Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:28:30.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The Contribution Good as the Foundation of the Industrial Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2021

By
Terence Kealey  and
Martin Ricketts
Edited by
Erwin Dekker  and
Pavel Kuchař
Erwin Dekker
Affiliation:
Mercatus Center, George Mason University, Virginia
Pavel Kuchař
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

The Industrial Revolution cannot readily be modelled if research is treated as a public, private or club good. Recent work on the knowledge commons and on ‘network’ and ‘anti-rival’ goods has offered more promising perspectives, but we have proposed that research is most suitably considered as a novel good, namely a ‘contribution good.’ A contribution good is a non-depletable good jointly available only to those who have contributed to its creation. Here we show that the Industrial Revolution, and some of the institutional developments that accompanied it, conform well with a contribution good model of technical change.

Keywords

Contribution GoodsIndustrial RevolutionScientific RevolutionScientific SocietiesEconomic GrowthEconomies of Scale.
Type
Chapter
Information
Governing Markets as Knowledge Commons , pp. 19 - 57
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, Ajay, Kapur, Devesh and McHale, John. 2008. “How Do Spatial and Social Proximity Influence Knowledge Flows? Evidence from Patent Data.” Journal of Urban Economics 64: 258–269.Google Scholar
Allen, Darcy and Potts, Jason. 2016. “How Innovation Commons Contribute to Discovering and Developing New Technologies.” International Journal of the Commons 10: 1035–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Robert. 1983. “Collective Invention.” Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 4: 1–24.Google Scholar
Allen, Robert. 2009. The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Thomas, Hyman, Diane B. and Pinckney, David L.. 1983. “Transferring Technology to the Small Manufacturing Firm.” Research Policy 12: 199–211.Google Scholar
Apostolides, Alexander, Broadberry, Stephen, Campbell, Bruce, Overton, Mark and van Leeuwen, Bas. 2008. English Agricultural Output and Labour Productivity, 1250–1850, Some Preliminary Estimates. www.basvanleeuwen.net/bestanden/agriclongrun1250to1850.pdfGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, edited by Nelson, Richard R., pp. 609–625. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, Brian. 2009. The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Aubrey, John. 1982. Brief Lives, edited by Barber, Richard. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. 1626. New Atlantis, Reproduced in The Works of Lord Bacon (1838). London: William Ball.Google Scholar
Bailey, Michael, Cao, Rachel, Kuchler, Thersea, Stroebel, Johannes and Wong, Arlene. 2018. “Social Connectedness: Measurement, Determinants, and Effects.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 32: 259–280.Google Scholar
Batho, Gordon. 2000. “Thomas Harriot and the Northumberland Household.” In Thomas Harriot: An Elizabethan Man of Science, edited by Fox, Robert, pp. 31–32. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baumol, William. 1990. “Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive.” Journal of Political Economy 8: 893–921.Google Scholar
Bell, Alex, Chetty, Raj, Jaravel, Xavier, Petkova, Neviana and van Reenen, John. 2019. “Who Becomes an Inventor in America? The Importance of Exposure to Innovation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 134: 647–713.Google Scholar
Bessen, James and Nuvolari, Alessandro. 2016. “Knowledge Sharing among Inventors: Some Historical Perspectives.” In Revolutionizing Innovation: Users, Communities, and Open Innovation, edited by Harhoff, Dietmar and Lakhani, Karim R., pp. 135–157. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen, Campbell, Bruce M. S., Klein, Alexander, Overton, Mark and van Leeuwen, Bas. 2015. British Economic Growth, 1270–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, James and Slawinski, Michael. 2017. On the Foundations of Seismology: Bringing Idealizations Down to Earth. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Burchardi, Konrad and Hassan, Tarek. 2011. The Economic Impact of Social Ties: Evidence from German Reunification. NBER Working Paper No. 17186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrus, Trevor. 2019. “The Systematic Prohibition of U.S. Drug Science.” In Scientocracy, edited by Michaels, Patrick and Kealey, Terence, pp. 139–160. Washington, DC: The Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Carhart-Harris, Robin, Bolstridge, Mark, Rucker, James et al. 2016. “Psilocybin with Psychological Support for Treatment-resistant Depression.” Lancet Psychiatry 3: 619–627.Google Scholar
Clark, Gregory. 2007. A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Wesley and Levinthal, Daniel. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D.” Economics Journal 99: 569–596.Google Scholar
Cormack, Lesley. 1997. Charting an Empire: Geography at the English Universities 1580–1620. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha and David, Paul. 1994. “Toward a New Economics of Science.” Research Policy. 23: 487–521.Google Scholar
Deane, Phyllis. 1979. The First Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doudna, Jennifer and Sternberg, Samuel. 2017. A Crack in Creation. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, Harcourt.Google Scholar
Dowey, James. 2017. Mind over Matter: Access to Knowledge and the British Industrial Revolution. PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Dudley, Leonard. 2012. Mothers of Innovation: How Expanding Social Networks Gave Birth to the Industrial Revolution. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Dudley, Leonard. 2016. “Language Standardization and the Industrial Revolution.” Oxford Economic Papers 69: 1138–1161.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, Richard. 1844 [1820]. Memoirs. London: Richard Bentley.Google Scholar
Erlande-Brandenburg, Alain. 1995. The Cathedral Builders of the Middle Ages. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Faber, Harald. 1931. Cooperation in Danish Agriculture. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Fanning, Philip. 2009. Isaac Newton and the Transmutation of Alchemy. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Fouquet, Roger and Broadberry, Stephen. 2015. “Seven Centuries of European Economic Growth and Decline.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29: 227–244.Google Scholar
Gilbert, William. 1900 [1600]. On the Magnet. Translated by Thompson, Silvanus. London: The Chiswick Press, 1900, London.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.Google Scholar
van Gompel, Stef. 2019. “Patent Abolition: A Real-Life Historical Study.” Amsterdam University International Law Review 34: 877–922.Google Scholar
Greener, James. 2015. “Thomas Newcomen and His Great Work.” Journal of the Trevithick Society 42: 64–127.Google Scholar
Gregory, Olinthus. 1826. “Speech Delivered at the First Anniversary of the Deptford Mechanics’ Institution.” Mechanics’ Magazine 6: 458–462.Google Scholar
Green, Adam. 2019. “Failed Trials Spark New Approaches and Ideas.” The Financial Times. FT Health Business & Dementia, 18 September 2019, 4.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Georg. 1943 [1544]. “The Letter of Georg Hartmann to Duke Albrecht of Prussia,” translated by Sydney, Chapman. Journal of Geophysical Research 48: 128–130.Google Scholar
Hilaire-Pérez, Liliane. 2002. “Diderot’s Views on Artists’ and Inventors’ Rights: Invention, Imitation and Reputation.” The British Journal for the History of Science 35: 129–150.Google Scholar
von Hippel, Eric. 1998. “The Economics of Product Development by Users.” Management Science 44: 629–644.Google Scholar
Howard, Nicole. 2004. “Rings and Anagrams: Huygens’s System of Saturn.” The Papers of the Bibliographic Society of America 98: 477–510.Google Scholar
Howes, Anton. 2017a. The Spread of Improvement: Why Innovation Accelerated in Britain 1547–1851. Working Paper. www.antonhowes.com/uploads/2/1/0/821082490/spread_of_improvement_working_paper.pdfGoogle Scholar
Howes, Anton. 2017b. The Relevance of Skills to Innovation during the British Industrial Revolution, 1547–1851. Working Paper. https://antonhowes.weebly.com/uploads/2/1/0/8/21082490/howes_innovator_skills_working_paper_may_2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Inkster, Ian. 1991. Science and Technology in History: An Approach to Industrial Development. Camden, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Dan. 2019. The Northumbrians: North-East England and Its People. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Adam, Trajtenberg, Manual and Henserson, Rebecca. 1993. “Geographical Location of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577–598.Google Scholar
Jones, Eric. 1981. “Agriculture 1700–1780.” In The Economic History of Britain 1700–1900, edited by Floud, Rodney and McCloskey, Deirdre, pp. 66–86. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Eric. 2000. Growth Recurring: Economic Change in World History. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kealey, Terence. 2013. The Case against Public Science. Washington, DC: The Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Kealey, Terence and Ricketts, Martin. 2014. “Modelling Science as a Contribution Good.” Research Policy 43: 1014–1024.Google Scholar
Kealey, Terence and Ricketts, Martin. 2020. Innovative Economic Growth: Seven Stages of Understanding. Washington, DC: The Cato Institute. www.cato.org/publications/economic-policy-brief/innovative-economic-growth-seven-stages-understandingGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Morgan. 1997. “The Dynamics of Smithian Growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 939–964.Google Scholar
Kirk, Dudley. 1996. “Demographic Transition Theory.” Population Studies 50: 361–387.Google Scholar
Kohn, Meir. 2005. Origins of Western Economic Success. https://sites.dartmouth.edu/mkohn/origins/Google Scholar
Koppl, Roger, Deveraux, Abigail, Herriott, Jim and Kauffman, Stuart. 2018. “A Simple Combinatorial Model of World Economic History.” arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.04502.pdfGoogle Scholar
Landes, David. 1969. The Unbound Prometheus: Technical Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. New York. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landes, David. 1998. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Latham, Sienna. 2010. “Lady Alcumy”: Elizabethan Gentlewomen and the Practice of Chymistry. MA thesis, Victoria University of Wellington. https://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10063/1546/thesis.pdf?sequence=6Google Scholar
Levin, Richard, Klevorick, Alvin K., Nelson, Richard R. and Winter, Sidney G.. 1987. “Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3: 783–820.Google Scholar
Levy, Stephen. 2001. Crypto: How the Code Rebels Beat the Government – Saving Privacy in the Digital Age. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Linden, Stanton. 1974. Alchemy and the English Literary Imagination, 1385–1633. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Link, Albert and Bauer, Laura. 1989. Cooperative Research in US Manufacturing. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lord, John. 1903. Memoir of John Kay of Bury, Inventor of the Flying Shuttle. Rochdale: James Clegg.Google Scholar
Lux, David and Cook, Harold. 1998. “Closed Circles or Open Networks?: Communications at a Distance during the Scientific Revolution.” History of Science 36: 179–211.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, Alan. 1978. “The Origins of English Individualism: Some Surprises.” Theory and Society 6: 255–277.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, Alan. 2002. The Making of the Modern World: Visions from the West and East. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Christine. 1988. Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 1660–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus. 1982. Phases of Capitalist Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus. 2001. The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edwin, Schwartz, Mark and Wagner, Samuel. 1981. “Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study.” The Economic Journal 91: 907–918.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edwin. 1985. “How Rapidly Does New Technology Leak Out?” Journal of Industrial Economics 34: 217–223.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edwin. 1995. “Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics and Funding.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 77: 55–65.Google Scholar
Marsden, Philip. 2020. “Silent Witnesses.” The Spectator, 13 June, 34–35.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre. 2010. Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Cannot Explain the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McEvedy, Colin and Jones, Richard. 1978. Atlas of World Population History. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Meyer, Peter. 2003. Episodes of Collective Invention. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics Working Papers No. 368.Google Scholar
Meyer, Peter. 2012. Open Technology and the Early Airplane Industry. eh.net/eha/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Meyer.pdfGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Peter. 2015. “The Catapult of Riches: The Invention of the Airplane and Its Industry.” In Institutions, Innovation and Industrialization: Essays in Economic History and Development, edited by Greif, Avner, Kiesling, Lynne and Nye, John, pp. 201–224. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 2002. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 2009. “The Institutional Origins of the Industrial Revolution.” In Institutions and Economic Performance, edited by Helpman, Elhanan, pp. 64–116. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 2016. A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph. 2003. Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 7: Science and Chinese Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. 1959. “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research.” Journal of Political Economy 67: 297–306.Google Scholar
Newman, William and Principe, Lawrence. 1998. “Alchemy vs. Chemistry: The Etymological Origins of a Historiographic Mistake.” Early Science and Medicine 3: 32–65.Google Scholar
Nuvolari, Alessandro. 2004. “Collective Invention during the British Industrial Revolution: The Case of the Cornish Pumping Engine.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 28: 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh. 2014. “The Economics of Guilds.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28: 169–192.Google Scholar
Osborne, Francis. 1689. Works, 9th ed., pp. 449–451, quoted in Thomson, Elizabeth. 1966. The Chamberlain Letters. New York: Capricorn, p. 1.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paganelli, Maria Pia. 2015. “Recent Engagements with Adam Smith and the Scottish Enlightenment.” History of Political Economy 47: 363–394.Google Scholar
Pastorino, Cesare. 2017. “The Philosopher and the Craftsman: Francis Bacon’s Notion of Experiment and Its Debt to Early Stuart Inventors.” Isis 108: 749–768.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1962. “The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory.” Minerva 1: 54–74.Google Scholar
Potts, Jason. 2019. Innovation Commons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Derek de Solla. 1963. Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Purver, Margery. 1967. The Royal Society: Concept and Creation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reeves, Eileen. 1999. Painting the Heavens: Art and Science in the Age of Galileo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul. 1986. “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–1037.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul. 1990. “Endogenous Technical Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98: S71–S102.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1980. “Why Do Firms Do Basic Research (with Their Own Money)?” Research Policy 19: 165–174.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Gary. 1974. “A Tale of Japanese Technological Diffusion in the Meiji Period.” Journal of Economic History 34: 149–165.Google Scholar
Schmitz, James. 1989. “Imitation, Entrepreneurship and Long-Run Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 97: 721–739.Google Scholar
Scott, John. 1996. “Environmental Research Joint Ventures among Manufacturers.” Review of Industrial Organization 11: 655–679.Google Scholar
Scott, John and Scott, Troy. 2017. Intellectual Property, Competition and Science versus Technology. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3077524Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1996. The Scientific Revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Shiue, Carol and Keller, Wolfgang. 2007. “Markets in China and Europe on the Eve of the Industrial Revolution.” American Economic Review 97: 1189–1216.Google Scholar
Short, Simine. 2011. Locomotive to Aeromotive: Octave Chanute and the Transportation Revolution. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1969. “Thomas Hobbes and the Nature of the Early Royal Society.” The Historical Journal 22: 217–239.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1910 [1776]. Wealth of Nations. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Solow, Robert. 1957. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312–320.Google Scholar
Sprat, Thomas. 1667. The History of the Royal Society of London, for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. 1961. “The Economics of Information.” The Journal of Political Economy 69: 213–225.Google Scholar
Thucydides. 2000 [ca 431 BCE]. “The History of the Peloponnesian War.” Ancient History Sourcebook. http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.htmlGoogle Scholar
Toynbee, Arnold. 1884. Lectures on the Industrial Revolution in England. London: Rivington.Google Scholar
Weber, Steven. 2004. The Success of Open Source. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
West, Muriel. 1961. “Notes on the Importance of Alchemy to Modern Science in the Writings of Francis Bacon and Robert Boyle.” Ambix 9: 102–114.Google Scholar
Zilsel, Edgar. 1941. “The Origins of William Gilbert’s Scientific Method.” Journal of the History of Ideas 2: 1–32.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×