Book contents
- Hobbes’s On the Citizen
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Hobbes’s On the Citizen
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Excavating On the Citizen
- Chapter 2 Hobbes and Aristotle on the Foundation of Political Science
- Chapter 3 All the Mind’s Pleasure: Glory, Self-Admiration, and Moral Motivation in On the Citizen and Leviathan
- Chapter 4 The Right of Nature and Political Disobedience: Hobbes’s Puzzling Thought Experiment
- Chapter 5 Motivation, Reason, and the Good in On the Citizen
- Chapter 6 Property and Despotic Sovereignty
- Chapter 7 Sovereignty and Dominium: The Foundations of Hobbesian Statehood
- Chapter 8 Corporate Persons without Authorization
- Chapter 9 Hobbes on Love and Fear of God
- Chapter 10 “A Rhapsody of Heresies”: The Scriptural Politics of On the Citizen
- Chapter 11 On the Citizen and Church-State Relations
- Chapter 12 Sovereign-Making and Biblical Covenants in On the Citizen
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 November 2019
Book contents
- Hobbes’s On the Citizen
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Hobbes’s On the Citizen
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Excavating On the Citizen
- Chapter 2 Hobbes and Aristotle on the Foundation of Political Science
- Chapter 3 All the Mind’s Pleasure: Glory, Self-Admiration, and Moral Motivation in On the Citizen and Leviathan
- Chapter 4 The Right of Nature and Political Disobedience: Hobbes’s Puzzling Thought Experiment
- Chapter 5 Motivation, Reason, and the Good in On the Citizen
- Chapter 6 Property and Despotic Sovereignty
- Chapter 7 Sovereignty and Dominium: The Foundations of Hobbesian Statehood
- Chapter 8 Corporate Persons without Authorization
- Chapter 9 Hobbes on Love and Fear of God
- Chapter 10 “A Rhapsody of Heresies”: The Scriptural Politics of On the Citizen
- Chapter 11 On the Citizen and Church-State Relations
- Chapter 12 Sovereign-Making and Biblical Covenants in On the Citizen
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Hobbes's On the CitizenA Critical Guide, pp. 236 - 248Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Primary Sources
British Library MS Harley 4235: Thomas Hobbes, The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, 1640.Google Scholar
Magdalene College, Cambridge, Pepys Library, 2099, item 7, ff. 84a–173b: Thomas Hobbes, The Elements of Law.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Ainsworth, Henry 1620. Reply to a Pretended Christian Plea for the Anti-Christian [sic] Church of Rome. London.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas 1969. Sententia libri Ethicorum, ed. Gauthier, René-Antoine, Opera omnia (Editio Leonina), tomus 47 (2 vols). Rome.Google Scholar
Aristotle 1598. Aristotles Politiques or Discourses of Government … Concerning the beginning, proceeding, and excellencie of Civile Government, ed. and trans. Le Roy, Louis. London: Adam Islip.Google Scholar
Aristotle 1964. Histoire des animaux, vol. 1, ed. Louis, P.. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Aristotle 1999. Nicomachean Ethics, ed. and trans. Irwin, Terence. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Aristotle 2011. Rhetoric to Alexander, ed. and trans. Mirhady, David C.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle 2013. Eudemian Ethics, ed. and trans. Inwood, Brad and Woolf, Raphael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Athenaeus 2009. The Learned Banqueters, Volume V: Books 10.420e-11, ed. and trans. Olsen, S. Douglas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Attersoll, William 1618. A Commentarie upon the Fourth Booke of Moses, called Numbers. London: William Iaggard.Google Scholar
Aubrey, John 1898. ‘Brief Lives’, Chiefly of Contemporaries, Set Down by John Aubrey, between the years 1669 & 1696, vol. 1, ed. Clark, Andrew. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barbeyrac, Jean 1706. “Préface du Traducteur,” in Pufendorf, Samuel, Le droit de la nature et des gens, vol. 1, ed. and trans. Barbeyrac, Jean. Amsterdam: Henri Schelte, pp. i–xcii.Google Scholar
Baret, John 1574. An Alvearie or Triple Dictionarie, in Englishe, Latin, and French. London: Henry Denham.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre [1697] 2000. “Hobbes,” in Bayle: Political Writings, ed. Jenkinson, Sally L.. Cambridge University Press, pp. 79–92.Google Scholar
Bracton, Henry de 1997. On the Laws and Customs of England, 4 vols, ed. Thorne, Samuel E.. Buffalo: William S. Hein & Co.Google Scholar
Browne, Thomas [1642/1643] 1977. “Religio Medici,” in The Major Works, ed. Patrides, C. A.. London: Penguin, pp. 59–161.Google Scholar
Bullinger, Henrich 1624. Looke from Adam, and Behold the Protestants Faith and Religion. London.Google Scholar
Burges, Cornelius 1641. The first sermon, preached to the Honourable House of Commons … Novemb. 17. 1640. London.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius 1928. De Re Publica, ed. Keyes, Clinton Walker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1999. Letters to Atticus, 4 vols, trans. Bailey, D. R. Shackleton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cocquius, Gisbertus 1668. Hobbes̕ έλeγχoμenος, sive Vindiciae pro lege, imperio, & religione, contra tractatus Thomae Hobbesii, quibus tit. De cive & Leviathan. Utrecht: Jacobus a Doeyenburg.Google Scholar
Cocquius, Gisbertus 1680. Hobbesianismi anatome, qua innumeris assertationibus ex tractatibus De homine, cive, Leviathan juxta seriem locorum theologiae christianae philosophi illius a religione christiana apostasia demonstratur, & refutatur. Utrecht: Franciscus Halma.Google Scholar
Cowell, John 1607. The Interpreter: or Booke containing the Signification of Words. Cambridge: John Legate.Google Scholar
Descartes, René [1641] 1984. “Meditations on First Philosophy, with Objections and Replies,” in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 2, ed. and trans. Cottingham, John, Kenny, Anthony, Murdoch, Dugald, and Stoothoff, Robert. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–383.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 3, ed. and trans. Cottingham, John, Kenny, Anthony, Murdoch, Dugald, and Stoothoff, Robert. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diderot, Denis [1765] 1992. “Hobbisme,” in Diderot: Political Writings, ed. Mason, John Hope and Wokler, Robert. Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Digest of Justinian 2009. Ed. Watson, Alan, 4 vols. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Du Perron, Jacques Davy 1615. Harangue faicte de la part de la Chambre ecclesiastique, en celle du Tiers Estat, sur l’article du serment. Paris: Antoine Estiene.Google Scholar
Goulston, Theodore (ed. and trans.) 1619. Aristotelis de Rhetorica seu arte Dicendi Libri tres. London.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo [1609] 1916. The Freedom of the Seas: Or, the Right Which Belongs to the Dutch to Take Part in the East Indian Trade, ed. Van Deman Magoffin, Ralph. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo [1625] 2005. The Law of War and Peace, 3 vols, ed. Tuck, Richard. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Heller, Hermann [1927] 2019. Sovereignty: A Contribution to the Theory of Public and International Law, ed. Dyzenhaus, David. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helvétius, Claude A [1758] 1973. De l’Esprit, ed. Châtelet, François. Verviers: Marabout.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas 1649. Elemens Philosophiques du Citoyen. Traicté Politique, où Les Fondemens de la Societé civile sont descouverts, trans. Sorbière, Samuel. Amsterdam: J. Blaeu.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas 1660. Les Elemens de la Politique de Monsieur Hobbes de la Traduction du sieur Du Verdus. Paris: Henri Le Gras.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas 1839–45. The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, 11 vols, ed. Molesworth, William. London: John Bohn.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas 1839–45. Thomae Hobbes malmesburiensis opera philosophica quae latine scripsit omnia, 5 vols, ed. Molesworth, William. London: John Bohn.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas [1642] 1976. Thomas White’s De Mundo Examined, trans. Jones, Harold Whitmore. London: Bradford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas [1642/1647] 1983. De Cive: The Latin Version, ed. Warrender, Howard. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas [1641] 1984. “Third Set of Objections,” in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 2, ed. and trans. Cottingham, John, Kenny, Anthony, Murdoch, Dugald, and Stoothoff, Robert. Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–37.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas 1994. The Correspondence, 2 vols, ed. Malcolm, Noel. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas [1650] 1994. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic: Part I, Human Nature, Part II, De Corpore Politico, ed. Gaskin, J. C. A.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas [1642/1647] 1998. On the Citizen, ed. and trans. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas [1681] 2005. “A Dialogue between a Philosopher and a Student, of the Common Laws of England,” in Writings on Common Law and Hereditary Right, ed. Cromartie, Alan and Skinner, Quentin. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas [1681] 2010. Behemoth, or The Long Parliament, ed. Seaward, Paul. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas [1651/1668] 2012. Leviathan: The English and Latin Texts, ed. Malcolm, Noel. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas 2017. Three-Text Edition of Thomas Hobbes’s Political Theory: The Elements of Law, De Cive and Leviathan, ed. Baumgold, Deborah. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, Richard 2013. Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, 3 vols, ed. McGrade, Arthur Stephen. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, Edward 1676. A Brief View and Survey of the Dangerous and Pernicious Errors to Church and State, in Mr. Hobbes’s Book, entitled Leviathan. Oxford.Google Scholar
James I, 1615. Déclaration du Sérénissime Roy Iaques I … Pour le Droit des Rois & indépendance de leurs Couronnes. London: Iehan Bill.Google Scholar
Jeffs, Robin (ed.) 1970. The English Revolution, vol. 1: Fast Sermons to Parliament, 1640–41. London: Cornmarket Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. [1667] 2013. “A New Method for Learning and Teaching Jurisprudence,” in The Science of Right in Leibniz’s Moral and Political Philosophy, ed. Johns, Christopher. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 149–63.Google Scholar
Liddell, Henry George, Scott, Robert, Jones, Henry Stuart and McKenzie, Roderick 1968. A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th edition [LSJ9]. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Locke, John [1689] 1975. An Essay concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Stephen 1641b. A Sermon Preached Before the House of Commons … November 17, 1640. London.Google Scholar
Martel, Thomas de [1643] 1983. “Martel to Sorbière, 13 January 1643,” in Hobbeses, Thomas, De Cive: The Latin Version, ed. Warrender, Howard. Oxford: Clarendon Press, p. 300.Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin 1933–88. Correspondance du P. Marin Mersenne, Religieux Minime, 17 vols., ed. De Waard, Cornelis, Pintard, René, Rochot, Bernard, and Beaulieu, Armand. Paris: PUF and CNRS.Google Scholar
Middleton, Thomas 2010. The Collected Works, ed. Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel [1672] 1934. De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo, trans. Oldfather, C. H. and Oldfather, W. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel [1660] 2009. Two Books of the Elements of Universal Jurisprudence, ed. Behme, Thomas. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques [1755] 1992. “Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men,” in The Collected Writings of Rousseau, vol. 3, ed. Kelly, Christopher and Masters, Roger D.. Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College, pp. 1–95.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques [1762] 2010. The Collected Writings of Rousseau, vol. 13: Emile, or On Education, trans. and ed. Kelly, Christopher and Bloom, Allan. Hanover: University Press of New England for Dartmouth College.Google Scholar
Smith, John [1660] 1968. “Select Discourses,” in The Cambridge Platonists, ed. Cragg, Gerald R.. Oxford University Press, pp. 75–140.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco [1612] 1944. “De Legibus ac Deo Legislatore,” in Selections from Three Works, vol. 2, trans. Williams, G. L. et al. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Suetonius, 1914. Lives of the Caesars: Volume II, trans. Rolfe, John Carew. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Herbert 1649. A Discourse of the Right of the Church in a Christian State. London.Google Scholar
Van Velthuysen, Lambert [1651] 2013. A Letter on the Principles of Justness and Decency in Defence of the Treatise De Cive of the Learned Mr Hobbes, ed. and trans. de Mowbray, Malcolm. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas [1560] 1994. The Art of Rhetoric, ed. Medine, Peter E.. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash 2016. “Sovereign Jurisdiction, Territorial Rights, and Membership in Hobbes,” in Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, Kinch (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes. Oxford University Press, pp. 397–431.Google Scholar
Abizadeh, Arash 2017. “Hobbes’s Agnostic Theology before Leviathan,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47: 714–37.Google Scholar
Ando, Clifford 2010. “A Dwelling Beyond Violence: On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Contemporary Republicans,” History of Political Thought 31: 183–220.Google Scholar
Apeldoorn, Laurens van 2019. “On the Person and Office of the Sovereign in Hobbes’ Leviathan,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, online first: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2019.1613632.Google Scholar
Baumgold, Deborah 2008. “The Difficulty of Hobbes Interpretation,” Political Theory 36: 827–55.Google Scholar
Baumgold, Deborah 2010. “Slavery Discourse before the Restoration: The Barbary Coast, Justinian’s Digest, and Hobbes’s Political Theory,” History of European Ideas 36: 412–18.Google Scholar
Baumgold, Deborah 2017. “Editor’s Introduction,” in Baumgold, Deborah (ed.), Three-Text Edition of Thomas Hobbes’s Political Theory: The Elements of Law, De Cive and Leviathan. Cambridge University Press, pp. ix–xxi.Google Scholar
Berger, Adolf 1953. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Bejan, Teresa M. 2017. Mere Civility: Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel 1997. Liberty, Right and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buckland, William W. 1921. A Text-Book of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua 1997. “The Natural Goodness of Humanity,” in Reath, Andrews, Herman, Barbara, and Korsgaard, Christine M. (eds.), Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls. Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–39.Google Scholar
Coleman, Janet 1983. “Medieval Discussions of Property: Ratio and Dominium According to John of Paris and Marsilius of Padua,” History of Political Thought 4: 209–28.Google Scholar
Collins, James 2017. “Dynastic Instability, the Emergence of the French Monarchical Commonwealth and the Coming of the Rhetoric of ‘L’état’, 1360s to 1650s,” in von Friedeburg, Robert and Morrill, John (eds.), Monarchy Transformed: Princes and their Elites in Early Modern Western Europe. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–126.Google Scholar
Collins, Jeffrey 2018. “All the Wars of Christendom: Hobbes’s Theory of Religious Conflict,” in van Apeldoorn, Laurens and Douglass, Robin (eds.), Hobbes on Politics and Religion. Oxford University Press, pp. 219–38.Google Scholar
Cooke, Paul D. 1996. Hobbes and Christianity: Reassessing the Bible in Leviathan. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Cooper, John 1990. “Political Animals and Civic Friendship,” In Patzig, Günther (ed.), Aristoteles’ Politik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, pp. 220–41.Google Scholar
Cressy, David 2006. England on Edge: Crisis and Revolution, 1640–1642. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cromartie, Alan 2018. “Hobbes, Calvinism, and Determinism,” in van Apeldoorn, Laurens and Douglass, Robin (eds.), Hobbes on Politics and Religion. Oxford University Press, pp. 95–115.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin 1992. “‘I durst not write so boldly,’ or, How to Read Hobbes’s Theological-Political Treatise,” in Bostrenghi, Daniela (ed.), Hobbes e Spinoza, Scienza e Politica. Naples: Bibliopolis, pp. 497–593.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin 1996. “Calvin and Hobbes, or, Hobbes as an Orthodox Christian,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34: 257–71.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin 2004. “The Covenant with God in Hobbes’s Leviathan,” in Sorell, Tom and Foisneau, Luc (eds.), Leviathan After 350 Years. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 199–217.Google Scholar
Deigh, John 1996. “Reason and Ethics in Hobbes’s Leviathan,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34: 33–60.Google Scholar
Douglass, Robin 2015a. Rousseau and Hobbes: Nature, Free Will, and the Passions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Douglass, Robin 2015b. “Thomas Hobbes’s Changing Account of Liberty and Challenge to Republicanism,” History of Political Thought 36: 281–309.Google Scholar
Douglass, Robin 2018. “Authorisation and Representation before Leviathan,” Hobbes Studies 31: 30–47.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David 2012. “Hobbes on the Authority of Law,” in Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas (eds.), Hobbes and the Law. Cambridge University Press, pp. 186–209.Google Scholar
Evrigenis, Ioannis 2014. Images of Anarchy: The Rhetoric and Science in Hobbes’s State of Nature. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Sandra 2014. “Hobbes and the Question of Power,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52: 61–86.Google Scholar
Foisneau, Luc 2004. “Leviathan’s Theory of Justice,” in Sorell, Tom and Foisneau, Luc (eds.) Leviathan after 350 Years. Oxford University Press, pp. 105–22.Google Scholar
Foisneau, Luc and Wright, George (eds.) 2004. Nuove prospettive critiche sul Leviatano di Hobbes nel 350° anniversario di pubblicazione/New Critical Perspectives on Hobbes’s Leviathan Upon the 350th Anniversary of Its Publication. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Frost, Samantha 2019. “Hobbes, Life, and the Politics of Self-Preservation: The Role of Materialism in Hobbes’s Political Philosophy,” in Lloyd, S. A. (ed.), Interpreting Hobbes’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–92.Google Scholar
Fukuoka, Atsuko 2018. The Sovereign and the Prophets: Spinoza on Grotian and Hobbesian Biblical Argumentation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–98.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David 1969. The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, M. M. 1966. Hobbes’s Science of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, M. M. 1980. “Hobbes’s ‘Mortal God’,” History of Political Thought 1: 33–50.Google Scholar
Greene, Robert A. 2015. “Thomas Hobbes and the Term ‘Right Reason’: Participation to Calculation,” History of European Ideas 41: 997–1028.Google Scholar
Guggisberg, Hans R. 1983. “The Defence of Religious Toleration and Religious Liberty in Early Modern Europe: Arguments, Pressures, and Some Consequences,” History of European Ideas 4: 35–50.Google Scholar
Guibbory, Achsah 2010. Christian Identity, Jews, and Israel in Seventeenth-Century England. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher 1994. The English Bible and the Seventeenth-Century Revolution. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch 2006a. “A Lion in the House: Hobbes and Democracy,” in Brett, Annabel, Tully, James, and Hamilton-Bleakley, Holly (eds.), Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge University Press, pp. 191–218.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch 2006b. “The End of Philosophy (The Case of Hobbes),” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106: 25–62.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Kinch 2015. “The Clarendon Edition of Hobbes’s Leviathan: Leviathan and Its Intellectual Context,” Journal of the History of Ideas 76: 237–57.Google Scholar
Holden, Thomas 2010. Spectres of False Divinity: Hume’s Moral Atheism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, Thomas 2015. “Hobbes’s First Cause,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53: 647–67.Google Scholar
Holden, Thomas 2016. “Hobbes on the Function of Evaluative Speech,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46: 123–44.Google Scholar
Holden, Thomas 2018. “Hobbes on the Authority of Scripture,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 8: 68–95.Google Scholar
Horne, Thomas 1990. Property Rights and Poverty: Political Argument in Britain, 1605–1834. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, David 1986. The Rhetoric of ‘Leviathan’: Thomas Hobbes and the Politics of Cultural Transformation. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, G. Lloyd 1983. The Discovery of Hebrew in Tudor England: A Third Language. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Victoria 2004. Wayward Contracts: The Crisis of Political Obligation in England, 1640–1674. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory 1983. “Right Reason and Natural Law in Hobbes’s Ethics,” The Monist 66: 120–33.Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory 1986. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keyt, David. 1991. “Three Basic Theorems in Aristotle’s Politics,” in Keyt, David and Miller, Fred D. (eds.), A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 118–41.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. W. 1939. “Sermons before the Commons, 1640–42,” American Historical Review 44: 528–48.Google Scholar
Lacour-Gayet, G. 1899. “Les traductions françaises de Hobbes sous le règne de Louis XIV,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 12(new series 5): 202–7.Google Scholar
Lake, Peter 1989. “Anti-popery: the Structure of a Prejudice,” in Cust, Richard and Hughes, Ann (eds.), Conflict in Early Stuart England: Studies in Religion and Politics 1603–1642. London: Longman, pp. 72–106.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel 2016. Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Daniel 2018. “Unmaking Law: Jean Bodin on Law, Equity, and Legal Change,” History of Political Thought 39: 269–96.Google Scholar
Lewalski, Barbara K. 1979. Protestant Poetics and the Seventeenth-Century Religious Lyric. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 1992. Ideals as Interests in Hobbes’s ‘Leviathan’: The Power of Mind over Matter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 2009. Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: Cases in the Law of Nature. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. 2010. “The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: A Reply to Critics,” Hobbes Studies 23: 180–7.Google Scholar
Love, Harold 1993. Scribal Publication in Seventeenth-Century England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lukac de Stier, María L. 1997. “Hobbes on Authority in De Cive and Leviathan: A Comparison,” Hobbes Studies 10: 51–67.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair 1973. “The Essential Contestability of Some Social Concepts,” Ethics 84: 1–9.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1968. “Introduction,” in Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Macpherson, C. B.. London: Penguin, pp. 9–63.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Noel 2012. “General Introduction,” in Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, vol. 1, ed. Malcolm, Noel. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–195.Google Scholar
Mark, Clifton 2018. “The Natural Laws of Good Manners: Hobbes, Glory, and Early Modern Civility,” The Review of Politics 80: 391–414.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 1992. The Two Gods of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Religion and Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 1996. “On the Proper Interpretation of Hobbes’s Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34: 273–83.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2012a. “On Thomas Hobbes’s English Calvinism: Necessity, Omnipotence, and Goodness,” Philosophical Readings 4: 18–30.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2012b. “Egoism, Reason, and the Social Contract,” Hobbes Studies 25: 209–22.Google Scholar
Mastnak, Tomaž 2015. “Hobbes in Kiel, 1938: From Ferdinand Tönnies to Carl Schmitt,” History of European Ideas 41: 966–91.Google Scholar
McIntyre, R. W. 2016. “Concerning ‘men’s affections to Godward’: Hobbes on the First and Eternal Cause of all Things,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 54: 547–72.Google Scholar
McQueen, Alison 2018a. “Mosaic Leviathan: Religion and Rhetoric in Hobbes’s Political Thought,” in van Apeldoorn, Laurens and Douglass, Robin (eds.), Hobbes on Politics and Religion. Oxford University Press, pp. 116–34.Google Scholar
McQueen, Alison 2018b. Political Realism in Apocalyptic Times. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McQueen, Alison 2019. Absolving God’s Laws: Thomas Hobbes’s Scriptural Strategies, in progress.Google Scholar
Mendenhall, George E. 1954. “Covenant Forms in Israelite Tradition,” The Biblical Archaeologist 17: 49–76.Google Scholar
Mortimer, Sarah 2011. “Kingship and the ‘Apostolic Church,’ 1620–1650,” Reformation & Renaissance Review 13: 225–46.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark 2000. “Hobbes on the Evil of Death,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 82: 36–61.Google Scholar
Nauta, Lodi 2002. “Hobbes on Religion and the Church between The Elements of Law and Leviathan: A Dramatic Change of Direction?” Journal of the History of Ideas 63: 577–98.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric 2010. The Hebrew Republic: Jewish Sources and the Transformation of European Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick 2008. Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nygren, Anders [1932–39] 1969. Agape and Eros, trans. Watson, Philip. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Nyquist, Mary 2009. “Hobbes, Slavery, and Despotical Rule,” Representations 106: 1–33.Google Scholar
Odzuck, Eva 2019. “War by Other Means? Incentives for Power-Seekers in Thomas Hobbes’s Political Philosophy,” The Review of Politics 81: 21–46.Google Scholar
Olsthoorn, Johan 2014. “Worse than Death: The Non-Preservationist Foundations of Hobbes’s Moral Philosophy,” Hobbes Studies 27: 148–70.Google Scholar
Olsthoorn, Johan 2015a. “Why Justice and Injustice Have No Place Outside the Hobbesian State,” European Journal of Political Theory 14: 19–36.Google Scholar
Olsthoorn, Johan 2015b. “Hobbes on Justice, Property Rights and Self-Ownership,” History of Political Thought 36: 471–98.Google Scholar
Olsthoorn, Johan 2018. “The Theocratic Leviathan: Hobbes’s Arguments for the Identity of Church and State,” in van Apeldoorn, Laurens and Douglass, Robin (eds.), Hobbes on Politics and Religion. Oxford University Press, pp. 10–28.Google Scholar
Parkin, Jon 2007. Taming the Leviathan: The Reception of the Political and Religious Ideas of Thomas Hobbes in England 1640–1700. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parkin, Jon 2016. “Hobbes and Paradox,” in Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, Kinch (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes. Oxford University Press, pp. 624–42.Google Scholar
Pierson, Christopher 2013. Just Property: A History in the Latin West. Volume One: Wealth, Virtue, and the Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna 1964. “Hobbes’s Concept of Representation – II,” The American Political Science Review 58: 902–18.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. [1971] 1989. Politics, Language, and Time. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 2007. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. A. J. 2004. “Hobbes, Sovereignty and Consent,” Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 59: 241–8.Google Scholar
Rosler, Andrés 2002. “Hobbes y el naturalismo político en Aristóteles,” Deus Mortalis: Cuaderno de Filosofía Política 1: 27–54.Google Scholar
Runciman, David 1997. Pluralism and the Personality of the State. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Runciman, David 2000. “What Kind of Person Is Hobbes’s State? A Reply to Skinner,” Journal of Political Philosophy 8: 268–78.Google Scholar
Sachs, David 1981. “How to Distinguish Self-Respect from Self-Esteem,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10: 346–60.Google Scholar
Schlatter, Richard 1951. Private Property: The History of an Idea. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin 1999. “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State,” Journal of Political Philosophy 7: 1–29.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin 2007. “Hobbes on Persons, Authors, and Representatives,” in Springborg, Patricia (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan. Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–80.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin 2009. “The Material Presentation of Thomas Hobbes’s Theory of the Commonwealth,” in Colas, Dominique and Kharkhordin, Oleg (eds.), The Materiality of Res Publica: How to do Things with Publics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 115–58.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin 2018. From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slomp, Gabriella 2000. Thomas Hobbes and the Political Philosophy of Glory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Slomp, Gabriella 2013. “Glory, Vainglory, and Pride,” in Lloyd, S. A. (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Hobbes. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 127–32.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P. 1984. “John Selden, the Law of Nature, and the Origins of Government,” The Historical Journal 17: 437–47.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P. 1992. Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Historical Context. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P. 2007. “Leviathan and its Anglican Context,” in Springborg, Patricia (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan. Cambridge University Press, pp. 358–74.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P. 2016. “Hobbes and Absolutism,” in Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, Kinch (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes. Oxford University Press, pp. 378–96.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom and Foisneau, Luc (eds.) 2004. Leviathan After 350 Years. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalding, James C. 1967. “Sermons Before Parliament (1640–1649) as a Public Puritan Diary,” Church History 36: 24–35.Google Scholar
Springborg, Patricia (ed.) 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, Susanne 2010. Hobbes on Resistance: Defying the Leviathan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo [1936] 1952. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Genesis. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo 2011. Hobbes’s Critique of Religion and Related Writings, ed. and trans. Bartlett, Gabriel and Minkov, Svetozar. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tarlton, Charles D. 2002. “The Despotical Doctrine of Hobbes, Part II: Aspects of the Textual Substructure of Tyranny in Leviathan,” History of Political Thought 23: 62–89.Google Scholar
Tönnies, Ferdinand 1889–90. “Siebzehn Briefe des Thomas Hobbes an Samuel Sorbière, nebst Briefen Sorbière’s, Mersenne’s u. Aa.,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 3: 58–71.Google Scholar
Traherne, Thomas 1950. Centuries of Meditations, ed. Dobell, Bertram. London: P. J. and A. E. Dobell.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, Hugh [1967] 2001. The Crisis of the Seventeenth Century: Religion, the Reformation, and Social Change. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard 1991. “Introduction,” to Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge University Press, pp. ix–xlv.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard 1992. “The ‘Christian Atheism’ of Thomas Hobbes,” in Hunter, Michael and Wootton, David (eds.), Atheism from the Reformation to the Enlightenment. Oxford University Press, pp. 111–30.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard 1993a. Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard 1993b. “The Civil Religion of Thomas Hobbes,” in Phillipson, Nicholas and Skinner, Quentin (eds.), Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain. Cambridge University Press, pp. 120–38.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard 1998. “Introduction,” to Hobbes, Thomas, On the Citizen, ed. and trans. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge University Press, pp. viii–xxxiii.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard 2016. “Hobbes, Conscience, and Christianity,” in Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, Kinch (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes. Oxford University Press, pp. 481–500.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael 1998. “Key words,” in Hobbes, Thomas On the Citizen, ed. and trans. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge University Press, pp. xxxviii–xliv.Google Scholar
Tutino, Stefania 2010. Empire of Souls: Robert Bellarmine and the Christian Commonwealth. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vinx, Lars 2012. “Hobbes on Civic Liberty and the Rule of Law,” in Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas (eds.), Hobbes and the Law. Cambridge University Press, pp. 145–64.Google Scholar
Wadle, Douglas C. 2017. “The Problem of the Unity of the Representative Assembly in Hobbes’s Leviathan,” Hobbes Studies 30: 178–201.Google Scholar
Walker, Garthine 2016. “Imagining the Unimaginable: Parricide in Early Modern England and Wales, c.1600–c.1760,” Journal of Family History 41: 271–93.Google Scholar
Warrender, Howard 1957. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Warrender, Howard 1983. “Editor’s Introduction,” to Hobbes, Thomas, De Cive: The Latin Version, ed. Warrender, Howard. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–67.Google Scholar
Winkel, Laurens 2000. “Les origines antiques de l’appetitus societatis de Grotius,” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 68: 393–403.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon [1960] 2004. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought – Expanded Edition. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zarka, Yves Charles 1992. “La Propriété chez Hobbes,” Archives de Philosophie 55: 587–605.Google Scholar
Zarka, Yves Charles 1995. Hobbes et la pensée politique moderne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael P. 1994. Natural Rights and the New Republicanism. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar