Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:33:26.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

47 - Should We Tell the Parents?

Balancing Science and Children’s Needs in a Longitudinal Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
Affiliation:
Temple University
Marsha Weinraub
Affiliation:
Temple University
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Susan T. Fiske
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

The research described in this chapter was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) through a cooperative agreement (U10), which calls for scientific collaboration between the grantees and the NICHD staff. Hirsh-Pasek and Weinraub were both participating scientists in this project.

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the United States was engaged in a massive natural experiment. More than 52% of women with children under age 6 had entered the workforce, and a new term, “dual career families,” was born. In this context, families wrestled with the question of whether they should send their young children to childcare and just how much alternative care was good or bad for their babies.

At the time, the scientii c community offered parents a mixed bag of advice. Some studies stressed the importance of maternal care and found that placing children in childcare was a risk (Belsky, 1999 , 2001 ; White, 1985 ). Others reported the opposite effects, demonstrating cognitive and social boosts from playing with other children in childcare (Clarke-Stewart, Gruber & Fitzgerald, 1994 ; Lamb, 1998 ). Still others suggested that placing a child in childcare had little or no effect on child outcomes (e.g., Scarr, 1998 ). Moving from the science to more personal accusations, there were assertions that the positive results from childcare studies emerged only when women were the experimenters, and counterclaims also emerged that i ndings against using childcare were promulgated by researchers searching to maintain an Ozzy and Harriet caricature of the mom at home. No broad spectrum and dei nitive research on the topic had been conducted – until now.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Case Studies and Commentaries
, pp. 145 - 148
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The Belmont Report. (1979). Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Retrieved Nov. 14, 2014, from .
Belsky, J. (1999). Quantity of nonmaternal care and boys’ problem behavior/adjustment at 3 and 5: Exploring the mediating role of parenting. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 62, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J. (2001). Developmental risks (still) associated with early child care. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 845–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke-Stewart, K. A., Gruber, C. P., & Fitzgerald, L. M. (1994). Children at home and in day care. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lamb, M. (1998). Nonparental child care: Context, quality, correlates and consequences. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Sigel, I. E. & Renninger, K. A. (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 4. Child psychology in practice (5th Edition, pp. 73–133). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Scarr, S. (1998). American child care today. American Psychologist, 53, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, B. (1985). The first three years of life. Revised edition. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×