Book contents
- Data and Methods in Corpus Linguistics
- Data and Methods in Corpus Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Comparative Approaches to Data and Methods in Corpus Linguistics
- Part I Corpus Dimensions and the Viability of Methodological Approaches
- Part II Selection, Calibration and Preparation of Corpus Data
- Part III Perspectives on Multifactorial Methods
- Part IV Applications of Classification-Based Approaches
- Index
- References
Part II - Selection, Calibration and Preparation of Corpus Data
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 May 2022
Book contents
- Data and Methods in Corpus Linguistics
- Data and Methods in Corpus Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Comparative Approaches to Data and Methods in Corpus Linguistics
- Part I Corpus Dimensions and the Viability of Methodological Approaches
- Part II Selection, Calibration and Preparation of Corpus Data
- Part III Perspectives on Multifactorial Methods
- Part IV Applications of Classification-Based Approaches
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Data and Methods in Corpus LinguisticsComparative Approaches, pp. 73 - 160Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Further Reading
Biber, Douglas, and Conrad, Susan. 2019. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohmann, Axel. 2020. Variation in English Worldwide: Registers and Global Varieties. Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fang, Alex C., and Cao, Jing. 2015. Text Genres and Registers: The Computation of Linguistic Features. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Charles F. 2004. Can You Really Study Language Variation in Linguistic Corpora? American Speech 79(4). 339–55.Google Scholar
Sigley, Robert. 2012. Assessing Corpus Comparability Using a Formality Index: The Case of the Brown/LOB Clones. In Yamazaki, Shunji, Sigley, Robert and Saito, Toshio, eds. Approaching Language Variation Through Corpora: A Festschrift in Honour of Toshio Saito. Linguistic Insights. Bern: Lang. 65–114.Google Scholar
References
Alonso Belmonte, Maria Isabel. 2007. Newspaper Editorials and Comment Articles: A “Cinderella” Genre? Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada 1–9.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1991. The Language of News Media. Language in Society. 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Conrad, Susan. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonyadi, Alireza. 2011. Linguistic Manifestations of Modality in Newspaper Editorials. International Journal of Linguistics 3(1) 16 pages.Google Scholar
Cavnar, William, and Trenkle, John. 1994. N-Gram-Based Text Categorization. Proceeding of the Third Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval. Reno, NV: Information Science Research Institute, University of Nevada. 161–77.Google Scholar
Cotter, Colleen. 2010. News Talk: Investigating the Language of Journalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Alex C. 1996. AUTASYS: Grammatical Tagging and Cross-Tagset Mapping. In Greenbaum, Sidney, ed. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 110–24.Google Scholar
Fang, Alex C., and Cao, Jing. 2015. Text Genres and Registers: The Computation of Linguistic Features. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Fartousi, Hassan, and Dumanig, Francisco P.. 2012. Rhetoric of Daily Editorials: A Review Study of Selected Rhetorical Analyses on Daily Editorials. Advances in Asian Social Science 2(1). 373–6.Google Scholar
Garside, Roger, and Smith, Nicholas. 1997. A Hybrid Grammatical Tagger: CLAWS4. In Roger Garside, Geoffrey N. Leech and McEnery, Tony, eds. Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora. London: Longman. 102–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1996. Introducing ICE. In Greenbaum, Sidney, ed. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T., Newman, John and Shaoul, Cyrus. 2011. N-Grams and the Clustering of Registers. Empirical Language Research 5(1).Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack. 2014. A Comparison of Statistical Methods for the Aggregation of Regional Linguistic Variation. In Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt and Wälchli, Bernhard, eds. Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis: Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech. Linguae and Litterae 28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 53–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2015. World Englishes. In Biber, Douglas and Reppen, Randi, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Gareth, Witten, Daniela, Hastie, Trevor and Tibshirani, Robert. 2013. An Introduction to Statistical Learning. Springer Texts in Statistics 103. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Kirk, John, and Nelson, Gerald. 2017. Review of the ICE Project 2016/17. Paper presented at ICAME38, Prague, 25 May.Google Scholar
Kirk, John, and Nelson, Gerald. 2018. The International Corpus of English Project: A Progress Report. World Englishes 37(4). 697–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liaw, Andy, and Wiener, Matthew. 2002. Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News 2(3). 18–22.Google Scholar
Ljung, Magnus. 2000. Newspaper Genres and Newspaper English. In Ungerer, Friedrich, ed. English Media Texts, Past and Present: Language and Textual Structure Pragmatics and Beyond 80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 129–214.Google Scholar
McNair, Brian. 2009. I, Columnist. In Franklin, Bob, ed. Pulling Newspapers Apart: Analysing Print Journalism. 1st ed. London: Routledge. 112–20.Google Scholar
Moisl, Hermann L. 2015. Cluster Analysis for Corpus Linguistics. Quantitative Linguistics 66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Morley, John, and Murphy, Amanda. 2011. The Peroration Revisited. In Bhatia, Vijay K. and Gotti, Maurizio, eds. Explorations in Specialized Genres. Bern: Lang. 199–216.Google Scholar
Müller, Horst. 2011. Journalistisches Arbeiten: Journalistische Grundlagen Journalistische Arbeitstechniken Journalistische Darstellungsformen. Reihe Mediengestützte Wissensvermittlung 5. 1st ed. Mittweida: Hochschulverlag.Google Scholar
Nelson, Gerald. 1996. The Design of the Corpus. In Greenbaum, Sidney, ed. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Gerald, Wallis, Sean and Aarts, Bas. 2002. Exploring Natural Language: Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English. Varieties of English Around the World. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nini, Andrea. 2014. Multidimensional Analysis Tagger. https://sites.google.com/site/multidimensionaltagger/home.Google Scholar
Petrenz, Philipp, and Webber, Bonnie. 2011. Stable Classification of Text Genres. Computational Linguistics 37(2). 385–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Reeves, Ian, and Keeble, Richard. 2014. The Newspapers Handbook. Media practice. 5th ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, John. 2009. Readers’ Letters. In Franklin, Bob, ed. Pulling Newspapers Apart: Analysing Print Journalism. 1st ed. London: Routledge. 58–69.Google Scholar
Rüdiger, Sofia. 2016. Cuppa Coffee? Challenges and Opportunities of Compiling a Conversational English Corpus in an Expanding Circle Setting. In Christ, Hanna, Klenovšak, Daniel, Sönning, Lukas and Werner, Valentin, eds. A Blend of MaLT: Selected Contributions from the Methods and Linguistic Theories Symposium 2015. Bamberger Beiträge zur Linguistik Band 15. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press. 49–71.Google Scholar
Santini, Marina. 2004. A Shallow Approach to Syntactic Feature Extraction for Genre Classification. In Lee, Mark, ed. Proceedings of the 7th Annual CLUK Research Colloquium: 6th & 7th January 2004, University of Birmingham. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, School of Computer Science.Google Scholar
Sigley, Robert. 2012. Assessing Corpus Comparability Using a Formality Index: The Case of the Brown/LOB Clones. In Yamazaki, Shunji, Sigley, Robert and Saito, Toshio, eds. Approaching Language Variation through Corpora: A Festschrift in Honour of Toshio Saito. Linguistic Insights. Bern: Lang. 65–114.Google Scholar
Straßner, Erich. 2000. Journalistische Texte. Grundlagen der Medienkommunikation 10. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Xiaoyan, and Cao, Jing. 2015. Automatic Genre Classification via N-grams of Part-of-Speech Tags. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 198. 474–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Intersubjectivity in Newspaper Editorials: Construing the Reader-in-the-Text. In van de Velde, Freek, Brems, Lieselotte and Ghesquière, Lobke, eds. Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical and Descriptive Advances. Benjamins Current Topics 65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 77–100.Google Scholar
Vetter, Fabian. 2021. Issues of Corpus Comparability and Register Variation in the International Corpus of English: Theories and Computer Applications. PhD Dissertation, University of Bamberg. doi: https://doi.org/10.20378/irb-52406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2009. Op-ed Pages. In Franklin, Bob, ed. Pulling Newspapers Apart: Analysing Print Journalism. 1st ed. London: Routledge. 70–8.Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin. 2014. The Present Perfect in World Englishes: Charting Unity and Diversity. Bamberger Beiträge zur Linguistik 5. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.Google Scholar
Westin, Ingrid. 2002. Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials. Language and Computers 44. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Further Reading
Hundt, Marianne. 2009. How Often do Things Get V-ed in Philippine and Singapore English? A Case Study of the Get-Passive in Two Outer-Circle Varieties of English. In Bowen, Rhonwen, Mobarg, Mats and Ohlander, Solve, eds. Corpora and Discourse – and Stuff: Papers in Honor of Karin Aijmer. Gothenburg Studies in English 96. Gothenberg: University of Gothenburg. 121–31.Google Scholar
Mehl, Seth. 2018. What We Talk about When We Talk about Corpus Frequency: The Example of Polysemous Verbs with Light and Concrete Senses. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2017-0039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Sean. 2021. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A New Approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
References
Ball, Catherine. 1994. Automated Text Analysis: Cautionary Tales. Literary and Linguistic Computing 9(4). 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, David. 1994. Writ in Water: Aspects of the Scientific Journal Article. Brest: Erla, Université de Bretagne Occidentale.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles. 1962. Some Measurable Characteristics of Modern Scientific Prose. In Behre, Frank, ed. Contributions to English Syntax and Philology. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell. 21–43.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Finegan, Edward, Johannson, Stig, Conrad, Susan and Leech, Geoffrey. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela. 1996. The Semantics of Get-Passives. In Hasan, Ruqaiya, Cloran, Carmel and Butt, David G., eds. Functional Descriptions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evison, Jane. 2010. What Are the Basics of Analysing a Corpus? In O’Keeffe, Anne and McCarthy, Michael, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. London: Routledge. 122–35.Google Scholar
Fleisher, Nicholas. 2006. The Origin of Passive Get. English Language and Linguistics 10(2). 225–52.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1996. Introducing ICE. In Greenbaum, Sidney, ed. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, Anna Granville. 1949. To Get/Be Invited. Modern Language Notes 64(7). 433–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2005. A Student’s Introduction to English Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2009. How Often to Things Get V-ed in Philippine and Singapore English? A Case Study of the Get-Passive in Two Outer-Circle Varieties of English. In Bowen, Rhonwen, Mobarg, Mats and Ohlander, Solve, eds. Corpora and Discourse – and Stuff: Papers in Honor of Karin Aijmer. Gothenburg Studies in English 96. 121–31.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1949. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part 7. Copenhagen: E. Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Lavandera, Beatriz. 1978. Where Does the Sociolinguistic Variable Stop? Language in Society 7. 171–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1971. Passive Resistance. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 7. 149–62.Google Scholar
Lindquist, Hans. 2009. Corpus Linguistics and the Description of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, and Wilson, Andrew. 2001. Corpus Linguistics. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Xiao, Richard and Tono, Yukio. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mehl, Seth. 2018. What We Talk about When We Talk about Corpus Frequency: The Example of Polysemous Verbs with Light and Concrete Senses. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2017-0039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehl, Seth. 2019. Mapping Lexical Co-occurrence Statistics against a Part of Speech Baseline. In Parviainen, Hannah, Kaunisto, Mark and Pahta, Päivi, eds. Corpus Approaches into World Englishes and Language Contrasts. Helsinki: eVarieng. https://varieng.helsinki.fi/series/volumes/20/mehl/ (accessed 27 March 2021).Google Scholar
Nelson, Gerald, Aarts, Bas and Wallis, Sean. 2002. Exploring Natural Language: Working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcombe, Robert. 1998. Two-Sided Confidence Intervals for the Single Proportion: Comparison of Seven Methods. Statistics in Medicine 17. 857–72.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schegloff, Emanuel a. 1993. Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(1). 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas, and Leech, Geoffrey. 2013. Verb Structures in Twentieth-Century British English. In Aarts, Bas, Close, Joanne, Leech, Geoffrey and Wallis, Sean, eds. The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 68–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toyota, Junichi. 2008. Diachronic Change in the English Passive. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Sean. 2012a. That Vexed Problem of Choice. London: UCL Survey of English Usage. www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/statspapers/vexedchoice.pdf (accessed 27 March 2021).Google Scholar
Wallis, Sean. 2012b. Freedom to Vary and Significance Tests. London: UCL Survey of English Usage. http://corplingstats.wordpress.com/2012/09/30/free-to-vary (accessed 27 March 2021).Google Scholar
Wallis, Sean. 2013. Binomial Confidence Intervals and Contingency Tests. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 20(3). 178–208.Google Scholar
Wallis, Sean. 2019. Comparing χ2 Tables for Separability of Distribution and Effect. Meta-Tests for Comparing Homogeneity and Goodness of Fit Contingency Test Outcomes. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 26(4). 330–55.Google Scholar
Wallis, Sean. 2021. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A New Approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edwin Bidwell. 1927. Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 22(158). 209–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Further Reading
Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C. 1982. A Primer in Data Reduction. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Chapter 7.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E. 2014. Progress in Regression: Why Natural Language Data Calls for Mixed-Effects Models. Unpublished manuscript. www.danielezrajohnson.com/johnson_2014b.pdf.Google Scholar
Lohr, Sharon L. 2019. Sampling: Design and Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Chapters 2, 3, 5 and 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Chapter 8.Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo. 2020. Statistics for Linguistics. New York: Routledge. Chapters 14 and 15.Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo, and Grice, Martine. 2021. Independence and Generalizability in Linguistics. Linguistics 59(5). 1251–77.Google Scholar
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 2013. Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 2015. Analysing Discourse Markers in Spoken Corpora: Actually as a Case Study. In Baker, Paul and McEnery, Tony, eds. Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 88–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amrhein, Valentin, Trafimow, David and Greenland, Sander. 2019. Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication. The American Statistician, 73(sup1). 262–70. https://doi:10.1080/00031305.2018.1543137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Gisle. 2010. How to Use Corpus Linguistics in Sociolinguistics. In O’Keeffe, Anne and McCarthy, Michael, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. New York: Routledge. 547–62.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2010. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav. 2018. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav, Love, Robbie and Aijmer, Karin, eds. 2018. Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürkner, Paul-Christian. 2017. brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software 80(1). 1–28.Google Scholar
Crowdy, Steve. 1995. The BNC Spoken Corpus. In Leech, Geoffrey, Myers, Greg and Thomas, Jenny, eds. Spoken English on Computer: Transcription, Mark-Up and Annotation. Harlow: Longman. 224–34.Google Scholar
Desagulier, Guillaume. 2017. Corpus Linguistics and Statistics with R: Introduction to Quantitative Methods in Linguistics. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Desgraupes, Bernard, and Loiseau, Sylvain. 2018. rcqp: Interface to the Corpus Query Protocol. R package version 0.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rcqp.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C. 1982. A Primer in Data Reduction. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan. 2006. How Random Is a Corpus? The Library Metaphor. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54(2). 177–90.Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan, and Hardie, Andrew. 2011. Twenty-First Century Corpus Workbench: Updating a Query Architecture for the New Millennium. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2011 Conference. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2017. Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew. 2012. CQPweb: Combining Power, Flexibility and Usability in a Corpus Analysis Tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 173. 380–409.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred. 1998. Progressive and Conservative Modern British Dialects: Evidence from the BNC. Paper presented at the 19th ICAME Conference, Newcastle, Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred, and Lukas, Sönning. 2018. A Sociolinguistic Study of Actually in Spoken British English. Paper presented at ICAME39, Tampere. https://osf.Io/472dt.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1990. The Intersection of Sex and Social Class in the Course of Linguistic Change. Language Variation and Change 2. 205–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenk, Uta. 1998. Marking Discourse Coherence: Functions of Discourse Markers in Spoken English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Lesnoff, Matthieu, and Lancelot, Renaud. 2019. aod: Analysis of Overdispersed Data. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=aod. R package version 1.3.1.Google Scholar
Love, Robbie, Dembry, Claire, Hardie, Andrew, Brezina, Vaclav and Tony, McEnery. 2017. The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and Building a Spoken Corpus of Everyday Conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3). 319–44.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mosteller, Frederick, and Wallace, David L.. 1984. Applied Bayesian Inference: The Case of The Federalist Papers. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Oh, Sun-Young. 2000. Actually and in Fact in American English: A Data-Based Analysis. English Language and Linguistics 4(2). 243–68.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Deepayan. 2008. Lattice: Multivariate Data Visualization with R. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Sönning, Lukas, and Krug, Manfred. 2021. Actually in Contemporary British Speech: Data from the Spoken BNC Corpora. https://doi.org/10.18710/A3SATC. DataverseNO, V1, UNF:6:rp13HUEAY75735Bcul7eCg== [fileUNF].Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C., and Dasher, Richard B.. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vetter, Fabian. 2021. Issues of Corpus Comparability and Register Variation in the International Corpus of English: Theories and Computer Applications. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Bamberg. doi: https://doi.org/10.20378/irb-52406.Google Scholar
Waters, Cathleen M. 2011. Social and Linguistic Correlates of Adverb Variability in English. PhD dissertation. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar