Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:53:57.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Family–genetic aspects of juvenile affective disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Ian M. Goodyer
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Important among the distinguishing features of juvenile mood disorders are significant social morbidity, protracted courses of recovery, possibly indicative of greater resistance to currently available treatment modalities, an unusually high propensity for manic switches, and episode recurrence (Birmaher et al., 1996; Strober, 1996). These sobering ‘truths’ are underlined further by epidemiological data showing that affective disorders are becoming increasingly prevalent in the juvenile population, suggesting earlier ages of onset in those at risk (Klerman & Weissman, 1989). Factors accounting for these temporal changes in rates of illness are little understood, although both genetic and environmental effects can be assumed. The validity of these conditions as diagnostic entities in young people remains an important area for further research.

Disturbances of mood in young people encompass a wide range of clinical phenomena and associated risk factors. Similarities in the syndromic expression of depression in juveniles and adults are well documented (Ryan et al., 1987), but homogeneity of phenotype does not mean there is a single common disorder across all age groups. For example, while prepubertal major depression seems to breed true over time and recur through adolescence (Kovacs et al., 1984; Hammen et al., 1990), one follow-up study focusing on the adult psychiatric status of children and adolescents with depression showed that prospective continuity with adult major depression was considerably stronger among postpubertal subjects (Harrington et al., 1990). A subsequent analysis of data from this cohort illustrates, as well, how immensely important it is to take account of nondepressive comorbid states in mapping developmental linkages in efforts to establish nosological validity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×