Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:09:56.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Chasing the Dog in Etruria and Anatolia

Connections, Context, and Meaning

from Part V - Shared and Distinct Iconographies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2023

Elizabeth P. Baughan
Affiliation:
University of Richmond, Virginia
Lisa C. Pieraccini
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

Close examination of Etruscan and Anatolian depictions of dogs from the sixth century BCE reveals curious connections and a common artistic language. In fact, the context, medium, and style of dogs are so strikingly similar that these depictions merit review not just for their shared artistic styles but also customs and values. Dogs at banquets, chariot races, and hunting scenes speak to analogous aristocratic practices in two distinctly different regions. The premise for this study is not necessarily to discover who did what first, because our evidence from the ancient world is so fragmentary, but to explore how these two regions, separated by quite a distance, practiced artistic exchange. One exceptional example of a very unique dog-lead shows that technology was also shared vis-à-vis dogs. Since poetry and monuments have dominated the discourse in ancient Mediterranean studies for centuries, such topics as comparing detailed depictions of dogs can further enhance our understanding of exchange in the ancient Mediterranean.

Type
Chapter
Information
Etruria and Anatolia
Material Connections and Artistic Exchange
, pp. 234 - 249
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Åkerström, Å. 1966. Die architektonischen Terrakotten Kleinasiens. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Åkerström, Å. 1981. “Etruscan Tomb Painting: An Art of Many Faces,” Opuscula Romana 13: 734.Google Scholar
Avramidou, A. 2009. “The Phersu Game Revisited,” Etruscan Studies 12: 7387.Google Scholar
Baughan, E. P. 2011. “Sculpted Symposiasts of Ionia,” American Journal of Archaeology 115(1): 1953.Google Scholar
Baughan, E. P. 2013. Couched in Death: Klinai and Identity in Anatolia and Beyond. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Boschin, F., Bernardini, F., Pilli, E., Vai, S., Zanolli, C., Tagliacozzo, A., Fico, R., et al. 2020. “The First Evidence for Pleistocene Dogs in Italy,” Scientific Reports 10: 13313.Google Scholar
Camporeale, G. 1984. La Caccia in Etruria. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Carpenter, T. H. 1986. Dionysian Imagery in Archaic Greek Art: Its Development in Black-Figure Vase Painting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, T. H. 1991. Art and Myth in Ancient Greece. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Greenewalt, C. H. 2010. “Lydian Pottery,” in The Lydians and Their World, ed. Cahill, N. D., 106124. Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Hanfmann, G. M. A. 1961. “The Third Campaign at Sardis (1960),” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 162: 849.Google Scholar
Harnwell Ashmead, A. 1994. “Etruscan Domesticated Cats: Classical Conformists or Etruscan Originals?” in Murlo and the Etruscans: Art and Society in Ancient Etruria, ed. De Puma, R. D. and Small, J. P., 144164. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Iozzo, M. 2013. “The Dog: A Dionysian Animal?Rivista di Archeologia (2012) 36: 522.Google Scholar
Isler-Kerenyi, C. 2007. Dionysos in Archaic Greece: An Understanding through Images. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jannot, J.-R. 1984. Les reliefs archaiques de Chiusi. Rome: École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Jannot, J. R. 1993. “Phersu Phersuna, Persona. À propos du masque étrusque,” in Spectacles et scénques dans le monde étrusco-italique: actes de la table ronde, ed. Thuillier, J. P., 281320. Rome: École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, K., Boehlau, J., Dalman, K. O., Schefold, K., Kjellberg, E., and Åkerstrom, Å. 1940. Larisa am Hermos: Die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen, 1902–1934, II: Die architektonischen Terrakotten. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Mellink, M. J. 1974a. “Excavations at Karataş-Semayük and Elmalı, Lycia, 1973,” American Journal of Archaeology 78: 351359.Google Scholar
Mellink, M. J. 1974b. “Notes on Anatolian Wall Painting,” in Mélanges Mansel, ed. Akurgal, E. and Alkım, U., 537547. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basimevi.Google Scholar
Mellink, M. J. Bridges, R. A., Jr., and di Vignale, F. C. 1998. Kızılbel: An Archaic Painted Tomb Chamber in Northern Lycia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum.Google Scholar
Miller, M. C. 2011. “‘Manners Makyth Man’: Diacritical Drinking in Achaemenid Anatolia,” in Cultural Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean, ed. Gruen, E., 97134. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
Pieraccini, L. 2003. Around the Hearth: Caeretan Cylinder-Stamped Braziers. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschenider.Google Scholar
Pieraccini, L. 2014a. “Artisans and Their Lasting Impressions: Clay Stamping and Craft Connectivity at Caere during the 6th Century BCE,” Etruscan Studies 17(2): 140153.Google Scholar
Pieraccini, L. 2014b. “The Ever Elusive Etruscan Egg,” Etruscan Studies 17(2): 267292.Google Scholar
Pieraccini, L. in press. “Dining with the Dead: Visual Meals, Memory & Symbolic Consumption in Etruscan Tomb Painting,” in Consumption, Ritual and Society: Recent Finds and Interpretive Approaches to Food and Drink in Etruria, ed. Pieraccini, L. and Taylor, L.. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Rathje, A. 1994. “Banquet and Ideology: Some New Considerations about Banqueting at Poggio Civitate,” in Murlo and the Etruscans: Art and Society in Ancient Etruria, ed. De Puma, R. D. and Small, J. P., 9599. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Rathje, A. 2007. “Murlo, Images and Archaeology,” Etruscan Studies 10: 175184.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. 1977. The Archaic Style in Greek Sculpture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shear, T. L. 1926. Sardis, Vol. X.1. Architectural Terra-Cottas. Cambridge: The University Press.Google Scholar
Siddiq, A. B., Onar, V., Mutuş, R., and Poradowski, D. 2021. “The Iron Age Dogs from Alaybeyi Höyük, Eastern Anatolia,” Animals 11(4): 1163, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041163.Google Scholar
Small, J. P. 1994. “Eat, Drink, and Be Merry: Etruscan Banquets,” in Murlo and the Etruscans: Art and Society in Ancient Etruria, ed. De Puma, R. D. and Small, J. P., 8594. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Steingräber, S. 2006. Abundance of Life: Etruscan Wall Painting, trans. Russell Stockman. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Steingräber, S., Ridgway, D., and Ridgway, F. R. (eds.) 1986. Etruscan Painting. Catalogue Raisonné of Etruscan Wall Paintings. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Strandberg Olofsson, M. 2006. “Creatures Great and Small: Animals on Etrusco-Italic Architectural Terracotta Reliefs,” in Across Frontiers: Etruscans, Greeks, Phoenicians and Cypriots, ed. Herring, E., Lemos, I., Schiavo, F. L., Vagnetti, L., Whitehouse, R., and Wilkins, J., 517528. London: Accordia Research Institute.Google Scholar
Winter, N. A. 2009. Symbols of Wealth and Power: Architectural Terracotta Decoration in Etruria and Central Italy, 640–510 B.C. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Winter, N. A. 2013. “Confronti fra scene su bracieri e pithoi ceretani e terrecotte architettoniche,” in Mediterranea: Studi e Ricerche a Tarquinia e in Etruria, ed. Gentili, M. D. and Maneschi, L., 8596. Rome: Fabrizio Serra.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×