Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:37:13.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Confucian Constitutional Identity

from Part II - Comparative Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2024

Ran Hirschl
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Yaniv Roznai
Affiliation:
Reichman University, Israel
Get access

Summary

This chapter considers how Confucian values constitute constitutional identity in three Confucian-influenced countries in Asia: China, South Korea, and Singapore. Drawing on Professor Gary Jacobsohn’s framework for the comparative study of constitutional identity, this contribution argues that Confucian commitments are embodied in the formal and/or prescriptive constitutions in the three Asian jurisdictions. The constitutions’ Confucian heritages are continuously dynamic. Disharmony provokes a change in Confucian constitutional identity. The change involves not only judicial but also social and political activities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Deciphering the Genome of Constitutionalism
The Foundations and Future of Constitutional Identity
, pp. 101 - 112
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, Daniel A. 2008. China’s New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bui, Ngoc Son. 2016. “Sun Yat-Sen’s Constitutionalism.” Giornale di storia costituzionale/Journal of Constitutional History 32 (2) 157179.Google Scholar
Chengyi, Peng. 2014. Chinese Constitutionalism in a Global Context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chen-Wishart, Mindy, 2013. “Legal Transplant and Undue Influence: Lost in Translation or A Working Misunderstanding?International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62: 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2002. “Confucian Constitutionalism? The Emergence of Constitutional Review in Korea and Taiwan.” Law & Social Inquiry 27 (4): 763799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Singapore. 1991. “Shared Values (Government Printers).” Available at: https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/printheritage/detail/016ff3de-843f-4e35-8410-7d6dd3fbb66b.aspxGoogle Scholar
Ip, Eric C. 2008. “Building Constitutional Democracy on Oriental Foundations: An Anatomy of Sun Yat-sen’s Constitutionalism.” Historia Constitucional 9: 327339.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2010. Constitutional Identity Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey and Roznai, Yaniv. 2020. Constitutional Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, Yi-Huah. 2018. “Confucian Political Theory in Contemporary China.” Annual Review of Political Science 21(1): 169170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. 2015. “Public Reason Confucianism: A Construction.” American Political Science Review 109: 187200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. 2016. Public Reason Confucianism: Democratic Perfectionism and Constitutionalism in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. 2019. “From Remonstrance to Impeachment: A Curious Case of ‘Confucian Constitutionalism’ in South Korea.” Law & Social Inquiry 44: 586616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, Byong-Ik. 1996. “Confucianism in Contemporary Korea.” In Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and the Four Mini-Dragons, edited by Wei-Ming, Tu. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Chenyang. 2006. “The Confucian Ideal of Harmony.” Philosophy East and West 56 (4): 583603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Chenyang. 2014. The Confucian Philosophy of Harmony. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Minzner, Carl. 2018. End of an Era: How China’s Authoritarian Revival Is Undermining Its Rise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murthy, Viren. 2000. “The Democratic Potential of Confucian Minben Thought.” Asian Philosophy 10: 3347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, H. Jefferson. 1993. The Moral Tradition of American Constitutionalism: A Theological Interpretation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Seong-Hak Kim, Marie. 2015. “Confucianism that Confounds: Constitutional Jurisprudence on Filial Piety in Korea.” In Confucianism, Law, and Democracy in Contemporary Korea, edited by Kim, Sungmoon. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Sheehy, Benedict. 2004. “Singapore, Shared Values and Law: Non-East versus West Constitutional Hermeneutic.” Hong Kong Law Journal 34: 6782.Google Scholar
Tan, Charlene. 2012. “‘Our Shared Values’ in Singapore: A Confucian Perspective.” Educational Theory 62 (4): 449463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Eugene K. B. 2013. “Autochthonous Constitutional Design in Post-Colonial Singapore: Intimations of Confucianism and the Leviathan in Entrenching Dominant Government.” Yonsei Law Journal 4 (2): 273308.Google Scholar
Tan, Kevin Y. L. and Thio, Li-Ann. 2015. Singapore: 50 Constitutional Moments That Defined a Nation. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Editions.Google Scholar
Thio, Li-ann. 2010. “Soft Constitutional Law in Nonliberal Asian Constitutional Democracies.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 8 (4): 766799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thio, Li-ann and Tan, Kevin Y. L.. 2009. Singapore. Evolution of a Revolution: Forty Years of The Singapore Constitution. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tu, Weiming. 1984. Confucian Ethics Today: The Singapore Challenge. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.Google Scholar
Xi, Jinping. 2014. “Xi Jinping’s Speech in Commemoration of the 2,565th Anniversary of Confucius’ Birth.” China & US Focus Library, September 24, 2014. http://library.chinausfocus.com/article-1534.html.Google Scholar
Yao, Xinzhong. 2000. An Introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Hua. 2013. “When Filial Piety Is the Law.” New York Times, July 7, 2013. www.nytimes.com/2013/07/08/opinion/yu-when-filial-piety-is-the-law.html.Google Scholar
Yu, Lüxue. 2019. “Filial Support Obligations under Singapore, United States, and Chinese Law: A Comparative Study.” Frontiers of Law in China 14 (2): 164192.Google Scholar
Zhao, Dingxin. 2015. The Confucian-Legalist State: A New Theory of Chinese History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×