Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-nc56l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T23:36:18.380Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

Chapter 15 - The Suicidal Patient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2025

By
Ryan E. Lawrence
Edited by
Marsal Sanches  and
Jair C. Soares
Marsal Sanches
Affiliation:
McGovern Medical School, Texas
Jair C. Soares
Affiliation:
McGovern Medical School, Texas
Get access

Summary

Suicide is a major problem around the globe. Among various psychiatric diagnoses, schizophrenia confers the greatest risk to an individual, while depression confers the greatest risk to populations due to higher prevalence. Predicting suicide attempts with specificity is a major challenge for clinicians. Evidence-based screening and assessment tools exist, which can help standardize the evaluation process, but these tools have limited specificity, sensitivity, and negative predictive value. Best practice is to use these tools in the context of a full clinical assessment that includes a medical and psychiatric history, a mental status exam, obtaining collateral, and eliciting risk and protective factors. The stress-diathesis model posits that suicidal behavior is the result of complex interactions between an acute stressor and underlying neurobiological vulnerability. Evidence supports treating suicide risk through lethal means restriction, outreach after discharge, psychiatric medication where appropriate (antidepressants, lithium, clozapine, ketamine), psychotherapy (cognitive behavior therapy, dialectical behavior therapy), and safety planning. When clinicians identify suicide risk factors and provide appropriate interventions, lives are saved.

Keywords

suicidesuicide attemptsuicide assessmentsuicide neurobiologyself-harm
Type
Chapter
Information
Fundamentals of Clinical Psychiatry
A Practical Handbook
 , pp. 134 - 144
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

World Health Organization. Suicide worldwide in 2019: global health estimates. 2021 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240026643 (accessed December 22, 2022).Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Suicide Prevention. 2022. www.who.int/health-topics/suicide#tab=tab_1 (accessed December 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Yeh, H.-H., Westphal, J., Hu, Y., et al. Diagnosed mental health conditions and risk of suicide mortality. Psychiatr Serv 2019; 70(9): 750–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, J. J., Rizk, M. M.. A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior. Am J Psychiatry 2020; 177(10): 902–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olfson, M., Wall, M., Wang, S., et al. Suicide following deliberate self-harm. Am J Psychiatry 2017; 174(8): 765–774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runeson, B., Odeberg, J., Pettersson, A., et al. Instruments for the assessment of suicide risk: a systematic review evaluating the certainty of the evidence. PLoS ONE 2017; 12(7): e0180292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, G. E., Coleman, K. J., Rossom, R. C., et al. Risk of suicide attempt and suicide death following completion of the Patient Health Questionnaire depression module in community practice. J Clin Psychiatry 2016; 77(2): 221–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Joint Commission. National Patient Safety Goals Effective January 2023 for the Hospital Program. 2022 www.jointcommission.org (accessed December 27, 2022).Google Scholar
Ryan, E. P., Oquendo, M. A.. Suicide risk assessment and prevention: challenges and opportunities. Focus 2020; 18: 88–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connor, E, Henninger, M., Perdue, L. A., et al. Screening for depression, anxiety, and suicide risk in adults: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence Synthesis Number 223. AHRQ Publication No 22-05295-ER-1, August 2022 www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org (accessed December 27, 2022).Google Scholar
Gratch, I., Choo, T.-H., Galfalvy, H., et al. Detecting suicidal thoughts: the power of ecological momentary assessment. Depress Anxiety 2021; 38(1): 8–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, R. E., Oquendo, M. A., Stanley, B.. Religion and suicide risk: a systematic review. Arch Suicide Res 2016; 20(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, R. E., Brent, D., Mann, J. J., et al. Religion as a risk factor for suicide attempt and suicide ideation among depressed patients. J Nerv Ment Dis 2016; 204(11): 845–850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yip, P. S. F., Caine, E., Yousuf, S., et al. Means restriction for suicide prevention. The Lancet 2012; 379(9834): 2393–2399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, J. J., Michel, C. A., Auerbach, R. P.. Improving suicide prevention through evidence-based strategies: a systematic review. Am J Psychiatry 2021; 178(7): 611–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, E. M., Coryell, W., Leung, S., et al. Effects of somatic treatments on suicidal ideation and completed suicides. Brain Behav 2021; 11(11): e2381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, B., Brown, G. K.. Safety planning intervention: a brief intervention to mitigate suicide risk. Cogn Behav Pract 2012; 19(2): 256–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, B., Brown, G. K., Brenner, L. A.. Comparison of the safety planning intervention with follow-up vs usual care of suicidal patients treated in the emergency department. JAMA Psychiatry 2018; 75(9): 894–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Layman, D. M., Kammer, J., Leckman-Westin, E., et al. The relationship between suicidal behaviors and Zero Suicide organizational best practices in outpatient mental health clinics. Psychiatr Serv 2021; 72(10): 1118–1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erlich, M. D., Rolin, S. A., Dixon, L. B., et al. Why we need to enhance suicide postvention: evaluating a survey of psychiatrists’ behaviors after the suicide of a patient. J Nerv Ment Dis 2017; 205(7): 507–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. Suicide. 2022. www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide (accessed December 22, 2022).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×