Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:47:08.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2009

Melissa Schwartzberg
Melissa Schwartzberg
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Democracy and Legal Change , pp. 211 - 224
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, W. C.The Writings and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell. 4 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1937–47.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Aeschines, trans. Carey, Chris. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2000.
Amar, Akhil Reed. “Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution Outside Article V.” 55 University of Chicago Law Review1043 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. “Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Amendment.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antiphon and Andocides, trans. Gagarin, Michael and MacDowell, Douglas M.. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1998.
Aquinas, Saint Thomas. Treatise on Law, trans. Richard J. Regan. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2000.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Rhetoric, trans. W. Rhys Roberts. In Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Aristotle. The Politics and the Constitution of Athens, ed. Everson, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. David Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Politics, trans. Ernest Barker. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bacon, Sir Francis. The Essayes or Counsels, Civill and Morall, ed. Kiernan, Michael. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Barber, Sotirios A.On What the Constitution Means. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Barber, Sotirios A., and George, Robert P.. Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Benda, Ernst. “The Protection of Human Dignity (Article 1 of the Basic Law).” 53 SMU Law Review443–53 (1999).Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. Rights, Representation, and Reform, ed. Schofield, P., Pease-Watkins, C., and Blamires, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard B. with Agel, Jerome. Amending America: If We Love the Constitution So Much, Why Do We Keep Trying to Change It? Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2000.Google Scholar
Boardman, Roger Sherman. Roger Sherman: Statesman and Signer. New York: Da Capo Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H.The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Free Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Brandon, Mark E. “The ‘Original’ Thirteenth Amendment and the Limits to Formal Constitutional Change.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecht, Arnold. Federalism and Regionalism in Germany: The Division of Prussia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Burgess, Glenn. The Politics of the Ancient Constitution. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. H., ed., with Goldie, Mark. The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Peter C.Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law: The Theory and Practice of Weimar Constitutionalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Cicero. On the Commonwealth and On the Laws, ed. Zetzel, James E. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L., and Arato, Andrew. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Coke, Sir Edward. The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, or, A Commentary upon Littleton. Union, NJ: Lawbook Exchange, 1999.Google Scholar
Coke, Sir Edward. La Sept Part Des Reports Sr. Edw. Coke Chiualer, Chief Justice del Common Banke, 1608.
Collier, Christopher. Roger Sherman's Connecticut: Yankee Politics and the American Revolution. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Cooley, Thomas M. “The Power to Amend the Federal Constitution.” 4 Michigan Law Journal117 (1893).Google Scholar
Cotterell, Mary. “Interregnum Law Reform: The Hale Commission of 1652.” 83 English Historical Review689–704 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, David. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Da Silva, Virgílio Afonso. “A Fossilized Constitution,” 17(4) Ratio Juris454–73 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demosthenes, . Against Meidias, Androtion, Aristocrates, Timocrates, Aristogeiton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Dodd, Walter. Revision and Amendment of State Constitutions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1910.Google Scholar
Dow, David R. “The Plain Meaning of Article V.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. “Equality, Democracy and Constitution: We the People in Court.” 28 Alberta Law Review (1990).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom's Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Eberle, Edward J. “Human Dignity, Privacy, and Personality in German and American Constitutional Law.” Utah Law Review963 (1997).Google Scholar
Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Elliot, Jonathan, ed. The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution as Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia in 1787. … 4 vols., 2nd ed. Washington: Taylor and Maury, 1836; vol. 5, Washington: Taylor and Maury, 1845.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Ulysses Unbound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An Experimental Essay Touching the Reformation of the Lawes of England. Aug. 17 1648 (E 541).
Farrand, Max, ed. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, vol. 1–3. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. “The Politics of Imperfection: The Amendment of Constitutions.” 22 Law and Social Inquiry501–31, at 504 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John and Pasquale Pasquino. “Rule of Democracy and Rule of Law.” In Democracy and the Rule of Law, eds. Maravall, José María and Przeworski, Adam. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelman, Paul. Slavery and the Founders: Race and Liberty in the Age of Jefferson. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2001.Google Scholar
Finley, Moses. The Use and Abuse of History. New York: Viking Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Finn, John E.Constitutions in Crisis: Political Violence and the Rule of Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Fisch, Jill E. “Retroactivity and Legal Change,” 110 Harvard Law Review1055 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, James E. “We the Exceptional American People.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1946, vol. 8: The Far East. Washington, DC: U.S.G.P.O., 1971.
Fornara, Charles W.Archaic Times to the End of the Peloponnesian War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Sir John. On the Laws and Governance of England, ed. Lockwood, Shelley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Fox, Gregory, and Nolte, George. “Intolerant Democracies.” 36 Harvard International Law Journal1 (1995).Google Scholar
Freehling, William W. “The Founding Fathers and Slavery,” 77 American Historical Review81–93 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. “Ordinary Meaning, Democratic Interpretation, and the Constitution.” 21(1) Philosophy and Public Affairs3–42 (1992).Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl. “Rebuilding the German Constitution, I.” 43(3) American Political Science Review461–82 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagarin, Michael. Early Greek Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. “Why Democracies May Actually Be Less Reliable Allies.” 48(4) American Journal of Political Science775–95 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor. “Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations.” 50 International Organization109–39 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golay, John Ford. The Founding of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W.A Historical Commentary on Thucydides, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Gooch, G. P.English Democratic Ideas in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Harper Torchbook, 1959.Google Scholar
Gray, Charles. “Parliament, Liberty, and the Law.” In Parliament and Liberty from the Reign of Elizabeth to the English Civil War, ed. Hexter, J. H.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Janelle. The Radical Face of the Ancient Constitution: St. Edward's ‘Laws’ in Early Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, with Rehg, William. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” 29(6) Political Theory766–81 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Sir Matthew. “Considerations Touching the Amendment or Alteration of Laws.” In A Collection of Legal Tracts Relating to the Law of England, vol. 1, ed. Hargrave, Francis. London: Printed by T. Wright, 1787.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, Clifford. New York: Penguin Books, [1788] 1961.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mogens Herman. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mogens Herman. “Nomos and Psephisma in Fourth-Century Athens,” 19 Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies315–30 (1978).Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Phillip. From the End of the Peloponnesian War to the Battle of Ipsus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, James. The Political Works of James Harrington, ed. Pocock, J. G. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Harris, William F.The Interpretable Constitution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Harrison, A. R. W. “Law-Making at Athens at the End of the Fifth Century BC.” 75 Journal of Hellenic Studies26–35 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.Law, Legislation, and Liberty, vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Heath, G. D. III. “Making the Instrument of Government.” 6 Journal of British Studies at 31 (1967).Google Scholar
Hedrick, Charles W. Jr. “Democracy and the Athenian Epigraphic Habit.” 68(3) Hesperia387–439 (1999).Google Scholar
Herodotus, . The Histories, trans. Aubrey de Selincourt. London: Penguin Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Hirst, Derek. England in Conflict, 1603–1660. London: Arnold, 1999.Google Scholar
Hirst, Derek. “The Lord Protector, 1653–1658.” In Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution, ed. Morrill, John. London: Longman, 1990.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen, and Cass Sunstein. “The Politics of Revision.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, Simon. The Greek World 479–323 B.C.London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Huber, Gregory, and Gordon, Sanford. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office? 48(2) American Journal of Political Science247–63 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hucko, Elmar M., ed. The Democratic Tradition: Four German Constitutions. Leamington Spa, England: Berg Publishers, 1987.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, William T., Racahl, William M. E., Rutland, et al Robert., eds. The Papers of James Madison (17 vols.). Chicago and Charlottesville: University of Chicago Press and University of Virginia Press, 1962–1991.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. “Symposium: Borrowing: The Permeability of Constitutional Borders,” 82 Texas Law Review1763 (2004).Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. Apple of Gold: Constitutionalism in Israel and in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Arthur J., and Schlink, Bernhard. Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. “Symposium: Borrowing: The Permeability of Constitutional Borders,” 82 Tex. L.R. 1763.
Johnson, James. “What the Politics of Enfranchisement Can Tell Us About How Rational Choice Theorists Study Institutions.” In Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism, eds. Katznelson, Ira and Weingast, Barry R.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2005.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Karpen. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany: Essays on the Basic Rights and Principles of the Basic Law With a Translation of the Basic Law. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1988.Google Scholar
Katz, Elai. “On Amending Constitutions: The Legality and Legitimacy of Constitutional Entrenchment,” 29 Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems251–92 (1996).Google Scholar
Kelly, Duncan. The State of the Political: Conceptions of Politics and the State in the Thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Franz Neumann. Oxford: British Academy/Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Julius Springer, 1925.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie. Tubingen, Germany: Verlag von J. C. B. Mohr, 1929.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State, trans. Andres Wedberg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Kennan, George F.At a Century's Ending: Reflections 1982–1995. New York: Norton, 1996.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack. “Institutionalizing Constitutional Interpretation.” In Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule, ed. Ferejohn, John, Rakove, Jack N., and Riley, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jack. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Adrienne, and Peden, William. The Life and Selected Writings of Thomas Jefferson. New York: Modern Library, 1993.Google Scholar
Koch, H. W.A Constitutional History of Germany in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. London: Longman, 1984.Google Scholar
Kokott, Juliane. “From Reception and Transplantation to Convergence of Constitutional Models in the Age of Globalization.” In Constitutionalism, Universalism, and Democracy: A Comparative Analysis, ed. Starck, Christian. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1999.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald P.The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2nd edition, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997; 1st edition, 1989.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald P. “Germany: Balancing Rights and Duties.” In Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study, ed. Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kurland, Philip B., and Lerner, Ralph. The Founders' Constitution, vol. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1987.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles. “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism.” 96(12) Journal of Philosophy599–625 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law's Discovery, June 27, 1653, E 702 (18).
The Lawyers Bane or the Laws Reformation and New Model, Aug. 13, 1647, E401 (36).
Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774–1789, ed. Smith, Paul H.. Washington: Library of Congress, 1976–2000.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. “How Many Times Has the United States Constitution Been Amended? (A) 26; (B) 26; (C) 27; (D) >27: Accounting for Constitution Change.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. “The Athenian Coinage Decree.” In Selected Papers in Greek and Near Eastern History, ed. Rhodes, P. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Lewis, David M. “Entrenchment-Clauses in Attic Decrees.” In Phoros: Tribute to Benjamin Dean Meritt, ed. Bradeen, Donald William and McGregor, Malcolm Francis. Locust Valley, NY: J. J. Augustin, 1974.Google Scholar
Lilburne, John. The Just Man's Justification, June 6, 1646, E 340 (12).
Loewenstein, Karl. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights I.” 31(3) American Political Science Review417–32 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, Karl. Über Wesen, Technik, und Grenzen der Verfassungsänderung. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDowell, Douglas M. “Law-Making at Athens in the Fourth Century B.C.,” 95 Journal of Hellenic Studies62–74 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDowell, Douglas M.The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
MacDowell, Douglas M.The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
MacDowell, Douglas M.Spartan Law. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. Liberal Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
MacGilvray, Eric A.Reconstructing Public Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Madison, James. Writings, ed. Rakove, Jack. New York: Library of America, 1999.Google Scholar
Maltz, Earl. “Slavery, Federalism, and the Structure of the Constitution.” 36 American Journal of Legal History466–98 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, Bernard. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation,” 15(3) Political Theory338–68 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marbury, William. “The Limitations upon the Amending Power.” 33 Harvard Law Review223–35 (1919).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Richard K.If Men Were Angels: James Madison and the Heartless Empire of Reason. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995.Google Scholar
Mattingly, Harold. The Athenian Empire Restored. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P.Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlwain, Charles Howard. The High Court of Parliament. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1910.Google Scholar
Meier, Christian. Athens: A Portrait of the City in Its Golden Age. New York: Henry Holt, 1993.Google Scholar
Meiggs, Russell, and Lewis, David. A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions to the End of the Fifth Century B.C. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Merkl, Peter H.The Origin of the West German Republic. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963–91.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. “Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy.” In Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism, ed. Dyzenhaus, David. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter. “An Ordering of Constitutional Values.” 53 Southern California Law Review703–60 (1980).Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. “Merlin's Memory: The Past and Future Imperfect of the Once and Future Polity.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedham, Marchamont. Mercurius Politicus, no. 73, Oct. 23–30, 1651. E644 (5).
Nedham, Marchamont. True State of the Commonwealth. 1654. E728 (5)
Ober, Josiah. The Athenian Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah, and Hedrick, Charles. Demokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Office of Military Government for Germany (United States), Civil Administration Division. Documents on the Creation of the German Federal Constitution. Sept. 1, 1949.
Orfield, Lester Bernhardt. The Amending of the Federal Constitution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Ostwald, Martin. From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Der Parlamentarische Rat 1948–1949: Akten und Protokolle, ed. Wagner, Johannes Volker. Boppard am Rhein, Germany: Boldt, 1995.Google Scholar
Plato, . The Laws, trans. Trevor J. Saunders. London: Penguin Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Plato, . Statesman, trans. J. B. Skemp; revised and introduced by Martin Ostwald. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.Google Scholar
Plutarch. Lives, ed. Clough, Arthur Hugh, trans. John Dryden. New York: Mondern Library, 2001.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A.The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A.The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Preuss, Ulrich K. “Political Order and Democracy: Carl Schmitt and His Influence.” In The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, ed. Mouffe, Chantal. London: Verso, 1999, pp. 155–79.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack N.Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Vintage Books, 1997.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Reed, William. “Alliance Duration and Democracy: An Extension and Cross-Validation of ‘Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations.’” 41 American Journal of Political Science1072–78 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, P. J., with Lewis, David. The Decrees of the Greek States. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Robinson, Henry. Certain Proposals in Order to a New Modelling of the Lawes and Law-Proceedings. London: Printed by M. Simmons, 1653.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michel. “Can Rights, Democracy and Justice Be Reconciled Through Discourse Theory? Reflections of Habermas's Proceduralist Paradigm of Law.” 17 Cardozo Law Review791–824 (1996).Google Scholar
Ross, Alf. “On Self-Reference and a Puzzle in Constitutional Law.” 78 Mind1–24 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhm von Oppen, Beate. Documents on Germany under Occupation, 1945–54. London: Oxford University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Ryder, T. T. B.Koine Eirene. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Sanderson, John. Biography of the Signers to the Declaration of Independence. Philadelphia: R. W. Pomeroy, 1823–27.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Arlene W.Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924–1954: Materialien zu einer Verfassungslehre. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1958.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology, trans. George Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, trans. Ellen Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Legality and Legitimacy, trans. Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. “Jeremy Bentham on Fallibility and Infallibity.” Journal of the History of Ideas. Forthcoming.
Seaberg, R. B. “The Norman Conquest and the Common Law: The Levellers and the Argument from Continuity.” 24 Historical Journal791–806 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sealey, Raphael. The Athenian Republic: Democracy or Rule of Law? University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Sealey, Raphael. “On the Athenian Concept of Law,” 77 Classical Journal289–302 (1982).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara. “Law Reform in Seventeenth Century England.” 19 American Journal of Legal History280–312 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara. “Sir Francis Bacon and the Mid-Seventeenth Century Movement for Law Reform.” 24 American Journal of Legal History331–362 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Andrew, ed. The English Levellers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, Garrett Ward. The Political Philosophy of James Madison. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Visions of Politics: Volume 3: Hobbes and Civil Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P. “Cromwell and His Contemporaries.” In Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution, ed. Morrill, John. London: Longman, 1990.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P.Politics and Ideology in England 1603–1640. London: Longman, 1986.Google Scholar
Steinberger, Helmut. “Historical Influences of American Constitutionalism upon German Constitutional Development: Federalism and Judicial Review.” 36 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law189 (1997).Google Scholar
Steinberger, Helmut. “American Contitutionalism and German Constitutional Development.” In Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution Abroad, Henkin, Louis and Rosenthal, Albert J., eds. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. “Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model.” 10(4) Journal of Democracy19–34 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Ronald S.The Athenian Grain-Tax Law of 374/3 B.C.Princeton, NJ: American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 1998.Google Scholar
Suber, Peter. The Paradox of Self-Amendment. New York: Peter Lang, 1990.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R.Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Takayanagi, Kenzo, Ohtomo, Ichiro, and Tanaka, Hideo. The Making of the Constitution of Japan, vol. 1: Documents. Tokyo: Yuhikaku, 1972.Google Scholar
Thoma, Richard. “The Reich as Democracy,” trans. Peter C. Caldwell. In Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, eds. Jacobson, Arthur and Schlink, Bernhard. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Thucydides. The Landmark Thucydides, trans. Richard Crawley, ed. Strassler, Robert B.. New York: Free Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America, trans. and eds. Mansfield, Harvey C. and Winthrop, Delba. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Tod, M. N.A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford Uniiversity Press, 1946, 1948.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C.The Shape of Athenian Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. Natural Rights Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Veall, Donald. The Popular Movement for Law Reform, 1640–60. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Vile, John R.The Constitutional Amending Process in American Political Thought. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1992.Google Scholar
Vile, John R.Constitutional Change in the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1994.Google Scholar
Vile, John R. “The Case against Implicit Limits on the Constitutional Amending Process.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vile, John R.Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments, and Amending Issues, 1789–2002, 2nd ed. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, 2003.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warr, John. The Corruption and Deficiency of the Lawes of England Soberly Discovered. June 11, 1649. London: T. Osborne.Google Scholar
Weston, Corinne. “England: Ancient Constitution and Common Law.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H., with Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon S.The Creation of the American Republic 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Woolrych, Austin. Commonwealth to Protectorate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Wootton, David. “Leveller Democracy and the Puritan Revolution.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H., with Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wootton, David, ed. Divine Right and Democracy. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books, 1986.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. “Republicanism, Regicide, and Republic: The English Experience.” In Republicanism, vol. 1, ed. Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. The Rump Parliament: 1648–1653. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xenophon, . Xenophon in Seven Volumes, vol. 7, trans. E. C. Marchand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Yack, Bernard. The Problems of a Political Animal. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Zaret, David. Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions, and the Public Sphere in Early-Modern England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Abbott, W. C.The Writings and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell. 4 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1937–47.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Aeschines, trans. Carey, Chris. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2000.
Amar, Akhil Reed. “Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution Outside Article V.” 55 University of Chicago Law Review1043 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. “Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Amendment.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antiphon and Andocides, trans. Gagarin, Michael and MacDowell, Douglas M.. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1998.
Aquinas, Saint Thomas. Treatise on Law, trans. Richard J. Regan. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2000.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Rhetoric, trans. W. Rhys Roberts. In Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Aristotle. The Politics and the Constitution of Athens, ed. Everson, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. David Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Politics, trans. Ernest Barker. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bacon, Sir Francis. The Essayes or Counsels, Civill and Morall, ed. Kiernan, Michael. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Barber, Sotirios A.On What the Constitution Means. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Barber, Sotirios A., and George, Robert P.. Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Benda, Ernst. “The Protection of Human Dignity (Article 1 of the Basic Law).” 53 SMU Law Review443–53 (1999).Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. Rights, Representation, and Reform, ed. Schofield, P., Pease-Watkins, C., and Blamires, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard B. with Agel, Jerome. Amending America: If We Love the Constitution So Much, Why Do We Keep Trying to Change It? Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2000.Google Scholar
Boardman, Roger Sherman. Roger Sherman: Statesman and Signer. New York: Da Capo Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H.The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Free Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Brandon, Mark E. “The ‘Original’ Thirteenth Amendment and the Limits to Formal Constitutional Change.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecht, Arnold. Federalism and Regionalism in Germany: The Division of Prussia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Burgess, Glenn. The Politics of the Ancient Constitution. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. H., ed., with Goldie, Mark. The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Peter C.Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law: The Theory and Practice of Weimar Constitutionalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Cicero. On the Commonwealth and On the Laws, ed. Zetzel, James E. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L., and Arato, Andrew. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Coke, Sir Edward. The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, or, A Commentary upon Littleton. Union, NJ: Lawbook Exchange, 1999.Google Scholar
Coke, Sir Edward. La Sept Part Des Reports Sr. Edw. Coke Chiualer, Chief Justice del Common Banke, 1608.
Collier, Christopher. Roger Sherman's Connecticut: Yankee Politics and the American Revolution. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Cooley, Thomas M. “The Power to Amend the Federal Constitution.” 4 Michigan Law Journal117 (1893).Google Scholar
Cotterell, Mary. “Interregnum Law Reform: The Hale Commission of 1652.” 83 English Historical Review689–704 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, David. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Da Silva, Virgílio Afonso. “A Fossilized Constitution,” 17(4) Ratio Juris454–73 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demosthenes, . Against Meidias, Androtion, Aristocrates, Timocrates, Aristogeiton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Dodd, Walter. Revision and Amendment of State Constitutions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1910.Google Scholar
Dow, David R. “The Plain Meaning of Article V.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. “Equality, Democracy and Constitution: We the People in Court.” 28 Alberta Law Review (1990).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom's Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Eberle, Edward J. “Human Dignity, Privacy, and Personality in German and American Constitutional Law.” Utah Law Review963 (1997).Google Scholar
Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Elliot, Jonathan, ed. The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution as Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia in 1787. … 4 vols., 2nd ed. Washington: Taylor and Maury, 1836; vol. 5, Washington: Taylor and Maury, 1845.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Ulysses Unbound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An Experimental Essay Touching the Reformation of the Lawes of England. Aug. 17 1648 (E 541).
Farrand, Max, ed. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, vol. 1–3. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. “The Politics of Imperfection: The Amendment of Constitutions.” 22 Law and Social Inquiry501–31, at 504 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John and Pasquale Pasquino. “Rule of Democracy and Rule of Law.” In Democracy and the Rule of Law, eds. Maravall, José María and Przeworski, Adam. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelman, Paul. Slavery and the Founders: Race and Liberty in the Age of Jefferson. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2001.Google Scholar
Finley, Moses. The Use and Abuse of History. New York: Viking Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Finn, John E.Constitutions in Crisis: Political Violence and the Rule of Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Fisch, Jill E. “Retroactivity and Legal Change,” 110 Harvard Law Review1055 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, James E. “We the Exceptional American People.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States 1946, vol. 8: The Far East. Washington, DC: U.S.G.P.O., 1971.
Fornara, Charles W.Archaic Times to the End of the Peloponnesian War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Sir John. On the Laws and Governance of England, ed. Lockwood, Shelley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Fox, Gregory, and Nolte, George. “Intolerant Democracies.” 36 Harvard International Law Journal1 (1995).Google Scholar
Freehling, William W. “The Founding Fathers and Slavery,” 77 American Historical Review81–93 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. “Ordinary Meaning, Democratic Interpretation, and the Constitution.” 21(1) Philosophy and Public Affairs3–42 (1992).Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl. “Rebuilding the German Constitution, I.” 43(3) American Political Science Review461–82 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagarin, Michael. Early Greek Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. “Why Democracies May Actually Be Less Reliable Allies.” 48(4) American Journal of Political Science775–95 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor. “Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations.” 50 International Organization109–39 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golay, John Ford. The Founding of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W.A Historical Commentary on Thucydides, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Gooch, G. P.English Democratic Ideas in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Harper Torchbook, 1959.Google Scholar
Gray, Charles. “Parliament, Liberty, and the Law.” In Parliament and Liberty from the Reign of Elizabeth to the English Civil War, ed. Hexter, J. H.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Janelle. The Radical Face of the Ancient Constitution: St. Edward's ‘Laws’ in Early Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, with Rehg, William. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” 29(6) Political Theory766–81 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Sir Matthew. “Considerations Touching the Amendment or Alteration of Laws.” In A Collection of Legal Tracts Relating to the Law of England, vol. 1, ed. Hargrave, Francis. London: Printed by T. Wright, 1787.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, Clifford. New York: Penguin Books, [1788] 1961.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mogens Herman. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mogens Herman. “Nomos and Psephisma in Fourth-Century Athens,” 19 Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies315–30 (1978).Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Phillip. From the End of the Peloponnesian War to the Battle of Ipsus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, James. The Political Works of James Harrington, ed. Pocock, J. G. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Harris, William F.The Interpretable Constitution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Harrison, A. R. W. “Law-Making at Athens at the End of the Fifth Century BC.” 75 Journal of Hellenic Studies26–35 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.Law, Legislation, and Liberty, vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Heath, G. D. III. “Making the Instrument of Government.” 6 Journal of British Studies at 31 (1967).Google Scholar
Hedrick, Charles W. Jr. “Democracy and the Athenian Epigraphic Habit.” 68(3) Hesperia387–439 (1999).Google Scholar
Herodotus, . The Histories, trans. Aubrey de Selincourt. London: Penguin Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Hirst, Derek. England in Conflict, 1603–1660. London: Arnold, 1999.Google Scholar
Hirst, Derek. “The Lord Protector, 1653–1658.” In Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution, ed. Morrill, John. London: Longman, 1990.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen, and Cass Sunstein. “The Politics of Revision.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, Simon. The Greek World 479–323 B.C.London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Huber, Gregory, and Gordon, Sanford. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office? 48(2) American Journal of Political Science247–63 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hucko, Elmar M., ed. The Democratic Tradition: Four German Constitutions. Leamington Spa, England: Berg Publishers, 1987.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, William T., Racahl, William M. E., Rutland, et al Robert., eds. The Papers of James Madison (17 vols.). Chicago and Charlottesville: University of Chicago Press and University of Virginia Press, 1962–1991.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. “Symposium: Borrowing: The Permeability of Constitutional Borders,” 82 Texas Law Review1763 (2004).Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. Apple of Gold: Constitutionalism in Israel and in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Arthur J., and Schlink, Bernhard. Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. “Symposium: Borrowing: The Permeability of Constitutional Borders,” 82 Tex. L.R. 1763.
Johnson, James. “What the Politics of Enfranchisement Can Tell Us About How Rational Choice Theorists Study Institutions.” In Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism, eds. Katznelson, Ira and Weingast, Barry R.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2005.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Karpen. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany: Essays on the Basic Rights and Principles of the Basic Law With a Translation of the Basic Law. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1988.Google Scholar
Katz, Elai. “On Amending Constitutions: The Legality and Legitimacy of Constitutional Entrenchment,” 29 Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems251–92 (1996).Google Scholar
Kelly, Duncan. The State of the Political: Conceptions of Politics and the State in the Thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Franz Neumann. Oxford: British Academy/Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Julius Springer, 1925.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie. Tubingen, Germany: Verlag von J. C. B. Mohr, 1929.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State, trans. Andres Wedberg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Kennan, George F.At a Century's Ending: Reflections 1982–1995. New York: Norton, 1996.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack. “Institutionalizing Constitutional Interpretation.” In Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule, ed. Ferejohn, John, Rakove, Jack N., and Riley, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jack. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Adrienne, and Peden, William. The Life and Selected Writings of Thomas Jefferson. New York: Modern Library, 1993.Google Scholar
Koch, H. W.A Constitutional History of Germany in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. London: Longman, 1984.Google Scholar
Kokott, Juliane. “From Reception and Transplantation to Convergence of Constitutional Models in the Age of Globalization.” In Constitutionalism, Universalism, and Democracy: A Comparative Analysis, ed. Starck, Christian. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1999.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald P.The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2nd edition, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997; 1st edition, 1989.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald P. “Germany: Balancing Rights and Duties.” In Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study, ed. Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kurland, Philip B., and Lerner, Ralph. The Founders' Constitution, vol. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1987.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles. “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism.” 96(12) Journal of Philosophy599–625 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law's Discovery, June 27, 1653, E 702 (18).
The Lawyers Bane or the Laws Reformation and New Model, Aug. 13, 1647, E401 (36).
Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774–1789, ed. Smith, Paul H.. Washington: Library of Congress, 1976–2000.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. “How Many Times Has the United States Constitution Been Amended? (A) 26; (B) 26; (C) 27; (D) >27: Accounting for Constitution Change.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. “The Athenian Coinage Decree.” In Selected Papers in Greek and Near Eastern History, ed. Rhodes, P. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Lewis, David M. “Entrenchment-Clauses in Attic Decrees.” In Phoros: Tribute to Benjamin Dean Meritt, ed. Bradeen, Donald William and McGregor, Malcolm Francis. Locust Valley, NY: J. J. Augustin, 1974.Google Scholar
Lilburne, John. The Just Man's Justification, June 6, 1646, E 340 (12).
Loewenstein, Karl. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights I.” 31(3) American Political Science Review417–32 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, Karl. Über Wesen, Technik, und Grenzen der Verfassungsänderung. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDowell, Douglas M. “Law-Making at Athens in the Fourth Century B.C.,” 95 Journal of Hellenic Studies62–74 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDowell, Douglas M.The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
MacDowell, Douglas M.The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
MacDowell, Douglas M.Spartan Law. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. Liberal Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
MacGilvray, Eric A.Reconstructing Public Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Madison, James. Writings, ed. Rakove, Jack. New York: Library of America, 1999.Google Scholar
Maltz, Earl. “Slavery, Federalism, and the Structure of the Constitution.” 36 American Journal of Legal History466–98 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, Bernard. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation,” 15(3) Political Theory338–68 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marbury, William. “The Limitations upon the Amending Power.” 33 Harvard Law Review223–35 (1919).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Richard K.If Men Were Angels: James Madison and the Heartless Empire of Reason. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995.Google Scholar
Mattingly, Harold. The Athenian Empire Restored. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P.Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlwain, Charles Howard. The High Court of Parliament. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1910.Google Scholar
Meier, Christian. Athens: A Portrait of the City in Its Golden Age. New York: Henry Holt, 1993.Google Scholar
Meiggs, Russell, and Lewis, David. A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions to the End of the Fifth Century B.C. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Merkl, Peter H.The Origin of the West German Republic. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963–91.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. “Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy.” In Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism, ed. Dyzenhaus, David. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter. “An Ordering of Constitutional Values.” 53 Southern California Law Review703–60 (1980).Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. “Merlin's Memory: The Past and Future Imperfect of the Once and Future Polity.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedham, Marchamont. Mercurius Politicus, no. 73, Oct. 23–30, 1651. E644 (5).
Nedham, Marchamont. True State of the Commonwealth. 1654. E728 (5)
Ober, Josiah. The Athenian Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah, and Hedrick, Charles. Demokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Office of Military Government for Germany (United States), Civil Administration Division. Documents on the Creation of the German Federal Constitution. Sept. 1, 1949.
Orfield, Lester Bernhardt. The Amending of the Federal Constitution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Ostwald, Martin. From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Der Parlamentarische Rat 1948–1949: Akten und Protokolle, ed. Wagner, Johannes Volker. Boppard am Rhein, Germany: Boldt, 1995.Google Scholar
Plato, . The Laws, trans. Trevor J. Saunders. London: Penguin Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Plato, . Statesman, trans. J. B. Skemp; revised and introduced by Martin Ostwald. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.Google Scholar
Plutarch. Lives, ed. Clough, Arthur Hugh, trans. John Dryden. New York: Mondern Library, 2001.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A.The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A.The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Preuss, Ulrich K. “Political Order and Democracy: Carl Schmitt and His Influence.” In The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, ed. Mouffe, Chantal. London: Verso, 1999, pp. 155–79.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack N.Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Vintage Books, 1997.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Reed, William. “Alliance Duration and Democracy: An Extension and Cross-Validation of ‘Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations.’” 41 American Journal of Political Science1072–78 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, P. J., with Lewis, David. The Decrees of the Greek States. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Robinson, Henry. Certain Proposals in Order to a New Modelling of the Lawes and Law-Proceedings. London: Printed by M. Simmons, 1653.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michel. “Can Rights, Democracy and Justice Be Reconciled Through Discourse Theory? Reflections of Habermas's Proceduralist Paradigm of Law.” 17 Cardozo Law Review791–824 (1996).Google Scholar
Ross, Alf. “On Self-Reference and a Puzzle in Constitutional Law.” 78 Mind1–24 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhm von Oppen, Beate. Documents on Germany under Occupation, 1945–54. London: Oxford University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Ryder, T. T. B.Koine Eirene. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Sanderson, John. Biography of the Signers to the Declaration of Independence. Philadelphia: R. W. Pomeroy, 1823–27.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Arlene W.Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924–1954: Materialien zu einer Verfassungslehre. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1958.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology, trans. George Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, trans. Ellen Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Legality and Legitimacy, trans. Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. “Jeremy Bentham on Fallibility and Infallibity.” Journal of the History of Ideas. Forthcoming.
Seaberg, R. B. “The Norman Conquest and the Common Law: The Levellers and the Argument from Continuity.” 24 Historical Journal791–806 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sealey, Raphael. The Athenian Republic: Democracy or Rule of Law? University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Sealey, Raphael. “On the Athenian Concept of Law,” 77 Classical Journal289–302 (1982).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara. “Law Reform in Seventeenth Century England.” 19 American Journal of Legal History280–312 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara. “Sir Francis Bacon and the Mid-Seventeenth Century Movement for Law Reform.” 24 American Journal of Legal History331–362 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Andrew, ed. The English Levellers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, Garrett Ward. The Political Philosophy of James Madison. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Visions of Politics: Volume 3: Hobbes and Civil Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P. “Cromwell and His Contemporaries.” In Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution, ed. Morrill, John. London: Longman, 1990.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P.Politics and Ideology in England 1603–1640. London: Longman, 1986.Google Scholar
Steinberger, Helmut. “Historical Influences of American Constitutionalism upon German Constitutional Development: Federalism and Judicial Review.” 36 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law189 (1997).Google Scholar
Steinberger, Helmut. “American Contitutionalism and German Constitutional Development.” In Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution Abroad, Henkin, Louis and Rosenthal, Albert J., eds. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. “Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model.” 10(4) Journal of Democracy19–34 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Ronald S.The Athenian Grain-Tax Law of 374/3 B.C.Princeton, NJ: American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 1998.Google Scholar
Suber, Peter. The Paradox of Self-Amendment. New York: Peter Lang, 1990.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R.Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Takayanagi, Kenzo, Ohtomo, Ichiro, and Tanaka, Hideo. The Making of the Constitution of Japan, vol. 1: Documents. Tokyo: Yuhikaku, 1972.Google Scholar
Thoma, Richard. “The Reich as Democracy,” trans. Peter C. Caldwell. In Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, eds. Jacobson, Arthur and Schlink, Bernhard. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Thucydides. The Landmark Thucydides, trans. Richard Crawley, ed. Strassler, Robert B.. New York: Free Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America, trans. and eds. Mansfield, Harvey C. and Winthrop, Delba. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Tod, M. N.A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford Uniiversity Press, 1946, 1948.Google Scholar
Todd, S. C.The Shape of Athenian Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. Natural Rights Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Veall, Donald. The Popular Movement for Law Reform, 1640–60. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Vile, John R.The Constitutional Amending Process in American Political Thought. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1992.Google Scholar
Vile, John R.Constitutional Change in the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1994.Google Scholar
Vile, John R. “The Case against Implicit Limits on the Constitutional Amending Process.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vile, John R.Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments, and Amending Issues, 1789–2002, 2nd ed. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, 2003.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warr, John. The Corruption and Deficiency of the Lawes of England Soberly Discovered. June 11, 1649. London: T. Osborne.Google Scholar
Weston, Corinne. “England: Ancient Constitution and Common Law.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H., with Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon S.The Creation of the American Republic 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Woolrych, Austin. Commonwealth to Protectorate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Wootton, David. “Leveller Democracy and the Puritan Revolution.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H., with Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wootton, David, ed. Divine Right and Democracy. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books, 1986.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. “Republicanism, Regicide, and Republic: The English Experience.” In Republicanism, vol. 1, ed. Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. The Rump Parliament: 1648–1653. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xenophon, . Xenophon in Seven Volumes, vol. 7, trans. E. C. Marchand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Yack, Bernard. The Problems of a Political Animal. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Zaret, David. Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions, and the Public Sphere in Early-Modern England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Melissa Schwartzberg, Columbia University, New York
  • Book: Democracy and Legal Change
  • Online publication: 24 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509681.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Melissa Schwartzberg, Columbia University, New York
  • Book: Democracy and Legal Change
  • Online publication: 24 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509681.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Melissa Schwartzberg, Columbia University, New York
  • Book: Democracy and Legal Change
  • Online publication: 24 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509681.007
Available formats
×