Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:53:55.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Fetal therapy choices

About risks, emotions, and the doctor’s role in the decision-making process

from Section 1 - General principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

By
Danielle R. M. Timmermans
Edited by
Mark D. Kilby ,
Anthony Johnson  and
Dick Oepkes
Mark D. Kilby
Affiliation:
Department of Fetal Medicine, University of Birmingham
Anthony Johnson
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas
Dick Oepkes
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Making good decisions prospectively is difficult. Especially when it is the perception that the stakes are high. There is often uncertainty regarding prognosis and emotions prevail both between a couple and in the interactions with their healthcare professional team. This is the case when parents have to decide about fetal therapy for congenital malformations and the health of their unborn child. Parents usually are unprepared for the often rare disease the fetus is found to have. Still in a state of shock, they receive a lot of detailed and difficult information, and need to decide on whether or not to choose the option of fetal therapy (which often carries risks of perinatal death or preterm birth as complications), expectant management, or sometimes the very difficult option of termination of pregnancy. The obstetrician or fetal medicine specialist aims to provide the parents with all the relevant factual information and to support them in their decision process.

How do parents make these decisions? Are they able to process and understand this information? Do they comprehend the communicated risks and how do they incorporate the risks into their decision-making? How do emotions affect their decision-making? What is the role of physicians in facilitating this process and how can they guide the parents in this difficult decision-making process? How should they provide information about the malformations and the pros and cons of the different treatment options? These are the questions that are dealt with in this chapter. A better understanding of the decision process and parents and the role of physicians in facilitating this process is a prerequisite for being able to improve the quality of care in this respect.

Keywords

fetal therapyfetal lung anomaliesrisk informationemotional statedecision-making processdoctor's support
Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal Therapy
Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits
 , pp. 45 - 54
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shapiro, DE, Boggs, SR, Melamed, BG, Graham-Pole, J. The effect of varied physician affect on recall, anxiety, and perceptions in women at risk for breast cancer: an analogue study. Health Psychol 1992;11:61–6.Google Scholar
Kessels, PC. Patients’ memory for medical information. J R Soc Med 2003;96:219–22.Google Scholar
Baron, J. Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Marois, R, Ivanoff, J. Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2005;9:296–305.Google Scholar
Miller, GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 1956;63:81–97.Google Scholar
Simon, H. Rational decision making in business organizations. Am Econ Rev 1979;69:493–513.Google Scholar
Timmermans, DRM. Bounded rationality and emotions. In: Kattan, MW, ed. Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Making. London: Sage Publications. 2009; 98–101.
(accessed September 2012).
Williams, MV, Davis, T, Parker, RM, Weiss, BD. The role of health literacy in patient-physician communication. Fam Med 2002;34:383–9.Google Scholar
Peters, E, Västfjäll, D, Slovic, P, et al. Numeracy and decision making. Psychol Sci 2006;17:407–13.Google Scholar
Tiedens, LZ, Linton, S. Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001;81:973–88.Google Scholar
Evans, JS. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 2008;59:255–78.Google Scholar
Gilovich, T, Griffin, D, Kahneman, D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Schwartz, N, Clore, GL. Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychol Inquiry 2003;14:296–303.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G, Lerner, JS. The role of affect in decision making. In: Davidson, RJ, Scherer, KR, Goldsmith, HH, eds. Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford, New York. Oxford University Press. 2003; 619–42.
Van den Berg, M, Timmermans, DRM, Knol, D, et al. Understanding pregnant women’s decision making concerning prenatal screening. Health Psychol 2008;27:430–7.Google Scholar
Lippman-Hand, A, Fraser, FC. Genetic counseling: provision and reception of information. Am J Med Genet 1979;3:113–27.Google Scholar
Wang, XT. Emotions with reason: resolving conflicts in risk preference. Cogn Emotion 2006;20:1132–52.Google Scholar
Godolphin, W. Shared decision making. Healthc Q 2009;12(Sp):e186–e90. .Google Scholar
Edwards, A. Elwyn, G, eds. Shared Decision Making in Health Care, 2nd edn. Oxford, England, Oxford University Press, 2009.
Charles, C, Gafni, A, Whelan, T. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:651–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elwyn, G, Laitner, S, Coulter, A, et al. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ 2010;341:c5146.Google Scholar
Elwyn, G, Edwards, A, Britten, N. “Doing prescribing”: how doctors can be more effective. BMJ 2003;327:864–7.Google Scholar
(accessed September 2012).
(accessed September 2012).
O’Connor, A, Bennett, C, Stacey, D, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;3:CD001431.Google Scholar
Timmermans, DRM, Oudhoff, J. Different formats for the communication of risks: verbal, numerical, and graphical formats. In: Cochran, JJ ed. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons. 2010; DOI: .
Timmermans, DRM. The role of experience and domain of expertise in using numerical and verbal probability terms in medical decisions. Med Decis Making 1994;14:146–56.Google Scholar
Gurmankin, AD, Baron, J, Armstrong, K. The effect of numerical statements of risk on trust and comfort with hypothetical physician risk communication. Med Decis Making 2004;24:265–71.Google Scholar
Wallsten, TS, Budescu, DV, Zwick, R, Kemp, SM. Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in verbal or numerical terms. Bull Psychon Soc 1993;31:135–8.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G, Gassmaier, W, Kurz-Milke, E et al. Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2007;8:53–96.Google Scholar
Slovic, P, Monahan, J, MacGregor, DG. Violence risk assessment and risk communication: the effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law Hum Behav 2000;24:271–96.Google Scholar
Lipkus, IM. Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Med Decis Making 2007;27:696–713.Google Scholar
Timmermans, D, Molewijk, B, Stiggelbout, A, et al. Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatment. Patient Educ Couns 2004;54:255–63.Google Scholar
Galesic, M, Garcia-Retamero, R, Gigerenzer, G. Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy. Health Psychol 2009;28:210–16.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, B, Slovic, P, Lichtenstein, S. Knowing what you want: measuring labile values. In: Wallsten, TS, ed. Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1980; 117–41.
Montgomery, AA, Fahey, T. How do patients’ treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians? Qual Health Care 2001;10(Suppl I):i39–43.Google Scholar
Stiggelbout, AM, De Haes, JCJM. Patient preference for cancer therapy: an overview of measurement approaches. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:220–30.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. Strangers to Ourselves. Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2002.
Robinson, A, Thomson, R. Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Health Care 2001;10(Suppl I):i34–8.Google Scholar
Gibb, A, Entwistle, V. Shared decision making: trade-offs between narrower and broader conceptions. Health Expectations 2011;14:210–19.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, A. On making the right choice: the deliberation without attention effect. Science 2006; 311:1005–7.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×