Book contents
- Human and Non-Human Targets in Armed Conflicts
- Human and Non-Human Targets in Armed Conflicts
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Sources, Scope, and Application of the Law on Legitimate Targets in Armed Conflicts
- 2 Human Targets
- 3 Non-Human Targets
- 4 Problems in Lawful Target Elimination
- 5 Individual Criminal Responsibility for Violations of the Law of Targeting
- Final Remarks: Towards a Unified Approach to Target Selection
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 March 2022
Book contents
- Human and Non-Human Targets in Armed Conflicts
- Human and Non-Human Targets in Armed Conflicts
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Sources, Scope, and Application of the Law on Legitimate Targets in Armed Conflicts
- 2 Human Targets
- 3 Non-Human Targets
- 4 Problems in Lawful Target Elimination
- 5 Individual Criminal Responsibility for Violations of the Law of Targeting
- Final Remarks: Towards a Unified Approach to Target Selection
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human and Non-Human Targets in Armed Conflicts , pp. 242 - 274Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Abbott, Kirby, ‘A brief overview of legal interoperability challenges for NATO arising from interrelationship between IHL and IHRL in light of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2014) 96:893 IRRC 107.Google Scholar
Acheson, Ray, Moyes, Richard, Nash, Thomas, Sex and Drone Strikes. Gender and identity in targeting and casualty analysis (Article 36, Reaching Critical Will 2014). Report available at www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Publications/sex-and-drone-strikes.pdf.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo, ‘Classification of armed conflicts: Relevant legal concepts’, in Elisabeth, Wilmshurst, (ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo, ‘Clearing the fog of war? The ICRC’s interpretative guidance on direct participation in hostilities’ (2010) 59:1 I&CLQ 180.Akande, Dapo, ‘Nuclear weapons, unclear law? Deciphering the nuclear weapons advisory opinion of the international court’ (1997) 68 BYIL 165.Google Scholar
Aldrich, George, ‘Compliance with the law: Problems and prospects’, in Hazel, Fox, , Michael, Meyer, (ed.), Effecting Compliance (BII&CL 1993).Google Scholar
Aldrich, George, ‘Prospects for United States ratification of Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions’ (1991) 85:1 AJIL 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, George, ‘The Taliban, Al Qaeda, and the determination of illegal combatants’ (2002) 96 AJIL 891.al-Duaij, Nada, ‘The volunteer human shields in international humanitarian law’ (2010) 12 ORIL 117.Google Scholar
Alexander, Amanda, ‘A short history of international humanitarian law’ (2015) 26:1 EJIL 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelleke van, Amstel, ‘In search of legal grounds to detain for armed groups’ (2012) 3 IHLS 160.Google Scholar
Anderson, Chris, ‘Assassination, lawful homicide, and the butcher of Baghdad’ (1992) 13 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol’y 291.Google Scholar
Andrzejczak-Świątek, Małgorzata, ‘Koncepcja “uprzywilejowanego kombatanta” w stosunku do dziecka biorącego bezpośredni udział w działaniach wojennych’ (2011) 2 PRPCzłiPH 203.Google Scholar
Avio, Gérard Le statut de combattant dans les conflits armés non internationaux (Bruylant 2013).Google Scholar
Bailey, Robert, ‘Why do states violate the law of war? A comparison of Iraqi violations in two Gulf Wars’ (2000) 27:1 SyrJI&Comm 103.Google Scholar
Bantekas, Ilias, Nash, Susan, International Criminal Law, 3rd edition (Routledge 2007).Google Scholar
Barela, Steven (ed.), Legitimacy and Drones. Investigating the Legality, Morality and Efficacy of UCAVs (Ashgate 2015).Google Scholar
Baruch, Pnina, Neuman, Noam, ‘Warning civilians prior to attack under international law – theory and practice’ (2011) 87 ILS 359.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, Cherif, Introduction to International Criminal Law: Second Revised Edition (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013).Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard, ‘Ius in bello interno: The present and future law’, in Moore, John (ed.), Law and Civil War in the Modern World (The Johns Hopkins University Press 1974).Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard, De Saussure, Hamilton, ‘Comments’, in Trooboff, Peter, (ed.), Law and Responsibility in Warfare: The Vietnam Experience (The University of North Carolina Press 1975).Google Scholar
Beer, Yishai, ‘Humanity considerations cannot reduce war’s hazards alone: Revitalizing the concept of military necessity’ (2015) 26:4 EJIL 801.Google Scholar
Bellinger III, John, Haynes II, William, ‘A US Government response to the International Committee of the Red Cross study customary international humanitarian law’ (2007) 89:866 IRRC 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, David, ‘International humanitarian law – weapon of choice for the lawless’ (2011) 3 Regent J. L. & Pub. Pol’y 47.Google Scholar
Bennoune, Karima, ‘Toward a human rights approach to armed conflict: Iraq 2003’ (2004–5) 11 U.C. Davis J. Int’l L. & Pol’y 171.Google Scholar
Bialke, Joseph, ‘Al-Qaeda & Taliban unlawful combatant detainees, unlawful belligerency, and the international laws of armed conflict’ (2004) 55 AFLR 1.Google Scholar
Bieńczyk-Missala, Agnieszka, ‘International humanitarian law in the context of military interventions of the West’, in Madej, Marek (ed.) Western Military Interventions after the Cold War: Evaluating the Wars of the West (Routledge 2019).Google Scholar
Bieńczyk-Missala, Agnieszka, Grzebyk, Patrycja, ‘Safety and protection of humanitarian workers’, in Gibbons, Pat, Heintze, Hans-Joachim (eds.), The Humanitarian Challenge: 20 Years European Network on Humanitarian Action (Springer 2015).Google Scholar
Bílková, Veronika, ‘Belligerent reprisals in non-international armed conflicts’ (2014) 63:1 I&CLQ 31.Google Scholar
Bindschedler-Robert, Denise, ‘A reconsideration of the law of armed conflicts. Report prepared for the conference’, in Report of the Conference on Contemporary Problems of the Law of Armed Conflicts, Geneva, 15–20 September 1969 (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 1971).Google Scholar
Blank, Laurie, ‘“After Top Gun”: How drone strikes impact the law of war’ (2011–12) 33 UPaJIL 675.Google Scholar
Bloom, Evan, ‘Protecting peacekeepers: The Convention on the safety of United Nations and associated personnel’ (1995) 89:3 AJIL 621.Google Scholar
Bogar, Thomas, ‘Unlawful combatant or innocent civilian? A call to change the current means for determining status of prisoners in the global war on terror’ (2009) 21:1 Fla. J. Int’l L. 29.Google Scholar
Bond, James, ‘Application of the law of war to internal conflicts’ (1973) 3 Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 345.Google Scholar
Boothby, William, ‘“And for such time as”: The time dimension to direct participation in hostilities’ (2010a) 42 IL&Pol 741.Google Scholar
Boothby, William, ‘Direct participation in hostilities – a discussion of the ICRC interpretive guidance’ (2010b) 1 JIHLS 143.Google Scholar
Bosch, Shannon, ‘Voluntary human shields: Status-less in the crosshairs?’ (2007) 40 CILSA 322.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, ‘Legal restraints on targeting: Protection of civilian population and the changing faces of modern conflicts’ (2001) 31 IsrYHR 35.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael ‘Customary international humanitarian law: Some reflections on the ICRC study’ (2005) 8 YIHL 143.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl, Solf, Waldemar, New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts. Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013).Google Scholar
Bouchié, de Belle, Stéphanie, ‘Chained to cannons or wearing targets on their T-shirts: Human shields in international humanitarian law’ (2008) 90:872 IRRC 883.Google Scholar
Bourbonnière, Michel, Lee, Ricky, ‘Ius ad bellum and ius in bello considerations on the targeting of satellites: The targeting of post-modern military space assets’ (2014) 44 IsrYHR 167.Google Scholar
Bouvier, Antoine, ‘Convention on the safety of United Nations and associated personnel: Presentation and analysis’ (1995) 309 IRRC 638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowring, Bill, ‘Fragmentation, lex specialis and the tensions in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2010) 14:3 JC&SL 485.Google Scholar
Bradford, William, ‘Barbarians at the gates: A post September 11th proposal to rationalize the laws of war’ (2004) 73 MissLJ 639.Google Scholar
Buckley, Ahmed, ‘Smiting spell: The legality of targeted killings in the war against terrorism’ (2012) 5:2 J. East Asia Int. Law. 439.Google Scholar
Buckley, Orla, ‘Unregulated armed conflict: Non-state armed groups, international humanitarian law, and violence in Western Sahara’ (2012) 37 NCJIL&CR 793.Google Scholar
Bugnion, François, Le Comité International de la Croix-Rouge et la Protection des Victimes de la Guerre (CICR 1994).Google Scholar
Bugnion, François, ‘Just wars, wars of aggression and international humanitarian law’ (2002) 84:847 IRRC 523.Google Scholar
Burchill, Richard, White, Nigel, Morris, Justin (eds.), International Conflict and Security Law: Essays in Memory of Hilaire McCoubrey (Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Burri, Nina, Bravery or Bravado? The Protection of News Providers in Armed Conflict (Brill 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caflisch, Lucius, ‘Summary record of the conference’, in Report of the Conference on Contemporary Problems of the Law of Armed Conflicts, Geneva 15–20 September 1969 (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 1971).Google Scholar
Cameron, Lindsey, Chetail, Vincent, Privatizing War: Private Military and Security Companies under Public International Law (Cambridge University Press 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cançado Trindade, Antônio, International Law for Humankind Towards a New Jus Gentium, 2nd rev. ed. (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey-Maslen, Stuart, ‘Pandora’s Box? Drone strikes under ius ad bellum, ius in bello and international human rights law’ (2012) 94:886 IRRC 597.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The New Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict (Editoriale Scientifica 1979–80).Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘Should rebels be treated as criminals? Some modest proposals for rendering internal armed conflicts less inhuman’, in Cassese, Antonio (ed.), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law (Oxford University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Eric, ‘The dilemma of direct participation in hostilities’ (2009–10) 19 J. Transnat’l L. & Pol’y 281.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford University Press 2006).Google Scholar
Clarke, M. H. F., Glynn, T., Rogers, A., ‘Combatant and prisoners of war status’, in Meyer, Michael (ed.), Armed Conflict and the New Law: Aspects of the 1977 Geneva Protocols and the 1981 Weapons Convention (BII&CL 1989).Google Scholar
de Cock Chris, ‘Targeting in coalition operations’, in Ducheine, Paul, Schmitt, Michael, Osinga, Frans (eds.), Targeting: The Challenges of Modern Warfare (Springer 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corn, Geoffrey, ‘Hamdan, Lebanon, and the regulation of hostilities: The need to recognize a hybrid category of armed conflict’ (2006) 40 VandJTL 295.Google Scholar
Corn, Geoffrey, ‘Mixing apples and hand grenades. The logical limit of applying human rights norms to armed conflict’ (2010) 1 JIHLS 52.Google Scholar
Corn, Geoffrey, Blank, Laurie, Jenks, Chris, Jensen, Eric, ‘Belligerent targeting and the invalidity of a least harmful means rule’ (2013) 89 ILS 536.Google Scholar
Corn, Geoffrey, Corn, Gary, ‘The law of operational targeting: Viewing the LOAC through an operational lens’ (2012) 47:2 TexILJ 337.Google Scholar
Corn, Geoffrey, Jenks, Chris, ‘Two sides of the combatant coin: Untangling direct participation in hostilities from belligerent status in non-international armed conflicts’ (2011–12) 33 UPaJIL 313.Google Scholar
Crawford, Emily, ‘Virtual battlegrounds: Direct participation in cyber warfare’ (2013–14) 9 ISJL&P 1.Google Scholar
Cryer, Robert, ‘The fine art of friendship: Ius in bello in Afghanistan’ (2002) 7 JC&SL 37.Google Scholar
Cryer, Robert, ‘The interplay of human rights and humanitarian law: The approach of the ICTY’ (2010) 14:3 JC&SL 511.Google Scholar
Cryer, Robert, ‘The relationship of international humanitarian law and war crimes: International criminal tribunals and their statutes’, in Harvey, Caroline, Summers, James, White, Nigel (eds.), Contemporary Challenges to the Laws of War Essays in Honour of Professor Peter Rowe (Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Cullen, Anthony, ‘The definition of non-international armed conflict in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: An analysis of the threshold of application contained in article 8(2)(f)’ (2007) 12 JC&SL 419.Google Scholar
Czapliński, Władysław, ‘Customary international law as a basis of an individual criminal responsibility’, in Krzan, Bartłomiej (ed.), Prosecuting International Crimes: A Multidisciplinary Approach (Brill 2016).Google Scholar
Daboné, Zakaria, ‘International law: Armed groups in a state-centric system’ (2011) 93:882 IRRC 395.Google Scholar
Danner, Allison, ‘Defining unlawful enemy combatants: A centripetal story’ (2007) 43:1 TexILJ 1.Google Scholar
Davidson, Osnat, ‘A legal analysis of computer network attacks under international law’ (2007–8) 3 IDFLR 70.Google Scholar
Dehn, John, ‘Permissible perfidy? Analysing the Colombian hostage rescue, the capture of rebel leaders and the world’s reaction’ (2008) 6 JICJ 627.Google Scholar
Del Mar, Katherine, ‘The requirement of “belonging” under international humanitarian law’ (2010) 21 EJIL 105.Google Scholar
Denbeaux, Mark et al., ‘No-hearing hearings: An analysis of the proceedings of the combatant status review tribunals at Guantánamo’ (2011) 41 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1231.Google Scholar
Dill, Janina, Legitimate Targets? Social Construction, International Law and US Bombing (Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, ‘Legitimate military objectives under the current ius in bello’ (2001) 31 IsrYHR 1.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, ‘The ICRC customary international humanitarian law study’, in Helm, Anthony (ed.), The Law of War in the 21st Century: Weaponry and the Use of Force (Naval War College 2006).Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, ‘Distinction and loss of civilian protection in international armed conflicts’ (2008) 38 IsrYHR 1.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, ‘Concluding remarks on non-international armed conflicts’ (2012a) 42 IsrYHR 153.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, ‘The principle of distinction and cyber war in international armed conflicts’ (2012b) 17:2 JC&SL 261.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, 3rd edition (Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, ‘The legal situation of “unlawful/unprivileged combatants”’ (2003) 85:849 IRRC 45.Google Scholar
Dörmann, Knut, ‘Combatants, Unlawful’, MPEPIL, OPIL, online edition (2015): https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e425?prd=EPIL.Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, ‘The value of the 1977 Geneva Protocols for the protection of civilians’, in Meyer, Michael (ed.), Armed Conflict and the New Law: Aspects of the 1977 Geneva Protocols and the 1981 Weapons Convention (BII&CL 1989).Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, ‘The right to life in armed conflict: Does international humanitarian law provide all the answers?’ (2006) 88:864 IRRC 881.Google Scholar
Draper, G. I. A. D., ‘Wars of national liberation and war criminality’, in Howard, Michael (ed.), Restraints on War. Studies in the Limitation of Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press 1979).Google Scholar
Droege, Cordula, ‘The interplay between international humanitarian law and international human rights law in situations of armed conflict’ (2007) 40:2 IsrLR 310.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark, Reimagining Child Soldiers in International Law and Policy (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Ducheine, Paul, Schmitt, Michael, Osinga, Frans (eds.), Targeting: The Challenges of Modern Warfare (Springer 2016).Google Scholar
Dungan, Peter, ‘Rules of engagement and fratricide prevention lessons from the Tarnak farms incident’ (2004) 9 UCLA JILFA 301.Google Scholar
Durham, Helen, ‘Keynote address’, in Greppi, Edoardo (ed.), Conduct of Hostilities: The Practice, the Law and the Future. 37th Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law (Sanremo, 4th–6th September 2014) (FrancoAngeli 2015).Google Scholar
Dutli, Maria, Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict: Report on the Meeting of Experts (Geneva 5–6 October 2000) (ICRC 2002).Google Scholar
Edmonds, James, Oppenheim, Lassa, Land Warfare: An Exposition of the Laws and Usages of War on Land for the Guidance of Officers of His Majesty’s Army (H. M. Stationery Office 1912).Google Scholar
Ekins, Richard, Morgan, Jonathan, Tugendhat, Tom, Clearing the Fog of Law: Saving our Armed Forces from Defeat by Judicial Diktat (Policy Exchange 2015).Google Scholar
Engdahl, Ola, Protection of Personnel in Peace Operations: The Role of the ‘Safety Convention’ Against the Background of General International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2002).Google Scholar
Engdahl, Ola, ‘Panel discussion: Applicability/application of human rights law to IOs involved in peace operations’ (2011) 42 Collegium 66.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, ‘Methods and means of warfare, counterinsurgency, tactics and the law’, in Trooboff, Peter (ed.), Law and Responsibility in Warfare: The Vietnam Experience (The University of North Carolina Press 1975).Google Scholar
Farley, Benjamin, ‘Targeting Anwar al-Aulaqi: A case study in US drone strikes and targeted killing’ (2011–12) 2:1 NSLB 57.Google Scholar
Fenrick, William, ‘Legal Aspects of Targeting in the Law of Naval Warfare’ (1991) 29 CanYIL 238.Google Scholar
Fenrick, William, ‘The targeted killings judgment and the scope of direct participation in hostilities’ (2007) 5 JICJ 332.Google Scholar
Fenrick, William, ‘Applying IHL targeting rules to practical situations: Proportionality and military objectives’ (2009a) 27 WYAJ 271.Google Scholar
Fenrick, William, ‘ICRC guidance on direct participation in hostilities’ (2009b) 12 YIHL 287.Google Scholar
Ferraro, Tristan, Cameron, Lindsey, ‘Article 2 application of the convention’, in Commentary on the First Geneva Convention. Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field (ICRC, Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Forage, Paul, ‘Bombs for peace: A comparative study of the use of air power in the Balkans’ (2002) 28:2 Armed Forces Soc. 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, Katharine, ‘Complementarity between the ICRC and the United Nations and international humanitarian law and international human rights law, 1948–1968’ (2012) 94:888 IRRC 1433.Google Scholar
Frakt, David, ‘Mohammed Jawad and the Military Commissions of Guantanamo’ (2011) 60 Duke L. J. 1366.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Jiří, ‘Shot in the dark: International law of targeting in theory and state practice’ (2007–8) 3 ASM 21.Google Scholar
Gadler, Alice, ‘The protection of peacekeepers and international criminal lain: Legal challenges and broader protection’ (2010) 11 GLJ 585.Google Scholar
Gaggioli, Gloria, ‘Lethal force and drones: The human rights question’, in Barela, Steven (ed.), Legitimacy and Drones: Investigating the Legality, Morality and Efficacy of UCAVs (Ashgate 2015).Google Scholar
Galvin, Richard, ‘The ICC prosecutor, collateral damage, and NGOs: Evaluating the risk of a politicized prosecution’ (2005–6) 13 U. Miami Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Garraway, Charles, ‘“England does not love coalitions”: Does anything change?’, in Helm, Anthony (ed.), The Law of War in the 21st Century: Weaponry and the Use of Force (Naval War College 2006).Google Scholar
Garraway, Charles, ‘“To kill or not to kill?” – dilemmas on the use of force’ (2009) 14 JC&SL 499.Google Scholar
Garraway, Charles, ‘The protection of civilians and civilian objects from the effects of air and missile warfare: Are there any differences between the immediate battlefield and the extended battlefield?’ (2014) 44 IsrYHR 125.Google Scholar
Gasser, Hans-Peter, ‘International Humanitarian Law’, in Haug, Hans (ed.), Humanity for All: The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (Henry Dunant Institute, Paul Haupt Publishers 1993).Google Scholar
Gaudreau, Julie, ‘The reservations to the Protocols additional to the Geneva Conventions for the protection of war victims’ (2003) 849 IRRC 143.Google Scholar
Geiss, Robin, ‘Humanitarian law obligations of organized armed groups’, in Odello, Marco, Beruto, Gian Luca (eds.), Non-state Actors and International Humanitarian Law. Organized armed groups: A challenge for the 21st century. 32nd Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law Sanremo, 11–13 September 2009 (Franco Angeli 2010)Google Scholar
Giladi, Rotem, ‘Advocacy in the occupied Palestinian territories’ (2009) 14 JC&SL 393.Google Scholar
Gillard, Emanuela-Chiara, ‘Business goes to war: Private military/security companies and international humanitarian law’ (2006) 88:863 IRRC 525Google Scholar
Gillard, Emanuela-Chiara, ‘The position under international humanitarian law’ (2007) 36 Collegium 27.Google Scholar
Gisel, Laurent, ‘Can the incidental killing of military doctors never be excessive?’ (2013) 95:889 IRRC 215.Google Scholar
Global Counter Piracy Guidance for Companies, Masters and Seafarers (BIMCO et al. 2018). wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Security/Documents/global-counter-piracy-guidance-bmp_low_17-07-18.pdf.Google Scholar
Goldman, Robert, ‘International humanitarian law and the armed conflicts in El Salvador and Nicaragua’ (1987) 2 Am. Univ. J. Int. Law Policy 539.Google Scholar
Goldman, Robert, ‘The legal regime governing the conduct of Operation Desert Storm’ (1991–2) 23 U. Tol. L. Rev. 363.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, ‘The power to kill or capture enemy combatants’ (2013a) 24:3 EJIL 819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, ‘The power to kill or capture enemy combatants: A rejoinder to Michael N. Schmitt’ (2013b) 24:3 EJIL 863.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, ‘The Obama administration and targeting “war-sustaining” objects in non-international armed conflict’ (2016) 110 AJIL 663.Google Scholar
Gordon, Neve, Perugini, Nicola, ‘“Hospital shields” and the limits of International law’ (2019) 30:2 EJIL 439.Google Scholar
Górbiel, Andrzej, Konieczność wojskowa w prawie międzynarodowym (Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 1970).Google Scholar
Greenspan, Morris, The Modern Law of Land Warfare (University of California Press 1959).Google Scholar
Greenwald, Glenn, The Radically Changing Story of the US Airstrike on Afghan Hospital: From Mistake to Justification (The Intercept 2015).Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘Current issues in the law of armed conflict: Weapons, targets and international criminal liability’ (1997) 1 Sing JICL 441.Google Scholar
Grenfell, Katarina, ‘Panel discussion: Applicability/application of human rights law to IOs involved in peace operations’ (2012) 42 Collegium 57.Google Scholar
Greppi, Edoardo (ed.), Conduct of Hostilities: The Practice, the Law and the Future. 37th Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law (Sanremo, 4th–6th September 2014) (FrancoAngeli 2015).Google Scholar
Constantin, Groeben von der, ‘Criminal responsibility of German soldiers in Afghanistan: The case of Colonel Klein’ (2010) 11:5 GLJ 469.Google Scholar
Groeben, Constantin von der, ‘The conflict in Colombia and the relationship between humanitarian law and human rights law in practice: Analysis of the new operational law of the Colombian armed forces’ (2011) 16:1 JC&SL 141.Google Scholar
Gross, Richard, ‘Planning and decision-making: Differences in processes for pre-planned targets, targets of opportunity and troops in contact situations. National perspectives,’ in Greppi, Edoardo (ed.), Conduct of Hostilities: The Practice, the Law and the Future. 37th Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law (Sanremo, 4th–6th September 2014) (FrancoAngeli 2015).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, The rights of War and Peace (De iure belli ac pacis) (M. W. Dunne 1901)Google Scholar
Grzebyk, Patrycja, ‘Fragmentation of the law of targeting – a comfortable excuse or dangerous trap’, in Jakubowski, Andrzej, Wierczyńska, Karolina (eds.), Fragmentation vs the Constitutionalisation of International Law: A Practical Inquiry (Routledge 2016).Google Scholar
Grzebyk, Patrycja, ‘Authorising attacks in response to terrorist attacks’, in Ulrich, George, Ziemele, Ineta (eds.), How International Law Works in Times of Crisis (Oxford University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Guiora, Amos, Legitimate Target: A Criteria-Based Approach to Targeted Killing (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Hacaga, Maciej, ‘An easy target? Types of attack on oil tankers by state actors’ (2020) 28 Security & Defence Quarterly 54.Google Scholar
Hampson, Françoise, ‘Responsibility in the human rights framework’ (2007) 36 Collegium 34.Google Scholar
Hampson, Françoise, ‘The relationship between international humanitarian law and human rights law from the perspective of a human rights treaty body’ (2008) 90:871 IRRC 549.Google Scholar
Hansen, Michelle, ‘Preventing the emasculation of warfare: Halting the expansion of human rights law into armed conflict’ (2007) 194 MLR 1.Google Scholar
Haque, Adil, ‘Protecting and respecting civilians: Correcting the substantive and structural defects of the Rome Statute’ (2011) 14 New Crim. L. Rev. 519.Google Scholar
Harvey, Caroline, Summers, James, White, Nigel (eds.), Contemporary Challenges to the Laws of War: Essays in Honour of Professor Peter Rowe (Cambridge University Press 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Nobuo, ‘The role of judges in identifying the status of combatants’ (2006) 2 ASM 69.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Nobuo, ‘Continuous attack liability without right or fact of direct participation in hostilities – the ICRC interpretive guidance and perils of a pseudo-status’, in Nowakowska-Małusecka, Joanna (ed.), Międzynarodowe prawo humanitarne: Antecedencje i wyzwania współczesności (Oficyna Wydawnicza Branta 2010).Google Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla, ‘Creating incentives for compliance: Between amnesty and criminalization’, in Odello, Marco, Beruto, Gian Luca (eds.), Non-state Actors and International Humanitarian Law. Organized Armed Groups: A Challenge for the 21st century. 32nd Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law Sanremo, 11–13 September 2009 (FrancoAngeli 2010).Google Scholar
Heintschel von, Heinegg Wolff, ‘Naval Warfare’, in Greppi, Edoardo (ed.), Conduct of Hostilities: The Practice, the Law and the Future. 37th Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law (Sanremo, 4th–6th September 2014) (FrancoAngeli 2015).Google Scholar
Heintze, Hans-Joachim, ‘On the relationship between human rights law protection and international humanitarian law’ (2004) 86:856 IRRC 789.Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin, ‘“One hell of a killing machine”: Signature strikes and international law’ (2013) 11 JICJ 89.Google Scholar
Helm, Anthony (ed.), The Law of War in the 21st Century: Weaponry and the Use of Force (Naval War College 2006).Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, ‘New rules for the protection of cultural property in armed conflict: The significance of the Second Protocol to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict’, in Dutli, Maria (ed.), Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. Report on the Meeting of Experts (Geneva 5–6 October 2000) (ICRC 2002).Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, ‘Study on customary international humanitarian law: A contribution to the understanding and respect for the rule of law in armed conflict’, in Helm, Anthony (ed.), The Law of War in the 21st Century: Weaponry and the Use of Force (Naval War College 2006).Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, ‘Armed forces’ MPEPIL (OPIL, online edition: https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e244, 2010).Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, vols. I–III (ICRC, Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Higgins, Noelle, Regulating the Use of Force in Wars of National Liberation: The Need for a New Regime. A Study of the South Moluccas and Aceh (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2010).Google Scholar
Higgins, Pearce, War and the Private Citizen: Studies in International Law (King & Son 1912).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘International law and civil conflict’, in Luard, Evan (ed.), The International Regulation of Civil Wars (Thames and Hudson 1972).Google Scholar
Holmqvist, Caroline, ‘Private military and security companies – an analytical overview’ (2007) 36 Collegium 11.Google Scholar
Holst, Fredrik, Fink, Martin, ‘A legal view on NATO’s campaign in Libya’, in Engelbrekt, Kjell, Mohlin, Marcus, Wagnsson, Charlotte (eds.), The NATO Intervention in Libya: Lessons Learned from the Campaign (Routledge 2014).Google Scholar
Hostettler, Peter, ‘Reflections on the law of neutrality in current air and missile warfare’ (2014) 44 IsrYHR 145.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael (ed.), Restraints on War: Studies in the Limitation of Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press 1979).Google Scholar
International Law Association, The Conduct of Hostilities and International Humanitarian Law. Challenges of 21st Century Warfare. Final Report (2016).Google Scholar
Jachec-Neale, Agnieszka, The Concept of Military Objectives in International Law and Targeting Practice (Routledge 2015).Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Marie, ‘Protection of the environment and air and missile warfare: Some reflections’ (2015) 45 IsrYHR 51.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Eric, ‘“Military necessity” and “civilian immunity” – where is the balance?’ (2003) 2 ChJIL 175.Google Scholar
Jenks, Chris, ‘Law as shield, law as sword: The ICC’s Lubanga decision, child soldiers and the perverse mutualism of participation in hostilities’ (2013) 3 UMNS&ACLR 106.Google Scholar
Jensen, Eric, ‘Combatant status: It is time for intermediate levels of recognition for partial compliance’ (2005–6) 46 VirJIL 209.Google Scholar
Jones, Samuel, ‘Has conduct in Iraq confirmed the moral inadequacy of international humanitarian law? Examining the confluence between contract theory and the scope of civilian immunity during armed conflict’ (2006) 16 DJC&IL 249.Google Scholar
Jordan, III Robert, ‘Comments’, in Trooboff, Peter (ed.), Law and Responsibility in Warfare: The Vietnam Experience (The University of North Carolina Press 1975).Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Nikolai, ‘The protection of freshwater in armed conflict’ (2007) 3 JIL&IR 57.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary, New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era, 3rd edition (Stanford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits, ‘The Soldier and His Golf Clubs’, in Kalshoven, Frits (ed.), Reflections on the Law of War: Collected Essays (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2007)Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits, Zegveld, Liesbeth, Constraints on the Waging of War: An Introduction to International Humanitarian Law (ICRC 2001).Google Scholar
Keck, Trevor, ‘Not all civilians are created equal: The principle of distinction, the question of direct participation in hostilities and evolving restraints on the use of force in warfare’ (2012) 211 MLR 115.Google Scholar
Keeman, Martin, ‘Is formalism a friend or foe? Saving the principle of distinction by applying function over form’ (2013) 4 JIHLS 354.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David, ‘War and international law: Distinguishing military and humanitarian professions’, in Helm, Anthony (ed.), The Law of War in the 21st Century: Weaponry and the Use of Force (Naval War College 2006).Google Scholar
Kennedy, David, ‘Lawfare and warfare’, in Crawford, James, Koskenniemi, Matti (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Kessler, Oliver, Werner, Wouter, ‘Expertise, uncertainty, and international law: A study of the Tallinn Manual on cyberwarfare’ (2013) 26 LJIL 793.Google Scholar
Kleffner, Jann, ‘The applicability of international humanitarian law to organized armed groups’ (2011) 93:883 IRRC 443.Google Scholar
Knoops, Geert-Jan, ‘The duality of the proportionality principle within asymmetric warfare and ensuing superior criminal responsibilities’ (2009) 9 ICLR 501.Google Scholar
Kochheiser, Steven, ‘Silent partners: Private forces, mercenaries, and international humanitarian law in the 21st century’ (2012) 2 UMNS&ACLR 86.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, Hyde, Richard, An Introduction to the International Law of Armed Conflicts (Hart Publishing 2008).Google Scholar
Kosovo, Lessons from the Crisis. Ref: CM 4724. Released June 5, 2000 (UK Ministry of Defence 2000).Google Scholar
Kossoy, Edward, Living with Guerilla: Guerilla as Legal Problem and a Political Fact (Librairie Droz 1976).Google Scholar
Kot, Jean-Philippe, ‘Israeli civilians versus Palestinian combatants? Reading the Goldstone Report in light of the Israeli conception of the principle of distinction’ (2011) 24 LJIL 961.Google Scholar
Kress, Claus, ‘War crimes committed in non-international armed conflict and the emerging system of international criminal justice’ (2001) 30 IsrYHR 103.Google Scholar
Latos, Bartłomiej, Klauzula derogacyjna i limitacyjna w Europejskiej konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności (Wydawnictwo Sejmowe 2008).Google Scholar
Laursen, Andreas, ‘NATO, the war over Kosovo, and the ICTY investigation’ (2002) 17:4 Am. Univ. Int. Law Rev. 765.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, Jeff, ‘Victims of convenience: How redefining combatant status endangers US soldiers’ (2007) 4:1 Eyes on The ICC 11.Google Scholar
Levie, Howard, When Battle Rages, How Can Law Protect? (Working Paper and Proceedings of the Fourteenth Hammarskjöld Forum, Oceana Publications 1971).Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael, ‘The law of aerial bombardment in the 1991 Gulf War’ (2003) 97 AJIL 481.Google Scholar
Lieblich, Eliav, ‘Targeted killing of General Soleimani: Why the Laws of War should apply, and why it matters’ (2020) Just Security, 13 January.Google Scholar
Liles, Logan, ‘The civilian cyber battlefield: Non-state cyber operators’ status under the law of armed conflict’ (2014) 39 NCJIL&CR 1091Google Scholar
Linneweber, Edward, ‘To target, or not to target: Why ’tis nobler to thwart the Afghan narcotics trade with nonlethal means’ (2011) 207 MLR 155.Google Scholar
Lisher II, James ‘“Shock and Awe”: Should developed states be subject to a higher standard of care in target selection?’ (2005–6) 2 IDFLR 149.Google Scholar
Luban, David, ‘Military necessity and the cultures of military law’ (2013) 26 LJIL 315.Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam, ‘Applicability of human rights law in situations of occupation’ (2006) 34 Collegium 50.Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam, ‘Lawful targets in cyber operations: Does the principle of distinction apply?’ (2013) 43 IsrYHR 23.Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam, ‘Current challenges with regard to the notion of military objective – legal and operational perspectives’, in Greppi, Edoardo (ed.), Conduct of Hostilities: The Practice, the Law and the Future (FrancoAngeli 2015).Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam, Derejko, Nathan, ‘A global battlefield? Drones and the geographical scope of armed conflict’ (2013) 11 JICJ 65.Google Scholar
Lyall, Rewie, ‘Voluntary human shields, direct participation in hostilities and the international humanitarian law obligations of states’ (2008) 9 MelbJIL 313.Google Scholar
Lyons, Grantland, ‘Separate but equal accountability: The case of Omar Khadr’ (2013) 3 UMNS&ACLR 125.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, Kate, ‘Beyond the Red Cross: The protection of independent humanitarian organizations and their staff in international humanitarian law’, in Heintze, Hans-Joachim, Zwitter, Andrej, International Law and Humanitarian Assistance: A Crosscut Through Legal Issues Pertaining to Humanitarianism (Springer 2011).Google Scholar
Makowski, Andrzej, Ilnicki, Marek, Wojna na morzu we współczesnym prawie międzynarodowym (Adam Marszałek 1996).Google Scholar
Mandernach, Christopher, ‘Warriors without law: Embracing a spectrum of status for military actors’ (2007–8) 7 AppJL 137.Google Scholar
Margulies, Peter, ‘The fog of war reform: Change and structure in the law of armed conflict after September 11’ (2012) 95 Marquette Law Rev. 1417.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Mark, Watts, Sean, ‘“Unlawful enemy combatant”: Status, theory of culpability, or neither?’ (2007) 5 JICJ 19.Google Scholar
McCormack, Timothy, ‘An Australian perspective on the ICRC customary international humanitarian law study’, in Helm, Anthony (ed.), The Law of War in the 21st Century: Weaponry and the Use of Force (Naval War College 2006).Google Scholar
Mégret, Frederic, ‘War and the vanishing battlefield’ (2011–12) 9 Loy. U. Chi. Int’l L. Rev.131.Google Scholar
Meier, Michael, ‘A treaty we can live with: The overlooked strategic value of Protocol II’ (2007) Army Lawyer 28.Google Scholar
Meisels, Tamar, ‘Assassination: Targeting nuclear scientists’ (2014) 33 Law and Philosophy 207.Google Scholar
Melzer, Nils, Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law (ICRC 2009).Google Scholar
Melzer, Nils, ‘Keeping the balance between military necessity and humanity: A response to four critiques of the ICRC’s interpretive guidance on the notion of direct participation in hostilities’ (2010) 42 IL&Pol 831.Google Scholar
Mérignhac, Alexandre, Lémonon, Ernest, Le Droit des Gens et la Guerre de 1914–1918, vol. I (Librairie de la Société du Recueil Sirey 1921).Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law (Clarendon Press 1989).Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, ‘The Martens clause, principles of humanity, and dictates of public conscience’ (2000) 94:1 AJIL 78.Google Scholar
Meyer, Jeanne, ‘Tearing down the facade: A critical look at the current law on targeting the will of the enemy and air force doctrine’ (2001) 51 AFLR 143.Google Scholar
Meyer, Michael (ed.), Armed Conflict and the New Law: Aspects of the 1977 Geneva Protocols and the 1981 Weapons Convention (BII&CL 1989).Google Scholar
Meyrowitz, Henri, ‘The principle of superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering: From the Declaration of St. Petersburg of 1868 to Additional Protocol 1 of 1977’ (1994) 34 IRRC 98.Google Scholar
Mikos-Skuza, Elżbieta, ‘Hospitals’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola, Sassòli, Marco (eds.), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy (Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Millet-Devalle, Anne-Sophie (ed.), Guerre aerienne et droit international humanitaire (Editions A. Pedone 2015).Google Scholar
Moir, Lindsay, ‘Towards the unification of international humanitarian law?’, in Burchill, Richard, White, Niger, Morris, Justin (eds.), International Conflict and Security Law Essays in Memory of Hilaire McCoubrey (Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Moore, John (ed.), Law and Civil War in the Modern World (The Johns Hopkins University Press 1974).Google Scholar
Mose, Gregory, ‘The destruction of churches and mosques in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Seeking a rights-based approach to the protection of religious cultural property’ (1996–7) 3 BuffJIL 180.Google Scholar
Müller, Anna, ‘Legal issues arising from the armed conflict in Afghanistan’ (2004) 4 NSAI L 239.Google Scholar
Müller, Iris, ‘Non-international armed conflict under article 1 (1) AP II and 8 (2) (f) ICC Statute’ (2010) 40 Collegium 34.Google Scholar
Murphy, John, ‘Some legal (and a few ethical) dimensions of the collateral damage resulting from NATO’s Kosovo campaign’ (2001) 31 IsrYHR 51.Google Scholar
Murray, Daragh, ‘How international humanitarian law treaties bind non-state armed groups’ (2015) 20 JC&SL 101.Google Scholar
Nahlik, Stanisław, ‘Odpowiedzialność państwa w dziedzinie międzynarodowej ochrony dóbr kulturalnych’, in Sonnenfeld, Renata (ed.), Odpowiedzialność państwa w prawie międzynarodowym (PISM 1980).Google Scholar
Neff, Stephen, War and the Law of Nations: A General History (Cambridge University Press 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niebergall-Lackner, Heike, Status and Treatment of Deserters in International Armed Conflicts (Brill 2016).Google Scholar
Novogrodsky, Noah, ‘Is ISIS a State? The Status of Statehood in the Age of Terror’ (2018), 36 BerkJlL 36.Google Scholar
Odello, Marco, Beruto, Gian Luca (eds.), Non-state Actors and International Humanitarian Law. Organized Armed Groups: A Challenge for the 21st Century. 32nd Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law Sanremo, 11–13 September 2009 (FrancoAngeli 2010).Google Scholar
Omar, Abdulaziz, ‘Understanding and preventing attacks on health facilities during armed conflict in Syria’ (2020) 13 Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 191.Google Scholar
Osinga, Frans, Mark, Roorda, ‘From Douhet to drones, air warfare and the evolution of targeting’, in Ducheine, Paul, Schmitt, Michael, Osinga, Frans (ed.), Targeting: The Challenges of Modern Warfare (Springer 2016).Google Scholar
Pacholska, Małgorzata, ‘(Il)legality of killing peacekeepers: The crime of attacking peacekeepers in the jurisprudence of international criminal tribunals’ (2015) 13:1 JICJ 43.Google Scholar
Parks, Hays, ‘Part IX of the ICRC “Direct Participation in Hostilities” Study: No mandate, no expertise, and legally incorrect’ (2010) 42 NYU JILP 769.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas, Vashakmadze, Mindia, ‘Asymmetrical war and the notion of armed conflict – a tentative conceptualization’ (2009) 91:873 IRRC 95.Google Scholar
Peal, Robert, ‘Combatant status review tribunals and the unique nature of the war on terror’ (2005) 58:5 Vanderbilt Law Rev. 1629.Google Scholar
Pejić, Jelena, ‘Status of armed conflicts’, in Wilmshurst, Elisabeth, Breau, Susan (ed.), Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Pejić, Jelena, ‘The protective scope of common article 3: More than meets the eye’ (2011) 93:881 IRRC 189.Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean (ed.), Commentary on the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field (ICRC 1952).Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean (ed.), Commentary. Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (ICRC 1958).Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean (ed.), Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (ICRC 1960).Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean, Humanitarian Law and the Protection of War Victims (A. W. Sijthoff, Henry Dunant Institute 1975).Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean, Development and Principles of International Humanitarian Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1985).Google Scholar
Plant, Glen, ‘Environmental damage and the laws of war: Points addressed to military lawyers’, in Fox, Hazel, Meyer, Michael (eds.), Effecting Compliance (BII&CL 1993).Google Scholar
Pocar, Fausto, ‘To what extent is Protocol I customary international law?’ (2002) 78 ILS 337.Google Scholar
Pratzner, Philip, ‘The current targeting process’, in Ducheine, Paul, Schmitt, Michael, Osinga, Frans (eds.), Targeting: The Challenges of Modern Warfare (Springer 2016).Google Scholar
Price, Bryan, ‘Evaluating the effectiveness of leadership decapitation tactics against terrorist groups’, in Ducheine, Paul, Schmitt, Michael, Osinga, Frans (eds.), Targeting: The Challenges of Modern Warfare (Springer 2016).Google Scholar
Rawcliffe, John, ‘Child soldiers: Legal obligations and US implementation’ (2007) AL 1.Google Scholar
Redalié, Lorenzo, La conduite des hostilités dans les conflits armés asymétriques: un défi au droit humanitaire (Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence 2013).Google Scholar
Reeves, Shane, Wallace, David, ‘The combatant status of the “little green men” and other participants in the Ukraine conflict’ (2015) 91 ILS 361.Google Scholar
Reinhold, Herman, ‘Target lists: A 1923 idea with applications for the future’ (2002–3) 10 TJCIL 1.Google Scholar
Reisman, Michael, ‘Some reflections on international law and assassination under the Schmitt formula’ (1992) 17:2 Yale J. Int. Law687.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Jefferson, ‘Collateral damage on the 21st century battlefield: Enemy exploitation of the law of armed conflict, and the struggle for a moral high ground’ (2005) 56 AFLR 1.Google Scholar
Richter, Dagmar, ‘Humanitarian law and human rights: Intersecting circles or separate spheres’, in Giegerich, Thomas (ed.), A Wiser Century? Judicial Dispute Settlement, Disarmament and the Laws of War 100 Years after the Second Hague Peace Conference (Duncker & Humblot 2009).Google Scholar
Roach, Ashley, ‘Missiles on target: The law of targeting and the tanker war’ (1988) 82 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 154.Google Scholar
Roberts, Adam, ‘Lives and statistics: Are 90% of war victims civilians?’ (2010) 52:3 Survival 115.Google Scholar
Robertson, Horace, ‘The status of civil aircraft in armed conflict’ (1998) 27 IsrYHR 113.Google Scholar
Rodenhäuser, Tilman, ‘Human rights obligations of non-state armed groups in other situations of violence: The Syria example’ (2012) 3 IHLS 263.Google Scholar
Rogers, Anthony, ‘International humanitarian law and today’s armed conflicts’ (2001) 21 Collegium 20.Google Scholar
Rogers, Anthony, ‘What is a legitimate military target?’, in Burchill, Richard, White, Nigel, Morris, Justin (ed.), International Conflict and Security Law Essays in Memory of Hilaire McCoubrey (Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Rogers, Anthony, ‘Combatant status’, in Wilmshurst, Elisabet, Breau, Susan (eds.), Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Rogers, Anthony, Law on the Battlefield, Third edition (Manchester University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Rosen, Richard, ‘Targeting enemy forces in the war on terror: Preserving civilian immunity’ (2009) 42:3 VandJTL 683.Google Scholar
Ryngaert, Cedric, Van de Meulebroucke, Anneleen, ‘Enhancing and enforcing compliance with international humanitarian law by non-state armed groups: An inquiry into some mechanisms’ (2011) 16:3 JC&SL 443.Google Scholar
Sandoz, Yves, ‘La notion d’objectif militaire et les cibles duales’, in Chetail, Vincent (ed.), Permanence et mutation du droit des conflits armés (Bruylant 2013).Google Scholar
Sandoz, Yves, Swinarski, Christophe, Zimmermann, Bruno (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (ICRC, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1987).Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘La “guerre contre le terrorisme,” le droit international humanitaire et le statut de prisonnier de guerre’ (2001) 39 CanYIL 211.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Involving organized armed groups in the development of the law’, in Odello, Marco, Beruto, Gian Luca (eds.), Non-state Actors and International Humanitarian Law. Organized Armed Groups: A Challenge for the 21st Century. 32nd Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law Sanremo, 11–13 September 2009 (FrancoAngeli 2010a).Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Taking armed groups seriously: Ways to improve their compliance with international humanitarian law’ (2010b) 1 JIHLS 5.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Introducing a sliding-scale of obligations to address the fundamental inequality between armed groups and states?’ (2011a) 93:882 IRRC 426.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘The role of human rights and international humanitarian law in new types of armed conflict’, in Ben-Naftali, Orna (ed.), International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law (Oxford University Press 2011b).Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Autonomous weapons and international humanitarian law: Advantages, open technical questions and legal issues to be clarified’ (2014) 90 ILS 308.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, International Humanitarian Law: Rules, Controversies, and Solutions to Problems Arising in Warfare (Elgar 2019).Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, Bouvier, Antoine, Quintin, Anne, How Does Law Protect in War? Cases, Documents and Teaching Materials on Contemporary Practice in International Humanitarian Law, vol. I: Outline of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd ed. (ICRC 2011).Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, Olson, Laura, ‘The relationship between international humanitarian and human rights law: Where it matters: admissible killing and internment of fighters in non-international armed conflicts’ (2008) 90:871 IRRC 599.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, Quintin, Anne, ‘Active and passive precautions in air and missile warfare’ (2014) 44 IsrYHR 69.Google Scholar
Schaack, Beth van, ‘The killing of Osama Bin Laden and Anwar Al-Aulaqi: Uncharted legal territory’ (2011) 14 YIHL 255.Google Scholar
Schabas, William, ‘Was genocide committed in Bosnia and Herzegovina? First Judgments of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’ (2001) 25:1 FordILJ 23.Google Scholar
Schabas, William, ‘Lex specialis? Belt and suspenders? The parallel operation of human rights law and the law of armed conflict, and the conundrum of ius ad bellum’ (2007), 40 IsrLR 592.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘Future war and the principle of discrimination’ (1998) 28 IsrYHR 51.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘“Direct participation in hostilities” and 21st century armed conflict’, in Fischer, Horst, Froissart, Ulrike, Heinegg, Wolff, Raap, Christian (ed.), Krisensicherung und Humanitärer Schutz – Crisis Management and Humanitarian Protection (Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag 2004a)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘Targeting and humanitarian law: Current issues’ (2004b) 34 IsrYHR 59.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘Humanitarian law and direct participation in hostilities by private contractors or civilian employees’ (2004–5) 5 Chi. J. Int’l L 511.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘Fault lines in the law of attack’, in Breau, Susan, Jachec-Neale, Agnieszka (eds.), Testing the Boundaries of International Humanitarian Law (BII&CL 2006a)Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘War, technology and the law of armed conflict’, in Helm, Anthony (ed.), The Law of War in the 21st Century: Weaponry and the Use of Force (Naval War College 2006b).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘The law of targeting’, in Wilmshurst, Elisabeth, Breau, Susan (eds.), Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘The principle of distinction and weapon systems on the contemporary battlefield: A US perspective on challenges for a military commander’ (2008) 37 Collegium 53.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘Targeting and international humanitarian law in Afghanistan’ (2009) 85 ISSUSNWC 307.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘Deconstructing direct participation in hostilities: The constitutive elements’ (2010a) 42 IL&Pol 697.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘Military necessity and humanity in international humanitarian law: Preserving the delicate balance’ (2010b) 50:4 VirJIL 796.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘The Interpretive guidance on the notion of direct participation in hostilities: A critical analysis’ (2010c) 1 HNSJ 5.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘Investigating violations of international law in armed conflict’ (2011) 2 HNSJ 31.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘The status of opposition fighters in a non-international armed conflict’ (2012) 42 IsrYHR 27.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael (ed.), Talinn Manual on International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare (Cambridge University Press 2013a).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘Wound, capture, or kill: A reply to Ryan Goodman’s “The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants”’ (2013b) 24:3 EJIL 855.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘Rewired warfare: Rethinking the law of cyber attack’ (2014) 96:893 IRRC 189.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, Widmar, Eric, ‘“On target”: Precision and balance in the contemporary law of targeting’ (2014) 7 JNSLP 379.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, Widmar, Eric, ‘The law of targeting’, in Ducheine, Paul, Schmitt, Michael, Osinga, Frans (eds.), Targeting: The Challenges of Modern Warfare (Springer 2016).Google Scholar
Schöberl, Katja, ‘Boundaries of the battlefield: The geographical scope of the laws of war’, in Barela, Steven (ed.), Legitimacy and Drones: Investigating the Legality, Morality and Efficacy of UCAVs (Ashgate 2015).Google Scholar
Schwendimann, Felix, ‘The legal framework of humanitarian access in armed conflict’ (2011) 93:884 IRRC 993.Google Scholar
Shamash, Hamutal, ‘How much is too much? An examination of the principle of ius in bello proportionality’ (2005–6) 2 IDFLR 103.Google Scholar
Sharkey, Noel, ‘Automating warfare: Lessons learned from the drones’ (2011) 21 JLIS 140.Google Scholar
Sharp, Walter, ‘Operation Allied Force: Reviewing the lawfulness of NATO’s use of military force to defend Kosovo’ (1999) 23:1 Md J Int Law Trade 295.Google Scholar
Shaw, Martin, The New Western Way of War: Risk-Transfer War and its Crisis in Iraq (Polity Press 2008).Google Scholar
Sheppard, Bede, Kizuka, Kennji, ‘Taking armed conflict out of the classroom: International and domestic legal protections for students when combatants use schools’ (2011) 2 IHLS 281.Google Scholar
Short, Michael, ‘Operation Allied Force from the perspective of the NATO Air Commander’ (2002) 78 ILS 19.Google Scholar
Shotwell, C. B., ‘Economy and humanity in the use of force: A look at the aerial rules of engagement in the 1991 Gulf War’ (1993) 4 USAFAJLS 15.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry, ‘Understanding international humanitarian law in practice: A review of some specific cases’ (2002) 25 Collegium 59.Google Scholar
Smith, Rupert, The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World (Alfred A. Knopf 2007).Google Scholar
Solis, Gary, ‘Law of war issues in ground hostilities in Afghanistan’ (2009) 85 ISSUSNWC 219.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Dawn, ‘Talking to the enemy: State legitimacy concerns with engaging non-state armed groups’ (2009) 45 TexILJ 297.Google Scholar
Stephens, Dale, ‘Coalition warfare: Challenges and opportunities’, in Helm, Anthony (ed.), The Law of War in the 21st Century: Weaponry and the Use of Force (Naval War College 2006).Google Scholar
Stephens, Dale, Lewis, Michael, ‘The law of armed conflict – a contemporary critique’ (2005) 6 MelbJIL 55.Google Scholar
Szpak, Agnieszka, Bezpośredni udział w działaniach zbrojnych w świetle międzynarodowego prawa humanitarnego (TNOiK 2013).Google Scholar
Szpak, Agnieszka, ‘Evolution of the International Humanitarian Law Provisions on Sieges’ (2019) 22 YIHL 3.Google Scholar
Tabassum, Sadia, ‘Combatants, not bandits: The status of rebels in Islamic law’ (2011) 93:881 IRRC 121.Google Scholar
Tamanini, Marica, Violent Incidents Affecting the Delivery of Health Care. Health Care in Danger January 2012 to December 2014 (ICRC 2015).Google Scholar
Taubenfeld, Howard, ‘The Applicability of the Laws of War in Civil War’, in Moore, John (ed.), Law and Civil War in the Modern World (The Johns Hopkins University Press 1974).Google Scholar
Telman, Jeremy, ‘The Geneva Conventions in 21st century warfare: How the conventions should treat civilians’ direct participation in hostilities. Introduction: Targeting in an asymmetrical world’ (2012), 46 ValpULR 697.Google Scholar
Terry, James, ‘Operation Desert Storm: Stark contrasts in compliance with the rule of law’ (1993) 41 Naval L. Rev. 83.Google Scholar
Ticehurst, Rupert, ‘The Martens Clause and the laws of armed conflict’ (1997) 317 IRRC 125.Google Scholar
Tougas, Marie-Louise, Droit international sociétés militaire privies et conflit armé. Entre incertitudes et responsabilités (Bruylant 2012).Google Scholar
Trooboff, Peter (ed.), Law and Responsibility in Warfare: The Vietnam Experience (The University of North Carolina Press 1975).Google Scholar
Turning a Blind Eye: Impunity for Laws-of-War Violations during the Gaza War (Human Rights Watch 2010).Google Scholar
Urdal, Henrik, Mythbusting: Are Women the Main Victims of Armed Conflict? PRIO Gender, Peace and Security Update (2010).Google Scholar
Vasileski, Voslav, International Law in Armed Conflicts with Special View to the Contemporary Armed Conflicts in Balkans (Military Academy ‘General Mihailo Apostolski’ 2003).Google Scholar
Vité, Sylvain, ‘Typology of armed conflicts in international humanitarian law: Legal concepts and actual situations’ (2009) 91:873 IRRC 69.Google Scholar
Walker, Jeffrey, ‘Strategic targeting and international law: The ambiguity of law meets the reality of a single-superpower world’ (2006) 80 ILSSUSNWC 121.Google Scholar
Ward, Christopher, ‘Distinction: The application of the additional protocols in the theatre of war’ (2006) 2 APYIHL 36.Google Scholar
Warner, Elisabeth, ‘Characteristics and motivations of organized armed group’, in Odello, Marco, Beruto, Gian Luca (ed.), Non-state Actors and International Humanitarian Law. Organized Armed Groups: A Challenge for the 21st Century. 32nd Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law Sanremo, 11–13 September 2009 (FrancoAngeli 2010).Google Scholar
Watkin, Kenneth, ‘Opportunity lost: Organized armed groups and the ICRC “Direct Participation in Hostilities” interpretive guidance’ (2010) 42 IL&Pol 641.Google Scholar
Watts, Sean, ‘Under Siege: International Humanitarian Law and Security Council Practice concerning Urban Siege Operations’, Research and Policy Paper, Counterterrorism and Humanitarian Engagement Project (2014).Google Scholar
White, Nigel, ‘Security Council mandates and the use of lethal force by peacekeepers: What place for the laws of war?’, in Harvey, Caroline, Summers, James, White, Nigel (ed.), Contemporary Challenges to the Laws of War Essays in Honour of Professor Peter Rowe (Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, Elisabeth, Breau, Susan (ed.), Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Wolfke, Karol, Custom in Present International Law (Prace Wrocławskiego Towarzystwa Naukowego, Seria A, Nr 101, 1964).Google Scholar
Wolfrum, Rüdiger, ‘The protection of the environment in armed conflict’ (2015) 45 IsrYHR 67.Google Scholar