Book contents
- Feminist Judgments: Corporate Law Rewritten
- Feminist Judgments Series Editors
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Corporate Law Rewritten
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Corporate Law Rewritten
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- About the Cover Art
- Table of Cases
- Part I Introduction and Overview
- Part II Legal Personality, Identity, and Limited Liability of Corporate Entities
- Part III Role and Purpose of the Corporation and Corporate Combinations in Society
- 4 Commentary on Dodge v. Ford Motor Company
- 5 Commentary on Merriam v. Demoulas Super Mkts.
- 6 Commentary on Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.
- 7 Commentary on Agreement between Harvey Weinstein and The Weinstein Company Holdings LLC, as of October 20, 2015
- Part IV Fiduciary Duties in Corporate Governance
- Part V Closely Held Businesses and Other Considerations Regarding the Composition of Boards, Management, and Owners
- Part VI Protecting Investors and Potential Investors in Corporations
- Part VII From Foundations to Future Directions
- Index
4 - Commentary on Dodge v. Ford Motor Company
from Part III - Role and Purpose of the Corporation and Corporate Combinations in Society
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 January 2023
- Feminist Judgments: Corporate Law Rewritten
- Feminist Judgments Series Editors
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Corporate Law Rewritten
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Corporate Law Rewritten
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- About the Cover Art
- Table of Cases
- Part I Introduction and Overview
- Part II Legal Personality, Identity, and Limited Liability of Corporate Entities
- Part III Role and Purpose of the Corporation and Corporate Combinations in Society
- 4 Commentary on Dodge v. Ford Motor Company
- 5 Commentary on Merriam v. Demoulas Super Mkts.
- 6 Commentary on Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.
- 7 Commentary on Agreement between Harvey Weinstein and The Weinstein Company Holdings LLC, as of October 20, 2015
- Part IV Fiduciary Duties in Corporate Governance
- Part V Closely Held Businesses and Other Considerations Regarding the Composition of Boards, Management, and Owners
- Part VI Protecting Investors and Potential Investors in Corporations
- Part VII From Foundations to Future Directions
- Index
Summary
The plaintiffs, John and Horace Dodge, owned a ten percent share in the defendant’s, Ford Motor Company (FMC), corporation. The Dodge brothers had recently started their own car company, but the Dodge Brothers retained interest in FMC, which had paid hefty dividends. Henry Ford very publicly decided to stop paying dividends to investors and to build a new plant in River Rouge, Michigan, which would drive competition for lower priced vehicles. The Dodge brothers filed this suit in response. The case highlights the debate over the fundamental purpose of business: investor benefit or societal benefit. Through the lens of feminist theory, Ford’s approach would promote both the financial interests of FMC and the equitable access to private transportation to the betterment of society. By withholding dividends, FMC could maintain a cash reserve in times of financial adversity; meanwhile, by driving down the price of cars, private transportation could be more widely available to even the most marginalized groups who were more likely to experience harassment on public transportation. The feminist perspective argues that the notion that a corporation’s only purpose being to immediately maximize profits for the sake of stockholders is too narrow a view.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feminist Judgments: Corporate Law Rewritten , pp. 91 - 110Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023