Book contents
- Early Shakespeare, 1588–1594
- Early Shakespeare, 1588–1594
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction Beginning with Shakespeare
- Chapter 1 Shakespeare and the Idea of Early Authorship
- Chapter 2 Collaboration and Shakespeare’s Early Career
- Chapter 3 The Language and Style of Early Shakespeare
- Chapter 4 Shakespeare’s Early Verse Style
- Chapter 5 Early Shakespeare, Chaucer, and Narrative Theory:
- Chapter 6 Poetry, Counsel, and Coercion in Shakespeare’s Early History Plays
- Chapter 7 John Lyly and Shakespeare’s Early Career
- Chapter 8 Spenser and Shakespeare: Bards of a Feather?
- Chapter 9 Arden of Faversham, Richard Burbage, and the Early Shakespeare Canon
- Chapter 10 Boy Parts in Early Shakespeare
- Chapter 11 The Origins of Richard Duke of York
- Chapter 12 Early Shakespeare and the Authorship of The Taming of the Shrew
- Chapter 13 Who Read What When?
- Book part
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- References
Select Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 April 2020
Book contents
- Early Shakespeare, 1588–1594
- Early Shakespeare, 1588–1594
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction Beginning with Shakespeare
- Chapter 1 Shakespeare and the Idea of Early Authorship
- Chapter 2 Collaboration and Shakespeare’s Early Career
- Chapter 3 The Language and Style of Early Shakespeare
- Chapter 4 Shakespeare’s Early Verse Style
- Chapter 5 Early Shakespeare, Chaucer, and Narrative Theory:
- Chapter 6 Poetry, Counsel, and Coercion in Shakespeare’s Early History Plays
- Chapter 7 John Lyly and Shakespeare’s Early Career
- Chapter 8 Spenser and Shakespeare: Bards of a Feather?
- Chapter 9 Arden of Faversham, Richard Burbage, and the Early Shakespeare Canon
- Chapter 10 Boy Parts in Early Shakespeare
- Chapter 11 The Origins of Richard Duke of York
- Chapter 12 Early Shakespeare and the Authorship of The Taming of the Shrew
- Chapter 13 Who Read What When?
- Book part
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Early Shakespeare, 1588–1594 , pp. 315 - 320Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Primary Sources
Craig, Hugh and Kinney, Arthur F., eds. Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Eisen, Mark, Segarra, Santiago, Egan, Gabriel, and Ribeiro, Alejandro. ‘Stylometric Analysis of Early Modern Period English Plays’, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.05670.pdf.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W. The Editorial Problem in Shakespeare: A Survey of the Foundations of the Text (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1942, 1954).Google Scholar
Hart, Alfred. Stolne and Surreptitious Copies: A Comparative Study of Shakespeare’s Bad Quartos (Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1942).Google Scholar
Irace, Kathleen O. Reforming the ‘Bad’ Quartos: Performance and Provenance of Six Shakespearean First Editions (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Jackson, MacDonald P. ‘Determining Authorship: A New Technique’, Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 41 (2002), 1–14.Google Scholar
Jackson, MacDonald P. Determining the Shakespeare Canon: Arden of Faversham and ‘A Lover’s Complaint’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Jackson, MacDonald P. ‘Arden of Faversham and Shakespeare’s Early Collaborations: The Evidence of Meter’, Style 50:1 (2016), 65–79.Google Scholar
Kirwan, Peter. Shakespeare and the Idea of Apocrypha (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Knutson, Roslyn L. ‘What’s So Special about 1594?’ Shakespeare Quarterly 61:4 (2010), 449–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppel, Moshe, Schler, Jonathan, Argamon, Shlomo, and Winter, Yaron. ‘The “Fundamental Problem” of Authorship Attribution’, English Studies 93:3 (2012), 284–91.Google Scholar
Kreps, Barbara. ‘Bad Memories of Margaret? Memorial Reconstruction versus Revision in The First Part of the Contention and 2 Henry VI’, Shakespeare Quarterly 51 (2000), 154–80.Google Scholar
Loughnane, Rory. ‘Re-editing Non-Shakespeare for the Modern Reader’, Review of English Studies 68: 284 (2017), 268–95.Google Scholar
Maguire, Laurie. Shakespearean Suspect Texts: The ‘Bad’ Quartos and Their Contexts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Malone, Edmond. A Dissertation on the Three Parts of King Henry VI. Tending to Shew that those Plays were not Written Originally by Shakspeare (London: Henry Baldwin, 1787).Google Scholar
Martin, Randall. ‘The True Tragedy of Richard Duke of York: Report and Revision’, Review of English Studies 209 (2002), 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKerrow, R. B. ‘A Note on the “Bad Quartos” of 2 and 3 Henry VI and the Folio Text’, Review of English Studies 49 (1937), 64–72.Google Scholar
Nance, John V. ‘“We, John Cade”: Shakespeare, Marlowe, and the Authorship of 4.2.33–189, 2 Henry VI’, Shakespeare 13:1 (2017), 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prouty, Charles Tyler. ‘The Contention’ and ‘2 Henry VI’: A Comparative Study (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1954).Google Scholar
Segarra, Santiago, Eisen, Mark, Egan, Gabriel, and Ribeiro, Alejandro, ‘Attributing the Authorship of the Henry VI Plays by Word Adjacency’, Shakespeare Quarterly 67: 2 (2016), 232–56.Google Scholar
Syme, Holger Schott. ‘The Meaning of Success: Stories of 1594 and Its Aftermath’, Shakespeare Quarterly 61:4 (2010), 490–525.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary. ‘Shakespeare and Others: The Authorship of Henry the Sixth, Part One’, Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 7 (1995), 145–205.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary. ‘Why Did Shakespeare Collaborate?’, Shakespeare Survey 67 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 1–17.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary, and Nance, John V.. ‘Imitation or Collaboration? Marlowe and the Early Shakespeare Canon’, Shakespeare Survey 68 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Gary, and Egan, Gabriel, eds. The New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urkowitz, Steven. ‘“If I mistake in those foundations which I build upon”: Peter Alexander’s Textual Analysis of Henry VI Parts 2 and 3’, English Literary Renaissance 18 (1988), 230–56.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. ‘Incomplete Shakespeare: Or, Denying Co-authorship in Henry the Sixth, Part 1’, Shakespeare Quarterly 58:3 (2007), 311–52.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. ‘The Two Authors of Edward III’, Shakespeare Survey 67 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 102–18.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. ‘“Upstart Crow”? The Myth of Shakespeare’s Plagiarism’, Review of English Studies 68:284 (2017), 244–67.Google Scholar
Weber, William W.“‘Shakespeare After All?: The Authorship of Titus Andronicus 4.1 Reconsidered’, Shakespeare Survey 67 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 69–84.Google Scholar
Wells, Stanley and Edmondson, Paul, eds. Shakespeare Beyond Doubt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Wentersdorf, Karl P. ‘The Authenticity of The Taming of the Shrew’, Shakespeare Quarterly 5:1 (1954), 12–29.Google Scholar
Werstine, Paul. ‘Narratives about Printed Shakespeare Texts: “Foul Papers” and “Bad” Quartos’, Shakespeare Quarterly 41 (1990), 65–86.Google Scholar
Werstine, Paul. Early Modern Playhouse Manuscripts and the Editing of Shakespeare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Bate, Jonathan. Soul of the Age: The Life, Mind and World of William Shakespeare (London: Penguin / New York: Viking, 2008).Google Scholar
Chambers, E. K. William Shakespeare: A Study of Facts and Problems, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1930).Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Ungentle Shakespeare: Scenes from His Life (London: Thomson Learning, 2001).Google Scholar
Edmondson, Paul and Wells, Stanley. The Shakespeare Circle: An Alternative Biography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Honigmann, E. A. J. Shakespeare: The ‘Lost Years’, 2nd edn (1985; Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Mincoff, Marco. Shakespeare: The First Steps (Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1976).Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. Martin. The Shakespeare Circle. A Life of Dr. John Hall, Shakespeare’s Son-in-law, with Glimpses of Their Intimate Friends and Relations (Birmingham: Cornish Bros., 1947).Google Scholar
Mulryne, J. R., ed. Guild and Guild Buildings of Shakespeare’s Stratford: Society, Religion, School and Stage (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar
Nuttall, A. D. Shakespeare the Thinker (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Potter, Lois. The Life of William Shakespeare: A Critical Biography (Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).Google Scholar
Skura, Meredith Anne. Shakespeare the Actor and the Purposes of Playing (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Southworth, John. Shakespeare the Player: A Life in the Theatre (Stroud: Sutton Publishing, 2000).Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas and Smith, Geneviève. ‘A New Chronology for Shakespeare’s Plays’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 31:2 (2016), 301–20.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew. ‘Shakespeare’s First Poem: Sonnet 145’, Essays in Criticism 21 (1971), 221–6.Google Scholar
Jackson, MacDonald P. ‘Pause Patterns in Shakespeare’s Verse: Canon and Chronology’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 17 (2002), 37–46.Google Scholar
Malone, Edmond. ‘An Attempt to Ascertain the Order in which the Plays attributed to Shakespeare were written’, in The Plays of William Shakespeare, ed. Johnson, Samuel and Steevens, George, 10 vols. (London, 1778).Google Scholar
Mincoff, Marco. ‘The Chronology of Shakespeare’s Early Works’, Shakespeare Jahrbuch 100–1 (1964–5), 253–65.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary and Loughnane, Rory. ‘The Canon and Chronology of Shakespeare’s Works’ in Taylor, Gary and Egan, Gabriel, eds., The New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 417–602.Google Scholar
Wiggins, Martin, in association with Catherine Richardson, British Drama, 1533–1642: A Catalogue, 3 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W. William Shakspere’s Petty School (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1943).Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W. Shakspere’s Small Latine & Lesse Greeke, 2 vols. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1944).Google Scholar
Barton, Anne. ‘Shakespeare and the Limits of Language’, Shakespeare Survey 24 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarz, James P. Shakespeare & the Poets’ War (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Bluestone, Max and Rabkin, Norman, eds. Shakespeare’s Contemporaries (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice and Hall, 1970).Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas. ‘The Shakespearean Tetralogy’, Shakespeare Quarterly 36:3 (1985), 282–99.Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. Talbot. The Swan at the Well: Shakespeare Reading Chaucer (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Edwards, Philip, Ewbank, Inga-Stina, and Hunter, G. K., eds. Shakespeare’s Styles: Essays in Honour of Kenneth Muir (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Enterline, Lynn. Shakespeare’s Schoolroom: Rhetoric, Discipline, Emotion (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Greenfield, Sayre N. ‘Allegorical Impulses and Critical Ends: Shakespeare’s and Spenser’s Venus and Adonis’, Criticism 36:4 (1994), 475–498.Google Scholar
Hope, Jonathan. Shakespeare and Language: Reason, Eloquence and Artifice in the Renaissance (London: Methuen, 2010).Google Scholar
Hieatt, A. Kent. ‘The Genesis of Shakespeare’s Sonnets: Spenser’s Ruines of Rome: By Bellay’, Publications of the Modern Language Association 98:5 (1983), 800–14.Google Scholar
Houston, John Porter. Shakespearean Sentences: A Study in Style and Syntax (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Ingleby, C. M. ‘A Literary Craze: Shakspeare and Spenser’, Notes & Queries (1884) S6-X (249), 274.Google Scholar
Joseph, Sister Miriam. Shakespeare’s Use of the Arts of Language (New York: Columbia University Press, 1949).Google Scholar
King, Rosalind. ‘The Case for the Earlier Canon’ in Batchelor, John, Cain, Tom, and Lamont, Claire, eds., Shakespearean Continuities (Houndsmill: Macmillan, 1997), 108–22.Google Scholar
Kinney, Clare R. ‘Feigning Female Faining: Spenser, Lodge, Shakespeare, and Rosalind’, Modern Philology 95:3 (1998), 291–315.Google Scholar
Lethbridge, J. B., ed. Shakespeare and Spenser: Attractive Opposites (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Manley, Lawrence and Sally-Beth, MacLean. Lord Strange’s Men and Their Plays (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Martindale, Charles and Taylor, A. B., eds. Shakespeare and the Classics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
McInnis, David and Steggle, Matthew, eds. Lost Plays in Shakespeare’s England (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar
McMillin, Scott and Sally-Beth, MacLean. The Queen’s Men and the Their Plays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Melnikoff, Kirk and Gieskes, Edward, eds. Writing Robert Greene: Essays on England’s First Notorious Professional Writer (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
Moss, Daniel D. The Ovidian Vogue: Literary Fashion and Imitative Practice in Late Elizabethan England (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Nelson, Alan. ‘George Buc, William Shakespeare, and the Folger George a Greene’, Shakespeare Quarterly 49 (1998), 74–83.Google Scholar
Ostovich, Helen, Syme, Holger Schott, and Griffin, Andrew, eds. Locating the Queen’s Men, 1583–1603: Material Practices and Conditions of Playing (London: Ashgate, 2009).Google Scholar
Perry, Curtis and Watkins, John, eds. Shakespeare and the Middle Ages (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, Abbie Findlay. Shakespeare and The Faerie Queene (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Prescott, Anne Lake and Hieatt, A. Kent. ‘Shakespeare and Spenser’, PMLA 100:5 (1985), 820–2.Google Scholar
Schoone-Jongen, Terence G. Shakespeare’s Companies: William Shakespeare’s Early Career and the Acting Companies, 1577–1594 (Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
Thompson, Ann. Shakespeare’s Chaucer: A Study in Literary Origins (Liverpool: University of Liverpool Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Wells, Stanley. ‘The Failure of The Two Gentlemen of Verona’, Shakespeare Jahrbuch 99 (1963), 161–73.Google Scholar