Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:55:39.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Novel treatment strategies for targeting genetic changes in endometrial cancer

from SECTION 1 - BIOLOGY OF GYNAECOLOGICAL CANCERS: OUR CURRENT UNDERSTANDING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

Susana Banerjee
Affiliation:
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Sean Kehoe
Affiliation:
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
Richard J. Edmondson
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Martin Gore
Affiliation:
Institute of Cancer Research, London
Iain A. McNeish
Affiliation:
Barts and The London School of Medicine, London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological malignancy in Europe and the USA and the fourth most common cancer in women in the UK. In 2007, 7536 cases of endometrial cancer were diagnosed (approximately 5% of all female cancers) and 1741 deaths in 2008 were attributed to the disease, accounting for 2.3% of all deaths from malignancy in women. In the USA, approximately 42200 cases are diagnosed annually and 7780 deaths occur. The incidence of endometrial cancer increases with age and over 90% of women are diagnosed above the age of 50 years (median age 63 years). Most of these women (approximately 75%) are diagnosed at an early stage (stage I/II) and are potentially cured by surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy, resulting in a 5 year survival rate of 75—91%. However, the prognosis for women with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer is poor, with a median overall survival of 9—10 months.

Current treatments for advanced endometrial cancer are chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Doxorubicin, cisplatin, carboplatin, docetaxel, topotecan and paclitaxel have all shown activity as monotherapy, with response rates in the range 17—37%. Various combination regimens that include doxorubicin and/or a platinum have been investigated. However, randomised trials have failed to show any survival benefit of combinations of doxorubicin plus either cyclophosphamide or cisplatin compared with single-agent doxorubicin.

Type
Chapter
Information
Gynaecological Cancers
Biology and Therapeutics
, pp. 17 - 30
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×