Book contents
- Feminist Judgments: Family Law Opinions Rewritten
- Feminist Judgments Series Editors
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Family Law Opinions Rewritten
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Family Law Opinions Rewritten
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Commentary on Reynolds v. United States
- 3 Commentary on McGuire v. McGuire
- 4 Commentary on Dandridge v. Williams
- 5 Commentary on Wisconsin v. Yoder
- 6 Commentary on Marvin v. Marvin
- 7 Commentary on Kulko v. Superior Court of California
- 8 Commentary on Daly v. Daly
- 9 Commentary on Michael H. v. Gerald D.
- 10 Commentary on DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services
- 11 Commentary on Simeone v. Simeone
- 12 Commentary on Borelli v. Brusseau
- 13 Commentary on Turner v. Rogers
- 14 Commentary on In the Matter of the Parentage of a Child by T.J.S. and A.L.S.
- 15 Commentary on Matter of A-B-
- 16 Commentary on Sessions v. Morales-Santana
- Index
14 - Commentary on In the Matter of the Parentage of a Child by T.J.S. and A.L.S.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 July 2020
- Feminist Judgments: Family Law Opinions Rewritten
- Feminist Judgments Series Editors
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Family Law Opinions Rewritten
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Family Law Opinions Rewritten
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Commentary on Reynolds v. United States
- 3 Commentary on McGuire v. McGuire
- 4 Commentary on Dandridge v. Williams
- 5 Commentary on Wisconsin v. Yoder
- 6 Commentary on Marvin v. Marvin
- 7 Commentary on Kulko v. Superior Court of California
- 8 Commentary on Daly v. Daly
- 9 Commentary on Michael H. v. Gerald D.
- 10 Commentary on DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services
- 11 Commentary on Simeone v. Simeone
- 12 Commentary on Borelli v. Brusseau
- 13 Commentary on Turner v. Rogers
- 14 Commentary on In the Matter of the Parentage of a Child by T.J.S. and A.L.S.
- 15 Commentary on Matter of A-B-
- 16 Commentary on Sessions v. Morales-Santana
- Index
Summary
In 1988, the New Jersey Supreme Court case In re Baby M. gripped the nation.1 A married couple contracted to pay $10,000 to a woman who agreed to be inseminated with the sperm of the husband and, following a successful pregnancy, surrender to their custody the resulting baby. Shortly after the baby’s birth, however, the surrogate absconded with baby – for whom she was both the genetic and birth mother – and sued to declare the surrogacy contract void. The New Jersey Supreme Court held that the paid surrogacy contract was unenforceable and refused to terminate the surrogate’s rights. The court vested custody in the husband-father and, by default, his wife, however.2
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feminist Judgments: Family Law Opinions Rewritten , pp. 332 - 359Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020