Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:34:59.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Ceramic production in Los Tuxtlas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Philip J. Arnold III
Affiliation:
Skidmore College, New York
Get access

Summary

The previous chapter characterized the Tuxtlas potters as traditional producers operating on a seasonal basis. Minor variability in the production environment was noted (i.e. clays and temper), but other factors such as climate and subsistence activities did not vary markedly between production communities. Despite the separation of potters into two groups, based on time invested in production, pottery manufacture in Los Tuxtlas is essentially an unspecialized, part-time domestic chore.

This overall consistency in production scale and mode, however, is not mirrored by uniformity in manufacturing activities. In fact, the Tuxtlas potters display certain crucial differences in production tools and techniques. These technological distinctions are extremely relevant, for they constitute one of the primary vehicles for interpreting pottery manufacture in the past (also see Stark 1985). Differences in the number and kinds of tools are often associated with very different production systems (Peacock 1982:8–11; van der Leeuw 1984:Figure 1). Firing technology is a case in point; open-air firing is often associated with small-scale production while oven or kiln firing may be symptomatic of more intensive production industries (e.g. Foster 1955:10; Rice 1987:181–182; van der Leeuw 1976:392–398, 1977). Firing differences may also develop to mitigate climatic conditions (Arnold 1985:213). Kilns are of considerable archaeological importance, in that they are more likely to leave discernible archaeological traces than open or even pit firing (Stark 1985:165; also Deal 1988:124).

As the following discussion demonstrates both open and kiln firing are carried out by the Tuxtlas potters.

Type
Chapter
Information
Domestic Ceramic Production and Spatial Organization
A Mexican Case Study in Ethnoarchaeology
, pp. 35 - 60
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×