Book contents
- Field and Laboratory Methods in Animal Cognition
- Field and Laboratory Methods in Animal Cognition
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction. The Concept of Umwelt in Experimental Animal Cognition
- 1 Ants – Individual and Social Cognition
- 2 Bats – Using Sound to Reveal Cognition
- 3 Bees – The Experimental Umwelt of Honeybees
- 4 Carib Grackles – Field and Lab Work on a Tame, Opportunistic Island Icterid
- 5 Chicken – Cognition in the Poultry Yard
- 6 Chimpanzees – Investigating Cognition in the Wild
- 7 Dolphins and Whales – Taking Cognitive Research Out of the Tanks and into the Wild
- 8 Elephants – Studying Cognition in the African Savannah
- 9 Fish – How to Ask Them the Right Questions
- 10 Hermit Crabs – Information Gathering by the Hermit Crab, Pagurus bernhardus
- 11 Hyenas – Testing Cognition in the Umwelt of the Spotted Hyena
- 12 Lizards – Measuring Cognition: Practical Challenges and the Influence of Ecology and Social Behaviour
- 13 Meerkats – Identifying Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Meerkat Coordination and Communication: Experimental Designs in Their Natural Habitat
- 14 Octopuses – Mind in the Waters
- 15 Grey Parrots (Psittacus erithacus) – Cognitive and Communicative Abilities
- 16 Sharks – Elasmobranch Cognition
- 17 Spiders – Hints for Testing Cognition and Learning in Jumping Spiders
- 18 Tortoises – Cold-Blooded Cognition: How to Get a Tortoise Out of Its Shell
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
4 - Carib Grackles – Field and Lab Work on a Tame, Opportunistic Island Icterid
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2018
Book contents
- Field and Laboratory Methods in Animal Cognition
- Field and Laboratory Methods in Animal Cognition
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction. The Concept of Umwelt in Experimental Animal Cognition
- 1 Ants – Individual and Social Cognition
- 2 Bats – Using Sound to Reveal Cognition
- 3 Bees – The Experimental Umwelt of Honeybees
- 4 Carib Grackles – Field and Lab Work on a Tame, Opportunistic Island Icterid
- 5 Chicken – Cognition in the Poultry Yard
- 6 Chimpanzees – Investigating Cognition in the Wild
- 7 Dolphins and Whales – Taking Cognitive Research Out of the Tanks and into the Wild
- 8 Elephants – Studying Cognition in the African Savannah
- 9 Fish – How to Ask Them the Right Questions
- 10 Hermit Crabs – Information Gathering by the Hermit Crab, Pagurus bernhardus
- 11 Hyenas – Testing Cognition in the Umwelt of the Spotted Hyena
- 12 Lizards – Measuring Cognition: Practical Challenges and the Influence of Ecology and Social Behaviour
- 13 Meerkats – Identifying Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Meerkat Coordination and Communication: Experimental Designs in Their Natural Habitat
- 14 Octopuses – Mind in the Waters
- 15 Grey Parrots (Psittacus erithacus) – Cognitive and Communicative Abilities
- 16 Sharks – Elasmobranch Cognition
- 17 Spiders – Hints for Testing Cognition and Learning in Jumping Spiders
- 18 Tortoises – Cold-Blooded Cognition: How to Get a Tortoise Out of Its Shell
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
Summary
The Carib grackle is a blackbird from the family Icteridae, one of the avian families showing the highest level of innovativeness in the wild. This grackle is particularly successful in the highly anthropogenically-modified environment of Barbados, exploiting a range of food sources made available by humans. The behaviour and cognition of this species has been investigated for more than 20 years, through direct experimentation in nature and behavioural tests conducted on birds kept captive for a few weeks. Particularly tame and exploratory in the field, and habituating very quickly to captivity, the grackle has proven to be a model species to characterize inter-individual variation in cognition. Here we describe the challenges associated with the measurement of cognition in wild birds, and detail the methodological solutions developed to deal with these challenges in the Carib grackle. From habituation protocols to measurements of temperament and novel cognitive tasks, we outline some of the constraints, difficulties and advantages surrounding the study of this species’ cognition in the field. Finally, we provide technical and methodological advice on field conditions, experimental set-ups and maintenance of birds in captivity for short periods.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Field and Laboratory Methods in Animal CognitionA Comparative Guide, pp. 76 - 96Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Cavagna, A., Cimarelli, A., Giardina, I., et al. (2010). Scale-free correlations in startling flocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 11865–11870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, S., Mason, W., and Watts, D. J. (2010). Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 611–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoppitt, W., and Laland, K. N. (2011). Social learning: an introduction to mechanisms, methods, and models. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. A., Giraldeau, L. A., and Grant, J. W. A. (2001). The effect of handling time on interference among house sparrows foraging at different seed densities. Behaviour, 138, 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, J., and Ruxton, G. D. (2002). Living in groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, J., James, R., Franks, D. W., and Croft, D. P. (2015). Animal social networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lima, S. L. (1995). Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group size effect. Animal Behavior, 49, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, M., Ákos, Z., Biro, D., and Vicsek, T. (2010). Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks. Nature, 464, 890–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, C. R., MacDonald, H., Mann, R. P., Marshall, J. A. R., Latty, T., and Garnier, S. (2016). Decision-making without a brain: how an amoeboid organism solves the two-armed bandit. Interface, 13, 20160030.Google ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, S. B., Twomey, C. R., Hartnett, A. T., Wu, H. S., and Couzin, I. D. (2015). Revealing the hidden networks of interaction in mobile animal groups allows prediction of complex behavioral contagion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 4690–4695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2006). The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 361, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Aplin, L. M., Farine, D. R., Morand-Ferron, J., Cockburn, A., Thornton, A., and Sheldon, B. C. (2015). Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds. Nature, 518, 538–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, E. F., Cram, D. L., and Quinn, J. L. (2011). Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits. Animal Behaviour, 81, 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, E. F., Morand-Ferron, J., Hinks, A. E., and Quinn, J. L. (2012). Cognitive ability influences reproductive life history variation in the wild. Current Biology, 22, 1808–1812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ducatez, S., Audet, J. N., and Lefebvre, L. (2015). Problem-solving and learning in Carib grackles: individuals show a consistent speed-accuracy trade-off. Animal Cognition, 18, 495–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morand-Ferron, J., and Quinn, J. L. (2011). Larger groups of passerines are more efficient problem solvers in the wild. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 15898–15903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morand-Ferron, J., Cole, E. F., Rawles, J. E. C., and Quinn, J. L. (2011). Who are the innovators? A field experiment with 2 passerine species. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 1241–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morand-Ferron, J., Hamblin, S., Cole, E. F., Aplin, L. M., and Quinn, J. L. (2015). Taking the operant paradigm into the field: associative learning in wild great tits. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0133821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ten Cate, C., and Healy, S. D. (2017) Avian cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Audet, J. N., Kayello, L., Ducatez, S., Perillo, S., et al. (2018). Divergence in problem-solving skills is associated with differential expression of glutamate receptors in wild finches. Science Advances, 4, eaa063669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Audet, J. N., and Lefebvre, L. (2017). What’s flexible in behavioral flexibility? Behavioral Ecology, 28, 943–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audet, J. N., Ducatez, S., and Lefebvre, L. (2016). Bajan birds pull strings: two wild Antillean species enter the select club of string-pullers. PLoS ONE, 11, e0156112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biard, C., Monceau, K., Motreuil, S., and Moreau, J. (2015). Interpreting immunological indices: the importance of taking parasite community into account. An example in blackbirds Turdus merula. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 960–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boogert, N. J., Monceau, K., and Lefebvre, L. (2010). A field test of behavioural flexibility in Zenaida doves (Zenaida aurita). Behavioural Processes, 85, 135–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bortolotti, G. R., Marchant, T. A., Blas, J., and German, T. (2008). Corticosterone in feathers is a long-term, integrated measure of avian stress physiology. Functional Ecology, 22, 494–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. A., Massiah, E. B., Hutt, M. B., Buckley, F. G., and Hutt, H. F. (2009). The birds of Barbados. BOU Checklist Series, 24. Retrieved from www.bou.org.uk/barbados-sample.pdf.Google Scholar
Bugnyar, T., and Heinrich, B. (2005). Ravens, Corvus corax, differentiate between knowledgeable and ignorant competitors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 1641–1646.Google ScholarPubMed
Clayton, N. S., Dally, J. M., and Emery, N. J. (2007). Social cognition by food-caching corvids. The western scrub-jay as a natural psychologist. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 507–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Debrot, A. O. (2014). Nocturnal foraging by artificial light in three Caribbean bird species. The Journal of Caribbean Ornithology, 27, 40–41.Google Scholar
Dolman, C. S., Templeton, J., and Lefebvre, L. (1996). Mode of foraging competition is related to tutor preference in Zenaida aurita. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ducatez, S., Audet, J. N., and Lefebvre, L. (2015). Problem-solving and learning in Carib grackles: individuals show a consistent speed–accuracy trade-off. Animal Cognition, 18, 485–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ducatez, S., Audet, J.-N., Rodriguez, J. R., Kayello, L., and Lefebvre, L. (2017). Innovativeness and the effects of urbanization on risk-taking behaviors in wild Barbados birds. Animal Cognition, 20, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraga, R. (2017). Carib grackle (Quiscalus lugubris). In: Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.Google Scholar
Greenberg, R. (2003). The role of neophobia and neophilia in the development of innovative behaviour of birds. In Animal innovation (pp. 175–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, A. S. (2008). Socially acquired predator avoidance: is it just classical conditioning? Brain Research Bulletin, 76, 264–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, A. S., and Galef, B. G. (2005). Social learning about predators: does timing matter? Animal Behaviour, 69, 669–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, A. S., Savani, R. S., Hausmanis, K., and Lefebvre, L. (2005). Mixed-species aggregations in birds: Zenaida doves, Zenaida aurita, respond to the alarm calls of Carib grackles, Quiscalus lugubris. Animal Behaviour, 70, 507–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, A. S., Diquelou, M., and Perea, M. (2014). Innovative problem solving in birds: a key role of motor diversity. Animal Behaviour, 92, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, T. C. (1989). Ptilochronology: feather growth bars as indicators of nutritional status. The Auk, 106, 314–320.Google Scholar
Huber, L., and Gajdon, G. K. (2006). Technical intelligence in animals: the kea model. Animal Cognition, 9, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwaniuk, A. N. (2003). The evolution of brain size and structure in birds. Clayton: Monash University.Google Scholar
Keeler, J. E. (1963). Common grackles catching live shad. Alabama Birdlife, 11, 23–24.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. F. (2000). Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in the study of avian and mammalian trophic ecology. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Templeton, J., Brown, K., and Koelle, M. (1997). Carib grackles imitate conspecific and Zenaida dove tutors. Behaviour, 134, 1003–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Ducatez, S., and Audet, J. N. (2016). Feeding innovations in a nested phylogeny of Neotropical passerines. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovette, I. J., Seutin, G., Ricklefs, R. E., and Bermingham, E. (1999). The assembly of an island fauna by natural invasion: sources and temporal patterns in the avian colonization of Barbados. Biological Invasions, 1, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, W. P., and Maddison, D. R. (2008). Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.75. Available at http://mesquiteproject.org.Google Scholar
McNeil, R., McSween, A., and Lachapelle, P. (2005). Comparison of the retinal structure and function in four bird species as a function of the time they start singing in the morning. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 65, 202–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morand-Ferron, J., and Lefebvre, L. (2007). Flexible expression of a food-processing behaviour: determinants of dunking rates in wild Carib grackles of Barbados. Behavioural Processes, 76, 218–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morand-Ferron, J., Lefebvre, L., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., and Elvin, S. (2004). Dunking behaviour in Carib grackles. Animal Behaviour, 68, 1267–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morand-Ferron, J., Veillette, M., and Lefebvre, L. (2006). Stealing of dunked food in Carib grackles (Quiscalus lugubris). Behavioural Processes, 73, 342–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morand-Ferron, J., Giraldeau, L. A., and Lefebvre, L. (2007). Wild Carib grackles play a producer–scrounger game. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 916–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overington, S. E., Morand-Ferron, J., Boogert, N. J., and Lefebvre, L. (2009a). Technical innovations drive the relationship between innovativeness and residual brain size in birds. Animal Behaviour, 78, 1001–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overington, S. E., Cauchard, L., Morand-Ferron, J., and Lefebvre, L. (2009b). Innovation in groups: does the proximity of others facilitate or inhibit performance? Behaviour, 146, 1543–1564.Google Scholar
Overington, S. E., Wattier, R., Côté, K.-A., Cauchard, L., and Lefebvre, L. (2010). Behavioural, biometric and molecular sexing of Quiscalus lugubris fortirostris in Barbados. Behavioural innovation and the evolution of cognition in birds (pp. 262–276). PhD thesis, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.Google Scholar
Overington, S. E., Cauchard, L., Côté, K. A., and Lefebvre, L. (2011). Innovative foraging behaviour in birds: what characterizes an innovator? Behavioural Processes, 87, 274–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peig, J., and Green, A. J. (2009). New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos, 118, 1883–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peig, J., and Green, A. J. (2010). The paradigm of body condition: a critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length. Functional Ecology, 24, 1323–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. F. L. A., Barker, F. K., Lanyon, S. M., Burns, K. J., Klicka, J., and Lovette, I. J. (2014). A comprehensive species-level molecular phylogeny of the New World blackbirds (Icteridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 71, 94–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reader, S. M., Morand-Ferron, J., Côté, I., and Lefebvre, L. (2002). Unusual feeding behaviors in five species of Barbadian birds. El Pitirre, 15, 117–123.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Ferraro, A. (2015). Fishing behavior of the Carib grackle (Quiscalus lugubris) in Venezuela. Ornitologia Neotropical, 26, 207–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sol, D., Sayol, F., Ducatez, S., and Lefebvre, L. (2016). The life-history basis of behavioural innovations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, S. J., and Lefebvre, L. (2001). Problem solving and neophobia in a columbiform–passeriform assemblage in Barbados. Animal Behaviour, 62, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunderle, J. M. (1981). Avian predation upon Anolis lizards on Grenada, West Indies. Herpetologica, 37, 104–108.Google Scholar