Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-16T05:47:01.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2025

Michael Mandler
Michael Mandler
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Economics without Preferences
Microeconomics and Policymaking Beyond the Maximizing Individual
 , pp. 231 - 240
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdalla, M. and Al-Shawarby, S., 2018. “The Tamween food subsidy system in Egypt: evolution and recent implementation reforms,” in The 1.5 Billion People Question: Food, Vouchers, or Cash Transfers? eds. Alderman, H., Gentilini, U., and Yemtsov, R.. Washington, DC: Bank, World.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainslie, G., 1992. Picoeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alchian, A., 1950. “Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory.” Journal of Political Economy 58: 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderman, H., 1986. “Food subsidies and state policy in Egypt,” in Food, States, and Peasants: Analyses of the Agrarian Question in the Middle East, ed. Richards, A.. Boulder, CO: Press, Westview.Google Scholar
Allen, R., 1936. “Professor Slutsky’s theory of consumers’ choice.” Review of Economic Studies 3: 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, F. and Aumann, R., 1963. “A definition of subjective probability.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34: 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, W., 1948. “Uncertainty and the utility function.” Economic Journal 58: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, W., 1950. “A note on the theory of consumer’s behaviour.” Oxford Economic Papers (New Series) 2: 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K., 1951a. “An extension of the basic theorems of classical welfare economics,” in Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, ed. Neyman, J.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, K., 1951b. Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
Arrow, K., 1952. “Le principe de rationalité dans les décisions collectives.” Économie Appliquée 5: 469–484, translated as “The principle of rationality in collective decisions” in Social Choice and Justice, Arrow, K., Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Arrow, K., 1964. “The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk-bearing.” Review of Economic Studies 31: 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K., 1977. “Current developments in the theory of social choice.” Social Research 44: 607–622.Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, C. and Gevers, L., 1977. “Equity and the informational basis of collective choice.” Review of Economic Studies 44: 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R., 1962. “Utility theory without the completeness axiom.” Econometrica 30: 445–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R., 1964. “Utility theory without the completeness axiom: a correction.” Econometrica 32: 210–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. and Peleg, B., 1974. “A note on Gale’s example.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 1: 209–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. and Bowen, W., 1965. “On the performing arts: the anatomy of their economic problems.” American Economic Review 55: 495–502.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. and Bowen, W., 1966. Performing Arts, The Economic Dilemma: A Study of Problems Common to Theater, Opera, Music, and Dance. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G., 1962. “Irrational behavior and economic theory.” Journal of Political Economy 70: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G., 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G., 1991. “A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influences on price.” Journal of Political Economy 99: 1109–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B. D. and Rangel, A., 2007. “Toward choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics.” American Economic Review 97: 464–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B. D. and Rangel, A., 2009. “Beyond revealed preference: choice theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124: 51–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernoulli, D., 1738. “Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk.” Translated in Econometrica 22: 23–36, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, T., 1986. “Knightian decision theory. Part I.” Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 807, Yale University. Also in Decisions in Economics and Finance 25: 79–110, 2002.Google Scholar
Blume, L. and Easley, D., 1992. “Evolution and market behavior.” Journal of Economic Theory 58: 9–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossert, W. and Weymark, J., 2004. “Utility in social choice,” in Handbook of Utility Theory, Vol. 2: Extensions, eds. Barberà, S., Hammond, P., and Seidl, C.. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Caballero, R. and Hammour, M., 1994. “The cleansing effect of recessions.” American Economic Review 84: 1350–1368.Google Scholar
Carson, R., 1997. “Contingent valuation and tests of insensitivity to scope,” in Determining the Value of Non-marketed Goods: Economic, Psychological and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods, eds. Kopp, R., Pommerhene, W., and Schwartz, N.. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Carson, R., 2012. “Contingent valuation: a practical alternative when prices aren’t available.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, R. and Hanemann, W., 2005. “Contingent valuation,” in Handbook of Environmental Economics, Volume 2, eds. Mäler, K.-G. and Vincent, J.. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Dillenberger, D., and Ortoleva, P., 2015. “Cautious expected utility and the certainty effect.” Econometrica 83: 693–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cettolin, E., and Riedl, A., 2019. “Revealed preferences under uncertainty: incomplete preferences and preferences for randomization.” Journal of Economic Theory 181: 547–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakraborty, A., 2021. “Present bias.” Econometrica 89: 1921–1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R., 2014. “Uncertain equilibria and incomplete preferences.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 55: 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipman, J. and Moore, J., 1980. “Compensating variation, consumer’s surplus, and welfare.” American Economic Review 70: 933–949.Google Scholar
Conlisk, J., 1988. “Optimization cost.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 9: 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa-Gomes, M., Cueva, C., Gerasimou, G., and Tejišcák, M., 2022. “Choice, deferral, and consistency.” Quantitative Economics 13: 1297–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cubitt, R. and Sugden, R., 2001. “On money pumps.” Games and Economic Behavior 37: 121–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, R., Brookshire, D., and Schulze, W. (eds.), 1986. Valuing Environmental Goods. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Cunha, A. and Swinbank, A., 2011. An Inside View of the CAP Reform Process: Explaining the MacSharry, Agenda 2000, and Fischler Reforms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D., McKinsey, J., and Suppes, P., 1955. “Outlines of a formal theory of value, I.” Philosophy of Science 22: 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, G., 1951. “The coefficient of resource utilization.” Econometrica 19: 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, G., 1954. “Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function,” in Decision Processes, eds. Thrall, R., Coombs, C., and Davis, R.. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Debreu, G., 1970. “Economies with a finite set of equilibria.” Econometrica 38: 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, G., 1972. “Smooth preferences.” Econometrica 40: 603–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P. and Mirrlees, J., 1971. “Optimal taxation and public production. I. Production efficiency.” American Economic Review 61: 8–27.Google Scholar
Dierker, E., Dierker, H., and Trockel, W., 1984. “Price-dispersed preferences and C1 mean demand.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 13: 11–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. and Norman, V., 1980. Theory of International Trade: A Dual, General Equilibrium Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, M. and Isherwood, B., 1979. The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Drèze, J., 1974. “Investment under private ownership: optimality, equilibrium and stability,” in Allocation under Uncertainty: Equilibrium and Optimality, ed. Drèze, J.. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duesenberry, J., 1949. Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E., 1893. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Dworczak, P., Kominers, S., and Akbarpour, M., 2021. “Redistribution through markets.” Econometrica 89: 1665–1698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, F., 1897. “The pure theory of taxation,” in Papers Relating to Political Economy, vol. 2. London: Macmillan, 1925.Google Scholar
Eliaz, K. and Ok, E., 2006. “Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences.” Games and Economic Behavior 56: 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P., 1970a. “Intransitive indifference in preference theory: a survey.” Operations Research 18: 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P., 1970b. Utility Theory for Decision Making. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P., 1991. “Nontransitive preferences in decision theory.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4: 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. and LaValle, I., 1988. “Context-dependent choice with nonlinear and nontransitive preferences.” Econometrica 56: 1221–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B., Luechinger, S., and Stutzer, A., 2004. “Valuing public goods: the life satisfaction approach,” CESifo Working Paper Series 1158, CESifo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M., 1953. “The methodology of positive economics,” in Essays in Positive Economics, Friedman, M., pp. 3–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gerasimou, G., 2013. “On continuity of incomplete preferences.” Social Choice and Welfare 41: 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilboa, I., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., and Schmeidler, D., 2010. “Objective and subjective rationality in a multiple prior model.” Econometrica 78: 755–770.Google Scholar
Gilboa, I. and Schmeidler, D., 1989. “Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 18: 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grether, D. and Plott, C., 1979. “Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon.” American Economic Review 69: 623–638.Google Scholar
Grossman, S. and Hart, O., 1979. “A theory of competitive equilibrium in stock market economies.” Econometrica 47: 293–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guesnerie, R., 1975. “Pareto optimality in non-convex economies.” Econometrica 43: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, F., 1961. “Theory of value: an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. Gerard Debreu.” Journal of Political Economy 69: 204–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammack, J. and Brown, G., 1974. Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bioeconomic Analysis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, P., 1981. “Ex-ante and ex-post welfare optimality under uncertainty.” Economica 48: 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J., 1955. “Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility.” Journal of Political Economy 63: 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, J., ed., 1993. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F., 1931. Prices and Production. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hicks, J., 1939a. Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J., 1939b. “The foundations of welfare economics.” Economic Journal 49: 696–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J., 1940. “The valuation of social income.” Economica 7 (n.s.): 104–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J., 1956. A Revision of Demand Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. and Allen, R., 1934. “A reconsideration of the theory of value.” Economica 1 (n.s.): 52–76, 196–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildenbrand, W., 1980. “On the uniqueness of mean demand for dispersed families of preferences.” Econometrica 48: 1703–1710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwicz, L., 1979. “On the interaction between information and incentives in organizations,” in Communication and Control in Society, ed. Krippendorff, K.. New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Jevons, W., 1871. The Theory of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., 2020. “Prospect theory.” Invited address to Decision: Theory, Experiments, Applications. Paris.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J., 1992. “Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22: 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., and Thaler, R., 1986. “Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: entitlements in the market.” American Economic Review 76: 728–741.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., and Thaler, R., 1990. “Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem.” Journal of Political Economy 98: 1325–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., 1979. “Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk.” Econometrica 47: 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., 1984. “Choices, values and frames.” American Psychologist 39: 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P., and Sarin, R., 1997. “Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N., 1939. “Welfare propositions in economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility.” Economic Journal 49: 549–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karni, E. and Levin, D., 1994. “Social attributes and strategic equilibrium: a restaurant pricing game.” Journal of Political Economy 102: 822–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M. and Vohra, R., 1987. “An extension of the second welfare theorem to economies with nonconvexities and public goods.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knetsch, J., 1989. “The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves.” American Economic Review 79: 1277–1284.Google Scholar
Knetsch, J. and Sinden, J., 1984. “Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of values.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99: 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knetsch, J. and Sinden, J., 1987. “The persistence of evaluation disparities.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 691–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, D., 1988. Notes on the Theory of Choice. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Köbberling, V. and Wakker, P., 2005. “An index of loss aversion.” Journal of Economic Theory 122: 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kőszegi, B. and Rabin, M., 2006. “A model of reference-dependent preferences.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121: 1133–1165.Google Scholar
Laibson, D., 1997. “Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 443–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, K., 1966. “A new approach to consumer theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74: 132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, E. and Teper, R., 2014. “Extension rules or what would the sage do?” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 6: 5–22.Google Scholar
Leontief, W., 1951. The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1939: An Empirical Application of Equilibrium Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, I., 1980. The Enterprise of Knowledge. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Levi, I., 1986. Hard Choices: Decision Making under Unresolved Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P., 1971. “Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P., 1973. “Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: an extended replication in Las Vegas.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 101: 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindman, H., 1971. “Inconsistent preferences among gambles.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 390–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. D., 1956. “Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination.” Econometrica 24: 178–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H., 1957. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mandler, M., 1995. “Sequential indeterminacy in production economies.” Journal of Economic Theory 66: 406–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, M., 1998. “The economics of incomplete preferences.” Cambridge, MA. Harvard University. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Mandler, M., 1999a. Dilemmas in Economic Theory: Persisting Foundational Problems of Microeconomics. New York: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, M., 1999b. “Simple Pareto-improving policies.” Journal of Economic Theory 84: 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, M., 2004. “Status quo maintenance reconsidered: changing or incomplete preferences?” Economic Journal 114: 518–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, M., 2005. “Incomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice.” Games and Economic Behavior 50: 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, M., 2007. “Policy discrimination with and without interpersonal comparisons of utility.” Economic Theory 32: 523–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, M., 2009. “Indifference and incompleteness distinguished by rational trade.” Games and Economic Behavior 67: 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, M., 2013. “Endogenous indeterminacy and volatility of asset prices under ambiguity.” Theoretical Economics 8: 729–750.Google Scholar
Mandler, M., 2014a. “Indecisiveness in behavioral welfare economics.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 97: 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, M., 2014b. “Irrationality-proofness: markets versus games.” International Economic Review 55: 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, M., 2020. “Distributive justice for behavioural welfare economics.” Economic Journal 130: 1140–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, M., 2021. “A unified explanation of reference dependence, loss aversion, and the reflection effect.” London: Royal Holloway College, University of London. Mimeo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, M., 2023. “Decision-making for extreme outcomes.” London: Royal Holloway College, University of London. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Marshall, A., 1890. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mas-Colell, A., 1983. “The Cournotian foundations of Walrasian equilibrium theory: an exposition of recent theory,” in Advances in Economic Theory (Econometric Society Monograph), ed. Hildenbrand, W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mas-Colell, A., 1985. The Theory of General Economic Equilibrium: A Differentiable Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masatlioglu, Y. and Ok, E., 2005. “Rational choice with status quo bias.” Journal of Economic Theory 121: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maskin, E. and Tirole, J., 1999. “Limited unforeseen contingencies and incomplete contracts.” Review of Economic Studies 66: 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D., 1973. Economic Maturity and Entrepreneurial Decline: British Iron and Steel, 1870–1913. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McKenzie, L., 1957. “Demand theory without a utility index.” Review of Economic Studies 24: 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S., 1861. “Utilitarianism,” reprinted in Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. 10, ed. Robson, J.. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P., 1984. “Physics and the ‘marginalist revolution.’” Cambridge Journal of Economics 8: 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirrlees, J., 1971. “An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation.” Review of Economic Studies 38: 175–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, W., 1991. “Smooth indifference sets.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 20: 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. and Winter, S., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., 1947. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, T. and Rabin, M., 1999. “Doing it now or later.” American Economic Review 89: 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, R., 1991. “Hedonic methods,” in Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality, eds. Braden, J. and Kolstad, C.. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Parsons, G., 2003. “The travel cost model,” in A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, eds. Champ, P., Boyle, K., and Brown, T.. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Pascoa, M. and Werlang, S., 1999. “Determinacy of equilibrium in nonsmooth economies.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 32: 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A., 1932. The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Postlewaite, A., 1979. “Manipulation via endowments.” Review of Economic Studies 46: 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radner, R., 1968. “Competitive equilibrium under uncertainty.” Econometrica 36: 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radner, R., 1972. “Existence of equilibrium of plans, prices, and price expectations in a sequence of markets.” Econometrica 40: 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J., 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Richter, M., 1966. “Revealed preference theory.” Econometrica 34: 635–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, L. and Shannon, C., 2005. “Uncertainty and risk in financial markets.” Econometrica 73: 203–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigotti, L. and Shannon, C., 2012. “Sharing risk and ambiguity.” Journal of Economic Theory 147: 2028–2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K., 1980. “Interpersonal comparability and social choice theory.” Review of Economic Studies 47: 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. H., 1951. “Utility and all that.” The Manchester School 19: 111–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockafellar, R. T., 1970. Convex Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roederer-Rynning, C., 2014. “The Common Agricultural Policy: the fortress challenged,” in Policy-Making in the European Union, 7th ed., eds. Wallace, H., Pollack, M., and Young, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P., 1938. “A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour.” Economica 5 (n.s.): 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P., 1939. “The gains from international trade.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 5: 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P., 1950. “Evaluation of real national income.” Oxford Economic Papers 2: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P., 1954. “The pure theory of public expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 36: 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P., 1956. “Social indifference curves.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P., 1974. “Complementarity: an essay on the 40th anniversary of the Hicks-Allen revolution in demand theory.” Journal of Economic Literature 12: 1255–1289.Google Scholar
Samuelson, W. and Zeckhauser, R., 1988. “Status quo bias in decision making.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 7–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, L., 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schlee, E., 2021. “Inertia implies disorder: kinks, incompleteness, and intransitivity.” Pure and Applied Functional Analysis 6: 851–855.Google Scholar
Schlee, E. and Khan, M., 2022. “Money metrics in applied welfare analysis: a saddlepoint rehabilitation.” International Economic Review 63: 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmeidler, D., 1971. “A condition for the completeness of partial preference relations.” Econometrica 39: 403–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmeidler, D., 1989. “Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity.” Econometrica 57: 571–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J., 1912. The Theory of Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J., 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J., 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Scitovsky, T., 1941. “A note on welfare propositions in economics.” Review of Economic Studies 9: 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A., 1970. “Interpersonal aggregation and partial comparability.” Econometrica 38: 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A., 1973. “Behaviour and the concept of preference.” Economica 40 (n.s.): 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A., 1979. “Utilitarianism and welfarism.” Journal of Philosophy 76: 463–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A., 1986. Welfare Economics and the Real World. Memphis, TN: Seidman Foundation.Google Scholar
Simon, H., 1978. “Rationality as process and as product of thought.” American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 68: 1–16.Google Scholar
Simon, H., 1979. “Rational decision making in business organizations.” American Economic Review 69: 493–513.Google Scholar
Slovic, P. and Lichtenstein, S., 1968. “The relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk-taking.” Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement 78: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P. and Lichtenstein, S., 1983. “Preference reversal: a broader perspective.” American Economic Review 73: 596–605.Google Scholar
Slutsky, E., 1915. “Sulla teoria del bilancio del consumatore.” Giornale degli Economisti 51: 1–26.Google Scholar
Sondermann, D., 1975. “Smoothing demand by aggregation.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 2: 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, R., 2003. “Reference-dependent subjective expected utility.” Journal of Economic Theory 111: 172–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L., 2003. “The hedonic method,” in A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, eds. Champ, P., Boyle, K., and Brown, T.. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Temin, P., 1966. “The relative decline of the British steel industry, 1880–1913,” in Industrialization in Two Systems: Essays in Honor of Alexander Gerschenkron, ed. Rosovsky, H.. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thaler, R., 1980. “Toward a positive theory of consumer choice.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C., 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., 1972. “Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice.” Psychological Review 79: 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., 1991. “Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 1039–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., 1992. “Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., Sattath, S., and Slovic, P., 1988. “Contingent weighting in judgment and choice.” Psychological Review 95: 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., Slovic, P., and Kahneman, D., 1990. “The causes of preference reversal.” American Economic Review 80: 204–217.Google Scholar
Walras, L., 1874. Elements of Pure Economics. London: Allen & Unwin, 1954.Google Scholar
Walley, P., 1991. Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S., 1971. “Satisficing, selection, and the innovating remnant.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 85: 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Michael Mandler, Royal Holloway, University of London
  • Book: Economics without Preferences
  • Online publication: 02 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009340731.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Michael Mandler, Royal Holloway, University of London
  • Book: Economics without Preferences
  • Online publication: 02 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009340731.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Michael Mandler, Royal Holloway, University of London
  • Book: Economics without Preferences
  • Online publication: 02 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009340731.015
Available formats
×