Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:46:03.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Implementing Evidence-Based Policing

Findings from a Process Evaluation of the EMUN Reform in the Israel Police

from Part IV - Challenges to the Implementation of Evidence-Based Policing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2023

David Weisburd
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem and George Mason University, Virginia
Tal Jonathan-Zamir
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Gali Perry
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Badi Hasisi
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access

Summary

Evidence-based policing requires not only the production of high-quality research but also the implementation of those research findings as part of a police organization’s work. To date, there has been relatively limited empirical assessment of how to best achieve successful implementation. This chapter presents findings from the process evaluation of the EMUN reform in the Israel Police. The reform institutionalized several evidence-based policing approaches and has been demonstrated as effective in reducing and preventing crime. Our qualitative analysis uncovered three themes associated with a heightened capability to practice evidence-based policing: the ability to analyze data and reflect on it, organizational flexibility, and local engagement with the reform. These themes resonate with the existing literature in the field and are of broad relevance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aviv, G., & Weisburd, D. (2016). Reducing the gap in perceptions of legitimacy of victims and non-victims: The importance of police performance. International Review of Victimology, 22(2), 83104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzkar, F., Baradaran, H. R., & Koohpayehzadeh, J. (2018). Knowledge, attitudes and practice of physicians toward evidence‐based medicine: A systematic review. Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine, 11(4), 246251.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Melhuish, E. C., & Barnes, J. (Eds.) (2007). The national evaluation of Sure Start: does area-based early intervention work?. Policy Press.Google Scholar
Ben-Porat, G., Yuval, F., & Mizrahi, S. (2012). The challenge of diversity management: police reform and the Arab minority in Israel. Policy Sciences, 45(3), 243263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, K. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2016). Situational prevention. In Weisburd, D., Farrington, D.P., & Gill’s, C. (Eds.), What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation (pp. 111135). Springer.Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Turchan, B. S., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2019). Hot spots policing and crime reduction: an update of an ongoing systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 289311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77101.Google Scholar
Century, J., Rudnick, M., & Freeman, C. (2010). A framework for measuring fidelity of implementation: A foundation for shared language and accumulation of knowledge. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), 199218.Google Scholar
Chalmers, I., Dickersin, K., & Chalmers, T. C. (1992). Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane’s agenda. British Medical Journal, 305(6857), 786788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, V., Braun, V., & Hayfield, N. (2015). Thematic analysis. In Smith’s, J. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 222248). Sage.Google Scholar
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordner, G., & Biebel, E. P. (2005). Problem‐oriented policing in practice. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(2), 155180.Google Scholar
Crank, J. P., & Langworthy, R. (1992). Institutional perspective on policing. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83, 338.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147160.Google Scholar
Draaisma, E., Bekhof, J., Langenhorst, V. J., & Brand, P. L. (2018). Implementing evidence-based medicine in a busy general hospital department: results and critical success factors. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 23(5), 173177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacomantonio, C., & Litmanovitz, Y. (2017). Implementation fidelity in a loosely coupled system: The challenges of maintaining consistent ‘problem theory’ and ‘programme theory’ in a multi-force training pilot. Policing and Society, 27(6), 116Google Scholar
Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 399428.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving Policing: A Problem-Oriented Approach. Crime & Delinquency, 25(2), 236258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M., Joy, E., Plath, D., & Webb, S. A. (2013). Implementing evidence-based practice: A review of the empirical research literature. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(2), 157166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M., Joy, E., Plath, D., & Webb, S. A. (2015). What supports and impedes evidence-based practice implementation? A survey of Australian social workers. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 667684.Google Scholar
Hasisi, B., Weisburd, D., Litmanovitz, Y., Carmel, T., Tshuva, S., & Trachtenberg, T. (2019). EMUN evaluation report: Traffic disturbances and reckless driving. Research Essence: A collection of Studies on Police and Criminology. Department of Planning and Strategy, Israel Police (pp. 29–60).Google Scholar
Hasisi, B., Weisburd, D., Litmanovitz, Y., Tshuva, S., & Trachtenberg, T. (2021). EMUN evaluation report: Violence Problem Category. Research Essence: A collection of Studies on Police and Criminology. Department of Planning and Strategy, Israel Police (pp. 247281).Google Scholar
Hinkle, J. C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., & Petersen, K. (2020). Problem‐oriented policing for reducing crime and disorder: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 16(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1089Google Scholar
Jonathan-Zamir, T., Weisburd, D., Dayan, M., & Zisso, M. (2019). The proclivity to rely on professional experience and evidence-based policing: Findings from a survey of high-ranking officers in the Israel Police. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(10), 14561474.Google Scholar
Kadosh, H. (2015). Evolving systems of performance indicators in the Israel Police. Research Essence: A collection of Studies on Police and Criminology. Department of Planning and Strategy, Israel Police (pp. 19–26).Google Scholar
Kendall, J. (1999). Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(6), 743757.Google Scholar
Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998). Enabling the implementation of evidence-based practice: a conceptual framework. BMJ Quality & Safety, 7(3), 149158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koper, C. S., & Lum, C. (2012). Incorporating research into daily police practices: The Matrix Demonstration Project. Translational Criminology, Fall issue, 16–17.Google Scholar
Litmanovitz, Y., Hasisi, B, Weisburd, D., & Tshuva, S. (2021). Gun violence in the Arab society in Israel: Findings of the process evaluation of the EMUN reform. Research Essence: A collection of Studies on Police and Criminology. Department of Planning and Strategy, Israel Police (pp. 226–245).Google Scholar
Lum, C. M., & Koper, C. S. (2017). Evidence-based policing: Translating research into practice. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lum, C., Telep, C. W., Koper, C. S., & Grieco, J. (2012). Receptivity to research in policing. Justice Research and Policy, 14(1), 6195.Google Scholar
Maguire, E. R. (2003). Organizational structure in American police agencies: Context, complexity, and control. SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, E. R., & Katz, C. M. (2002). Community policing, loose coupling, and sensemaking in American police agencies. Justice Quarterly, 19(3), 503536.Google Scholar
Mastrofski, S. D., Ritti, R. R., & Hoffmaster, D. (1987). Organizational determinants of police discretion: The case of drinking-driving. Journal of Criminal Justice, 15(5), 387402.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L., & Neyroud, P. (2020). The Campbell Crime & Justice Coordinating Group: Celebrating 20 years of achievements. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 16(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1099Google Scholar
Mazerolle, L., & Ransley, J. (2019). Third-party policing. In Weisburd, D. & Braga, A. A. (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (2nd ed.) (pp. 347365). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neyroud, P. W. (2017). Learning to Field Test in Policing: Using an analysis of completed randomised controlled trials involving the police to develop a grounded theory on the factors contributing to high levels of treatment integrity in Police Field Experiments (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge).Google Scholar
Neyroud, P., & Weisburd, D. (2014). Transforming the police through science: The challenge of ownership. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 8(4), 287293.Google Scholar
Neyroud, P., & Weisburd, D. (this volume). Re-Inventing Policing: Using Science to Transform Policing. In Weisburd, D., Jonathan, T., Perry, G. & Hasisi, B. (Eds.), The Future of Evidence-Based Policing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Policy press.Google Scholar
Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. (2009). Promoting evidence-based practice: Models and mechanisms from cross-sector review. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 552559.Google Scholar
Perry, G., & Jonathan-Zamir, T. (2020). Expectations, Effectiveness, Trust, and Cooperation: Public Attitudes towards the Israel Police during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 14(4), 10731091.Google Scholar
Rycroft-Malone, J. (2004). The PARIHS framework – a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 19(4), 297304.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J. (2006). Collective efficacy theory: Lessons learned and directions for future inquiry. Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory, 15, 149–67.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., (2002). Evidence-based policing: Social organization of information for social control. In Waring, E. & Weisburd, D. (Eds.), Crime and social organization (pp. 217248). Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (2009). Evidence and liberty: The promise of experimental criminology. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 9(1), 528.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W. (2015). A tipping point for “totally evidenced policing” ten ideas for building an evidence-based police agency. International Criminal Justice Review, 25(1), 1129.Google Scholar
Shitrit, S. (2019). “It all depends on the police officer…” The Israel Police and Public Trust 1948–1953. Police & History, 1, 5088.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G., & Hartnett, S. M. (2019). Community policing. In Weisburd, D. & Braga’s, A. A. (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives, (2nd Ed., pp. 2744).Google Scholar
Ubbink, D. T., Guyatt, G. H., & Vermeulen, H. (2013). Framework of policy recommendations for implementation of evidence-based practice: a systematic scoping review. BMJ open, 3(1), 112.Google Scholar
van Dijk, N., Hooft, L., & Wieringa-de Waard, M. (2010). What are the barriers to residents’ practicing evidence-based medicine? A systematic review. Academic Medicine, 85(7), 11631170.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. (2003). Ethical Practice and Evaluation of Interventions in Crime and Justice: The Moral Imperative for Randomized Trials. Evaluation Review, 27(3), 336354.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53(2), 133157.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2018). The Winding Road to Evidence-Based Policy in Corrections: A Case Study of the Israel Prison Service. Israel Law Review, 51(1), 111125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisburd, D., Hasisi, B., Litmanovitz, Y., Carmel, T., & Tshuva, S. (2020). Institutionalizing problem‐oriented policing: An evaluation of the EMUN reform in Israel. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(3), 941964.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Majimundar, M. K. (Eds.) (2018). Proactive policing: Effects on crime and communities. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Neyroud, P. (2011). Police science: Toward a new paradigm. New Perspectives in Policing. Harvard Kennedy School Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management & National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L. A., Ready, J., Eck, J. E., Hinkle, J. C., & Gajewski, F. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44(3), 549592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B., Perillo, S., & Brown, T. (2015). What are the factors of organisational culture in health care settings that act as barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice? A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 35(2), e34e41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.012Google Scholar
Willis, J. J. (2013). Improving police: What’s craft got to do with it. Ideas in American Policing, 16, 113.Google Scholar
Willis, J. J., Mastrofski, S. D., & Weisburd, D. (2007). Making sense of COMPSTAT: A theory‐based analysis of organizational change in three police departments. Law & Society Review, 41(1), 147188.Google Scholar
Worden, R. E., & McLean, S. J. (2017). Mirage of police reform. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×