Book contents
- The End of the Eurocrats' Dream
- The End of the Eurocrats' Dream
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- 1 The retransformation of Europe
- 2 The costs of non-disintegration: the case of the European Monetary Union
- 3 Sharing the Eurocrats' dream: a demoicratic approach to EMU governance in the post-crisis era
- 4 Neumark vindicated: the three patterns of Europeanisation of national tax systems and the future of the social and democraticRechtsstaat
- 5 What Europe does to citizenship
- 6 Silencing the Eurocrats in public crisis politics
- 7 Conflict-minimising integration: how the EU achieves massive integration despite massive protest
- 8 An unholy trinity of EU Presidents?: Political accountability of EU executive power
- 9 The limits of collective action and collective leadership
- 10 Europe’s legitimacy problem and the courts
- 11 Crisis reconfiguration of the European constitutional state
- 12 Integration through law and the crisis of law in Europe's emergency
- Index
- References
12 - Integration through law and the crisis of law in Europe's emergency
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
Book contents
- The End of the Eurocrats' Dream
- The End of the Eurocrats' Dream
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- 1 The retransformation of Europe
- 2 The costs of non-disintegration: the case of the European Monetary Union
- 3 Sharing the Eurocrats' dream: a demoicratic approach to EMU governance in the post-crisis era
- 4 Neumark vindicated: the three patterns of Europeanisation of national tax systems and the future of the social and democraticRechtsstaat
- 5 What Europe does to citizenship
- 6 Silencing the Eurocrats in public crisis politics
- 7 Conflict-minimising integration: how the EU achieves massive integration despite massive protest
- 8 An unholy trinity of EU Presidents?: Political accountability of EU executive power
- 9 The limits of collective action and collective leadership
- 10 Europe’s legitimacy problem and the courts
- 11 Crisis reconfiguration of the European constitutional state
- 12 Integration through law and the crisis of law in Europe's emergency
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The End of the Eurocrats' DreamAdjusting to European Diversity, pp. 299 - 338Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Abelshauser, W. (2014) ‘Europa in Vielfalt einigen. Eine Denkschrift’. www.homes.uni-bielefeld.de/wabelsha/Denkschrift.pdf.Google Scholar
Adamski, D. (2012) ‘National Power Games and Structural Failures in the European Macroeconomic Governance’, Common Market Law Review, 49(4), 1319–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamski, D. (2013) ‘Europe's (Misguided) Constitution of Economic Prosperity’, Common Market Law Review, 50(1), 47–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamski, D. (2014) ‘The ESMA Doctrine: A Constitutional Revolution and the Economics of Delegation’, European Law Review, 39(6), 812–34.Google Scholar
Akrivopoulou, C. (2013) ‘Facing l'état d'exception: The Greek Crisis Jurisprudence’, International Journal of Constitutional Law Blog, 11 July 2013. www.iconnectblog.com/2013/07/facing-letat-dexception-the-greek-crisis-jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Azoulai, L. (2013) ‘The European Court of Justice and the Duty to Respect Sensitive National Interests’, in Dawson, M., de Witte, B. and Muir, E. (eds), Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice: Causes, Responses and Solutions, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 167–87.Google Scholar
Barnard, C. (2012) ‘The Financial Crisis and the Euro Plus Pact: A Labour Lawyer's Perspective’, Industrial Law Journal, 41(1), 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C. (2013) ‘The Charter, the Court – and the Crisis’ (6 August 2013), University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 18/2013.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2013) ‘An Ever Closer Union among the Peoples of Europe: Republican Intergovernmentalism and Demoicratic Representation within the EU’, Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, A. (2013) ‘An Asymmetric Two-level Game: Parliaments in the Euro Crisis’, in Crum, B. and Fossum, J. (eds), Practices of Inter-Parliamentary Coordination in International Politics – The European Union and Beyond, London: Routledge, 125–40.Google Scholar
Biebricher, T., Hien, J., Jabko, N., and Chari, A. (2013) ‘Critical Exchange on Neoliberalism and Europe: Europe and the Political Philosophy of Neoliberalism’, Contemporary Political Theory, 12(4), 338–75.Google Scholar
Blom-Hansen, J., and Brandsma, G. (2009) ‘The EU Comitology System: Intergovernmental Bargaining and Deliberative Supranationalism?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(4), 719–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W. (1978) ‘Der verdrängte Ausnahmezustand. Zum Handeln der Staatsgewalt in außergewöhnlichen Lagen’, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 31, 1881–90.Google Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W. (2010) ‘Kennt die europäische Not kein Gebot? Die Webfehler der EU und die Notwendigkeit einer neuen politischen Entscheidung’ [Does necessity not know rules? Design flaws of the EU and the necessity of a new political decision], Neue Züricher Zeitung, 21 June.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. (2012) ‘The European Redistributive State and a European Law of Struggle’, European Law Journal, 18(5), 667–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, D. (2009) Executive Power of the European Union: Law, Practices and the Living Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, B. (2007) ‘The Constitutionalisation of the EEC/EC: West Germany between Legal Sovereignty and European Integration 1949–1974’, PhD thesis, King's College London.Google Scholar
de Búrca, G., and Scott, J. (eds) (2006) New Governance, Law and Constitutionalism, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Dehousse, R. (ed.) (1994) Europe after Maastricht: An Ever Closer Union?, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Dehousse, R., and Weiler, J. (1990) ‘The Legal Dimension’, in Wallace, W. (ed.), The Dynamics of European Integration, London: Pinter, 242–60.Google Scholar
Dyson, K. (2013) ‘Sworn to Grim Necessity? Imperfections of European Economic Governance, Normative Political Theory, and Supreme Emergency’, Journal of European Integration, 35(3), 207–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, B. (2015) Hall of Mirrors: The Great Depression, The Great Recession, and the Uses and Misuses of History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
European Commission (1985) ‘White Paper on Completion of the Internal Market’, COM (85) 310 final.Google Scholar
European Commission (2012) ‘A Blueprint for a Deep and Genuine Economic and Monetary Union: Launching a European Debate’, COM (2012) 777/Final 2.Google Scholar
Everson, M. (2014) ‘An Exercise in Legal Honesty: Rewriting the Court of Justice and the Bundesverfassungsgericht’, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Political Science Series, 136/2014.Google Scholar
Falke, J. (2014) ‘Comitology After Lisbon: What is Left of Comitology as we Have Praised it?’, in Joerges, C. and Glinski, C. (eds), The European Crisis and the Transformation of Transnational Governance: Authoritarian Managerialism versus Democratic Governance, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 271–92.Google Scholar
Feld, L. (2011) ‘Ein Scheitern ist nicht eingeplant, oder: Ordnungspolitische Prinzipien der Europäischen Währungsunion’, Impulsrede zur Sozialen Marktwirtschaft, Wirtschaftspolitischer Club Deutschland e.V. www.wpcd.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Impulsreden_2011_und_2010_Schriftenreihe_WPCD.pdf.Google Scholar
Feld, L. (2012) ‘Europa in der Welt von heute: Wilhelm Röpke und die Zukunft der Europäischen Währungsunion’, Hamburgisches Weltwirtschaftsinstitut Policy Paper 70. http://roepke.hwwi.de/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A. (2014) ‘Human Rights in Times of Austerity Policy: The EU Institutions and the Conclusion of Memoranda of Understanding’, legal opinion commissioned by the Chamber of Labour, Vienna, Baden-Baden. www.jura.uni-bremen.de/institute/zentrum-fuer-europaeische-rechtspolitik/aktuelles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossum, J.-E. (2014) ‘The Structure of EU-representation and the Crisis’, in Sandra, Kröger (ed.), Political Representation in the European Union: Still Democratic in Times of Crisis?, Abingdon and NewYork: Routledge, 140–75.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, G. (2010) Staatstechnik: Perspektiven auf Rechtsstaat und Ausnahmezustand, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gosewinkel, D. (2010) ‘“Beim Staat geht es nicht allein um macht, sondern um die staatliche Ordnung als Freiheitsordnung”. Biographoisches Interview mit Ernst-Wofgang Böckenförde’, in E.-W. Böckenförde, ‘Kennt die europäische Not kein Gebot? Die Webfehler der EU und die Notwendigkeit einer neuen politischen Entscheidung’, Neue Züricher Zeitung, 21 June, 305–86.Google Scholar
Grimm, D. (2015) ‘The Democratic Costs of Constitutionalization: The European Case’, European Law Journal, 21(4), 460–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guérot, U., and Dullien, S. (2012) ‘The Long Shadow of Ordo-Liberalism: Germany's Approach to the Euro Crisis’. www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR49_GERMANY_BRIEF_AW.pdf.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (2014) ‘Varieties of Capitalism and the Euro Crisis’, West European Politics, 37(6), 1223–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallerberg, M., Marzinotti., B., and Wolff, G. (2012) ‘An Assessment of the European Semester’, study commissioned by the European Parliament, Brussels. www.europarl.europa.eu/studies.Google Scholar
Hassemer, W. (2012) ‘Is There No Time for the Law?’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 28 June.Google Scholar
Höpner, M. (2014) ‘Wie der Europäische Gerichtshof und die Kommission Liberalisierung durchsetzen: Befunde aus der MPIfG-Forschungsgruppe zur Politischen Ökonomie der europäischen Integration’, MPIfG DP 2014/8, Cologne.Google Scholar
Innerarity, D. (2015) ‘Images of Europe around the Crisis’, The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms, 20(1). www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10848770.2014.984981#.VM4FTy6AqT0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, M. (2014) ‘EU Financial Assistance Conditionality’, Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 74(1), 61–104.Google Scholar
Ipsen, H-P. (1969) ‘Zur Verfassung der fusionierten Gemeinschaft’, Integration, 1(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
Iversen, T., and Soskice, D. (2013) ‘A Structural-Institutional Explanation of the Eurozone Crisis’, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Department of Government.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. (1996) ‘The Market without a State? States without Markets? Two Essays on the Law of the European Economy’, San Domenico di Fiesole, EUI Working Paper Law 1/96.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. (1997) ‘The Impact of European Integration on Private Law: Reductionist Perceptions, True Conflicts and a New Constitutional Perspective’, European Law Journal, 3(4), 378–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, C. (2005) ‘Rethinking European Law's Supremacy: A Plea for a Supranational Conflict of Laws’ (with comments by Damian Chalmers, Rainer Nickel, Florian Rödl and Robert Wai), San Domenico di Fiesole, EUI Working Paper Law 12/2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, C. (2007) ‘Integration through De-legislation? An Irritated Heckler’, European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) No. N-07-03.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. (2014a) ‘Conflicts-Law Constitutionalism: Ambitions and Problems’, in Cremona, M., et al. (eds.), Reflections on the Constitutionalisation of International Economic Law: Liber Amicorum for Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 111–37.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. (2014b) ‘Legitimacy without Democracy in the EU? Perspectives on the Constitutionalization of Europe’, in Poiares Maduro, M., Tuori, K. and Sankari, S. (eds), Transnational Law: Rethinking European Law and Legal Thinking, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 248–68.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. (2014c): ‘Europe's Economic Constitution in Crisis and the Emergence of a New Constitutional Constellation’, German Law Journal, 15(5), 985–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, C., and Glinski, C. (eds) (2014) The European Crisis and the Transformation of Transnational Governance: Authoritarian Managerialism versus Democratic Governance, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Joerges, C., and Neyer, J. (1997) ‘From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology’, European Law Journal, 3(2), 273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, C., and Neyer, J. (2014) ‘Deliberativer Supranationalismus in der Krise’, in Flugel-Martinsen, O., et al. (eds), Deliberative Kritik – Kritik der Deliberation. Festschrift für Rainer Schmalz-Bruns, Wiesbaden: Springer, 353–72.Google Scholar
Joerges, C., and Schmid, C. (2004) ‘Towards Proceduralization of Private Law in the European Multi-Level System’, in Hartkamp, A., et al. (eds), Towards a European Civil Code, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 4th edn, 277–310.Google Scholar
Joerges, C., and Weimer, M. (2014) ‘A Crisis of Executive Managerialism in the EU: No Alternative?’, in de Búrca, G., Kilpatrick, C. and Scott, J. (eds), Liber Amicorum for David M Trubek, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 295–322.Google Scholar
Joerges, C., Kjaer, P., and Ralli, T. (2011) ‘Conflicts Law as Constitutional Form in the Postnational Constellation’, Transnational Legal Theory, 2(2) 152–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, C., Mény, Y., and Weiler, J. (2002) ‘Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance’, European University Institute-Robert Schumann Centre/ NYU School of Law Jean Monnet Center.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, M. (1997) Europäische Integration und Semokratieprinzip, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Kirchhof, P. (2012) ‘Verfassungsnot!’, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 20 July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konrad, K, (2014) ‘Balancing Austerity and Strategies for Growth’, CFA Institute Conference Proceedings Quarterly, 31(2), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, T, (2012) ‘Es geht nicht ohne internationalen Ordnungsrahmen – Zum Verhältnis von Markt und Staat im Angesicht der Finanzkrise’, Amos international: Internationale Zeitschrift für christliche Sozialethik, 6, 8–14.Google Scholar
Kuo, M.-S. (2014) ‘The Moment of Schmittian Truth: Conceiving of the State of Exception in the Wake of the Financial Crisis’, in Joerges, C. and Glinski, C. (eds), The European Crisis and the Transformation of Transnational Governance: Authoritarian Managerialism versus Democratic Governance, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 83–100.Google Scholar
Ladeur, K.-H. (2014) ‘Conflicts Law as Europe's Constitutional Form … and the Conflict of Social Norms as its Infrastructure’, in Joerges, C. and Glinski, C. (eds), The European Crisis and the Transformation of Transnational Governance: Authoritarian Managerialism versus Democratic Governance, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 203–26.Google Scholar
Leaman, J. (2001) The Bundesbank Myth: Towards a Crique of Central Bank Independence, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkofridi, Z., and Schmitter, P. (2015) ‘Transcending or Descending? European Integration in Times of Crisis’, European Political Science Review, 7(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorz, A., and Sauer, H. (2012) ‘Ersatzunionsrecht und Grundgesetz. Verfassungsrechtliche Zustimmungsgrundlagen für den Fiskalpakt, den ESM-Vertrag und die Änderung des AEUV’, Die öffentliche Verwaltung, 573–82.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1993) ‘The European Community between Social Policy and Social Regulation’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(1), 153–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (2014) Rethinking the Union of Europe Post-Crisis – Has Integration Gone Too Far? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manow, P. (2015) ‘Social Protection, Capitalist Production: The Bismarckian Welfare State in the German Political Economy 1880–2010’, unpublished habilitation thesis, Constance (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Maurer, A. (2013) ‘From EMU to DEMU: The Democratic Legitimacy of the EU and the European Parliament’, IAI Working Papers 13/11 (April).Google Scholar
Mestmäcker, E.-J. (1973) ‘Power, Law and Economic Constitution’, German Economic Review, 2, 177–98.Google Scholar
Mestmäcker, E.-J. (2011) ‘Der Schamfleck ist die Geldverachtung’ [The shaming flaw is the disdainfulness of money], Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 18 November.Google Scholar
Mestmäcker, E.-J. (2012) ‘Ordnungspolitische Grundlagen einer politischen Union’ [Foundational principles for the ordering of a political union], Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 12 November.Google Scholar
Müller, J.-W. (2003) A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolaïdes, K. (2013) ‘European Demoicracy and its Crisis’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 311–39.Google Scholar
Ohlin Report (1956) ‘International Labour Organisation, Social Aspects of European Economic Co-operation, Report by a Group of Experts’ (summary), International Labour Review, 74, 9–123.Google Scholar
Poiares Maduro, M. (2012) ‘A New Governance for the European Union and the Euro: Democracy and Justice’, European Parliament, September 2012. www.europarl.europa.eu/studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, J. (2014) ‘Compounded Representation in the EU: No Country for Old Parliaments?’, in Kröger, S. (ed.), Political Representation in the European Union: Still Democratic in Times of Crisis? Abingdon and NewYork: Routledge, 37–69.Google Scholar
Preuß, U. (2013) ‘Gibt es eine völkerrechtliche Demokratietheorie?’, in Heinig, H. and Terhechte, J. (eds), Postnationale Demokratie, Postdemokratie, Neoetatismus : Wandel klassicher Demokratievorstellungen in der Rechtswissenschaft, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 169–84.Google Scholar
Rödl, F., and Callsen, R. (2014) ‘The Struggle for Union Rights under the Euro and the Dialectics of Social Integration’, in Joerges, C. and Glinski, C., The European Crisis, Oxford, Hart, 101–22.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. (1982) ‘International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, International Organization, 36(2), 375–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruser, A. (2014) ‘The EU's New Economic Governance is Blurring the Boundaries between European Competences and Domestic Sovereignty’, LSE. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2014/01/30/the-eus-new-economic-governance-is-blurring-the-boundaries-between-european-competences-and-domestic-sovereignty.Google Scholar
Sabel, C., and Zeitlin, J. (2007) ‘Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union’, EUROGOV Working Paper No. C-07-02. http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2011/2466/pdf/egp_connex_C_07_02.pdf.Google Scholar
Sabel, C., and Zeitlin, J. (2012) Experimentalism in the EU: Common Ground and Persistent Differences, Regulation and Governance, 6(3), 410–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. (1994) ‘Autonomieschonend und gemeinschaftsverträglich: Zur Logik der europäischen Mehrebenenpolitik’, in Scharpf, F. (ed.), Optionen des Föderalismus in Deutschland und Europa. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 131–55.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. (1997) ‘Introduction. The Problem-solving Capacity of Multi-level Governance’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 520–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. (2002) ‘The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 645–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. (2013) ‘Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Disabling of Democratic Accountability’, in Streeck, W. and Schäfer, A. (eds), Politics in the Age of Austerity, Cambridge: Polity, 108–42.Google Scholar
Schepel, H. (2013) ‘The New Approach to the New Approach: The Juridification of Harmonized Standards in EU Law’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 12(4), 521–33.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1989)[1921] Die Diktatur. Von den Anfängen des modernen Souveränitätsgedankens bis zum proletarischen Klassenkampf, 5th edn, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Steffek, J. (2006) Embedded Liberalism and its Critics: Justifying Global Governance in the American Century, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffek, J. (2014) ‘The Cosmopolitanism of David Mitrany: Equality, Devolution, and Functional Democracy beyond the State’, International Relations. http://ire.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/07/17/0047117814526608.abstract.Google Scholar
Streit, M., and Mussler, W. (1995) ‘The Economic Constitution of the European Community. From “Rome” to “Maastricht”’, European Law Journal, 1(1), 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, D, and Trubek, L. (2005) ‘Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of Social Europe: the Role of the Open Method of Co-ordination’, European Law Journal, 11(3), 343–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, K, and Tuori, K. (2014) The Eurozone Crisis: A Constitutional Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauchez, A. (2013) ‘Brokering Europe Euro-Lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity’, LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 19/2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viellechner, L. (2012) ‘Berücksichtigungspflicht als Kollisionsregel: Zu den innerstaatlichen Wirkungen von völkerrechtlichen Verträgen und Entscheidungen internationaler Gerichte, insbesondere bei der Auslegung und Anwendung von Grundrechten’, in Matz-Lück, N. and Hong, M. (eds), Grundrechte und Grundfreiheiten im Mehrebenensystem: Konkurrenzen und Interferenzen, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 109–59.Google Scholar
von Hayek, F. (1948) ‘The Economic Conditions of Interstate Federalism’, in Von Hayek, F., Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 255–72.Google Scholar
Von Hayek, F. (1989) ‘The Pretence of Knowledge’, American Economic Review, 79(1), 3–7.Google Scholar
Von Hayek, F. (2002) ‘Competition as a Discovery Procedure’, Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(1), 9–23.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. (1991) ‘The Transformation of Europe’, Yale Law Journal, 100(8), 2403–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J. (1995) ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution? Reflections on Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision’, European Law Journal, 1(1), 219–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weimer, M. (2015) Constitutionalising EU Administrative Risk Governance, Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wendel, M. (2013) ‘Richterliche Rechtsvergleichung als Dialogform: Die Integrationsrechtsprechung nationaler Verfassungsgerichte in gemeineuropäischer Perspektive‘, Der Staat, 52(3), 339–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigger, A. (2008) ‘Competition for Competitiveness: The Politics of the Transformation of the EU Competition Regime’, PhD thesis, VU Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- 25
- Cited by