Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:01:27.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Expressive German Adjective and Noun Compounds in Aggressive Discourse

Morphopragmatic and Sociolinguistic Evidence from Austrian Corpora

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2022

Natalia Knoblock
Affiliation:
Saginaw Valley State University, Michigan
Get access

Summary

In this morphopragmatic and sociolinguistic contribution, the use of expressive German adjective and noun compounds is investigated in two Austrian corpora, an oral corpus of informal conversations among adults of different sociodemographic backgrounds and a written newspaper corpus. For the qualitative analysis, the study differentiates between direct and indirect aggressive discourse. Although sets of compounds with identical second adjective constituent are denotatively synonymic, the denotative meaning of the second constituent, whereas the first constituent has largely lost its denotative in favour of connotative meaning. Therefore, there is no lexical blocking among the sets of adjectival compounds which have changed into morphopragmatic semiprefixations. Quantitative results show that pejorative expressive compounds are more frequent than meliorative ones. Expressive noun compounds are more frequent in aggressive discourse, although expressive adjective compounds have a higher overall frequency. In informal conversations, direct insults and self-insults are rare, but indirect negative assessments of other persons and complaints about awkward situations prevail. A gender trend indicates that women use slightly fewer negative expressive compounds than men, and an SES effect shows that participants with lower educational levels use fewer positive expressive compounds.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Grammar of Hate
Morphosyntactic Features of Hateful, Aggressive, and Dehumanizing Discourse
, pp. 197 - 221
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ascoop, K. and Leuschner, T. (2006). Affixoidhungrig? Skitbra! Comparing Affixoids in German and Swedish. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59(3), 241252.Google Scholar
Baron, R. A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 73(2), 199207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in the Struggle for Power. In: Bousfield, Derek and Locher, Miriam (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 127153.Google Scholar
Brookes, G. and McEnery, T. (2020). Correlation, collocation and cohesion: A corpus-based critical analysis of violent jihadist discourse. Discourse and Society 31, 351373.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. and Schwenter, S. (2013). Pragmatics and Variationist Sociolinguistics. In: Bayley, Robert, Cameron, Richard, and Lucas, Ceil (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 464483.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. and Trudgill, P. (1998). Dialectology. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, S. (2006). Compound adjectives in English: A descriptive approach to their morphology and functions. University of Pisa: PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25, 349367.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2010). Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 32323245.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., Iganski, P., and Sweiry, A. (2017). Linguistic impoliteness and religiously aggravated hate crime in England and Wales. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5, 129.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. and Merlini Barbaresi, L. (1994). Morphopragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. and Merlini Barbaresi, L. (2017). Pragmatics and Morphology: Morphopragmatics. In: Huang, Y (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 493510.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Merlini Barbaresi, L., Schwaiger, S., Ransmayr, J., and Sommer-Lolei, S. (2019). Rivalry and Lack of Blocking among Italian and German Diminutives in Adult and Child Language. In: Rainer, Franz, Gardani, Francesco, and Dressler, Wolfgang U. (eds.), Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 123143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. (2003). On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grandi, N. and Körtvélyessy, L. (eds.) (2015). Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Graumann, C.-F. and Wintermantel, M. (2007). Diskriminierende Sprechakte: Ein funktionaler Ansatz. In: Herrmann, S. et al. (eds.), Verletzende Worte: Die Grammatik sprachlicher Missachtung. Berlin: Transcript, 147178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havryliv, O. (2009). Verbale Aggression: Formen und Funktionen am Beispiel des Wienerischen. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Havryliv, O. (2017). Verbale Aggression: Das Spektrum der Funktionen. Linguistik Online 82 (3), 27.Google Scholar
Havryliv, O. (2018). Scatologisms in aggressive speech acts. Zagreber germanistische Beiträge 27, 2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, S. K., Krämer, S., and Kuch, H. (eds.) (2007). Verletzende Worte: Die Grammatik sprachlicher Missachtung. Berlin: Transcript.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and Poetics. In: Sebeok, Τ. Α (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press, 350377 [= Jakobson (1981). Selected Writings III: Poetry of Grammar and Grammar of Poetry. The Hague: Mouton, 18–51].Google Scholar
Kałasznik, M. (2018). Pejorative Metaphern im Flüchtlingsdiskurs. In: Klinker, F. et al. (eds.), Sprachliche Gewaltformen und Effekte von Pejorisierung, verbaler Aggression und Hassrede. Stuttgart: Metzler, 6780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, F. (1998). Morphology and Pragmatics. In: Spencer, A. and Zwicky, A. M. (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 272280.Google Scholar
Klara, L. (2009). Ist steinreich auch steinreich? Adjektivische Steigerungskomposita des Gegenwartsdeutschen und ihre Akzentuierung. Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich: PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Klinker, F., Scharloth, J., and Szcęk, J. (eds.) (2018a). Sprachliche Gewaltformen und Effekte von Pejorisierung, verbaler Aggression und Hassrede. Stuttgart: Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinker, F., Scharloth, J., and Szcęk, J. (2018b). Editorial. In: Klinker, F. et al. (eds.), Sprachliche Gewaltformen und Effekte von Pejorisierung, verbaler Aggression und Hassrede. Stuttgart: Metzler, 16.Google Scholar
König, E. and Stathi, K. (2010). Gewalt durch Sprache: Grundlagen und Manifestationen. In: Krämer, S. and Koch, E. (eds.), Gewalt in der Sprache: Rhetoriken verletzenden Sprechens, Munich: Fink, 4559.Google Scholar
Korecky-Kröll, K. (2017a). Kodierung und Analyse mit CHILDES: Erfahrungen mit kindersprachlichen Spontansprachkorpora und erste Arbeiten zu einem rein erwachsenensprachlichen Spontansprachkorpus. In: Resch, Claudia and Dressler, Wolfgang U. (eds.), Digitale Methoden der Korpusforschung in Österreich. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, 85113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korecky-Kröll, K. (2017b). Encouragements and discouragements in parental input: Evidence from high and low SES families. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 13(3), 576589.Google Scholar
Korecky-Kröll, K. (2021). Requests in First Language Acquisition of German: Evidence from High and Low SES Families. In: Stephany, Ursula and Aksu-Koç, Ayhan (eds.), Development of Modality in First Language Acquisition, Studies on Language Acquisition 54. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter, 2577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, S. and Koch, E. (eds.) (2010). Gewalt in der Sprache: Rhetoriken verletzenden Sprechens. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Lenz, A. N. (2018). The special research programme ‘German in Austria: Variation – Contact – Perception’. Sociolinguistica 32(1), 269277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H. (1969). The Categories and Types of Present Day English Word- Formation. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. (2006). Swearing in English: Bad Language, Purity and Power from 1586 to the Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meibauer, J. (2013a). Expressive compounds in German. Word Structure 6, 2142.Google Scholar
Meibauer, J. (ed.) (2013b). Hassrede/Aggressive Discourse: Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu einer aktuellen Diskussion. Gießner elektronische Bibliothek. http://dnb.d-nb.de.Google Scholar
Meibauer, J. (2013c). Hassrede – von der Sprache zur Politik. In: J. Meibauer (ed.), Hassrede/Aggressive Discourse: Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu einer aktuellen Diskussion. Gießner elektronische Bibliothek, 116. http://dnb.d-nb.de.Google Scholar
Meibauer, J. (2016). Slurring as Insulting. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 145165.Google Scholar
Merlini Barbaresi, L. (2009). Linguaggio intemperante e linguaggio temperato: Ovvero intensificazione arrogante e attenuazione cortese. In: Fivela, Barbara Gili and Carla, Bazzanella (eds.), Fenomeni di intensità nell’italiano parlato. Florence: Franco Cesati Editore, 5978.Google Scholar
Merlini Barbaresi, L. and Dressler, W. U. (2020). Pragmatic Explanations in Morphology. In: Pirrelli, Vito, Plag, Ingo, and Dressler, Wolfgang U. (eds.), Word Knowledge and Word Usage: A Cross-Disciplinary Guide to the Mental Lexicon. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Ransmayr, J. (2018). Austrian Media Corpus. In: Börner, Ingo, Straub, Wolfgang, and Christian, Zolles (eds.), Germanistik Digital: Digital Humanities in der Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. Vienna: Facultas, 168182.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. and Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharpe, D. (2015). Your chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what? Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 20(8) (April 2015), 110.Google Scholar
Staley, L. (2018). Socioeconomic Pragmatic Variation: Speech Acts and Address Forms in Context. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staniewski, P. (2018). Olfaktorischer Wortschatz und dessen invektives Potenzial – Eine exemplarische Korpusanalyse. In: F. Klinker et al. (eds.), Sprachliche Gewaltformen und Effekte von Pejorisierung, verbaler Aggression und Hassrede. Stuttgart: Metzler, 135154.Google Scholar
Stratton, J. M. (2020). Adjective intensifiers in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 32(2), 183215.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×