Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T03:39:16.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2020

Stian Øby Johansen
Stian Øby Johansen
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Human Rights Accountability Mechanisms of International Organizations , pp. 302 - 319
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Abels, D, Prisoners of the International Community: The Legal Position of Persons Detained at International Criminal Tribunals (Springer 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlborn, C, “To Share or Not to Share? The Allocation of Responsibility between International Organizations and Their Member States,” Die Friedens-Warte, 88 (2013), 45Google Scholar
Ahlborn, C, “The Use of Analogies in Drafting the Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations: An Appraisal of the ‘Copy-Paste Approach,’” International Organizations Law Review, 9 (2012), 53Google Scholar
Akande, D, “International Organizations” in Evans, Malcolm (ed.), International Law (5th ed., OUP 2018)Google Scholar
Allan, TRS, “Procedural Fairness and the Duty of Respect,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies , 18 (1998), 497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altwicker, T and Wieczorek, N, “Bridging the Security Gap through EU Rule of Law Missions? Rule of Law Administration by EULEX,” Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 21 (2016), 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, JE, International Organizations as Law-Makers (OUP 2005)Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, CF, “An Assessment of the ILC’s Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations” in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013)Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, CF, Jurisdiction of International Tribunals (Kluwer Law International 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amerasinghe, CF, Jurisdiction of Specific International Tribunals (Brill Academic Publishers 2009)Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, CF, The Law of the International Civil Service: As Applied by International Administrative Tribunals, vol. 1 (2nd ed., Clarendon Press 1994)Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, CF, Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations (2nd ed., CUP 2005)Google Scholar
Anand, P, “Procedural Fairness in Economic and Social Choice: Evidence from a Survey of Voters,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 22 (2001) 247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzilotti, D, “La responsabilité internationale des États à raison des dommages soufferts par des étrangers,” Revue générale de droit international public, 13 (1906), 5Google Scholar
Aust, A, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (3rd ed., CUP 2013)Google Scholar
Aust, HP, Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility (CUP 2011)Google Scholar
Bailey, KD, Typologies and Taxonomies (SAGE Publications 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, MN and Finnemore, M, Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Cornell University Press 2004)Google Scholar
Bassiouni, MC, “A Functional Approach to General Principles of International Law,” Michigan Journal of International Law, 11 (1989), 768Google Scholar
Bell, JS, “Comparative Administrative Law” in Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (2nd ed., OUP 2019)Google Scholar
Benzing, M, “International Organizations or Institutions, Secondary Law” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online ed) (OUP 2007) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/mpil>Google Scholar
Bernhardt, R, “International Organizations or Institutions, Internal Law and Rules” in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 2 (Elsevier 1995)Google Scholar
Bernt, JF, “Et hermeneutisk perspektiv på rettsvitenskap og juridisk metode” in Høgberg, Alf Petter and Sunde, Jørn Øyrehagen (eds.), Juridisk metode og tenkemåte (Universitetsforlaget 2019)Google Scholar
Bernt, JF and Doublet, DR, Vitenskapsfilosofi for jurister: en innføring (Fagbokforlaget 1998)Google Scholar
Bitti, G, “Article 21 and the Hierarchy of Sources of Law before the ICC” in Stahn, Carsten (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court (OUP 2015)Google Scholar
Blokker, NM, “Preparing Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations: Does the International Law Commission Take International Organizations Seriously?” in Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Åsa (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Edward Elgar 2011)Google Scholar
Blokker, NM and Schrijver, N (eds.), “Special Issue on the Immunities of International Organizations,” International Organizations Law Review, 10 (2014), 255Google Scholar
Bodansky, D, “The Concept of Legitimacy in International Law” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Röben, Volker (eds.), Legitimacy in International Law (Springer 2008)Google Scholar
Bodansky, D, “Legitimacy in International Law and International Relations” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L, and Pollack, Mark A (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (CUP 2012)Google Scholar
Bogdandy, A von and Platise, MS, “ARIO and Human Rights Protection: Leaving the Individual in the Cold,” International Organizations Law Review, 9 (2012), 67Google Scholar
Boon, KE, “The Role of Lex Specialis in the Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations” in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013)Google Scholar
Boon, KE, “The United Nations as Good Samaritan: Immunity and Responsibility,” Chicago Journal of International Law, 16 (2016), 341Google Scholar
Bordin, FL, The Analogy between States and International Organizations (CUP 2018)Google Scholar
Bousta, R, “The Ombudsman: Proposal for a Definition,” The International Ombudsman Yearbook, 9 (2005), 36Google Scholar
Boutin, B, “Attribution of Conduct in International Military Operations: A Causal Analysis of Effective Control,” Melbourne Journal of International Law, 18 (2017), 154Google Scholar
Bovens, M, “Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework,” European Law Journal, 13 (2007), 447Google Scholar
Brems, E and Lavrysen, L, “Procedural Justice in Human Rights Adjudication: The European Court of Human Rights,” Human Rights Quarterly, 35 (2013),176Google Scholar
Briggs, A, Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments (6th ed., Routledge 2015)Google Scholar
Brinkmann, S and Kvale, S, InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (3rd ed., SAGE Publications 2015)Google Scholar
Broom, H, A Selection of Legal Maxims: Classified and Illustrated (10th ed., Sweet & Maxwell 1939)Google Scholar
Brown, C, “Inherent Powers in International Adjudication” in Romano, Cesare PR, Alter, Karen J, and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Brown, LN, and Kennedy, T, The Court of Justice of the European Communities (5th ed., Sweet & Maxwell 2000)Google Scholar
Brownlie, I, System of the Law of Nations: State Responsibility (Part 1) (Clarendon Press 1983)Google Scholar
Brunnée, J, “International Legal Accountability through the Lens of the Law of State Responsibility,” Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 36 (2005), 21Google Scholar
Busuioc, M, European Agencies: Law and Practices of Accountability (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Butler, G, “H v Council: Another Court Breakthrough in the Common Foreign and Security Policy” (EU Law Analysis, July 22, 2016) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/07/h-v-council-another-court-breakthrough.html> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Butler, G and Ratcovich, M, “Operation Sophia in Uncharted Waters: European and International Law Challenges for the EU Naval Mission in the Mediterranean Sea,” Nordic Journal of International Law, 85 (2016), 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahin, G, La coutume internationale et les organisations internationales: l’incidence de la dimension institutionnelle sur le processus coutumier (A Pédone 2001)Google Scholar
Carl, S, “Toward a Definition and Taxonomy of Public Sector Ombudsmen,” Canadian Public Administration, 55 (2012), 203Google Scholar
Cassese, A, International Law (2nd ed., OUP 2005)Google Scholar
Cathcart, B, “Command and Control in Military Operations” in Gill, Terry D and Fleck, Dieter (eds.), The Handbook of the International Law of Military Operations (OUP 2010)Google Scholar
LB de, Chazournes, “Functionalism! Functionalism! Do I Look Like Functionalism?” European Journal of International Law, 26 (2015), 951Google Scholar
Cheng, B, General Principles of Law: As Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Stevens & Sons Ltd 1953)Google Scholar
Chinkin, C, Third Parties in International Law (OUP 1993)Google Scholar
Clapham, A, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (OUP 2006)Google Scholar
Condorelli, L and Kress, C, “The Rules of Attribution: General Considerations” in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (OUP 2010)Google Scholar
Cooley, A, “The League of Authoritarian Gentlemen” (Foreign Policy, January 30, 2013) <https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/01/30/the-league-of-authoritarian-gentlemen/> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Costello, C and Moreno-Lax, V, “The Extraterritorial Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: From Territoriality to Facticity, the Effectiveness Model” in Peers, Steve, Hervey, Tamara, Kenner, Jeff, and Ward, Angela (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Hart Publishing 2014)Google Scholar
Craig, P, The Lisbon Treaty: Law, Politics, and Treaty Reform (OUP 2010)Google Scholar
Crawford, J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (9th ed., OUP 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J, State Responsibility: The General Part (CUP 2013)Google Scholar
Crawshaw, R, Cullen, S, and Williamson, T, Human Rights and Policing (2nd ed., Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2007)Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J and Brölmann, C, “Challenging International Criminal Tribunals Before Domestic Courts” in Reinisch, August (ed.), Challenging Acts of International Organizations Before National Courts (OUP 2010)Google Scholar
Davies, B, “Segi and the Future of Judicial Rights Protection in the Third Pillar of the EU,” European Public Law, 14 (2008), 311Google Scholar
De Brabandere, E, “Immunity of International Organizations in Post-Conflict International Administrations,” International Organizations Law Review, 7 (2010), 79Google Scholar
De Schutter, O, “Human Rights and the Rise of International Organisations: The Logic of Sliding Scales in the Law of International Responsibility” in Wouters, Jan, Brems, Eva, Smis, Stefan, and Schmitt, Pierre (eds.), Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organisations (Intersentia 2010)Google Scholar
Dijkstra, H, International Organizations and Military Affairs (Routledge 2016)Google Scholar
Dobison, I and Johns, F, “Qualitative Legal Research” in Chui, Wing Hong and McConville, Michael (eds.), Research Methods for Law (Edinburgh University Press 2007)Google Scholar
Dragos, DC and Marrani, D, “Administrative Appeals in Comparative European Administrative Law: What Effectiveness?” in Dragos, Dacian C and Neamtu, Bogdana (eds.), Alternative Dispute Resolution in European Administrative Law (Springer 2014)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R, Law’s Empire (Belknap Press 1986)Google Scholar
Eagleton, C, “International Organization and the Law of Responsibility,” Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 76 (1950)Google Scholar
Eckes, C, “Common Foreign and Security Policy: The Consequences of the Court’s Extended Jurisdiction,” European Law Journal, 22 (2016) 492Google Scholar
Eckes, C, “EU Accession to the ECHR: Between Autonomy and Adaptation,” Modern Law Review, 76 (2013), 254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eeckhout, P, EU External Relations Law (2nd ed., OUP 2011)Google Scholar
Eeckhout, P, “Opinion 2/13 on EU Accession to the ECHR and Judicial Dialogue: Autonomy or Autarky,” Fordham International Law Journal, 38 (2015) 955Google Scholar
Fabbricotti, A, “Ombudsperson” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online ed) (OUP 2009) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/mpil>Google Scholar
Faix, M, “Victimsʹ Right to Reparation under International Human Rights Law: Also against International Organizations?” Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law 2015 (Czech Society of International Law 2015)Google Scholar
Farmer, A, “Refugee Responses, State-like Behavior, and Accountability for Human Rights Violations: A Case Study of Sexual Violence in Guinea’s Refugee Camps,” Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal, 9 (2006), 44Google Scholar
Fauchald, OK, “Hardening the Legal Softness of the World Bank through an Inspection Panel,” Scandinavian Studies in Law, 58 (2013), 101Google Scholar
Ferstman, C, International Organizations and the Fight for Accountability: The Remedies and Reparations Gap (OUP 2017)Google Scholar
Finnis, J, Natural Law and Natural Rights (2nd ed., OUP 2011)Google Scholar
Flick, U, Designing Qualitative Research (SAGE Publications 2007)Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B, “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research,” Qualitative Inquiry, 12 (2006) 219Google Scholar
Fox, H, and Webb, P, The Law of State Immunity (3rd ed., OUP 2015)Google Scholar
Fuller, LL, “Adjudication and the Rule of Law” Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting, 54 (1960), 1Google Scholar
Fuller, LL, “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication,” Harvard Law Review, 92 (1978), 353Google Scholar
Fuller, LL, The Morality of Law (revised edition, Yale University Press 1969)Google Scholar
Gaillard, E and Pingel-Lenuzza, I, “International Organisations and Immunity from Jurisdiction: To Restrict or to Bypass,” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 51 (2002), 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaja, G, “General Principles of Law” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online ed) (OUP 2007) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/mpil>Google Scholar
Gallie, WB, “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56 (1955), 167Google Scholar
Gasbarri, L, “The Dual Legality of the Rules of International Organizations,” International Organizations Law Review, 14 (2017), 87Google Scholar
Gerring, J, “The Case Study: What It Is and What It Does” in Goodin, Robert E (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Science (OUP 2011)Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, GS and McAdam, J, The Refugee in International Law (3rd ed., OUP 2007)Google Scholar
Gradoni, L, Lewis, D, Megret, F, Nouwen, S, Ohlin, JD, Reisinger-Coracini, A, and Zappala, S, “General Framework of International Criminal Procedure” in Sluiter, Göran, Friman, Håkan, Linton, Sozannah, Vassiliev, Sergey, and Zappalà, Salvatore (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Grant, RW and Keohane, RO, “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics,” American Political Science Review, 99 (2005), 29Google Scholar
Graver, HP, “Vanlig juridisk metode? Om rettsdogmatikken som juridisk sjanger,” Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap [2008], 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R, “New Public Management and the Politics of Accountability” in Goldfinch, Shaun and Wallis, Joe L (eds.), International Handbook of Public Management Reform (Edward Elgar 2009)Google Scholar
Grimalda, G, Kar, A, and Proto, E, “Procedural Fairness in Lotteries Assigning Initial Roles in a Dynamic Setting” Experimental Economics, 19 (2016), 819Google Scholar
Guzman, A, “International Organizations and the Frankenstein Problem” European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 999Google Scholar
Hafner, G, “Accountability of International Organizations – A Critical View” in Macdonald, Ronald St John and Johnston, Douglas M (eds.), Towards World Constitutionalism (Brill 2005)Google Scholar
Halberstam, D, “‘It’s the Autonomy, Stupid!’ A Modest Defense of Opinion 2/13 on EU Accession to the ECHR, and the Way Forward,” German Law Journal, 16 (2015), 105Google Scholar
Hannum, H, “The Status of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in National and International Law,” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 25 (1995), 287Google Scholar
Harlow, C, Accountability in the European Union (OUP 2002)Google Scholar
Hart, HLA, The Concept of Law (3rd ed., OUP 2012)Google Scholar
Häußler, U, “Human Rights Accountability of International Organizations in the Lead of International Peace Missions” in Wouters, Jan, Brems, Eva, Smis, Stefan, and Schmitt, Pierre (eds.), Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organisations (Intersentia 2010)Google Scholar
Heede, K, European Ombudsman: Redress and Control at Union Level (Kluwer 2000)Google Scholar
Heliskoski, J, “Responsibility and Liability for CSDP Operations” in Blockmans, Steven and Koutrakos, Panos (eds.), Research Handbook on the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (Edward Elgar 2018)Google Scholar
Higgins, R, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (OUP 1994)Google Scholar
Hillion, C, “Decentralised Integration? Fundamental Rights Protection in the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy,” European Papers, 1 (2016), 55Google Scholar
Hillion, C, “A Powerless Court? The European Court of Justice and the Common Foreign and Security Policy” in Cremona, Marise and Thies, Anne (eds.), The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law: Constitutional Challenges (Hart 2014)Google Scholar
Hinarejos, A, “Judicial Control of CFSP in the Constitution: A Cherry Worth Picking?” Yearbook of European Law, 25 (2006), 363Google Scholar
Hirsch, M, The Responsibility of International Organizations Toward Third Parties: Some Basic Principles (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1995)Google Scholar
Hoffmann, F and Mégret, F, “Fostering Human Rights Accountability: An Ombudsperson for the United Nations?” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 11 (2005), 43Google Scholar
Holborn, LW, Refugees, a Problem of Our Time: The Work of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 1951–1972, vol. 1 (Scarecrow Press 1975)Google Scholar
Hollander-Blumoff, R and Tyler, TR, “Procedural Justice and the Rule of Law: Fostering Legitimacy in Alternative Dispute Resolution,” Journal of Dispute Resolution, [2011], 1Google Scholar
Hovell, D, “Due Process in the United Nations,” The American Journal of International Law, 110 (2016), 1Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T, and Duncan, N, “Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research,” Deakin Law Review, 17 (2012), 83Google Scholar
Hyndman, JM, “Geographies of Displacement: Gender, Culture and Power in UNHCR Refugee Camps, Kenya” (PhD thesis, University of British Columbia 1996)Google Scholar
Hyndman, JM, “Refugee Self-Management and the Question of Governance,” Refuge, 16 (1997), 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Law Association, “Berlin Conference: Accountability of International Organizations,” International Organizations Law Review, 1 (2004), 221Google Scholar
Istrefi, R, “The Case of the United Nations Interim Administration in Kosovo (UNMIK)” in Wouters, Jan, Brems, Eva, Smis, Stefan, and Schmitt, Pierre (eds.), Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organisations (Intersentia 2010)Google Scholar
Jacobini, HB, An Introduction to Comparative Administrative Law (Oceana Publications 1991)Google Scholar
Janmyr, M, “Attributing Wrongful Conduct of Implementing Partners to UNHCR,” Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 5 (2014), 42Google Scholar
Janmyr, M, Protecting Civilians in Refugee Camps: Unable and Unwilling States, UNHCR and International Responsibility (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2014)Google Scholar
Johansen, SØ, “Accountability for Human Rights Violations by CSDP Missions: Available and Sufficient?” International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 66 (2017), 181Google Scholar
Johansen, SØ, “The European Union’s Accession to the ECHR: As Seen from Strasbourg,” University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper No 151 (2012) <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2142446> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Johansen, SØ, “H. v. Council et al. – A Minor Expansion of the CJEU’s Jurisdiction Over the CFSP,” European Papers 1297, 1 (2016)Google Scholar
Johansen, SØ, “The Reinterpretation of TFEU Article 344 in Opinion 2/13 and Its Potential Consequences,” German Law Journal, 16 (2015), 169Google Scholar
Johansen, SØ, “Suing the European Union in the UK: Tomanović et. al. v. the European Union et. Al.,” European Papers, 4 (2019), 345Google Scholar
Johnston, D, A Brief History of Justice (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2011)Google Scholar
Kamiya, M, “A Study of Formal Relationships between Civil Society and Multilateral Bodies: Accreditation and Other Consultative Modalities” (Building Bridges III: Engaging Civil Society from Muslim States and Communities with the Multilateral Sphere, Dhaka, October 27, 2007)Google Scholar
Kazemi, A, Törnblom, K, and Mikula, G, “Justice: Social Psychological Perspectives” in Wright, James D (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Elsevier 2015) 949Google Scholar
Kelsen, H, Pure Theory of Law (Knight tr, Max, 2nd ed., Lawbook Exchange 1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keren, G and Teigen, KH, “Decisions by Coin Toss: Inappropriate but Fair,” Judgment and Decision Making, 5 (2010), 19Google Scholar
Kinchin, N, “Accountability in the Global Space: Plurality, Complexity and UNHCR” (PhD thesis, University of New South Wales 2014)Google Scholar
Kinchin, N, “The Implied Human Rights Obligations of UNHCR,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 28 (2016), 251Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B, Krisch, N, and Stewart, RB, “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law,” Law and Contemporary Problems, 68 (2004), 15Google Scholar
Kjeldgaard-Pedersen, A, The International Legal Personality of the Individual (OUP 2018)Google Scholar
Kjølbro, JF, Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonvention: For praktikere (4th ed., DJØF Forlag 2017)Google Scholar
Kjos, HE, Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration: The Interplay Between National and International Law (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, “Book Review: ‘Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie’, Edited by Maurizio Ragazzi,” (2015) International Organizations Law Review, 12, 279Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, “EJIL Foreword: The Transformation of International Organizations Law,” European Journal of International Law, 26 (2015), 9Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, “The Emergence of Functionalism in International Institutional Law: Colonial Inspirations,” European Journal of International Law, 25 (2014), 645Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, An Introduction to International Organizations Law (3rd ed., CUP 2015)Google Scholar
Klein, P, “International Organizations or Institutions, Internal Law and Rules” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online ed) (OUP 2019) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/mpil>Google Scholar
Klein, P, “Responsibility” in Cogan, Jacob Katz, Hurd, Ian, and Johnstone, Ian (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations (OUP 2016)Google Scholar
Korkea-aho, E and Leino, P, “Interviewing Lawyers: A Critical Self-Reflection on Expert Interviews as a Method of EU Legal Research,” European Journal of Legal Studies, [2019], 17Google Scholar
Kosta, V, Skoutaris, N, and Tzevelekos, VP (eds.), The EU Accession to the ECHR (Hart Publishing 2014)Google Scholar
Koutrakos, P, The EU Common Security and Defense Policy (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Koutrakos, P, “Judicial Review in the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy,” International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 67 (2018), 1Google Scholar
Kuijper, PJ, Wouters, J, Hoffmeister, F, De Baere, G, and Rmopoulos, T, The Law of EU External Relations: Cases, Materials, and Commentary on the EU as an International Legal Actor (2nd ed., OUP 2015)Google Scholar
Lanovoy, V, Complicity and Its Limits in the Law of International Responsibility (Hart 2016)Google Scholar
Law, J and Martin, EA, “Ubi Jus Ibi Remedium,” A Dictionary of Law (7th ed. online, OUP 2014) <www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199551248.001.0001/acref-9780199551248-e-4078> accessed October 10, 2019Google Scholar
Lazowski, A and Wessel, RA, “When Caveats Turn into Locks: Opinion 2/13 on Accession of the European Union to the ECHR,” German Law Journal, 16 (2015), 179Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K, Maselis, I, and Gutman, K, EU Procedural Law (OUP 2015)Google Scholar
Lind, EA, Kanfer, R, and Earley, PC, “Voice, Control, and Procedural Justice: Instrumental and Noninstrumental Concerns in Fairness Judgments,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 (1990), 952Google Scholar
Lind, EA and Tyler, TR, The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (Plenum Press 1988)Google Scholar
Lock, T, “End of an Epic? The Draft Agreement on the EU’s Accession to the ECHR,” Yearbook of European Law, 31 (2012), 162Google Scholar
Loescher, G, The UNHCR and World Politics: A Perilous Path (OUP 2001)Google Scholar
Lowe, AV, International Law (OUP 2007)Google Scholar
Luban, D, “Justice and Law” in Wright, James D (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Elsevier 2015) 932Google Scholar
Lundahl, K, “The United Nations and the Remedy Gap: The Haiti Cholera Dispute,” Die Friedens-Warte, 88 (2013), 77Google Scholar
Mann, FA, “The Doctrine of Jurisdiction in International Law,” Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 111 (1964), 9Google Scholar
Margiev, VI, “On Legal Nature of Internal Law of International Organizations,” Soviet Yearbook of International Law 1980 (Publishing house “Nauka” 1981)Google Scholar
McCorquodale, R, “The Individual and the International Legal System” in Evans, Malcolm (ed.), International Law (5th ed., OUP 2018)Google Scholar
Meester, K de, Pitcher, K, Rastan, R, and Sluiter, G, “Investigation, Coercive Measures, Arrest, and Surrender” in Sluiter, Göran and others (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Mégret, F and Hoffmann, F, “The UN as a Human Rights Violator? Some Reflections on the United Nations Changing Human Rights Responsibilities,” Human Rights Quarterly, 25 (2003), 314Google Scholar
Meron, T, Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law (OUP 1991)Google Scholar
Messineo, F, “Attribution of Conduct” in Nollkaemper, André and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds.), Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law: An Appraisal of the State of the Art (CUP 2014)Google Scholar
Meuser, M and Nagel, U, “The Expert Interview and Changes in Knowledge Production” in Bogner, Alexander, Littig, Beate, and Menz, Wolfgang (eds.), Interviewing Experts (Palgrave Macmillan 2009)Google Scholar
Milanović, M, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy (OUP 2011)Google Scholar
Miller, D, “Justice” in Zalta, Edward N (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University 2017) <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/justice/> accessed October 10, 2019Google Scholar
Mills, A, “Rethinking Jurisdiction in International Law,” British Yearbook of International Law, 84 (2014), 187Google Scholar
Montejo, B, “The Notion of ‘Effective Control’ under the Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations” in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013)Google Scholar
Morgenstern, F, Legal Problems of International Organizations (CUP 1986)Google Scholar
Mulgan, R, “Accountability’: An Ever-Expanding Concept?” Public Administration, 78 (2000), 555Google Scholar
Mulgan, R, Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies (Palgrave Macmillan 2003)Google Scholar
Mungianu, R, Frontex and Non-Refoulement: The International Responsibility of the EU (CUP 2016)Google Scholar
Musila, GM, “The Right to an Effective Remedy under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights,” African Human Rights Law Journal, 6 (2006), 442Google Scholar
Naert, F, “The Application of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law in Drafting EU Missions’ Mandates and Rules of Engagement,” KU Leuven, Institute for International Law Working Paper No 151 (2011) <www.law.kuleuven.be/iir/nl/onderzoek/wp/wp151e.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Naert, F, “European Union Common Security and Defence Policy Operations” in Nollkaemper, André and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds.), The Practice of Shared Responsibility International Law (CUP 2017)Google Scholar
Naert, F, International Law Aspects of the EU’s Security and Defence Policy, with a Particular Focus on the Law of Armed Conflict and Human Rights (Intersentia 2010)Google Scholar
Naert, F, “The International Responsibility of the Union in the Context of Its CSDP Operations” in Evans, Malcolm D and Koutrakos, Panos (eds.), The International Responsibility of the European Union: European and International Perspectives (Hart 2013)Google Scholar
Nedeski, N, and Nollkaemper, A, “Responsibility of International Organizations ‘in Connection with Acts of States,’” (2012) International Organizations Law Review, 9, 33Google Scholar
Nerlich, V, “The Status Of ICTY And ICTR Precedent In Proceedings Before The ICC” in Sluiter, Göran and Stahn, Carsten (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Brill 2009)Google Scholar
Nöll, H-H, Die Völkerrechtssubjektivität der Europäischen Gemeinschaften und deren Bindung an das allgemeine Völkerrecht (Nomos 1986)Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A, “Saving the Scarecrow,” European Journal of International Law, 26 (2015), 957Google Scholar
Pallis, M, “The Operation of UNHCR’s Accountability Mechanisms,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 37 (2005), 869Google Scholar
Papastavridis, E, “EUNAVFOR Operation Atalanta off Somalia: The EU in Unchartered Legal Waters?” International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 64 (2015), 533Google Scholar
Papayannis, DM, “Independence, Impartiality and Neutrality in Legal Adjudication,” Revus (no 28) [2016], 33Google Scholar
Parish, M, ‘An Essay on the Accountability of International Organizations’ (2010) 7 International Organizations Law Review 277Google Scholar
Parlett, K, The Individual in the International Legal System: Continuity and Change in International Law (CUP 2011)Google Scholar
Paulsson, J, Denial of Justice in International Law (CUP 2005)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law (CUP 2003)Google Scholar
Payer, C, The World Bank: A Critical Analysis (Monthly Review Press 1982)Google Scholar
Pease, K-KS, International Organizations (5th ed., Routledge 2015)Google Scholar
Peers, S, “The EU’s Accession to the ECHR: The Dream Becomes a Nightmare’ (2015) 16 German Law Journal 213Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘The ILC’s Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts and Related Texts” in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (OUP 2010)Google Scholar
Pellet, A, “International Organizations Are Definitively Not States: Cursory Remarks on the ILC Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations” in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013)Google Scholar
Peters, A, Beyond Human Rights: The Legal Status of the Individual in International Law (CUP 2016)Google Scholar
Pillinger, M, Hurd, I, and Barnett, MN, “How to Get Away with Cholera: The UN, Haiti, and International Law,” Perspectives on Politics, 14 (2016), 70Google Scholar
Piris, J-C, The Lisbon Treaty: A Legal and Political Analysis (CUP 2010)Google Scholar
Pogge, T, “Justice: Philosophical Aspects” in Wright, James D (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Elsevier 2015) 943Google Scholar
Power, M, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (OUP 1997)Google Scholar
Raba, K, “The Accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Overview of the Accession Agreement,” ERA Forum, 14 (2013), 557Google Scholar
Ragazzi, M (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013)Google Scholar
Rawls, J, A Theory of Justice (revised edition, Belknap Press 1999)Google Scholar
Raz, J, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (2nd ed., OUP 2009)Google Scholar
Raz, J, “The Law’s Own Virtue,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 39 (2019), 1Google Scholar
Rehrl, J and Weisserth, H-B (eds.), Handbook on CSDP: The Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union (2nd amended ed., Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports of the Republic of Austria 2013)Google Scholar
Reiertsen, M, “The European Convention on Human Rights Article 13: Past, Present and Future” (PhD thesis, University of Oslo 2016)Google Scholar
Reif, LC, The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights System (Springer 2004)Google Scholar
Reinisch, A, “Governance Without Accountability?” German Yearbook of International Law, 44 (2001), 270Google Scholar
Reinisch, A, “Immunity of Property, Funds, and Assets (Article II Section 2 General Convention)” in Reinisch, August (ed.), The Conventions on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations and Its Specialized Agencies: A Commentary (OUP 2016)Google Scholar
Reinisch, A, International Organizations before National Courts (CUP 2000)Google Scholar
Reinisch, A, “Introduction to the General Convention” in Reinisch, August (ed.), The Conventions on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations and Its Specialized Agencies: A Commentary (OUP 2016)Google Scholar
Reinisch, A, (ed), The Privileges and Immunities of International Organizations in Domestic Courts (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Reyes, JR, “Deliver Us from Our Protectors: Accountability for Violations Committed by Humanitarian Aid Staff Against Refugee Women and Children,” University of San Francisco Law Review, 44 (2009), 211Google Scholar
Rodley, N and Pollard, M, The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law (3rd ed., OUP 2009)Google Scholar
Romano, CP, “Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle, The,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 31 (1998), 709Google Scholar
Romano, CP, “A Taxonomy of International Rule of Law Institutions,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2 (2011), 241Google Scholar
Romano, CP, Alter, KJ, and Shany, Y, “Mapping International Adjudicative Bodies, the Issues and Players” in Romano, Cesare PR, Alter, Karen J, and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C, Jurisdiction in International Law (2nd ed., OUP 2015)Google Scholar
Sadurska, R and Chinkin, C, “The Collapse of the International Tin Council: A Case of State Responsibility?” Virginia Journal of International Law, 30 (1989), 845Google Scholar
Sari, A, “Status of Forces and Status of Mission Agreements under the ESDP: The EU’s Evolving Practice” European Journal of International Law, 19 (2008), 67Google Scholar
Sari, A and Wessel, RA, “International Responsibility for EU Military Operations: Finding the EU’s Place in the Global Accountability Regime” in Vooren, Bart Van, Blockmans, Steven, and Wouters, Jan (eds.), The EU’s Role in Global Governance (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Schabas, WA (ed.), The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (2nd ed., OUP 2016)Google Scholar
Schachter, O, International Law in Theory and Practice (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1991)Google Scholar
Schachter, O, “Invisible College of International Lawyers,” Northwestern University Law Review, 72 (1977), 217Google Scholar
Schedler, A, “Conceptualizing Accountability” in Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry, and Plattner, Marc F (eds.), The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (Lynne Rienner Publishers 1999)Google Scholar
Schermers, HG and Blokker, NM, International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity (6th ed., Brill Nijhoff 2018)Google Scholar
Schillemans, T and Bovens, M, “The Challenge of Multiple Accountability: Does Redundancy Lead to Overload?” in Dubnick, Melvin J and George Frederickson, H (eds.), Accountable Governance: Problems and Promises (ME Sharpe 2011)Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, K, “Dispute Settlement (Article VIII Sections 29–30 General Convention)” in Reinisch, August (ed.), The Conventions on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations and Its Specialized Agencies: A Commentary (OUP 2016)Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, K, Die Haftung Internationaler Organisationen im Rahmen von Militäreinsätzen und Territorialverwaltungen (Lang 2004)Google Scholar
Schmitt, P, Access to Justice and International Organizations: The Case of Individual Victims of Human Rights Violations (Edward Elgar 2017)Google Scholar
Schmitt, P, “Manderlier v Organisation Des Nations Unies and Etat Belge” in Ryngaert, Cedric, Dekker, Ige F., Wessel, Ramses A, and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Judicial Decisions on the Law of International Organizations (OUP 2016)Google Scholar
Seerden, R, “Comparative Remarks” in Seerden, René (ed.), Administrative Law of the European Union, Its Member States and the United States: A Comparative Analysis (3rd ed., Intersentia 2012)Google Scholar
Seyersted, F, Common Law of International Organizations (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2008)Google Scholar
Seyersted, F, “Settlement of Internal Disputes of Intergovernmental Organizations by Internal and External Courts,” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 24 (1964), 1Google Scholar
Seyersted, F, United Nations Forces: In the Law of Peace and War (AW Sijthoff 1966)Google Scholar
Shany, Y, “Jurisdiction and Admissibility” in Romano, Cesare PR, Alter, Karen J, and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Shaw, MN, International Law (8th ed., CUP 2017)Google Scholar
Shelton, D, Remedies in International Human Rights Law (3rd ed., OUP 2015)Google Scholar
Sheppard, D, “International Criminal Court and Internationally Recognized Human Rights: Understanding Article 21(3) of the Rome Statute,” International Criminal Law Review, 10 (2010), 43Google Scholar
Shraga, D, “UN Peacekeeping Operations: Applicability of International Humanitarian Law and Responsibility for Operations-Related Damage,” The American Journal of International Law, 94 (2000), 406Google Scholar
Simma, B, “Universality of International Law from the Perspective of a Practitioner,” European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 265Google Scholar
Simma, B and Alston, P, “The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens, and General Principles,” Australian Year Book of International Law, 12 (1988), 82Google Scholar
Simma, B and Pulkowski, D, “Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law,” European Journal of International Law, 17 (2006), 483Google Scholar
Sinclair, GF, “The Original Sin (and Salvation) of Functionalism,” European Journal of International Law, 26 (2015), 965Google Scholar
Slaughter, A and Crisp, J, “A Surrogate State? The Role of UNHCR in Protracted Refugee Situations,” New Issues in Refugee Research: Research Paper No 168 (2009) <www.unhcr.org/4981cb432.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Sluiter, G, Friman, H, Linton, S, Vasiliev, S, and Zappalá, S (eds.), International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Smits, JM, “Redefining Normative Legal Science: Towards an Argumentative Discipline” in Coomans, Fons, Grünfeld, Fred, and Kamminga, Menno T (eds.), Methods of Human Rights Research (Intersentia 2009)Google Scholar
Smits, JM, “What Is Legal Doctrine? On the Aims and Methods of Legal-Dogmatic Research” in van Gestel, Rob, Micklitz, Hans-W, and Rubin, Edward L (eds.), Rethinking Legal Scholarship (CUP 2017)Google Scholar
Sommario, E, “Attribution of Conduct in the Framework of CSDP Missions: Reflections on a Recent Judgment by the Higher Administrative Court of Nordrhein-Westfalen” (2016) CLEER Papers 2016/5Google Scholar
Spernbauer, M, EU Peacebuilding in Kosovo and Afghanistan: Legality and Accountability (Brill 2014)Google Scholar
Spijkers, O, “Legal Mechanisms to Establish Accountability for the Genocide in Srebrenica,” Human Rights & International Legal Discourse, 1 (2007), 231Google Scholar
Stahn, C, The Law and Practice of International Territorial Administration: Versailles to Iraq and Beyond (CUP 2008)Google Scholar
Stern, B, “The Elements of an Internationally Wrongful Act” in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (OUP 2010)Google Scholar
Suzuki, E and Nanwani, S, “Responsibility of International Organizations: The Accountability Mechanisms of Multilateral Development Banks,” Michigan Journal of International Law, 27 (2005), 177Google Scholar
Tamanaha, BZ, “A Concise Guide to the Rule of Law” in Palombella, Gianluigi and Walker, Neil (eds.), Relocating the Rule of Law (Hart 2009)Google Scholar
Tesόn, FR, “Fake Custom” in Lepard, Brian D (ed.), Reexamining Customary International Law (CUP 2017)Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, “Human Rights in Customary Law: An Attempt to Define Some of the Issues,” Leiden Journal of International Law, 28 (2015), 495Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, The Sources of International Law (2nd ed., OUP 2019)Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C, Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism (OUP 2014)Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C, “International Courts and Tribunals” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online ed) (OUP 2011) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/mpil>Google Scholar
Tsadiras, A, “Navigating Through the Clashing Rocks: The Admissibility Conditions and the Grounds for Inquiry into Complaints by the European Ombudsman,” Yearbook of European Law, 26 (2007), 157Google Scholar
Tsadiras, A, “The Ombudsman” in Craig, Paul, EU Administrative Law (2nd ed., OUP 2012)Google Scholar
Tsadiras, A, “The Ombudsman” in Craig, Paul, EU Administrative Law (3rd ed., OUP 2018)Google Scholar
Tyler, TR, Lind, EA, Ohbuchi, K-I, Sugawara, I, and Huo, YJ, “Conflict with Outsiders: Disputing within and Across Cultural Boundaries,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24 (1998), 137Google Scholar
Tyler, TR, Lind, EA, Ohbuchi, K-I, Sugawara, I, and Huo, YJ, “Procedural Justice” in Sarat, Austin (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society (Blackwell Publishing 2004)Google Scholar
Tyler, TR, Lind, EA, Ohbuchi, K-I, Sugawara, I, and Huo, YJ, “Procedural Justice and the Courts,” Court Review, 44 (2007), 26Google Scholar
Tyler, TR, Lind, EA, Ohbuchi, K-I, Sugawara, I, and Huo, YJ, “The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1 (1997), 323Google Scholar
Tyler, TR, Lind, EA, Ohbuchi, K-I, Sugawara, I, and Huo, YJ, Why People Obey the Law (Princeton University Press 2006)Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A, Disobeying the Security Council: Countermeasures against Wrongful Sanctions (OUP 2011)Google Scholar
Ulfstein, G, “Treaty Bodies and Regimes” in Hollis, Duncan B (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (OUP 2012)Google Scholar
UNHCR, The State of The World’s Refugees 2000: Fifty Years of Humanitarian Action (OUP 2000)Google Scholar
van Zyl Smit, D and Snacken, S, Principles of European Prison Law and Policy: Penology and Human Rights (OUP 2009)Google Scholar
Vandenbogaerde, A, Towards Shared Accountability in International Human Rights Law: Law, Procedures and Principles (Intersentia 2016)Google Scholar
Verdirame, G, The UN and Human Rights: Who Guards the Guardians? (CUP 2011)Google Scholar
Verdirame, G and Harrell-Bond, B, Rights In Exile: Janus-Faced Humanitarianism (Berghahn Books 2005)Google Scholar
Verellen, T, “H v. Council: Strengthening the Rule of Law in the Sphere of the CFSP, One Step at a Time,” European Papers, 1 (2016), 1041Google Scholar
Vermunt, R and Steensma, H, “Procedural Justice” in Sabbagh, Clara and Schmitt, Manfred (eds.), Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (Springer New York 2016)Google Scholar
Voeten, E, “International Judicial Independence” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L, and Pollack, Mark A (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations (CUP 2012)Google Scholar
Voeten, E, “Public Opinion and the Legitimacy of International Courts,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 14 (2013), 411Google Scholar
Voigt, C, “The Role of General Principles in International Law and Their Relationship to Treaty Law,” Retfærd, 31 (2008), 3Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, A and Venzke, I, In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication (OUP 2014)Google Scholar
Waldron, J, “Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)?” Law and Philosophy, 21 (2002), 137Google Scholar
Waldron, J, “The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure,” Nomos, 50 (2011), 3Google Scholar
Walkup, M, “Policy and Behavior in Humanitarian Organizations: The Institutional Origins of Operational Dysfunction” (PhD thesis, University of Florida 1997)Google Scholar
Weiss, RS, Learning From Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies (Free Press 1994)Google Scholar
Wellens, K, Remedies against International Organisations (CUP 2002)Google Scholar
Welsh, N, Schneider, A, and Rimpfel, K, “Using the Theories of Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Procedural Justice to Reconceptualize Brazil’s Rejection of Bilateral Investment Treaties,” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 45 (2014), 105Google Scholar
Wenar, L, “Accountability in International Development Aid,” Ethics & International Affairs, 20 (2006), 1Google Scholar
Wessel, RA, “Immunities of the European Union,” International Organizations Law Review, 10 (2014), 395Google Scholar
Wessel, RA and den Hertog, L, “EU Foreign, Security and Defence Policy: A Competence-Accountability Gap?” in Evans, Malcolm D and Koutrakos, Panos (eds.), The International Responsibility of the European Union: European and International Perspectives (Hart 2013)Google Scholar
White, ND, The Law of International Organisations (2nd ed., Manchester University Press 2005)Google Scholar
Wijk, J van and Cupido, M, “Testifying behind Bars – Detained ICC Witnesses and Human Rights Protection” in Stahn, Carsten (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court (OUP 2015)Google Scholar
Wilde, R, International Territorial Administration (OUP 2008)Google Scholar
Wilde, R, “Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes: Why and How UNHCR Governance of ‘Development’ Refugee Camps Should Be Subject to International Human Rights Law,” Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal, 1 (1998), 107Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R, “Purposes and Principles, Article 1” in Simma, Bruno, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Nolte, Georg, and Paulus, Andreas (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, vol. 1 (3rd ed., OUP 2012)Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R and Riedel, E, “Article 55 (c)” in Simma, Bruno, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Nolte, Georg, and Paulus, Andreas (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, vol. 2 (3rd ed., OUP 2012)Google Scholar
Wood, M, “Do International Organizations Enjoy Immunity Under Customary International Law?” International Organizations Law Review, 10 (2014), 287Google Scholar
Wood, M, “First Report of the Special Rapporteur on Identification of Customary International Law” (International Law Commission 2013) UN Doc A/CN.4/663Google Scholar
Wood, M, “Third Report of the Special Rapporteur on Identification of Customary International Law” (International Law Commission 2015) UN Doc A/CN.4/682Google Scholar
Wouters, J, Brems, E, Smis, S, and Schmitt, P (eds.), Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organisations (Intersentia 2010)Google Scholar
Wouters, J and Odermatt, J, “Are All International Organizations Created Equal?” International Organizations Law Review, 9 (2012), 7Google Scholar
Wouters, J and Ryngaert, C, “Impact on the Process of the Formation of Customary International Law” in Kamminga, Menno T and Scheinin, Martin (eds.), The Impact of Human Rights Law on General International Law (OUP 2009)Google Scholar
Yin, RK, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed. SAGE 2018)Google Scholar
Young, R, “Internationally Recognized Human Rights before the International Criminal Court’ (2011) 60 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 189Google Scholar
Zagel, GM, “Human Rights Accountability of the WTO,” Human Rights & International Legal Discourse, 1 (2007), 335Google Scholar
Zieck, M, UNHCR’s Worldwide Presence in the Field: A Legal Analysis of UNHCR’s Cooperation Agreements (Wolf Legal Publishers 2006)Google Scholar
Ziegler, AR, “Article 105” in Simma, Bruno, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Nolte, Georg, and Paulus, Andreas (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, vol. 2 (3rd ed., OUP 2012)Google Scholar
Zimbardo, PG, The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil (Random House 2007)Google Scholar
Zwanenburg, M, Accountability of Peace Support Operations (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2005)Google Scholar
Zwanenburg, M, “The Secretary-General’s Bulletin on Observance by United Nations Forces of International Humanitarian Law: A Pyrrhic Victory,” Military Law and Law of War Review, 39 (2000), 13Google Scholar
Zwanenburg, M, “The Van Boven/Bassiouni Principles: An Appraisal,” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 24 (2006), 641Google Scholar
Ahlenius, Inga-Britt, “End of Assignment Report” (July 14, 2010) <www.humanrightsvoices.org/assets/attachments/documents/8802reportbrit.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Conference of International Investigators, “Uniform Principles and Guidelines for Investigations” (2nd ed., 2009) <www.conf-int-investigators.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/CII-Uniform-Principles-and-Guidelines-for-Investigations_2ed-2009.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Council of Australian Law Deans, “Statement on the Nature of Legal Research” (March and October 2005) <https://cald.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/cald-statement-on-the-nature-of-legal-research-20051.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Girodo, Michel, “A Culture Review of the Investigations Division of OIOS” (July 13, 2007) <www.innercitypress.com/oiosrev2.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Grimstad, Erling, “Final Report: Review of the OIOS Investigations Division, United Nations” (June 26, 2007) <www.innercitypress.com/oiosrev1.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, Resolution on “The Legal Consequences for Member States of the Non-Fulfilment by International Organizations of Their Obligations toward Third Parties” (September 1, 1995) <www.idi-iil.org/app/uploads/2017/06/1995_lis_02_en.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
International Expert Conference, “Vienna+20: Advancing the Protection of Human Rights – Conference Report” <www.ohchr.org/Documents/Events/OHCHR20/ConferenceReport.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
International Law Association, “Final Report on the Impact of International Human Rights Law on General International Law” (2008) <http://ila.vettoreweb.com/Storage/Download.aspx?DbStorageId=1149&StorageFileGuid=7f1c15c2-3e34-45e5-bca0-a7ea435b058e> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions, “The Lima Declaration of Guidelines on Auditing Precepts” (1997) INTOSAI Doc ISSAI 1Google Scholar
Lewis, Kirsten, “Citizen-Driven Accountability for Sustainable Development: Giving Affected People a Greater Voice – 20 Years On” (Independent Accountability Mechanisms Network, June 2012)Google Scholar
Save the Children UK, “From Camp to Community: Liberia Study on Exploitation of Children” (May 8, 2006) <www.essex.ac.uk/armedcon/story_id/000381.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Save the Children UK, “No One to Turn To: The Under-Reporting of Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse by Aid Workers and Peacekeepers” (May 27, 2008) <www.refworld.org/pdfid/483c2a822.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Transnational Development Clinic, Global Health Justice Partnership and Association Haitienne de Droit de L’Environnment, “Peacekeeping without Accountability: The United Nation’s Responsibility for the Haitian Cholera Outbreak” (2013) <www.ijdh.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Final-Report.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
UNHCR and Save the Children UK, “Note for Implementing and Operational Partners on Sexual Violence & Exploitation: The Experience of Refugee Children in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone” (February 2002) <www.savethechildren.org.uk/content/dam/global/reports/health-and-nutrition/sexual_violence_and_exploitation_1.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Yearbook of International Organizations, “Number of International Organizations by Type” (Edition 55, 2018/2019) <https://ybio.brillonline.com/system/files/pdf/v5/2018/2_1.pdf> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Carvajal, Doreen, “Accused of War Crimes, and Living With Perks” The New York Times (June 3, 2010) <www.nytimes.com/2010/06/04/world/europe/04iht-hague.html> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Hartmann, Florence, “How I Was Arrested by a War Crimes Tribunal – for My Journalism” The Intercept (April 19, 2016) <https://theintercept.com/2016/04/19/how-i-was-arrested-by-a-war-crimes-tribunal-for-my-journalism/> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Hopkins, Valerie, “EU Courts Trouble with Kosovo Scandal” POLITICO.eu (November 17, 2017) <www.politico.eu/article/malcolm-simmons-eulex-eu-courts-chaos-with-kosovo-scandal/> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Katz, Jonathan M, “U.N. Admits Role in Cholera Epidemic in Haiti” The New York Times (August 17, 2016) <www.nytimes.com/2016/08/18/world/americas/united-nations-haiti-cholera.html> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Lynch, Colum, “U.N. Drops Leak Investigation into Human Rights Official in CAR Sex Scandal” Foreign Policy (January 15, 2016) <https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/01/15/kompass-zeid-high-commissioner-sex-scandal-peacekeepers-exclusive-u-n-drops-leak-investigation-into-human-rights-official-in-car-sex-scandal/> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Panichi, , James and Ariès, Quentin, “Who Let the Watchdog Out?” POLITICO.eu (Brussels, October 8, 2015) <www.politico.eu/article/emma-oreilly-ombudsman-eu-juncker-transparency/> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Saeed, Saim, “Top Judge Quits EU Kosovo Mission, Alleging Corruption” POLITICO.eu (November 16, 2017) <www.politico.eu/article/judge-quits-eu-kosovo-mission-alleging-corruption/> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
“U.N. Finally Forced to Probe Its Pedophilia Scandal” United Press International/Newsmax (May 6, 2002) <www.newsmax.com/Pre-2008/U-NFinally-Forced-Probe/2002/05/06/id/666968/> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Dutch Ministry of Defence, Beelden Boardingteam Hr. Ms. Tromp van Bevrijdingsactie Koopvaardijschip Taipan (2010) <www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcqZKBJMNhI> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar
Kenya CitizenTV, The Hague Cell (2009) <www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwzoO9hV9zg> accessed October 10, 2019+accessed+October+10,+2019>Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Stian Øby Johansen, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Book: The Human Rights Accountability Mechanisms of International Organizations
  • Online publication: 20 August 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108862608.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Stian Øby Johansen, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Book: The Human Rights Accountability Mechanisms of International Organizations
  • Online publication: 20 August 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108862608.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Stian Øby Johansen, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Book: The Human Rights Accountability Mechanisms of International Organizations
  • Online publication: 20 August 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108862608.008
Available formats
×