Book contents
- The Epistemology of Reading and Interpretation
- The Epistemology of Reading and Interpretation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Knowing and Reading
- Chapter 2 Reading and Understanding
- Chapter 3 Sources of Knowledge and Their Individuation
- Chapter 4 Why Reading Doesn’t Reduce Either to Attending to Testimony or to Perception
- Chapter 5 Reading as a Source of Knowledge
- Chapter 6 The Objects of Reading Are the Products of Writing
- Chapter 7 Texts, Meanings, and Interpretation
- Chapter 8 Knowledge through Interpretation (1)
- Chapter 9 Knowledge through Interpretation (2)
- References
- Index
Chapter 9 - Knowledge through Interpretation (2)
Holism, Reconstruction, Externalism, and Reader Response
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 September 2021
- The Epistemology of Reading and Interpretation
- The Epistemology of Reading and Interpretation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Knowing and Reading
- Chapter 2 Reading and Understanding
- Chapter 3 Sources of Knowledge and Their Individuation
- Chapter 4 Why Reading Doesn’t Reduce Either to Attending to Testimony or to Perception
- Chapter 5 Reading as a Source of Knowledge
- Chapter 6 The Objects of Reading Are the Products of Writing
- Chapter 7 Texts, Meanings, and Interpretation
- Chapter 8 Knowledge through Interpretation (1)
- Chapter 9 Knowledge through Interpretation (2)
- References
- Index
Summary
This chapter discusses four more accounts of interpretation. First, the notion of a holistic textual act is introduced, which is an act performed by an author through the production of an entire text. It is argued that there is a kind of interpretation that aims to grasp an author's holistic textual act (which is, or is part of, the author's meaning), and the epistemological aspects of it are discussed. Next, externalist interpretations are discussed, the hallmark of which is that they don't aim to specify author's meanings but rather indicative or expressive meanings. Such interpretations, it is argued, may perhaps never reach the exalted status of knowledge. I then criticize Stanley Fish’s reader-response theory of interpretation because it flies in the face of a number of commonsense assumptions about texts, authors, and meanings. Finally, it is argued that reading and interpretation (on any of the accounts discussed) are distinct and different acts, and that there can be reading without interpretation, even if in actual fact the two usually go together.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Epistemology of Reading and Interpretation , pp. 208 - 233Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021