Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:05:21.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 22 - Brain-Machine Interface Technology in Neurosurgery

from Part III - Future Developments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2020

By
Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld  and
Marike Broekman
Edited by
Stephen Honeybul
Stephen Honeybul
Affiliation:
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Royal Perth and Fiona Stanley Hospitals
Get access

Summary

Diseases of the nervous system are an enormous burden to patients and society. Brain computer interfaces (BCIs) aim to improve or even eliminate the handicaps associated with these diseases by linking the brain and a computer via scalp, subdural, or intracortical electrodes. The transfer of information to and from the brain can be used to restore function. This chapter starts with a brief introduction to the recent history of BCIs, followed by the main topic of this chapter: the ethical challenges associated with BCIs. The ethical issues to be discussed include agency and identity, privacy, security, and informed consent. The management of patient and family expectations and balancing the risks and benefits of BCIs are also explored. Establishing the efficacy of BCIs and the challenges related to the principles of justice are also discussed. BCIs could potentially be used to enhance normal function, and this raises many ethical questions. In the last part of this chapter, future directions of BCIs including potential technical advances such as connectivity of the brain to ‘the cloud’ and ‘brain nets’ will be outlined. The challenges outlined in this chapter need to be addressed, both by those responsible for the technical development of BCIs, but also by neurosurgeons, policy makers, and law makers.

Keywords

brain computer interfaceneurobionicsethicsneurosurgeryneuroprosthetics
Type
Chapter
Information
Ethics in Neurosurgical Practice , pp. 224 - 233
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rosenfeld, J. V., Wong, Y. T. Neurobionics and the brain-computer interface: current applications and future horizons. Med. J. Aust. 2017; 206: 363–8.Google Scholar
Martin, S., Iturrate, I., Millan, J. D. R., et al. Decoding inner speech using electrocorticography: progress and challenges toward a speech prosthesis. Front Neurosci. 2018; 12: 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burwell, S. M., Sample, M., Racine, E. Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review. BMC Med. Ethics 2017; 18: 60.Google Scholar
Klein, E. Informed consent in implantable BCI research: identifying risks and exploring meaning. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2016; 22: 1299–1317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clausen, J., Fetz, E., Donoghue, J., et al. Help, hope, and hype: ethical dimensions of neuroprosthetics. Science 2017; 356: 1338–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuste, R., Goering, S., Arcas, B. A. Y., et al. Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature 2017; 551: 159–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vidal, J. Real-time detection of brain events in EEG. IEEE Proceedings 1977; 65 : 633–44.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. M., Ayton, L. N., Guymer, R. H., et al. Advances in implantable bionic devices for blindness: a review. ANZ J. Surg. 2016; 86: 654–9.Google Scholar
Hochberg, L. R., Serruya, M. D., Friehs, G. M., et al. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature 2006; 442: 164–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deadwyler, S. A., Berger, T. W., Sweatt, A. J., et al. Donor/recipient enhancement of memory in rat hippocampus. Front Syst. Neurosci. 2013; 7: 120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deadwyler, S. A., Hampson, R. E., Song, D., et al. A cognitive prosthesis for memory facilitation by closed-loop functional ensemble stimulation of hippocampal neurons in primate brain. Exp. Neurol. 2017; 287: 452–60.Google Scholar
Oxley, T. J., Opie, N. L., John, S. E., et al. Minimally invasive endovascular stent-electrode array for high-fidelity, chronic recordings of cortical neural activity. Nature Biotech. 2016; 34: 320–7.Google Scholar
Roskies, A. L., Agency and intervention. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2015 370: 20140215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, F., Cook, M., OBrien, T., et al. Embodiment and estrangement: results from a first-in-human intelligent BCI trial. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2019; 25(1): 83–96.Google Scholar
Lane, F. J., Huyck, M., Troyk, P., et al. Responses of potential users to the intracortical visual prosthesis: final themes from the analysis of focus group data. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2012; 7: 304–13.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. C. Critiquing the concept of BCI illiteracy. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2019; 25(4): 1217–33.Google Scholar
Thomson, E. E., Carra, R., Nicolelis, M. A. Perceiving invisible light through a somatosensory cortical prosthesis. Nat. Commun. 2013; 4: 1482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pais-Vieira, M., Chiuffa, G., Lebedev, M., et al. Building an organic computing device with multiple interconnected brains. Sci. Rep. 2015; 5: 11869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramakrishnan, A., Ifft, P. J., Pais-Vieira, M., et al. Computing arm movements with a monkey brainet. Sci. Rep. 2015; 5: 10767.Google Scholar
Grau, C., Ginhoux, R., Riera, A., et al. Conscious brain-to-brain communication in humans using non-invasive technologies. PLoS One 2014; 9: e105225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoo, S. S., Kim, H., Filandrianos, E., et al. Non-invasive brain-to-brain interface (BBI): establishing functional links between two brains. PLoS One 2103; 8: e60410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×