Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:54:37.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Developing expertise in human body perception

from Part II - The bodies of others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2011

Virginia Slaughter
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Celia A. Brownell
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

Adults see the human body shape in all manner of stimuli, including highly abstract stick figures that barely specify the human body configuration and point-light displays (PLDs) that specify only the characteristic motion patterns of the human form. This capacity to quickly and effortlessly perceive the human form reflects our expertise at visually processing human bodies. In this chapter we will argue that expertise in perceiving bodies occurs by virtue of their ubiquity and social significance, not because of any kind of innate representation or privileged learning mechanism. We are claiming this because visual discrimination of human bodies is slow to develop in infancy, and because it is initially stimulus-dependent, becoming more and more generalisable over time in a typical learning trajectory.

Body perception involves several processing steps. First, viewers detect that a visual object is a human body, as distinct from other object classes such as cars or dogs. At later stages of processing, viewers may identify features of an individual body, such as the posture, the gender or attractiveness, and they may also recognise the body’s personal identity. All of this information is ultimately interpreted for its social-communicative relevance and meaning in context. In this chapter, we will be focusing on the initial step of body processing: body detection, here defined as the capacity to visually discriminate bodies from other objects. We will describe a series of experiments in which we have investigated infants’ responses to typical human bodies versus scrambled bodies. The typical body stimuli portray the human form in various postures (e.g. arms raised above the head, legs spread wide, etc.). To create the scrambled body stimuli, we move the arms and/or legs to non-canonical locations (e.g. arms coming out of the head, legs and arms switched on the torso, etc.). We compare these two stimuli because scrambling bodies preserves the low level visual elements of typical bodies including total contour, contrast and visual detail, and distorts only the configural properties, that is, the unique overall shape by which viewers detect that a visual object is a human body as opposed to something else (see Figure 5.1 for examples). This technique has been used widely to investigate perception of faces (Johnson et al., 1991) as well as bodies (Peelen and Downing, 2005; Reed et al., 2006).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauchamp, M. S.Lee, K. E.Haxby, J. V.Martin, A. 2002 Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movementsNeuron 34 149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, M. S.Lee, K. E.Haxby, J. V.Martin, A. 2003 fMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objectsJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15 991CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentin, S.Allison, T.Puce, A.Perez, E.McCarthy, G. 1996 Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humansJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8 551CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bukach, C.Gauthier, I.Tarr, M. 2006 Beyond faces and modularity: The power of an expertise frameworkTrends in Cognitive Science 10 159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, S. 1992 Becoming a face expertPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 335 95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassia, V. M.Turati, C.Simion, F. 2004 Can a nonspecific bias toward top-heavy patterns explain newborns’ face preference?Psychological Science 15 379Google ScholarPubMed
Christie, T.Slaughter, V. 2009 Exploring links between sensori-motor and visuo-spatial body representations in infancyDevelopmental Neuropsychology 34 448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, T.Slaughter, V. 2011 Movement facilitates infants’ recognition of the whole human formCognition 114 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, T.Slaughter, V.Oka, T. 2009 Configural body processing in preschoolersPoster presented at the Experimental Psychology ConferenceWollongongAustraliaGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. B. 2004 Uses and misuses of habituation and related preference paradigmsInfant and Child Development 13 349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, P. E.Bray, D.Rogers, J.Childs, C. 2004 Bodies capture attention when nothing is expectedCognition 93 B27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downing, P. E.Jiang, Y.Shuman, M.Kanwisher, N. 2001 A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human bodyScience 293 2,470CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, I.Tarr, M. J. 1997 Becoming a ‘greeble’ expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognitionVision Research 37 1,673CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, I.Williams, P.Tarr, M. J.Tanaka, J. 1998 Training ‘greeble’ experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processesVision Research 38 2,401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gliga, T.Dehaene-Lambertz, G. 2005 Structural encoding of body and face in human infants and adultsJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 1,328CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, G.Sayfan, L.Lee, J.Sandhei, M.Walle-Olsen, A. 2007 The development of memory for own- and other-race facesJournal of Experimental Child Psychology 98 233CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartshorn, K.Rovee-Collier, C.Gerhardstein, P.Bhatt, R.Klein, P. 1998 Developmental changes in the specificity of memory over the first year of lifeDevelopmental Psychobiology 33 613.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayne, H.Boniface, J.Barr, R. 2000 The development of declarative memory in human infants: Age-related changes in deferred imitationBehavioral Neuroscience 114 77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heron, M.Slaughter, V. 2010 Infants’ responses to real humans and representations of humansInternational Journal of Behavioral Development 34 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, G. 1977 Studies on visual perception of locomotionPerception 6 365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. H.Dziurawiec, S.Ellis, H.Morton, J. 1991 Newborn preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent declineCognition 40 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. H.Morton, J. 1991 Biology and cognitive development: The case of face recognitionOxford, UKBlackwellGoogle Scholar
Le Grand, R.Mondloch, C. J.Maurer, D.Brent, H. P. 2003 Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancyNature Neuroscience 6 1,108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Grand, R.Mondloch, C. J.Maurer, D.Brent, H. P. 2004 Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivationPsychological Science 15 762CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mack, A.Rock, I. 1998 Inattentional BlindnessCambridge, MAMIT PressGoogle Scholar
Marshall, P.Shipley, T. 2009 Event-related potentials to point-light displays of human actions in 5-month-old infantsDevelopmental Neuropsychology 34 368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, D.Le Grand, R.Mondloch, C. J. 2002 The many faces of configural processingTrends in Cognitive Sciences 6 255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKone, E.Kanwisher, N.Duchaine, B. 2007 Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?Trends in Cognitive Science 11 8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minnebusch, D.Suchan, B.Daum, I. 2009 Losing your head: Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of body inversionJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21 865CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, C. A. 2001 The development and neural bases of face recognitionInfant and Child Development 10 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peelen, M. V.Downing, P. E. 2005 Within-subject reproducibility of category-specific visual activation with functional MRIHuman Brain Mapping 25 402CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramm, B.Cummins, T.Slaughter, V. 2010 Specifying the human body configurationVisual Cognition 18 898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, C. L.Stone, V.Bozova, S.Tanaka, J. 2003 The body inversion effectPsychological Science 14 302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, C. L.Stone, V.Grubb, J.McGoldrick, J. 2006 Turning configural processing upside down: Part and whole body posturesJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 67Google ScholarPubMed
Reid, V. M.Hoehl, S.Landt, J.Striano, T. 2008 Human infants dissociate structural and dynamic information in biological motion: Evidence from neural systemsSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 3 161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, G.Byatt, G.Michie, P. T.Puce, A. 2004 Is the fusiform face area specialized for faces, individuation, or expert individuation?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, R.McKone, E. 2007 No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasksCognition 103 34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sai, F. 2005 The role of the mother’s voice in developing mother’s face preference: Evidence for intermodal perception at birthInfant and Child Development 14 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzlose, R. F.Baker, C. I.Kanwisher, N. 2005 Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrusJournal of Neuroscience 25 11,055CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simion, F.Cassia, V.Turati, C.Valenza, E. 2001 The origins of face perception: Specific versus non-specific mechanismsInfant and Child Development 10 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simion, F.Regolin, L.Bulf, H. 2008 A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn babyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 105 809CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slaughter, V.Heron, M. 2004 Origins and early development of human body knowledgeMonographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slaughter, V.Heron, M.Sim, S. 2002 Development of preferences for the human body shape in infancyCognition 85 B71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stekelenburg, J.de Gelder, B. 2004 The neural correlates of perceiving human bodies: An ERP study on the body-inversion effectNeuroreport 15 777CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugita, Y. 2008 Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to facesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 105 394CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugita, Y. 2009 Innate face processingCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology 19 39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, J.Wiggett, A.Downing, P. 2007 fMRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areasJournal of Neurophysiology 98 1,626CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thierry, G.Pegna, A. J.Dodds, C.Roberts, M.Basan, S.Downing, P. 2006 An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human bodyNeuroimage 32 871CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornton, I.Pinto, J.Shiffrar, M. 1998 The visual perception of human locomotionCognitive Neuropsychology 15 535CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Y. 2005 Revisiting the role of the fusiform face area in visual expertiseCerebral Cortex 15 1,234CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×