Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:21:53.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Chastening the future

What we learn from others’ regret

from Part IV - Applications of affective social learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2019

Daniel Dukes
Affiliation:
Université de Fribourg, Switzerland
Fabrice Clément
Affiliation:
Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

In this chapter we discuss the ways in which expressions of regret provide “lessons” for observers of those expressions, thereby constituting a case of affective social learning. We review three lines of research to argue that another person’s regret tells us something about the aversive consequences of a decision made by that person and influences our own behaviour when we have to make a similar decision. In the first line of research we found that participants who had seen another person acting unfairly but then expressing regret – as opposed to pride – were more likely to anticipate regret if they were to act the same way, and this anticipated emotion affected the likelihood of participants themselves acting fairly. This “lesson” learned by witnessing another person’s regret can also be extended to relations between groups. In the second line of research, observers appeared to “learn” from an out-group’s expression of regret that members of the out-group were unhappy about the decision they took, which encourages the observers to see the out-group as more trustworthy. In the third line of research, we show that similar effects are found when an in-group member expresses regret about the in-group’s failure to reciprocate the trust shown by an out-group. Thus, expressing regret serves the function of communicating the inappropriateness of the in-group’s decision and thereby encourages trusting behaviour in other in-group members. Our contention is that the effects of emotional expression in the experiments described here are due to shifts in the perceived appropriateness of certain behaviours, shifts that result from a process of affective social learning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Foundations of Affective Social Learning
Conceptualizing the Social Transmission of Value
, pp. 187 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In Kuhl, J. & Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behaviour (pp. 1139). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balliet, D., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 10901112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 167203.Google Scholar
Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122142.Google Scholar
Berndsen, M., van der Pligt, J., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). Guilt and regret: The determining role of interpersonal and intrapersonal harm. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 5570.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429444.Google Scholar
Bruder, M., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2014). Social appraisal as a cause of collective emotions. In von Scheve, C. & Salmela, M. (Eds.), Collective emotions (pp. 141155). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canessa, N., Motterlini, M., Alemanno, F., Perani, D., & Cappa, S. (2011). Learning from other people’s experience: A neuroimaging study of decisional interactive-learning. Neuroimage, 55(1), 353362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Melo, C. M., Carnevale, P. J., Read, S. J., & Gratch, J. (2014). Reading people’s minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 7388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, C. N. (Ed.) (1917). Forty thousand quotations: Prose and poetical. New York, NY: Halcyon House.Google Scholar
Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Mollerstrom, J., & Munkhammar, S. (2012). Social framing effects: Preferences or beliefs? Games and Economic Behavior, 76, 117130.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 367388.Google Scholar
Hareli, S., & Hess, U. (2010). What emotional reactions can tell us about the nature of others: An appraisal perspective on person perception. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 128140.Google Scholar
Insko, C., Schopler, J., Hoyle, R., Dardis, G., & Graetz, K. A. (1990). Individual-group discontinuity as a function of fear and greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 6879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59, S285S300.Google Scholar
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 215221.Google Scholar
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92, 805825.Google Scholar
Mansfield, K. (1920). Je ne parle pas français. In Bliss and other stories (pp. 71115). Plymouth, UK: Mayflower Press.Google Scholar
Manstead, A. S. R., & Fischer, A. H. (2001). Social appraisal: The social world as object of and influence on appraisal processes. In Scherer, K., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 221232). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 321336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mumenthaler, C., & Sander, D. (2012). Social appraisal influences recognition of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 11181135.Google Scholar
Parkinson, D., & Simons, G. (2009). Affecting others: Social appraisal and emotion contagion in everyday decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 10711084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richard, R., van der Pligt, J., & de Vries, N. (1996). Anticipated regret and time perspective: Changing sexual risk-taking behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 185199.Google Scholar
Rychlowska, M., van der Schalk, J., Gratch, J., Breitinger, E., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2019). Beyond actions: Reparatory effects of regret in intergroup trust games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 7484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.006Google Scholar
Sandberg, T., & Conner, M. (2008). Anticipated regret as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 589606.Google Scholar
Shimanoff, S. B. (1984). Commonly named emotions in everyday conversations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 514.Google Scholar
Shore, D., & Parkinson, B. (2017). Interpersonal effects of strategic and spontaneous guilt communication in trust games. Cognition and Emotion, 32(6), 1382–1390. doi:10.1080/02699931.2017.1395728Google Scholar
Shore, D., Rychlowska, M., van der Schalk, J., Parkinson, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2018). Intergroup emotional exchange: Ingroup guilt and outgroup anger increase resource allocation in trust games. Emotion, 19(4), 605–616. doi: 10.1037/emo0000463Google Scholar
Sorce, J. F., Emde, R. N., Campos, J., & Klinnert, M. D. (1985). Maternal emotional signaling: Its effect on the visual cliff behavior of 1-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 21, 195200.Google Scholar
van der Schalk, J., Kuppens, T., Bruder, M., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2015). The social power of regret: The effect of social appraisal and anticipated emotions on fair and unfair allocations in resource dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 151157.Google Scholar
Wagner, U., Handke, L., Dörfel, D., & Walter, H. (2012). An experimental decision-making paradigm to distinguish guilt and regret and their self-regulating function via loss averse choice behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(431). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00431Google Scholar
Weber, J. M., Kopelman, S., & Messick, D. M., (2004). A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 281307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J. L., Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 698722.Google Scholar
Wohl, M. J., Hornsey, M. J., & Philpot, C. R. (2011). A critical review of public apologies: Aims, pitfalls, and effectiveness. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5(1), 70100.Google Scholar
Zeelenberg, M., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2008). The role of interpersonal harm in distinguishing regret from guilt. Emotion, 8, 589596.Google Scholar
Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2007). A theory of regret regulation 1.0. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 318.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×