Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:14:23.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Liaison Psychiatry and Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2024

By
Hugh Series
Edited by
George Tadros  and
George Crowther
George Tadros
Affiliation:
Aston University, Birmingham
George Crowther
Affiliation:
Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds
Get access

Summary

This chapter focuses on aspects of mental health law that are of particular relevance to psychiatrists working in general hospitals. The law is described as it stands in England and Wales on 1 August 2021, where the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1983 (amended in 2007) regulates the treatment of people with mental disorders and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 is intended to empower and protect people who lack the capacity to make decisions. Many countries have similar arrangements for mental health, particularly those in common law jurisdictions such as the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Mental capacity law is more diverse across jurisdictions. A few jurisdictions, for instance Northern Ireland, have introduced legislation that fuses mental health and mental capacity, although it has not yet been implemented.

Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Old Age Liaison Psychiatry , pp. 70 - 81
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mental Capacity Act 2005. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents.Google Scholar
Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice. GOV.UK, Office of the Public Guardian, 22 July 2013. www.gov.uk/government/publications/mental-capacity-act-code-of-practice.Google Scholar
Mental Capacity Act (MCA) Code of Practice.Google Scholar
Hughes, J., Crepaz-Keay, D., Emmett, C., and Fulford, K. The Montgomery ruling, individual values and shared decision-making in psychiatry. BJPsych Advances 2018, 24 (2): 93–100. For the case itself, see Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11. See also Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCA, sections 9–14.Google Scholar
MCA, sections 24–26.Google Scholar
MCA, sections 36–39.Google Scholar
MCA Code of Practice, paragraphs 10.42–10.50.Google Scholar
Dolan, B. Caesarean section: Treatment of mental disorder? Tameside & Glossop Acute Services Unit v CH (a patient) [1996] 1 FLR 762. BMJ 1997, 314: 1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HL v The United Kingdom 45508/99 [2004] ECHR 720 (5 October 2004).Google Scholar
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards: Code of Practice to Supplement the Main Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice. London: TSO, 2008. www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/Deprivation%20of%20liberty%20safeguards%20code%20of%20practice.pdf.Google Scholar
P v Cheshire West and P and Q v Surrey County Council [2014] UKSC 19.Google Scholar
Regina (Ferreira) v Inner South London Senior Coroner [2017] EWCA Civ 31.Google Scholar
Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1985] 3 All ER 402, at 423, per Lord Scarman.Google Scholar
Treloar, A., Philpot, M., and Beats, B. Concealing medication in patients’ food. Lancet 2001, 357: 62–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Care Quality Commission. Brief guide: Covert medication in mental health services. April 2018. www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20180406_9001398_briefguide-covert_medication_mental_health_v2.pdf.Google Scholar
Ruck Keene, A. (ed.). Assessment of Mental Capacity (4th ed.). London: Law Society/British Medical Association, 2015.Google Scholar
General Medical Council. Acting as a witness in legal proceedings. April 2013. www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/acting-as-a-witness/acting-as-a-witness-in-legal-proceedings.Google Scholar
Rix, K., Eastman, N., and Adshead, G., on behalf of the Special Committee for Professional Practice and Ethics. Responsibilities of psychiatrists who provide expert opinion to courts and tribunals. CR193. Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2015 . www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/default-source/improving-care/better-mh-policy/college-reports/college-report-cr193.pdf?sfvrsn=c0381b24_2.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×