Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- The Very Idea of Popular Sovereignty: “We the People” Reconsidered
- Quasi-Rights: Participatory Citizenship and Negative Liberties in Democratic Athens
- Is There a Duty to Vote?
- Postmodern Liberalism and the Expressive Function of Law
- Democratic Epistemology and Accountability
- Political Quality
- Why Deliberative Democracy Is Different
- The Institutions of Deliberative Democracy
- Democracy as a Telos
- Radical Democracy, Personal Freedom, and the Transformative Potential of Politics
- Democracy and Value Pluralism
- The Problem of Russian Democracy: Can Russia Rise Again?
- Index
Democratic Epistemology and Accountability
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 May 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- The Very Idea of Popular Sovereignty: “We the People” Reconsidered
- Quasi-Rights: Participatory Citizenship and Negative Liberties in Democratic Athens
- Is There a Duty to Vote?
- Postmodern Liberalism and the Expressive Function of Law
- Democratic Epistemology and Accountability
- Political Quality
- Why Deliberative Democracy Is Different
- The Institutions of Deliberative Democracy
- Democracy as a Telos
- Radical Democracy, Personal Freedom, and the Transformative Potential of Politics
- Democracy and Value Pluralism
- The Problem of Russian Democracy: Can Russia Rise Again?
- Index
Summary
STREET-LEVEL EPISTEMOLOGY
Most of the knowledge of an ordinary person has a very messy structure and cannot meet standard epistemological criteria for its justification. Rather, a street-level epistemology makes sense of ordinary knowledge. Street-level epistemology is a subjective account of knowledge, not a public account. It is not about what counts as knowledge in, say, physics, but deals rather, with your knowledge, my knowledge, the ordinary person's knowledge. I wish not to elaborate this view here, but to apply it to the problems of representative democracy. I will briefly lay out the central implications of a street-level epistemology and then bring it to bear on democratic citizenship, especially on the problem of the citizen's holding elected officials accountable for their actions.
Standard philosophical epistemology is concerned with justification, that is, justification of any claim that some piece of putative knowledge is actually true. Street-level epistemology is economic; it is not generally about justification but about usefulness. It follows John Dewey's “pragmatic rule,” which is: In order to discover the meaning of an idea, ask for its consequences. In essence, a street-level epistemology applies this to the idea of knowledge, with consequences broadly defined to include the full costs and benefits of coming to know and using knowledge. Note that the pragmatic or street-level epistemology sounds like an economic theory; but it is not an economic theory that presumes full knowledge, as in rational expectations theory or much of game theory.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Democracy , pp. 110 - 126Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000