Book contents
- Do the Humanities Create Knowledge?
- Do the Humanities Create Knowledge?
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Chapter 2 What Would the Community Think?
- Chapter 3 Canon and Consensus
- Chapter 4 Knowing What Matters
- Chapter 5 In Defense of How Things Seem
- Chapter 6 Reading What Lies Within
- Chapter 7 Humanities Victorious?
- Chapter 8 Of Interest
- Chapter 9 The Hoax and the Humanities
- Chapter 10 Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2023
Book contents
- Do the Humanities Create Knowledge?
- Do the Humanities Create Knowledge?
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Chapter 2 What Would the Community Think?
- Chapter 3 Canon and Consensus
- Chapter 4 Knowing What Matters
- Chapter 5 In Defense of How Things Seem
- Chapter 6 Reading What Lies Within
- Chapter 7 Humanities Victorious?
- Chapter 8 Of Interest
- Chapter 9 The Hoax and the Humanities
- Chapter 10 Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Do the Humanities Create Knowledge? , pp. 237 - 246Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Abd-Allah, Umar F. Mālik and Medina: Islamic Legal Reasoning in the Formative Period. Leiden: Brill, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Tabarani, Abu al-Qasim Sulayman. Al-Mu’jam al-Kabir. 11 volumes. Beirut: DKI, 2007.Google Scholar
Anstey, P. R. Experimental versus Speculative Natural Philosophy. In The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century, edited by Anstey, P. R. and Schuster, J. A.. 215–42. Netherlands: Springer, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baggott, J. E. The Quantum Story: A History in 40 Moments. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bain, Jonathan, and Norton, John D.. What Should Philosophers of Science Learn from the History of the Electron. In Histories of the Electron: The Birth of Microphysics. 451–65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bode, Adam, and Kushnick, Geoff. Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (April 12, 2021).Google ScholarPubMed
Boyd, Richard. Metaphor and Theory Change. In Metaphor and Thought, edited by Ortony, Andrew. 481–532. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Broad, William J., and Wade, Nicholas. Betrayers of the Truth. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983.Google Scholar
Brown, Harvey R. Physical Relativity: Space-Time Structure from a Dynamical Perspective. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Jonathan A. C. The Canonization of Al-Bukhari and Muslim. Boston: Brill, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, Stephen G. Choosing Selection: The Revival of Natural Selection in Anglo-American Evolutionary Biology, 1930–1970. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 2009.Google Scholar
Brush, Stephen G., and Segal, Ariel. Making 20th Century Science: How Theories Became Knowledge. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth. Imaginative Frames for Scientific Inquiry: Metaphors, Telling Facts, and Just-So Stories. In The Scientific Imagination, edited by Levy, Arnon and Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 304–36. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Caporael, Linnda R., Griesemer, James R., and Wimsatt, William C.. Developing Scaffolds in Evolution, Culture, and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Cavell, S. The Avoidance of Love: A Reading of King Lear. In Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays, edited by Cavell, S. (Cambridge Philosophy Classics). 246–325. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1969/2015.Google Scholar
Chemla, Karine. The Value of Generality in Michel Chasles’s Historiography of Geometry. In The Oxford Handbook of Generality in Mathematics and the Sciences, edited by Chemla, Karine, Chorlay, Renaud, and Rabouin, David. 47–89. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Clune, Michael W. A Defense of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. If You’re an Egalitarian, How Come You’re So Rich? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. Franklin and Newton; an Inquiry into Speculative Newtonian Experimental Science and Franklin’s Work in Electricity as an Example Thereof. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1956.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. The Newtonian Revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. The Birth of a New Physics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1985.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan. English Pasts: Essays in Culture and History. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Creager, Angela. Model Organisms. In Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions at Fifty, edited by Richards, Robert and Daston, Lorraine. 151–66. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst R. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. New York: Pantheon, 1953.Google Scholar
Damerow, Peter, Freudenthal, Gideon, McLaughlin, Peter, and Renn, Jürgen. Exploring the Limits of Preclassical Mechanics: A Study of Conceptual Development in Early Modern Science: Free Fall and Compounded Motion in the Work of Descartes, Galileo and Beeckman. New York: Springer, 1991.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids Are Fertilised by Insects, and on the Good Effects of Intercrossing. London: J. Murray, 1862.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: J. Murray, 1871.Google Scholar
Devitt, M. Intuitions in Linguistics. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57, no. 3 (2006): 481–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, Carol, and Kurke, Leslie. The Cultures within Ancient Greek Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eblen, Matthew K., Wagner, Robin M., Chowdhury, Deepshikha Roy, Katherine C. Patel, , and Pearson, Katrina. How Criterion Scores Predict the Overall Impact Score and Funding Outcomes for National Institutes of Health Peer-Reviewed Applications. PLoS ONE 11, no. 6 (July 1, 2016): e0155060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einstein, Albert, Hanoch, Gutfreund, and Jürgen, Renn. 2015. Relativity: the special & the general theory. 100th anniversary edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
El Shamsy, Ahmed. The Canonization of Islamic Law: A Social and Intellectual History. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, Eve-Marie, and Glick, Thomas F.. The Reception of Charles Darwin in Europe. London and New York: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar
Farkas, Katalin. 2018. Know-How and Non-Propositional Intentionality. In Non-Propositional Intentionality, edited by Alex Grzankowski and Michelle Montague, 95–113. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley Eugene. Is There a Text in This Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley Eugene. Opinion: Professor Sokal’s Bad Joke. New York Times. May 21, 1996.Google Scholar
Fleck, Ludwig. The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1935/1981.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. The Emergence of a Scientific Culture: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1210–1685. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. The Collapse of Mechanism and the Rise of Sensibility: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1680–1760. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. Civilization and the Culture of Science: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1795–1935. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayon, Jean. Darwinism’s Struggle for Survival. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Gettier, Edmund L. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis 23, no. 6 (1963): 121–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich, Owen. Circles of the Gods: Copernicus, Kepler, and the Ellipse. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 47, no. 4 (1994): 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, James. Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman. New York: Pantheon Books, 1992.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art; an Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968.Google Scholar
Goodstein, David L. In Defense of Robert Andrews Millikan. Engineering and Science 63, no. 4 (2000): 30–38.Google Scholar
Goodstein, David L. In Defense of Robert Andrews Millikan. American Scientist 89, no. 1 (2001): 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordin, Michael D. Scientific Babel: How Science Was Done before and after Global English. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabiner, Judith V. The Origins of Cauchy’s Rigorous Calculus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony, and Most, Glenn W.. How to Do Things with Texts: An Introduction. In Canonical Texts and Scholarly Practices: A Global Comparative Approach, edited by Grafton, Anthony and Most, Glenn W.. 1–13. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Jeremy. Plato’s Ghost: The Modernist Transformation of Mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieneisen, Michael L., and Zhang, Minghua. A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature. PLoS ONE 7, no. 10 (2012): e44118.Google Scholar
Grosholz, Emily. Representation and Productive Ambiguity in Mathematics and the Sciences. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Steven. Linguistic Intuitions: Error Signals and the Voice of Competence. In Linguistic Intuitions, edited by Schindler, Samuel, Drożdżowicz, Anna, and Brøcker, Karen. 13–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Steven, and Culbertson, Jennifer. Revisited Linguistic Intuitions. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62, no. 3 (2011): 639–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillory, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutting, Gary. What Philosophers Know: Case Studies in Recent Analytic Philosophy. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart. Logic and Appreciation. In Aesthetics and Language, edited by Eton, William. 161–69. New York: Oxford University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter. The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Peter. Experimental Religion and Experimental Science in Early Modern England. Intellectual History Review 21, no. 4 (2011): 413–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häussler, Jana, and Juzek, Tom. Linguistic Intuitions and the Puzzle of Gradience. Linguistic Intuitions: Evidence and Method (2020): 233–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbron, John L. Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries: A Study of Early Modern Physics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbron, John L. Natural Philosophy. In Wrestling with Nature, edited by Harrison, Peter, Numbers, Ronald, and Shank, Michael. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Heilbron, John L. Was There a Scientific Revolution. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Physics, edited by Buchwald, Jed Z.. 2–24. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Heilbron, John L., and Kuhn, Thomas S.. The Genesis of the Bohr Atom. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 1 (1969): vi–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/27757291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Mary B. Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Holmes, Frederic Lawrence. Investigative Pathways: Patterns and Stages in the Careers of Experimental Scientists. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Holton, Gerald. Subelectrons, Presuppositions, and the Millikan-Ehrenhaft Dispute. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 9 (1978): 161–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David L. Darwin and His Critics; the Reception of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution by the Scientific Community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. Darwin’s Science and Victorian Philosophy of Science. The Cambridge Companion to Darwin (2003): 168–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Michael. Establishing the New Science: The Experience of the Early Royal Society. Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Huss, John. The Shape of Evolution: The Mbl Model and Clade Shape. In The Paleobiological Revolution: Essays on the Growth of Modern Paleontology, edited by Sepkoski, David and Ruse, Michael. 327–45. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Isenberg, Arnold. Critical Communication. In Aesthetics and Language, edited by Elton, William. 131–46. Oxford.Google Scholar
Joy, Lynn S. Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Law of Nature. In The Cambridge History of Science, edited by Park, Katherine and Daston, Lorraine. 70–105. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafka, Alexander C. “Sokal Squared”: Is Huge Publishing Hoax “Hilarious and Delightful” or an Ugly Example of Dishonesty and Bad Faith? Chronicle of Higher Education Oct. 3, 2018.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. Darwin’s Achievement. In Reason and Rationality in Natural Science, edited by Rescher, N. 127–89. Lanham: University Press of America. Google Scholar, 1985.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. Two Forms of Blindness: On the Need for Both Cultures. Technology in Society 32, no. 1 (2010): 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. Philosophy Inside Out. Metaphilosophy 42, no. 3 (2011): 248–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr, Wilbur Richard. The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements: A Study of the Theory of Incommensurable Magnitudes and Its Significance for Early Greek Geometry. Dordrecht, Holland; Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, David. Darwin’s Keystone: The Principle of Divergence. In The Cambridge Companion to the Origin of Species, edited by Ruse, M. and Richards, R.. 1–25. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Copernican Revolution; Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science. Isis 52, no. 2 (1961): 161–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre, and Musgrave, Alan. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Vol. 4. Cambridge University Press, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, Michèle. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Marc. Aspects of Mathematical Explanation: Symmetry, Unity, and Salience. The Philosophical Review 123, no. 4 (2014): 485–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Marc. Explanation, Existence and Natural Properties in Mathematics: A Case Study: Desargues’ Theorem. Dialectica 69, no. 4 (2015): 435–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larivière, Vincent, Gingras, Yves, and Archambault, Éric. The Decline in the Concentration of Citations, 1900–2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, no. 4 (2008): 858–62. doi.org/10.1002/asi.21011Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry. Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry. The Medium and Its Message: A Study of Some Philosophical Controversies about Ether. In Conceptions of Ether: Studies in the History of Ether Theories, 1740–1900, edited by Cantor, George N. and Hodge, Michael J. S.. 157–85. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry. The Demise of the Demarcation Problem. In Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis, edited by Cohen, Robert S. and Laudan, Larry. 111–27. D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983.Google Scholar
Laudan, Rachel. Histories of the Sciences and Their Uses: A Review to 1913. History of Science 31, no. 91 (1993): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindner, Mark D., Vancea, Adrian, Chen, Mei-Ching, and Chacko, George. NIH Peer Review: Scored Review Criteria and Overall Impact. American Journal of Evaluation 37, no. 2 (2016): 238–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludlow, Peter. The Philosophy of Generative Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Lycan, William G. On Evidence in Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, Margaret. Some Distinctive Features of Arguments Used in Criticism of the Arts. In Aesthetics and Language, edited by Elton, William. Oxford: Blackwell, 1954.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Michael. The Mathematical Career of Pierre de Fermat, 1601–1665. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makdisi, George. The Rise of Humanism in Classical Islam and the Christian West. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchor, Ricardo N, de Valais, Silvina, and Genise, Jorge F. Bird-Like Fossil Footprints from the Late Triassic. Nature 417, no. 6892 (2002): 936–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melchor, Ricardo N., de Valais, Silvina, and Genise, Jorge F.. Retraction Note: Bird-like Fossil Footprints from the Late Triassic. Nature 501, no. 262 (2013): 262–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, George A., and Chomsky, Noam A.. Finitary Models of Language Users. In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Volume II, edited by Duncan Luce, R., Bush, Robert R., and Galanter, Eugene. 419–49. New York and London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1963.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. A. On the Elementary Electrical Charge and the Avogadro Constant. Physical Review 2, no. 2 (1913): 109–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molyneux, William. A Letter from the Learned and Ingenious Mr. Will. Molyneux Secretary to the Society of Dublin, to Will. Musgrave L. L. B. Fellow of New Colledge, and Secretary to the Philosophical Society of Oxford, for Advancement of Natural Knowledge; Concerning Lough Neagh in Ireland, and Its Petrifying Qualitys. Philosophical Transactions 14, no. 155–66 (1684a): 552–54.Google Scholar
Molyneux, William. An Ingenious Retractation of the 7th and Last Paragraph of Mr. William Molyneux’s Letter in the Philosophical Transact. Numb. 158. Pag. 554. Concerning Lough Neagh Stone and Its Non Application to the Magnet upon Calcination. Being an Abstract of a Letter of the Same Ingenious Gentleman Dated from Dublin Novemb. 25. 1684. Philosophical Transactions 14, no. 155–66 (1684b): 820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasim, Omar W. Observing by Hand: Sketching the Nebulae in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, Reviel. The Transformation of Mathematics in the Early Mediterranean World: From Problems to Equations. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, Reviel. Scale, Space, and Canon in Ancient Literary Culture. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, D. B., Cabiati, F., Fischer, J., Fujii, K., Karshenboim, S. G., Margolis, H. S., de Mirandés, E., et al. The CODATA 2017 Values Of h, e, k, and NA for the Revision of the SI. Metrologia 55, no. 1 (2018): L13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, William, and Principe, Lawrence. Alchemy Tried in the Fire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Bernard Cohen, I., and Miller Whitman, Anne. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Niaz, Mansoor. An Appraisal of the Controversial Nature of the Oil Drop Experiment: Is Closure Possible? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56, no. 4 (2005): 681–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Obokata, Haruko, Sasai, Yoshiki, Niwa, Hitoshi, Kadota, Mitsutaka, Andrabi, Munazah, Takata, Nozomu, et al. Retraction: Bidirectional Developmental Potential in Reprogrammed Cells with Acquired Pluripotency. Nature 511, no. 7507 (2014): 112.Google ScholarPubMed
Olenick, Richard P., Apostol, Tom M., and Goodstein, David L.. The Mechanical Universe: Introduction to Mechanics and Heat. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Olesko, Kathryn M. The Foundation of a Canon: Kohlrausch’s Practical Physics. In Pedagogy and the Practice of Science: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Kaiser, David. 323–56. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ording, Philip. 99 Variations on a Proof. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Orr, H. Allen. The Genetic Theory of Adaptation: A Brief History. Nature Reviews Genetics 6, no. 2 (2005): 119–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ospovat, Dov. The Development of Darwin’s Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Overbye, Dennis. A Tiny Particle’s Wobble Could Upend the Known Laws of Physics. New York Times, April 9, 2021.Google Scholar
Pennock, Robert T. An Instinct for Truth: Curiosity and the Moral Character of Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planck, Max. On the Theory of the Energy Distribution Law of the Normal Spectrum. Verhandl. Dtsch. phys. Ges., 2, 237.Google Scholar
Pluckrose, Helen, Lindsay, James, and Boghossian, Peter. Understanding the “Grievance Studies Affair” Papers and Why They Should Be Reinstated: A Response to Geoff Cole. Sociological Methods & Research 50, no. 4 (2021): 1916–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provine, William B. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60, no. 1 (1951): 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehbock, Philip F. The Philosophical Naturalists: Themes in Early Nineteenth-Century British Biology. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Reisch, George A. Aristotle in the Cold War: On the Origins of Thomas Kuhn’s the Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions at Fifty: Reflections on a Science Classic (2016): 12–30.Google Scholar
Reisch, George A. The Politics of Paradigms: Thomas S. Kuhn, James B. Bryant Conant, and the Cold War “Struggle for Men’s Minds”. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Renn, Jürgen. Classical Physics in Disarray. In The Genesis of General Relativity, edited by Renn, Jürgen, Janssen, Michel, and Schemmel, Matthias. 21–80. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, Georges. A Defense of the Voice of Competence. In Linguistic Intuitions, edited by Schindler, Samuel, Drożdżowicz, Anna, and Brøcker, Karen. 33–50. Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocke, Alan J. Chemical Atomism in the Nineteenth Century: From Dalton to Cannizzaro. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Rocke, Alan J. Image and Reality: Kekulé, Kopp, and the Scientific Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowling, Joanne K., Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. New York: Arthur A. Levine Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S. The Meaning of Fossils: Episodes in the History of Palaeontology. London and New York: Macdonald and Co.; American Elsevier, 1972.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. The Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1910–11. Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11: 108–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, David. Rereading the Fossil Record. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven. A Social History of Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven, Schaffer, Simon, and Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life: Including a Translation of Thomas Hobbes, Dialogus Physicus De Natura Aeris by Simon Schaffer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara J. Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England: A Study of the Relationships between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Sibley, Frank. Aesthetic Concepts. The Philosophical Review 68, no. 4 (1959): 421–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Matthew. Natural Kindness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66, no. 2 (2015): 375–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Helen. The Value of the Humanities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, George E. J.J. Thomson and the Electron: 1897–1899 an Introduction. The Chemical Educator 2, no. 6 (1997): 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorokowska, Agnieszka, Sorokowski, Piotr, and Hilpert, Peter. Preferred Interpersonal Distances: A Global Comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 48, no. 4 (2017): 577–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprouse, Jon. A User’s View of the Validity of Acceptability Judgments as Evidence for Syntactic Theories. In Linguistic Intuitions: Evidence and Method, edited by Samuel Schindler, Anna Drożdżowicz and Karen Brøcker. 215–32: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon, and Schütze, Carson T.. Grammar and the Use of Data. In The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, edited by Aarts, Bas, Bowie, Jill, and Popova, Gergana. 40–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. Intellectualism and the Objects of Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85, no. 3 (2012): 754–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. Grant, Casadevall, Arturo, and Fang, Ferris C.. Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? PLoS ONE 8, no. 7 (2013): e68397. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stichweh, Rudolf. The Sociology of Scientific Disciplines: On the Genesis and Stability of the Disciplinary Structure of Modern Science (Jul 26, 2007): 1–13.Google Scholar
Strevens, Michael. The Knowledge Machine: How Irrationality Created Modern Science. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation, 2020.Google Scholar
Tappenden, Jamie. Proof Style and Understanding in Mathematics I: Visualization, Unification and Axiom Choice. In Visualization, Explanation and Reasoning Styles in Mathematics, edited by Mancosu, Paulo, Frovin Jørgensen, Klaus, and Andur Pedersen, Stig. 147–214. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappenden, Jamie. Mathematical Concepts: Fruitfulness and Naturalness. The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (2008): 276–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Joseph John. LVII. On the Masses of the Ions in Gases at Low Pressures. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 48, no. 295 (1899): 547–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Gelder, Geert Jan. Classical Arabic Literature: A Library of Arabic Literature Anthology. New York: New York University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Wagner, Günter P. Homology, Genes, and Evolutionary Innovation. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Wallace, Bruce. Fifty Years of Genetic Load: An Odyssey. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardhaugh, Benjamin. Encounters with Euclid: How an Ancient Greek Geometry Text Shaped the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Weiss, Bernard G. The Spirit of Islamic Law. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Werner, Reinhard. The Focus on Bibliometrics Makes Papers Less Useful. Nature 517 (2015): 245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westfall, Richard S. Force in Newton’s Physics: The Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Macdonald and Co.; American Elsevier, 1971.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William. Entrenchment and Scaffolding: An Architecture for a Theory of Cultural Change. In Developing Scaffolds in Evolution, Culture, and Cognition, edited by Caporael, Linnda, Griesemer, James, and Wimsatt, William. 77–105. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar