Book contents
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Feminist Judgments Series
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction and Overview
- Part I Gendered Justice
- Part II Gender on Trial
- 9 Commentary on State v. Williams
- 10 Commentary on State v. Walden
- 11 Commentary on State v. Norman
- 12 Commentary on Whitner v. State
- 13 Commentary on United States v. Nwoye
- 14 Commentary on Erotic Services Provider Legal Education and Research Project v. Gascon
10 - Commentary on State v. Walden
from Part II - Gender on Trial
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2022
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Feminist Judgments Series
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction and Overview
- Part I Gendered Justice
- Part II Gender on Trial
- 9 Commentary on State v. Williams
- 10 Commentary on State v. Walden
- 11 Commentary on State v. Norman
- 12 Commentary on Whitner v. State
- 13 Commentary on United States v. Nwoye
- 14 Commentary on Erotic Services Provider Legal Education and Research Project v. Gascon
Summary
This opinion held that a viable fetus was a “child” under the state’s criminal child endangerment statute. The defendant was accused of using illegal drugs during her pregnancy and the South Carolina Supreme Court held that her alleged drug use could serve as the basis for a child endangerment charge. This opinion is cited as severely eroding the reproductive rights and bodily autonomy of women.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions , pp. 214 - 229Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022