Book contents
- The European Union and Customary International Law
- The European Union and Customary International Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Cases
- Treaties
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I A View from the Outside
- 1 Applicability of Customary International Law to the European Union as a Sui Generis International Organization
- 2 Is the European Union a Sui Generis International Organization?
- 3 The European Union’s Role in the Making and Confirmation of Customary International Law
- Part II Looking in Between
- Part III A View from the Inside
- Index
1 - Applicability of Customary International Law to the European Union as a Sui Generis International Organization
An International Law Perspective
from Part I - A View from the Outside
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2022
- The European Union and Customary International Law
- The European Union and Customary International Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Cases
- Treaties
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I A View from the Outside
- 1 Applicability of Customary International Law to the European Union as a Sui Generis International Organization
- 2 Is the European Union a Sui Generis International Organization?
- 3 The European Union’s Role in the Making and Confirmation of Customary International Law
- Part II Looking in Between
- Part III A View from the Inside
- Index
Summary
The EU functions as a receptor and promoter of customary international law (CIL). However, from a theoretical (and international law) perspective, the questions why and when the EU is bound by CIL still have not been answered in definite terms. This chapter argues that the EU should be afforded a similar treatment as is afforded to (newly independent) states. This is based on a close examination of its practice in the field of international humanitarian law (IHL), where the primary organization tasked with ensuring peace and security – the United Nations – has so far avoided explicitly affirming that it is bound by customary IHL. After showing that it is indeed the EU which might bear direct responsibility in the context of military operations authorized under the Common Security and Defence Policy, the chapter examines the EU’s behaviour when it comes to new regulatory efforts, its executive and operational conduct, and the CJEU’s case law. On the basis thereof, it is concluded that the EU’s practice confirms the theoretical conclusions reached, and that therefore any theoretical uncertainties on whether and why international organizations are bound by CIL might in future be answered by paying closer attention to their practice.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The European Union and Customary International Law , pp. 7 - 47Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022