Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:24:15.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Continuity and Change in Party Organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2016

Edited by
Alan S. Gerber  and
Eric Schickler
Alan S. Gerber
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Eric Schickler
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Governing in a Polarized Age
Elections, Parties, and Political Representation in America
 , pp. 113 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association, 1950. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties.” American Political Science Review 44 (September): 1–14.Google Scholar
Arieff, Irwin B. 1979. “House Freshmen Republicans Seek Role as Power Brokers.” Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, July 7, 1339–45.Google Scholar
Bolton, Alexander. 2007. “Senate GOP Begins Repair of Messaging,” The Hill, January 17.Google Scholar
Cook, Timothy E. 1989. Making Laws and Making News: Media Strategies in the U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Egar, William T. 2016. “Tarnishing Opponents, Polarizing Congress: The House Minority Party and the Construction of the Roll-Call Record.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. doi: 10.1111/lsq.12135Google Scholar
Evans, C. Lawrence. 2001. “Committees, Leaders, and Message Politics.” In Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed., Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 217–43.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Lawrence, and Oleszek, Walter J.. 2002. “Message Politics and Senate Procedure.” In The Contentious Senate: Partisanship, Ideology, and the Myth of Cool Judgment, Campbell, Colton C. and Rae, Nicol C., eds. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 107–30.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O. 1970. The Minority Party in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Gailey, Phil. 1982. “From Majority Leader to Minority Leader.” New York Times, March 9, A20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmour, John B. 1995. Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Glassman, Matthew. 2012. “Congressional Leadership: A Resource Perspective.” In Party and Procedure in the United States Congress, Straus, Jacob R., ed., Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 15–34.Google Scholar
Green, Matthew N. 2010. The Speaker of the House: A Study of Leadership. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Matthew N. 2015. Underdog Politics: The Minority Party in the U.S. House of Representatives. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, Justin, Messing, Solomon, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2012. “How Words and Money Cultivate a Personal Vote: The Effect of Legislator Credit Claiming on Constituent Credit Allocation.” American Political Science Review 106 (4): 703–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groseclose, Tim, and McCarty, Nolan. 2001. “The Politics of Blame: Bargaining before an Audience.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 100–19.Google Scholar
Grove, Benjamin. 2005. “In Reid’s War Room, the Battle Rages On.” Las Vegas Sun, November 6.Google Scholar
Gugliotta, Guy and Eilperin, Juliet. 1998. “Gingrich Steps Down in Face of Rebellion.” Washington Post, November 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Douglas B. 1998. “The Rise of the Public Speakership.” Political Science Quarterly 113 (2): 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Douglas B. 2005. “Orchestrating Party Talk: A Party-Based View of One-Minute Speeches in the House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (1): 127–41.Google Scholar
Hess, Stephen. 1991. Live from Capitol Hill: Studies of Congress and the Media. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hulse, Carl. 2006. “G.O.P. in House Gears Up for New Leadership Fight.” New York Times, November 15.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2012. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 8th edition. New York: Pearson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kucinich, Jackie. 2009. “Boehner Expands GOP Communications Plans.” Roll Call, April 13, www.rollcall.com/issues/54_115/-33933-1.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2011. “Making Laws and Making Points: Senate Governance in an Era of Uncertain Majorities.” The Forum 9 (4): Article 3.Google Scholar
Mackaman, Frank H., ed. 1981. Understanding Congressional Leadership. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Malbin, Michael J. 1977. “The Senate Republican Leaders: Life Without a President.” National Journal, May 21, 776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malecha, Gary Lee, and Reagan, Daniel J.. 2012. The Public Congress: Congressional Deliberation in a New Media Age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Parnes, Amie. 2008. “GOP Senators Using Online System.” Politico, May 22.Google Scholar
Peabody, Robert L. 1981. “Senate Party Leadership: From the 1950s to the 1980s.” In Understanding Congressional Leadership, Mackaman, Frank H., ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. Eric, Reynolds, Parker H., and Wilhelm, Amber Hope. 2010. “House of Representatives and Senate Staff Levels in Member, Committee, Leadership, and Other Offices, 1977–2010.” Congressional Research Service Report, R41366, August 10.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2015. “A Deep Dive Into Party Affiliation: Sharp Differences by Race, Gender, Generation, Education,” April 7, www.people-press.org/2015/04/07/a-deep-dive-into-party-affiliation/.Google Scholar
Pierce, Emily. 2010. “Reid Turns Messaging Over to Schumer, Stabenow.” Roll Call, November 15.Google Scholar
Remini, Robert V. 2006. The House: The History of the House of Representatives. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Rich, Spencer. 1977. “New Staff, Mission Planned for Senate GOP Policy Unit.” Washington Post, January 1, A4.Google Scholar
Roberts, Steven V. 1981. “In Era of Permanent Campaign, Parties Look to 1982.” New York Times, January 26.Google Scholar
Roberts, Steven V. 1983. “One Conservative Faults Two Parties.” New York Times, August 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1985. “The New American Political Party.” American Political Science Review 79 (4): 1152–69.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1991. Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sellers, Patrick. 2010. Cycles of Spin: Strategic Communication in the U.S. Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
“The Senator from Tennessee May Hold the Key to Reagan’s Economic Plans.” 1981. National Journal, April 11.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1983. Majority Leadership in the U.S. House. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. The Transformation of the U. S. Senate. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 2007. Party Influence in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stanton, John. 2006. “Frist Launches Message Shop.” Roll Call, January 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James, and Stewart, Charles III. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45(1): 136–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–96.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 519–533.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Royce C., Lewis, Jeffrey B., Lo, James, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2009. “Comparing NOMINATE and IDEAL: Points of Difference and a Monte Carlo Test.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34(4): 555–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Royce C., Poole, Keith T., Rosenthal, Howard, Lewis, Jeffrey B., and Lo, James. 2013. “The Structure of Utility in Spatial Models of Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 57(4): 1008–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua. 2012. “Using Roll Call Estimates to Test Models of Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua D. and Lapinski, John S.. 2006. “Measuring Legislative Accomplishment, 1877–1946.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 232–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua D. and Lapinski, John S.. 2008. “Laws and Roll Calls in the U.S. Congress, 1891–1994.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 33(4): 511–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua D. and Jackman, Simon. 2009. “To Simulate or NOMINATE?” Legislative Studies Quarterly XXXIV(4): 593–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, John. 1999. “Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 93(4): 821–835.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. III, Barrett, Andrew, and Peake, Jeffrey. 1997. “The Legislative Impact of Divided Government.” American Journal of Political Science 41(2): 545–563.Google Scholar
Fahrenthold, David A., Rucker, Philip, and Sonmez, Felicia. 2010. “Stormy 111th Congress Was Still the Most Productive in Decades.” Washington Post December 23, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/22/AR2010122205620.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groseclose, Tim, Levitt, Steven, and Snyder, James Jr. 1999. “Comparing Interest Group Scores Across Time and Chambers: Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress.” American Political Science Review 93(1) 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc. 2009. “Putting Polarization in Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 39(2009): 413–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, David R. 2001. “Party Polarization and Legislative Gridlock.” Political Research Quarterly 54: 125–41.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 2011. “Historical Approaches to the Study of Congress: Toward a Congressional Vantage on American Political Development.” In The Oxford Handbook of The American Congress. Schickler, Eric and Lee, Frances E., eds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 2012. Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Origins of Our Time. New York: Liveright/W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Katnelson, Ira and Lapinski, John. 2006. “The Substance of Representation: Studying Policy Content and Legislative Behavior.” In The Macropolitics of Congress. Adler, E. Scott and Lapinski, John, eds. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira and Mulroy, Quinn Weber. 2012. “Was the South Pivotal? Situated Partisanship and Policy Coalitions during the New Deal and Fair Deal.” Journal of Politics 74(April): 604–620.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2000. “Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapinski, John. 2008. “Policy Substance and Performance in American Lawmaking, 1877–1994.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 235–251.Google Scholar
Lapinski, John. 2013. The Substance of Representation: Congress, American Political Development and Lawmaking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2008. “Agreeing to Disagree: Agenda Content and Senate Partisanship, 1981–2004.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 33(May): 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1966. Party Loyalty Among Congressmen. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David. 2005. “Wars and American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 3(September): 473–493.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan. 2007. “The Policy Consequences of Political Polarization.” In The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism. Pierson, Paul and Skocpol, Theda, eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2003. “Political Polarization and Income Inequality.” Princeton University Working Paper.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, James T. 1967. Congressional Conservatism and the New Deal: The Growth of the Conservative Coalition in Congress, 1933–1939. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas and Saez, Emmanuel. 2003. “Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998.” Quarterly Journal of Economics CXVIII (1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith and Daniels, Stephen. 1985. “Ideology, Party, and Voting in the U.S. Congress.” American Political Science Review 79(2): 373–399.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith and Rosenthal, Howard. 2007. Ideology and Congress. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Brian. 2011. Politics, Parties, and Elections in America, 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wawro, Gregory J. and Katznelson, Ira. 2013. “Designing Historical Social Scientific Inquiry: How Parameter Heterogeneity Can Bridge the Methodological Divide between Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.” American Journal of Political Science. Published online 20 August.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×