Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2021
ABSTRACT
While the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) does not require states to elevate children's rights to constitutional status, in recent years various European countries have discussed whether to include specific child rights in their constitutions. This contribution illustrates the remarkably different approach towards the constitutionalisation of the rights of the child shown by Austria, Germany and Italy. Against this background, this contribution explores how these different constitutional perspectives might impact the criminal regulation of ‘sexting’, that is, the consensual exchange of sexual content via information and communications technology. This emerging issue, at the crossroads of the recognition of children's right to privacy and the need to protect them from sexual abuse and child pornography, provides an intriguing setting in which to examine the actual influence of children's human rights. Drawing on this analysis, this contribution argues that a clear constitutional recognition of children's rights may advance their actual implementation in legislation. Furthermore, it elaborates on some key requirements that a rights-based criminal regulation of consensual sexting should fulfil. Child participation in particular is needed in order for the legislator to appreciate the children's situation in full and acknowledge children as full rights-holders. Linking constitutional and criminal law, this contribution provides a thorough analysis of the three countries’ stances towards the rights of the child, as well as their actual relevance as regards a highly sensitive issue with which most legislatures are currently struggling.
INTRODUCTION
While almost all global states have ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC, the Convention), there is less consensus whether children's rights should be acknowledged by domestic constitutional law. The recognition of children's rights at the constitutional level has been the subject of sparse but pivotal pieces of research. is contribution will qualitatively analyse how the Convention has had constitutional implementation in selected European countries, stimulating normative changes or nourishing a scholarly discussion. To this end, it will take a closer look at Austria, Germany and Italy. While these countries are clearly not representative of the various national stances within Europe, they show a remarkably different constitutional approach in this regard.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.