Book contents
- The Ethics of Social Punishment
- The Ethics of Social Punishment
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Part I The Descartes Lectures 2018
- Chapter 1 Defining Social Punishment
- Chapter 2 Justifying Social Punishment
- Chapter 3 Practicing Social Punishment
- Part II Commentaries
- Part III Replies
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 2 - Justifying Social Punishment
from Part I - The Descartes Lectures 2018
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2020
- The Ethics of Social Punishment
- The Ethics of Social Punishment
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Part I The Descartes Lectures 2018
- Chapter 1 Defining Social Punishment
- Chapter 2 Justifying Social Punishment
- Chapter 3 Practicing Social Punishment
- Part II Commentaries
- Part III Replies
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
What is the proper aim of socially punitive responses to wrongdoing? The usual contenders in the debates about the justification of criminal punishment – retributivist, utilitarian, expressivist, and communicative theories – all encounter problems as accounts of social punishment. This chapter argues that the general justifying aim of social punishment is to pressure wrongdoers to make amends for their own transgressions. The view combines both desert and instrumental conditions for punishment but develops distinctive accounts of each.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Ethics of Social PunishmentThe Enforcement of Morality in Everyday Life, pp. 24 - 46Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020