Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:06:52.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - History and Historiography since 1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

By
Kevin Passmore
Edited by
Roger E. Backhouse  and
Philippe Fontaine
Kevin Passmore
Affiliation:
Cardif University
Roger E. Backhouse
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Philippe Fontaine
Affiliation:
Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan
Get access

Summary

Historians are as inclined as ever to divide the past into great ages: traditional, premodern, modern, postmodern, colonial, postcolonial, global, feudal, capitalist, et cetera. Historiographers have been particularly attracted to these watersheds. They may claim that inexorable external forces, such as modernization or globalization, break down old certainties and necessitate a new way of writing history appropriate to new times. The shift from social to political history after 1945 and then the cultural turn of the 1990s were both presented in that way. Historiographers may also evoke heroic precursors, great historians, and theoreticians, men and women who possessed privileged insight not only into historical method, but into the very movement of history. The work of these canonical scholars possesses quasi-biblical status, and it must be elucidated and commented upon. Historians sometimes forget to historicize when their own discipline is at stake. A major contention of this essay is that while periodization is unavoidable, one must not reify periods or mistake chronological categorization for explanation.

It would be unfair to charge historians with ignorance of the problems of these ways of writing history. In 1947, Sir Maurice Powicke wittily dismissed teleologies thus:

To track down every nerve in the body politic and locate each impulse, as though they carried some secret message, is as futile as to read the rivulets that compose the upmost reaches of the Thames as a foresight of the wharves and shipping in the spacious estuary.

(Powicke 1947, p. 340, cited in Bentley 2005, p. 113)

Keywords

political historyWest GermanyMarxismcultural historyhistoriographylinguistic theory
Type
Chapter
Information
A Historiography of the Modern Social Sciences , pp. 29 - 61
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amin, S. 1984. “Gandhi as Mahatma: Gorakhpur District, Eastern UP, 1921–2,” Subaltern Studies 3:1–61.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. H. 1998. “The Historian as Inquisitor: The Ethics of Interrogating Subaltern Voices,” Rethinking History 2.3:379–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baehr, P. 1990. “The ‘Masses’ in Weber’s Political Sociology,” Economy and Society 19.2:242–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, Austin: University ofTexas Press.Google Scholar
Barrow, C. W. 2000. More Than a Historian: The Political and Economic Thought of Charles A. Beard, New York: Transaction.Google Scholar
Bayly, C. A. et al. 2006. “AHR Conversation: On Transnational History,” The American Historical Review 111.5:1441–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, C. A. 1913. An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beard, C. A. 1915. Economic Origins of Jeffersonian Democracy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beard, C. A. 1934. The Nature of the Social Sciences. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
Bender, T. 2006. A Nation among Nations: America’s Place in World History. New York: Hill &Wang.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. M. 1996. Ale, Beer and Brewsters in England: Women’s Work in a Changing World, 1300–1600. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Bentley, M. 2005. Modernizing England’s Past: English Historiography in the Age of Modernism, 1870–1970. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Berger, S. 1997. The Search for Normality: National Identity and Historical Consciousness in Germany Since 1800. Leamington Spa: Berg.Google Scholar
Berger, S. 2010. “Comparative History.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. Berger, S., Feldner, H., and Passmore, K.. London: Bloomsbury, 161–79.Google Scholar
Berger, S., Donovan, M., and Passmore, K., eds. 1999. Europe since 1800: Writing National Histories. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berkhofer, R. F. 1969. A Behavioral Approach to Historical Analysis. New York and London: CollierMacmillan.Google Scholar
Berkhofer, R. F. 1995. Beyond the Great Story: History as Text and Discourse, Cambridge,MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Berstein, S. 1992. “L’historien et la culture politique,” Vingtième Siècle 35.1:67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, J. 2008. “Gender as Question of Historical Analysis,” Gender and History 20.3:558–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branca, P. 1978. Women in Europe since 1750, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Burguière, A. 2006. L’ école des Annales: une histoire intellectuelle. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton,NJ: PrincetonUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, A. 2004. “In the Waiting-Room of History,” London Review of Books, 3–8.Google Scholar
Clark, G. Kitson. 1962. The Making of Victorian England. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Clavin, P. 2005. “Defining Transnationalism,” Contemporary European History 14.4:421–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collini, S. 1988. “‘Discipline History’ and ‘Intellectual History’: Reflections on the Historiography of the Social Sciences in Britain and France,” Revue de synthèse 109.3–4:387–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. A. 1979. Gramsci and Italy’s Passive Revolution. London: Croon Helm.Google Scholar
Dinges, M. 1994. “The Reception of Michel Foucault’s Ideas on Social Discipline, Mental Asylums, Hospitals and the Medical Profession in German Historiography.” In Reassessing Foucault: Power, Medicine and the Body, ed. Jones, C. and Porter, R.. London: Routledge, 181–212.Google Scholar
Downs, L. L. 2010. Writing Gender History, 2nd ed. London: HodderArnold, 1994.Google Scholar
Elton, G. R. 1953. The Tudor Revolution in Government: Administrative Changes in the Reign of Henry VIII. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, G. R. 1963. Reformation Europe 1517–1559. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Elton, G. R. 1967. The Practice of History. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Elton, G. R. 1968. The Future of the Past. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Elton, G. R. 1973. Reform and Renewal. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Elton, G. R. 1991. Return to Essentials: Some Reflections on the Present State of Historical Study. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espagne, M. 1994. “Sur les limites du comparatisme en histoire culturelle,” Genèses. Sciences sociales et histoire 17.17:112–21.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. 1996. In Defence of History. London: Granta.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. 2009. Cosmopolitan Islanders: British Historians and the European Continent. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1971. L’ Ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Fulbrook, M. 2002. Historical theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Furet, F. 1985. Penser la Révolution française. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Furet, F. 1995. Le passé d’une illusion: essai sur l’idée communiste au XXe siècle. Paris: RobertLaffont/Calman-Lévy.Google Scholar
Ghosh, P. 1998. “Laid Down by Ranke,” London Review of Books, 18–19.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1987. “Out of the Orrery: E. P. Thompson on consciousness and history.” In Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan, 203–43.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C. 1972. I benandanti. Stregoneria e culti agrari tra Cinquecento e Seicento, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C. 1980. “Morelli, Freud and Sherlock Holmes: Clues and Scientific Method,” History Workshop Journal 9:5–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ginzburg, C. 1981. The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller/Carlo Ginzburg, trans. John Tedeschi and Anne Tedeschi. London: Routledge &Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Goguel, F. 1946. La politique des partis sous la IIIe République. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Goubert, P. 1969. L’ Ancien Régime. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Gould, W. 2004. Hindu Nationalism and the Language of Politics in Late Colonial India. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Guha, R. 1982. “On Some Aspects of the Historiography of Colonial India,” Subaltern Studies 1:37–44.Google Scholar
Gutman, H. G. 1976. The Black Family in Slavery and Freedom 1750–1925. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, E. B. 1993. Righteous Discontent: The Women’s Movement in the Black Baptist Church, 1880–1920. Cambridge,MA: HarvardUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Higham, J. 1965. History: Professional Scholarship in America. Baltimore: Johns HopkinsUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. 1972. “Karl Marx’s contribution to historiography.” In Ideology in Social Science: Readings in Critical Social Theory, ed. Blackburn, Robin. London: Fontana, 265–83.Google Scholar
Hudson, P. 2010. “Economic History.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. Berger, S., Feldner, H., and Passmore, K.. London: Bloomsbury, 248–66.Google Scholar
Iggers, G. G. 1984. New Directions in European Historiography. Middletown,CT: WesleyanUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Iggers, G. G. 1997. Historiography in the Twentieth Century. Hanover andLondon: WeslyanUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Iriye, A. 2004a. Global Community: The Role of International Organizations in the Making of the Contemporary World. Berkeley: University ofCalifornia Press.Google Scholar
Iriye, A. 2004b. “Transnational History,” Contemporary European History 13.2:211–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, K. 1991. Re-Thinking History. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., and Porter, R., eds. 1994. “Introduction.” In Reassessing Foucault: Power, Medicine and the Body. Studies in the social history of medicine. London: Routledge, 1–16.Google Scholar
Jordan, G. 2010. “‘Voices from Below’: Doing People’s History in Cardiff Docklands.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. S. Berger, H. Feldner, and K. Passmore. London: Bloomsbury, 330–52.Google Scholar
Joyce, P. 1980. Work, Society and Politics: The Culture of the Factory in Later Victorian England. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, P. 1991. Visions of the People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, P. 1994. Democratic Subjects: the Self and the Social in Nineteenth-century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koonz, C. 1988. Mothers in the Fatherland: Women, the Family and Nazi Politics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
LaCapra, D., and Kaplan, S. L.. 1982. Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals and New Perspectives. Ithaca,NY: CornellUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. 2010. “Political History.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. Berger, S., Feldner, H., and Passmore, K.. London: Bloomsbury, 209–27.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J., and Taylor, M.. 1993. “The Poverty of Protest: Gareth Stedman Jones and the Politics of Language: A Reply,” Social History 18.1:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Goff, J. 1974. “Les mentalités: Une histoire ambiguë.” In Faire de l’histoire, ed. Nora, P.. Paris: Gallimard, 76–94.Google Scholar
Le Goff, J. 1988. La Nouvelle histoire, 2nd ed. Paris: Complexe, 1978.Google Scholar
Majumdar, R. 2010. Writing Postcolonial History. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Mann, G. 1974. The History of Germany since 1789. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
McNay, L. 1994. Foucault: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Middell, M. 2010. “The Annales.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. Berger, S., Feldner, H., and Passmore, K.. London: Bloomsbury, 108–22.Google Scholar
Munslow, A. 1986. “The Decline of Ethnic Politics in Boston, 1882–1921.” Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society 98:116–34.Google Scholar
Munslow, A. 1997. Deconstructing History. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munslow, A., and Rosenstone, R. A., eds. 2004. Experiments in Rethinking History, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Namier, L. 1929. The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Namier, L. 1930. England in the Age of the American Revolution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Namier, L. 1955. Personalities and Powers. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Noble, D. W. 1985. End of American History: Democracy, Capitalism, and the Metaphor of Two Worlds in Anglo-American Historical Writing, 1880–1980. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Noiriel, G. 1988. Le Creuset français: histoire de l’immigration, XIXe-XXe siècles. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Noiriel, G. 1996. Sur la “crise” de l’histoire, 2nd ed. Paris: Gallimard, 1996.Google Scholar
Noiriel, G. 2006. Introduction à la socio-histoire. Bagneux: Numilog.Google Scholar
Nora, P. ed. 1987. Essais d’ego-histoire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Novick, P. 1988. That Noble Dream: The “objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, B. D. 1994. E. P. Thompson: Objections and Oppositions. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Palmer, W. 2001. Engagement with the Past: The Lives and Works of the World War II Generation of Historians. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Passmore, K. 2008. “The gendered genealogy of political religions theory,” Gender & History 20.3:644–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, H. 2011. “Introduction: Fathers of history,” Storia della Storiografia, 59–60:224–30.Google Scholar
Perkin, H. 1981. “What Is Social History?” In The Structured Crowd, ed. Perkin, H.. Sussex: Harvester, 1–27.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1961. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. First published in 1957.
Powicke, Maurice. 1947 King Henry the Third and Lord Edward, Vol. I. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rigby, S. H. 1995. “Historical Causation: Is One Thing More Important than Another?” History 80.259:227–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E. 1985. A Woman’s Place: An Oral History of Working-Class Women 1890–1940. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rostow, W. W. 1949. British Economy of the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rudé, G. 1964. The Crowd in History: A Study of Popular Disturbances in France and England, 1730–1848. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Samuel, R. 1981. People’s History and Socialist Theory. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Saunier, P.-Y. 2004. “Circulations, connexions et espaces transnationaux,” Genèses 57.4:110–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. C. 1991. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, New Haven,CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. W. 1986. “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis,” The American Historical Review 91.5:1053–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. W. 1988. “Women in The Making of the English Working Class.” In Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press, 68–90.Google Scholar
Shepard, T. 2006. The Invention of Decolonization: The Algerian War and the Remaking of France. Ithaca,NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Shorter, E. 1977. The Making of the Modern Family. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Sirinelli, J.-F. 1992. “Des droites et du politique.” In Histoire des droites en France, ed. Sirinelli, J.-F.. Paris: Gallimard, iii–xlv.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. 2002. Visions of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slavin, A. 1990. “Telling the story: GR Elton and the Tudor Age,” Sixteenth Century Journal 21.2:151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. 1981. Ladies of the Leisure Class: The Bourgeoisie of Northern France in the Nineteenth Century, PrincetonNJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, B. 1998. The Gender of History: Men, Women, and Historical Practice, Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Soboul, A. 1968. “Survivances ‘féodales’ dans la société rurale du XIXe siècle.” Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 23.5:965–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spierenburg, P. 1991. The Broken Spell: A Cultural and Anthropological History of Preindustrial Europe. New Brunswick,NJ: Rutgers University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stedman Jones, G. 1982. “The Language of Chartism.” In The Chartist Experience: Studies in Working-Class Radicalism and Culture, 1830–60, ed. Epstein, James and Thompson, Dorothy. London: Macmillan, 3–57.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, G. 1983. “Rethinking Chartism.” In Languages of Class: Studies in English Working-Class History 1932–1982. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, S. 1997. The Career and Legend of Vasco da Gama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Surkis, J. 2012. “When Was the Linguistic Turn? A Genealogy,” American Historical Review 117.3:700–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. 1997. “The Beginnings of Modern British Social History,” History Workshop Journal 43:155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. A. 2012. “Comment: Not Yet Far Enough,” American Historical Review 117.3:794–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, K. 1971. Religion and the Decline of Magic. London: Peregrine.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1963. The Making of the English Working Class. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1965. “The Peculiarities of the English,” Socialist Register 2:311–62.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1967. “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism,” Past & Present 38.1:56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century,” Past and Present 50:76–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1978. “Eighteenth-century English society: class struggle without class?”Social History 3.2:133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1979a. “The Peculiarities of the English.” In The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays. Merlin: London.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1979b. The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays. Merlin: London.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. 1964. The Vendée. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Timmins, A. 2012. Review of A History of History (review no. 1356). Reviews in History. Downloaded at: [Accessed January 8, 2013].
Trebitsch, M. 1998. “L’histoire comparée des intellectuels comme histoire expérimentale.” In Pour une histoire comparée des intellectuels, ed. Granjon, M.-C. and Trebitsch, M.. Paris: Complexe, 61–78.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, I. 2011. “Historical Writing in the United States.” In The Oxford History of Historical Writing: Volume 5, ed. Schneider, A. and Woolf, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 199–219.Google Scholar
Welskopp, T, 2010. “Social History.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. Berger, S., Feldner, H., and Passmore, K.. London: Bloomsbury, 228–47.Google Scholar
Werner, M. and Zimmermann, B.. 2004. De la comparaison à l’histoire croisée. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Werner, M. and Zimmermann, B. 2006. “Beyond Comparison: Histoire Croisée and the Challenge of Reflexivity,” History and Theory 45.1:30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. A. 1980. The Search for Beulah Land: The Welsh and the Atlantic Revolution. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Wood, A. 2001. “Poore Men Will Speak One Day”: Plebeian Languages of Deference and Defiance in England, c. 1520–1640. In The Politics of the Excluded, ed. Harris, T.. New York: Palgrave, 202–27.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P. 1985. From Menocchio to Piero Della Francesca: The Work of Carlo Ginzburg. The Historical Journal 28.4:983–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×