Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The crisis of classical political economy and attempts at reconstruction, 1870–1885
- 2 Foreigners, forerunners, and the Irish contribution to historical economics
- 3 Statistics, historical economics, and economic history
- 4 Historical economics at Oxford
- 5 W. J. Ashley: the English socialist of the chair and the evolution of capitalism
- 6 Historical economics at Marshall's Cambridge: H.S. Foxwell and the irregularity of capitalism
- 7 Economic history and neomercantilism: William Cunningham and J. S. Nicholson
- 8 W. A. S. Hewins and the Webbs: applied economics, economic history, and the LSE
- 9 Conclusion and epilogue
- Notes
- Selected bibliography
- Index
1 - The crisis of classical political economy and attempts at reconstruction, 1870–1885
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The crisis of classical political economy and attempts at reconstruction, 1870–1885
- 2 Foreigners, forerunners, and the Irish contribution to historical economics
- 3 Statistics, historical economics, and economic history
- 4 Historical economics at Oxford
- 5 W. J. Ashley: the English socialist of the chair and the evolution of capitalism
- 6 Historical economics at Marshall's Cambridge: H.S. Foxwell and the irregularity of capitalism
- 7 Economic history and neomercantilism: William Cunningham and J. S. Nicholson
- 8 W. A. S. Hewins and the Webbs: applied economics, economic history, and the LSE
- 9 Conclusion and epilogue
- Notes
- Selected bibliography
- Index
Summary
The 1870s and 1880s were the formative years of English historical economics. The late 1860s and the 1870s have been called the crisis of the old English political economy. Until the publication of Marshall's Principles in 1890, the immensely popular economic writings of J.S. Mill remained the dominant work in economics and served to shore up the illusion that the classical postulates, deductive methodology, and policy conclusions inherited from the Ricardians remained valid into the last third of the nineteenth century. As we will see, however, Mill's methodology, theory, and policy conclusions seriously compromised the Ricardian structure. Indeed, the economic views of Mill offered a significant opening for the heretical views of several of the historical economists. The last of the classical economists, J.E. Cairnes, sought to repair what he saw as dangerous tendencies in Mill's work by returning to a more rigorous deductive method and by disassociating economic theory from its popular policy maxims. Cairnes's efforts, however, only deepened the crisis of classical economics. Finally, during these same years the brilliant work of W.S. Jevons and Alfred Marshall laid the foundations for neoclassical theory. Before 1885, however, neoclassical theory had not yet become the dominant school of economics in England.
The crisis of political economy
To celebrate the one-hundredth anniversary of the publication of the Wealth of Nations, the Political Economy Club, itself nearly a half century old, held a centenary dinner at the Pall Mall Restaurant on May 31, 1876.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- English Historical Economics, 1870–1926The Rise of Economic History and Neomercantilism, pp. 10 - 31Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1988