Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: Where the sweet spot is: Studying diversity in organizations
- Part I Conceptual foundations
- Part II Emerging theoretical approaches
- 4 Identity negotiation processes amidst diversity
- 5 Diversity, conflict, and their consequences
- 6 Shifting frames in team-diversity research: From difference to relationships
- 7 Putting your own down: How members of disadvantaged groups unwittingly perpetuate or exacerbate their disadvantage
- Part III Moving ahead: Agendas for practice and research
- Index
- References
6 - Shifting frames in team-diversity research: From difference to relationships
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 May 2010
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: Where the sweet spot is: Studying diversity in organizations
- Part I Conceptual foundations
- Part II Emerging theoretical approaches
- 4 Identity negotiation processes amidst diversity
- 5 Diversity, conflict, and their consequences
- 6 Shifting frames in team-diversity research: From difference to relationships
- 7 Putting your own down: How members of disadvantaged groups unwittingly perpetuate or exacerbate their disadvantage
- Part III Moving ahead: Agendas for practice and research
- Index
- References
Summary
Shifting frames in team-diversity research: From difference to relationships
Organizational research on cultural diversity in teams has tended to focus both theoretically and empirically on differences. In this research stream, diversity is typically defined as the degree of heterogeneity among team members on specified demographic dimensions; theory aims to explain how such heterogeneity affects team processes and performance (for review, see Williams and O'Reilly, 1998). An assumption underlying much of this research has been that difference per se is a source of conflict and hence that teams must minimize members' experience of different-ness from others so as to mitigate diversity's negative effects (Chatman et al., 1998; Dovidio, Kawakami, and Gaertner, 2000; Jehn, Northcraft, and Neale, 1999).
In this chapter, we reframe diversity research from a paradigm that emphasizes difference to one that emphasizes relationships. In our approach, while difference remains a defining feature of diversity, it is no longer the principle feature. Rather, our relational approach highlights the personal, interpersonal, and intergroup dynamics that influence how people interpret and act on their differences. From this perspective, difference can also be a source of creativity and resilience. This reframing has implications for how scholars conceptualize and measure diversity and for how they theorize about the conditions that influence whether diversity becomes an asset or a liability.
We define cultural diversity as differences among team members in race, ethnicity, gender, religion, nationality, or other dimensions of social identity that are marked by a history of intergroup prejudice, discrimination, or oppression.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Diversity at Work , pp. 175 - 201Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
Alderfer, C. P. (1987). An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. In (ed.), Handbook on Organizational Behavior: 190–222. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
, and (1982). Studying intergroup relations embedded in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 35–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (1999). The social situation of the black executive: Black and white identities in the corporate world. In (ed.), The Cultural Territories of Race: Black and White Boundaries: 3–29. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aron, A. (2003). Self and close relationships. In , and (eds.), Handbook of Self and Identity: 442–461. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
, , and (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1): 80–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1993). Breaking the Mold: Women, Men, and Time in the New Corporate World. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
(1996). The organizational construction of hegemonic masculinity: The case of the US Navy. Gender, Work, and Organization, 3(3): 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (1999). The self. In , , and (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edition: 680–740. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
, , , and (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5): 1225–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., and Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In , , and (eds.), Social Identity Context, Commitment, Content: 35–58. Blackwell: London.Google Scholar
(1971). The ubiquitous relationship: Attitude similarity and attraction: A cross-cultural study. Human Relations, 24(3): 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2001). The influence of demographic composition on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 956–974.Google Scholar
, , , and (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4): 749–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Real Heat: Gender and Race in the Urban Fire Service. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1980). Two indirect tactics of image management: Basking and blasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39: 406–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003). Cracking the Corporate Code: The Revealing Success Stories of 32 African-American Executives. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
Collins, P. H. (1993). Towards a new vision: Race, class and gender as categories of analysis and connection. In (ed.), Race, Sex, Class: 25–46. Memphis: The Center of Research on Women.Google Scholar
, and (1995). On West and Festermaker's “Doing Difference.” Gender and Society, 9: 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate in teams. Personnel Psychology, 55: 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
, and (2000). Songs of ourselves: Employees' deployment of social identity in workplace encounters. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(4): 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1997). Intersectionality and identity politics: Learning from violence against women of color. In and (eds.), Reconstructing Political Theory: Feminist Perspectives: 178–193. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1): 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, J., Nuer, N., Olivier, M. A., and Cohen, S. (2006). Egosystem and ecosystem: Two motivational orientations for the self. Working Paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
, and (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130: 392–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, M. N., and James, E. H. (2006). The engines of positive relationships across difference: Learning and conflict. In , and (eds.), Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
, and (1993). Numerical support, information processing and attitude change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 647–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaux, K., and Major, B. (1990). A social-psychological model of gender. In (ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference: 89–100. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., and Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Reducing contemporary prejudice: Combating explicit and implicit bias at the individual and intergroup level. In (ed.), Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination: 137–163. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. E., and Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high quality connections at work. In , , and (eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline: 263–278. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
(1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. C., and Smith, D. M. (2006). Too hot to handle? Engaging hot conflict to make better decisions and build resilient management teams. Working Paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
(1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 203–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, R. J. (1995). The role of dominant identity and experience in organizational work on diversity. In and (eds.), Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace: 161–186. Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, R. J. (2006). Managing a public image. Teaching Note # 5–406–099, Harvard Business School.
Ely, R. J., and Meyerson, D. E. (2006). Unmasking manly men: The organizational reconstruction of men's identity. Working Paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.CrossRef
, , and (2006). Rethinking political correctness. Harvard Business Review, 84: 79–87.Google ScholarPubMed
, and A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences. Academy of Management Review, forthcoming.
, and (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 229–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, R. J., Thomas, D., and Padavic, I. (2006). Team racial learning environment and the link between racial diversity and performance. Working Paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
, and (1994). Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67(2): 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flatt, S. (1993). The innovative edge. How top management team demography makes a difference. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of California at Berkeley.
Fletcher, J. K. (2003). The greatly exaggerated demise of heroic leadership: Gender, power, and the myth of the female advantage. In , , and (eds.), Reader in Gender, Work, and Organization: 204–210. Victoria, Australia: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
Grant, A. Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, forthcoming.
, , , and (2002). Time, teams and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6): 935–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , , , , and (2003). The interpersonal expression of perfection: Perfectionistic self-presentation and psychological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6): 1303–1325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holvino, E. (2001). Complicating gender: The simultaneity of race, gender and class in organizational change(ing). Simmons School of Management, Center for Gender in Organizations.
, , and (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Challenging operations: Changing interactions, identities, and institutions in a surgical teaching hospital. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cambridge MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.Google Scholar
, and (1993). Management, masculinity and manipulation: From paternalism to corporate strategy in financial services in Britain. Journal of Management Studies, 30: 659–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 569–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyerson, D. E., Ely, R., and Wernick, I. (2007). Disrupting gender, revising leadership. In and (eds.), Women and Leadership: The State of Play and Strategies for Change: 453–473. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
, and (2000). Moving out of the “armchair”: Developing a framework to bridge the gap between feminist theory and practice. Organization, 7: 589–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murmam, P., and Tushman, M. (1997). Organization responsiveness to environmental shock as an indicator of organizational foresight and oversight: The role of executive team characteristics and organization context. In , , and (eds.), Technological Innovation: Foresights and Oversights: 261–278. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). Being Asian American: Identity, cultural constructs, and stereotype perception. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33: 435–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2006). When surface and deep-level diversity collide. The effect on disserting group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 296–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed?Journal of Management, 28(2): 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 30: 685–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L. M. (2006a). From proving to becoming: How positive relationships create a context for self-discovery and self-actualization. In and (eds.), Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2006b). Shifting the lens on organizational life: The added value of positive scholarship. Academy of Management Review, 31: 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1992). Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annual Review of Psychology, 43: 133–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Reconceptualizing sexual harassment. The Yale Law Journal, 107: 1682–1805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6): 613–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5): 797–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., and Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology: 379–440. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
(1978). Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
, and (1996). Why are there so few black lawyers in corporate law firms? An institutional analysis. California Law Review, 84: 493–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, K. Y., and O'Reilly, C. A., III. (1998). Demography diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In and (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20: 77–140. Greenwich: JAI Press.
- 20
- Cited by