Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:56:43.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Philosophers as statesmen: in the light of recently discovered texts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Li Feng
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

The period from the birth of Confucius (551–479 BC) in the middle of the sixth century BC to the closing of the Warring States period in 221 BC is usually designated as the “Age of Philosophers.” Despite the ceaseless military conflicts staged by the large territorial states (analyzed in Chapter 9), China had at the same time also seen unprecedented intellectual developments with the Shi (discussed in Chapter 8) at the center of the stage. Those Shi who were able to systematically develop their theses, usually represented by a core group of texts, and in turn had them passed on to their disciples through the medium of private education were then remembered in history as the philosophers. The fundamental philosophical ideas developed by these late Spring and Autumn and Warring States period masters have since dominated the skyline of the Chinese intellectual life, and became the defining features of Chinese civilization over the next two millennia.

The phenomenon is interesting within the context of Chinese history and is also important for understanding the early development of the humanities in a global context. For this reason perhaps, the subject of early Chinese philosophy has always been at the heart of Western sinology. And this trend has only been increased with the discovery of critically important new philosophical texts from Warring States tombs, mainly in South China, over the past thirty years. It is obviously impossible to offer here a full discussion of the various propositions endorsed by the numerous philosophers and to trace the lines of their discourses across the extremely rich literature of the Warring States period, for which purpose good introductions have already been written. Instead, as a unit of a concise survey of early Chinese civilization the present chapter will focus on the process of formation of a few main philosophical traditions as a social and cultural phenomenon, along with the introduction of some fundamental concepts as their responses to the problems of their time and society. In this way, the chapter will also discuss some recent discoveries of philosophical texts and the significant new light they shed on the development of the early Chinese intellectual traditions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Early China
A Social and Cultural History
, pp. 206 - 227
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Feng, Yu-lan, A Short History of Chinese Philosophy, ed. Bodde, Derk (New York: The Free Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Graham, A. C., Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China (La Salle: Open Court, 1989).Google Scholar
Nivison, David Shepherd, “The Classical Philosophical Writing,” in Loewe, Michael and Shaughnessy, Edward L. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 745–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, Donald, “Warring States Natural Philosophy and Occult Thought,” in The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC, pp. 813–884.
Allan, Sarah, and Williams, Crispin (eds.), The Guodian Laozi: Proceedings of the International Conference, Dartmouth College, May 1998 (Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2000).
Yu-lan, Feng, A History of Chinese Philosophy, translated by Bodde, Derk (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952–3)Google Scholar
A Short History of Chinese Philosophy, edited by Bodde, Derk (New York: The Free Press, 1966)
Graham, A. C.; see Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China (La Salle: Open Court, 1989)Google Scholar
Nivison, David Shepherd, “Virtue in Bone and Bronze,” in Van Norden, Bryan W. (ed.), The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy (Chicago: Open Court, 1996), pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
Eno, Robert, The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and the Defense of Ritual Mastery (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990), p. 27.Google Scholar
Harper, Donald, “Warring States Natural Philosophy and Occult Thought,” in Loewe, Michael and Shaughnessy, Edward L. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 818, 865.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Karl, The Origin and Goal of History, translated by Bullock, Michael (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955), p. 18.Google Scholar
Eno, Robert, “The Background of the Kong Family of Lu and the Origins of Ruism,” Early China 28 (2003), 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, Annping, The Authentic Confucius: A Life of Thought and Politics (New York: Scribner, 2007), pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
Loewe, Michael, Early Chinese Texts: A Bibliographical Guide (Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, 1993), pp. 313–323.Google Scholar
Yu-lan, Feng, A History of Chinese Philosophy, translated by Bodde, Derk, 2 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952), p. 170.Google Scholar
Shaughnessy, Edward L., Rewriting Early Chinese Texts (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006), pp. 131–184.Google Scholar
Allan, Sarah and Williams, Crispin (eds.), The Guodian Laozi: Proceedings of the International Conference, Dartmouth College, May 1998 (Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, 2000) pp. 31, 107, 118–20.
Allan, Sarah, “The Great One, Water, and the Laozi: New Light from Guodian,” T’oung Pao 89.4–5 (2003), 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, Donald, “The Nature of Taiyi in the Guodian Manuscript Taiyi sheng shui: Abstract Cosmic Principle or Supreme Cosmic Deity?Chūgoku shutsudo shiryō kenkyū 5 (2001), 16.Google Scholar
Holloway, Kenneth W.; see Guodian: The Newly Discovered Seeds of Chinese Religious and Political Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 12–15, 102–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×