Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:31:18.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Mutual Constitution of Culture and the Mind

Insights from Cultural Neuroscience

from Section 1 - The Co-emergence of Culture, Mind, and Brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

Laurence J. Kirmayer
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Carol M. Worthman
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Shinobu Kitayama
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Robert Lemelson
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Constance A. Cummings
Affiliation:
The Foundation for Psychocultural Research
Get access

Summary

Culture is composed of meanings (e.g., values, beliefs, and norms) and practices (e.g., conventions, scripts, and routines) that are shared, albeit unevenly, in a given community and group. Culture is integral to biological adaptation, not an overlay to the human mind but part and parcel of how the human mind functions. Since the mind is shaped through culture, it also contributes to the reproduction of culture. This chapter highlights a broad contrast thought to separate the West from the “rest,” with Westerners being more independent or less interdependent than non-Westerners, although non-Western regions themselves are highly variable, reflecting diverse adaptive strategies for achieving interdependence under varying socio-ecological conditions. We review existing behavioral and neuroscience evidence to support a broad distinction between the West and the non-West based on three core features of interdependence: predictors of happiness, holistic attention, and holistic social cognition. We also summarize recent evidence suggesting that culture influences cortical volume in specific brain regions. We conclude by pointing out that while cultural shaping of mentality is highly idiosyncratic at the individual level, it can nonetheless be systematic at the collective level, enabling faithful reproduction of the cultural system by which individuals have been trained and shaped.

Type
Chapter
Information
Culture, Mind, and Brain
Emerging Concepts, Models, and Applications
, pp. 88 - 119
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakerman`s-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2006). Gene–environment interaction of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) and observed maternal insensitivity predicting externalizing behavior in preschoolers. Developmental Psychobiology, 48(5), 406–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20152Google Scholar
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to rearing environment depending on dopamine-related genes: New evidence and a meta-analysis. Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 3952. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000635CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Pijlman, F. T. A., Mesman, J., & Juffer, F. (2008). Experimental evidence for differential susceptibility: Dopamine D4 receptor polymorphism (DRD4 VNTR) moderates intervention effects on toddlers’ externalizing behavior in a randomized controlled trial. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 293300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.293Google Scholar
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 885908. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017376Google Scholar
Chee, M. W. L., Zheng, H., Goh, J. O. S., Park, D., & Sutton, B. P. (2011). Brain structure in young and old East Asians and Westerners: Comparisons of structural volume and cortical thickness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(5), 1065–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21513Google Scholar
Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 4763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.47Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (2018). The strange order of things: Life, feeling, and the making of cultures. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
de Oliveira, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2017). Beyond East and West: Cognitive style in Latin America. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(10), 1554–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117730816Google Scholar
Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427(6972), 311–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/427311aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, L. E., & Keller, M. C. (2011). A critical review of the first 10 years of candidate gene-by-environment interaction research in psychiatry. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 168(10), 1041–9. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020191Google Scholar
Fellows, L. K. (2011). Orbitofrontal contributions to value-based decision making: Evidence from humans with frontal lobe damage. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1239(1), 51–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06229.xGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). “I” value freedom, but ‘we’ value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10(4), 321–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(27), 9240–5. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-27-09240.2003Google Scholar
Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4(6), 385–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.xGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 2138. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., & Jones, E. E. (1986). Perceiver-induced constraint: Interpretations of self-generated reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 269–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto, S. G., Ando, Y., Huang, C., Yee, A., & Lewis, R. S. (2010). Cultural differences in the visual processing of meaning: Detecting incongruities between background and foreground objects using the N400. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(2–3), 242–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp038Google Scholar
Goto, S. G., Yee, A., Lowenberg, K., & Lewis, R. S. (2013). Cultural differences in sensitivity to social context: Detecting affective incongruity using the N400. Social Neuroscience, 8(1), 6374. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2012.739202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haber, S. (2011). Neuroanatomy of reward: A view from the ventral striatum. In Gottfried, J. A. (Ed.), Neurobiology of sensation and reward. (pp. 235–62). CRC Press. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92777/Google Scholar
Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., Yeung, N., & Simons, R. F. (2005). On the ERN and the significance of errors. Psychophysiology, 42(2), 151–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00270.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, S., Northoff, G., Vogeley, K., Wexler, B. E., Kitayama, S., & Varnum, M. E. W. (2013). A cultural neuroscience approach to the biosocial nature of the human brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 335–59. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071112-054629Google Scholar
Hedden, T., Ketay, S., Aron, A., Markus, H. R., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2008). Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychological Science, 19(1), 1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02038.xGoogle Scholar
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766–94. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.106.4.766Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2015). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. SAGE.Google Scholar
Ji, L.-J., Zhang, Z., & Nisbett, R. E. (2004). Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 5765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.57Google Scholar
Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785800. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785Google Scholar
Kim, H. S., & Sasaki, J. Y. (2014). Cultural neuroscience: Biology of the mind in cultural contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 487514. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115040Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14(3), 201–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S., Ishii, K., Imada, T., Takemura, K., & Ramaswamy, J. (2006). Voluntary settlement and the spirit of independence: Evidence from Japan’s ‘northern frontier.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 369–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.369Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., King, A., Yoon, C., Tompson, S., Huff, S., & Liberzon, I. (2014). The dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) moderates cultural difference in independent versus interdependent social orientation. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1169–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614528338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Kurokawa, M. (2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition and Emotion, 14(1), 93124. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300379003Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245–67. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.6.1245Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., & Karasawa, M. (2006). Cultural affordances and emotional experience: Socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 890903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.890Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., & Park, J. (2014). Error-related brain activity reveals self-centric motivation: Culture matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 6270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031696.suppGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S., Park, H., Sevincer, A. T., Karasawa, M., & Uskul, A. K. (2009). A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: Comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 236–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015999CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitayama, S., & Salvador, C. E. (2017). Culture embrained: Going beyond the nature-nurture dichotomy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 841–54. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1745691617707317CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitayama, S., San Martín, Á., & Savani, K. (2019). Varieties of interdependence and the emergence of the modern West: Toward the globalizing of psychology. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Snibbe, A. C., Markus, H. R., & Suzuki, T. (2004). Is there any “free” choice? Self and dissonance in two cultures. Psychological Science, 15(8), 527–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00714.xGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S., & Tompson, S. (2015). A biosocial model of affective decision making: Implications for dissonance, motivation, and culture. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 72137). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.04.001Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., & Uskul, A. K. (2011). Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 419–49. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145357Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Varnum, M. E. W., & Salvador, C. M. (2019). Cultural neuroscience. In Cohen, D. & Kitayama, S. (Eds.), The handbook of cultural psychology (2nd ed., pp. 79118). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Yanagisawa, K., Ito, A., Ueda, R., Uchida, Y., & Abe, N. (2017). Reduced orbitofrontal cortical volume is associated with interdependent self-construal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(30), 7969–74. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704831114Google Scholar
Knutson, B., & Greer, S. M. (2008). Anticipatory affect: Neural correlates and consequences for choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1511), 3771–86. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0155Google Scholar
Lövdén, M., Wenger, E., Mårtensson, J., Lindenberger, U., & Bäckman, L. (2013). Structural brain plasticity in adult learning and development. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(9, Part B), 2296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.014Google Scholar
Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(8), 4398–403. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.070039597Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224Google Scholar
Masuda, T., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Perceiver-induced constraint and attitude attribution in Japan and the US: A case for the cultural dependence of the correspondence bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(3), 409–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.08.004Google Scholar
Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 922–34. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.922Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 961–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.961Google Scholar
Miller, J. G., Bersoff, D. M., & Harwood, R. L. (1990). Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States: Moral imperatives or personal decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 3347. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.58.1.33Google Scholar
Miyamoto, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2002). Cultural variation in correspondence bias: The critical role of attitude diagnosticity of socially constrained behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1239–48. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.1239Google Scholar
Morling, B., Kitayama, S., & Miyamoto, Y. (2002). Cultural practices emphasize influence in the United States and adjustment in Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 311–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286003Google Scholar
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.949Google Scholar
Murata, A., Park, J., Kovelman, I., Hu, X., & Kitayama, S. (2015). Culturally non-preferred cognitive tasks require compensatory attention: A functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) investigation. Culture and Brain, 3(1), 5367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167–015-0027-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Na, J., Grossmann, I., Varnum, M. E. W., Kitayama, S., Gonzalez, R., & Nisbett, R. E. (2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(14), 6192–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001911107Google Scholar
Na, J., & Kitayama, S. (2011). Spontaneous trait inference is culture-specific: Behavioral and neural evidence. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1025–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611414727Google Scholar
Nikolova, Y. S., Ferrell, R. E., Manuck, S. B., & Hariri, A. R. (2011). Multilocus genetic profile for dopamine signaling predicts ventral striatum reactivity. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36(9), 1940–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2011.82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). New directions in social psychology. Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Westview Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J. (2006). Self-referential processing in our brain: A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. NeuroImage, 31(1), 440–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002Google Scholar
O’Doherty, J. P. (2011). Contributions of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex to goal-directed action selection. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1239(1), 118–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06290.xGoogle Scholar
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311Google Scholar
Reich, D. (2018). Who we are and how we got here: Ancient DNA and the new science of the human past. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rhee, E., Uleman, J. S., Lee, H. K., & Roman, R. J. (1995). Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 142–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.142Google Scholar
Rolls, E. T., & Grabenhorst, F. (2008). The orbitofrontal cortex and beyond: From affect to decision-making. Progress in Neurobiology, 86(3), 216–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.09.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenzweig, M. R., Krech, D., Bennett, E. L., & Zolman, J. F. (1962). Variation in environmental complexity and brain measures. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55(6), 1092–5. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042758CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 173220). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065–2601(08)60357-3Google Scholar
Ruby, M. B., Falk, C. F., Heine, S. J., Villa, C., & Silberstein, O. (2012). Not all collectivisms are equal: Opposing preferences for ideal affect between East Asians and Mexicans. Emotion, 12(6), 1206–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029118Google Scholar
Rychlowska, M., Miyamoto, Y., Matsumoto, D., Hess, U., Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Kamble, S., Muluk, H., Masuda, T., & Niedenthal, P. M. (2015). Heterogeneity of long-history migration explains cultural differences in reports of emotional expressivity and the functions of smiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(19), E2429E2436. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1413661112Google Scholar
Said, E. W. (1979 ). Orientalism. Vintage Books.Google Scholar
San Martín, A., Sinaceur, M., Madi, A., Tompson, S., Maddux, W. W., & Kitayama, S. (2018). Self-assertive interdependence in Arab culture. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 830–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562–018-0435-zGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Burks, J., Nisbett, R. E., & Ybarra, O. (2000). Cultural styles, relational schemas, and prejudice against out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 174–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.174Google Scholar
Savani, K., Markus, H. R., & Conner, A. L. (2008). Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 861–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011618Google Scholar
Schultz, W. (2002). Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron, 36(2), 241–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896–6273(02)00967-4Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3), 137–82. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2005). The argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian history, culture and identity. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Sheese, B. E., Voelker, P. M., Rothbart, M. K., & Posner, M. P. (2007). Parenting quality interacts with genetic variation in dopamine receptor D4 to influence temperament in early childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 19(4), 1039–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579407000521Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A., & Bourne, E. J. (1982). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In Marsella, A. J. & White, G. M. (Eds.), Cultural conceptions of mental health and therapy culture, illness, and healing (pp. 97137). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9220-3_4Google Scholar
Sui, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2013). Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(19), 7607–12. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221862110Google Scholar
Talhelm, T., Zhang, X., Oishi, S., Shimin, C., Duan, D., Lan, X., & Kitayama, S. (2014). Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science, 344(6184), 603–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246850Google Scholar
Telzer, E. H., & Fuligni, A. J. (2009). Daily family assistance and the psychological well-being of adolescents from Latin American, Asian, and European backgrounds. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1177–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014728Google Scholar
Telzer, E. H., Masten, C. L., Berkman, E. T., Lieberman, M. D., & Fuligni, A. J. (2010). Gaining while giving: An fMRI study of the rewards of family assistance among White and Latino youth. Social Neuroscience, 5(5–6), 508–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470911003687913Google Scholar
Tompson, S. H., Huff, S. T., Yoon, C., King, A., Liberzon, I., & Kitayama, S. (2018). The dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) modulates cultural variation in emotional experience. Culture and Brain, 6(2), 118–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167–018-0063-5Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1995). New directions in social psychology. Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1995-97791-000Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C., Marn, G., Lisansky, J., & Betancourt, H. (1984). Simpatía as a cultural script of Hispanics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1363–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1363Google Scholar
Uchida, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Happiness and unhappiness in east and west: Themes and variations. Emotion, 9(4), 441–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015634Google Scholar
Uchida, Y., Takemura, K., Fukushima, S., Saizen, I., Kawamura, Y., Hitokoto, H., Koizumi, N., & Yoshikawa, S. (2019). Farming cultivates a community-level shared culture through collective activities: Examining contextual effects with multilevel analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000138Google Scholar
Uleman, J. S., Saribay, S. A., & Gonzalez, C. M. (2008). Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 329–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093707Google Scholar
van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Belsky, J., Beach, S., Brody, G., Dodge, K. A., Greenberg, J., Posner, M., & Scott, S. (2011). Gene-by-environment experiments: A new approach to finding the missing heritability. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12(2), 881. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2764-c1Google Scholar
van IJzendoorn, M. H., Caspers, K., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Beach, S. R. H., & Philibert, R. (2010). Methylation matters: Interaction between methylation density and serotonin transporter genotype predicts unresolved loss or trauma. Biological Psychiatry, 68(5), 405–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.05.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varnum, M. E. W., Shi, Z., Chen, A., Qiu, J., & Han, S. (2014). When “Your” reward is the same as “My” reward: Self-construal priming shifts neural responses to own vs. friends’ rewards. NeuroImage, 87, 164–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.042Google Scholar
Wang, F., Peng, K., Chechlacz, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2017). The neural basis of independence versus interdependence orientations. Psychological Science, 28(4), 519–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616689079Google Scholar
Weeland, J., Overbeek, G., de Castro, B. O., & Matthys, W. (2015). Underlying mechanisms of gene-environment interactions in externalizing behavior: A systematic review and search for theoretical mechanisms. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 18(4), 413–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567–015-0196-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, A., Rychlowska, M., & Niedenthal, P. M. (2016). Heterogeneity of long-history migration predicts emotion recognition accuracy. Emotion, 16(4), 413–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000137Google Scholar
Woollett, K., & Maguire, E. A. (2011). Acquiring “the knowledge” of London’s layout drives structural brain changes. Current Biology, 21(24), 2109–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.018Google Scholar
Yu, Q., Abe, N., King, A., Yoon, C., Liberzon, I., & Kitayama, S. (2019). Cultural variation in the gray matter volume of the prefrontal cortex is moderated by the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4). Cerebral Cortex, 29(9), 3922–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy271Google Scholar
Zárate, M. A., Uleman, J. S., & Voils, C. I. (2001). Effects of culture and processing goals on the activation and binding of trait conceptsSocial Cognition, 19(3), 295323. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.3.295.21469Google Scholar
Zhu, X., Zhang, H., Wu, L., Yang, S., Wu, H., Luo, W., Gu, R., & Luo, Y. (2018). The influence of self-construals on the ERP response to the rewards for self and mother. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(2), 366–74. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415–018-0575-7Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×