Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T19:28:18.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Conservation Strategies and Habitat Management for European Forest Birds

from Part III - Conservation and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2018

By
Robert J. Fuller  and
Hugo Robles
Edited by
Grzegorz Mikusiński ,
Jean-Michel Roberge  and
Robert J. Fuller
Grzegorz Mikusiński
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Jean-Michel Roberge
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Robert J. Fuller
Affiliation:
British Trust for Ornithology, Norfolk
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Ecology and Conservation of Forest Birds , pp. 455 - 507
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aben, J., Adriaensen, F., Thijs, K.W. et al. (2012) Effects of matrix composition and configuration on forest bird movements in a fragmented Afromontane biodiversity hotspot. Animal Conservation, 15, 658–668.Google Scholar
Åberg, J., Jansson, G., Swenson, J.E. & Angelstam, P. (1995) The effect of matrix on the occurrence of hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in isolated habitat fragments. Oecologia, 103, 265–269.Google Scholar
Ahlering, M.A. & Faaborg, J. (2006) Avian habitat management meets conspecific attraction: If you build it, will they come? Auk, 123, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, K., Stickler, D. & Green, T. (2010) Is the practice of haloing successful in promoting extended life? A preliminary investigation of the response of veteran oak and beech trees to increased light levels in Windsor Forest. Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 104, 257–266.Google Scholar
Anders, A.D., Faaborg, J. & Thompson, F.R. III (1998) Postfledging dispersal, habitat use, and home-range size of juvenile wood thrushes. Auk, 115, 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, J., Domingo Gómez, E., Michon, S. & Roberge, J.-M. (2017) Tree cavity densities and characteristics in managed and unmanaged Swedish boreal forest. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2017.1360389.Google Scholar
Archaux, F. & Bakkaus, N. (2007) Relative impact of stand structure, tree composition and climate on mountain bird communities. Forest Ecology and Management, 247, 72–79.Google Scholar
Artman, V.L., Sutherland, E.K. & Downhower, J.F. (2001) Prescribed burning to restore mixed-oak communities in Southern Ohio: Effects on breeding-bird populations. Conservation Biology, 15, 1423–1434.Google Scholar
Askins, R.A. (2001) Sustaining biological diversity in early successional communities: The challenge of managing unpopular habitats. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29, 407–412.Google Scholar
Baglione, V., Canestrari, D., Marcos, J.M. & Ekman, J. (2006) Experimentally increased food resources in the natal territory promotes offspring philopatry and helping in cooperatively breeding carrion crows. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 273, 1529–1535.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. (2007) Increased connectivity in fragmented landscapes: An investigation of evidence for biodiversity gain in woodlands. Forest Ecology and Management, 238, 7–23.Google Scholar
Baines, D. & Summers, R.W. (1997) Assessment of bird collisions with deer fences in Scottish forests. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 941–948.Google Scholar
Batáry, P., Fischer, J., Báldi, A., Crist, T.O. & Tscharntke, T. (2011) Does habitat heterogeneity increase farmland biodiversity? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 152–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, E.M. & Hobson, K.A. (2001) Effects of habitat fragmentation on pairing success of Ovenbirds: The importance of male age and floater behavior. Auk, 118, 380–388.Google Scholar
Begehold, H., Rzanny, M. & Flade, M. (2015) Forest development phases as an integrating tool to describe habitat preferences of breeding birds in lowland beech forests. Journal of Ornithology, 156, 19–29.Google Scholar
Bennett, A.F. (1999) Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Betts, M.G., Fahrig, L., Hadley, A.S. et al. (2014) A species-centered approach for uncovering generalities in organism responses to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecography, 37, 517–527.Google Scholar
Bibby, C.J., Aston, N. & Bellamy, P.E. (1989) Effects of broadleaved trees on birds of upland conifer plantations in North Wales. Biological Conservation, 49, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blicharska, M., Baxter, P.W.J. & Mikusiński, G. (2014) Practical implementation of species’ recovery plans: Lessons from the White-backed Woodpecker action plan in Sweden. Ornis Fennica, 91, 108–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blicharska, M. & Mikusiński, G. (2014) Incorporating social and cultural significance of large old trees in conservation policy. Conservation Biology, 28, 1558–1567.Google Scholar
Bollmann, K. & Braunisch, V. (2013) To integrate or to segregate: Balancing commodity production and biodiversity conservation in European forests. In Integrative Approaches as an Opportunity for the Conservation of Forest Biodiversity. Kraus, D. & Krumm, F. (eds.). Barcelona: European Forest Institute, pp. 18–31.Google Scholar
Bowler, D.E. & Benton, T.G. (2005) Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: Relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biological Reviews, 80, 205–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridgeland, W.T., Beier, P., Kolb, T. & Whitham, T.G. (2010) A conditional trophic cascade: Birds benefit faster growing trees with strong links between predators and plants. Ecology, 91, 73–84.Google Scholar
Broome, A., Connolly, T. & Quine, C.P. (2014) An evaluation of thinning to improve habitat for capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus). Forest Ecology and Management, 314, 94–103.Google Scholar
Brown, J.H. & Kodric-Brown, A. (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: Effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology, 58, 445–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, D.M. & Nol, E. (1998) Influence of food abundance, nest-site habitat, and forest fragmentation on breeding Ovenbirds. Auk, 115, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahall, R.E. & Hayes, J.P. (2009) Influences of postfire salvage logging on forest birds in the Eastern Cascades, Oregon, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 1119–1128.Google Scholar
Calladine, J., Bielinski, A. & Shaw, G. (2013) Effects on bird abundance and species richness of edge restructuring to include shrubs at the interface between conifer plantations and moorland. Bird Study, 60, 345–356.Google Scholar
Calladine, J., Bray, J., Broome, A. & Fuller, R.J. (2015) Comparison of breeding bird assemblages in conifer plantations managed by continuous cover forestry and clearfelling. Forest Ecology and Management, 344, 20–29.Google Scholar
Camprodón, J., Campión, D., Martínez-Vidal, R. et al. (2007) Habitat selection and conservation of the Iberian woodpeckers. In Conservación de la Biodiversidad, Fauna Vertebrada y Gestión Forestal. Camprodón, J. & Plana, E. (eds.). Barcelona: Centro Tecnológico Forestal de Cataluña–University of Barcelona, pp. 391–434. [in Spanish]Google Scholar
Cevasco, R. & Moreno, D. (2015) Historical ecology in modern conservation in Italy. In Europe’s Changing Woods and Forests: From Wildwood to Managed Landscapes. Kirby, K.J. & Watkins, C. (eds.). Wallingford, UK: CABI, pp. 227–242.Google Scholar
Chalfoun, A.D., Thompson, F.R. & Ratnaswamy, M.J. (2002) Nest predators and fragmentation: A review and meta-analysis. Conservation Biology, 16, 306–318.Google Scholar
Ciudad, C., Robles, H. & Matthysen, E. (2009) Postfledging habitat selection of juvenile middle spotted woodpeckers: A multi-scale approach. Ecography, 32, 676–682.Google Scholar
Clobert, J., Le Galliard, J.-F., Cote, J., Meylan, S. & Massot, M. (2009) Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Ecology Letters, 12, 197–209.Google Scholar
Cockle, K.L., Martin, K. & Wesołowski, T. (2011) Woodpeckers, decay, and the future of cavity-nesting vertebrate communities worldwide. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 377–382.Google Scholar
Cooper, C.B. & Walters, J.R. (2002) Experimental evidence of disrupted dispersal causing decline of an Australian passerine in fragmented habitat. Conservation Biology, 16, 471–478.Google Scholar
Costello, C.A., Yamasaki, M., Pekins, P.J., Leak, W.B. & Neefus, C.D. (2000) Songbird response to group selection harvests and clearcuts in a New Hampshire northern hardwood forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 127, 41–54.Google Scholar
Currie, D. & Matthysen, E. (1998) Nuthatches do not delay postfledging dispersal in isolated forest fragments. Belgian Journal of Zoology, 128, 49–54.Google Scholar
Currie, F.A. & Bamford, R. (1982) The value to bird life of retaining small conifer stands beyond normal felling age within forests. Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 76, 153–160.Google Scholar
DeGraaf, R.M. & Yamasaki, M. (2003) Options for managing early-successional forest and shrubland bird habitats in the northeastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management, 185, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, J.L. & McGowan, A. (2005) Winter resource wealth drives delayed dispersal and family-group living in western bluebirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 272, 2423–2428.Google ScholarPubMed
Dickson, J.G., Conner, R.N. & Williamson, J.H. (1983) Snag retention increases bird use of a clear-cut. Journal of Wildlife Management, 47, 799–804.Google Scholar
Dolman, P.M., Hinsley, S.A., Bellamy, P.E. & Watts, K. (2007) Woodland birds in patchy landscapes: The evidence base for strategic networks. Ibis, 149 (Suppl. 2), 146–160.Google Scholar
du Bus de Warnaffe, G. & Deconchat, M. (2008) Impact of four silvicultural systems on birds in the Belgian Ardenne: Implications for biodiversity in plantation forests. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 1041–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edenius, L. (2011) Short-term effects of wildfire on bird assemblages in old pine- and spruce-dominated forests in northern Sweden. Ornis Fennica, 88, 71–79.Google Scholar
Elmhagen, B., Ludwig, G., Rushton, S.P., Helle, P. & Lindén, H. (2010) Top predators, mesopredators and their prey: Interference ecosystems along bioclimatic productivity gradients. Journal of Animal Ecology, 79, 785–794.Google Scholar
Erdelen, M. (1984) Bird communities and vegetation structure: I. Correlations and comparisons of simple and diversity indices. Oecologia, 61, 277–284.Google Scholar
Fahrig, L. (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 487–515.Google Scholar
Fedrowitz, K., Koricheva, J., Baker, S.C. et al. (2014) Can retention forestry help conserve biodiversity? A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 1669–1679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrer, M., Newton, I. & Muriel, R. (2013) Rescue of a small declining population of Spanish imperial eagles. Biological Conservation, 159, 32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, C. & Frochot, B. (1990) Bird communities of the forests of Burgundy and the Jura (Eastern France). In Biogeography and Ecology of Forest Bird Communities. Keast, A. (ed.). The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing, pp. 183–195.Google Scholar
Fischer, J., Hartel, T. & Kuemmerle, T. (2012) Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes. Conservation Letters, 5, 167–175.Google Scholar
Fischer, J., Lindenmayer, D.B. & Manning, A.D. (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: Ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4, 80–86.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R.J. (2007) Species interactions and population density mediate the use of social cues for habitat selection. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 598–606.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R.J. (2009) Does conspecific attraction explain the patch-size effect? An experimental test. Oikos, 118, 1139–1147.Google Scholar
Foster, C.N., Barton, P.S. & Lindenmayer, D.B. (2014) Effects of large native herbivores on other animals. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 929–938.Google Scholar
Fuller, R.J. (1992) Effects of coppice management on woodland breeding birds. In The Ecology and Management of Coppice Woodlands. Buckley, G.P. (ed.). London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 169–192.Google Scholar
Fuller, R.J. (2012a) Avian responses to transitional habitats in temperate cultural landscapes: Woodland edges and young-growth. In Birds and Habitat: Relationships in Changing Landscapes. Fuller, R.J. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 125–149.Google Scholar
Fuller, R.J. (2012b) Habitat quality and habitat occupancy by birds in variable environments. In Birds and Habitat: Relationships in Changing Landscapes. Fuller, R.J. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–62.Google Scholar
Fuller, R.J. (2013) Searching for biodiversity gains through woodfuel and forest management. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 1295–1300.Google Scholar
Fuller, R.J., Smith, K.W. & Hinsley, S.A. (2012) Temperate western European woodland as a dynamic environment for birds: A resource-based view. In Birds and Habitat: Relationships in Changing Landscapes. Fuller, R.J. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 352–380.Google Scholar
Fuller, R.J., Smith, K.W., Grice, P.V., Currie, F.A. & Quine, C.P. (2007) Habitat change and woodland birds in Britain: Implications for management and future research. Ibis, 149 (Suppl. 2), 261–268.Google Scholar
Gilbert-Norton, L., Wilson, R., Stevens, J.R. & Beard, K.H. (2010) A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conservation Biology, 25, 660–668.Google Scholar
Gill, R.M.A. & Fuller, R.J. (2007) The effects of deer browsing on woodland structure and songbirds in lowland Britain. Ibis, 149 (Suppl. 2), 119–127.Google Scholar
Gimona, A., Poggio, L., Brown, I. & Castellazzi, M. (2012) Woodland networks in a changing climate: Threats from land use change. Biological Conservation, 149, 93–102.Google Scholar
Goodale, E., Beauchamp, G., Magrath, R.D., Nieh, J.C. & Ruxton, G.D. (2010) Interspecific information transfer influences animal community structure. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25, 354–361.Google Scholar
Götmark, F. (2002) Predation by sparrowhaws favours early breeding and small broods in great tits. Oecologia, 130, 25–32.Google Scholar
Gram, W.K., Porneluzi, P.A., Clawson, R.L., Faaborg, J. & Richter, S.C. (2003) Effects of experimental forest management on density and nesting success of bird species in Missouri Ozark forests. Conservation Biology, 17, 1324–1337.Google Scholar
Green, R.E., Cornell, S.J., Scharlemann, J.P.W. & Balmford, A. (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science, 307, 550–555.Google Scholar
Griesser, M. & Lagerberg, S. (2012) Long-term effects of forest management on territory occupancy and breeding success of an open-nesting boreal bird species, the Siberian jay. Forest Ecology and Management, 271, 58–64.Google Scholar
Groom, M.J., Meffe, G.K. & Carroll, C.R. (2006) Principles of Conservation Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Haddad, N.M. & Tewksbury, J.J. (2006) Impacts of corridors on populations and communities. In Connectivity Conservation. Crooks, K.R. & Sanjayan, M. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 390–415.Google Scholar
Halkka, A. & Lappalainen, I. (2001) Insight into Europe’s Forest Protection. Gland, Switzerland: WWF.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M.E. (1997) Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harmer, R., Kerr, G. & Thompson, R. (2010) Managing Native Broadleaved Woodland. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Hartel, T., Dorresteijn, I., Klein, C. et al. (2013) Wood-pastures in a traditional rural region of Eastern Europe: Characteristics, management and status. Biological Conservation, 166, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartel, T., Hanspach, J., Abson, D.J., Máthé, O., Moga, C.I. & Fischer, J. (2014) Bird communities in traditional wood-pastures with changing management in eastern Europe. Basic and Applied Ecology, 15, 385–395.Google Scholar
Hinsley, S.A., Fuller, R.J. & Ferns, P.N. (2015) The changing fortunes of woodland birds in temperate Europe. In Europe’s Changing Woods and Forests: From Wildwood to Managed Landscapes. Kirby, K.J. & Watkins, C. (eds.). Wallingford, UK: CABI, pp. 154–173.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J.A., Thomas, C.D., Wintle, B.A. & Moilanen, A. (2009) Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: Back to basics. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 964–969.Google Scholar
Holmes, S.B. & Pitt, D.G. (2007) Response of bird communities to selection harvesting in a northern tolerant hardwood forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 238, 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, C.A., Fuller, R.J. & Dolman, P.M. (2013a) Exclusion of deer affects responses of birds to woodland regeneration in winter and summer. Ibis, 156, 116–131.Google Scholar
Holt, C.A., Fuller, R.J. & Dolman, P.M. (2013b) Deer reduce habitat quality for a woodland songbird: Evidence from settlement patterns, demographic parameters, and body condition. Auk, 130, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, F.C., Hess, C.A., Klicklighter, B.C. & Thum, R.A. (2001) Ecosystem management and the niche gestalt of the Red-cockaded woodpecker in longleaf pine forests. Ecological Applications, 11, 854–870.Google Scholar
Jansson, G. & Angelstam, P. (1999) Threshold levels of habitat composition for the presence of the long-tailed tit (Aegitalus caudatus) in a boreal landscape. Landscape Ecology, 14, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jentsch, S., Mannan, R.W., Dickson, B.G. & Block, W.M. (2008) Associations among breeding birds and gambel oak in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Journal of Wildlife Management, 72, 994-1000.Google Scholar
Johnsson, K., Nilsson, S.G. & Tjernberg, M. (1993) Characteristics and utilization of old Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius holes by hole-nesting species. Ibis, 135, 410–416.Google Scholar
Kirby, K.J. & Watkins, C. (2015) The forest landscape before farming. In Europe’s Changing Woods and Forests: From Wildwood to Managed Landscapes. Kirby, K.J. & Watkins, C. (eds.). Wallingford, UK: CABI, pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
Klein, A.M., Boreux, V., Bauhus, J., Jahi-Chappell, M., Fisher, J. & Philpott, S.M. (2014) Forest islands in an agricultural sea. In Global Forest Fragmentation. Kettle, C.J. & Koh, L.P. (eds.). Wallingford, UK: CABI, pp. 79–95.Google Scholar
Koch Widerberg, M., Ranius, T., Drobyshev, I., Nilsson, U. & Lindbladh, M. (2012) Increased openness around retained oaks increases species richness of saproxylic beetles. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 3035–3059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, W., Van Vuren, D. & Hooge, P.N. (1996) Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 514–517.Google Scholar
Kokko, H. & Sutherland, W.J. (1998) Optimal floating and queuing strategies: Consequences for density dependence and habitat loss. American Naturalist, 152, 354–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korpimäki, E. (1987) Clutch size, breeding success and brood size experiments in the Tengmalm´s owl Aeolius funereus: A test of hypotheses. Ornis Scandinavica, 18, 277–284.Google Scholar
Kosiński, Z., Bilińska, E., Dereziński, J., Jeleń, J. & Kempa, M. (2010) The Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius and the European Beech Fagus sylvatica as keystone species for the Stock Dove Columba oenas in western Poland. Ornis Polonica, 51, 1–13.Google Scholar
Lampila, P., Mönkkönen, M. & Desrochers, A. (2005) Demographic responses by birds to forest fragmentation. Conservation Biology, 19, 1537–1546.Google Scholar
Langston, R.H.W., Wotton, S.R., Conway, G.J. et al. (2007) Nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus and Woodlark Lullula arborea – recovering species in Britain? Ibis, 149, 250–260.Google Scholar
Lens, L., Van Dongen, S., Norris, K., Githiru, M. & Matthysen, E. (2002) Avian persistence in fragmented rainforest. Science, 298, 1236–1238.Google Scholar
Linden, D.W., Roloff, G.J. & Kroll, A.J. (2012) Conserving avian richness through structure retention in managed forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 284, 174–184.Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D.B. & Fischer, J. (2006) Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change: An Ecological and Conservation Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D.B. & Fischer, J. (2007) Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 127–132.Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D.B., Franklin, J.F. & Fischer, J. (2006) General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 131, 433–445.Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D.B., Franklin, J.F., Lõhmus, A. et al. (2012) A major shift to the retention approach in forestry can help resolve global forest sustainability issues. Conservation Letters, 5, 421–431.Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D., Hobbs, R.J., Montague-Drake, R. et al. (2008) A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecology Letters, 11, 78–91.Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D.B., Laurance, W.F., Franklin, J.F. et al. (2014) New policies for old trees: averting a global crisis in a keystone ecological structure. Conservation Letters, 7, 61–69.Google Scholar
Lõhmus, A. (2005) Are timber harvesting and conservation of nest sites of forest-dwelling raptors always mutually exclusive? Animal Conservation, 8, 443–450.Google Scholar
Lõhmus, A. (2006) Nest-tree and nest-stand characteristics of forest dwelling raptors in east-central Estonia: Implications for forest management and conservation. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences: Biology, Ecology, 55, 31–50.Google Scholar
Loman, J. (2006) Does nest site availability limit the density of hole nesting birds in small woodland patches? Web Ecology, 6, 37–43.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R.H. & MacArthur, J.W. (1961) On bird species diversity. Ecology, 42, 594–598.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. (1967) The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J.M.D. (1951) Control of forest populations. Quarterly Journal of Forestry, (April), 1–8.Google Scholar
Marquis, R.J. & Whelan, C.J. (1994) Insectivorous birds increase growth of white oak through consumption of leaf-chewing insects. Ecology, 75, 2007–2014.Google Scholar
Martin, J.-L., Drapeau, P., Fahrig, L. et al. (2012) Birds in cultural landscapes: Actual and perceived differences between northeastern North America and western Europe. In Birds and Habitat: Relationships in Changing Landscapes. Fuller, R.J. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 481–515.Google Scholar
Matthysen, E. (1999) Nuthatches (Sitta europaea: Aves) in forest fragments: Demography of a patchy population. Oecologia, 119, 501–509.Google Scholar
Matthysen, E. (2005) Density-dependent dispersal in birds and mammals. Ecography, 28, 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthysen, E. & Adriaensen, F. (1998) Forest size and isolation have no effect on reproductive success of Eurasian Nuthatches (Sitta europaea). Auk, 115, 955–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthysen, E. & Currie, D. (1996) Habitat fragmentation reduces disperser success in juvenile nuthatches Sitta europaea: Evidence from patterns of territory establishment. Ecography, 19, 67–72.Google Scholar
McDermott, M.E. & Wood, P.B. (2011) Post-breeding bird responses to canopy tree retention, stand size, and edge in regenerating Appalachian hardwood stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 547–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShea, W.J. & Rappole, J.H. (2000) Managing the abundance and diversity of breeding bird populations through manipulation of deer populations. Conservation Biology, 14, 1161–1170.Google Scholar
Mikusiński, G. (1995) Population trends in black woodpecker in relation to changes and characteristics of European forests. Ecography, 18, 363–369Google Scholar
Mills, G.S., Dunning, J.B. & Bates, J.M. (1991) The relationship between breeding bird density and vegetation volume. Wilson Bulletin, 103, 468–479.Google Scholar
Mitrus, C. (2003) A comparison of the breeding ecology of collared flycatchers nesting in boxes and natural cavities. Journal of Field Ornithology, 74, 293–299.Google Scholar
Møller, A.P. (1989) Parasites, predators and nest boxes: Facts and artefacts in nest box studies of birds? Oikos, 56, 421–423.Google Scholar
Møller, A.P., Adriaensen, F., Artemyev, A. et al. (2014) Clutch size variation in Western Palearctic secondary hole-nesting birds in relation to nest box design. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 353–362.Google Scholar
Mönkkönen, M., Helle, P. & Soppela, K. (1990) Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.): Heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communities? Oecologia, 85, 218–225.Google Scholar
Moorman, C.E. & Guynn, D.C. (2001) Effects of group-selection opening size on breeding bird habitat use in a bottomland forest. Ecological Applications, 11, 1680–1691.Google Scholar
Morrison, E.B. & Lindell, C.A. (2012) Birds and bats reduce insect biomass and leaf damage in tropical forest restoration sites. Ecological Applications, 22, 1526–1534.Google Scholar
Nilsson, K., Sangster, M., Gallis, C. et al. (eds.) (2011) Forests, Trees and Human Health. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Nilsson, S.G. (1979) Density and species richness of some forest bird communities in South Sweden. Oikos, 33, 392–401.Google Scholar
Nilsson, S.G. (1987) Limitation and regulation of population density in the Nuthatch Sitta europaea (Aves) breeding in natural cavities. Journal of Animal Ecology, 56, 921–937.Google Scholar
Noss, R.F. & Daly, K.M. (2006) Incorporating connectivity into broad-scale conservation planning. In Connectivity Conservation. Crooks, K.R. & Sanjayan, M. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 587–619.Google Scholar
Olsson, O., Wiktander, U., Malmqvist, A. & Nilsson, S.G. (2001) Variability of patch type preferences in relation to resource availability and breeding success in a bird. Oecologia, 127, 435–443.Google Scholar
Otto, C.R.V. & Roloff, G.J. (2012) Songbird response to green-tree retention prescriptions in clearcut forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 284, 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palang, H., Printsmann, A., Gyuro, E.K., Urbanc, M., Skowronek, E. & Woloszyn, W. (2006) The forgotten rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe. Landscape Ecology, 21, 347–357.Google Scholar
Palomo, I., Montes, C., Martín-López, B. et al. (2014) Incorporating the social-ecological approach in protected areas in the Anthropocene. BioScience, 64, 181–191.Google Scholar
Parviainen, J. (2005) Virgin and natural forests in the temperate zone of Europe. Forest Snow and Landscape Research, 79, 9–18.Google Scholar
Parviainen, J., Bücking, W., Vandekerkhove, K., Schuck, A. & Päivinen, R. (2000) Strict forest reserves in Europe: Efforts to enhance biodiversity and research on forests left for free development in Europe (EU-COST-Action E4). Forestry, 73, 107–118.Google Scholar
Parviainen, J. & Schuck, A. (2011) Maintenance, conservation and appropriate enhancement of biological diversity in forest ecosystems. In: State of Europe’s Forests 2011: Status and Trends in Sustainable Forest Management in Europe. Oslo: FOREST EUROPE, UNECE and FAO, pp. 65–97.Google Scholar
Penteriani, V., Ferrer, M. & Delgado, M.M. (2011) Floater strategies and dynamics in birds, and their importance in conservation biology: Towards an understanding of nonbreeders in avian populations. Animal Conservation, 14, 233–241.Google Scholar
Penteriani, V., Otalora, F. & Ferrer, M. (2008) Floater mortality within settlement areas can explain the Allee effect in breeding populations. Ecological Modelling, 213, 98–104.Google Scholar
Peterken, G.F. (1993) Woodland Conservation and Management (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Petit, D.R., Petit, K.E., Grubb, T.C. & Reichhardt, L.J. (1985) Habitat and snag selection by woodpeckers in a clear-cut: An analysis using artificial snags. Wilson Bulletin, 97, 525–533.Google Scholar
Pietzarka, U. & Roloff, A. (1993). Forest edge management in consideration of natural vegetation dynamics. Forstarchiv, 64, 107–113.Google Scholar
Porneluzi, P.A., Brito-Aguilar, R., Clawson, R.L. & Faaborg, J. (2014) Long-term dynamics of bird use of clearcuts in post-fledging period. Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 126, 623–832.Google Scholar
Porneluzi, P.A. & Faaborg, J. (1999) Season-long fecundity, survival, and viability of ovenbirds in fragmented and unfragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology, 13, 1151–1161.Google Scholar
Poulsen, B.O. (2002) Avian richness and abundance in temperate Danish forests: Tree variables important to birds and their conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 1551–1566.Google Scholar
Pöysä, H. & Pöysä, S. (2002) Nest-site limitation and density dependence of reproductive output in the common goldeneye Bucephala clangula: Implications for the management of cavity-nesting birds. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 502–510.Google Scholar
Quine, C.P., Fuller, R.J., Smith, K.W. & Grice, P.V. (2007) Stand management: A threat or opportunity for birds in British woodland? Ibis (Suppl. 2), 149, 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remm, J., Lõhmus, A. & Remm, K. (2006) Tree cavities in riverine forests: What determines their occurrence and use by hole-nesting passerines? Forest Ecology and Management, 221, 267–277.Google Scholar
Revilla, E., Wiegand, T., Palomares, F., Ferreras, P. & Delibes, M. (2004) Effects of matrix heterogeneity on animal dispersal: From individual behavior to metapopulation-level parameters. American Naturalist, 164, E130–E153.Google Scholar
Richard, Y. & Armstrong, D.P. (2010) Cost distance modelling of landscape connectivity and gap-crossing ability using radio-tracking data. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 603–610.Google Scholar
Roberge, J.-M., Laudon, H., Björkman, C. et al. (2016) Socio-ecological implications of modifying rotation lengths in forestry. Ambio, 45, 109–123.Google Scholar
Robles, H. & Ciudad, C. (2012) Influence of habitat quality, population size, patch size, and connectivity on patch-occupancy dynamics of the middle spotted woodpecker. Conservation Biology, 26, 284–293.Google Scholar
Robles, H. & Ciudad, C. (2017) Floaters may buffer the extinction risk of small populations: An empirical assessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 284, 20170074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robles, H., Ciudad, C. & Matthysen, E. (2011) Tree-cavity occurrence, cavity occupation and reproductive performance of secondary cavity-nesting birds in oak forests: The role of traditional management practices. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 1428–1435.Google Scholar
Robles, H., Ciudad, C. & Matthysen, E. (2012) Responses to experimental reduction and increase of cavities by a secondary cavity-nesting bird community in cavity-rich Pyrenean oak forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 277, 46–53.Google Scholar
Robles, H., Ciudad, C., Vera, R. & Baglione, V. (2007b) No effect of habitat fragmentation on post-fledging, first-year and adult survival in the middle spotted woodpecker. Ecography, 30, 685–694.Google Scholar
Robles, H., Ciudad, C., Vera, R., Olea, P.P. & Matthysen, E. (2008) Demographic responses of middle spotted woodpeckers (Dendrocopos medius) to habitat fragmentation. Auk, 125, 131–139.Google Scholar
Robles, H., Ciudad, C., Vera, R., Olea, P.P., Purroy, F.J. & Matthysen, E. (2007a) Sylvopastoral management and conservation of the middle spotted woodpecker at the south-western edge of its distribution range. Forest Ecology and Management, 242, 343–352.Google Scholar
Robles, H. & Martin, K. (2013) Resource abundance and quality determine the inter-specific associations between ecosystem engineers and resource users in a cavity-nest web. PLoS ONE, 8 (9), e74694.Google Scholar
Robles, H. & Martin, K. (2014) Habitat-mediated variation in the importance of ecosystem engineers for secondary cavity nesters in a nest web. PLoS ONE, 9 (2), e90071.Google Scholar
Robles, H. & Olea, P.P. (2003) Distribution and abundance of Middle Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos medius in a southern population of the Cantabrian Mountains. Ardeola, 50, 275–280.Google Scholar
Robles, H. & Pasinelli, G. (2014) Woodpeckers as model organisms in a changing world – Foreword to the 7th International Woodpecker Conference Proceedings. Acta Ornithologica, 49, 203–206.Google Scholar
Root, R.B. (1973) Organization of a plant–arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: The fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecological Monographs, 43, 95–124.Google Scholar
Rosenvald, R. & Lõhmus, A. (2008) For what, when and where is green-tree retention better than clear-cutting? A review of the biodiversity aspects. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 1–15.Google Scholar
Rost, J., Hutto, R.L., Brotons, L. & Pons, P. (2013) Comparing the effect of salvage logging on birds in the Mediterranean Basin and the Rocky Mountains: Common patterns, different conservation implications. Biological Conservation, 158, 7-13.Google Scholar
Sandom, C.J., Ejrnæs, R., Hansen, M.D.D. & Svenning, J.-C. (2014) High herbivore density associated with vegetation diversity in interglacial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 4162–4167.Google Scholar
Schütz, J.-P. (1999) Close-to-nature silviculture: Is this concept compatible with species diversity? Forestry, 72, 359–366.Google Scholar
Seymour, R.S. & Hunter, M.L. (1999) Principles of ecological forestry. In Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. Hunter, M.L. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–61.Google Scholar
Söderström, B. (2009) Effects of different levels of green- and dead-tree retention on hemi-boreal forest bird communities in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 215–222.Google Scholar
Smith, K.W. (2007) The utilization of dead wood resources by woodpeckers in Britain. Ibis, 149 (Suppl. 2), 183–192.Google Scholar
Smith, K.W. & Smith, L. (2013) The effect of supplementary feeding in early spring on the breeding performance of the great spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos major. Bird Study, 60, 169–175.Google Scholar
Sunde, P. (2005) Predators control post-fledging survival in tawny owls, Strix aluco. Oikos, 110, 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, T.L. & Hannon, S.J. (2010) Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss: A review of the concepts, evidence, and applications. Biological Reviews, 85, 35–53.Google Scholar
Thompson, F.R. & Burhans, D.E. (2004) Differences in predators of artificial and real songbird nests: Evidence of bias in artificial nest studies. Conservation Biology, 18, 373–380.Google Scholar
Thompson, F.R. & DeGraaf, R.M. (2001) Conservation approaches for woody, early successional communities in the eastern United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29, 483–494.Google Scholar
Vega Rivera, J.H., Rappole, J.H., McShea, W.J. & Haas, C.A. (1998) Wood thrush postfledging movements and habitat use in northern Virginia. Condor, 100, 69–78.Google Scholar
Vera, F.W.M. (2000) Grazing Ecology and Forest History. Wallingford, UK: CABI.Google Scholar
Verner, J. & Larson, T.A. (1989) Richness of breeding bird species in mixed-conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada, California. Auk, 106, 447–463.Google Scholar
Verschuyl, J., Riffell, S., Miller, D. & Wigley, T.B. (2011) Biodiversity response to intensive biomass production from forest thinning in North American forests – A meta-analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 221–232.Google Scholar
Villard, M.-A., Martin, P.R. & Drummond, C.G. (1993) Habitat fragmentation and pairing success in the Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapillus). Auk, 110, 759–768.Google Scholar
Ward, M.C. & Schlossberg, S. (2004) Conspecific attraction and the conservation of territorial birds. Conservation Biology, 18, 519–525.Google Scholar
Warren, M.S. & Fuller, R.J. (1993) Woodland Rides and Glades: Their Management for Wildlife (2nd ed.). Peterborough, UK: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.Google Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (2002) Antipredator adaptations in nesting Marsh Tits Parus palustris: The role of nest site security. Ibis, 144, 593–601.Google Scholar
Wesołowski, T. (2005) Virtual conservation: How the European Union is turning a blind eye to its vanishing primeval forests. Conservation Biology, 19, 1349–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesołowski, T. & Fuller, R.J. (2012) Spatial variation and temporal shifts in habitat use by birds at the European scale. In Birds and Habitat: Relationships in Changing Landscapes. Fuller, R.J. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–92.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.W., Gittings, T., Kelly, T.C. & O’Halloran, J. (2010) The importance of non-crop vegetation for bird diversity in Sitka spruce plantations in Ireland. Bird Study, 57, 116–120.Google Scholar
Zahner, V., Sikora, L. & Pasinelli, G. (2012) Heart rot as a key factor for cavity tree selection in the black woodpecker. Forest Ecology and Management, 271, 98–103.Google Scholar
Zanette, L., Doyle, P. & Trémont, S.M. (2000) Food shortage in small fragments: evidence from an area-sensitive passerine. Ecology, 81, 1654–1666.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×