Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:28:47.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Changing Behavior by Changing Environments

from Part I - Theory and Behavior Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2020

Martin S. Hagger
Affiliation:
University of California, Merced
Linda D. Cameron
Affiliation:
University of California, Merced
Kyra Hamilton
Affiliation:
Griffith University
Nelli Hankonen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Taru Lintunen
Affiliation:
University of Jyväskylä
Get access

Summary

Behavioral determinants with the largest effects are often those related to the environments in which behaviors occur. This suggests the merits of a shift in focus of changing behavior at scale away from interventions based on deliberation and decision-making and toward interventions that involve changing cues – physical, digital, social, and economic – in environments. This chapter focuses on changing cues in small-scale physical environments – sometimes known as choice architecture or nudge interventions. Despite attracting much interest, these interventions have been little explored from a theoretical perspective. Exploring the mechanisms by which some of these interventions exert their effects provides a starting point. Examining evidence of three interventions – increasing availability of healthier food options, reducing glass size, and putting warning labels on food and alcohol products – suggests no single theory explains their effects. The mechanisms by which these interventions affect behavior change also necessitate different levels of explanation and demand a theoretical framework that applies at different levels. Recognizing the distinction between model-free and model-based learning and behavior may be central to this. Advancing knowledge on changing behavior by changing environments requires robustly designed field studies to estimate effect sizes, complemented by laboratory studies testing mechanisms to optimize interventions and develop theoretical understanding.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ben-Shahar, O. (2017). More failed nudges: Evidence of ineffective “behaviorally informed” disclosures. Jotwell. https://contracts.jotwell.com/more-failed-nudges-evidence-of-ineffective-behaviorally-informed-disclosures/Google Scholar
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2016). Liking, wanting, and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. American Psychologist, 71, 670679. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000059Google Scholar
Bianchi, F., Garnett, E., Dorsel, C., Aveyard, P., & Jebb, S. A. (2018). Restructuring physical micro-environments to reduce the demand for meat: A systematic review and qualitative comparative analysis. Lancet Planet Health, 2, e384e397 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30188-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackwell, A. K. M., Lee, I., Scollo, M., Wakefield, M., Munafò, M. R., & Marteau, T. M. (2019). Should cigarette pack sizes be capped? Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14770Google Scholar
Bollard, T., Maubach, N., Walker, N., & Ni Mhurchu, C. (2016). Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people’s predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: An experimental study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13, 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0421-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, K. S. (1973). Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psychological Review, 80, 307336. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035592Google Scholar
Brewer, N. T., Hall, M. G., Noar, S. M. et al. (2016). Effect of pictorial cigarette pack warnings on changes in smoking behavior: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176, 905912. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2621Google Scholar
Cho, Y. J., Thrasher, J. F., Yong, H. H. et al. (2018). Path analysis of warning label effects on negative emotions and quit attempts: A longitudinal study of smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the US. Social Science and Medicine, 197, 226234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, N., Pechey, E., Kosite, D. et al. (2019). Impact on selection and consumption of health warning labels on food, alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks: Protocol for a systematic review. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jt52mGoogle Scholar
Crockett, R. A., King, S. E., Marteau, T. M. et al. (2018). Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD009315. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2Google ScholarPubMed
Daw, N. D., Gershman, S. J., Seymour, B., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2011). Model-based influences on humans’ choices and striatal prediction errors. Neuron, 69, 12041215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.027CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dayan, P., & Niv, Y. (2008). Reinforcement learning: The good, the bad and the ugly. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 185196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Wit, S., & Dickinson, A. (2009). Associative theories of goal-directed behaviour: A case for animal-human translational models. Psychology Research, 73, 463476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0230-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diepeveen, S., Ling, T., Suhrcke, M., Roland, M., & Marteau, T. M. (2013). Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Public Health, 13, 756 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-756Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J. (2014). The I3 Model: Metatheory, theory, and evidence. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 49 (pp. 1104). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, T. L., Kemp, C., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2008). Bayesian models of cognition. In Sun, R. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology (pp. 59100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, D. (2011). Health warning messages on tobacco products: A review. Tobacco Control, 20, 327337. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.037630Google Scholar
Henrich, J. P. (2016). The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollands, G. J., Bignardi, G., Johnston, M. et al. (2017). The TIPPME intervention typology for changing environments to change behaviour. Nature Human Behavior, 1, 0140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollands, G. J., Cartwright, E., Pilling, M. et al. (2018). Impact of reducing portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: A stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 15, 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0705-1Google Scholar
Hollands, G. J., Marteau, T. M., & Fletcher, P. C. (2016). Non-conscious processes in changing health-related behaviour: A conceptual analysis and framework. Health Psychology Review, 10, 381394. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1138093Google Scholar
Hollands, G. J., McDermott, M. S., Lindson-Hawley, N. et al. (2015). Interventions to increase adherence to medications for tobacco dependence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD009164 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009164.pub2Google Scholar
Hollands, G. J., Shemilt, I., Marteau, T. M. et al. (2013). Altering choice architecture to change population health behaviour: A large-scale conceptual and empirical scoping review of interventions within micro-environments. www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/245108Google Scholar
Hollands, G. J., Shemilt, I., Marteau, T. M. et al. (2015). Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 9, CD011045 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2Google Scholar
Johnson, E. J., Shu, S. B., Dellaert, B. G. C. et al. (2012). Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Letters, 23, 487504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9186-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantzari, E., Vasiljevic, M., Turney, I., Pilling, M., & Marteau, T. (2018). Impact of warning labels on sugar-sweetened beverages on parental selection: An online experimental study. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 259267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.016Google Scholar
Marchiori, D. R., Adriaanse, M. A., & De Ridder, D. T. D. (2017). Unresolved questions in nudging research: Putting the psychology back in nudging. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11, e12297. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marteau, T. M., Hollands, G. J., & Fletcher, P. C. (2012). Changing human behavior to prevent disease: The importance of targeting automatic processes. Science, 337, 14921495. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226918Google Scholar
Marteau, T. M., Hollands, G. J., Shemilt, I., & Jebb, S. A. (2015). Downsizing: Policy options to reduce portion sizes to help tackle obesity. BMJ, 351, h5863. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5863Google Scholar
Maynard, O. M., Brooks, J. C., Munafò, M. R., & Leonards, U. (2017). Neural mechanisms underlying visual attention to health warnings on branded and plain cigarette packs. Addiction, 112, 662672. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13699Google Scholar
Maynard, O. M., Gove, H., Skinner, A. L., & Munafò, M. R. (2018). Severity and susceptibility: Measuring the perceived effectiveness and believability of tobacco health warnings. BMC Public Health, 18, 468. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5385-xGoogle Scholar
Melnikoff, D. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2018). The mythical number two. Trends in Cognitive Science, 22, 280293, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.001Google Scholar
Mitchell, G. (2012). Revisiting truth or triviality: The external validity of research in the psychological laboratory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 109117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611432343Google Scholar
Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M. et al. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behavior, 1, 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021Google Scholar
Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 221229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0522-1Google Scholar
Norris, E., Finnerty, A. N., Hastings, J., Stokes, G., & Michie, S. (2019). A scoping review of ontologies related to human behaviour change. Nature Human Behavior, 3, 164172. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0511-4Google Scholar
O’Connor, A. M., Tsafnat, G., Gilbert, S. B. et al. (2019). Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: A summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR). Systematic Reviews, 8, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0975-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Doherty, J. P., Cockburn, J., & Pauli, W. M. (2017). Learning, reward, and decision making. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 68, 73100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044216CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Osiurak, F., Rossetti, Y., & Badets, A. (2017). What is an affordance? 40 years later. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 77, 403417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.014Google Scholar
Pechey, R., Attwood, A. S., Couturier, D. L. et al. (2015). Does glass size and shape influence judgements of the volume of wine? PLoS ONE, 10, e0144536. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144536Google Scholar
Pechey, R., Cartwright, E., Pilling, M. et al. (2019). Impact of increasing the proportion of healthier foods available on energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: A stepped wedge randomized controlled pilot trial. Appetite, 133, 286296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.11.013Google Scholar
Pechey, R., Couturier, D. L., Hollands, G. J., Mantzari, E., Munafò, M. R., & Marteau, T. M. (2016). Does wine glass size influence sales for on-site consumption? A multiple treatment reversal design. BMC Public Health, 16, 390. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3068-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pechey, R., Couturier, D. L., Hollands, G. J., Mantzari, E., Zupan, Z., & Marteau, T. M. (2017). Wine glass size and wine sales: A replication study in two bars. BMC Research Notes, 10, 287. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2610-0Google Scholar
Pilling, M., Clarke, N., Pechey, R., Hollands, G., & Marteau, T. (2019). Wine glass size and sales: A meta-analysis of studies in bars and restaurants. Unpublished manuscript, King’s College London.Google Scholar
Schultz, W. (2006). Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 57, 87115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070229Google Scholar
Stothart, G., Maynard, O., Lavis, R., & Munafò, M. (2016). Neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 161, 155162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.01.025Google Scholar
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Swinburn, B. A., Kraak, V. I., Allender, S. et al. (2019). The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: Lancet commission report. Lancet, 393, 791846. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32822-8Google Scholar
Szaszi, B., Palinkas, A., Palfi, B., Szollosi, A., & Aczel, B. (2018). A systematic scoping review of the choice architecture movement: Toward understanding when and why nudges work. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 355366. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thrasher, J. F., Carpenter, M. J., Andrews, J. O. et al. (2012). Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43, 590600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.025Google Scholar
Vasiljevic, M., Cartwright, E., Pechey, R. et al. (2017). Physical micro-environment interventions for healthier eating in the workplace: protocol for a stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial. Pilot Feasibility Studies, 3, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0141-zGoogle Scholar
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249Google Scholar
Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2016). Healthy through habit: Interventions for initiating and maintaining health behavior change. Behavioral Science and Policy, 2, 7183. https://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2016.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×