Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:06:30.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Looking Back on the Challenges to Evidence-Based Policing

A Chief ’s Perspective

from Part V - The Practitioner’s Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2023

David Weisburd
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem and George Mason University, Virginia
Tal Jonathan-Zamir
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Gali Perry
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Badi Hasisi
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access

Summary

Over the past two decades, evidence-based policing has become accepted by practitioners around the world. This chapter focuses on evidence-based policing from the perspective of one who has served as a police chief in four different cities, implemented problem-oriented policing in three agencies and engaged in numerous research initiatives with a view toward improving police effectiveness. It discusses the risks and rewards of a police chief conducting research in a real-world laboratory. It provides suggestions on how researchers might encourage broader adoption of evidence-based practices in the future. Finally, the chapter identifies several areas in need of attention by researches in the future.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batts, A., deLone, M., & Stephens, D. (2014). Policing and wrongful convictions. National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bayley, D., & Nixon, C. (2010). The changing environment for policing, 1985–2008. National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bayley, D. H., & Weisburd, D. (2009). Cops and spooks: The role of police in counterterrorism. In Weisburd, D., Feucht, T., Hakimi, I., Lois, M., & Perry, S. (Eds.), To protect and to serve: Policing in an age of terrorism (pp. 8199). Springer.Google Scholar
Bowers, W., & Hirsch, J. (1987). The impact of foot patrol staffing on crime and disorder in Boston: An unmet promise. American Journal of Policing, 6(1), 1744.Google Scholar
Cozens, P., & Love, T. (2015). A review and current status of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED). Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 393412.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E., & Spelman, W. (1987). Problem-solving: Problem-oriented policing in Newport News. Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
Garner, J., & Maxwell, C. (1999). Measuring the use of force by and against the police in six jurisdictions: An overview of national and local data. National Institute of Justice. Washington DC.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving policing: A problem-oriented approach. Crime & Delinquency, 25(2), 236258.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P. W., Chaiken, J., Petersilia, M., & Prusoff, L. (1975). Criminal investigation process, III: Observations and analysis. RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Ikerd, T., & Walker, S. (2010). Making police reforms endure: The keys for success. Office of Community Oriented Policing. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2005). Post 9/11 policing: The crime-control-homeland security paradigm – Taking command of new realities. International Association of Chiefs of Police.Google Scholar
Jonathan-Zamir, T., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2014). Policing terrorism, crime control, and police-community relations: Learning from the Israeli experience. SpringerGoogle Scholar
Kansas City Police Department. (1977). Response time analysis. Kansas City Police Department.Google Scholar
Kelling, G. L., Pate, A., Dieckman, D., & Brown, C. E. (1974). The Kansas City preventive patrol experiment: Technical report. Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Kerner Commission. (1968). Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders.Google Scholar
Klockers, K., Ivkovic, S., & Haberfeld, M. (2006). Enhancing police integrity. Springer.Google Scholar
Lum, C., & Koper, C. (2017). Evidence based policing: Translating research into practice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mastrofski, S., Parks, R., Reiss, A., & Worden, R. 1999. Policing neighborhoods: A Report from St. Petersburg. National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Milton, C. (1972). Women in policing. Police Foundation.Google Scholar
National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice and Goals. (1973). Report on Police. Government Printing Office. Washington DC.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Neyroud, P., & Weisburd, D. (this volume). Re-Inventing Policing: Using Science to Transform Policing. In Weisburd, D., Jonathan, T., Perry, G. & Hasisi, B., (Eds.), The future of evidence-based policing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pate, A., Bowers, R., & Parks, R. (1976). Three approaches to criminal apprehension in Kansas City: An evaluation Report. Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Pate, A., & Skogan, W. (1985). Coordinated community policing: The Newark experience. Technical report. Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Perry, G., & Jonathan-Zamir, T. (2020). Expectations, effectiveness, trust, and cooperation: Public attitudes toward the Israel Police during the COVID-19 pandemic. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 14(4), 10731091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Police Foundation. (1981). The Newark foot patrol experiment. Police Foundation.Google Scholar
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). The challenge of crime in a free society. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, J. H. (2016). Intelligence-led policing. Routledge.Google Scholar
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1, 920. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002Google Scholar
Sherman, L. (1998). Evidence based policing. Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Sherman, L., & Berk, R. (1984a). Specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault Minneapolis. National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Sherman, L., & Berk, R. (1984b). Specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 261272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, L., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General Deterrent Effects of Police Patrol in Crime “Hot Spots”: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4):625648.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (2006). Police and community in Chicago: A tale of three cities. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, W., & Brown, D. K. (1981). Calling the police: A replication of the citizen reporting component of the Kansas City response time analysis. Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
Stephens, D. (1994). St. Petersburg Community Survey Results. St. Petersburg Police Department.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Mastrofski, S.D., Willis, J.J., & Greenspan, R. (2006). Changing so that everything can remain the same: Compstat and American policing. In Weisburd, D. & Braga, A.A. (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 284304). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Neyroud, P. (2011). Police science: Toward a new paradigm. New perspectives in policing. Harvard Executive Session on Policing and Public Safety. National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Wells, B. W. (2003, September). Bush’s war on cops. Washington Monthly www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0309.wallace-wells.html.Google Scholar
Wilt, G. M., Bannon, J. D., Breedlove, R. K., Kennish, J. W., Sandker, D. M., & Sawtell, R. K. (1977). Domestic violence and the police: Studies in Detroit and Kansas City. Police Foundation.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×