Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:09:32.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The Relationship between Philosophy and its History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2022

By
Susan James
Edited by
Richard Bourke  and
Quentin Skinner
Richard Bourke
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Quentin Skinner
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

Although many historians of philosophy work co-operatively with their ahistorical colleagues and vice versa, some tension between the two groups remains. This is most obvious among defenders of what I call the Separation Thesis – the view that the history of philosophy is separate from, and subordinate to, philosophy proper. Since the Separation Thesis is vulnerable to a range of powerful criticisms, several of which I discuss in the chapter, it is not immediately clear why philosophers continue to defend it. To understand what makes it appealing, I argue, we need to examine the historical context from which it has habitually arisen.

Keywords

Philosophyhistory
Type
Chapter
Information
History in the Humanities and Social Sciences , pp. 211 - 228
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antognazza, Maria Rosa. 2015. ‘The Benefit to Philosophy of the Study of History’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23: 1, pp. 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, Francis. 1996. ‘The Advancement of Learning’ in Francis Bacon, ed. Vickers, Brian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cottingham, John. 2005. ‘Why Should Analytic Philosophers do History of Philosophy?’ in Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy, ed. Sorell, T. and Rogers, G. A. J.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin. 1986. ‘Dialogues with the Dead’, Synthese, 67: 1, pp. 33–49.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. 2013. ‘The Taming of Philosophy’ in Philosophy and its History, ed. Laerke, Mogens, Smith, Justin E. H. and Schliesser, Eric. Oxford.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1997. ‘The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom’ in Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, ed. Rabinow, Paul. New York.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. 2005. ‘What’s Philosophical about the History of Philosophy?’ in Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy, ed. Sorell, T. and Rogers, G. A. J.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron. 2013. ‘Seventeenth-Century Moral Philosophy: Self-Help, Self-Knowledge and the Devil’s Mountain’ in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics, ed. Crisp, Roger. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. 1995. Philosophy as a Way of Life, ed. Davidson, Arnold, trans. Michael Chase. Oxford.Google Scholar
Halliwell, Stephen. 2011. Between Ecstasy and Truth. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. 2005. ‘The History of Philosophy as Philosophy’ in Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy, ed. Sorell, T. and Rogers, G. A. J.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Huemer, Michael. 2020. ‘Against History’, http://fakenous.net/?p=1168.Google Scholar
Jantzen, Grace M. 1998. Becoming Divine. Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Religion. Manchester.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago.Google Scholar
Laerke, Mogens. 2013. ‘The Anthropological Analogy and the Constitution of Historical Perspectivism’ in Philosophy and its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Laerke, Mogens, Smith, Justin E. H. and Schliesser, Eric. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy. London.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1993. ‘Maleness, Metaphor and the “Crisis of Reason”’ in A Mind of One’s Own. Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, ed. Anthony, Louise M. and Witt, Charlotte. Boulder.Google Scholar
Mercer, Christia. 2019. ‘The Contextualist Revolution in Early Modern Philosophy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 57: 3, pp. 529–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Princeton.Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander. 1998. The Art of Living: Socratic Reflections from Plato to Foucault. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1994. On the Genealogy of Morality, ed. Ansell-Pearson, Keith, trans. Carol Diethe. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1965. Timaeus and Critias, ed. Lee, Desmond. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1984. ‘The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres’ in Philosophy in History, ed. Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B. and Skinner, Q.. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1963 [1914]. ‘On Scientific Method in Philosophy’ (Herbert Spencer Lecture, Oxford 1914) in Mysticism and Logic. London.Google Scholar
Scriven, Michael. 1977. ‘Increasing Philosophy Enrollments and Appointments through Better Philosophy Teaching’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 50, pp. 232–44.Google Scholar
Sedley, David. 1999. ‘The Ideal of Godlikeness’ in Plato 2: Ethics, Politics, Religion and the Soul, ed. Fine, Gail. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sellars, John. 2013. The Art of Living: The Stoics on the Nature and Function of Philosophy. London.Google Scholar
Sidney, Philip. 1952. ‘An Apology for Poetry’ in Criticism: The Major Texts, ed. Bate, Jackson. New York.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict. 1985a. Ethics in The Collected Works of Spinoza, ed. Curley, Edwin, vol. I. Princeton.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict. 1985b. Correspondence 1661–3 in The Collected Works of Spinoza, ed. Curley, Edwin, vol. I. Princeton.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict. 2016. Theological-Political Treatise in The Collected Works of Spinoza, ed. Curley, Edwin, vol. II. Princeton.Google Scholar
Tanesini, Alessandra. 2017. ‘Doing Philosophy’ in The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology, ed. d’Oro, Giuseppina and Overgaard, Søren. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2017. ‘What Can we Do When we Do Metaphysics?’ in The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology, ed. d’Oro, Giuseppina and Overgaard, Sᴓren. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vermeir, Koen. 2013. ‘Philosophy and Genealogy: Ways of Writing History of Philosophy’ in Philosophy and its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Laerke, Mogens, Smith, Justin E. H. and Schliesser, Eric. Oxford.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2018. Doing Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. 2005. ‘Is the History of Philosophy Good for Philosophy?’ in Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy, ed. Sorell, T. and Rogers, G. A. J.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Yolton, John. 1986. ‘Is There a History of Philosophy? Some Difficulties and Suggestions’, Synthese, 67: 1, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×