Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:43:05.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

Guido Bacciagaluppi  and
Elise Crull
Guido Bacciagaluppi
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Elise Crull
Affiliation:
City College, City University of New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Einstein Paradox
The Debate on Nonlocality and Incompleteness in 1935
 , pp. 352 - 364
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aharonov, Y. and Vaidman, L. (2007). The Two-State Vector Formalism of Quantum Mechanics: An Updated Review. arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105101v2.Google Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G. (1999). Nelsonian Mechanics Revisited. Foundations of Physics Letters 12 (1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G. (2008). The Statistical Interpretation According to Born and Heisenberg. In: HQ-1: Conference on the History of Quantum Physics, Vol. 2. Ed. by Joas, C., Lehner, C. and Renn, J.. Berlin: MPIWG, 269–288.Google Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G. (2013). Insolubility Theorems and EPR Argument. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G. (2014). Insolubility from No-Signalling. International Journal of Theo- retical Physics 53, 3465–3474.Google Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G. (2015). Did Bohr Understand EPR? In: One Hundred Years of the Bohr Atom. Ed. by Aaserud, F. and Kragh, H.. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, 375–394.Google Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G. (2016a). An Everett Perspective on Bohr and EPR. In: Niels Bohr in the 21st Century. Ed. by Faye, J. and Folse, H. J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 289–302.Google Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G. (2016b). Einstein, Bohm, and Leggett–Garg. In: Contextuality from Quantum Physics to Psychology. Ed. by Dzhafarov, E., Jordan, S. and Zhang, R.. Singapore: World Scientific, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G. (2017). Bohr's Slit and Hermann's Microscope. In: Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. by Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 135–147.Google Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G. (2022). The Statistical Interpretation: Born, Heisenberg and von Neumann, 1926–27. In: Oxford Handbook of the History of Quantum Interpretations. Ed. by Freire, O. et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 567–585.Google Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G. and Crull, E. (2009). Heisenberg (and Schrödinger, and Pauli) on Hidden Variables. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (4), 374–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G., Crull, E. and Maroney, O. J. E. (2017). Jordan's Derivation of Blackbody Fluctuations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 60, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G. and Valentini, A. (2009). Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsid- ering the 1927 Solvay Conference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassi, A. and Ghirardi, GC. (2000). A General Argument against the Universal Validity of the Superposition Principle. Physics Letters A 275, 373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. S. (1966). On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 38, 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beller, M. (1997). Against the Stream: Schrödinger's Interpretation of Quantum Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (3), 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belousek, D. W. (1996). Einstein's 1927 Unpublished Hidden-Variable Theory: Its Back- ground, Context and Significance. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (4), 437–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitbol, M. (1996). Schrödinger's Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, D. (1951). Quantum Theory. Hoboken: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bohm, D. (1952). A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables. I and II. Physical Review 85 (2), 166–179, 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, N. (1928a). Das Quantenpostulat und die neuere Entwicklung der Atomistik. Die Naturwissenschaften 16, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, N. (1928b). The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory. Nature 121, 580–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, N. (1931). Atomtheorie und Naturbeschreibung. Berlin: Springer. Translated as Bohr (1934).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, N. (1932). Chemistry and the Quantum Theory of Atomic Constitution (Faraday Lecture). Journal of the Chemical Society 1932, 349–384.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. (1933a). Lys og Liv. Naturens Verden 17, 49–59. Translated as Bohr (1933b).Google Scholar
Bohr, N. (1933b). Light and Life. Nature 131, 421–423, 457–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, N. (1934). Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. (1935a). Quantum Mechanics and Physical Reality. Nature 136, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, N. (1935b). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? Physical Review 48, 696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, N. (1949). Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics. In: Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Ed. by Schilpp, P. A.. Evanston, IL: The Library of Living Philosophers, 199–241.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. (1958). Quantum Physics and Philosophy. Causality and Complementarity. In: Philosophy in Mid-Century: A Survey – La philosophie au milieu du vingtième siècle: Chroniques. Ed. by Klibansky, R.. Firenze: La Nuova Italia, 308–314.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. (1985). Niels Bohr's Collected Works, Vol. 6, Foundations of Quantum Physics I (1926–1932). Ed. by Kalckar, J.. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. (1996). Niels Bohr's Collected Works, Vol. 7, Foundations of Quantum Physics II (1933–1958). Ed. by Kalckar, J.. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. and Rosenfeld, L. (1933). Zur Frage der Messbarkeit der elektromagnetis- chen Feldgrössen. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Mathematisk-fysiske Meddelelser 12 (8), 3–65.Google Scholar
Born, M. (1926a). Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge. Zeitschrift für Physik 37, 863–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. (1926b). Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge. Zeitschrift für Physik 38, 803–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. (1926c). Das Adiabatenprinzip in der Quantenmechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik 40, 167–192.Google Scholar
Born, M. (1929). Über den Sinn der physikalischen Theorien. Die Naturwissenschaften 17 (7), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. (1935a). The Restless Universe. Glasgow: Blackie & Son.Google Scholar
Born, M. (1935b). Atomic Physics. Glasgow: Blackie & Son.Google Scholar
Born, M. (1949). Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance. Waynflete Lectures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Born, M. and Heisenberg, W. (1928). La mécanique des quanta. In: Électrons et Photons: Rapports et Discussions du Cinquième Conseil de Physique Solvay. Ed. by Lorentz, H. A. and translated by Verschaffelt, J.-É.. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 143–181. Page references are to the English translation of the original German typescript in Bacciagaluppi and Valentini (2009), 372–401.Google Scholar
Born, M., Heisenberg, W. and Jordan, P. (1926). Zur Quantenmechanik II. Zeitschrift für Physik 35 (8–9), 557–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. and Infeld, L. (1934a). Foundations of a New Field Theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 144, 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. and Infeld, L. (1934b). On the Quantization of the New Field Equations I. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 147, 522–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. and Infeld, L. (1935). On the Quantization of the New Field Theory II. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 150, 141–166.Google Scholar
Born, M. and Schrödinger, E. (1935). The Absolute Field Constant in the New Field Theory. Nature 135, 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breit, G. (1929). The Effect of Retardation on the Interaction of Two Electrons. Physical Review 34 (4), 553–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breit, G. (1932). Dirac's Equation and the Spin–Spin Interactions of Two Electrons. Physical Review 39 (4), 616–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brillouin, M. (1933). Préface. In: E. Schrödinger, Mémoires sur la mécanique ondulatoire. Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan, v–xi.Google Scholar
Brown, H. (1978). Problems of Measurement in Quantum Theory. PhD Thesis. London: Chelsea College.Google Scholar
Brown, H. (1981). O debate Einstein-Bohr sobre a mecânica quântica. Cadernos de história e filosofia da ciência 2, 51–89.Google Scholar
Brown, H. (1986). The Insolubility Proof of the Quantum Measurement Problem. Founda- tions of Physics 16, 857–870.Google Scholar
Bub, J. (2010). Von Neumann's ‘Hidden Variables’ Proof: A Re-appraisal. Foundations of Physics 40 (9–10), 1333–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bub, J. (2011). Is von Neumann's ‘No Hidden Variables’ Proof Silly? In: Deep Beauty: Understanding the Quantum World through Mathematical Innovation. Ed. By, H. Halvorson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, P., Grabowski, M. and Lahti, P. (1997). Operational Quantum Physics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Busch, P., Lahti, P. and Mittelstaedt, P. (1991). The Quantum Theory of Measurement. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, P., Lahti, P., Pellonpää, J.-P. and Ylinen, K. (2016). Quantum Measurement. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camilleri, K. (2009). Heisenberg and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, N. R. (1921). Atomic Structure. Nature 107, 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, N. R. (1926). Time and Chance. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosoph- ical Magazine and Journal of Science 1 (5), 1106–1117.Google Scholar
Casimir, H. B. G. (2010). Haphazard Reality: Half a Century of Science. 2nd edition. New York: Harper & Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, J. and Kochen, S. (2006). The Free Will Theorem. Foundations of Physics 36 (10), 1441–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courant, R. and Hilbert, D. (1930). Methoden der mathematischen Physik. 2nd edition. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Crull, E. (2017). Hermann and the Relative Context of Observation. In: Grete Her- mann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. by Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 149–169.Google Scholar
Crull, E. (2022). Grete Hermann's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. In: Oxford Hand- book of the History of Quantum Interpretations. Ed. by Freire, O. et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 567–585.Google Scholar
Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G., eds. (2017a). Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G. (2017b). Grete Hermann's Lost Manuscript on Quantum Mechanics. In: Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. by Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 119–134.Google Scholar
de Regt, H. W. (1997). E. Schrödinger, Anschaulichkeit, and Quantum Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (4), 461–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derakhshani, M. (2017). Stochastic Mechanics without ad hoc Quantization: Theory and Applications to Semiclassical Gravity. PhD Thesis. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
Dickson, M. (2002a). The EPR Experiment: A Prelude to Bohr's Reply to EPR. In: History of Philosophy of Science. Ed. by Heidelberger, M. and Stadler, F.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, M. (2002b). Bohr on Bell: A Proposed Reading of Bohr and Its Implications for Bell's Theorem. In: Non-locality and Modality. Ed. by Placek, T. and Butterfield, J.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, M. (2004). Quantum Reference Frames in the Context of EPR. Philosophy of Science 71 (5), 655–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. (1928). The Quantum Theory of the Electron. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 117, 610–624.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. (1930). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. 1st English edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. (1932). Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 136, 453–464.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. (1934). Discussion of the Infinite Distribution of Electrons in the Theory of the Positron. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 30 (2), 150–163.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. (1935a). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. 2nd English edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. (1935b). Die Prinzipien der Quantenmechanik. 2nd German edition. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. (1936). Does Conservation of Energy Hold in Atomic Processes? Nature 137, 298–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M., Fock, V. A. and Podolsky, B. (1932). On Quantum Electrodynamics. Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion 2, 468–479.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. (1928). The Nature of the Physical World. The Gifford Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1921). Über ein den Elementarprozeß der Lichtemission betreffendes Exper- iment. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1921 (July– December), 882–883.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1932). Über die Unbestimmtheitsrelationen. Zeitschrift für angewandte Chemie 45 (1), 23. Editorial report (anon.) of Berlin colloquium in 1931.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1936). Physik und Realität. Journal of the Franklin Institute 221, 313–347. An English translation by Picard, J. appears in the same volume, pp. 349–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. (1953). Elementare Überlegungen zur Interpretation der Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. In: Scientific Papers Presented to Max Born on his Retirement from the Tait Chair of Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 33–40. Translated by Karanth, D. as ‘Elementary Consid- erations on the Interpretation of the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics’, arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.3701v1.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (2018a). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 15, The Berlin Years: Writings and Correspondence, June 1925–May 1927. Ed. by Kormos Buchwald, D. et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (2018b). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 15, The Berlin Years: Writings and Correspondence, June 1925–May 1927 (English Translation Supplement). Ed. by Kormos Buchwald, D. et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? Physical Review 47, 777–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. and Rosen, N. (1935). The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity. Physical Review 48, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A., Tolman, R. C. and Podolsky, B. (1931). Knowledge of Past and Future in Quantum Mechanics. Physical Review 37 (6), 780–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elby, A. and Bub, J. (1994). Triorthogonal Uniqueness Theorem and Its Relevance to the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Physical Review A 49 (5), 4213–4216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, H. (2012). The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Collected Works 1955–1980 with Commentary. Ed. by Barrett, J. A. and Byrne, P.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fermi, E. (1932). Quantum Theory of Radiation. Reviews of Modern Physics 4 (1), 87–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, A. (1981). Einstein's Critique of Quantum Theory: The Roots and Significance of EPR. In: After Einstein: Proceedings of the Einstein Centennial Celebration at Memphis State University, 14–16 March 1979. Ed. by Barker, P. and Shugart, C. G.. Memphis: Memphis State University Press, 147–158. Reprinted in Fine (1986), 26–39.Google Scholar
Fine, A. (1986). The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fine, A. (1994). Schrödinger's Version of EPR, and Its Problems. In: Patrick Suppes: Scientific Philosopher, Vol. 2. Ed. by Humphreys, P.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, A. (2007). Bohr's Response to EPR: Criticism and Defense. The Jerusalem Philo- sophical Quarterly 56, 31–56.Google Scholar
Fine, A. (2017). The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory. The Stan- ford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/qt-epr/. First published 10 May 2014; substantive revisions 31 October 2017.Google Scholar
Flint, H. T. (1935). Quantum Mechanics as a Physical Theory. Nature 135, 1025–1026.Google Scholar
Forman, P. (1973). Scientific Internationalism and the Weimar Physicists: The Ideology and Its Manipulation in Germany after World War I. Isis 64 (2), 151–180.Google Scholar
Frappier, M. (2017). ‘In the No-Man's Land Between Physics and Logic’: On the Dialec- tical Role of the Microscope Experiment. In: Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. by Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 85–105.Google Scholar
Furry, W. H. (1936a). Note on the Quantum-Mechanical Theory of Measurement. Physical Review 49, 393–399.Google Scholar
Furry, W. H. (1936b). Remarks on Measurement in Quantum Theory. Physical Review 49, 476.Google Scholar
Gamow, G. (1928). Zur Quantentheorie des Atomkernes. Zeitschrift für Physik 51 (3–4), 204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamow, G. (1966). Thirty Years that Shook Physics: The Story of Quantum Theory. New York: Doubleday & Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Goethe, J. W. von (1808). Faust. Eine Tragödie. Tübingen: Cotta.Google Scholar
Greenspan, N. (2005). The End of the Certain World: The Life and Science of Max Born. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hansen-Schaberg, I. (2017). A Biographical Sketch of Prof. Dr Grete Henry-Hermann (1901–1984). In: Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. by Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 3–16.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1926). Quantenmechanik. Die Naturwissenschaften 14, 989–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1927a). Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kine-matik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik 43 (3–4), 172–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1927b). Schwankungserscheinungen und Quantenmechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik 40 (7), 501–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1930a). Die physikalischen Prinzipien der Quantentheorie. Leipzig: S. Hirzel. Translated as Heisenberg (1930b).Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1930b). The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory. Translated by Eckart, C. and Hoyt, F. C.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Reprinted New York: Dover, 1949. Page references are to the Dover edition.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1930c). Versammlung der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte. Zeitschrift für angewandte Chemie 43 (38), 854. Editorial report (anon.) of various colloquia, including one by Heisenberg discussing his indeterminacy relation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1934). Wandlungen in den Grundlagen der exakten Naturwissenschaft in jüngster Zeit. Die Naturwissenschaften 22 (40), 669–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1935a). Bemerkungen zur Theorie des Atomkerns. In: Pieter Zeeman, 1865–25 mei – 1935: Verhandelingen op 25 mei 1935 aangeboden aan Prof. Dr. P. Zeeman. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1935b). Prinzipielle Fragen der modernen Physik. In: Wandlungen in den Grundlagen der Naturwissenschaft: Acht Vorträge von W. Heisenberg. Zürich: S. Hirzel, 35–46.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1935c). Die Struktur der leichten Atomkerne. Zeitschrift für Physik 96, 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1935d). Udviklingen af Kwantenteoriens principielle Grundlag efter 1925. Fysisk Tidsskrift 33, 96–101.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1969). Der Teil und das Ganze. Gespräche im Umkreis der Atomphysik. München: Piper. Translated as Heisenberg (1971).Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1971). Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. and Pauli, W. (1929). Zur Quantendynamik der Wellenfelder. Zeitschrift für Physik 56 (1–2), 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, W. and Pauli, W. (1930). Zur Quantendynamik der Wellenfelder II. Zeitschrift für Physik 59 (3–4), 168–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, C. (1998). Die Bohr-Einstein Debatte: Quantenmechanik und physikalische Wirk- lichkeit. Paderborn: Schöningh.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, G. (1935a). Die naturphilosophischen Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Abhandlungen der Fries'schen Schule 6 (2), 75–152. Reprinted as Hermann (1935c), and translated in Crull and Bacciagaluppi (2017), 239–278.Google Scholar
Hermann, G. (1935b). Die naturphilosophischen Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Die Naturwissenschaften 23 (42), 718–721. Translated in Lumma (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, G. (1935c). Die naturphilosophischen Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin: Verlag Öffentliches Leben.Google Scholar
Herrmann, K., ed. (2019). Grete Henry-Hermann: Philosophie – Mathematik – Quanten- mechanik. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywood, P. and Redhead, M. (1983). Nonlocality and the Kochen–Specker Paradox. Foundations of Physics 13 (5), 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, P. R. (2005). What's Wrong with Einstein's 1927 Hidden-Variable Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics? Foundations of Physics 35, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, D. (1985). Einstein on Locality and Separability. Studies in History and Philoso- phy of Science 16, 171–201.Google Scholar
Howard, D. (1990). ‘Nicht sein kann was nicht sein darf’, or the Prehistory of EPR, 1909–1935: Einstein's Early Worries about the Quantum Mechanics of Composite Systems. In: Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical and Physical Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Ed. by Miller, A. I.. New York: Plenum Press, 61–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, D. (1994). What Makes a Classical Concept Classical? Toward a Reconstruction of Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics. In: Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Ed. by Faye, J. and Folse, H. J.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, D. (2007). Revisiting the Einstein–Bohr Dialogue. The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 56, 57–90.Google Scholar
Jähnert, M. and Lehner, C. (2012). Early Debates about Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Jammer, M. (1974). The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective. Hoboken: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Joas, C. (2011). Schrödinger's Methodology of Physics: Application and Interpretation. Talk delivered at New Directions in the Foundations of Physics, 29 April–1 May 2011 in Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Joas, C. and Lehner, C. (2009). The Classical Roots of Wave Mechanics: Schrödinger's Transformations of the Optical-Mechanical Analogy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (4), 338–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, P. (1927). Über quantenmechanische Darstellung von Quantensprüngen. Zeitschrift für Physik 40, 661–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, P. and Pauli, W. (1928). Zur Quantenelektrodynamik ladungsfreier Felder. Zeit- schrift für Physik 47 (3–4), 151–173.Google Scholar
Kalckar, J. (1996). Part I – Introduction. In: Niels Bohr's Collected Works, Vol. 7, Foundations of Quantum Physics II (1933–1958). Ed. by Kalckar, J.. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 3–51.Google Scholar
Kemble, E. C. (1935). The Correlation of Wave Functions with the States of Physical Systems. Physical Review 47, 973–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M. J. (1970). The First Phase of the Bohr–Einstein Dialogue. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 2, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramers, H. A. (1933). Theorien des Aufbaues der Materie, I.: Die Grundlagen der Quan- tentheorie. Hand- und Jahrbuch der chemischen Physik, Vol. I. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Landau, L. and Peierls, R. (1931). Erweiterung des Unbestimmtheitsprinzips für die relativistische Quantentheorie. Zeitschrift für Physik 69 (1–2), 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laue, M. von (1931). Die dynamische Theorie der Röntgenstrahlinterferenzen in neuer Form. Ergebnisse der Exakten Naturwissenschaften 10, 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laue, M. von (1932). Zu den Erörterungen über Kausalität. Die Naturwissenschaften 20 (51), 915–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laue, M. von (1933). Materie und Raumerfüllung. Scientia 54, 402–412.Google Scholar
Laue, M. von (1934). Über Heisenbergs Ungenauigkeitsbeziehungen und ihre erkenntnis- theoretische Bedeutung. Die Naturwissenschaften 22 (26), 439–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laue, M. von (1935a). Der optische Reziprozitätssatz in Anwendung auf die Röntgen- strahlinterferenzen. Die Naturwissenschaften 23 (23), 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laue, M. von (1935b). Die Fluoreszenzröntgenstrahlung von Einkristallen (mit einem Anhang über Elektronenbeugung). Annalen der Physik, Fünfte Folge 23 (8), 705–746.Google Scholar
Lehner, C. (2011). The Prehistory of Entanglement, 1926–35. Talk delivered at New Directions in the Foundations of Physics, 29 April–1 May 2011 in Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Lumma, D. (1999). The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Philosophy of Nature. The Harvard Review of Philosophy VII, 35–44. Translation of Hermann (1935b), with introduction.Google Scholar
Majorana, E. (1933). Über die Kerntheorie. Zeitschrift für Physik 82, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malament, D. B. (1996). In Defense of Dogma: Why There Cannot Be a Relativistic Quantum Mechanics of (Localizable) Particles. In: Perspectives on Quantum Reality. Ed. by Clifton, R.. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–10.Google Scholar
Manzoni, A. (1840). I Promessi Sposi. 2nd revised edition. Milan: Guglielmini e Radaelli.Google Scholar
Margenau, H. (1932). Probability and Causality in Quantum Physics. The Monist 42 (2), 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margenau, H. (1936). Quantum-Mechanical Description. Physical Review 49, 240–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margenau, H. (1937). Critical Points in Modern Physical Theory. Philosophy of Science 4 (3), 337–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKie, D. and Heathcote, N. H. de V. (1935). The Discovery of Specific and Latent Heats. London: Edward Arnold & Co.Google Scholar
Meitner, L. (1927). Über den Aufbau des Atominnern. Die Naturwissenschaften 15 (16), 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meitner, L. (1934). Atomkern und periodisches System der Elemente. Die Naturwis- senschaften 22 (44), 733–739.Google Scholar
Meyenn, K. von, ed. (2011). Eine Entdeckung von ganz ausserordentlicher Tragweite: Schrödingers Briefwechsel zur Wellenmechanik und zum Katzenparadoxon. Vols. 1–2. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mises, R. von (1931). Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und ihre Anwendung in der Statistik und theoretischen Physik. Leipzig: Deuticke.Google Scholar
Møller, C. (1931). Über den Stoß zweier Teilchen unter Berücksichtigung der Retardation der Kräfte. Zeitschrift für Physik 70 (11–12), 786–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, W. (1989). Schrödinger: Life and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, C. (1910). Palmström. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
Muller, F. A. (1997). The Equivalence Myth of Quantum Mechanics: Parts I and II. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28, 35–61, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, F. A. (1999a). The Equivalence Myth of Quantum Mechanics (Addendum). Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 30 (4), 543–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, F. A. (1999b). The Locality Scandal of Quantum Mechanics. In: Language, Quantum, Music. Ed. by Dalla Chiara, M. L., Giuntini, R. and Laudisa, F.. Dordrecht: Springer, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrvold, W. C. (2003). On Some Early Objections to Bohm's Theory. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, E. (1966). Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics. Physical Review 150, 1079–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, E. (1985). Quantum Fluctuations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, J. von (1927). Wahrscheinlichkeitstheoretischer Aufbau der Quantenmechanik. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch- Physikalische Klasse 1927, 245–272.Google Scholar
Neumann, J. von (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer. Translated by Beyer, R. T. as von Neumann (1955).Google Scholar
Neumann, J. von (1955). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Norsen, T. (2015). Are There Really Two Different Bell's Theorems? arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05017.Google Scholar
Pais, A. (1982). 'Subtle is the Lord…’: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pauli, W. (1933). Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellenmechanik. In: Handbuch der Physik. Ed. by Geiger, H. and Scheel, K.. 2nd ed. Vol. XXIV(1). Berlin: Springer, 83–272.Google Scholar
Pauli, W. (1979). Wolfgang Pauli: Scientific Correspondence with Bohr, Einstein, Heisen- berg a.o., Vol. 1, 1919–1929. Ed. by von Meyenn, K.. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Pauli, W. (1985). Wolfgang Pauli: Scientific Correspondence with Bohr, Einstein, Heisen- berg a.o., Vol. II, 1930–1939. Ed. by von Meyenn, K.. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Pauli, W. (1990). Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellenmechanik. Berlin: Springer. Reprint of the second edition of Pauli (1933) with introduction and historical notes by Straumann, N..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peierls, R. (1934). The Vacuum in Dirac's Theory of the Positive Electron. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 146, 420–441.Google Scholar
Planck, M. (1900a). Über irreversible Strahlungsvorgänge. Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge 1 (1), 69–122.Google Scholar
Planck, M. (1900b). Zur Theorie des Gesetztes der Energieverteilung im Normalspektrum. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft, Zweite Folge 2 (17), 237–245.Google Scholar
Planck, M. (1906). Vorlesungen über die Theorie der Wärmestrahlung. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1934). Zur Kritik der Ungenauigkeitsrelationen. Die Naturwissenschaften 22 (48), 807–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1935). Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar
Przibram, K., ed. (1967). Letters on Wave Mechanics. New York: Philosophical Library. Originally published as Briefe zur Wellenmechanik. Wien: Springer, 1963.Google Scholar
Rosen, N. (1931). The Normal State of the Hydrogen Molecule. Physical Review 38, 2099–2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, N. (1985). Quantum Mechanics and Reality. In: 50 Years of the Einstein–Podolsky– Rosen Gedankenexperiment. Ed. by Lahti, P. and Mittelstaedt, P.. Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, Joensuu, Finland, 16–20 June 1985. Singapore: World Scientific, 17–33.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, L. (1967). Niels Bohr in the Thirties. In: Niels Bohr: His Life and Work as Seen by His Friends and Colleagues. Ed. by Rozenthal, S.. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 114–137.Google Scholar
Ruark, A. E. (1935). Is the Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Com- plete? Physical Review 48, 466–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheibe, E. (1973). The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Translated by Sykes, J. B..Google Scholar
Schilpp, P. A., ed. (1949). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Evanston, IL: The Library of Living Philosophers.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1917). Die Ergebnisse der neueren Forschung über Atom- und Moleku- larwärmen. Die Naturwissenschaften 5, 537–543, 561–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1926a). Zur Einsteinschen Gastheorie. Physikalische Zeitschrift 27, 95–101.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1926b). Über das Verhältnis der Heisenberg-Born-Jordanschen Quanten- mechanik zu der meinen. Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge 79, 734–756.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1926c). Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (dritte Mitteilung: Störungs- theorie, mit Anwendung auf den Starkeffekt der Balmerlinien). Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge 80, 437–490.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1926d). Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (vierte Mitteilung). Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge 81, 109–139.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1927). Energieaustausch nach der Wellenmechanik. Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge 83 (15), 956–968.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1928a). La mécanique des ondes. In: Électrons et Photons: Rapports et Discussions du Cinquième Conseil de Physique Solvay. Ed. by Lorentz, H. A. and translated by Verschaffelt, J.-É.. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 185–213. English translation of the original German typescript and of the published discussion in Bacciagaluppi and Valentini (2009), 406–431.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1928b). Abhandlungen zur Wellenmechanik. 2nd enlarged edition. Leipzig: J. A. Barth. Translated by Shearer, J. F. and Deans, W. M. as Schrödinger (1928c).Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1928c). Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics. Glasgow: Blackie & Son.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1928d). Four Lectures on Wave Mechanics. Glasgow: Blackie & Son.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1928e). Der erkenntnistheoretische Wert physikalischer Modellvorstellungen. In: Jahresbericht des Physikalischen Vereins zu Frankfurt am Main 1928/29. Frankfurt: Physikalischer Verein, 44–51. Translated by Johnston, W. H. as ‘Conceptual Models in Physics and their Philosophical Value’ in Schrödinger (1935d), 119–132. Page references are to this translation.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1929a). Was ist ein Naturgesetz? Die Naturwissenschaften 17 (1), 9–11. Translated by Murphy, J. as ‘What is a Law of Nature?’ in Schrödinger (1935d), 107–118. Page references are to this translation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1929b). Neue Wege in der Physik. Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift 50, 15–16.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1929c). Die Erfassung der Quantengesetze durch kontinuierliche Funktio- nen. Die Naturwissenschaften 17 (26), 486–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1929d). Das Gesetz der Zufälle. Die Koralle 5, 417–418. Translated by Murphy, J. as ‘The Law of Chance’ in Schrödinger (1935d), 33–42. Page references are to this translation.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1929e). Das Rätsel des Lichtes. Die Koralle 5, 294–298.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1929f). Antrittsrede des Hrn. SCHRÖDINGER. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-Mathematische Klasse, C–CII.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1930). Was ist eigentlich Elektrizität? Die Koralle 6, 110–112.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1931a). Über die Umkehrung der Naturgesetze. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-Mathematische Klasse 8–9, 144–153.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1931b). Spezielle Relativitätstheorie und Quantenmechanik. Sitzungs- berichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-Mathematische Klasse 12, 238–247.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1932a). Sur la theórie relativiste de l’électron et l’interprétation de la mécanique quantique. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré 2, 269–310.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1932b). Anmerkungen zum Kausalproblem. Erkenntnis 3, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1932c). Über Indeterminismus in der Physik. In: Über Indeterminismus in der Physik. Ist die Naturwissenschaft milieubedingt? Zwei Vorträge zur Kritik der naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis. Leipzig: J. A. Barth, 1–24. Translated by Johnston, W. H. as ‘Indeterminism in Physics’ in Schrödinger (1935d), 43–65. Page references are to this translation.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1932d). Ist die Naturwissenschaft milieubedingt? In: Über Indeterminis- mus in der Physik. Ist die Naturwissenschaft milieubedingt? Zwei Vorträge zur Kritik der naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis. Leipzig: J. A. Barth, 25–62. Freely translated by Murphy, J. as Schrödinger (1935b) and Schrödinger (1935c).Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1932e). Über Indeterminismus in der Physik – Ist die Naturwissenschaft milieubedingt? Zwei Vorträge zur Kritik der naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1933). Mémoires sur la mécanique ondulatoire. Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan. Translation by A. Proca of Schrödinger (1928b), with a Preface by M. Brillouin (see Brillouin 1933), and a new introduction and notes by the author.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1934). Über die Unanwendbarkeit der Geometrie im Kleinen. Die Naturwissenschaften 22 (31), 518–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1935a). Der Grundgedanke der Wellenmechanik. In: Les Prix Nobel en 1933. Stockholm: Norstedt & Söner, 1–13. Translated by Murphy, J. as ‘The Fundamen- tal Idea of Wave Mechanics’ in Schrödinger (1935d), 133–154. Page references are to this translation.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1935b). Is Science a Fashion of the Times? In: Science and the Human Temperament. London: George Allen & Unwin, 66–85. Free translation by Murphy, J. of sections I–II of Schrödinger (1932d).Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1935c). Physical Science and the Temper of the Age. In: Science and the Human Temperament. London: George Allen & Unwin, 86–106. Free translation by Murphy, J. of section III of Schrödinger (1932d).Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1935d). Science and the Human Temperament. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1935e). Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Sys- tems. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 31 (4), 555–563.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1935f). Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik, I–III. Die Naturwissenschaften 23 (48–50), 807–812, 823–828, 844–849. Translated in Trimmer (1980). Page references are to this translation and to its reprint in this volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1935g). Contributions to Born's New Theory of the Electromagnetic Field. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 150, 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1935h). La nueva mecánica ondulatoria. Cursos de la universidad internacional de verano en Santander, vol. 1. Madrid: Signo, 1–73.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1935i). ¿Son lineales las verdaderas ecuaciones del campo electromag- nético? Anales de la sociedad española de física y química 33, 511–517.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1936). Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 32, 446–452.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1957). Science, Theory and Man. New York: Dover. Augmented edition of Schrödinger (1935d).Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1962). Die Wandlung des physikalischen Weltbegriffs. In: Was ist ein Naturgesetz? Beiträge zum naturwissenschaftlichen Weltbild. München and Wien: Oldenbourg, 18–26.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1984). Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Wien/Braunschweig: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften/Vieweg.Google Scholar
Seevinck, M. (2017). Challenging the Gospel: Grete Hermann on von Neumann's No- Hidden-Variables Proof. In: Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. By, E. Crull and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 107–117.Google Scholar
Slater, J. C. (1929). Physical Meaning of Wave Mechanics. Journal of the Franklin Institute 207 (4), 449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soler, L. (2017). The Convergence of Transcendental Philosophy and Quantum Physics: Grete Henry-Hermann's 1935 Pioneering Proposal. In: Grete Hermann: Between Physics and Philosophy. Ed. by Crull, E. and Bacciagaluppi, G.. Berlin: Springer, 55–69.Google Scholar
Stairs, A. (1978). Quantum Mechanics, Logic and Reality. PhD Thesis. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Stöltzner, M. (1999). Vienna Indeterminism: Mach, Boltzmann, Exner. Synthese 119 (1–2), 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauschinsky, A. and van Dongen, J. (2008). Over lichtemissie: Albert Einstein en de vroege geschiedenis van de Nederlandse Natuurkundige Vereniging. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Natuurkunde 74, 90–93.Google Scholar
Temple, G. (1935). The Fundamental Paradox of the Quantum Theory. Nature, 957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimmer, J. D. (1980). The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics: A Translation of Schrödinger's ‘Cat Paradox’. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 124 (5), 323–338.Google Scholar
Uffink, J. (2007). Compendium to the Foundations of Classical Statistical Physics. In: Handbook of the Philosophy of Physics. Ed. by Butterfield, J. and Earman, J.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 924–1074.Google Scholar
Uffink, J. (2017). The Prehistory of Entanglement: Schrödinger and the Development of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Experiment. Talk delivered at the 25th International Congress of History of Science and Technology, 23–29 July 2017 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
Uffink, J. (2018). Schrödinger and the EPR Argument. Talk delivered at the Foundations of Physics Seminar, Utrecht University, 30 November 2018.Google Scholar
Uffink, J. (2020). Schrödinger's Reaction to the EPR Paper. In: Quantum, Probability, Logic: Itamar Pitowsky's Work and Influence. Ed. by Hemmo, M. and Shenker, O.. Berlin: Springer, 545–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dongen, J. (2007a). Emil Rupp, Albert Einstein, and the Canal Ray Experiments on Wave–Particle Duality: Scientific Fraud and Theoretical Bias. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37 (supp.), 73–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dongen, J. (2007b). The Interpretation of the Einstein–Rupp Experiments and Their Influence on the History of Quantum Mechanics. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37 (supp.), 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dongen, J. (2015). Communicating the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relations: Niels Bohr, Complementarity and the Einstein–Rupp Experiments. In: One Hundred Years of the Bohr Atom. Ed. by Aaserud, F. and Kragh, H.. Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Danske Videskabernes Selskab, 310–343.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. C. (1974). The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Paradox. Synthese 29 (1–4), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallstrom, T. C. (1994). Inequivalence between the Schrödinger Equation and the Madelung Hydrodynamic Equations. Physical Review A 49, 1613–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weismann, A. (1892). Das Keimplasma: Eine Theorie der Vererbung. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Weisskopf, V. (1935). Probleme der neueren Quantentheorie des Elektrons. Die Naturwis-senschaften 23 (37–39), 631–637, 647–653, 669–674.Google Scholar
Weizsäcker, C. F. von (1931). Ortsbestimmung eines Elektrons durch ein Mikroskop. Zeitschrift für Physik 70 (1–2), 114–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wentzel, G. (1926). Zwei Bemerkungen über die Zerstreuung korpuskularer Strahlen als Beugungserscheinung. Zeitschrift für Physik 40, 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, J. A. and Zurek, W. H., eds. (1983). Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, M. A. B. (2004). The EPR Paper and Bohr's Response: A Re-assessment. Foundations of Physics 34, 1305–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wick, G. C. (1935). Teoria dei raggi β e momento magnetico del protone. Rendiconti della Reale accademia nazionale dei Lincei 21, 170–173.Google Scholar
Wolfe, H. C. (1936). Quantum Mechanics and Physical Reality. Physical Review 49, 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×