. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (1993). Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furst, E. J. (1950). Relationship between tests of intelligence and tests of critical thinking and of knowledge. The Journal of Educational Research, 43(8), 614–625.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.Google Scholar
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.Google Scholar
Hedlund, J. (in press). Practical intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janis, I. L., & Frick, F. (1943). The relationships between attitudes toward conclusions and errors in judging logical validity of syllogisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 73–77.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Glăvenau, V. P. (2019). A review of creativity theories: What questions are we trying to answer? In, R. J. Sternberg & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2011). Intelligence and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 771–783). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, J. F., & Cantor, N. (in press). Social intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lubinski, D. (2018). Individual differences at the top: Mapping the outer envelope of intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of human intelligence (pp. 230–255). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Kell, H. J. (2014). Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psychological Science, 25, 2217–2232.Google Scholar
McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present and future. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (2nd ed.). (pp. 156–182). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
O’Hare, L., & McGuinness, C. (2012). Measuring critical thinking, intelligence, and academic performance in psychology undergraduates. Irish Journal of Psychology, 30(3), 123–131.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (2004). Generalization of creativity across domains: Examination of the method effect hypothesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (2005). The (relatively) generalist view of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 307–312). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2010). Education based on a parsimonious theory of creativity. In Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 235–251). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (2013). Divergent thinking and creative potential. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2018). Authentic creativity: Mechanisms, definitions, and empirical efforts. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The nature of human creativity (pp. 246–263). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sackett, P. R., Shewach, O. R., & Dahlke, J. A. (in press). The predictive value of general intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Human intelligence: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. E. (1904). ‘General intelligence’, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., Toplak, M. E., & West, R. F. (in press). Intelligence and rationality. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2016). The rationality quotient: Toward a test of rational thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985a). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985b). Critical thinking: Its nature, measurement, and improvement. In Link, F. R. (Ed.), Essays on the intellect (pp. 45–65). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of intelligence. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence: A new theory of intelligence. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Styles of thinking. In Fasko, D. (Ed.), Critical thinking and reasoning: Current theories, research, and practice (pp. 67–87). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Critical thinking in psychology: It really is critical. In Sternberg, R. J., Roediger, III H. L., & Halpern, D. F. (Eds.), Critical thinking in psychology (pp. 289–296). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Preparing for college and graduate school: What do tests like the SAT, ACT, and GRE tell us? In Good, T. L. (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook, Vol. 2 (pp. 473–480). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2011). The theory of successful intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 504–527). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (in press-a). The augmented theory of successful intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.) (in press-b). Cambridge handbook of intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2001). Complex cognition: The psychology of human thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Castejón, J. L., Prieto, M. D., Hautamäki, J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sternberg triarchic abilities test in three international samples: An empirical test of the triarchic theory of intelligence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(1) 1–16.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1995). The triarchic model applied to identifying, teaching, and assessing gifted children. Roeper Review, 17(4), 255–260.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.). (2002). The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Ferrari, M., & Clinkenbeard, P. (1999). A triarchic analysis of an aptitude–treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2018). The nature of human creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Nokes, K., Geissler, P. W., Prince, R., Okatcha, F., Bundy, D. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). The relationship between academic and practical intelligence: A case study in Kenya. Intelligence, 29, 401–418.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & The Rainbow Project Collaborators (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical and creative skills. Intelligence, 34(4), 321–350.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Roediger, III, H. L., & Halpern, D. F. (Eds.). (2007). Critical thinking in psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Smith, C. (1985). Social intelligence and decoding skills in nonverbal communication. Social Cognition, 2, 168–192.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Spear-Swerling, L. (1996). Teaching for thinking. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2017). Measuring scientific reasoning for graduate admissions in psychology and related disciplines. Journal of Intelligence, 5(3). DOI:10.3390/jintelligence5030029Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Sternberg, K., & Todhunter, R. J. E. (2017). Measuring reasoning about teaching for graduate admissions in psychology and related disciplines. Journal of Intelligence, 5(4). DOI:10.3390/jintelligence5040034Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1997). Does the Graduate Record Examination predict meaningful success in the graduate training of psychologists? A case study. American Psychologist, 52, 630–641.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Wong, C. H., & Sternberg, K. (in press). The relation of tests of scientific reasoning to each other and to tests of fluid intelligence. Journal of Intelligence.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1962). A tentative description of the creative individual. In Parnes, S. J. & Harding, H. F. (Eds.), A sourcebook for creative thinking (pp. 169–184). New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2018). Reflections on a personal journey studying the psychology of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The nature of human creativity (pp. 351–373). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×