Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:14:50.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2023

Yves Sintomer
Yves Sintomer
Affiliation:
Institut Universitaire de France
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Government of Chance
Sortition and Democracy from Athens to the Present
 , pp. 279 - 308
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbas, Nabila (2019), Das Imaginäre und die Revolution, Tunesien in revolutionären Zeiten, Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca (2000), Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil, Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash (2019), “Representation, Bicameralism, Political Equality, and Sortition: Reconstituting the Second Chamber as a Randomly Selected Assembly,” Perspectives on Politics, 18 (1), December, pp. 1059–1078.Google Scholar
Abramson, Jeffrey B. (2003), We the Jury. The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy, Cambridge (MA)/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, John (1976), Adams Papers, III. Thoughts on Government, April 1776, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/06-04-02-0026-0004.Google Scholar
Aguilar Rivera, José Antonio (2015), “Las razones de la tómbola,” Nexos, 1 April.Google Scholar
Aguiton, Christophe and Cardon, Dominique (2007), “The Strength of Weak Cooperation. An Attempt to Understand the Meaning of Web 2.O,” Communication & Strategies, 65, pp. 51–65.Google Scholar
Alciato, Andrea (1615), Les Emblèmes, English edition: Book of Emblems, www.mun.ca/alciato/index.html.Google Scholar
Allen, Robert (2005), Les Tribunaux criminels sous la Révolution et l’Empire, 1792–1811, Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Allswang, John (2000), The Initiative and Referendum in California, 1898–1998, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Ida-Elisabeth and Jaeger, Birgit (1999), “Danish Participatory Models. Scenario Workshops and Consensus Conferences: Towards More Democratic Decision-Making,” Science and Public Policy, 26 (5), pp. 331–340.Google Scholar
ANONYMOUS (1654), Le règlement du Sort, contenant la forme et la manière de procéder à l’élection des officiers de la ville de Marseille, Marseille: Claude Garcin.Google Scholar
ANONYMOUS (1720), Memoriale der Geistlichkeit zu Basel, wegen Einfuehrung eines Looses, zu Hintertreibung der Pratiquen, und Verheutung dess Meineyds dorten vor Raeth und Burger proponirt Anno 1714, Bern: S. Küpffer.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1963), Liber de sortibus ad dominum lacobum de Tonengo (1270–1271), trans. Peter Bartholomew Carey, Dover: Dominican House of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (2010), Summa Theologica (1269–1272), trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Claremont: Coyote Canyon Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1962), The Politics, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1984), The Athenian Constitution, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Armillas, José Antonio and Sesma, José Ángel (1991), La Diputación de Aragón. El Gobierno aragonés, del Reyno a la Comunidad Autónoma, Zaragoza: Oroel.Google Scholar
Avila, Alfredo (1999), En nombre de la nación. La formación del gobierno representativo en México (1808–1824), Mexico: Taurus/CIDE.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo (2002), Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America, Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Azoulay, Vincent (2014), “Rethinking the Political in Ancient Greece,” Annales Histoire, Sciences, Sociales, 69 (3), pp. 385–408.Google Scholar
Bächtiger, André and Steiner, Jürg (2015), “How to Measure the Quality of Deliberation? The Discourse Quality Index (DQI) as a Possible Tool,” in Coleman, Stephen, Przybylska, Anna, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Deliberation and Democracy: Innovative Processes and Institutions Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 173–186.Google Scholar
Bagnasco Gianni, Giovanna (2001), “Le sortes etrusche,” in Cordano, Federica and Grottanelli, Cristiano (eds.), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et, pp. 197–219.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianfranco (2005), Militants and Citizens. The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Keith M. (1990), Inventing the French Revolution: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balibar, Etienne (1989), “Spinoza, the Anti-Orwell: The Fear of the Masses,” Rethinking Marxism, 2 (3), pp. 104–139.Google Scholar
Balibar, Etienne (1998), Droit de cité. Culture et politique en démocratie, Paris: L’Aube.Google Scholar
Balibar, Etienne (2001), Nous, citoyens d’Europe? Les frontières, l’État, le peuple, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Barat, Raphaël (2018), “Les élections que fait le peuple”. République de Genève, vers 1680–1707, Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Barat, Raphaël (2020), “The Introduction of Sortition in the Republic of Geneva (1691)”, in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 260–261.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin (1984), Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berkeley/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Marian (1999), Building a Deliberative Democracy. An Evaluation of Two Citizens’ Juries, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Baron, Hans (1966), The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-On, Shraga (2020), Lot Casting, God, and Man in Jewish Literature: From the Bible to the Renaissance. Ramat-Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press/Jerusalem: Shalom Hartman Institute, 2020 [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Barrio Barrio, Juan Antonio (1991) [1427], “La introducción de la insaculación en la Corona de Aragón. Xátiva, transcripción documental,” Anales de la Universidad de Alicante. Historia Medieval, 1991 (8), pp. 99–114. https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/6982/1/HM_08_05.pdfGoogle Scholar
Beaud, Stéphane and Pialoux, Michel (1999), Retour sur la condition ouvrière, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich (1992), Risk Society, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel (2020), “Dialogue on Sortition with Professors Wang Shaoguang and Yves Sintomer,” https://danielabell.com/2020/08/25/dialogue-on-sortition-with-professors-wang-shaoguang-and-yves-sintomer/.Google Scholar
Belmas, Elisabeth (2006), Jouer autrefois. Essai sur le jeu dans la France moderne (XVI–XVII siècle), Seyssel: Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter (1974), “Goethes Wahlverwandtschaften,” in Tiedemann, R. and Schweppenhäuser, H. (eds.), Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. I, 1. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 125–201.Google Scholar
Berger, Joël, Osterloh, Margit, Rost, Katja, and Ehrmann, Thomas (2020), “How to prevent leadership hubris? Comparing competitive selections, lotteries, and their combination”, The Leadership Quarterly, 31 (5), October, 101388.Google Scholar
Berthout, Augustin (2017), “Le sort est un Dieu. Aux origines du tirage au sort politique à Athènes,” Jus politicum, 17 (January), pp. 709–778.Google Scholar
Biville, Frédérique (2020), “Sors, sortiri, sortitio. Pratiques et lexique du tirage au sort dans le monde romain,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Tirage au sort et démocratie. Histoire, instruments, théories, Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck, 2019, pp. 139–156.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William (1765–1769), Commentaries on the Laws of England, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bleicken, Jochen (1994), Die Athenische Demokratie, Paderborn: Schöning.Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc (1973), The Royal Touch, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Blok, Josine (2014), “Participatory Governance: The Case for Allotment,” Etnofoor (Participation), 26 (2), pp. 73–80.Google Scholar
Blok, Josine (2017), Citizenship in Ancient Athens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blok, Josine (forthcoming), “The Lot and the Ancient Democracy,” in Irad Malkin (forthcoming), Drawing Lots with Ancient Greeks.Google Scholar
Blondiaux, Loïc (1998), La fabrique de l’opinion. Une histoire sociale des sondages, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Blondiaux, Loïc (2008), Le nouvel esprit de la démocratie, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Blondiaux, Loïc and Sintomer, Yves (2002), “Démocratie et délibération,” Politix, 15 (57), pp. 17–35.Google Scholar
Blösel, Wolfgang (2020), “The Sortition of Consular and Praetorian Provinces in the Roman Republic,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 169–181.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Luigi (2006), “Dilemmi della democrazia partecipativa,” Democrazia e diritto, 4, pp. 11–26.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Luigi and Giannetti, Daniela (2007), Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 2, August, thematic issue on citizens’ juries.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Chiapello, Eve (2007), The New Spirit of Capitalism, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bonneuil, Christophe (2006), “Cultures épistémiques et engagement public des chercheurs dans la controverse OGM,” Natures Sciences Sociétés, 14 (3), pp. 257–268.Google Scholar
Bonin, Hugo (2020), Du régime mixte à la ‘vraie démocratie’: une histoire conceptuelle du mot democracy en Grande-Bretagne, 1770–1920, PhD thesis, Paris 8 University/UQAM, October.Google Scholar
Bonin, Hugo, Baeckelandt, Simon, and Wöthrich, Zélie (2021), “‘A Breath of Fresh Air’? Sortition in the Rejuvenation of the French Economic, Social and Environmental Council,” Doctoral and postdoctoral workshop “Sortition in Politics: History, Sociology, Philosophy,” Oxford, February 15, 2021.Google Scholar
Bothorel, Julie (2020), “Civic Sortition in Republican and Imperial Rome. Physical Instruments and Technical Logistics,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane, Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 151–168.Google Scholar
Bothorel, Julie (2022), Le tirage au sort des provinces sous la République, Rome: Collection de l’Ecole française de Rome.Google Scholar
Bouricius, Terrill G. (2013), “Democracy Through Multi-Body Sortition: Athenian Lessons for the Modern Day,” Journal of Public Deliberation, 9 (1), article 11.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1993), Sociology in Question, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bourg, Dominique et al. (2011), Pour une sixième République écologique, Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Bourg, Dominique and Boy, Daniel (2005), Conférences de citoyens, mode d’emploi, Paris: Charles Léopold Mayer/Descartes & Cie.Google Scholar
Brand, Patricia and Guanzini, Catherine (2018), “Rôle du tirage au sort dans les pratiques électorales au XVIIIe siècle. Le cas d’Yverdon et des villes vaudoises,” in Chollet, Antoine and Fontaine, Alexandre (eds.), Expériences du tirage au sort en Suisse et en Europe, Bern: Bibliothek am Guisanplatz, pp. 145–172.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand (1993), La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l'époque de Philippe II, Paris: Le Livre de Poche.Google Scholar
Brucker, Gene A. (1968), “The Ciompi Revolution,” in Rubinstein, N. (ed.), Florentine Studies. Politics and Society in Renaissance Florence. London: Faber, pp. 314–356.Google Scholar
Brucker, Gene A. (1977), The Civic World of Early Renaissance Florence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brucker, Gene A. (1998), Florence: The Golden Age, 1138–1737, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bruni, Leonardo (1987a), “On the Florentine Constitution” [1439, original in Greek], in Griffiths, G., Hankins, J., and Thompson, D. (eds.), The Humanism of Leonardo Bruni. Selected Texts. Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Bruni, Leonardo (1987b), “Oration for the Funeral of Nanni Strozzi” [1428, original in Latin], in Griffiths, G., Hankins, J., and Thompson, D. (eds.), The Humanism of Leonardo Bruni. Selected Texts. Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Bruni, Leonardo (2001–2004), Historiae Florentini Populi, 3 vols, Hankins, James (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruni, Leonardo (2005), In Praise of Florence, Amsterdam: Olive Press.Google Scholar
Buchstein, Hubertus (2009), Demokratie und Lotterie, Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Buonarroti, Philippe (1869) [1828], Gracchus Babeuf et la conjuration des égaux, Paris: Armand Le Chevalier.Google Scholar
Buonocore, Mauro (2006), “Un weekend deliberativo all’ombra del Partenone,” Reset, 96, July–August, pp. 6–8.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund (1775) [1774], “Speech to the Electors of Bristol,” November 3, 1774, in Mr. Burke’s Speeches at His Arrival at Bristol and at The Conclusion of the Poll, London: J. Dodsley (2nd edition).Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund (1854–1856) [1770], “Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents,” 1770, in The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, London, Henry G. Bohn, 1854–56, vol. 1, pp. 347–349.Google Scholar
Burnheim, John (1985), Is Democracy Possible?, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Buttay-Jutier, Florence (2008), Fortuna. Usages politiques d’une allégorie morale à la Renaissance, Paris: Presses Universitaires Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Cadoni, Giorgio (1999), Lotte politiche e riforme istituzionali a Firenze tra il 1494 e il 1502, Rome: Istituto storico italiano per il medio evo.Google Scholar
Caillois, Roger (1967), Les Jeux et les Hommes, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Callenbach, Ernest and Phillips, Michael (2008) [1985], A Citizen Legislature, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel, Lascoumes, Pierre, and Barthe, Yannick (2011), Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy (Inside Technology), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caluwaerts, Didier (2012), Confrontation and Communication: Deliberative Democracy in Divided Belgium, Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.Google Scholar
Cardon, Dominique (2010), La Démocratie Internet. Promesses et limites, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Carson, Lyn, Gastil, John, Hartz-Karp, Janette, and Lubensky, Ron (eds.) (2013), The Australian Citizens’ Parliament and the Future of Deliberative Democracy, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, Lyn and Martin, Brian (1999), Random Selection in Politics, Westport: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Casey, James (1979), The Kingdom of Valencia in the Seventeenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1983), Individu et Cosmos dans la philosophie de la Renaissance, Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (1984), Crossroads in the Labyrinth, Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (1986), Domaines de l’homme, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (1987), The Imaginary Institution of Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (2008), La cité et les lois. Ce qui fait la Grèce 2, séminaires 1983–1983, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, Giovanni (1944), Istorie Fiorentine, Milan: Ed. di Pino.Google Scholar
Celli, Roberto (1980), Pour l’histoire des origines du pouvoir populaire. L’expérience des villes-États italiens (XIème–XIIème siècles), Louvain-la-Neuve: Publications de l’Institut d’études médiévales, 2nd series, 3.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2007), Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone (2009), “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?,” Political Theory, 37 (3), pp. 323–350.Google Scholar
Champeaux, Jacqueline (1982–1987), Fortuna. Recherches sur le culte de la Fortune à Rome, 2 volumes, Rome: French School of Rome.Google Scholar
Cheng, Joseph, Sheh, Yu, and Li, Fan (2015), “Local Government’s Consultative Budgetary Reforms in China: A Case Study of Wenling City,” China International Journal, 13 (1), pp. 115–118.Google Scholar
Chiarelli, Giorgio et al. (1978), Florenz und die große Zeit der Renaissance, Leben und Kultur in einer europäischen Stadt, Würzburg: Georg Popp.Google Scholar
Chojnacki, Stanley (1997), “La formazione della nobiltà dopo la Serrata,” in Storia di Venezia. Dalle origini alla caduta della Serenissima, vol. III, Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana, pp. 641–725.Google Scholar
Chollet, Antoine and Fontaine, Alexandre (eds.) (2018), Expériences du tirage au sort en Suisse et en Europe (XVIe-XXIe siècles). Bern: Publications en série de la bibliothèque Am Guisanplatz, 74.Google Scholar
Chollet, Antoine and Manin, Bernard (2019), “Les postérités inattendues de Principes du gouvernement représentatif: une discussion avec Bernard Manin,” Participations, thematic issue “Le tirage au sort au XXIe siècle,” 1, 23, pp. 171–192.Google Scholar
Christin, Olivier (2014), Vox populi. Une histoire du vote avant le suffrage universel, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Cicero, (1923), De Divinatione, Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cirone, Alessandra and Coppenolle, Brenda van (2019), “Bridging the Gap. Lottery-Based Procedures in Early Parliamentarization,” World Politics, 71 (2), pp. 197–235.Google Scholar
Clastres, Pierre (1980), Recherches d’anthropologie politique, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Clastres, Pierre (1987), Society against the State: Essays in Political Anthropology, New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Claverie, Elisabeth (1984), “De la difficulté de faire un citoyen: les ‘acquittements scandaleux’ du jury dans la France provinciale du début du XIXe siècle,” Études rurales, 95–96, July–December, pp. 143–166.Google Scholar
Cocteau, Jean (1998), Bacchus, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Cohen, Léo (2020), “Ils réussiraient là où nous avons échoué,” Revue XXI, 52, Fall, pp. 118–131.Google Scholar
Condorcet, (1986), Sur les élections et autres textes, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Conso, Giovanni (2001), “Séance d’ouverture,” Revue internationale de droit pénal, 72 (1–2), pp. 15–18.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin (1988), “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with the Moderns,” in Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 309–328.Google Scholar
Contarini, Gasparo (2020) [1543], The Republic of Venice. De magistratibus et republica Venetorum, Toronto/Buffalo/London: The University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Kimberly J. and Powell, Chris (2003), “Unfinished Business: Aboriginal Reconciliation and Restorative Justice in Australia,” Contemporary Justice Review, 6 (3), September, pp. 279–291.Google Scholar
Coote, Anna and Lenaghan, Jo (1997), Citizen’s Juries: Theory into Practice, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Cordano, Federica and Grottanelli, Cristiano (eds.) (2001), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et.Google Scholar
Cordier, Lionel (2020), “Crise démocratique et mutations contemporaines de la représentation politique : l’exemple islandais (2008–2017),” PhD thesis, University Lumière Lyon 2/University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Cordier, Lionel (2021), “Échapper à la conflictualité? Le tirage au sort comme outil de management et d’union nationale,” Raisons politiques, 82, May, pp. 91–105.Google Scholar
Costa Delgado, Jorge (2017a), “Resistencias a la introducción del sorteo entre el asamblearismo y la institucionalización: el caso de Podemos Cádiz,” Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 72, September–December, pp. 221–237.Google Scholar
Costa Delgado, Jorge, Moreno Pestaña, José-Luis, Perez-Rabatel, Lilane, and Sintomer, Yves (2017b), Sorteo y democracia/Sortition and Democracy, thematic issue, Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia, 72, September–December.Google Scholar
Coulanges, Fustel de (1891), “Nouvelles recherches sur le tirage au sort appliqué à la nomination des archontes athéniens,” Nouvelles Recherches sur quelques problèmes d’histoire. Paris: Hachette, pp. 147–179.Google Scholar
Courant, Dimitri (2019), “Délibération et tirage au sort au sein d’une institution permanente. Le Conseil Supérieur de la Fonction Militaire (1968–2016),” Participation, 1, 23, pp. 61–92.Google Scholar
Courant, Dimitri (2020a), “Des mini-publics délibératifs pour sauver le climat? Analyses empiriques de l’Assemblée citoyenne irlandaise et de la Convention citoyenne française,” Archives de philosophie du droit, 62 (1), pp. 487–507.Google Scholar
Courant, Dimitri (2020b), “From Kleroterion to Cryptology: The Act of Sortition in the 21st Century, Instruments and Practices,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 343–371.Google Scholar
Courant, Dimitri (2021), “Citizens’ Assemblies for Referendums and Constitutional Reform: Is There an ‘Irish Model’ for Deliberative Democracy?” Frontiers in Political Science, 8 January.Google Scholar
Courcelle, Pierre (1953), “L’enfant et les ‘sorts bibliques’,” Vigiliae Christianae, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cracco, Giorgio (1979), “Patriziato e oligarchia a Venezia nel Tre-Quattrocento,” in Bertelli, Sergio, Rubinstein, Nicolai, and Smyth, Craig Hugh (eds.), Florence and Venice: Comparisons and Relations. Vol. I: Quattrocento, Florence: La Nuova Italia, pp. 71–98.Google Scholar
Crosby, Ned (1975), In Search of the Competent Citizen, Working Paper, Plymouth: Center for New Democratic Processes.Google Scholar
Crosby, Ned and Nethercut, Doug (2005), “Citizens Juries: Creating a Trustworthy Voice of the People,” in Gastil, John and Levine, Peter (eds.), The Deliberative Democracy Handbook, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 111–119.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin (2004), Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michel, Huntington, Samuel, and Watanuki, Joji (1975), The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Cumont, Franz (1897), “Les Actes De Saint Dasius,” Analecta Bollandiana, 16, pp. 5–16.Google Scholar
Curato, Nicole, Vrydagh, Julien, and Bächtiger, André (eds.) (2020), “Democracy without Shortcuts,” Journal of Deliberative Democracy, Special Issue, 16.Google Scholar
Curti, Léopold (1797), Lettres sur la Suisse, vol. I, Altona: Chez Jean David Adam Eckart.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A (1970), After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A (1989), Democracy and its Critics, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalarun, Jacques (2012), Gouverner c’est servir: Essai de démocratie médiévale, Paris: Alma Éditeur.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P. (2002), Parties without Partisans: Political Changes in Advanced Industrial Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dante, (2003), The Divine Comedy: The Inferno, The Purgatorio, and The Paradiso, London: Dutton/Signe.Google Scholar
Dartmann, Christoph, Wassilowsky, Günther, and Weller, Thomas (eds.) (2010), Technik und Symbolik vormoderner Wahlverfahren (Beihefte der Historischen Zeitschrift). Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Daverio Rocchi, Giovanna (2001), “Spazi e forme del sorteggio democratico,” in Federica, Cordano, and Cristiano, Grottanelli (eds.), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et, pp. 95–106.Google Scholar
Decretum magistri Gratiani. (1879), Editio Lipsiensis secunda, post Aemilii Ludovici Richteri curas, ad librorum manu scriptorum et editionis Romanae fidem recognovit et adnotatione critica instruxit Aemilius Friedberg. Leipzig: B. Tauchnitz (Corpus iuris canonici; 1).Google Scholar
Delannoi, Gil and Dowlen, Oliver (eds.) (2010), Sortition. Theory and Practice, Exeter (UK): Imprint-Academic.Google Scholar
Déloye, Yves and Ihl, Olivier (2008), L’acte de vote, Paris: Presses de Sciences.Google Scholar
Demont, Pau (2000), “Lots héroïques: remarques sur le tirage au sort de l’Iliade aux Sept contre Thèbes,” Revue des Études Grecques, 113 (2), pp. 299–325.Google Scholar
Demont, Paul (2010), “Tirage au sort et démocratie en Grèce ancienne,” La Vie des idées, 22 June.Google Scholar
Demont, Paul (2020), “Selection by Lot in Ancient Athens: From Religion to Politics,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 112–129.Google Scholar
Desrosières, Alain (2000), La politique des grands nombres. Histoire de la raison statistique, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Destutt De Tracy, Antoine (1819), Commentaire sur l’Esprit des lois de Montesquieu, Paris: Th. Desoer.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1954), The Public and Its Problems, Athens, OH: Swallow Press/Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Di Salvatore, Massimo (2001), “Il sorteggio tra politica e religione. Un caso tessalico,” in Cordano, Federica and Grottanelli, Cristiano (eds.), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et, pp. 119–130.Google Scholar
Dick, Philip K. (1955), Solar Lottery, New York: Ace Books.Google Scholar
Dienel, Hans-Liudger (2010), “Les jurys citoyens : pourquoi sont-ils encore si rarement utilisés?” in Bacqué, Marie-Hélène and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), La démocratie participative inachevée. Genèse, adaptations et diffusions, Paris: Yves Michel, pp. 101–114.Google Scholar
Dienel, Peter (1970), “Techniken bürgerschaftlicher Beteiligung an Planungsprozessen,” Offene Welt, 101, pp. 144–156.Google Scholar
Dienel, Peter C. (1997), Die Planungszelle, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Dienel, Peter C. (2009), Demokratisch, praktisch, gut: Merkmale, Wirkungen und Perspektiven von Planungzellen und Bürgergutachte, Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
Dienel, Peter C. and Renn, Ortwin (1995), “Planning Cells: A Gate to ‘Fractal’ Mediation,” in Renn, Ortwin, Webler, Thomas, and Weidemann, Peter (eds.), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation – Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 117–140.Google Scholar
Dowlen, Oliver (2008), The Political Potential of Sortition. A Study of the Random Selection of Citizens for Public Offices, Exeter, UK/Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Druey, Henri (1828), “Essai sur les nouveaux principes politiques,” Le Nouvelliste Vaudois, 40, May 16.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John (1990), Discursive Democracy. Politics, Policy and Political Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, Laurent (1989), Inscriptions grecques dialectales de Sicile, 206, Rome: Publications de l’École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Dupuis, Aurèle (2021), “Aristocratie distributive et traditions républicaines : une histoire comparative des usages du tirage au sort en politique dans trois cantons suisses d’Ancien Régime (17e–18e siècles),” PhD thesis, Lausanne: Lausanne University.Google Scholar
Dupuis-Déri, Francis (2013), Démocratie, histoire politique d'un mot aux États-Unis et en France, Montréal: Lux.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, Victor (1923), “Losung”, in Paulys Real-Enzyklopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart, pp. 1451–1504.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (ed.) (1988), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1991), Arguing and Bargaining in Two Constituent Assemblies, New Haven, CT: Yale Law School.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (2008), “Le tirage au sort, plus juste que le choix rationnel,” July 2, 2008, https://laviedesidees.fr/Le-tirage-au-sort-plus-juste-que-le-choix-rationnel.html.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (2013), Securities Against Misrule. Juries, Assemblies, Elections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gota (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Farrar, Cynthia and Fishkin, James (2005), “Deliberative Polling. From Experiment to Community Resource,” in Gastil, John and Levine, Peter (eds.), The Deliberative Democracy Handbook, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 68–79.Google Scholar
Farrell, David, Harris, Clodagh, and Suiter, Jane (2016), “The Irish Constitutional Convention: A Case of ‘High Legitimacy’?” in Reuchamps, Min and Suiter, Jane (eds.), Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe, Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 33–52.Google Scholar
Farrell, David M., Suiter, Jane, Harri, Clodagh, and Cunningham, Kevin (2020), “The Effects of Mixed Membership in a Deliberative Forum: The Irish Constitutional Convention of 2012–2014,” Political Studies, 68 (1), pp. 54–73.Google Scholar
Felicetti, Andrea and Della Porta, Donatella (2019), “Joining Forces: The Sortition Chamber from a Social-Movement Perspective,” in Gastil, John and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.), Legislature by Lot, London: Verso, pp. 145–165.Google Scholar
Ferrer, Magín (1843), Las leyes fundamentales de la monarquía española, según fueron antiguamente y según sean en la época actual, Barcelona: Imprimería y librería de Pablo Riera.Google Scholar
Feuchtwang, Stephan (2003), “Peasants, Democracy and Anthropology: Questions of Local Loyalty,” Critique of Anthropology, 23 (1), pp. 93–120.Google Scholar
Finley, Moses I. (1991), The Invention of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Frank (2003), Reframing Public Policy, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James (1991), Democracy and Deliberation, New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James (1995), The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy, New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James (2009), When the People Speak : Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James (2015), “Reviving Deliberative Democracy: Reflections on Recent Experiments,” in Coleman, Stephen, Przybylska, Anna, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.) Deliberation: Values, Processes, Institutions, Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang, pp. 99–108.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James (2018), Democracy When the People Are Thinking: Revitalizing Our Politics Through Public Deliberation, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James, He, Baogang, Luskin, Robert C., and Siu, Alice (2010), “Deliberative Democracy in an Unlikely Place: Deliberative Polling in China,” British Journal of Political Science, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Flaig, Egon (2004), Ritualisierte Gesten. Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft im alten Rom, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.Google Scholar
Flamand, Amélie (2011), “La fabrique d’un public régional : Observation participante du premier jury citoyen en Poitou-Charentes,” in Talpin, Julien and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), La démocratie participative au-delà de la proximité : Le Poitou-Charentes et l’échelle régionale, Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
Joan, Font (2001), Ciudadanos y decisiones públicas, Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Jean-Louis, Fournel (2020), “Du parlamento au Grand conseil florentin (1494–1530). Le passage de la représentation des citoyens d’une place publique à une salle fermée,” in Hayat, Samuel, Péneau, Corinne, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), La représentation avant le gouvernement représentatif, Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, pp. 151–174.Google Scholar
Fourniau, Jean-Michel (2020), “The Selection of Deliberative Minipublics: Sortition, Motivation, and Availability,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 372–399.Google Scholar
Fourniau, Jean-Michel (2021), “Gouverner une Assemblée citoyenne? Retour sur le rôle du comité de gouvernance de la CCC,” conference “Toward Citizen-Legislators? The Case of the French Citizen’ Convention for Climate (2019–2021),” Yale University, May 19, 20, and 21.Google Scholar
Fournier, Patrick, Van Der Kolk, Henk, Carty, R. Kenneth, Blais, André, and Rose, Jonathan (2011), When Citizens Decide. Lessons from Citizens Assemblies on Electoral Reform, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (1997), “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy,” in Justice Interruptus. Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 11–40.Google Scholar
Frazer, James G. (1900), The Golden Bough, 3 vol., 2nd edition, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (2002), Civilization and Its Discontents, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis (2012) [1992], The End of History and the Last Man, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Funes, María F., Talpin, Julien, and Rull, Mathias (2014), “The Cultural Consequences of Engagement in Participatory Processes,” in Font, Joan, Della Porta, Donatella and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Local Participation in Southern Europe: Causes, Characteristics and Consequences, Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 151–189.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon (2005), “Deliberation before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World,” Political Theory, 33 (3), pp. 397–419.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.) (2003), Deepening Democracy. Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Gaborit, Maxime (2021), “The French Citizens’ Convention on Climate in its Ecosystem. Climate Democracy and Social Movements,” doctoral and postdoctoral workshop titled “Sortition in Politics: History, Sociology, Philosophy,” Oxford, February, 15.Google Scholar
Ganuza, Ernesto and Baiocchi, Gianpaolo (2012), “The Power of Ambiguity: How Participatory Budgeting Travels the Globe,” Journal of Public Deliberation, 8 (2), article 8.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio (1993), L’umanesimo italiano, Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Garrigou, Alain (1992), Le vote et la vertu. Comment les Français sont devenus électeurs, Paris: Presses de la FNSP.Google Scholar
Garrigou, Alain (2002), Histoire sociale du suffrage universel en France. 1848–2000, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Gastil, John (2000), By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy through Deliberative Elections, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gastil, John and Levine, Peter (2005), The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gastil, John and Knobloch, Katherine (2010), Evaluation Report to the Oregon State Legislature on the 2010 Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review, Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Gastil, John, Knobloch, Katherine, and Reitman, Tyrone (2015), “Connecting Micro-Deliberation to Electoral Decision-Making Institutionalizing the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative,” in Coleman, Stephen, Przybylska, Anna, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Deliberation: Values, Processes, Institutions, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
Gastil, John and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.) (2018), Politics and Society, 46 (3): Special Issue: Legislature by Lot: Transformative Designs for Deliberative Governance.Google Scholar
Gastil, John and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.) (2019a), Legislature by Lot. An Alternative Design for Deliberative Governance, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Gataker, Thomas (2008) [1619–1627], Of the Nature and Use of Lots: A Treatise Historicall and Theologicall, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Gaxie, Daniel (1978), Le cens caché, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Genro, Tarso and De Souza, Ubiratan (1997), Orçamento Participativo. A experiência de Porto Alegre, São Paulo: Editoria Fundação Perseu Abramo.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Mahatma (1968), The Selected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, ed. Narayan, Shriman, vol. V: The Voice of Truce, Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House. p. 303.Google Scholar
Giannini, Guglielmo (2002) [1945], La Folla. Seimila anni di lotta contro la tirannide, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
Giannotti, Donato (1974) [1526–1533], Della Repubblica de’ Viniziani, in Furio Diaz (ed.), Opere politiche, Milan: Marzorati, vol. I, pp. 28–152.Google Scholar
Gibson, Gordon (2007), “Deliberative Democracy and the B.C. Citizens’ Assembly,” speech delivered on February 23 2007, www.ccfd.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=409&Itemid=284 (site of the Citizens’ Centre for Freedom and Democracy).Google Scholar
Gide, André (1930), Souvenirs de la Cour d’assises, Paris: Éditions de la Nouvelle Revue française.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Swijtink, Zeno, Porter, Theodore, Daston, Lorraine, Beatty, John and Kruger, Lorenz (1989), The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life¸ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Felix (1968), “The Venetian Constitution in Florentine Political Thought,” in Rubinstein, N. (ed.), Florentine Studies. Politics and Society in Renaissance Florence. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 463–500.Google Scholar
Gillier, Dominique (2021), Rapport et recommandations du groupe de retour d’expérience de la Convention citoyenne pour le climat, Paris: CESE, MarchGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, Carlo (1990), Ecstasies, Deciphering the Witches’ Sabbath, London: Hutchinson Radius.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Carlo (2006), “Spie. Radici di un paradigmo indizario,” in Il filo e le trace. Vero, falso, finto. Milan: Feltrinelli, pp. 281–293.Google Scholar
Gissinger-Bosse, Celia (2017), Être juré populaire en cour d’assises. Faire une expérience démocratique, Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
Glotz, Gustave (2005), The Greek City and Its Institutions, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (2008), Elective Affinities: A Novel, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. and Dryzeck, John (2006), “Deliberative Impacts. The Macro-Political Uptake of Minipublics,” Politics and Society, 34 (2), pp. 219–244.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Carrington L. and Fang, Chaoying (1976), Dictionary of Ming Biography 1368–1644, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Barbara (2012), Justice by Lottery, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Goppold, Uwe (2007), Politische Kommunikation in den Städten der Vormoderne. Zürich und Münster im Vergleich, Cologne/Weimar/Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Gorz, André (1968), “Reform and Revolution,” The Socialist Register, 5, pp. 111–143, https://socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5272/2173Google Scholar
Gracia, Eugenio Benedicto (2006), “Documentos acerca del funcionamiento del sistema de insaculación en la aljama judía de Huesca (siglo XV),” Sefarad, 66 (2), pp. 309–344.Google Scholar
Green, Thomas A. (1987), “The English Criminal Trial Jury on the Eve of the French Revolution,” in Padoa Schioppa, Antonio (ed.), The Trial Jury in England, France, Germany, 1700–1900, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 41–74.Google Scholar
Gret, Marion and Sintomer, Yves (2004), The Porto Alegre Experiment: Learning Lessons for a Better Democracy, New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Grottanelli, Cristiano (1993), “Bambini e divinazione,” in Niccoli, Ottavia (ed.), Infanzie: funzioni di un gruppo liminale dal mondo classico all'eta moderna. Florence: Ponte alle Grazie, pp. 23–72.Google Scholar
Grottanelli, Cristiano (2001), “La cléromancie ancienne et le dieu Hermès,” in Cordano, Federica and Grottanelli, Cristiano (eds.), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et, pp. 155–196.Google Scholar
Gossez, Rémi (1967), Les ouvriers de Paris. Livre premier. L’organisation, 1848–1851, La Roche-sur-Yon: Imprimerie centrale de l’Ouest.Google Scholar
Gu, Yanwu (1834), Rizhi lu jishi日知錄集釋 [1670], edited by Huang Rucheng, reproduction in Sibu beiyao.Google Scholar
Gualtieri, Piero (2009), Il Comune di Firenze tra Due e Trecento, Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Gueniffey, Patrice (1993), Le nombre et la raison. La Révolution française et les élections, Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar
Guerra, François-Xavier (2009), Modernidad e independencias: Ensayos sobre las revoluciones hispánicas, Madrid: Encuentro.Google Scholar
Guha, Ranajit (ed.) (1982–1985), Subaltern Studies. Writing on South Asian History and Society, Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guicciardini, Francesco (1932), Dialogo e discorsi del reggimento di Firenze. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Guicciardini, Francesco (1984), Antimachiavelli, Rome: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar
Guicciardini, Francesco (1994), Dialogue on the Government of Florence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guicciardini, Francesco (1997), “How the Popular Government Should Be Reformed,” in Kraye, J. (ed.), Cambridge Translations of Renaissance Philosophical Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201–37.Google Scholar
Guidi, Guidubaldo (1981), Il governo della città-repubblica di Firenze del primo quattrocento, 2 vol., Florence: Leo S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Guidorizzi, Luiz (2001), Um Curso de Cálculo, Rio de Janeiro: Gen-LTC (Livros Tecnicos E Cientificos Editora).Google Scholar
Guizot, François (1821), Histoire des origines du gouvernement représentatif en Europe, Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Guston, David H. (1999), “Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of Citizens’ Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24 (4), pp. 451–482.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1975), Legitimation Crisis, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1995), “Reconciliation Through the Public use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism,” The Journal of Philosophy, 92, 3, March, pp. 109–131.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1990), The Taming of Chance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hammersley, Rachel (2005), “The Commonwealth of Oceana de James Harrington: un modèle pour la France révolutionnaire?,” Annales historiques de la Révolution française, 342, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Hammond, Marit and Smith, Graham (2017): Sustainable Prosperity and Democracy: A Research Agenda, CUSP Working Paper No 8, Guildford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Hankins, James (ed.) (2000), Renaissance Civic Humanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mogens H. (1991), Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio (2001), Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harivel, Maud (2019), Les élections politiques dans la République de Venise (XVIe–XVIIIe siècle). Entre justice distributive et corruption, Paris: Les Indes savantes, 2019.Google Scholar
Harrington, James (1977), The Political Works of James Harrington (edited by Pocock, J. G. A.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, James (1992), The Commonwealth of Oceana and A System of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, François (2015), Presentism and Experiences of Time, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hattler, Claus (2008), “…‘und es regiert der Würfelbecher’ – Glückspiel in der Antike,” in Karlsruhe, Badisches Landesmuseum, Volles Risiko! Glückspiel von der Antike bis heute. Karlsruhe: Badisches Landesmuseum Catalogue, pp. 221–241.Google Scholar
Hayat, Samuel (2014), 1848. Quand la République était révolutionnaire. Citoyenneté et représentation, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Hayat, Samuel (2018a), “Incarner le peuple souverain: les usages de la représentation-incarnation sous la Seconde République,” Raisons politiques, 72 (November), pp. 137–164.Google Scholar
Hayat, Samuel (2018b), “Les Gilets jaunes et la question démocratique,” Contretemps, December 26, www.contretemps.eu.Google Scholar
Hayat, Samuel, Péneau, Corinne, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.) (2018), Raisons politiques, thematic issue: La représentation incarnation, 72, November.Google Scholar
Hayat, Samuel (2019), “La carrière militante de la référence à Bernard Manin dans les mouvements français pour le tirage au sort,” Participations, Special issue, pp. 437–451.Google Scholar
Hayat, Samuel, Péneau, Corinne, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.) (2020), La représentation avant le gouvernement représentatif, Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
He, Baogang (2011), “Participatory Budgeting in China. An Overview,” in Sintomer, Yves, Traub-Merz, Rudolf, and Zhang, Junhua (eds.), Participatory Budgeting in Asia and Europe. Key Challenges of Deliberative Democracy, Hong Kong: Palgrave, pp. 89–101.Google Scholar
Headlam, James W. (1891) [1931], Election by lot in Athens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1952) [1821], Philosophy of Right, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1971) [1830], Philosophy of Mind, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Held, David (2006), Models of Democracy, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hendriks, Carolyn M. (2005), “Consensus Conferences and Planning Cells,” in Gastil, John and Levine, Peter (eds.), The Deliberative Democracy Handbook, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 80–110.Google Scholar
Henneman, Inge G., Bell, Christophe, Frattarola, Mirina, Van Den Broeck, Lieve, and Van Reybrouck, David (2012), G 1000, le rapport final. L’innovation démocratique mise en pratique, Brussels: Fondation pour les générations futures.Google Scholar
Henriquet, Paul (1921), “Les loteries et les emprunts à lots,” Ph.D. diss., Paris: Law Faculty, University of Paris.Google Scholar
Herath, R. B. (2007), Real Power to the People. A Novel Approach to Electoral Reform in British Columbia, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Irène (2006), “Genève (canton). La vie politique à Genève aux XIXe et XXe siècles,” in Dictionnaire historique de la Suisse. Hauterive: Gilles Attinger, pp. 460–465; 470–473.Google Scholar
Herodotus, (2008), The Histories, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric (1987), The Age of Empire: 1875–1914, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric (1994), The Age of Extremes. A History of the World, 1914–1991, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence (1992), The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Hasso (2003), Repräsentation. Studien zur Wort- und Begriffsgeschichte von der Antike bis ins 19. Jahrhundert, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Hollard, Virginie (2010), Le rituel du vote. Les assemblées romaines du peuple, Paris: Presses du CNRS.Google Scholar
Hollard, Virginie (2020), “Elections and Sortition in Ancient Rome: Was There Such a Thing as a Roman Democracy,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 130–150.Google Scholar
HOMER, (s.d.), Iliad, http://classics.mit.edu/Homer/iliad.htmlGoogle Scholar
HOMER, (s.d.), The Odyssey, http://classics.mit.edu/Homer/odyssey.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hurlet, Frédéric (2006), Le proconsul et le prince d’Auguste à Dioclétien, Bordeaux: Ansonius Editions.Google Scholar
Hurlet, Frédéric (2012), “Démocratie à Rome? Quelle démocratie? En relisant Millar (et Hölkeskamp),” in Benoist, S. (ed.), Rome, A City and Its Empire in Perspective. The Impact of the Roman World through Fergus Millar’s Research. Leiden/Boston: Brill, pp. 19–43.Google Scholar
Ingimundarson, Valur, Urfalino, Philippe, and Erlinsdottir, Irma (eds.) (2016), Iceland’s Financial Crisis: The Politics of Blame, Protest, and Reconstruction, London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Ann Katherine (2001), “Il sorteggio politico negli stati italiani fra medioevo ed età moderna,” in Cordano, Federica and Grottanelli, Cristiano (eds.), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et, pp. 139–153.Google Scholar
Ismard, Paulin (2010), La cité des réseaux. Athènes et ses associations, VIe-Ier siècle av. J.C., Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Ismard, Paulin (2015), La démocratie contre les experts. Les esclaves publics en Grèce ancienne, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Jacquet, Vincent and Reuchamps, Min (2016), “Les ‘méthodologues’ de la démocratie délibérative. Entre activisme citoyen et recherche scientifique au sein du G1000 et du G100,” Participations, 3 (16), pp. 45–65.Google Scholar
Jacquet, Vincent, Moskovic, Jonathan, Caluwaerts, Didier, and Reuchamps, Min (2016), “The Macro Political Uptake of the G1000 in Belgium,” in Reuchamps, Min and Suiter, Jane (eds.), Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe, Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 53–74.Google Scholar
Jaffrelot, Christophe (2003), India’s Silent Revolution – The Rise of the Lower Castes in North India, New York: Columbia University Press; London: Hurst; New Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien (1997), L’individu effacé ou le paradoxe du libéralisme français, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Jeanpierre, Laurent (2019), In Girum: Les leçons politiques des ronds-points, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Jehne, Martin (2010), “Die Dominanz des Vorgangs über den Ausgang. Struktur und Verlauf der Wahlen in der römischen Republik,” in Dartmann, Christoph, Wassilowsky, Günther, and Weller, Thomas (eds.), Technik und Symbolik vormoderner Wahlverfahren, Munich: Oldenbourg, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar
Joss, Simon and Bellucci, Sergio (eds.) (2003), Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives, London: Center for the Study on Democracy.Google Scholar
Joss, Simon and Durant, John (eds.) (1995), Public Participation in Science. The Role of Consensus Conference in Europe, London: Science Museum.Google Scholar
Judde De Larivière, Claire (2014), La révolte des boules de neige. Murano contre Venise, 1511, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Judde De Larivière, Claire (2020), “Ducal Elections, Institutional Usages, and Popular Practices. Drawing Lots in the Republic of Venice,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 219–234.Google Scholar
Kahane, David (2016), Thinking Systemically about Deliberative Democracy and Climate Change, London: Foundation for Democracy and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Keller, Hagen (1988), “‘Kommune’: Städtische Selbstregierung und mittelalterliche ‘Volksherrschaft’ im Spiegel italienischer Wahlverfahren des 12.-14. Jahrhunderts,” in Althoff, Gerd, Geuenich, Dieter, Oexle, Otto Gerhard, and Wollasch, Joachim (eds.), Person und Gemeinschaft im Mittelalter. Karl Schmid zum 65. Geburtstag. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke, pp. 573–616.Google Scholar
Keller, Hagen (2014), “Electoral Systems and Conceptions of Community in Italian Communes (12th–14th Centuries),” Revue française de science politique, 64 (6), English version.Google Scholar
Klein, Gérard (1968), Le sceptre du hasard, Paris: Fleuve Noir.Google Scholar
Knobloch, Katherine, Gastil, John, and Reedy, Justin (2013a), “Did They Deliberate? Applying an Evaluative Model of Democratic Deliberation to the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review,” Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41 (2), pp. 105–125.Google Scholar
Knobloch, Katherine, Gastil, John, Richards, Robert, and Feller, Traci (2013b), Evaluation Report on the 2012 Citizens’ Initiative Reviews for the Oregon CIR Commission, State College: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Köger, Annette (2008), “Spielkarten und Glückspiel,” in Landesmuseum Karlsruhe, Badisches, Volles Risiko! Glückspiel von der Antike bis heute. Karlsruhe: Badisches Landesmuseum Catalogue, pp. 268–270.Google Scholar
Konrad, George (1984), Antipolitics, San Diego, CA: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart (2004), Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Times, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, Richard (1997), “Deliberating Waste: the Hertfordshire Citizens’ Jury,” Local Environment, 2 (2), pp. 139–153.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène (2012), Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène (2015), “Inclusive Constitution-Making: The Icelandic Experiment,” The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23 (2), pp. 166–191.Google Scholar
Landemore, Helene (2020), Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-first Century, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Langbein, John H. (1987), “The English Criminal Trial Jury on the Eve of the French Revolution,” in Padoa Schioppa, Antonio (ed.), The Trial Jury in England, France, Germany, 1700–1900, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 14–40.Google Scholar
Lafont, Cristina (2020), Democracy without Shortcuts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Landa, Dimitri and Pevnick, Ryan (2021), “Is Random Selection a Cure for the Ills of Electoral Representation?”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 29 (1) pp. 46–72.Google Scholar
Lane, Frederic C. (1973), Venice: A Maritime Republic, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lang, Amy (2007), “But Is it for Real? The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly as a Model of State-Sponsored Citizen Empowerment,” Politics & Society, 35 (1), pp. 35–70.Google Scholar
Lang, Andrew (2005), Magic and Religion, New York: Cosimo Inc (London, 1901).Google Scholar
Lanthenas, François-Xavier (2013) [1792], “Des élections et du mode d’élire par listes épuratoires,” January 1792, in Kersaint, Guy (ed.), De la Constitution et du gouvernement qui pourroient convenir à la République françoise, Paris: Hachette/BNF.Google Scholar
Le Bras, Hervé (2000), Naissance de la mortalité. L’origine politique de la statistique et de la démographie, Paris: Gallimard/Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Lee, Ken and Greenstone, Michael (2021), Air Quality Life Index, Annual Update, Chicago: Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Leroux, Pierre (1848), Projet d’une constitution démocratique et sociale, Paris: Gustave André.Google Scholar
Leti, Gregorio (1697), Critique historique, politique, morale, économique et comique, sur les lotteries anciennes et modernes, spirituelles et temporelles des états et des églises, Amsterdam: Chez les amis de l’auteur.Google Scholar
Leveque, Pierre and Vidal-Naquet, Pierre (1983), Clisthène l’athénien, Paris: Macula.Google Scholar
Lévi-strauss-strauss, Claude (1952), “Le père Noël supplicié,” Les Temps modernes, March, pp. 1572–1590 (reprint: Sables, Pin-Balma, 1996).Google Scholar
Levy, David (1989), “The Statistical Basis of Athenian-American Constitutional Democracy,” The Journal of Legal Studies, 18 (1), January, pp. 79–103.Google Scholar
Levy, Leonard W. (1999), The Palladium of Justice. Origins of the Trial by Jury, Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.Google Scholar
Lignereux, Yann (2020), “The Drawing of Lots versus the State: Fate, Divine Inspiration, and the Vocation of Town Magistrates in 17th-Century France,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 235–252.Google Scholar
Lilti, Antoine (2015), The World of the Salons: Sociability and Worldliness, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lintott, Andrew (1999) The Constitution of the Roman Republic, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane (2020), “Drawing Lots in Ancient Greece. Vocabulary and Tools,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 53–94.Google Scholar
Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.) (2020), Sortition and Democracy. Practices, Tools, Theories, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Loraux, Nicole (1997), La Cité divisée, Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Loriol, Romain (2020), “Sortition and Divination in Ancient Rome. Were the Gods Involved in Casting Lots?” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 182–195.Google Scholar
Lousteau, Guillermo H., Covarrubias, Ignacio, Reyes, Xavier, and Salazar, Pedro (2012), El nuevo constitucionalismo latino-americano, The Democracy Papers, 5, InterAmerican Institute for Democracy, August.Google Scholar
Löwy, Michael (1988), Rédemption et utopie: le judaïsme libertaire en Europe centrale: une étude d’affinité élective, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lucardie, Paul (2019), “Sortitionist Experiments in the Netherlands: From noncommittal Advice to Modest Decision-Making Power,” paper presented at the conference “Le tirage au sort en politique: état des lieux et perspectives contemporaines,” Lyon, November 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Lukin, Pavel (2017), “Consensus et représentation en Russie, XIIe–XVIe siècles: une introduction,” in Genet, Jean-Philippe, Le Page, Dominique, and Mattéoni, Olivier (eds.), Consensus et représentation, Paris/Rome: Publications de la Sorbonne/Ecole française de Rome.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (2013), Legitimation durch Verfahren, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (8th ed.).Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò (1988), Florentine Histories, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò (1989), The Chief Works and Others, trans. Allan, Gilbert, Durham and London: Duke University Press, vol. II.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. (1977), Life and Times of Liberal Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Madison, James (1982), “To the People of the State of New York,” in Hamilton, A., Madison, J., and Jay, M., The Federalist Papers (1787–1788). New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Maffi, Alberto (2001), “Nomina per sorteggio degli ambasciatori nel mondo romano,” in Cordano, Federica and Grottanelli, Cristiano (ed.), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et, pp. 137–138.Google Scholar
Maire-Vigueur, Jean-Claude, and Faini, Enrico (2010), Il sistema politico dei comuni italiani (secoli XII–XIV), Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Maissen, Thomas (2006), Die Geburt der Republic. Staatsverständnis und Repräsentation in der frühneuzeitlichen Eidgenossenschaft, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Malecz, Ek, Werner (1990), “Abstimmungsarten,” in Schneider, Reinhard and Zimmermann, Harald (eds.), Wahlen und Wählen im Mittelalter, Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke, p. 130.Google Scholar
Malkin, Irad (forthcoming), Drawing Lots with Ancient Greeks: The Values of a Horizontal Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mailipiero, Domenico (1843), “Annali Veneti,” Archivio Storico Italiano, VII.Google Scholar
Mallarmé, Stéphane (1897), “Un coup de dés jamais n’abolira le hasard,” Cosmopolis, 6 (17).Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard (1987), “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation,” Political Theory, 15 (3), pp. 338–368.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard (1997), Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard (2005), “Democratic Deliberation: Why We Should Promote Debate Rather Than Discussion,” paper delivered at the Program in Ethics and Public Affairs Seminar, Princeton University, October 13: https://as.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu-as/faculty/documents/delib.pdf.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane (1999), “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’,” Journal of Politics, 61 (3), pp. 628–657.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane (2019), “Accountability and the Constituent-Representative Relationship,” in Gastil, John and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.), Legislature by Lot, London: Verso, pp. 189–204.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane and Parkinson, John (eds.) (2012), Deliberative Systems, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane et al. (2010) “Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy,” The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (1), pp. 64–100.Google Scholar
Mao, Zedong (1957), “On the Correct Handling of Contradictions among the People,” February 27: www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-5/mswv5_58.htm.Google Scholar
Mao, Zedong (1944), “Serve the People,” September 8: www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-3/mswv3_19.htm.Google Scholar
Marchione Di Coppo, Stefani (1903–1905), Cronaca Fiorentina, Rodolico, Niccolò (ed.), Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Martucci, Roberto (1997), “La robe en question: Adrien du Port et le jury criminel (29–30 mars 1790),” La Revue Tocqueville, XVIII, 2, pp. 25–47.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1907), The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1975), “Critique of Hegel’s Doctrine of the State,” Early Writings, Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Meier, Christian (1956), “Praerogativa Centuria,” in Paulys Real-Enzyklopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. Munich: Supplement volume VIII, pp. 569–598.Google Scholar
Melliet, Laurent (1628), Discours politiques et militaires sur Corneille Tacite, Lyon: Antoine Chard.Google Scholar
Mellado RodrÍguez, Joaquín (1990), “Los textos del fuero de Córdoba y la regulación de los oficios municipales,” Boletín de la Real Academia de Córdoba de Ciencias, Bellas Letras y Nobles Artes, 61 (118), pp. 9–74.Google Scholar
Mellado RodrÍguez, Joaquín (2000), “El fuero de Córdoba: edición citica y traducción,” Albor, CLXVI (654), June, pp. 191–231.Google Scholar
Mellina, Maxime (2019), “Tirage au sort et associations étudiantes: une expérience démocratique à l’université de Lausanne,” Participations, thematic issue “Le tirage au sort au XXIe siècle,” 1,(23), pp. 147–170.Google Scholar
Mellina, Maxime (2021), “Le Sort ou la Raison. Persistance et disparition du tirage au sort en Suisse (1798–1831),” 2 volumes, PhD thesis, Lausanne: Lausanne University.Google Scholar
Mellina, Maxime, Dupuis, Aurèle, and Chollet, Antoine (2020), Tirage au sort et politique. Une histoire suisse, Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.Google Scholar
Mercader I Riba, Juan (1957), “El fin de la insaculación fernandina en los municipios y gremios catalanes,” Actas del V Congreso de Historia de la Corona de Aragón, Saragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico, pp. 343–353.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert (1962), Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Michon, Pierre (1998), Le roi du bois, Paris: Verdier.Google Scholar
Milano, Lucio (2020), “Fate, Sortition, and Divine Will in Ancient Near Eastern Societies,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
Miller, Jeff (2022), Democracy in Crisis. Lessons from Ancient Athens, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Milner, Henry (2005), “Electoral Reform and Deliberative Democracy in British Columbia,” National Civic Review, 94 (1), pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
Mirabeau, Comte de (1835), “Discours devant les états de Provence,” January 30, 1789, in Œuvres VII, Paris: Lecointe et Pougain/Didier.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor (1952), Römisches Staatsrecht [1887–1888], Volume I, 41, Basel: Benne Schwab & Co.Google Scholar
Monneron, Frédéric (1800), Essai sur les nouveaux principes politiques, Lausanne: Chez Henri Vincent.Google Scholar
Monnier, Victor and Kölz, Alfred (2002), Bonaparte et la Suisse: travaux préparatoires de l’Acte de Médiation (1803): Procès-verbal des assemblées générales des députés helvétiques et des opérations de la Commission nommée par le Premier Consul pour conférer avec eux, Geneva: Helbing & Lichtenhahn.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, (1721), Persian Letters, https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Persian_LettersGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, (1949) [1748], The Spirit of the Laws, New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Moreno Pestaña, José Luis (2019), Retorno a Atenas. La democracia como principio antioligárquico, Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Moser, Friedrich Carl von (1774), “Gebrauch des Looses in Staats-Sachen,” Juristisches Wochenblatt, 3, August, pp. 615–652.Google Scholar
Moulin, Leo (1998), “Les origines religieuses des techniques électorales et délibératives modernes,” Politix, Vol. 11 (43), pp. 117–162.Google Scholar
Mowbray, Miranda and Gollmann, Dieter (2007), “Electing the Doge of Venice: Analysis of a 13th-Century Protocol,” IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium, July 6–8, Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
Mueller, Denis C., Tollison, Robert D., and Willet, Thomas (1972), “Representative Democracy via Random Selection,” Public Choice, 12, pp. 57–68.Google Scholar
Muir, Edward (1981), Civic Ritual in Renaissance Venice, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner (2017), What Is Populism?, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nagy, Agnès A., Prescendi, Francesca (eds.) (2013), Sacrifices humains: discours et réalités, Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Najemy, John N. (1982), Corporatism and Consensus in Florentine Electoral Politics, 1280–1400, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Näther, Ulrike (2008), “‘Das Große Los’ – Lotterie und Zahlenlotto,” in Badisches Landesmuseum Catalogue, Volles Risiko! Glückspiel von der Antike bis heute, Karlsruhe: Badisches Landesmuseum Catalogue, pp. 277–283.Google Scholar
Nicolet, Claude and Azedine, Beschaouch (1991), “Nouvelles observations sur la ‘Mosaïque des chevaux’ et son édifice à Carthage,” in Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres. 135rd year (3), pp. 471–507.Google Scholar
Niessen, Christoph and Reuchamps, Min (2019), Designing a Permanent Deliberative Dialogue: The Ostbelgien Modell in Belgium, Canberra: University of Canberra, Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global, Working Paper Series, 2019/6.Google Scholar
Nilsson, Martin Persson (1923), “Saturnalia,” in Wissowa, Georg, Pauly, August, Kroll, GeWilhelm, Witte, Kurt, Mittelhaus, Karl, and Ziegler, Konrat (eds.), Paulys Real-Enzyklopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 1923.Google Scholar
Norwich, John Julius. (1982), A History of Venice, Penguin: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah (2008), Democracy and Knowledge: Learning and Innovation in Classical Athens, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah (2015), The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah (2021), “Classical Athens As an Epistemic Democracy,” in Piovan, Dino and Giorgini, Giovanni (eds.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Athenian Democracy. From the Late Middle Ages to the Contemporary Era, Leiden/Boston: Brill, pp. 453–489.Google Scholar
Ochs, Peter (1797), Geschichte der Stadt und Landschaft Basel, vol. 7, Basel: Schweizhauserschen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Ochs, Peter (1937), “Note sur l’intervention du sort” [1802], in Steiner, Gustav (ed.), Korrespondenz des Peter Ochs (1752–1821), vol. 3, Ausgang der Helvetik, Mediation und Restauration. 1800–1821, Basel: von Emil Birkhäuser & Cie, pp. 73–75.Google Scholar
Odonkhuu, Munkhsaikhan (2017), “Mongolia’s (Flawed) Experiment with Deliberative Polling in Constitutional Reform,” 29 June 2017: www.constitutionnet.org/news/mongolias-flawed-experiment-deliberative-polling-constitutional-reform.Google Scholar
OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions. Catching the Deliberative Wave, Paris: OECD Publishing: https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus (1987), “Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics: Social Movements since the 1960s,” in Maier, Charles S. (ed.), Changing Boundaries of the Political (Essays on the Evolving Balance Between the State and Society, Public and Private in Europe). New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–105.Google Scholar
Offerlé, Michel (2002), Un homme, une voix ? Histoire du suffrage universel, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, A. L. (1977) Ancient Mesopotamia. Portrait of a Dead Civilization, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Osterhammel, Jürgen (2013), Die Verwandlung der Welt, Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts, Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Ostrogorski, Mosei (1902), Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties, 2 vols., New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Owen, David and Smith, Graham (2019), “Sortition, Rotation, and Mandate: Conditions for Political Equality and Deliberative Reasoning,” in Gastil, John and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.), Legislature by Lot, London: Verso, pp. 3–38.Google Scholar
Palmer, C. J. (1856), The History of Great Yarmouth, Yarmouth/London: L.A. Mead & Russel-Smith.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Yannis (1998), Démocratie directe, Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Pardieu, Esuirou de (1865), Trattato delle imposte considerate sotto l’aspetto storico, economico e politico in Francia ed all’estero, Turin: Stamperia dell’unione tipografico-editrice.Google Scholar
Parmentier, Léon (1987), “Le roi des Saturnales,” Revue de Philologie, 21, pp. 143–153.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Pasquale (2010), “Democracy Ancient and Modern: Divided Power,” in Hansen, Mogens H.. (ed.) Démocratie athénienne – démocratie moderne: tradition et influences. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pech, Thierry (2021), Le Parlement des citoyens. La convention citoyenne pour le climat, Paris: Seuil/La République des idées.Google Scholar
Pestre, Dominique (2003), Science, Argent et Politique, Paris: INRA éditions.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne (1995), The Politics of Presence, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, Frederick P. (1980), “Notes on Fate and Fortune,” in Essays on Medieval German Literature and Iconography, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 95–109.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas (2014), Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pilet, Jean-Benoit, Bedock, Camille, and Vandamme, Pierre-Etienne (eds.) (2021), “Improving, Bypassing or Overcoming Representation?”, Frontiers in Political Science, December.Google Scholar
Pillinger, Renate (1988), Das Martyrium des Heiligen Dasius, Vienna: Österreichchische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Piovan, Dino and Giorgini, Giovanni (eds.) (2020), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Athenian Democracy. From the Late Middle Ages to the Contemporary Era, Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Pirenne, Henri (1939), Les villes et les institutions urbaines, Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah (1972), The Concept of Representation, Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
PLATO (s.d.1), Laws, http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/laws.htmlGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1975), The Machiavellian Moment. Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Podlech, Adalbert (2004), “Repräsentation,” in Koselleck, R., Conze, W., and Bruner, O. (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland (vol. 5). Stuttgart: Ernst Klett, pp. 509–547.Google Scholar
Poertner, Mathias (in press), “Does Political Representation Increase Participation? Evidence from Party Candidate Lotteries in Mexico,” American Political Science Review.Google Scholar
Polo MartÍn, Regina (1999), “Los Reyes Católicos y la insaculación en Castilla,” Studia historica. Historia medieval, 17, pp. 137–197.Google Scholar
Polybius, (1922), Histories, Book VI: “The Roman Military System,” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, Kenneth (2001), The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Prescendi, Francesca (2013), “Du sacrifice du roi des Saturnales à l’exécution de Jésus,” in Nagy, Agnès A. and Prescendi, Francesca (eds.), Sacrifices humains: discours et réalités, Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 231–247.Google Scholar
Pudal, Bernard (1989), Prendre parti. Pour une sociologie historique du PCF, Paris: Presses de la FNSP.Google Scholar
Raines, Dorit (1991), “Office Seeking, broglio, and the Pocket Political Guidebooks in cinquecento and seicento Venice,” Studi veneziani, XXII, pp. 137–194.Google Scholar
Ramaswamy, Vijaya (2017), Historical Dictionary of the Tamils, New Delhi: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rambert, Eugène (1889), Études historiques et nationales, Lausanne: Librairie F. Rouge.Google Scholar
Ramble, Charles (2008), The Navel of the Demoness: Tibetan Buddhism and Civil Religion in Highland Nepal, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rana, Aziz (2014), The Two Faces of American Freedom, Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques (2009), Hatred of Democracy, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1995), “Political Liberalism: Reply to Habermas,” The Journal of Philosophy, 92 (3), March, pp. 132–180.Google Scholar
Read, Rupert (2012), Guardians of the Future. A Constitutional Case for Representing and Protecting Future People, Weymouth: Green House.Google Scholar
Reglá, Juan (1972), Temas medievales, Valencia: Anúbar.Google Scholar
Robespierre, Maximilien de (1791), Principes de l’organisation des jurés et réfutation du système proposé par M. Duport au nom des comités de judicature et de constitution, Paris, January 20.Google Scholar
Röcke, Anja (2005), Losverfahren und Demokratie. Historische und demokratietheoretische Perspektiven, Munster: LIT.Google Scholar
Röcke, Anja and Sintomer, Yves (2005), “Les jurys de citoyens berlinois et le tirage au sort,” in Bacqué, Marie-Hélène, Rey, Henry, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Gestion de proximité et démocratie participative, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 139–160.Google Scholar
Rocquain, Félix (1880), “Les sorts des saints ou des apôtres,” Bibliothèque de l’école des chartes, 41, pp. 457–474.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre (1992), Le Sacre du citoyen. Histoire du suffrage universel en France, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre (1998), Le peuple introuvable. Histoire de la représentation démocratique en France, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre (2000), La Démocratie inachevée. Histoire de la souveraineté du peuple en France, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre (2008), Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre (2011), Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, Nathan (1995), “Sorting Out the Lot in Republican Rome,” The American Journal of Philology, 116 (1), pp. 43–75.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent and Wong, R. Bin (2011), Before and Beyond Divergence, Cambridge, MA/London, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1978) [1762], On the Social Contract, New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Nicolai (ed.) (1968), Florentine Studies. Politics and Society in Renaissance Florence, London: Faber.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Nicolai (1986), “Florentina libertas,” Rinascimento, Florence: Leo S. Olschki, second series, vol. XXVI.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Nicolai (1997), The Government of Florence Under the Medici (1434 to 1494), Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Nicolai (2015), “The Early Years of Florence’s Grand Council (1494–1499),” Revue française de science politique, 64 (6), pp. 1157–1186.Google Scholar
Réckleben, Gisela (1969) “Rat und Bürgerschaft in Hamburg 1595–1686. Innere Bindungen und Gegensätze,” PhD thesis, Marburg University.Google Scholar
Ruffini, Edoardo (1977), “I Sistemi di deliberazione collettiva nel medioevo italiano,” in La ragione dei più. Ricerche sulla storia del principio magoritario, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 220–316.Google Scholar
Ruzé, Françoise (1997), Délibération et pouvoir dans la cité grecque de Nestor à Socrate, Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Saint, Augustine, (1909) [397–400], The Confessions of Saint Augustine, Edinburgh: PF Collier & Sons.Google Scholar
Sallust, (1921), Sallust,Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Jordi (ed.) (2000), Participació ciutadana i govern local: els Consells Ciutadans, Barcelona: Mediterrània.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (ed.) (2005), Democratizing Democracy. Beyond the Liberal Democratic Canon, London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Schädler, Ulrich (2008), “Von der Kunst des Würfelns,” in Volles Risiko! Glückspiel von der Antike bis heute. Karlsruhe: Badisches Landesmuseum Catalogue, pp. 221–241.Google Scholar
Schemiel, Yves (1999), La politique dans l’ancien Orient, Paris: Presses de Science Po.Google Scholar
Schioppa, Antonio Padoa (1987), The Trial Jury in England, France, Germany, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Schläppi, Daniel (2007), “Das Staatswesen als kollektives Gut: Gemeinbesitz als Grundlage der politischen Kultur in der frühneuzeitlichen Eidgenossenschaft,” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, Special Issue, p. 169–202.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. and Trechsel, Alexander H. (2004), The Future of Democracy in Europe, A Green Paper for the Council of Europe. Brussells: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Schnapper, Bernard (1987), “Le jury français aux XIXe et XXe siècles,” in Padoa Schioppa, Antonio (ed.), The Trial Jury in England, France, Germany, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 165–240.Google Scholar
Schneider, Reinhard and Zimmermann, Harald (eds.) (1990), Wahlen und Wählen im Mittelalter, Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Maria Dagmar (2008), “Würfelglück im Mittelalter,” in Landesmuseum Catalogue, Badisches, Volles Risiko! Glückspiel von der Antike bis heute, Karlsruhe: Badisches Landesmuseum Catalogue, pp. 255–267.Google Scholar
Sclove, Richard (1995), Democracy and Technology, New York and London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. (2009), The Art of Not Being Governed. An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia, New Haven CT/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Serafin Castro, Alexei Daniel (2019), “Représentation politique et usage du tirage au sort au Mexique (1808–1857),” Participations, special issue: Tirage au sort et démocratie: Histoire, instruments, théorie, pp. 283–299.Google Scholar
Sesma, José Ángel (1978), La Diputación del reino de Aragón en la época de Fernando II (1479–1516), Zaragoza: Imprenta librería general.Google Scholar
Shah, Alpa (2010), In the Shadows of the State. Indigenous politics, Environmentalism, and Insurgency in Jharkhand, India, Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Shah, Alpa (2020), “What if We Selected our Leaders by Lottery? Democracy by Sortition, Liberal Elections and Communist Revolutionaries,” Development Change Distinguished Lecture 2020, The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.Google Scholar
Shen, Defu (1997), Wanli yehuo bian 萬歷野獲編 [1606], Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Shī, NÀi’ān (2010), The Water Margin: Outlaws of the Marsh, North Clarendon: Tuttle Publishing.Google Scholar
Sieyes, Emmanuel-Joseph (1985), Ecrits politiques, Paris: Édition des archives contemporaines.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves (1999), La démocratie impossible? Politique et modernité chez Weber et Habermas, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves (2002), “Empujar los limites de la democracia participativa?” in Verle, João and Brunet, Luciano (eds.), Costruindo um Novo Mundo. Avaliação da experiência do Orçamento Participativo em Porto Alegre, Brasil. Porto Alegre: Guayi, pp. 57–67.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves (2007), Le pouvoir au peuple. Jurys citoyens, tirage au sort et démocratie participative, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves (2008), “Du savoir d’usage au métier de citoyen?” Raisons politiques, 31, pp. 115–134.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves (2010), “Random Selection, Republican Self-Government, and Deliberative Democracy,” Constellations, 17 (3), pp. 472–487.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves (2011), “Délibération et participation: affinité élective ou concepts en tension?” Participations, 1, pp. 239–276.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves (2014a), “Prendre les décisions autrement. Réflexions à partir des conférences de citoyens,” in Rosanvallon, Pierre (ed.), Science et démocratie. Paris: Odile Jacob, pp. 239–263.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves (2014b), “The Meanings of Political Representation: Uses and Misuses of a Notion,” Raisons politiques, English edition, pp. 13–34.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves (2018), “A Child Drawing Lots: The ‘Pathos Formula’ of Political Sortition?” in Chollet, Antoine and Fontaine, Alexandre (eds.), Expériences du tirage au sort en Suisse et en Europe, Bern: Publications en série de la bibliothèque Am Guisanplatz, 74, pp. 223–256.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves (2021), “Sortition and Politics: From Radical to Deliberative Democracy ̶ and Back?” in Piovan, Dino and Giorgini, Giovanni (eds.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Athenian Democracy, Leiden: Brill, pp. 490–521.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves (2022), “Un Parlement des citoyens pour la démocratie du 21e siècle,” January 10, https://tnova.fr/democratie/nouvelles-pratiques-democratiques/un-parlement-des-citoyens-pour-la-democratie-du-21e-siecle/.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves, Herzberg, Carsten, and Röcke, Anja (2016), Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Democracy and Public Governance, London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sirmans, M. Eugene (1966), Colonial South Carolina – A Political History. 1663–1763, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1978), The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Graham (2009), Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation, Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Graham (2021), Can Democracy Safeguard the Future?, Cambridge/Medford USA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Graham and Wales, Corinne (1999), “The Theory and Practice of Citizens’ Juries,” Policy & Politics, 27 (3), pp. 295–308.Google Scholar
Soto, Pablo (2018), “Oui, on peut concilier démocratie radicale et gestion efficace,” Mouvements, 2 (94), pp. 66–74.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (1670), Tractatus Theologico-Politicus.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (1675–76), Tractatus Politicus.Google Scholar
Stanyan, Abraham (1714), An Account of Switzerland, Written in the Year 1714, London: Jacob Tonson.Google Scholar
Stappert, André (2016), “Organizierter Zufall” in zeremonialisierten Verfahren? Das Los bei der Ämterbesetzung an der Universität Rostock in dem Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit,” Master’s thesis, Munster: Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.Google Scholar
Stappert, André (2018), “Aller Unrichtigkeit, Verdacht und Argwohniger Reden vurzubouwen,” in Chollet, Antoine and Fontaine, Alexandre (eds.), Expériences du tirage au sort en Suisse et en Europe, Bern: Publications en série de la bibliothèque Am Guisanplatz, 74, pp. 91–117.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco R. `bächtiger, André, Pedrini, Seraina, and Gautschi, Thomas (2015), “Information, Deliberation, and Direct Democracy: Evidence from the Swiss Expulsion Initiative,” in Coleman, Stephen, Przybylska, Anna, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Deliberation: Values, Processes, Institutions, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 187–204.Google Scholar
Stefanoni, Pablo (2016), “Balance 2016. América Latina: más híbrida que refundacional,” La nación, December 18.Google Scholar
Stella, Alessandro (1993), La révolte des Ciompi, Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS.Google Scholar
Stewart, John, Kendall, Elizabeth, and Coote, Anna (1994), Citizens’ Juries, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Stewart, Roberta (1998), Public Office in Early Rome. Ritual Procedure and Political Practice, Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara (1999), Vormünder des Volkes? Konzepte landständischer Repräsentation in der Spätphase des Alten Reiches, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara (2001), “Einleitung,” in Stollerg-Rillinger, Barbara (ed.), Vormoderne politische Verfahren, Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung, Beiheft 25, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara (2014a), “Entscheidung durch das Los. Vom praktischen Umgang mit Unverfügbarkeit in der Frühen Neuzeit,” in Brodocz, André, Herrmann, Dietrich, Schmidt, Rainer, Schulz, Daniel, and Wessel, Julia Schulze (eds.), Die Verfassung des politischen. Festschrift für Hans Vorländer. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 63–79.Google Scholar
Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara (2014b), “Um das Leben Würfeln. Losentscheidung, Kriegsrecht und inszenierte Willkür in der frühen Neuen Zeit,” Historische Anthropologie, 22 (2), pp. 182–209.Google Scholar
Stone, Peter (2009), “The Logic of Random Selection,” Political Theory, 37 (3), pp. 375–397.Google Scholar
Straw, Joseph (2002), “Se discutono e leggono i dossier cambiano idea,” Reset, 71, May–June.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang (2016), How Will Capitalism End? Essays on a Failing System, London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Stuart Staveley, Eastland (1972), Greek and Roman Voting and Elections, London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Sun, Hong (1702), Weizheng diyi bian (Manual of Government, First Installment).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (1999), The Law of Group Polarization, John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper, 91.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Keith (2004), The Party’s Over, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Talpin, Julien (2011), Schools of Democracy. How Ordinary Citizens (Sometimes) Become More Competent in Participatory Budgeting Institutions, Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Talpin, Julien (2020), “Does Random Selection Make Democracy More Democratic? How Deliberative Democracy Has Depoliticized a Radical Proposal,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 442–464.Google Scholar
Tanzini, Lorenzo (2014), A consiglio. La vita politica nell’Italia dei comuni, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Tanzini, Lorenzo (2020), “The Practices and Rhetoric of Sortition in Medieval Public Life (13th–14th Centuries),” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 201–218.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (2004), Modern Social Imaginaries, Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Lily Ross (1966), Roman Voting Assemblies from the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar, Ann Harbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Tschudi, Johann Heinrich (1714), Beschreibung des Lobl. Orths und Lands Glarus, Zurich: Lindinners.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1963), The Making of the English Working Class, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Thompson, Nivek K. (2012), “Participatory Budgeting – The Australian Way,” Journal of Public Deliberation, 8 (2), article 5.Google Scholar
Thucydides, (1954), The Peloponnesian War, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tilikete, Selma (2020), “Entre technique et politique: la fabrique des propositions de la convention citoyenne pour le climat,” Master’s thesis, Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de (1899) [1835], Democracy in America, vol. 1, New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Torras I Ribé, Josep M. (1983), Els municips catalans de l’Antic Règim (1453–1808). Procediments electorals, òrgans de poder i grups dominants, Documents de cultura, 18, Barcelona: Curial.Google Scholar
Torras I Ribé, Josep M. (1983), “El procediment electoral per insaculació en el municipi d’Igualada (1483–1714),” Miscellanea Aqualatensia, 3, pp. 101–131.Google Scholar
UNHCR (2021), Figures at a Glance, http://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia and Vandelli, Luciano (2020), La democrazia del sorteggio, Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Urfalino, Philippe (2014), “The Rule of Non-Opposition: Opening Up Decision-Making by Consensus,” The Journal of Political Philosophy, 22 (3), pp. 320–341.Google Scholar
Urfalino, Philippe (2021), Décider ensemble. La fabrique de l’obligation collective, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Usteri, Paul, Conrad, Hans, and De La Linth, Escher (1798), “Soll, um Intrigen zu vermeiden, das Loos bei einigen der wichtigsten Wahlen eingeführt werden?” Der schweizerische Republikaner, 1, January, pp. 58–59.Google Scholar
Van Reybrouck, David (2016), Against Elections, New York: Seven Stories Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Vandamme, Pierre-Etienne (2021), “Tirage au sort et conscience des injustices,” Raisons politiques, 82, May, pp. 107–124.Google Scholar
Vegetti Finzi, Silvia (1992), “Female Identity Between Sexuality and Maternity,” in Bock, G. and James, S. (eds.), Beyond Equality and Difference. London: Routledge, pp. 126–148.Google Scholar
Verderami, Francesco (2008), “Giustizia, piano di Berlusconi: giuria popolare nei casi gravi,” Il Corriere della sera, February 8Google Scholar
Vergne, Antoine (2005), “La Lutte contre la corruption internationale grâce à l’utilisation raisonnée du tirage au sort,” Master’s thesis, Toulouse: Institut d’Études Politiques.Google Scholar
Vernant, Jean-Pierre (1983), Les origines de la pensée grecque, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Villaceque, Noémie (2013), Spectateurs de paroles ! Délibération démocratique et théâtre à Athènes à l’époque classique, Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Villani, Giovanni (2001), Nuova Cronica, Porta, Giuseppe (ed.), Parma: Guanda.Google Scholar
Vives, Jaume Vicens (1936–1937), Ferran II i la ciutat de Barcelona (1479–1516), 3 volumes, Barcelona: Universitat de Catalunya.Google Scholar
Vives, José S. (ed.) (1963), Concilios Visigóticos e hispano-romanos, Barcelona/Madrid: CSIC/ Enrique Flórez Institute.Google Scholar
Von Haller, Karl Ludwig (1834), “Fortsetzung der Constitutions-Gesetze 3. Kluge Wahl-Formen,” in Restauration der Staats-Wissenschaft oder Theorie des natürlichgeselligen Zustands der Chimäre des künstlich-bürgerlichen entgegengesezt, Winterthur: Steinerischen Buchandlung, vol. 6.Google Scholar
Voutat, Bernard (2005), “A propos de la démocratie directe. L’exemple helvétique,” in Bacqué, Marie-Hélène, Rey, Henri, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Gestion de proximité et démocratie participative. Paris: La Découverte, pp. 197–216.Google Scholar
Wang, Shaoguang (2018), Sortition, Democracy, and Republic: From Athens to Venice, Beijing: CITIC Press [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Warburg, Aby (1990), Essais florentins, Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E. and Pearse, Hilary (eds.) (2008), Designing Deliberative Democracy. The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1966), The City, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1994), Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (2010), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Nadir (2018), “Gott würfelt nicht. Losverfahren und Kontingenzbewältigung in der Republik Bern (17. und 18. Jahrhundert),” in Chollet, Antoine and Fontaine, Alexandre (eds.), Expériences du tirage au sort en Suisse et en Europe, Bern: Publications en série de la bibliothèque Am Guisanplatz, 74, pp. 47–68.Google Scholar
Weller, Thomas (2010), “Repräsentation per Losentscheid. Wahl und Auswahlverfahren der procuradores de Cortes in den kastilischen Städten der Frühen Neuzeit,” in Dartmann, Christoph, Wassilowsky, Günther, and Weller, Thomas (eds.), Technik und Symbolik vormoderner Wahlverfahren, Munich: Oldenbourg, pp. 117–138.Google Scholar
Wendland, Paul (1898), “Jesus als Saturnalien-Koenig,” Hermes, 33, pp. 175–1.Google Scholar
Will, Pierre-Étienne (2020), “Appointing Officials by drawing lots in late Imperial China,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy. Practices, Tools, Theories, Exeter: Imprint Academic, pp. 305–340Google Scholar
Wykes, Alan (1964), Gambling, London: Aldus Books/W. H. Allen.Google Scholar
Wissowa, Georg (1971) [1912], Religion und Kultus der Römer, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Wölk, Monika (1984), “Wahlbewusstsein und Wahlerfahrung zwischen Tradition und Moderne,” Historische Zeitschrift, 238 (1), pp. 311–352.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon S. (1991), The Radicalism of the American Revolution, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin (2010), Envisioning Real Utopias, London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin (2019), “Postscript: The Anticapitalist Argument for Sortition,” in Gastil, John and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.), Legislature by Lot, London: Verso, pp. 39–49.Google Scholar
Xenophon, (2013), Memorabilia, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris M. (1990), Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Yves Sintomer, Institut Universitaire de France
  • Book: The Government of Chance
  • Online publication: 18 February 2023
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Yves Sintomer, Institut Universitaire de France
  • Book: The Government of Chance
  • Online publication: 18 February 2023
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Yves Sintomer, Institut Universitaire de France
  • Book: The Government of Chance
  • Online publication: 18 February 2023
Available formats
×