Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:33:37.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2022

Jason Rosenhouse
Jason Rosenhouse
Affiliation:
James Madison University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Failures of Mathematical Anti-Evolutionism , pp. 275 - 284
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Applebaum, D. (1996). Probability and Information: An Integrated Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asimov, I. (1997). The army of the night. In Asimov, I. (ed.) The Roving Mind. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Atkins, P. (1984). The Second Law. New York: Scientific American Books – W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Atkins, P. (2010). The Laws of Thermodynamics: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Avise, J. C. (2010). Inside the Human Genome: A Case for Non-Intelligent Design. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axe, D. (2004). Estimating the prevalence of protein sequences adopting functional enzyme folds. Journal of Molecular Biology. 341(5): 1295–1315.Google Scholar
Axe, D. (2016). Undeniable: How Biology Confirms Our Intuitions that Life Is Designed. New York: HarperOne.Google Scholar
Barash, D. P. (2003). The Survival Game: How Game Theory Explains the Biology of Cooperation and Competition. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Beeby, M., Ferreira, J. L., Tripp, P., Albers, S.-V., and Mitchell, D. R. (2020). Propulsive nanomachines: The convergent evolution of archaella, flagella, and cilia. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 44(3): 253–304.Google Scholar
Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Behe, M. J. (2007). The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Behe, M. J. (2020). A Mousetrap For Darwin: Michael J. Behe Answers his Critics. Seattle: Discovery Institute Press.Google Scholar
Berkman, M. and Plutzer, E. (2010). Evolution, Creationism, and the Battle to Control America’s Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, E. H. (1944). Evolution and entropy. Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute. 76: 1–27.Google Scholar
Blancke, S., Boudry, M., and Braeckman, J. (2011). Simulation of biological evoluation under attack, but not really: A response to Meester. Biology and Philosophy. 26(1): 113–118.Google Scholar
Blum, H. (1951). Time’s Arrow and Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bridgman, P. (1961). The Nature of Thermodynamics. 2nd ed. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Brillouin, L. (1949). Life, thermodynamics, and cybernetics. American Scientist. 37(4): 554–568.Google Scholar
Bunn, E. (2009). Evolution and the second law of thermodynamics. American Journal of Physics. 77(10): 922–925.Google Scholar
Burling, R. (1953). Evolution and thermodynamics. Science Education. 37(3): 184.Google Scholar
de Camp, L. Sprague (1968). The Great Monkey Trial. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Carrier, R. C. (2004). The argument from biogenesis: Probabilities against a natural origin of life. Biology and Philosophy. 21(5): 739–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. B. (2007). God as genetic engineer. Science. 316(5380): 1427–1428.Google Scholar
Clark, R. E. D. (1943). Evolution and entropy. Journal of the Transactions of the Victoria Institute. 75: 49–71.Google Scholar
Conway Morris, S. (2003). Life’s Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, J. (2009). Why Evolution Is True. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Crosby, J. L. (1967). Computers in the study of evolution. Science Progress. 55(218): 279–292.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. New York: Gramercy Books, 1979 reprint edition.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1862). On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids Are Fertilised by Insects, and on the Good Effects of Intercrossing. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker: How the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1996). Climbing Mount Improbable. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (2003). A Devil’s Chaplain: Reflections on Hope, Lies, Science, and Love. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (2009). The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dembski, W. A. (1998). The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities. cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dembski, W. A. (1999). Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science and Theology. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Dembski, W. A. (2002). No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot be Purchased Without Intelligence. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dembski, W. A. (2004). The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions About Intelligent Design. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Dembski, W. A. (2005). Specification: The pattern that signifies intelligence. Online at https://billdembski.com/documents/2005.06.Specification.pdf. Last accessed December 2021.Google Scholar
Divine, S. (2014). An algorithmic information challenge to intelligent design. Zygon. 49(1): 42–65.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher. 35(3): 125–129.Google Scholar
Dronamraju, K. (2011). Haldane, Mayr, and Beanbag Genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryden, T. F., Thomson, A. R., and White, J. H. (2008). How much of protein sequence space has been explored by life on Earth? Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 5(25): 953–956.Google Scholar
Dugatkin, L. A. and Reeve, H. K. eds. (1998). Game Theory and Animal Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. (1929). The Nature of the Physical World. New York: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
Elsberry, W. and Shallit, J. (2011). Information theory, evolutionary computation, and Dembski’s “complex specified information.” Synthese. 178(2): 237–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, J. (2020). Every Life Is on Fire: How Thermodynamics Explains the Origins of Living Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
English, T. (2017). Evo-info review: Do not buy the book until …. Online at www.theskepticalzone.com/wp/evo-info-review-do-not-buy-the-book-until/ Last accessed December 2021.Google Scholar
Ferrada, E. and Wagner, A. (2010). Evolutionary innovations and the organization of protein functions in genotype space. PLoS ONE. 5(11): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. (1935). The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Fitelson, B., Stephens, C., and Sober, E. (1999). How not to detect design—Critical notice: William A. Dembski, The Design Inference. Philosophy of Science. 66(3): 472–488.Google Scholar
Fogel, L. J. (1999). Intelligence Through Simulated Evolution: Forty Years of Evolutionary Programming. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Forbes, N. (2004). Imitation of Life: How Biology Is Inspiring Computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forrest, B. and Gross, P. R. (2003). Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, D. (1999). Proving God exists. The Saturday Evening Post. November–December: 59–61, 78, 80–81, 84.Google Scholar
Gavrilets, S. (2010). High-dimensional fitness landscapes and speciation. In: Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Pigliucci, M. and Mueller, G., eds. Cambridge: MIT Press. 45–80.Google Scholar
Gillespie, J. H. (2004). Population Genetics: A Concise Guide. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gishlick, A. (2004). Evolutionary paths to irreducible complexity: The avian flight apparatus. In: Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism. Young, M., Edis, T., eds. 58–71.Google Scholar
Gitt, W. (2001). In the Beginning Was Information. Germany: Christliche Literatur-Verbreitung.Google Scholar
Gitt, W., Compton, R., and Fernandez, J. (2011). Biological information – What is it? In: Biological Information: New Perspectives. Marks II, R. J., Behe, M. J., Dembski, W. A., Gordon, B. L., Sanford, J. C., eds. Singapore: World Scientific. 11–25.Google Scholar
Glaeser, G. and Paulus, H. F. (2015). The Evolution of the Eye. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2001). Information and the argument from design. In: Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics. Pennock, R. T., ed. Cambridge: MIT Press. 575–596.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. and Goldstein, I. (1993). The Refrigerator and the Universe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1980). The Panda’s Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1988). Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1993). Eight Little Piggies: Reflections in Natural History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gowers, T. (2002). Mathematics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, A. (1876). Darwiniana: Essays and Reviews Pertaining to Darwinism. New York: D. Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
Gregory, T. R. (2008). The evolution of complex organs. Evolution: Education and Outreach. 1(4): 358–389.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. (2001). Genetic information: A metaphor in search of a theory. Philosophy of Science. 68(3): 394–412.Google Scholar
Hafer, A. (2015). The Not-So-Intelligent Designer: Why Evolution Explains the Human Body and Intelligent Design Does Not. Eugene: Cascade Books.Google Scholar
Häggström, O. (2007). Intelligent design and the NFL theorems. Biology and Philosophy. 22(2): 217–230.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. (1968). Evolution: What is required of a theory? Science. 160(3826): 408.Google Scholar
Hazen, R. M., Griffin, P. L., Carothers, J. M., and Szostak, J. W. (2007). Functional information and the emergence of biocomplexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104(supp. 1): 8574–8581.Google Scholar
Ho, M. (1997). The Rainbow and the Worm: The Physics of Organisms. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Hopkins, B. and Wilson, R. (2004). The truth about Königsberg. College Mathematics Journal. 35(3): 198–207.Google Scholar
Hunt, A. (2007). Axe (2004) and the evolution of enzyme function. Online at: https://pandasthumb.org/archives/2007/01/92-second-st-fa.html. Last accessed February 2021.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Isaac, R. (2017). Review of Introduction to Evolutionary Informatics by Marks II, R. J., Dembski, W. A., and Ewert, W.. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith. 69(2): 99–104.Google Scholar
Isaak, M. (2007). The Counter-Creationism Handbook. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. (1991). Darwin on Trial. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. (2000). The Wedge of Truth: Splitting the Foundations of Naturalism. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. (1961). Natural selection as the process of accumulating genetic information in adaptive evolution. Genetics Research. 2(1): 127–140.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (2007). Living With Darwin: Evolution, Design, and the Future of Faith. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, F. (1999). Shuffled cards, messy desks, and disorderly dorm rooms— Examples of entropy increase? Nonsense! Journal of Chemical Education. 76(10): 1385–1387.Google Scholar
Lambert, F. (2002). Disorder—A cracked crutch for supporting entropy discussions. Journal of Chemical Education. 79(2): 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, M. and Nilsson, D-E. (2012). Animal Eyes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, N. (2015). The Vital Question: Energy, Evolution, and the Origins of Complex Life. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Larson, E. (2020). Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America’s Continuing Debate Over Science and Religion. (Reprint of the original 2000 edition with a new afterword.) New York: Hachette.Google Scholar
Lecomte du Noüy, P. (1947). Human Destiny. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Leff, H. S. (2012). Removing the mystery of entropy and thermodynamics—Part V. Physics Teacher. 80(5): 274–276.Google Scholar
Lehman, J., Clune, J., Misevic, D., et al. (2020). The surprising creativity of digital evolution: A collection of anecdotes from the evolutionary computation and artificial life research communities. Artificial Life. 26(2): 274–306.Google Scholar
Lemons, D. (2009). Mere Thermodynamics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lemons, D. (2019). Thermodynamic Weirdness: From Fahrenheit to Clausius. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lenski, R. E., Ofria, C., Pennock, R. T., and Adami, C. (2003). The evolutionary origin of complex features. Nature. 423(6936): 139–144.Google Scholar
Lents, N. H. (2018). Human Errors: A Panaroma of Our Glitches, From Pointless Bones to Broken Genes. Boston: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
Lloyd, B. (2012). Is there any conflict between evolution and the second law of thermodynamics? The Mathematical Intelligencer. 34(1): 29–33.Google Scholar
Losos, J. B. (2011). In the Light of Evolution: Essays from the Laboratory and Field. Greenwood Village: Roberts and Co.Google Scholar
Losos, J. B. (2018). Improbable Destinies: Fate, Chance, and the Future of Evolution. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
Losos, J. B. and Lenski, R. E. (2016). How Evolution Shapes Our Lives: Essays on Biology and Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. (2005). Simple evolutionary pathways to complex proteins. Protein Science. 14(9): 2217–2225.Google Scholar
Marks II, R. J., Behe, M. J., Dembski, W. A., Gordon, B. L., and Sanford, J. C. eds. (2013). Biological Information: New Perspectives. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks II, R. J., Dembski, W. A., and Ewert, W. (2017). Introduction to Evolutionary Informatics. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Matzke, N. (2007). The edge of creationism. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 22(11): 566–567.Google Scholar
Matzke, N. (2009). But isn’t it creationism? In: But Is it Science? The Philosophical Question in the Evolution/Creation Controversy. Pennock, R. and Ruse, M., eds. 377–413. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Mayfield, J. E. (2013). The Engine of Complexity: Evolution as Computation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1992). Byte-sized evolution. Nature. 355(6363): 772–773.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. C. (2009). Information and entropy—top-down or bottom-up development in living systems? International Journal of Design & Nature Ecodynamics. 4(4): 351–385.Google Scholar
McLennan, D. A. (2008). The concept of co-option: Why evolution often looks miraculous. Evolution: Education and Outreach. 1(3): 247–258.Google Scholar
McNamara, J. M. and Leimer, O. (2020). Game Theory in Biology: Concepts and Frontiers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McNickle, G. G. and Dybzinski, R. (2013). Game theory and plant ecology. Ecology Letters. 16(4): 545–555.Google Scholar
Meester, R. (2009). Simulation of biological evolution and the NFL theorems. Biology and Philosophy. 24(4): 461–472.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. (2013). Darwin’s Doubt. New York: HarperOne.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. (2017). Neo-Darwinism and the origin of biological form and information. In: Theistic Evolution: A Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Critique, Moreland, J. P., Meyer, S. C., Shaw, C., Gauger, A. K., and Grudem, W., eds. Wheaton: Crossway.Google Scholar
Miller, K. (2007). Falling over the edge. Nature. 447(7148): 1055–1056.Google Scholar
Moorhead, P. S. and Kaplan, M. M., eds. (1967). Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute Press.Google Scholar
Moran, L. (2020). Of mice and Michael. Online at: https://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2020/12/of-mice-and-michael.html. Accessed December 2021.Google Scholar
Morris, H. M. and Parker, G. E. (1987). What Is Creation Science? (Revised and Expanded Edition). El Cajon: Master Books.Google Scholar
Morris, H. M. (1982). The Troubled Waters of Evolution, 2nd ed. San Diego: Creation-Life Publishers.Google Scholar
Muller, H. (1918). Genetic variability, twin hybrids and constant hybrids in a case of balanced lethal factors. Genetics. 3(5): 422–499.Google Scholar
Musgrave, I. (2004). Evolution of the bacterial flagellum. In: Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism. Young, M. and Edis, T., eds. pp. 72–84.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A. (2006). Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life. Cambridge: Belknap/Harvard.Google Scholar
Numbers, R. (2006). The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design. Expanded ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oerter, R. (2006). Does life on earth violate the second law of thermodynamics? Online at http://physics.gmu.edu/~roerter/EvolutionEntropy.htm Accessed December 2021.Google Scholar
Olofsson, P. (2008). Intelligent design and mathematical statistics: A troubled alliance. Biology and Philosophy. 23(4): 545–553.Google Scholar
Olofsson, P. (2013). Probability, statistics, evolution, and intelligent design. Chance. 21(3): 42–45.Google Scholar
Orgel, L. (1973). The Origins of Life: Molecules and Natural Selection. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Paley, W. (2006). Natural Theology. Oxford World Classics reprint edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, J. R. (1961). An Introduction to Information Theory: Symbols, Signals, and Noise. Mineola: Dover.Google Scholar
Pieret, J. (2006). The Quote Mine Project, or Lies, Damned Lies and Quote Mines. Online at www.talkorigins.org/faqs/quotes/mine/project.html. Last accessed December 2021.Google Scholar
Pigliucci, M. and Müller, G. (2010), eds. Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R. (2007). Evolution: What the Fossils Say and Why it Matters. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R. (2020). The Story of Evolution in 25 Discoveries: The Evidence and the People Who Found it. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Purdom, G. (2008). Evidence of new genetic information? Online at https://answersingenesis.org/genetics/mutations/evidence-of-new-genetric-information. Last accessed December 2021.Google Scholar
Rogers, A. R. (2011). The Evidence for Evolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenhouse, J. (2002a). Rhetorical legerdemain in intelligent design literature. In Darwin Day: Collection One, Chesworth, A., Hill, S., Lipovsky, K., Snyder, E., and Chesworth, W., eds. Albuquerque: Tangled Bank Press. 327–338.Google Scholar
Rosenhouse, J. (2002b). Probability, information theory, and evolution. Evolution. 56(8): 1721–1722.Google Scholar
Rosenhouse, J. (2005). Why scientists get so angry when dealing with ID proponents. Skeptical Inquirer. 29(6): 42–45.Google Scholar
Rosenhouse, J. (2011). Among the Creationists: Dispatches From the Anti-Evolutionist Front Line. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenhouse, J. (2016). On mathematical anti-evolutionism. Science and Education. 25(1): 95–114.Google Scholar
Rosenhouse, J. (2017). Thermodynamical arguments against evolution. Science and Education. 26(1): 3–25.Google Scholar
Rosenhouse, J. (2018). Reviews of Undeniable: How Biology Confirms that Life Is Designed by D. Axe, Introduction to Evolutionary Informatics, by R. J. Marks II, W. A. Dembski, and W. Ewert, and Proving Darwin: Making Biology Mathematical, by G. Chaitin. American Mathematical Monthly. 125(6): 571–576.Google Scholar
Roth, A. A. (1998). Origins: Linking Science and Scripture. Silver Spring: Review and Herald Publishing Association.Google Scholar
Salsburg, D. (2001). The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S. (2007). Doubting Darwin?: Creationist Designs on Evolution. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. and Sagan, D. (2005). Into the Cool: Energy Flow, Thermodynamics, and Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schwab, I. R. (2012). Evolution’s Witness: How Eyes Evolved. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, E. C. (2009). Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, G. (2013a). Entropy, evolution, and open systems. In: Biological Information: New Perspectives. Marks II, R. J., Behe, M. J., Dembski, W. A., Gordon, B. L., and Sanford, J. C., eds. Singapore: World Scientific. 168–178.Google Scholar
Sewell, G. (2013b). Entropy and evolution. BIO-Complexity. 3: 1–5.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal. 27(3): 379–423.Google Scholar
Shubin, N. (2020). Some Assembly Required: Decoding Four Billion Years of Life, from Ancient Fossils to DNA. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (2002). Intelligent design and probability reasoning. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 52(1): 65–80.Google Scholar
Stearns, S. C. (2020). Frontiers in molecular evolutionary medicine. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 88(1): 3–11.Google Scholar
Styer, D. (2008). Evolution and entropy. American Journal of Physics. 76(11): 1031–1033.Google Scholar
Szathmáry, E. and Maynard Smith, J. (1995). The major evolutionary transitions. Nature. 374(6519): 227–232.Google Scholar
Takagi, Y. A., Nguyen, D. H., Wexler, T. B., and Goldman, A. D. (2020). The coevolution of cellularity and metabolism following the origin of life. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 88(7): 598–617.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (2015). Body by Darwin: How Evolution Shapes Our Health and Transforms Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. and Raes, J. (2004). Duplication and divergence: The evolution of new genes and old ideas. Annual Review of Genetics. 38: 615–643.Google Scholar
Theobald, D. (2012). 29+ evidences for macroevolution: The case for common descent. Online at www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/. Last accessed December 2021.Google Scholar
Thorvaldsen, S. and Hössjer, O. (2020). Using statistical methods to model the finetuning of molecular machines and systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 507: 1–14.Google Scholar
Ulam, S. (1972). Some ideas and prospects in biomathematics. Annual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering. 1: 277–292.Google Scholar
Van Ness, H. C. (1969). Understanding Thermodynamics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Wein, R. (2002). Not a free lunch, but a box of chocolates. Online at: www.talkorigins.org/design/faqs/nfl/. Last accessed December 2021.Google Scholar
Whitcomb Jr., J. and Morris, H. (1961). The Genesis Flood: The biblical Record and Its Scientific Implications. Phillipsburg: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Williams, W. A. (1928). The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved, in 50 Arguments. Camden: W. A. Williams.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. (1996). Introduction to Graph Theory, 4th ed. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. H. (2002). William Dembski’s treatment of the No Free Lunch theorems is written in jello. Mathematical Reviews, Feb. 2003. Available online at www.talkreason.org/articles/jello.cfm. Accessed December 2021.Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. H. and Macready, W. G. (1997). No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 1(1): 67–82.Google Scholar
Yeates, T. O. (2007). Protein structure: Evolutionary bridges to new folds. Current Biology. 17(2): R48–R50.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jason Rosenhouse, James Madison University, Virginia
  • Book: The Failures of Mathematical Anti-Evolutionism
  • Online publication: 28 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108907149.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jason Rosenhouse, James Madison University, Virginia
  • Book: The Failures of Mathematical Anti-Evolutionism
  • Online publication: 28 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108907149.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jason Rosenhouse, James Madison University, Virginia
  • Book: The Failures of Mathematical Anti-Evolutionism
  • Online publication: 28 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108907149.010
Available formats
×